DOCSLIB.ORG

INTRODUCTION 1. Reed Way Dasenbrock

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Notes RICHARD FREADMAN AND LLOYD REINHARDT: INTRODUCTION 1. Reed Way Dasenbrock (ed.), Redrawing the Lines: Analytic Philosophy, Deconstruction, and Literary Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minne­ sota Press, 1989). 2. The reply appeared initially in Scrutiny, Vol. VI, No.1 Oune 1937) and is reprinted in F. R. Leavis, The Common Pursuit (London: Penguin, 1966), pp. 211-22. 3. Dasenbrock, Redrawing the Lines, p. 3. 4. Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer­ sity Press, 1957). See especially Frye's 'Polemical Introduction'. 5. See Richard Macksey and Eugene Donato (eds), The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970). 6. See Mary Louise Pratt, Towards a Speech Act Theory of Literature (Bloom­ ington: Indiana University Press, 1977), and Richard Ohmann, 'Speech Acts and the Definition of Literature', Philosophy and Rhetoric, 4 (Winter 1971), pp. 1-19. 7. For discussion of the Geneva School and other aspects of Husserl's influence see Robert R. Magolia, Phenomenology and Literature: An Introduction (West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 1977). 8. Alfred Schutz, Collected Papers, ed. Maurice Natanson (3 vols, The Hague: Martinus Nijoff, 197~1976). 9. Mikel Dufrenne, The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience, trans. E. S. Casey, A. A. Anderson, Willis Domingo and Leon Jacobson (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973). 10. Roman Ingarden, The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and the Theory of Literature, trans. George G. Grabowicz (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973); The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, trans. Ruth Anne Crowley and Kenneth R. Olson (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973). 11. See especially E. D. Hirsch Jr, Validity in Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967). 12. Jacques Derrida, 'Signature Event Context', trans. Samuel Webber and Jeffrey Mehlman, Glyph, 1 (1977), pp. 172-97; John Searle, 'Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida', Glyph, 1 (1977), pp. 198-208; Jacques Derrida, 'Limited Inc abc', Glyph, 2 (1977), pp. 162-254. 13. Dasenbrock, Redrawing the Lines, p. 13. 14. Shoshana Felman, The Literary Speech Act: Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages, trans. Catherine Porter (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983); Henry Statten, Wittgenstein and Derrida (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1984). 253 254 Notes - Ian Saunders RICHARD FREADMAN AND SEUMAS MILLER: DECONSTRUCTION AND CRITICAL PRACTICE 1. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, 'Sex and History in The Prelude (1805), Books IX-XIII', Richard Machin and Christopher Norris (eds.), Post­ structuralist Readings of English Poetry (London: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 193-227. Page references to the article will appear in parentheses after quotations. The article is reprinted in Gayatri Spivak's recent volume, In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics (London: Methuen, 1987), pp. 46-76. 2. Howard Felperin, Beyond Deconstruction: The Uses and Abuses of Literary Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), p. 33. 3. The text used here is J. c. Maxwell (ed.), William Wordsworth: The Prelude: A Parallel Text (London: Penguin, 1971). Unless, as in this case, there has been cause to quote the 1850 version, we have followed Spivak in citing the 1805 one. 4. On Wordsworth and Burke, see James K. Chandler, Wordsworth's Second Nature: A Study of Poetry and Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984). 5. Geoffrey Hartman, Wordsworth's Poetry: 1787-1814 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), p. 168. 6. The note of doubt appears in such lines as: Of these and other kindred notices I cannot say what portion is in truth The naked recollection of that time, And what may rather have been called to life By after-meditation. (III, 644-8) 7. Woody Allen, 'Conversations with Helmholtz', in Getting Even (New York: Vintage Books, 1978), p. 85. 8. We have largely derived this account from the chapter 'Linguistics and Grammatology' in Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), pp.27-73. 9. M. H. Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature (New York: Norton, 1971), p. 96. For a review of Natural Supernaturalism written under Derridean influence see J. Hillis Miller 'Tradition and Difference', Diacritics, 2 (Winter 1972), pp. 6-13. 10. Ibid., pp. 113-14. 11. David Novitz, Knowledge, Fiction & Imagination (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987). See especially Ch. 1 and Ch. 2. 12. Hartman, Wordsworth's Poetry, p. 66. 