DOCSLIB.ORG

USCIRF Report on Blasphemy Laws

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USCIRF Report on Blasphemy Laws VIOLATING RIGHTS ENFORCING THE WORLD’S BLASPHEMY LAWS UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM USCIRF’S MISSION To advance international freedom of religion or belief, by independently assessing and unflinchingly confronting threats to this fundamental right. CHAIR Gayle Manchin VICE CHAIR Tony Perkins VICE CHAIR Anurima Bhargava COMMISSIONERS Gary Bauer James W. Carr Frederick A. Davie Nadine Maenza Johnnie Moore Nury Turkel EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Erin D. Singshinsuk UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CONTENTS 3 About The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 3 Who We Are 3 What Religious Freedom Is 5 Overview 7 Summary of Findings 7 General 8 Human Rights Due Process Violations 7 Blasphemy Laws 9 Mob Violence or Threats of Mob Violence 8 Criminal Blasphemy Law 9 Social Media State Enforcement 8 State-Sponsored Violence 11 Introduction 11 Definition of State Enforcement 13 Study Design & Methodology 13 Study Design 17 Findings 17 Blasphemy Crimes Enforcement: 25 Extrajudicial State Violence Global Trends against Accused Blasphemers 19 Countries with the Highest Reported 30 Official State Religions and Criminal Criminal Blasphemy Enforcement Blasphemy Enforcement 21 Other Laws Employed to 31 Blasphemy and Social Media Enforce Blasphemy Crimes 23 Accused Persons 39 Limitations 39 Study and Research Challenges 41 Country-Specific Challenges Violating Rights: Enforcing the World’s Blasphemy Laws 1 43 Conclusion 45 About the Authors 47 About The Benjamin B. Ferencz Human Rights and Atrocity Prevention Clinic 49 Acknowledgments 51 Annex 1: Changes in Blasphemy Laws Since 2014 55 Annex 2: Criminal Blasphemy Laws as of 2020 93 Annex 3: Research Questions 2 Violating Rights: Enforcing the World’s Blasphemy Laws ABOUT THE UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM WHO WE ARE WHAT RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Inherent in religious freedom is the right to believe or not (USCIRF) is an independent, bipartisan U.S. federal believe as one’s conscience leads, and to live out one’s beliefs government commission created by the 1998 International openly, peacefully, and without fear. Freedom of religion Religious Freedom Act (IRFA). USCIRF uses international or belief is an expansive right that includes the freedoms of standards to monitor violations of religious freedom or belief thought, conscience, expression, association, and assembly. abroad and makes policy recommendations to the President, While religious freedom is America’s first freedom, it also is a the Secretary of State, and Congress. USCIRF Commissioners core human right that international law and treaty recognize; are appointed by the President and Congressional leaders of a necessary component of U.S. foreign policy and America’s both political parties. The Commission’s work is supported commitment to defending democracy and freedom globally; by a professional, nonpartisan staff of regional subject matter and a vital element of national security, critical to ensuring a experts. USCIRF is separate from the State Department, more peaceful, prosperous, and stable world. although the Department’s Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom is a non-voting, ex officio Commissioner. Violating Rights: Enforcing the World’s Blasphemy Laws 3 This page intentionally left blank. 4 Violating Rights: Enforcing the World’s Blasphemy Laws OVERVIEW In this report, the authors examine and compare state implementation and enforcement of criminal laws prohibiting blasphemy (“blasphemy laws”) worldwide over the five-year period between January 2014 and December 2018. The criminal cases this study analyzes represent states’ enforcement of laws that sanction the expression of opinions or actions deemed “blasphemous,” or counter to majority views or religious belief systems. Many such laws impose serious penalties, including prison, forced labor, or death, upon those convicted. Countries throughout the world have and continue to Part II describes the study’s methodology, including the enforce criminal blasphemy laws, often justifying them as systematic collection of cases. It also explains the creation necessary to promote intergroup religious harmony.1 In some of indicators and questions to measure blasphemy law states, however, civilians enforce blasphemy prohibitions enforcement, the coding and decision-making process, and extrajudicially, committing acts of violence in the name the data analysis. of protecting God, religion, and “the sacred.”2 Analyzing Part III examines the study results and highlights select the ways in which states and private, non-state actors findings within the political, cultural, and legal contexts that enforce these laws may assist the public policy community shape how criminal blasphemy laws are