Katherine Maher Lydia Pintscher Alessandro Barbero Jimmy Wales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Katherine Maher Lydia Pintscher Alessandro Barbero Jimmy Wales

La itWikiCon 2020 è il convegno della comunità dei progetti Wikimedia in lingua italiana e nelle lingue minori del territorio italiano e si svolgerà online il 24 e 25 ottobre in contemporanea e in collaborazione con il Linux Day. Ospiti speciali Katherine Maher Alessandro Barbero Direttrice esecutiva della Wikimedia Foundation Storico, accademico e scrittore Lydia Pintscher Jimmy Wales Product Manager di Wikidata Cofondatore del progetto Wikipedia Programma Wikimedia 2030: cosa cambierà e come partecipare Introduzione a Wikidata Sabato 24 dalle 11:00 alle 13:00 Caccia al tesoro sulla storia dell'informatica Tavola rotonda sui progetti fratelli Wikidata per WLM Certificare le conoscenze Wikimedia: un framework Come collaborare con i piccoli musei nei progetti Wikimedia? Openedu SPARQL: milleuno domande che non vi siete mai fatti ma di cui daremo risposta Vikidia, Wikiversità e Wikivoyage nella scuola primaria e secondaria di primo Introduzione a OpenStreetMap grado Mappare il passato: OHM Edutainment ai tempi del Covid - Wikipedia & OSM al servizio del mondo ludico Perché non posso fotografare la piazza del mio paese? Il Daty Pywikibot - Ovvero: come ho imparato a non preoccuparmi e ad amare il La data visualization sui progetti Wikimedia web semantico Voci semi-protette all'infinito Corso accelerato sui Template e moduli Lua Domenica 25 dalle 13:15 alle 14:15 Esplorando Busto Arsizio – tour virtuale interattivo La gestione dei conflitti nei progetti Wikimedia, modalità a confronto Accessibilità e usabilità dei progetti Wikimedia Qual è il nostro nome? Wikipedia, Wikimedia e il rebranding WikiBase, partendo da zero Wikisource - Gli strumenti per facilitarsi la vita itWikicon nei prossimi anni Wikinotizie non è triste come pensate Community Health Metrics: presentazione del progetto Iniziativa per la Sostenibilità – che c'è di nuovo? Wikiproxy: come Wikipedia può sopravvivere alle censure dei governi 24 e 25 ottobre, online 2020.itwikicon.org.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Culture of Wikipedia
Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented.
[Show full text]
COI Editing and Its Discontents
Wikipedia @ 20 Paid With Interest: COI Editing and its Discontents William Beutler Published on: Jun 10, 2019 Updated on: Jun 19, 2019 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Wikipedia @ 20 Paid With Interest: COI Editing and its Discontents Image credit: Jim Pennucci. 1. Everyone involved with Wikipedia has some kind of interest in what it says. In the classic formulation, its volunteer editors are inspired to empower a global audience by compiling information in an accessible format. Practically speaking, though, most participate because the project appeals to their personality, their sense of justice, or there's an ego boost in deciding what the world knows about their pet subject. Its readers care simply because they want to learn something. For the most part, this works very well. Things are rather different when the motivation is financial. Most contributors consider editing Wikipedia to promote a business a morally different endeavor, and its readers, too, may be alarmed to learn some edits are made not to benevolently share knowledge with the world, but because the writer has a material stake in how the topic is represented. And yet the structure of Wikipedia makes this tension inevitable. The site's vast influence owes something to the fact that anyone can influence it, so when those described in its virtual pages decide to do exactly that, the result is one of Wikipedia's most challenging existential dilemmas. Wikipedia's favored terminology for this is "conflict of interest", referred to in shorthand as "COI"— although other terms such as "paid editing" or "paid advocacy" are often encountered.
[Show full text]
What We Can Learn from Wikipedia: Why We Should Jump on Board
Collaborative Librarianship Volume 10 Issue 1 Article 2 6-15-2018 What we can learn from Wikipedia: Why we should jump on board Lori Bowen Ayre Galecia Group, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Ayre, Lori Bowen (2018) "What we can learn from Wikipedia: Why we should jump on board," Collaborative Librarianship: Vol. 10 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol10/iss1/2 This Columns is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collaborative Librarianship by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Ayre: What We Can Learn from Wikipedia Technology Matters What We Can Learn from Wikipedia: Why We Should Jump Onboard Lori Bowen Ayre ([email protected]) The Galecia Group In an effort to fight conspiracy theories from 4. Wikipedia’s editors should treat each propagating uncontested on YouTube, Susan other with respect and civility Wojcicki, YouTube CEO, announced that con- 5. Wikipedia has no firm rules spiracy videos would be accompanied by “infor- mation cues” to provide an alternate viewpoint. Wikipedia content is a product of the effort of The announcement came during a panel at “hundreds of thousands of people” who write, South by Southwest on March 20th, 2018. improve, and update articles in an effort to keep it “neutral and supported by reliable re- The authoritative resource that would be called sources.”3 It is overwhelmingly made up of vol- upon to both define conspiracy theories and unteer editors with a smaller cadre of volunteers provide the alternative viewpoint on those theo- who have some additional editorial authority.