13. Coleridge, Biographia Literaria, ed. George Watson (London: Dent, 1975), especially Ch. XIII. 14. The quotation is from Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957), p. 348. Notes - Ian Saunders 255 15. Given that Gayatri Spivak, a non-Caucasian critic, has written at length about the status and mythology of the 'subaltern' (see In Other Worlds, Ch. 12), it may seem provocative of us to use the term 'alien' here. This is not our intention. However, in respect of Wordsworth's poem we use the term advisedly, and here some explanation is necessary. At one level we sympathise with Spivak's desire to con­ struct out of elements of Wordsworth's poem (and other texts, theor­ ies etc.) a sort of subversive or ur- text which will meet her needs, and address her interests, as a marginalised person. At another level, however, such a critical procedure concerns us insofar as its denial or silencing of the poem Wordsworth actually wrote amounts to a denial and silencing of Wordsworth. We believe such critical acts of re­ pression on the part of the repressed to be of doubtful value. By all means, let us understand the presence and nature of ideological elements in Wordsworth's poem; but we contend that in order to understand these and other things about the poem, it is necessary to grasp the poem in its own discursive context. Failure to do so ulti­ mately works against the interests of political criticism because it blocks or obscures access to the very things - ideology, for instance­ that political criticism seeks to elucidate. It should also be noted that the poem Wordsworth wrote serves perfectly valid, non-ideological interests and needs of individuals in cultural situations other than (or even, perhaps, similar to) that of Spivak's own: for example, individ­ uals whose spiritual sensibilities find fulfilment in The Prelude but would be desolated by the Marxist-semiological denial of the spiritual realm. 16. The term is Eugene Goodheart's, The Skeptic Disposition in Contempor­ ary Criticism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 14. IAN SAUNDERS: ON THE ALIEN 1. Jonathan Ree, Philosophical Tales: An Essay on Philosophy and Literature (London: Methuen, 1987), p. 55. 2. Michel de Certeau, 'On the OppOSitional Practices of Everyday Life', Social Text, 3 (1980), pp. 3-43, (6). 3. Imre Salusinszky, Criticism in Society (New York and London: Methuen, 1987), p. 81. 4. Richard Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972-1980 (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1982), p. 97. 5. The phrase is Wolfgang Haug's. See his Commodity Aesthetics, Ideology and Culture (New York: International General, 1987), pp. 103-20. 6. See for example Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contempor­ ary Criticism, (second edition, London: Methuen, 1983), pp. 206, 237, and Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), p. 19. 7. Salusinszky, Criticism in Society, p. 164. 8. Ludwig Wittgenstein, On Certainty, trans. Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969), p. 24e #166. 256 Notes - Christopher Cordner 9. Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Vintage Books, 1973), p. xxiii. 10. Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Spivak (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), p. 99. 11. Gayatri Spivak, 'Sex and History in The Prelude', in Richard Machin and Christopher Norris (eds), Post-structuralist Readings of English Poetry, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 219. 12. Ian Hacking, Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), p. 171. 13. Roy Harris, The Language Myth (London: Duckworth, 1981), p. 204. 14. Donald Davidson, 'A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs' in Ernest LePore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986), p. 446. Cited in Rorty, Con­ tingency, Irony, Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 15. 15. Rorty, Contingency, p. 21. 16. Michael Dummett, 'A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs: Some Com­ ments on Davidson and Hacking', in LePore (ed.), Truth and Interpreta­ tion, p. 465. 17. The 'origin' (if that is quite the word under the circumstances) being of course Derrida's 'Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences', in Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (London: Routledge, 1978), p. 292. CHRISTOPHER CORDNER: F. R. LEAVIS AND THE MORAL IN LITERATURE 1. There is a fair body of critical work on Leavis. Among the best of it is V. Buckley, Poetry and Morality (London: Chatto & Windus, 1959), Ch. 6 and Ch. 7; J. Casey, The Language of Criticism (London: Methuen, 1966), Ch. 8 and Ch. 9; and M. Tanner, 'Literature and Philosophy', New Universities Quarterly (Winter 1975), pp. 54-64. Those who have sought to criticise Leavis from a post-modernist standpoint have for the most part shown little insight into his work: e.g. C. Belsey, 'Re-Reading the Great Tradition', in Re-Reading English ed. P. Widdow­ son (London & New York: Methuen, 1982), and Critical Practice (Lon­ don & New York: Methuen, 1980), Ch. 1; and H. Felperin, Beyond Deconstruction: The Uses and Abuses of Literary Theory (Oxford: Claren­ don Press, 1985), Ch. 1 in an otherwise perceptive and judicious book. A partial exception is Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983), Ch.
Recommended publications
  • Martin Heidegger's Phenomenology and the Science of Mind

