History of Insurgency in Manipur

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Insurgency in Manipur The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis ISSN NO: 0886-9367 History of Insurgency in Manipur M.AROCKIA SELVA SUNDARI, Reg.No:18112231082005 Ph.D Research Scholar, P.G&Research Department History, V.O.Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi.628008 MAIL ID [email protected] (Affiliated to ManonmaniamSundaranarUniversity, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India) Dr.K.SASIKALA. M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D, Assistant Professor, P.G&ResearchDeparttmentOf History, V.O.Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi.628008 (Affiliated to ManonmaniamSundaranarUniversity, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.) Introduction Manipur, one of the important states of India in the North-Eastern region has been afflicted by insurgency since the Independence of India. Manipur acceded to Indian Union on 15 October, 1949. Certain sections of the people who were loyal to the erstwhile King called this as forced accession and started insurgent activities against the established government. The State also has sizeable population of Nagas in two districts of the State. They follow the pattern of insurgency prevalent in the State of Nagaland. Similarly other ethnic groups such as Kukis, Paitesetc have their own insurgent outfits which promote the narrow political agenda of the extremists of such ethnic groups. Historical background of insurgency in Manipur The Kingdom of Manipur was conquered by the British following the brief Anglo- ManipurWar of 1891, becoming a British protectorate.1 The Kingdom of Manipur was merged with the Indian Union on 15 October 1949. After a protracted agitation it was declared a separate state in 1972. The alleged „forced‟ merger of Manipur and the delay in the conferring of full-fledged statehood to it was greatly resented by the people of Manipur.2 The first insurgent outfit to emerge in the State is the United National Liberation Front (UNLF), which was formed on 24 November 1964. Since then several other outfits, like the People's Liberation Army (PLA), founded on September 25, 1978, People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK) set up on October 9, 1977 and the Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP) that came into being in April, 1980 have emerged in the Manipur valley areas consisting of four districts (Imphal West, Imphal East, Thoubal and Bishnupur) of the State. All these insurgent groups have been demanding a separate. Volume XI, Issue XII, December/2019 Page No:2887 The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis ISSN NO: 0886-9367 Key words: Manipur,erstwhile King, insurgent,People's Liberation, independent Manipur. Spill-over insurgency of Nagas in the State Earlier, the number of districts was only nine—four in the valley namely, Imphal West, Imphal East, Thoubal and Bishnupur and five districts in the hills namely, Senapati, Ukhrul, Churachandpur, Chandel, and Tamenglong. However in December 2016, the Government created 7 more districts by bifurcating Tamenglong, Ukhrul, SenapatiChurachandpur, Chandel, Thoubal and Imphal East districts. Tamenglong, district has been bifurcated into Noney and Tamenglong districts, Churachandpur into Pherzawl and Churachandpur, Chandel into Tengnoupal and Chandel districts, Ukhrul into Kamjong and Ukhrul districts, Senapati into Kangpokpi and Senapati districts, Thoubal district into Thoubal and Kakching districts and Imphal-East into Imphal- East and Jiribam. Kangpokpi district is also the other name of Sadar Hills district. The creation of these districts came in the wake of the ongoing indefinite economic blockade enforced by the United Naga Council (UNC), protesting against the creation of two districts, Sadar and Jiribam, alleging that the new districts would encroach the ancestral land of the Nagas. The hill areas of the State have been affected by different types of militancy. From Nagaland, violence by the Naga groups has spilt over into Manipur, a substantial part of which is claimed by the Isak-Muivah faction of National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN-IM) as part of Nagalim, the proposed unified territory of the Nagas as claimed by the Naga rebels. Several clashes between the NSCN-IM and the Khaplang faction of National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN-K) have been reported from the hill districts of the State. Insurgency by Kuki groups Kukitribals in the early 1990s initiated their insurgency against the alleged oppression by the NSCN-IM. Following ethnic clashes between the Nagas and Kukis in the early 1990s, a number of Kuki outfits were formed. Several other tribes, such as the Paite, Vaiphei and Hmars have also established their own armed groups. Similarly, Islamist outfits like the People‟s United Liberation Front (PULF) have also been formed to protect the interests of the „Pangals‟ (Manipuri Muslims). Present Scenario of insurgency in Manipur At present, there are more than 30 militant groups in Manipur (12 are active), including 10 KCP factions and 19 Kuki outfits operating in the state. Naga militant outfits such as NSCN-IM and