implemented and in developing clear, tailored recommendations for areas enforced globally. of criminal legal reform, especially in states with vague laws, harsh penalties, and high levels of enforcement. An Part IV concludes the study, noting some of the study’s analysis of criminal blasphemy cases reported in the news limitations, while also providing a template for future studies and adjudicated in courts identifies the contexts in which of blasphemy laws and enforcement. blasphemy laws may increase the risk of human rights abuses, The report also includes three annexes. Annex 1 reviews through state acts or omissions, indicating the places and recent legislative changes to criminal blasphemy provisions, ways in which targeted law reform could lower that risk. including reforms and repeals in countries globally since Part I is an introduction, defining blasphemy and criminal 2014. Annex 2 compiles the blasphemy laws with criminal blasphemy law enforcement for the purposes of this sanctions in force as of 2020. Finally, Annex 3 includes the study. It also explores the risks of potential abuse in the study tool with the questions/indicators developed to measure implementation and enforcement of these laws. enforcement across country contexts. 1 Joelle Fiss & Jocelyn Getgen Kestenbaum, U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, Respecting Rights? Measuring the World’s Blasphemy Laws 2 (2017). 2 For example, in Pakistan individuals often take justice into their own hands and murder alleged blasphemers. See Helen Haft & Joelle Fiss, How Pakistan’s Blasphemy Laws Trigger Violence, Free Speech Debate (Dec. 10, 2019), https://freespeechdebate.com/2019/12/how-pakistans-blasphemy-laws-trigger-violence/ (last visited Sept. 21, 2020). Violating Rights: Enforcing the World’s Blasphemy Laws 5 This page intentionally left blank. 6 Violating Rights: Enforcing the World’s Blasphemy Laws SUMMARY OF FINDINGS GENERAL BLASPHEMY LAWS • Criminal blasphemy cases often occur in the context of • New or amended blasphemy laws have entered into broader religious freedom violations, such as bombings force in Kazakhstan (2014), Nepal (2017), Oman (2018), and assaults on places of worship,1 desecration of religious Mauritania (2018), Morocco (2018), and Brunei (2019).5 In sites or symbols,2 hate crimes against individuals of a addition, Germany’s blasphemy provision was referenced in minority belief group,3 and other types of physical assaults, a new German technology law (2018). verbal attacks, or harassment.4 • A series of repeals have occurred in Iceland (2015),6 • States also criminalize blasphemous acts through the Norway (2015),7 a province of France (Alsace-Moselle) enforcement of other criminal laws, such as apostasy (2016),8 Malta (2016),9 Denmark (2017),10 Ireland (2018),11 laws, anti-conversion laws, incitement to religious hatred Canada (2018),12 New Zealand (2019),13 Greece (2019),14 and laws (also often referred to as “hate speech” laws), anti- Scotland (2020).15 extremism laws, and even anti-witchcraft laws. • Despite numerous blasphemy law repeals since 2017, • Mob activity, threats, and/or violence around blasphemy researchers identified 13 additional criminal blasphemy law allegations occur both at times when the state enforces the law provisions that had not been included in Respecting Rights? as well as when the state does not act. In some cases, mobs are Measuring the World’s Blasphemy Laws. Not counting stirred by non-state actor groups or individuals. In other cases, repealed laws, researchers identified 84 countries across public officials tolerate civil unrest. In both cases, mobs can the globe with criminal blasphemy laws on the books as of provoke violence, property destruction, injuries and death, 2020.16 (See the following map and Annex 2.) either through intentional targeting or against bystanders. 84 Countries with Criminal Blasphemy Laws on the Books QUEEN ELISABETH ISLANDS GREENLAND USA ICELAND FINLAND NORWAY RUSSIA SWEDEN SCOTLAND ESTONIA CANADA LATVIA NORTHERN IRELAND DENMARK LITHUANIA UNITED IRELAND BELARUS ALEUTIAN ISLANDS KINGDOM GERMANY POLAND NETH. BELGIUM CZECH REP. UKRAINE SLOVAKIA KAZAKHSTAN AUSTRIA MOLDOVA FRANCE SWITZ HUNGARY LIECHTENSTEIN MONGOLIA CROATIA ROMANIA ITALY SAN MARINO SERBIA MONTENEGRO BULGARIA ANDORRA GEORGIA UZBEKISTAN KYRGYZSTAN MACEDONIA NORTH ALBANIA AZERBAIJAN PORTUGAL SARDINIA KOREA ARMENIA TURKMENISTAN USA SPAIN TURKEY TAJIKISTAN SICILY SOUTH SYRIA KOREA JAPAN GREECE LEBANON AFGHANISTAN TUNISIA CHINA MALTA CYPRUS IRAQ IRAN ISRAEL MOROCCO JORDAN KUWAIT ALGERIA PAKISTAN BHUTAN LIBYA BAHRAIN NEPAL WESTER MEXICO UNITED ARAB SAHARA SAUDI QATAR EMIRATES CUBA EGYPT BANGLADESH ARABIA OMAN INDIA DOMINICAN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 Case List