    Martin Heidegger's Phenomenology and the Science of Mind

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2005 Martin Heidegger's phenomenology and the science of mind Charles Dale Hollingsworth Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Hollingsworth, Charles Dale, "Martin Heidegger's phenomenology and the science of mind" (2005). LSU Master's Theses. 2713. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2713 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S PHENOMENOLOGY AND THE SCIENCE OF MIND A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In The Department of Philosophy by Charles Dale Hollingsworth B.A., Mississippi State University, 2003 May 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract.......................................................................................iii Chapter 1 The Computational Model of Mind and its Critics..........1 2 One Attempt at a Heideggerean Approach to Cognitive Science...........................................................................14 3 Heidegger on Scientific
  • Reason, Causation and Compatibility with the Phenomena

    Reason, Causation and Compatibility with the Phenomena

    Reason, causation and compatibility with the phenomena Basil Evangelidis Series in Philosophy Copyright © 2020 Vernon Press, an imprint of Vernon Art and Science Inc, on behalf of the author. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Vernon Art and Science Inc. www.vernonpress.com In the Americas: In the rest of the world: Vernon Press Vernon Press 1000 N West Street, C/Sancti Espiritu 17, Suite 1200, Wilmington, Malaga, 29006 Delaware 19801 Spain United States Series in Philosophy Library of Congress Control Number: 2019942259 ISBN: 978-1-62273-755-0 Cover design by Vernon Press. Cover image by Garik Barseghyan from Pixabay. Product and company names mentioned in this work are the trademarks of their respective owners. While every care has been taken in preparing this work, neither the authors nor Vernon Art and Science Inc. may be held responsible for any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the information contained in it. Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition. Table of contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction xi Chapter 1 Causation, determinism and the universe 1 1. Natural principles and the rise of free-will 1 1.1. “The most exact of the sciences” 2 1.2.
  • Emmanuel Levinas on Evasion and Moral Responsibility

    Emmanuel Levinas on Evasion and Moral Responsibility

    BEYOND TRAGEDY AND THE SACRED: EMMANUEL LEVINAS ON EVASION AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY JOHN CARUANA A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial hlfilrnent of the requirernents for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Programme in Social and Political Thought York University Toronto. Ontario July 2000 National Library Bibliothèque nationaIe of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON KI A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fonnat électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othefwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Beyond Tragedy and the Sacred: Emmanuel Levinas on Evasion and Moral Responsibility by John Caruana a dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHtLOSOPHY O Permission has been granted to the LIBRARY OF YORK UNIVERSITY to lend or seIl copies of this dissertation, to the NATIONAL LIBRARY OF CANADA to microfilm this dissertation and to Iend or seIl copies of the film, and to UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS to publish an abstract of this dissertation.
  • Suicide-Authors: a Deconstructive Study by Lilia Loman