NSCN-K are also operating in parts of the State's hill districts. The Kuki outfits are now in a mode of Suspension of Operations (SoO) with Volume XI, Issue XII, December/2019 Page No:2888 The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis ISSN NO: 0886-9367 the Government. A report of the State Home department in May 2005 indicated that „as many as 12,650 cadres of different insurgent outfits with 8830 weapons were actively operating in the State‟. According to government sources, the strength of those concentrated in the valley districts, is assessed at around 1500 cadres for the Revolutionary People‟s Front (RPF) and its armed wing, the PLA, 2500 cadres for the UNLF and its armed wing Manipur People‟s Army (MPA), 500 cadres for the PREPAK and its armed wing Red Army, while KangleiYawolKannaLup (KYKL) and its armed wing YawolLanmi is assessed as having a strength of 600 cadres. The Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP)‟s strength is assessed at 100 cadres. In Manipur, the valley-based outfits have remained active and the security force operations have made little difference to their capabilities. The UNLF, PLA, KYKL, PREPAK and the KCP have been involved in some of the serious attacks on security forces. The insurgents have an avowed policy of not targeting the state police personnel, unless circumstances demand it. The practice of directing their attack on the Army and the central para-military personnel is an attempt to create a divide between Manipur and India and to secure vital popular support. Armed with an extremely efficient intelligence network and superior fire power, the militants have been able to carve out a number of liberated zones across the State. By the end of 2007, however, the security forces had managed to dislodge the militants from most of such zones except for one in the New Somtal area in Chandel district. The reign of terror has manifested in other forms as well, since the rule of the insurgents has combined with a complete retreat of civil governance. The insurgents continue to terrorize and extort with impunity, and people have little option but to obey their diktats. There are incidents in which militants of the State have targeted VIPs. One such attack was planned on the then Chief Minister OkramIbobi Singh on November 23, 2007. Incidents of firing and grenade explosions targeting the residences of Ministers and Members of the State Legislative Assembly are still continuing. Due to the problem of militancy, the investments meant for infrastructural development have been divested in countering the growing unemployment in the State. There has been increase in educated unemployed youths in the State and they are now becoming ready recruits for the militant outfits. The cases of extortion are also increasing. Militants have resorted to extorting from almost all places including places of worship, educational institutes, health centres and commercial establishments. This has led to closure of quite a few establishments in the State. Adding to the woes of the State, the Naga insurgents, operating from Nagaland and the hills districts of Manipur, have been dominating the two National Highways, NH- 39 and NH-53, imposing taxes on the use of the roads and subsequent punishment on not paying it. There are 26 permanent and systematic „tax‟ collection points along these roads thus hampering Manipur‟s link with Assam and the rest of India.. Volume XI, Issue XII, December/2019 Page No:2889 The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis ISSN NO: 0886-9367 Another serious problem created by the militants is the kidnapping of children to train them to become members of insurgent outfits. There are also incidents of killing of non-Manipuri by the militants. The media in the State has also suffered and there had been quite a few incidents in which media persons have been killed by unidentified miscreants. State’s intervention Manipur had been declared a „disturbed area‟ in its entirety in 1980 and the Armed Forces Special Power Act (AFSPA) 1958 was imposed in the State on 8 September, 1980, which continues to be in place till now. The implementation of this Act resulted in the State witnessing an unprecedented civic uprising, including the infamous “mothers‟ nude protest” against the Act in July 2004 on the discovery of the mutilated body of ThangjamManorama, after she was picked up by the Assam Rifles and later found dead. The AFSPA is still embroiled in controversy and the people of Manipur are continuing their protest against the Act. RajkumarMeghen
Recommended publications
  • Survey of Conflicts & Resolution in India's Northeast
