DOCSLIB.ORG

Richard II (1367) Henrietta Stuart (1668) Edmund (Crouchback

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Richard II (1367) Henrietta Stuart (1668) Edmund (Crouchback © ! Robert Stuart (1601) Stuart Robert # ¨ # " § Edmund (Crouchback) Edmund (Crouchback) (1245) § ¦ ¥ ¤ ¡ £ " ¢ ! PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 ¡ ! Henry VII Tudor (1457) VII Tudor Henry (1491) Tudor VIII Henry # Richard Richard II (1367) (1668) Stuart Henrietta (1706) Louis Frederick Forz (1259) Aveline De © " 2 1 0 : . = 1 - ? B E ? > > 2 0 1 < : ; E A > D ? ? > 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 , G D @ + C ? ? > + Anne Stuart (1664) Stuart Anne * 2 ) 0 1 7 6 / ( & 0 6 ' 8 C F ? B ? PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 > > %& Henry Frederick (1593) Frederick Henry A.Of C. Andrew (1960) Windsor $ 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 B E > A ? > > Elizabeth Elizabeth (1465) (1516) Mary Tudor I 2 1 0 / 4 3 A G D ? @ > > 2 0 1 / . - C @ F ? ? > Catherine Stuart (1670) Stuart Catherine 2 1 0 : . = 1 - F ? B E ? ? > > Wilhelmina C. Caroline C. Wilhelmina Caroline (1682) 2 0 1 < : ; E A > D ? ? > 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 G D @ C , ? ? > + + 2 * 0 1 7 I 6 / 0 H 6 8 ( & C F ? B ? PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 > > Henry II Curtmantle II Curtmantle Henry (1133) (1637) Hyde Anne 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 B E > A ? > > Mary Tudor (1496) Mary Tudor Beaufort (1404) John Blanche (1345) 2 > @ 1 0 / 4 3 A G D ? @ > > Edward A.Of R. Edward (1964) Windsor (1636) Stuart Anne G 2 @ 0 1 / . - C @ F ? ? > Margaret (1429) Margaret 2 1 0 : . = 1 - C F ? B ? > > 2 0 1 < : ; B E > A ? > > Paul E. Hedges (1960) Paul Hedges E. II (1284) Edward 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 A G D ? @ > > , Henry IVHenry (1367) James V (1512) + + 2 * 0 1 7 K 6 / 0 J 6 8 & G C @ F ? ? @ PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 > George of Denmark of George Denmark (1653) (1662) Mary II Stuart 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 F ? B E ? ? > > Mary Stuart (1605) Mary Stuart 2 1 0 / 4 3 E A > D ? ? > Elizabeth Elizabeth II (1926) IV (1442) Edward 2 0 1 / . - G D @ C ? ? > 2 1 0 : . = 1 - A G D > ? @ @ > > Cicely Nevill (1415) Cicely Nevill Victoria Alexandrina (1819) 2 0 1 < : ; G C @ F ? ? @ > - 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 F ? B E ? ? > > , Sarah F. E. Armstrong F. E. Sarah (1964) Jones (1630) II Charles Stuart + + 2 0 1 * 7 6 / ) 0 6 ( 8 E A > D ? ? PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 > Philip (Felipe) II (1527) (Felipe) Philip (1660) IGeorge (Louis) 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 G D @ C ? ? > Charles J. (1629) Stuart Charles 2 1 0 / 4 3 C F ? B ? > > Sophia Charlotte (1744) Charlotte Sophia 2 0 1 / . - B E > A ? > > Anne (1366) Anne 2 1 0 : . = 1 - E A > D ? ? > 2 0 1 < : ; G D @ C ? ? > 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 C F ? B ? > > , Edmund of Langley Langley Edmund of (1341) (1566) Stuart James I + + 2 0 1 * 7 6 / $ 0 M 6 8 ' B E > A ? PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 > > L George (William) III III (William) George (1738) (Frederick) (1456) Neville Anne 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 A G D ? @ > > George (Frederick E. V E. (Frederick George (Albert) (1865) Mountbatten Philip (1921) I Longshanks Edward (1239) 2 1 0 / 4 3 G C @ F ? ? @ > Henrietta A. Stuart Stuart A. Henrietta (1644) VIII (1894) Edward 2 0 1 / . - F ? B E ? ? > > Geoffrey VI Martel Martel VI Geoffrey (1134) Woodstock of Edward (1330) (1606) Stuart Sophia (1639) Stuart Catherine 2 1 0 : . = 1 - C F ? B ? > > James Stuart (1663) James Stuart 2 0 1 < : ; B E > A ? > > Charles Stuart (1666) Charles 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 A G D > ? @ @ > > , + 2 + 0 1 * 7 6 / 0 ) 6 K 8 ' G C @ F ? ? @ PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 L > Frances Brandon Brandon Frances (1517) 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 F ? B E ? ? > > Henry Stuart (1640) Stuart Henry 2 1 0 / 4 3 E A > D ? ? > 2 0 1 / . - G D @ C ? ? > 2 1 0 : . = 1 - G C @ F ? ? @ > Friedrich V (1596) Friedrich 2 0 1 < : ; F ? B E ? ? > > Anne E. A. Of Windsor Windsor Of E. Anne A. (1950) 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 E A > , D ? ? > + William IV (Henry) IV William (Henry) (1765) (1930) Margaret + * 2 0 1 P 7 6 O / 0 ' 6 8 N G D @ ' C ? ? PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 > 