Odonatologica 34(2): 131-153 June 1, 2005 A reviewof the Odonata of Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia ¹, H.J. Dumont A.Yu. Haritonov²,O.E.Kosterin E.I. Malikova4 and O. Popova²* ³, Ghent B-9000 ' Limnology group, University, Ledeganckstraat 35, Ghent, Belgium; —
[email protected] 2 Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Frunze 11, RUS-630091 Novosibirsk, Russia; -
[email protected] 3 Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentiev ave 10, RUS-630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; —
[email protected] 4 Blagoveshchensk State PedagogicalUniversity, ul. Lenina 104, RUS-675027 Blagoveshchensk, Amur Province, Russia; -
[email protected] Received May 25, 2004 / Reviewed and Accepted October 22, 2004 All knowledge of the odon. fauna of Kamchatka Peninsula (NE Asia) is reviewed, using literature data, miscellaneous collections and the results of anexpedition by the with authors in July 2003. In total, 27 spp. have become known, Lestes dryas, Coena- grionhastulatum, Aeshna serrata, Epitheca bimaculata, Somatochlora exuberata, S. al- pestris, and Leucorrhinia intermedia here reported for the first time. Aeshna palmata is Anax dismissed; junius, twice reported in the 19th century, is an American migrant that rarely reaches Kamchatka; the southern migrants, Pantala flavescens and Sympetrum are oneold record each, with still in Zool. frequens, represented by specimens preserved Inst., St Petersburg. Very few more spp. may be expected in future, and it is concluded that the fauna is ofan impoverishedboreal extraction. This lack of endemism is under- standable, since dragonflies could only begin reinvadingthe peninsula around 13,000BP. 7 spp.