    Survey of Conflicts & Resolution in India’s Northeast? Ajai Sahni? India’s Northeast is the location of the earliest and longest lasting insurgency in the country, in Nagaland, where separatist violence commenced in 1952, as well as of a multiplicity of more recent conflicts that have proliferated, especially since the late 1970s. Every State in the region is currently affected by insurgent and terrorist violence,1 and four of these – Assam, Manipur, Nagaland and Tripura – witness scales of conflict that can be categorised as low intensity wars, defined as conflicts in which fatalities are over 100 but less than 1000 per annum. While there ? This Survey is based on research carried out under the Institute’s project on “Planning for Development and Security in India’s Northeast”, supported by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). It draws on a variety of sources, including Institute for Conflict Management – South Asia Terrorism Portal data and analysis, and specific State Reports from Wasbir Hussain (Assam); Pradeep Phanjoubam (Manipur) and Sekhar Datta (Tripura). ? Dr. Ajai Sahni is Executive Director, Institute for Conflict Management (ICM) and Executive Editor, Faultlines: Writings on Conflict and Resolution. 1 Within the context of conflicts in the Northeast, it is not useful to narrowly define ‘insurgency’ or ‘terrorism’, as anti-state groups in the region mix in a wide range of patterns of violence that target both the state’s agencies as well as civilians. Such violence, moreover, meshes indistinguishably with a wide range of purely criminal actions, including drug-running and abduction on an organised scale. Both the terms – terrorism and insurgency – are, consequently, used in this paper, as neither is sufficient or accurate on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • TERRORISM a VIF Analysis
    TWELVE ESSAYS ON TERRORISM A VIF Analysis TWELVE ESSAYS ON TERRORISM A VIF Analysis Edited by Lt Gen Gautam Banerjee Foreword by Gen NC Vij, PVSM, UYSM, AVSM Director, Vivekananda International Foundation, New Delhi Vivekananda International Foundation New Delhi PENTAGON PRESS Twelve Essays on Terrorism Editor: Lt Gen Gautam Banerjee Vivekananda International Foundation, New Delhi ISBN 978-81-8274-942-9 First Published in 2017 Copyright © RESERVED All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the book are the individual assertion of the Authors. The Publisher does not take any responsibility for the same in any manner whatsoever. The same shall solely be the responsibility of the Authors. Published by PENTAGON PRESS 206, Peacock Lane, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049 Phones: 011-64706243, 26491568 Telefax: 011-26490600 email: [email protected] website: www.pentagonpress.in Printed at Avantika Printers Private Limited. CONTENTS Foreword vii Preamble ix List of Contributors xi 1. Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and its South Asian Connection: An Indian Perspective 1 Alvite Singh Ningthoujam 2. International Terrorism Post 9/11: Emerging Trends and Global Response 18 Rohit Singh 3. Maoist Insurgency: Escalation and Dimensions of the State’s Armed Response 56 Lt Gen Gautam Banerjee 4. Terror Financing and the Global CTF Regime 86 Abhinav Pandya and C.D. Sahay 5. Taxation and Extortion: A Major Source of Militant Economy in North-East India 120 Brigadier Sushil Kumar Sharma 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Militancy and Negotiations: a Study of Suspension of Operation in Manipur
    Militancy and Negotiations: A Study of Suspension of Operation in Manipur Ch. Sekholal Kom* To resolve conflict and avoid the use of force, it is said, one must negotiate - Fred C. Iklé Abstract One of the most striking features of militancy in Northeast India in general and Manipur in particular is how infrequently the two sides (Government and the militants) attempt peaceful negotiation. Very often, the government refuses to grant the militants legitimacy as a bargaining partner. On the other, militants in the region are averse to go into negotiation with the government whom they confront. However, in spite of this phenomenon, confrontations do reach a point at a certain stage where both sides agree to negotiate rather than confront each other. Remarkably, the present tripartite truce popularly known as Suspension of Operation (SoO) between the Government of India and the state government of Manipur on one side and the Kuki militants on the other turns out to be a significant development. The paper discusses how this negotiation can be attributed as a technique of alternative dispute resolution in a multi-ethnic situation particularly in a conflict-ridden state like Manipur. Right since the dawn various militant ethnic groups. of independence of the Although Naga militancy was the country, Northeast first to make its headway in the India has been witnessing a region, movements by other series of challenges such as ethnicities followed it. Notably, the unceasing demands for autonomy militant activities of the Nagas, the and even outright secessions by Kukis, the Bodos, and the Assamese *Ch. Sekholal Korn is a Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Four Contemporary Conflicts and Challenges to Peace in South