[Show full text]
Wikimedia Movement Strategy Process
Wikimedia Movement Strategy Process Gereon Kalkuhl, Nicole Ebber Pre-Wikimania meeting Berlin, June 10, 2017 Stephan Kunz, CC Zero, Unsplash The most notable source of knowledge in the world Beko, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons 10 thousands of volunteers Martin Kraft, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons st Data is the oil of the 21 century Addshore, CC Zero, Wikimedia Commons Conserving the past: Wiki loves monuments Shreemilabaj, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons Shaping copyright Sebastiaan Ter-Burg, CC BY 2.0, Wikimedia Commons Changing society Together with GLAMs Romaine, CC Zero, Wikimedia Commons We’ve come a long way. But where do we go from here? What do we want to build or achieve together over the next 15 years? Niccolò Caranti, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons Wikimania 2016 in Esino Lario Katherine Maher new WMF ED Wikimedia Movement Strategy Niccolò Caranti, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons Timeline Before Wikimania Develop Wikimedia’s global strategic direction; “Which mountain do we want to climb?” After Wikimania How can we fill this direction with life? (roles, responsibilities, resources, goals); “How do we climb this mountain?” Andrew Neel, CC Zero, Unsplash Goals for this process As a movement, identify a cohesive direction that aligns and inspires us all on our path to 2030. Build trust within our movement through participation in an open process based on shared power. Better understand the people and institutions that form our movement, those we are not yet reaching, and how their needs may change over the next 13 years.
[Show full text]
The Future of Wikimedia and Why New Zealand Museums Should Pay Attention
The Future of Wikimedia and Why New Zealand Museums Should Pay Attention Susan Tolich On the 21st of May it was announced that Mike Dickison will be assuming the position as Aotearoa’s frst Wikipedia-at-large. Tis new role will entail several placements at GLAM institutions around the country where Dickison will act as a ‘Wikipedian in Residence.’ Tis position does not involve editing Wikipedia on behalf of the organisations but focuses on training staf in how to contribute and engage with all parts of Wikimedia and its editing community. Wikipedia is just one of the projects run by the non-proft Wikimedia Foundation; others include Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. Troughout his career Dickison has had years of experience advocating for Wikipedia to be used in the GLAM sector and has hosted various events to improve the representation of New Zealand endemic species and female scientists on the site.1 While Dickson is the frst Wikipedian-at-large in New Zealand he is part of a much larger global movement which works towards creating a freely accessed ‘sum of all knowledge.’ Wikimedians have partnered with GLAM institutions around the world since 2010 with the mission of ‘connecting audiences to open knowledge, ideas and creativity on a global scale.’2 Other Wikipedian-in-residence projects have ranged from creating documentary photography of Carpathian folk lore, to upskilling librarians in the Ivory Coast to be able to promote their heritage using Wikimedia platforms. It was eforts such as these that also delivered Te Metropolitan Museum 1 Mike Dickison, “New Zealand Wikimedian at large,” Giant Flightless Bird (Blog), 21 May 2018, http://www.giantfightlessbirds.com/2018/05/new-zealand-wikipedian-at-large/ 2 Katherine Maher and Loic Tallon, “Wikimedia and the Met: a shared digital vision,” Medium, 20 April 2018, https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/wikimedia-and -the-met-a-shared-digital-vision-f91b59eab2e9.
[Show full text]
Introduction
Introduction Maibritt Borgen, Nanna Bonde Thylstrup & Kristin Veel Introdution controversy, as the initiative was both lauded and lamented for its potential to disrupt the tradition- Wikipedia is one of the most visited knowledge re- al structures of the knowledge field and industry sources in the world. The Alexa traffic rankings put (Rosenzweig, 2006; Ford, this issue). The discus- it at number 7, well above the New York Times (104), sions revolved in particular around the authority of the BBC (106), the Library of Congress (1,175), experts versus lay people. Today this polarization and the venerable Encyclopedia Britannica (3711) has given way to closer cooperation between Wiki- (Alexa, 2016). As historian Roy Rosenzweig puts it, pedia and other traditional knowledge-producing Wikipedia has become "perhaps the largest work of communities such as libraries and museums.1 Yet, as online historical writing, the most widely read work the dust settles over the expert/layman disputes, new of digital history, and the most important free histori- contours of contestation have become apparent. One cal resource on the World Wide Web" (Rosenzweig is the political ideology and ideological potential of 2006, p. 52). Wikipedia has become so ingrained in Wikipedia (Firer-Blaess and Fuchs, 2014, p. 87-103; our everyday search for information that users rarely Chozik, 2013, June 27).2 Another is its politics of give thought to the mechanisms and agency under- transparency (Tkacz, 2015). A third is its bureaucrat- neath its production of knowledge: who produces its ic structures (Jemielniak, 2014). But the most per- content? And what visible and invisible structures sistent point of contestation remains its gender gap govern this production? Indeed, we have come to problem.