    FRONT COVER 1 3 PEN INTERNATIONAL CHARTER The PEN Charter is based on resolutions passed at its International Congresses and may be summarised as follows: PEN affirms that: 1. Literature knows no frontiers and must remain common currency among people in spite of political or international upheavals. 2. In all circumstances, and particularly in time of war, works of art, the patrimony of humanity at large, should be left untouched by national or political passion. 3. Members of PEN should at all times use what influence they have in favour of good understanding and mutual respect between nations; they pledge themselves to do their utmost to dispel race, class and national hatreds, and to champion the ideal of one humanity living in peace in one world. 4. PEN stands for the principle of unhampered transmission of thought within each nation and between all nations, and members pledge themselves to oppose any form of suppression of freedom of expression in the country and community to which they belong, as well as throughout the world wherever this is possible. PEN declares for a free press and opposes arbitrary censorship in time of peace. It believes that the necessary advance of the world towards a more highly organised political and economic order renders a free criticism of governments, administrations and institutions imperative. And since freedom implies voluntary restraint, members pledge themselves to oppose such evils of a free press as mendacious publication, deliberate falsehood and distortion of facts for political and personal ends. Membership of PEN is open to all qualified writers, editors and translators who subscribe to these aims, without regard to nationality, ethnic origin, language, colour or religion.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Artistic Freedom 2021
    THE STATE OF ARTISTIC FREEDOM 2021 THE STATE OF ARTISTIC FREEDOM 2021 1 Freemuse (freemuse.org) is an independent international non-governmental organisation advocating for freedom of artistic expression and cultural diversity. Freemuse has United Nations Special Consultative Status to the Economic and Social Council (UN-ECOSOC) and Consultative Status with UNESCO. Freemuse operates within an international human rights and legal framework which upholds the principles of accountability, participation, equality, non-discrimination and cultural diversity. We document violations of artistic freedom and leverage evidence-based advocacy at international, regional and national levels for better protection of all people, including those at risk. We promote safe and enabling environments for artistic creativity and recognise the value that art and culture bring to society. Working with artists, art and cultural organisations, activists and partners in the global south and north, we campaign for and support individual artists with a focus on artists targeted for their gender, race or sexual orientation. We initiate, grow and support locally owned networks of artists and cultural workers so their voices can be heard and their capacity to monitor and defend artistic freedom is strengthened. ©2021 Freemuse. All rights reserved. Design and illustration: KOPA Graphic Design Studio Author: Freemuse Freemuse thanks those who spoke to us for this report, especially the artists who took risks to take part in this research. We also thank everyone who stands up for the human right to artistic freedom. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of February 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansour Ossanlu
    Celebrating Nowruz Nowruz Haft-sin table 1) What is Nowruz? Nowruz [pronounced NO-ROOZ- in Persian means "New-day"] is the Iranian New Year and marks the first day of Spring. Nowruz begins precisely with the beginning of Spring on the vernal equinox; on the 1st day of Farvardin of the Iranian solar calendar which is usually March 20th or 21st. It is the biggest holiday celebrated by Iranians; a time of joy, celebration with family and friends, shared by people of all faiths that trace their history back through the centuries to the ancient Mesopotamian civilization and the Persian Empire. It has been celebrated for at least 3,000 years and is rooted in the rituals and traditions of the Zoroastrian religion. 2) Plan a Nowruz Event Nowruz is an opportunity to not only bring awareness to the human rights situation in Iran, but to bring communities together to celebrate, learn about Iranian culture, and make new friends. On such a joyful occasion, so many Iranians are behind bars and away from their families; their seats at the celebrations are empty. Help let them know that we remember them, and are thinking about them by writing on behalf of Iranian prisoners and/or sending solidarity messages to their families. In the past several years, successful events were held in Toronto and a couple of other Canadian cities. This year, we are hoping for even more people across Canada and around the world to mark this occasion and we encourage you to get involved. If you have been thinking about how you can raise awareness amongst your Amnesty group, your community or even your friends, think about organizing a Nowruz gathering.
