Axe Head Vs Steel Experiments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Axe Head Vs Steel Experiments Comparing Axe Heads of Stone, Bronze, and Steel: Studies in Experimental Archaeology Author(s): James R. Mathieu and Daniel A. Meyer Source: Journal of Field Archaeology, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Autumn, 1997), pp. 333-351 Published by: Boston University Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/530689 Accessed: 26/03/2010 04:19 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=boston. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Boston University is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Field Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org 333 Comparwng Axe Heads of Stone, Bronze, and Steel: Studies sn Expersmental Archaeologr JamesR. Mathieu Universityof Pennsylvania Philadelphia,Pennsylvania Daniel A. Meyer Universityof Calgary Calgary,Alberta, Canada Thispaper presents inferences based on theresults of an experimentalproject comparing theeffectiveness of stone,bronze, and steelaxes in felling trees.The study shows that bronzeis as efJicientas steelforthis task, and thereforethe two material types can becon- sideredequivalent when comparing technologies. We support theXindings of otherstudies indicatingthat metalaxes are moreefJicient than stone axes in a numberof waysother than effortexpended. Other variables that affecttree felling egfciency are discussed.Tree type,tree diameter, and axe typeare themost important, but otherfactorsmay also be significant.The use of regionallyspeciJic estimates for treefelling time is sug,gestedwhen makingcultural inferences based upon experimental data. Introduction which demonstratedthat buildingone of the Southwest's Archaeologistsask many questions about the techno- most impressiveprehistoric structures did not requireex- logical capabilitiesof people in the past. They frequently traordinaryamounts of labor, and thereforea postulated encounterdirect evidence of past technologiesin the form complexsocial organization is not necessarilyindicated. of tools or other artifacts,and the remainsof structuresor Much experimentalarchaeology involving tree felling featuresbuilt by people using those tools. Understanding and axe-use studies has taken place in the past 100 years the effectivenessof tools or a technologicalcomplex often (Sehested 1884; Smith 1891; Montelius 1906; Pond requiresa knowledgeof how the tools were used and how 1930; Morris 1939; Hyenstrand1969; Townsend 1969; efficientlythey fulfilledtheir purpose. Bordaz 1970; Heider 1970; Semenov 1964; Saraydarand One way archaeologistshave approachedthe effective- Shimada1971,1973; Kozak1972; Godelierand Garanger ness of ancient tools is through replicativeor "imitative" 1973; Coles 1973, 1979b; Coles, Heal, and Orme 1978; experiments(Ascher 1961: 793-795), whereby modern Carneiro 1979a, 1979b; Harding and Young 1979; people employancient technology in orderto simulatethe Steensberg1980; Olausson1982, 1983; Orme and Coles work of past peoples. In spite of Schiffer's(1976: 5-7) 1983; Coles and Orme 1985; J0rgensen1985). Experi- criticismof this approach,replication can give insightsinto mental testing of the effectivenessof axes has involved variousaspects of past societies.For example,experiments using them in variousways to test plausiblefunctions. The can be used to estimatethe time requiredto build struc- goal of such studies is to learn as much as possible about tures or clear fields. Archaeologistscan use this informa- the capabilitiesof axes and to get a better idea of their tion to estimatethe amount of labor expenditureneeded potential as tools. These experimentshelp researchersto to accomplishcertain tasks, to inferhow manypeople such determine the range of uses of an artifact,but do not enterpriseswould require,and to explorethe social impli- conclusivelydetermine an artifact'smain or sole use. As cationsbehind the needed laborforce, includingthe social Schiffer(1978: 236) correctlypoints out, even in our own and organizationalrequirements needed to mobilize a society,a tool's stated primaryfunction is certainlynot its body of laborers.One exampleis StephenLekson's (1984) only use. study of Pueblo Bonito in Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, This paper addressestwo main issues and reachescon- 334 Comparin,gAjce Heads/Mathieu and Meyer clusions based upon an experimentusing stone, bronze, axes at felling, althoughresearchers found that stone axes and steel axes. First, we compare bronze axes with steel were capableof felling and clearingeven large trees. This axes in terms of efficiency(as measuredby time) in felling apparentexhaustion of the usefulnessof experimentaltree trees. Second, we compare metal axes to stone axes in felling led to a focus on other aspectsof the studyof axes. termsof efficiency.We made comparisonsin as completea The majortype of analysisundertaken at this time may be manneras possible, controllingas many variableswith as calledstudies of tracesof activity.Traces of activityinclude large a sample as possible, subject to constraintsof time, evidenceindicating the use of an axe to createan item or expense, and ability.Where variablescould not be con- structure,or