[Show full text]
Introduction: Connections
Wikipedia @ 20 • ::Wikipedia @ 20 Introduction: Connections Joseph Reagle, Jackie Koerner Published on: Oct 15, 2020 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Wikipedia @ 20 • ::Wikipedia @ 20 Introduction: Connections Twenty years ago, Wikipedia set out on its path to provide humanity with free access to the sum of all knowledge. Even if this is a mission that can’t be finished, Wikipedia has made remarkable progress toward the impossible. How so? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia built on a wiki. And never has an application (gathering the sum of human knowledge) been so suited to its medium (easily interconnected web pages). Encyclopedias have long been reliant on interconnections. In 1755, the Encyclopédie’s Denis Diderot wrote that the use of cross-references (or renvois) was “the most important part of our encyclopedia scheme.”1 This feature allowed the Encyclopédie’s editors to depict the connective tissue of Enlightenment knowledge and to dodge state and church authorities by way of facetious and satirical references. For example, they linked to articles on the Christian rite of communion, wherein “the body and blood of Christ” is consumed, from the article on “Cannibals.” At the onset of each new informational medium—from paper, to microfilm, to silicon—connectivity was the impetus. Among the documentalists of the early twentieth century, there was Wilhelm Ostwald’s Brücke, a bridge, and Suzanne Briet’s indice, an indicator. Such documentalists advanced indexing and classification schemes to improve interconnections between information. Then, on the cusp of the digital age, Vannevar Bush famously wrote of the power of an electromechanical memex laced with “associative trails.”2 This inspired the hyperlinks of the 1960s and the URLs of the 1990s.
[Show full text]
Contributors
Wikipedia @ 20 • ::Wikipedia @ 20 Contributors Published on: Oct 15, 2020 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Wikipedia @ 20 • ::Wikipedia @ 20 Contributors Phoebe Ayers is the librarian for electrical engineering and computer science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries. She has been a Wikipedian since 2003, is a former member of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees, and is the coauthor of How Wikipedia Works: And How You Can Be a Part of It (No Starch Press, 2008). Omer Benjakob is a journalist and researcher based in Israel. He was born in New York and raised in Tel Aviv. His work focuses on Wikipedia and the politics of knowledge in the digital age. He covers the online encyclopedia for Haaretz—Israel’s sole paper of record—in English and Hebrew. His work has also appeared in Wired UK. His academic research focuses on Wikipedia’s ties to science, and he works with scientists from the Weizmann Institute of Science and the Centre de recherches interdisciplinaires to map the growth of knowledge online. He’s pursuing an MA from Tel Aviv University’s Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas. Yochai Benkler is the Berkman Professor of Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard Law School and codirector of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. He has been a leading scholar on the impact of the internet on the networked economy and society since the 1990s, with a particular focus on commons, cooperation, and decentralization. His books include Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics (Oxford University Press, 2018) and The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, 2006).
[Show full text]
Free Knowledge for a Free World
Collaborative Peer Production In a Health Context Jimmy Wales President, Wikimedia Foundation Wikipedia Founder What I will talk about •What is Wikipedia? •How the community works •Core principles of the Wikimedia Foundation •What will be free? “The ideal encyclopedia should be radical. It should stop being safe.” --1962, Charles van Doren, later a senior editor at Britannica Wikipedia’s Radical Idea: Imagine a world in which every single person is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That’s what we’re doing. What is the Wikimedia Foundation? •Non-profit foundation •Aims to distribute a free encyclopedia to every single person on the planet in their own language •Wikipedia and its sister projects •Funded by public donations •Partnering with select institutions wikimediafoundation.org What is Wikipedia? •Wikipedia is: • a freely licensed encyclopedia written by thousands of volunteers in many languages wikipedia.org What do I mean by free? •Free as in speech, not free as in beer •4 Freedoms – Freedom to copy – Freedom to modify – Freedom to redistribute – Freedom to redistribute modified versions How big is Wikipedia? •English Wikipedia is largest and has over 500 million words •English Wikipedia larger than Britannica and Microsoft Encarta combined •German Wikipedia equal in size to Brockhaus How big is Wikipedia Globally? • 740,000 - English • 292,000 - German • >100,000 - French, Japanese, Italian, Polish, Swedish • >50,000 - Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish • 2.2 million across 200 languages •30 with >10,000. 75 with >1000 Some Wikimedia Projects •Wikipedia •Wiktionary •Wikibooks •Wikiquote •Wikimedia Commons •Wikinews How popular is Wikipedia? • Top 40 website • According to Alexa.com, broader reach than..