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 C F ? B ? > > Edmund of Woodstock Edmund of (1301) IV (Augustus) George (1762) (Frederick) (1596) Elizabeth Stuart C. A. Francis A. Emmanuel (1819) - 2 1 0 / 4 3 B E > A ? > > Elizabeth A. M. Bowes M. Elizabeth A. (1900) Lyon > 2 @ 0 1 / . - A G D ? @ > > Victoria M. Louisa Louisa M. Victoria (1786) Plantagenet V Geoffrey (1113) 2 1 0 : . = 1 - G D @ C ? ? > Richard Plantagenet Richard Plantagenet (1411) 2 0 1 < : ; C F ? B ? > > Sophia Dorothea (1666) Dorothea Sophia 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 , + B E > A ? > > + Mary B. Eleanora Mary Eleanora B. (1658) * 2 0 1 & $ 7 % 6 / 0 R 6 8 A $ G D ? @ PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 P > > $ Q 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 G C @ F ? ? @ > Henry V Henry (1387) 2 1 0 / 4 3 F ? B E ? ? > > Roger Mortimer (1373) Roger Lion C. Richard I D. (1157) (1516) of Cleves Anne Woodstock of Joan (1328) 2 0 1 / . - E A > D ? ? > Elizabeth I Tudor (1533) Tudor Elizabeth I (1667) Stuart Edgar 2 1 0 : . = 1 - B E > A ? > > 2 0 1 < : ; A G D > ? @ @ > > 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 G C @ , F ? ? @ > + Richard III (1452) Richard III II (Augustus) George (1683) + * 2 0 1 7 6 & $ / 0 % 6 8 T F ? B P E ? ? PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 > > H Henry III Henry (1207) Stuart (1660) Charles S 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 E A > D ? ? > Margaret Douglas Douglas Margaret (1515) of Denmark Anna (1574) (1630) Sophia (1633) James II Stuart 2 1 0 / 4 3 G D @ C ? ? > Edward (1453) Edward (1401) Catherine 2 0 1 / . - C F ? B ? > > Edward VI (1537) Tudor Edward 2 1 0 : . = 1 - F ? B E ? ? > > Margaret Tudor (1489) Tudor Margaret 2 0 1 < : ; E A > D ? ? > Charles Of Windsor Windsor Of Charles (1948) 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 , + G D @ C ? ? > + Edward III (1312) Edward (1629) August Ernst * 2 0 1 & $ 7 % 6 / 0 R 6 8 $ C F ? B ? PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 U > > Charles I(1600) Stuart Charles T 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 B E > A ? > > Edward V (1470) Edward Princess Mary Stuart, Royal (1631) III (1650) William (1609) Maria Henrietta Henrietta Catherine (1638) - 2 1 0 / 4 3 A G D ? @ > > David A. C. Armstrong David C. A. (1961) Jones G 2 @ 0 1 Augusta (1719) Augusta / . - C @ F ? ? > Edward, Duke of Duke Kent Edward, (1767) Isabelle (1389) VII (Albert) Edward (1841) 2 1 0 : . = 1 - G D @ C ? ? > Henry VIHenry (1421) Mortimer (1390) Anne 2 0 1 < : ; C F ? B ? > > 2 0 1 7 : . 9 5 , B + E > A ? > > + Mary, Queen of Scots Scots of Queen Mary, (1542) * 2 0 1 & $ 7 6 % / 0 R 6 8 A G D $ > ? @ @ PrintedbyGenbox 3.0 > > H John Lackland (1167) Lackland John (1598) Stuart Margaret $ V 2 0 1 7 6 . 5 G C @ F ? ? @ > Catherine of Aragon Aragon of Catherine (1485) 2 1 0 / 4 3 F ? B E ? ? > > Alexandra C. M. C. C. M. C. Alexandra Julia (1844) Louisa, (1635) Elizabeth Stuart 2 0 1 / . - E A > D ? ? > Henry Stuart, Lord Lord Stuart, Henry Darnley (1545) F. VI (Albert George (1895) (George) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I Queen Anne's Upbringing, Education, and Their Impact
    QUEEN ANNE’S UPBRINGING, EDUCATION, AND THEIR IMPACT ON HER REIGN AND INFLUENCE OVER THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND A Thesis submitted by Troy A. Heffernan, BA, MA For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2017 I ABSTRACT Three hundred years of historical study has shaped current understandings of Queen Anne, but little has been written about the influence she believed she held in shaping England’s politics and religion, or how both shaped her actions as Queen and Supreme Governor of the Church of England. This thesis begins by examining the implications of Anne’s unremarkable place in the line of succession. It assesses why the Catholic suspicions surrounding her father and uncle (James, Duke of York and King Charles II) unexpectedly shaped the approach of a future queen regnant to her sovereignty. An evaluation of Anne’s upbringing and beliefs concerning the Church’s role in government and society establishes that her political and religious views were defined before and during James II’s reign, leading up to the 1688 Revolution, and continued to mature throughout William III’s rule. The consequence of the political landscape she inherited, and her education and beliefs, is that she was destined to face conflict with the Whig-majority in the House of Lords and Whig-sympathetic bishops in the episcopate. After Anne became queen, she attempted to protect the Church by increasing its voting influence in Parliament and the episcopate by filling the episcopal bench with Tory-sympathetic bishops who shared her vision. She was nonetheless often defeated by her inability to combat the Whiggish strength in Parliament and influence in the episcopate that had grown during William’s reign, but Anne adapted and she represents a new expression of monarchical rule with minimal royal prerogative or authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Genealogy