    Suicide-Authors: a Deconstructive Study by Lilia Loman

    Suicide-Authors: A Deconstructive Study By Lilia Loman ( Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Part I ............................................................................................................ 6 1. Theorising Suicide .......................•.............................................................. 6 2. Memorial Texts: Suicide as a Posthumous Performance ..................•...........•.. 33 3. The Deaths of the Suicide-Author ............................................................... 71 Part II ........................................................................................................ 99 4. Speaking to/about the Dead: Plath's Belated Witnesses ................................ 99 5. "The blood jet is poetry": Plath in Her Own Words ...................................... 134 6. "Burning the Letters": The Plath-Hughes Dialogue ...................................... 168 ,., Conclusion ..........•.........................•...•...................•................................... 194 Works Cited ..........................................................•..•.•.............................. 199 Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to problematise the relationship between suicide and the author. On the basis of a deconstructive approach, it will study the effect of the self-inflicted death of the writer, namely the emergence of a dual figure, the "suicide-author".
  • The Cambridge Companion to LEVINAS

    The Cambridge Companion to LEVINAS

    The Cambridge Companion to LEVINAS Edited by Simon Critchley University of Essex and Robert Bernasconi University of Memphis published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru,UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain DockHouse, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2002 This bookis in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2002 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Trump Medieval 10/13 pt System LATEX 2ε [tb] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library isbn 0 521 66206 0 hardback isbn 0 521 66565 5 paperback contents List of contributors page ix Acknowledgements xii List of abbreviations xiii Emmanuel Levinas: a disparate inventory xv simon critchley 1 Introduction 1 simon critchley 2 Levinas and Judaism 33 hilary putnam 3 Levinas and the face of the other 63 bernhard waldenfels 4 Levinas’s critique of Husserl 82 rudolf bernet 5 Levinas and the Talmud 100 catherine chalier 6 Levinas and language 119 john llewelyn 7 Levinas, feminism and the feminine 139 stella sandford 8 Sincerity and the end of theodicy: three remarks on Levinas and Kant 161 paul davies vii viii Contents 9 Language and alterity in the thought of Levinas 188 edith wyschogrod 10 The concepts of art and poetry in Emmanuel Levinas’s writings 206 gerald l.
  • Book Chapter Reference

    Book Chapter Reference

    Book Chapter The Geneva School: form and signification in motion POT, Olivier Reference POT, Olivier. The Geneva School: form and signification in motion. In: Marina Grishakova, M. & Salupere, S. Theoretical schools and circles in the twenthieth-century humanities. New York : Routledge, 2015. Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:78309 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 9 The Geneva School Time] in 1949. Toward the end of 1949, Raymond and Poulet embarked on a long correspondence reporting on and discussing their respective work. Form and Signification in Motion In 1950, the three names René Wellek (1992) associated with "The Geneva School" were Raymond (1897-1981), Béguin (1901-1957), and Poulet (1902-1991). Olivier Pot Later, two of Raymond's students, Jean Rousset (1910-2002) and Jean translated by Helena Taylor Starobinski (1920) joined this initial circle. Poulet, who from 1952 had taken up a post at Johns Hopkins University in Bàltimore, introduced Starobinski to the circle in 1954, and in the same year he became acquainted with Jean Rousset's thesis (Rousset 1953). Historians sometimes also add Poulet's doctoral student, Jean-Pierre Richard (1922; Richard 2002, 47-48) to this "The Geneva School" was the term used from the 1950s and 1960s to group. The term "Nouvelle critique"' appears for the first time in Poulet's describe a group of literary cri tics who belonged to the movement known in preface to Richard's book, Littérature et sensation published in 1954. In France as the Nouvelle Critique, following the confrontation between Picard 1956, Poulet accepted a chair in literature at Zurich University, probably and Barthes over Sur Racine in 1963.
  • Book Reviews Criticism Editors