    [Show full text]
  • Freemuse-The-State-Of-Artistic-Freedom
    THE STATE OF ARTISTIC FREEDOM 2018 FREEMUSE THE STATE OF ARTISTIC FREEDOM 2018 1 Freemuse is an independent international organisation advocating for and defending freedom of artistic expression. We believe that at the heart of violations of artistic freedom is the effort to silence opposing or less preferred views and values by those in power – politically, religiously or societally – mostly due to fear of their transformative effect. With this assumption, we can address root causes rather than just symptoms – if we hold violators accountable. Our approach to artistic freedom is human rights-based as it provides an international legal framework and lays out the principles of accountability, equality and non-discrimination, and participation. ©2018 Freemuse. All rights reserved. ISSN 2596-5190 Design: www.NickPurser.com Infographics: sinnwerkstatt Medienagentur Author: Srirak Plipat Research team: Dwayne Mamo, David Herrera, Ayodele Ganiu, Jasmina Lazovic, Paige Collings, Kaja Ciosek and Joann Caloz Michaëlis Freemuse would like to thank Sara Wyatt, Deji Olatoye, Andra Matei, Sarah Hossain, Shaheen Buneri, Irina Aksenova and Magnus Ag for their review, research assistance and feedback. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of February 2018. Nevertheless, Freemuse cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. This report is kindly supported by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Fritt Ord Norway. THE STATE OF ARTISTIC FREEDOM 2018 FREEMUSE THE STATE OF ARTISTIC FREEDOM 2018 3 I draw and I paint whenever “ I can.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Artistic Freedom?
    ARTS RIGHTS JUSTICE Oberservatory Study I 1 Arts. Protecting and Promoting Artistic Freedom Imprint Copyright © 2019 Foundation University of Hildesheim Department of Cultural Policy UNESCO Chair “Cultural Policy for the Arts in Development” Universitätsplatz 1, 31141 Hildesheim (Germany) Written by Sara Wyatt and Ole Reitov Proofread and editing by Linda van de Vijver Design and typesetting by Glatte.info Printed in Germany Visit www.arts-rights-justice.de Licensing The text of this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDe- rivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. The opinions expressed and arguments employed within this work are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation University of Hildesheim, Department of Cultural Policy. Created with the support of the Federal Foreign Office (Germany) PREFACE Artistic creation, artistic freedom and the JUSTICE Library aims to collect, create access role of artists must be considered alongside to and disseminate documents related to the human rights and freedoms in society. To this promotion and protection of artistic freedom end, the ARTS RIGHTS JUSTICE Programme around the globe. We securely host and facili- seeks to convey and professionalise skills, tate access to all kinds of documents related ensure the exchange of knowledge, make the to this field in the database of the University most of multiplier effects, and build expertise of Hildesheim. This Library is online and open on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Freemuse Annual Statistics on Censorship and Attacks on Artistic Freedom in 2016 1
    ART UNDER THREAT FREEMUSE ANNUAL STATISTICS ON CENSORSHIP AND ATTACKS ON ARTISTIC FREEDOM IN 2016 1 ART UNDER THREAT FREEMUSE ANNUAL STATISTICS ON CENSORSHIP AND ATTACKS ON ARTISTIC FREEDOM IN 2016 ART UNDER THREAT FREEMUSE ANNUAL STATISTICS ON CENSORSHIP AND ATTACKS ON ARTISTIC FREEDOM IN 2016 3 ART UNDER THREAT FREEMUSE ANNUAL STATISTICS ON CENSORSHIP AND ATTACKS ON ARTISTIC FREEDOM IN 2016 Published February 2017 4 ART UNDER THREAT FREEMUSE ANNUAL STATISTICS ON CENSORSHIP AND ATTACKS ON ARTISTIC FREEDOM IN 2016 PUBLISHED IN 2017 BY FREEMUSE JEMTELANDSGADE 1 — DK 2300 COPENHAGEN S, DENMARK © FREEMUSE 2017 EDITORS: OLE REITOV & RIKKE NAGELL STATISTICS COMPILATION: RIKKE NAGELL GRAPHICS & COPY EDITOR: DWAYNE MAMO ADVOCACY: MAGNUS AG DESIGN & LAYOUT: WWW.NICKPURSERDESIGN.COM FREEMUSE WOULD LIKE TO THANK AUSTIN DACEY AND THE ARTISTS, INTERNATIONAL PEN, THE ARTSFEX NETWORK AND THE STRINGERS WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THE DOCUMENTATION AND VERIFICATION OF THE STATISTICS. FREEMUSE IS AN INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL MEMBERSHIP ORGANISATION ADVOCATING AND DEFENDING ARTISTIC FREEDOM. FREEMUSE HAS SPECIAL CONSULTATIVE STATUS WITH THE UNITED NATIONS SINCE 2012. FREEMUSE IS KINDLY SUPPORTED BY THE SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY, SIDA; THE CULTURE SECTION OF THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, NORWAY; AND FRITT ORD, NORWAY. ART UNDER THREAT FREEMUSE ANNUAL STATISTICS ON CENSORSHIP AND ATTACKS ON ARTISTIC FREEDOM IN 2016 5 CONTENTS * Click on the section titles to be taken to that part of the report FOREWORD 7 PRESENTING THE FIGURES 8 WHAT
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Joscelyn • Stephen F. Hayes