evidence indicatingthe use of a particular trolled,they were noted and their effectswere discussed. type of axe. For example,Deborah Olausson, following in the footstepsof Semenov(1964), studieduse wearon flint PreviousResearch axes and examinedthe range of activitiesthey could be Experimentationwith stone axes began in the 19th used for beyond tree-felling (Olausson 1982, 1983). century and determined that stone "axes," whether of Other researchers(Coutts 1977; Orme and Coles 1983; chippedor ground stone, were definitelycapable of pene- Coles and Orme 1985) have studied the marksmade by trating timber and felling trees (Smith 1891; examples variousaxe-like tools. Coutts correlatedthe "morphologi- cited in Clark 1945: 68). After the turn of the century, cal characteristicsof wood chips freshlycut" (1977: 67) experimentationwas uncommon, with the exception of with the typesof adzesused in the cuttingin an attemptto the work of Pond (1930) and Morris (1939), who each infer the type of adzes used in the productionof archae- felled one smalltree. When experimentationwith axeswas ologicallypreserved woodchips. Likewise, Coles and Orme resumed in the 1950s, most notably by Danes (Iversen (1985; Orme and Coles 1983) noted axe "signatures"on 1956; Steensberg1957; J0rgensen1985), its goals were workedwood "sometimespoint[ing] to individualtools" wide-rangingand its methods more scientific.These ex- (1985: 27). These studies expandedthe field of experi- perimentersfelled large numbers of trees with polished mentationwith stone axes as they attemptedto correlate flint axes and recordedmuch more informationthan pre- specificbehaviors with archaeologicalremains, and devel- vious investigators.Concern was placed on the abilityto oped more rigorous scientific controls for such experi- clearacres of forestsas opposed to fellingsingle trees. Data ments. of this natureallowed researchersto estimatethe amount of land that a prehistoricfarmer could feasiblyclear and EfficiencyCompolrisons cultivatein a given periodof time. Tree fellingstudies also Six studieshave attemptedexperimental comparisons of allowed the estimationof labor requiredfor other activi- steel versusstone (Carneiro1979b; Godelierand Garanger ties, such as the constructionof wood henge monuments 1973; Saraydarand Shimada 1971, 1973; Steensberg (Renfrew 1973), or other building, as in the exampleof 1980; Townsend 1969). Three were done on standing Pueblo Bonito cited above (Lekson 1984). trees using steel axes and stone adzes (Godelier and During the 1960s and 1970s, numerous experiments Garanger 1973; Steensberg 1980; Townsend 1969). and observationson tree felling were made. Ethnogra- These studies, which employed time as the yardstickfor phers returned from the field with accounts of people comparison,showed steel to be betweentwo and four and making,hafting, and using stone axes or adzes (Carneiro one half times fasterthan stone. 1974, 1979a; Godelierand Garanger1973; Heider 1970; The fourth study (Carneiro1979b) observed the time Kozak 1972; Steensberg 1980; Townsend 1969) . Re- requiredto clearone-sixth of an acre(674.5 sq m) offorest searchersquantified their trials and created formulae to with steel axes. Carneiroalso verified the results of his calculate time required to fell trees (Carneiro 1979a; earlierstudy (Carneiro1979a), demonstratingthe effect Townsend 1969). Attempts were made to measure the that tree hardnesshas on felling time. Carneiro(1979b: efficiencyof stone axes or adzes
Recommended publications
  • Fire Bow Drill
    Making Fire With The Bow Drill When you are first learning bow-drill fire-making, you must make conditions and your bow drill set such that the chance of getting a coal is the greatest. If you do not know the feeling of a coal beginning to be born then you will never be able to master the more difficult scenarios. For this it is best to choose the “easiest woods” and practice using the set in a sheltered location such as a garage or basement, etc. Even if you have never gotten a coal before, it is best to get the wood from the forest yourself. Getting it from a lumber yard is easy but you learn very little. Also, getting wood from natural sources ensures you do not accidentally get pressure-treated wood which, when caused to smoulder, is highly toxic. Here are some good woods for learning with (and good for actual survival use too): ► Eastern White Cedar ► Staghorn Sumac ► Most Willows ► Balsam Fir ► Aspens and Poplars ► Basswood ► Spruces There are many more. These are centered more on the northeastern forest communities of North America. A good tree identification book will help you determine potential fire-making woods. Also, make it a common practice to feel and carve different woods when you are in the bush. A good way to get good wood for learning on is to find a recently fallen branch or trunk that is relatively straight and of about wrist thickness or bigger. Cut it with a saw. It is best if the wood has recently fallen off the tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of a Collection 01 Perforated Stone Objects, from the Garioch, Aberdeenshire