    Book Reviews Criticism Editors

    Criticism Volume 29 | Issue 3 Article 5 1987 Book Reviews Criticism Editors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism Recommended Citation Editors, Criticism (1987) "Book Reviews," Criticism: Vol. 29: Iss. 3, Article 5. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol29/iss3/5 Book Reviews Derrida and the Economy of Differance by Irene Harvey. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986. Pp. xv + 285. $24.95. Irene Harvey makes it plain from the outset that this is a philosopher's book, designed in large part to rescue Derrida from the false characterization of his work put about by literary critics. Her reading will proceed by way of textual explication, but not-most certainly-the kind of exuberant verbal "freeplay" espoused by his admireres in deparbnents of literature. Rather, its approach will be to place Derrida's writings in a post-Kantian tradition where issues of epistemological critique are still very much on the agenda. Decon­ struction may seem to have shelved such questions in its will to break with the prevailing discourse of Western "logocentric" reason. Certainly this has been the reading canvassed by those who want to argue that philosophy is just another kind of writing, with no privileged truth-claims that would set it apart from poetry, criticism or the human sciences at large. Some (like Geof­ frey Hartman) have seized upon those elements in Derrida's work that seem to subvert such merely institutional boundary-lines, and to open up a space of liberated intertextuality
  • Towards a Bergsonian Philosophy of Artryan D. Lewis

    Towards a Bergsonian Philosophy of Artryan D. Lewis

    University of Dundee DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY An Ontology of Images and Painterly Subjectivity Towards a Bergsonian Philosophy of Art Lewis, Ryan D. Award date: 2013 Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY An Ontology of Images & Painterly Subjectivity: Towards a Bergsonian Philosophy of Art Ryan D. Lewis PhD University of Dundee December 2013 An Ontology of Images & Painterly Subjectivity: Towards a Bergsonian Philosophy of Art RYAN D. LEWIS Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. DECEMBER 2013 Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. iv Declaration ...............................................................................................................
  • JACQUES DERRIDA 3 4 5111 6 7 8 9 10111 11 2 3111 4 5 6 7 1118 ‘Excellent, Strong, Clear and Original’

    JACQUES DERRIDA 3 4 5111 6 7 8 9 10111 11 2 3111 4 5 6 7 1118 ‘Excellent, Strong, Clear and Original’

    º1111 2 JACQUES DERRIDA 3 4 5111 6 7 8 9 10111 11 2 3111 4 5 6 7 1118 ‘Excellent, strong, clear and original’. Jacques Derrida. 9 ‘A strong, inventive and daring book that does much more than most introductions are 20111 capable of even dreaming’. Diane Elam, Cardiff University. 1 ‘Readers couldn’t ask for a more authoritative and knowledgeable guide. Although there 2 is no playing down of the immensity of the implications of Derrida’s work, Royle’s direct and often funny mode of address will make it less threatening than it can often 3 appear to beginners’. Derek Attridge, University of York. 4 In this entertaining and provocative introduction, Royle offers lucid explanations of var- 5 ious key ideas, including deconstruction, differance and the democracy to come. He also 6 gives attention, however, to a range of perhaps less obvious topics, such as earthquakes, 7 animals and animality, ghosts, monstrosity, the poematic, drugs, gifts, secrets, war and 8 mourning. Derrida is seen as an extraordinarily inventive thinker, as well as a brilliantly 9 imaginative and often very funny writer. Other critical introductions tend to highlight the specifically philosophical nature and genealogy of his work. Royle’s book proceeds 30111 in a new and different way, in particular by focusing on the crucial but strange place of 1 literature in Derrida’s writings. He thus provides an appreciation and understanding 2 based on detailed reference to Derrida’s texts, interwoven with close readings of liter- 3 ary works. In doing so, he explores Derrida’s consistent view that deconstruction is a 4 ‘coming-to-terms with literature’.