    Chapter Four Contemporary Conflicts and Challenges to Peace in South Asia Introduction South Asia has been one of the least peaceful regions in the world. Four full-scale interstate wars and a number of other low-intensity armed conflicts, ethnic conflicts, secessionist movements, and terrorism have mounted stiff challenges to peace in the region. Instability in the region is further perpetuated by the troubled relations between India and Pakistan, internal conflicts in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and militancy and movement for secession in Kashmir. India-Pakistan rivalry and Kashmir conflict has the potential to destabilise the entire South Asian landscape. Such a widespread threat to peace hardly emerges from the Sri Lanka Civil War, ethnic conflict in Bangladesh, secessionist movements in India‟s Northeast, left-wing extremism in India, and internal conflicts in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That is the reason why peaceful relations between India and Pakistan, and peace in Kashmir are crucial for regional peace and stability. This chapter briefly discusses the major internal and interstate conflicts in South Asia and makes an analysis of the potential sources of threats to peace, and how those threats can be mitigated through early preventive efforts. The focal point of the analysis is the status of all conflicts in the region in order to decipher the potential sources of threats to regional peace. For the purpose of brevity, the analysis does not intend going deeper into historical evolution of South Asian conflicts but dwells on a very concise introduction to present a brief idea of what possible threats could emerge in near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Protect Education from Attack GCPEA
    Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack GCPEA EDUCATION UNDER ATTACK Global Coalition to Protect GCPEA Education from Attack This study is published by the Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (GCPEA), an inter-agency coalition formed in 2010 by organizations working in the fields of education in emergencies and conflict-affected contexts, higher education, protection, international human rights and humanitarian law who were concerned about ongoing attacks on educational institutions, their students and staff in countries affected by conflict and insecurity. GCPEA is a coalition of organizations that includes: the Council for Assisting Refugee Academics (CARA), Human Rights Watch, the Institute of International Education, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Protect Education in Insecurity and Conflict (PEIC, a programme of Education Above All), Save the Children, the Scholars at Risk Network, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). GCPEA is a project of the Tides Center, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. This study is the result of independent external research commissioned by GCPEA. It is independent of the individual member organizations of the Steering Committee of GCPEA and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Steering Committee member organizations. CONTRIBUTORS Project team leader/Chief editor: Mark Richmond GCPEA would like to thank Julia Freedson, Vernor Muñoz and Lead researcher:
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Sixty-Ninth Session Sixty-Ninth Year Agenda Item Xx Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Children
    United Nations A/69/926–S/2015/409 General Assembly Distr.: General Security Council Xx 2015 Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-ninth session Sixty-ninth year Agenda item xx Promotion and protection of the rights of children Children and armed conflict Report of the Secretary-General I. Introduction 1. The present report, which covers the period from January to December 2014, is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 2068 (2012), by which the Council requested me to continue to submit annual reports on the implementation of its resolutions and presidential statements on children and armed conflict. 2. The report highlights recent global trends regarding the impact of armed conflict on children and provides information on grave violations against children in 2014. The main activities and initiatives with regard to the implementation of relevant Security Council resolutions and the conclusions of its Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict are outlined. In line with the resolutions of the Security Council pertaining to children and armed conflict, the report includes in its annexes a list of parties that engage in the recruitment and use of children, sexual violence against children, killing and maiming of children, attacks on schools and/or hospitals and attacks or threats of attacks against protected personnel, in contravention of international law. 3. All information presented in this report and its annexes has been documented, vetted, and verified for accuracy by the United Nations. In situations where the ability to obtain or independently verify information is hampered by factors such as insecurity or access restrictions, it is qualified as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Child Soldiers Manipur Case