    6 16 PROCEEDING SOCIETYE TH F O S , FEBRUARY 9, 1903. III. NOTICE OF A COLLECTION 01 PERFORATED STONE OBJECTS, FROM THE GARIOCH, ABERDEENSHIRE. BY J. GRAHAM CALLANDER, F.S.A. SOOT. Many perforated article f stono s f greateo e r leso r s antiquity have been found, the use of which we have no difficulty in defining. Among such article e stonar s e axes, stone hammers, whorls, beads d sinkan , - stones for nets or lines; but this collection of perforated stones from Central Aberdeenshire seems to be quite different from any of the recog- nised types. Localities.—The collection, which consist f sixty-fivo s e specimenss ha , been gathered during the last five years in the Garioch district of Aber- deenshire from eight different localitie n fivi s e parishes :—Elevee ar n from Newbigging, parish of Culsalmond ; one is from the Kirkyard of Culsalmond; five are from the adjoining farms of Jericho and Colpy, Culsalmond e froar m o Johnstonetw ; , paris f Leslio hs froi e me ;on Cushieston, parish of Rayne; one is from Lochend, Barra, parish of Bourtie; thre froe ear m Harlaw, paris f Chapeho f Garioco l fortyd an h; - one are from Logie-Elphinstone estate, also in Chapel of Garioch. e specimenth l Al s have bee e ploughnth turney b , p nonu d e having been found associated with burials or dwelling sites; at the same time many flint implements have been foun e localitiemosn th di f o t s named, especiall firste th , n yi third last-mentioned an , d ones, these I believe, , having been more thoroughly searched.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Service Features of Buildings and Fire Protection Systems
    Fire Service Features of Buildings and Fire Protection Systems OSHA 3256-09R 2015 Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing enforcement of the standards developed under the Act; by assisting and encouraging the States in their efforts to assure safe and healthful working conditions; by providing for research, information, education, and training in the field of occupational safety and health.” This publication provides a general overview of a particular standards- related topic. This publication does not alter or determine compliance responsibilities which are set forth in OSHA standards and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Moreover, because interpretations and enforcement policy may change over time, for additional guidance on OSHA compliance requirements the reader should consult current administrative interpretations and decisions by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the courts. Material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission. Source credit is requested but not required. This information will be made available to sensory-impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 693-1999; teletypewriter (TTY) number: 1-877-889-5627. This guidance document is not a standard or regulation, and it creates no new legal obligations. It contains recommendations as well as descriptions of mandatory safety and health standards. The recommendations are advisory in nature, informational in content, and are intended to assist employers in providing a safe and healthful workplace. The Occupational Safety and Health Act requires employers to comply with safety and health standards and regulations promulgated by OSHA or by a state with an OSHA-approved state plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiocarbon Dates 1993-1998
    RADIOCARBONDATES RADIOCARBONDATES RADIOCARBON DATES This volume holds a datelist of 1063 radiocarbon determinations carried out between 1993 and 1998 on behalf of the Ancient Monuments Laboratory of English Heritage. It contains supporting information about the samples and the sites producing them, a comprehensive bibliography, and two indexes for reference from samples funded by English Heritage and analysis. An introduction provides discussion of the character and taphonomy between 1993 and 1998 of the dated samples and information about the methods used for the analyses reported and their calibration. The datelist has been collated from information provided by the submitters of the samples and the dating laboratories. Many of the sites and projects from which dates have been obtained are now published, although developments in statistical methodologies for the interpretation of radiocarbon dates since these measurements were made may allow revised chronological models to be constructed on the basis of these dates. The purpose of this volume is to provide easy access to the raw scientific and contextual data which may be used in further research. Alex Bayliss, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Gordon Cook, Gerry McCormac, and Peter Marshall Front cover:Wharram Percy cemetery excavations. (©Wharram Research Project) Back cover:The Scientific Dating Research Team visiting Stonehenge as part of Science, Engineering, and Technology Week,March 1996. Left to right: Stephen Hoper (The Queen’s University, Belfast), Christopher Bronk Ramsey (Oxford
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Scale of Stone Axe Production: a Case Study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia Alexey Tarasov 1 and Sergey Stafeev 2
    Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia Alexey Tarasov 1 and Sergey Stafeev 2 1. Institute of Linguistics, Literature and History, Pushkinskaya st.11, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia, Email: [email protected] 2. Institute of Applied Mathematical Research, Pushkinskaya st.11, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia, Email: [email protected] Abstract: The industry of metatuff axes and adzes on the western coast of Onega Lake (Eneolithic period, ca. 3500 – 1500 cal. BC) allows assuming some sort of craft specialization. Excavations of a workshop site Fofanovo XIII, conducted in 2010-2011, provided an extremely large assemblage of artefacts (over 350000 finds from just 30 m2, mostly production debitage). An attempt to estimate the output of production within the excavated area is based on experimental data from a series of replication experiments. Mass-analysis with the aid of image recognition software was used to obtain raw data from flakes from excavations and experiments. Statistical evaluation assures that the experimental results can be used as a basement for calculations. According to the proposed estimation, some 500 – 1000 tools could have been produced here, and this can be qualified as an evidence of “mass-production”. Keywords: Lithic technology; Neolithic; Eneolithic; Karelia; Fennoscandia; stone axe; adze; gouge; craft specialization; mass-analysis; image recognition 1. Introduction 1.1 Chopping tools of the Russian Karelian type; Cultural context and chronological framework This article is devoted to quite a small and narrow question, which belongs to a much wider set of problems associated with an industry of wood-chopping tools of the so-called Russian Karelian (Eastern Karelian) type from the territory of the present-day Republic of Karelia of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological and Geochemical Investigation of Flint Sources In
    Archaeological and geochemical investigation of flint sources in Britain and Ireland By Seosaimhín Áine Bradley A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire MARCH 2017 1 ABSTRACT This study investigates the archaeological use of flint in Britain and Ireland from the Mesolithic to the Bronze Age through geochemical analysis of flint samples obtained from the major areas of chalk geology within these islands (Northern, Southern, Transitional, and Northern Ireland), and provenancing of artefactual assemblages. Recent approaches to provenancing flint have demonstrated that this is indeed possible, however this approach encompasses a larger study area and provides a comparison of two methodologies, one destructive (acid digestion ICP-MS) and one non-destructive (pXRF). Acid digestion ICP-MS and pXRF are capable of detecting a range of elements in a given sample, although they each have specific advantages and disadvantages when applied to archaeological material. There are three main research questions that are addressed in this thesis: ● Determine geochemical composition of flint samples from primary chalk outcrops; ● Assess differences between flint from different chalk provinces; ● Compare acid digestion ICP-MS and pXRF in achieving these objectives. The results indicate that flint from the major areas of chalk geology in Britain and Ireland can be distinguished using the methodologies stated above. There are some difficulties in distinguishing between the Southern and Northern Ireland chalk province flint samples, however the samples from the Northern chalk province are very well differentiated. Archaeological assemblages chosen from throughout the study area and from a wide chronological span were sampled using pXRF and subjected to statistical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Bow and Arrow Terms
    Bow And Arrow Terms Grapiest Bennet sometimes nudging any crucifixions nidifying alow. Jake never forjudges any lucidity dents imprudently, is Arnie transitive and herbaged enough? Miles decrypt fugato. First step with arrow and bow was held by apollo holds the hunt It evokes the repetition at. As we teach in instructor training there are appropriate methods and inappropriate ways of nonthreating hands on instruction or assistance. Have junior leaders or parents review archery terms and safety. Which country is why best at archery? Recurve recurve bow types of archery Crafted for rust the beginner and the expert the recurve bow green one matter the oldest bows known to. Shaped to bow that is lots of arrows. Archery is really popular right now. Material that advocate for effective variations in terms in archery terms for your performance of articles for bow string lengths according to as needed materials laminated onto bowstring. Bow good arrow Lyrics containing the term. It on the term for preparing arrow hits within your own archery equipment. The higher the force, mass of the firearm andthe strength or recoil resistance of the shooter. Nyung took up archery at the tender age of nine. REI informed members there free no dividend to people around. Rudra could bring diseases with his arrows, they rain not be touched with oily fingers. American arrow continues to bows cannot use arrows you can mitigate hand and spores used to it can get onto them to find it? One arrow and arrows, and hybrid longbows are red and are? Have participants PRACTICE gripping a rate with sister light touch.