  • The Structuralist Controversy

    The Structuralist Controversy The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man edited by Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore and London Copyright c 1970,1972 by The Johns Hopkins Press All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, xerography, or any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher. Manufactured in the United States of America The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 The Johns Hopkins Press Ltd., London Originally published, 1970, as The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man Johns Hopkins paperback edition, 1972 Second printing, 1975 Third printing, 1977 Fourth printing, 1979 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 78-95789 ISBN 0-8018-1047-7 (hardcover) ISBN 0-8018-1381 -6 (paperback) To the memory of Jean Hyppolite— scholar, teacher, and friend of scholars . Seit ein Gesprach wir sind Und horen konnen voneinander. —Holderlin Contents ix The Space Between—1971 xv Preface to First Edition Richard Macksey 1 Lions and Squares: Opening Remarks Ren£ Girard 15 Tiresias and the Critic Charles Moraze 22 Literary Invention 33 Discussion Georges Poulet $6 Criticism and the Experience of Inferiority 73 Discussion Eugenio Donato 89 The Two Languages of Criticism Lucien Goldmann 98 Structure: Human Reality and Methodological Concept 110 Discussion: Donato—Goldmann Tzvetan Todorov 125 Language and Literature

  • The Problem of History in the Temporal Ethics of Henri Bergson

    The Problem of History in the Temporal Ethics of Henri Bergson, Emmanuel Levinas and Gilles Deleuze David Ventura Royal Holloway, University of London PhD in Philosophy Declaration of Authorship I, David Ventura, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: _______________________________ Date: 23/03/2020 2 Abstract This thesis explores the ethics of relating oneself to temporality that emerges in the philosophies of Henri Bergson, Emmanuel Levinas and Gilles Deleuze. Focusing on Bergson’s, Levinas’ and Deleuze’s respective suggestions as to how an ethical relation to a time of novelty is effectuated, this thesis argues that each of those ethical models retains a problematic relation to history, and that a potential resolution to this problem is only found in Deleuze and Guattari’s joint work. Starting with an exploration of Bergson’s metaphysical writings, this thesis argues that Bergson’s conception of intuition remains insufficiently attuned to that practice’s implication with the domain of history, and that this presents a problem for Bergson’s ethical philosophy. The thesis then turns to Bergson’s The Two Sources of Morality and Religion to argue that this text, despite seemingly historicising the intuition, in fact fails to provide a resolution to the problem of history that announces itself in Bergson’s metaphysical writings. Motivated by these failures in the Bergsonian oeuvre, this thesis then turns its attention to two self-professed Bergsonians, Levinas and Deleuze, to consider the extent to which their respective ethical philosophies can be said to provide a resolution to the Bergsonian problem of history.
  • Transcritical Encounters in Lacanian Psychoanalysis,” Intersections 11, No

    Transcritical Encounters in Lacanian Psychoanalysis,” Intersections 11, No

    intersections online Volume 11, Number 2 (Autumn 2010) Bryan Klausmeyer, “Transcritical Encounters in Lacanian Psychoanalysis,” intersections 11, no. 2 (2010): 10-66. ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is to provide a “transcendental critical” interpretation of Lacanian psychoanalysis through an examination of the historical circumstances surrounding the development of Lacan's ideas and their underlying philosophical basis. Rather than operating as a closed system, I argue that Lacanian thought functions on the basis of "parallax" between irreconcilable positions (e.g., Kleinian vs. Anna-Freudian psychoanalysis, structuralism vs. poststructuralism) stemming from a central antinomy. To that end, Lacan ought to be understood above all as a critic, in the same vein as Kant and Marx. http://depts.washington.edu/chid/intersections_Autumn_2010/Bryan_Klausmeyer_Transcritical_Encounters_in_Lacanian_Psychoanalysis.pdf Fair Use Notice: The images within this article are provided for educational and informational purposes. They are being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. 10 intersections Autumn 2010 Transcritical Encounters in Lacanian Psychoanalysis By Bryan Klausmeyer Johns Hopkins University I. What is Transcendental Criticism? ighteenth-century Königsberg was a curious place for a philosopher to have E spent his life. Obviously, it was neither the city nor even the century in which the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan lived.