[Show full text]
IT Skills in Demand
Pavanaja U. B. Vishva Kannada [email protected] *Tulu belongs to Dravidian family of languages. *Geographically and politically it belongs to Karnataka and to northern Kerala. *There are about 30 lakh Tulu speakers including those who are staying outside Tulunadu. *Tulu has its own distinct identity. Images from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA) *No of speakers ~30 lakh *Tulu had its own script, but not in use recently *Kannada script is used by Tulu nowadays *Tulu has less Sanskrit words compared to Kannada *Use of Kannada script has brought in many Kannada and Sanskrit words to Tulu *No science writing in Tulu *There is no encyclopaedia in Tulu *Tulu has been introduced as a language at Mangaluru & Udupi district schools *Students have no encyclopaedic books, websites to read other than the text books *Bringing world knowledge in your language helps to preserve and grow the language *Most of Tulu culture, literature, heritage is still in oral tradition. It needs to be documented *Started as an incubator project in 2008 *Some activity in 2008-09, dormant afterwards *Meeting held in Jan 2014 to instil new life *Many meetings workshops, editathons held at Mangaluru & Udupi *Presentation done during World Tulu Festival at Mangaluru, Dec 2014 *All these brought in a new set of dedicated editors *Lot of media mentions brought in awareness In incubator January November August 2016 2014 2014 Articles 135 747 1079 Editors 8 68 102 (>10 edits) 19-01-2014, Mangaluru 05-04-2014, Mangaluru 19-04-2014, Mangaluru 25-05-2014, Udupi 26-28-11-2014, Sahyadri
[Show full text]
From Diderot's Encyclopedia to Wales's Wikipedia
Miloš Todorović Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade [email protected] FROM DIDEROT’S ENCYCLOPEDIA TO WALES’S WIKIPEDIA: A BRIEF HISTORY OF COLLECTING AND SHARING KNOWLEDGE Abstract: Collecting and sharing knowledge are activities which are almost as important as creating knowledge. Yet, the ideas of collecting and sharing knowledge have changed over time, reflecting society’s needs. That’s why it’s necessary to study the evolution of the idea of collecting and sharing knowledge from the first libraries of the Near East during the Bronze Age, used by priests and rulers, through the new concept developed by Pliny the Elder, who wrote the earliest encyclopedic work that has survived to the present in the 1st century AD, and the first encyclopedias, covering a wide range of topics written in the Enlightenment era, all the way to the digital encyclopedias published on CD-ROMs and online encyclopedias like Wikipe- dia. Keywords: Collecting knowledge, encyclopedia, Encyclopédie, Wikipedia From collecting texts to collecting knowledge The idea of collecting knowledge is almost as old as the idea of searching for knowledge. First texts written on papyrus and clay tablets that can be regarded as books appeared in the Near East during the Bronze Age. Collecting these works was of great importance and the first collections were started during the 3rd millennium BC in palaces and temples of Mesopotamia and Syria. In the 2nd millennium BC we can find collections of ‘books’ in Anatolia and Egypt. Epic poetry, religious texts, and royal de- crees and letters were collected alongside administrative documents of various kinds and these first collections were reserved for the use of the elite and priests only.1 1 G.
[Show full text]
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Wikis Imagine a world in which every Invented by Ward Cunningham in 1995, wikis are single person is given free access dynamic websites in which any user can edit a page, to the sum of all human know- quickly and easily, using a web browser. The name ledge. That‘s what we‘re doing. is derived from the Hawaiian word “Wikiwiki”, -- Jimmy Wales meaning fast. Wikis use a simple formatting lan- Wikimedia is an international non-profit organisa- guage anyone can learn in just a few minutes. For tion dedicated to the development and distribu- example, to italicise text, surround it with two tion of free multilingual content. It hosts various apostrophes; use three for bolded text, and en- free-content projects, most notably Wikipedia, the close a word in two brackets ([[]]) to create a link award-winning online encyclopædia. Other online to another page in the wiki. projects include Wiktionary, a multilingual diction- ary; Wikibooks, a collection of free-content text- books; Wikiquote, a repository of famous quotes; and Wikisource, a repository for primary-source materials. The Wikimedia Foundation was set up in June 2003 to serve and develop the necessary infrastructure for the constantly growing projects. It owns the Wikimedia servers and covers bandwidth and hosting costs. In Germany, France and Italy, local Wikimedia chapters have been founded to support and promote the projects on a national level. Wiki- media is run mostly by volunteer staff and relies entirely on public donations and grants to meet its goal of providing free knowledge to every person in the world.
[Show full text]