    PRIME-TIME JOHN MCCORMACK CONSPIRACY THEORY JUNE 5, 2017 $5.99 WINNING THE 9/11 WARS THOMAS JOSCELYN • STEPHEN F. HAYES WEEKLYSTANDARD.COM The Weekly Standard 2017 European Charter Cruise Join us September 2-10 for this luxury 8-night private charter cruise—with accommodations for just 212 guests!—departing Dublin, Ireland, with stops in France, Spain, and Portugal. This private charter cruise includes two days along the Normandy coast with the opportunity for private tours of the D-Day beaches and the Normandy American Cemetery. NORMANDY AMERICAN CEMETERY OMAHA BEACH SAINTE-MÈRE-ÉGLISE Exclusive Normandy Experience: Cruise to the frontlines of history with expert insights from featured speakers: ANDREW ROBERTS GEN. JACK KEANE British Historian Retired 4-Star U.S. Army General Bestselling Author Fox News Military Analyst Book Now at WeeklyStandardCruise.com 888-471-3882 Contents June 5, 2017 • Volume 22, Number 37 2 The Scrapbook Social scientists unbound, Prince Charles the non-prophet, & more 5 Casual Lee Smith’s elder abuse 6 Editorials Winning the 9/11 Wars • Generation Trump? • Indefensible Articles 10 The Republican To-Do List BY FRED BARNES Congress may still accomplish big things 11 Prime-Time Conspiracy Theory BY JOHN MCCORMACK The Seth Rich nonsense and how it spread 13 They Deserve Our Gratitude BY JONATHAN V. LAST Serving the country by serving Trump 2 14 Hubris in the U.K. BY ANDREW STUTTAFORD Theresa May’s ‘dementia tax’ misstep 16 Misreporting Iran BY KEllY JANE TORRANCE The ‘moderate’ is also a liar with blood on his hands
    [Show full text]
  • Iran | Freedom House
    3/26/2020 Iran | Freedom House FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2017 Iran 17 NOT FREE /100 Political Rights 7 /40 Civil Liberties 10 /60 LAST YEAR'S SCORE & STATUS /100 Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. https://freedomhouse.org/country/iran/freedom-world/2017 1/14 3/26/2020 Iran | Freedom House Overview The Islamic Republic of Iran holds elections regularly, but they fall short of democratic standards due to the role of the hard-line Guardian Council, which disqualifies all candidates deemed insufficiently loyal to the clerical establishment. Ultimate power rests in the hands of the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the unelected institutions under his control. Key Developments in 2016 In February, Iran held elections for the parliament and the Assembly of Experts, the body tasked with appointing and monitoring the supreme leader. Most reformist candidates were disqualified by the Guardian Council. In May, prominent human rights defender Narges Mohammadi was sentenced to 16 years in prison on national security charges stemming from her activism, including membership in a group that aims to reduce the high number of executions in Iran. The sentence was upheld on appeal in September. In August, Iranian authorities hanged 25 Sunni Muslim prisoners who had been convicted on terrorism-related charges; human rights organizations and lawyers representing some of the men cited a pattern of due process violations in the cases. Iran also continued to impose the death penalty on juvenile offenders, including a prisoner who had been convicted of raping a teenage boy when he was 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2016 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is a theocratic republic with a Shia Islamic political system based on “velayat-e faqih” (“guardianship of the jurist” or “rule by the jurisprudent”). Shia clergy, most notably the “Rahbar” (“supreme jurisprudent” or “supreme leader”) and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominated key power structures. While mechanisms for popular election existed within the structure of the state, the supreme leader held significant influence over the legislative and executive branches of government through unelected councils under his authority and held constitutional authority over the judiciary, the government-run media, and the armed forces. The supreme leader also indirectly controlled the internal security forces and other key institutions. Since 1989 the supreme leader has been Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In 2013 voters elected Hassan Rouhani president who, on December 19, issued a 120 article Charter on Citizens’ Rights. In the last parliamentary and Assembly of Experts elections held this year, candidate vetting by the unelected Guardian Council and restrictions on the media limited the freedom and fairness of these elections. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. The most significant human rights (HR) problems were severe restrictions on civil liberties, including the freedoms of assembly, association, speech, religion, and press. Other HR problems included abuse of due process combined with use of capital punishment for crimes that do not meet the requirements of due process, as well as cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; and disregard for the physical integrity of persons, whom authorities arbitrarily and unlawfully detained, tortured, or killed.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2020 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is an authoritarian theocratic republic with a Shia Islamic political system based on velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist). Shia clergy, most notably the rahbar (supreme leader), and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate key power structures. The supreme leader is the head of state. The members of the Assembly of Experts are nominally directly elected in popular elections. The assembly selects and may dismiss the supreme leader. The candidates for the Assembly of Experts, however, are vetted by the Guardian Council (see below) and are therefore selected indirectly by the supreme leader himself. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has held the position since 1989. He has direct or indirect control over the legislative and executive branches of government through unelected councils under his authority. The supreme leader holds constitutional authority over the judiciary, government-run media, and other key institutions. While mechanisms for popular election exist for the president, who is head of government, and for the Islamic Consultative Assembly (parliament or majles), the unelected Guardian Council vets candidates, routinely disqualifying them based on political or other considerations, and controls the election process. The supreme leader appoints half of the 12-member Guardian Council, while the head of the judiciary (who is appointed by the supreme leader) appoints the other half. Presidential elections held in 2017 and parliamentary elections held during the year were not considered free and fair. The supreme leader holds ultimate authority over all security agencies. Several agencies share responsibility for law enforcement and maintaining order, including the Ministry of Intelligence and Security and law enforcement forces under the Interior Ministry, which report to the president, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which reports directly to the supreme leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2020 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is an authoritarian theocratic republic with a Shia Islamic political system based on velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist). Shia clergy, most notably the rahbar (supreme leader), and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate key power structures. The supreme leader is the head of state. The members of the Assembly of Experts are nominally directly elected in popular elections. The assembly selects and may dismiss the supreme leader. The candidates for the Assembly of Experts, however, are vetted by the Guardian Council (see below) and are therefore selected indirectly by the supreme leader himself. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has held the position since 1989. He has direct or indirect control over the legislative and executive branches of government through unelected councils under his authority. The supreme leader holds constitutional authority over the judiciary, government-run media, and other key institutions. While mechanisms for popular election exist for the president, who is head of government, and for the Islamic Consultative Assembly (parliament or majles), the unelected Guardian Council vets candidates, routinely disqualifying them based on political or other considerations, and controls the election process. The supreme leader appoints half of the 12-member Guardian Council, while the head of the judiciary (who is appointed by the supreme leader) appoints the other half. Presidential elections held in 2017 and parliamentary elections held during the year were not considered free and fair. The supreme leader holds ultimate authority over all security agencies. Several agencies share responsibility for law enforcement and maintaining order, including the Ministry of Intelligence and Security and law enforcement forces under the Interior Ministry, which report to the president, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which reports directly to the supreme leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Algemeen Ambtsbericht Iran Februari 2021
    Algemeen ambtsbericht Iran Datum Februari 2021 Pagina 1 van 141 Algemeen ambtsbericht Iran | Februari 2021 Colofon Plaats Den Haag Opgesteld door Afdeling Ambtsberichten (DAF/AB) Pagina 2 van 141 Algemeen ambtsbericht Iran | Februari 2021 Inhoudsopgave Colofon ....................................................................................................... 2 Inhoudsopgave ............................................................................................. 3 Inleiding ...................................................................................................... 5 1 Politieke en veiligheidssituatie .................................................................... 6 1.1 Politieke situatie ........................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Politiek(e)(-bestuurlijke) ontwikkelingen .......................................................... 6 1.1.2 COVID-19 ................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Veiligheidssituatie ........................................................................................ 16 1.2.1 Protesten van november 2019 ....................................................................... 16 1.2.2 Explosies en branden in de zomer van 2020..................................................... 18 1.2.3 Koerdistan, Kermanshah en West-Azerbeidzjan ................................................ 19 1.2.4 Khuzestan .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]