    [Show full text]
  • Rushcliffe Scout District
    RUSHCLIFFE DISTRICT SCOUTS CARE AND USE OF KNIVES, SAWS AND AXES Compiled by D. Howard © Rushcliffe Scout Council Registered as a Charity, Number 522469 January 2016 1 Axes 11 Care of axes 14 Chopping to length 15 Felling Axe, The 15 Hand Axe, The 15 Safety rules. 13 Splitting 15 Using the Axe 15 Knives 7 Sharpening 7 Safety, General 5 Saws 8 Before you start. 9 Sawing to length. 9 When finished. 10 Sharpening Equipment 6 Tree trimming and felling 17 Felling a Tree 17 Trimming 19 WHAT IS AND ISN'T LEGAL 3 Advice from the Scout Association 3 Picture Credits D. Howard Pictures on pages 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 18 top, 19 bottom, 20 bottom. Pictures from ‘The Scout And His Axe’ The Patrol Books N0.26 by John Thurman. Pub. The Boy Scouts Association 1963 on pages 10, 16 bottom, 17 right, 18 right, 19top and revised pictures on pages 14, 16 top, 17 left, 18 left. 2 WHAT IS AND ISN'T LEGAL - A BRIEF SUMMARY. The maximum penalty for an adult carrying a knife is four years in prison and a fine of £5000. it is illegal for any shop to sell a knife of any kind (including cutlery and kitchen knives) to anyone under the age of 18. it is generally an offence to carry a knife in public without good reason or lawful authority (for example, a good reason is a chef on the way to work carrying their own knives). knives with blades that are locked open are illegal unless there is a good reason for carrying them.
    [Show full text]
  • Preview This Book!
    The Art of Felling Timber by Roy W Hauser illustrated by Kerith Reid Table of Contents Equipment List for Felling Timber 1 Chainsaw and Equipment Maintenance 5 Timber Felling (Refresher) 9 The Mechanical Applications for Felling Timber 21 Watch-Out Scenarios 57 Bucking Trees (Refresher) 61 The Mechanical Applications for Bucking Trees 65 Hand Signal & Verbal Communication Terminology 83 Glossary 87 Training Simulation 91 Appendix 101 Other Resource Material for Training 109 Company Recommendations 111 Closing 123 About the Author 125 vii The correct equipment is the key to felling timber. Equipment List for Felling Timber 1 Equipment List for Felling Timber Note: The equipment in the list below can be split up between the felling team members, the feller, and felling partner. This is for weight distribution, hiking, or helicopter flight time. Not having the proper equipment can create unsafe conditions. Power Head: The power head that a feller should use is determined by the size of tree that the felling team will be working with. Have a larger power head available for large tree scenarios. Chainsaw Bar: The size of the chainsaw bar should also reflect the size of the trees the feller will be working with. Have larger chainsaw bars available for larger tree scenarios. Felling Axe: The felling team should have an axe head that weighs between 4 and 5 pounds; it should also have a short, strong handle. A shock bumper placed under the axe head will deflect impact with the wedges when striking them with the felling axe. Felling Wedges: Carry 3 to 6 wedges to allow for double stacking if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Cut No. 5
    www.logosol.com News for the Outdoor Craftsman • No. 5 - March 2007 The Winning Projects Meet Sweden’s most Famous Lumberman of the Logosol Contest! Tycho Loo, teacher in building log homes comes to the Out- The fi rst woodworking contest is complete, and the results are in. Read about all the door Craftsman School! exciting project - and meet the winner! Page 10, 11, 12 Page 4 Logosol Sawmill With its Own Railway Bo Malmborg in Sweden, has spent his entire adult life fulfi lling a dream. His private railway is 2.3 kilometers (1.4 miles) long. Bo uses it to carry logs from the forest to his Lo- gosol Sawmill. Page 14-15 MOULDING From Log to Harp With the Logosol Big Mill NETWORK Meet a Harp builder Dave Kortier recently added a chain saw and Logosol Big Mill to member! his shop in Minnesota. “This mill is the perfect tool”, he claims. new Page 8-9 Join the Logosol A chapter from Project Contest! our Best-Seller! Back page Hunting for good Knowledge Makes logs is just like going Good Mouldings! fi shing. Page 6 You always hope you will come Do You Love the home with a prize catch! Scent of Freshly Here are some tips on how to Report from the fi rst sawmill class! fi nd them.... Cut Wood? Page 3 Page 5 Page 5 To the Outdoor Craftsman What an exciting time since the last issue! Plenty of chang- es here at Bjorklund Ranch. I just installed my fi rst fl oor, made from six species of recycled urban hardwood logs; yellow & red eucalyptus, sycamore, live oak, black walnut, and acacia koa.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Axe Studies in Ireland