    CONFLICT AND CHILD SOLDIERS MANIPUR CASE By PRIYADARSHINI LAISHRAM Study Undertaken under the supervision of PROFESSOR AMAR YUMNAM Manipur University REPORT OF A RESEARCH PROJECT FUNDED BY THE SARDAR VALLABHAI PATEL NATIONAL POLICE ACADEMY HYDERABAD 2017 Contents Preface Acknowledgements List of Abbreviations List of Tables Chapters Particulars Page Chapter – 1 Child Soldiers and Conflict 1-33 Chapter – 2 Conflict Situation in Manipur 34-51 Chapter – 3 Magnitude and Extent of Child Soldiering in Manipur 52-64 Chapter – 4 Milieu of Child Soldiering in Manipur 65-71 Chapter – 5 Conflict and the General Psyche of the People of Manipur 72-82 Chapter – 6 Conclusions and Recommendations 83-95 Bibliography 96-102 Appendix 103-109 PREFACE Manipur, a small state in the north eastern most frontier of India, nestled in the eastern flanks of the Himalayas abounds in natural beauty and biodiversity. A mini India with rich cultural diversity and heritage of more than 34 different ethnic groups and with a history of more than 2000 years old, it was once a princely state till it merged with the Union of India on 21st September, 1949 (effective from October 15, 1949) and eventually got the statehood status in 1972. Nearly 2 decades after its merger with the Union of India, Manipur started getting embroiled in conflict with a number of insurgent groups. Insurgency started from the 1960s with valley based groups like UNLF, PLA, PREPAK, KCP, KYKL etc the agenda and demands basically to secede from the Indian Union and restore the pre-merger status. Over the years several other groups especially hill based Naga groups, Kuki groups and valley based Muslim groups each with their set of demands and agenda started raising war against the government pegging the total figure of Insurgent groups operating in this small state from the 1960s to the early 2010s to an astounding more than 60 which in itself is quite a phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the World's Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2016 (MRG)
    State of the World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2016 Events of 2015 Focus on culture and heritage State of theWorld’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 20161 Events of 2015 Front cover: Cholitas, indigenous Bolivian Focus on culture and heritage women, dancing on the streets of La Paz as part of a fiesta celebrating Mother’s Day. REUTERS/ David Mercado. Inside front cover: Street theatre performance in the Dominican Republic. From 2013 to 2016 MRG ran a street theatre programme to challenge discrimination against Dominicans of Haitian Descent in the Acknowledgements Dominican Republic. MUDHA. Minority Rights Group International (MRG) Inside back cover: Maasai community members in gratefully acknowledges the support of all Kenya. MRG. organizations and individuals who gave financial and other assistance to this publication, including the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. © Minority Rights Group International, July 2016. All rights reserved. Material from this publication may be reproduced for teaching or other non-commercial purposes. No part of it may be reproduced in any form for Support our work commercial purposes without the prior express Donate at www.minorityrights.org/donate permission of the copyright holders. MRG relies on the generous support of institutions and individuals to help us secure the rights of For further information please contact MRG. A CIP minorities and indigenous peoples around the catalogue record of this publication is available from world. All donations received contribute directly to the British Library. our projects with minorities and indigenous peoples. ISBN 978-1-907919-80-0 Subscribe to our publications at State of www.minorityrights.org/publications Published: July 2016 Another valuable way to support us is to subscribe Lead reviewer: Carl Soderbergh to our publications, which offer a compelling Production: Jasmin Qureshi analysis of minority and indigenous issues and theWorld’s Copy editing: Sophie Richmond original research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolt of 1857
    1A THE REVOLT OF 1857 1. Objectives: After going through this unit the student wilt be able:- a) To understand the background of the Revolt 1857. b) To explain the risings of Hill Tribes. c) To understand the causes of The Revolt of 1857. d) To understand the out Break and spread of the Revolt of 1857. e) To explain the causes of the failure of the Revolt of 1857. 2. Introduction: The East India Company's rule from 1757 to 1857 had generated a lot of discontent among the different sections of the Indian people against the British. The end of the Mughal rule gave a psychological blow to the Muslims many of whom had enjoyed position and patronage under the Mughal and other provincial Muslim rulers. The commercial policy of the company brought ruin to the artisans and craftsman, while the divergent land revenue policy adopted by the Company in different regions, especially the permanent settlement in the North and the Ryotwari settlement in the south put the peasants on the road of impoverishment and misery. 3. Background: The Revolt of 1857 was a major upheaval against the British Rule in which the disgruntled princes, to disconnected sepoys and disillusioned elements participated. However, it is important to note that right from the inception of the East India Company there had been resistance from divergent section in different parts of the sub continent. This resistance offered by different tribal groups, peasant and religious factions remained localized and ill organized. In certain cases the British could putdown these uprisings easily, in other cases the struggle was prolonged resulting in heavy causalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Future Conflict: Too Little, Too Late?
    Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Future Conflict: Too Little, Too Late?∗ Lars-Erik Cederman y ETH Z¨urich Simon Hugz D´epartement de science politique et relations internationales, Universit´ede Gen`eve Andreas Sch¨adelx ETH Z¨urich and Julian Wucherpfennig{ ETH Z¨urich Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (Chicago, August 29{September 1, 2013) August 22, 2013 1 Abstract A number of scholars have argued that territorial autonomy ar- rangements prevent and reduce secessionist conflict. By offering con- cessions to ethnonationalist rebels, governments can potentially help bring about political stability. Other experts warn against such mea- sures since they could deepen ethnic divisions and empower the seces- sionists by strengthening their institutional capacity, thus increasing the likelihood of future conflict. Despite the amount of research con- ducted in this area, the debate between the two positions remains unresolved. This study tries to bring more clarity to the debate by setting up a clear baseline for comparison and by considering the ef- fect of prior conflict. Basing our analysis on ethnic groups around the world since WWII, we investigate the influence of both governmental and territorial power sharing before and after the outbreak of the first conflict. Our evidence indicates that both types of governance have a strongly conflict-preventing effect in situations where there is no prior conflict history. In post-conflict settings, however, only inclusion in power sharing arrangements at the central level reduces the probabil- ity of conflict recurrence. By contrast, post-conflict use of regional autonomy is most likely too little, too late.
    [Show full text]
  • Tens of Thousands Newly Displaced in North- Eastern and Central States
    INDIA: Tens of thousands newly displaced in north- eastern and central states A profile of the internal displacement situation 9 February, 2006 This Internal Displacement Profile is automatically generated from the online IDP database of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). It includes an overview of the internal displacement situation in the country prepared by the IDMC, followed by a compilation of excerpts from relevant reports by a variety of different sources. All headlines as well as the bullet point summaries at the beginning of each chapter were added by the IDMC to facilitate navigation through the Profile. Where dates in brackets are added to headlines, they indicate the publication date of the most recent source used in the respective chapter. The views expressed in the reports compiled in this Profile are not necessarily shared by the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. The Profile is also available online at www.internal-displacement.org. About the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, established in 1998 by the Norwegian Refugee Council, is the leading international body monitoring conflict-induced internal displacement worldwide. Through its work, the Centre contributes to improving national and international capacities to protect and assist the millions of people around the globe who have been displaced within their own country as a result of conflicts or human rights violations. At the request of the United Nations, the Geneva-based Centre runs an online database providing comprehensive information and analysis on internal displacement in some 50 countries. Based on its monitoring and data collection activities, the Centre advocates for durable solutions to the plight of the internally displaced in line with international standards.
    [Show full text]
  • India Pakistan Arms Race and Militarisation Watch No
    India Pakistan Arms Race and Militarisation Watch Compilation (February 28, 2007) Year Seven, No 168 URL: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IPARMW/message/179 produced by South Asia Citizens Web and South Asians Against Nukes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Eminent Jurists Begin Probe into Counter-Terrorism Laws in South Asia 2 India: So-called Anti-Terrorist Laws are Tools of State Terrorism (Rohit Prajapati) 3 Pakistan: Militarisation of politics 4 War in Afghanistan and Pakistan 5 Pakistan: Sources of illegal weapons are all too well known to need investigation 6 India: Guns for pleasure, anyone? 7 Pakistan: New policy on military lands 8 Pakistan and India’s mad fantasy of keeping nuclear weapons free from risk: - Nuclear accord designed to promote ‘stable’ environment 9 India and Pakistan’s tit for tat missile race: - Pakistan military tests missile - Hatf VI missile test - Pakistan test fires long-range ballistic missile - India tests Brahmos Missile in February 2007 - India Plans 2nd ABM Test in June [2007] 10 India – Pakistan - Defence Spending: - Big rise in Indian defence budget - India hikes defence budget to Rs 96000 cr - Hike in unproductive expenditure 11 The "disappeared" in Pakistan and India: - Pakistani "disappeared" a growing problem: group - Democracy disappears with persons who ‘disappear’ - Kashmir Solidarity Committee and APDP Hold protest Rally in Delhi
    [Show full text]