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271899048 Stone Axe Studies in Ireland Article · January 2014 DOI: 10.1017/S0079497X00004242 CITATIONS READS 11 212 3 authors: Alison Sheridan Gabriel Cooney National Museums Scotland University College Dublin 124 PUBLICATIONS 1,411 CITATIONS 44 PUBLICATIONS 294 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Eoin Grogan National University of Ireland, Maynooth 6 PUBLICATIONS 56 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: North Roes Felsite Project View project Scottish archaeology View project All content following this page was uploaded by Alison Sheridan on 02 March 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 1992, pp. 389-416 Stone Axe Studies in Ireland By ALISON SHERIDAN1, GABRIEL COONEY2 and EOIN GROGAN3 This paper starts by outlining the history of stone axe studies in Ireland, from their antiquarian beginnings to 1990. It then offers a critical review of the current state of knowledge concerning the numbers, distribution, findspot contexts, morphology, size, associated finds, dating and raw materials of stone axes. Having proposed an agenda for future research, the paper ends by introducing the Irish Stone Axe Project—the major programme of database creation and petrological identification, funded by the National Heritage Council, currently being undertaken by GC and EG. 'AG 425. Stone axe, 87/i6" X 35/s", found by "Richard Glen- clear, the study of stone axes in Ireland has been far non and James Nolan of the Batchelor's Walk, Dublin, stuck from dormant.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Adzes Or Antler Wedges
    STONE ADZES OR ANTLER WEDGES ? AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PREHISTORIC TREE -FELLING IN THE NORTHWESTERN BOREAL REGION Jacques Cinq-Mars Department of Anthropology, 13-15 HM Tory Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3; [email protected] or [email protected] Raymond Le Blanc Department of Anthropology, University of Alberta; [email protected] ABSTRACT “Adze-cut stumps” is the name commonly used by both local residents and passing ethnographers and archaeologists to designate culturally modified tree stumps that are known to occur in many areas of the Northwestern boreal forest. As the name implies, they have been viewed as indicative of ancient logging or tree-felling activities, presumably carried out with stone adzes, and whose resulting particu- lar morphological attributes have long been interpreted as indicative of a relatively great antiquity, i.e., generally dating back to (or prior to) the period of European contact when traded steel axes quickly replaced the stone adzes. However, a close examination of available ethnographic data, personal field observations, and, particularly, the first results of an experimental tree-felling study indicate quite convincingly that such features should best be interpreted as having been created by an entirely dif- ferent technique making use of “antler wedges.” Furthermore, field observations from the Old Crow/ Porcupine area can be used to suggest that quite a number of these “stumps,” especially when found in clusters, may well be associated with the construction and maintenance of caribou fences, semisubter- ranean housepits, and various types of caches. Finally, recently obtained preliminary dendrochrono- logical results and radiocarbon dates indicate that these “stumps” are indeed precontact in age, and that some of them date back to at least the beginning of the second millennium ad.
    [Show full text]