    Monarchs Since the Norman Conquest in 1066 House of Normandy (1066-1154) William I the Conqueror Birth 1027/1028, Falaise, Normandy, France Death 7 SEP 1087, Near Rouen, France Burial St Stephen Abbey, Caen, Normandy Father Duke Robert the Devil Mother Herleva Family: Matilda of Flanders Marriage 1053 1. Robert Curthose, Duke of Normandy 2. Richard 3. William II Rufus, King of England 4. Abbess Cecilia of Holy Trinity 5. Agatha 6. Adeliza a nun 7. Adela 8. Matilda 9. Constance 10. Henry I Beauclerc, King of England NOTES: (Reign: 1066-1087) William of the House of Normandy; The first Norman King; On 28 Sep 1066 William secured the sanction of Pope Alexander II for a Norman invasion of England. By 1070 the Norman conquest of England was complete. In 1085 the Domesday Survey was begun and all England was recorded so William knew exactly what his new kingdom contained. William introduced the Continental system of feudalism; by the Oath of Salisbury of 1086 all landlords swore allegiance to William, thus establishing the precedent that a vassal's loyalty to the king overrode his fealty to his immediate lord. During a campaign against King Philip I of France, William fell from a horse and was fatally injured. William was the illegitimate son of Robert I, duke of Normandy and Arletta, a tanner's daughter. He is sometimes called "William the Bastard". William II Rufus Birth 1056/1060, Normandy, France Death 2 AUG 1100, New Forest Burial Winchester, Cathedral Father William I the Conqueror, King of England Mother Matilda of Flanders NOTES: (Reign: 1087-1100) William was not a popular king, given to extravagance and cruelty.
    [Show full text]
  • Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2017 Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760 Amy Oberlin Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Oberlin, Amy, "Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760" (2017). Dissertations. 2835. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2835 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright © 2017 Amy Oberlin LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO "LOVE AND LOYAL ACTIONS": RITUAL AFFECT AND ROYAL AUTHORITY, 1688-1760 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN HISTORY BY AMY B. OBERLIN CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 2017 Copyright by Amy Oberlin, 2017 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of a large number of people. My dissertation supervisor, Robert Bucholz, took me on as his student shortly after I entered the Ph.D. program in 2010. However, his influence and inspiration in my life began at the very start of my graduate studies when I took his Early Modern England class as a new graduate student studying for my Master's degree in medieval history. His passion for his topic reignited my own interest in the period. His kindness and dedication to all of his students was evident and inspiring from the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Programme
    Conference Programme Royal Holloway, University of London Egham Hill Egham Surrey TW20 0EX Contents Conference Timetable 1 Abstracts 16 Biographies 61 Email addresses 79 Conference Timetable Monday 2nd April 8.45-9.15am: Registration and coffee 9.30-9.35am: Introductions 9.35-10.45am: Session 1 Plenary Lecture Moore Building, Management Auditorium [Chair: Maria Hayward, University of Southampton] Philip Mansel Dressed to Rule: Dress and Monarchy from Louis XIV to Elizabeth II 10.45-11.10am: Coffee 11.10am-12.10pm: Session 2 Panel 2A: The Physical Body of Queens in the Eighteenth Century Moore Building, MBSO-16 [Chair: John W. McCormack, University of Notre Dame] Federica Contu, University of Studies of Cagliari Reasoning about the Political and the Spiritual Function of the Body: The case of Marie Clotilde of France, Queen of Sardinia Sebastian Edwards, Historic Royal Palaces ‘Sleep was never more welcome to a weary traveller’: Queen Anne and the Art of Dying 1 Panel 2B: The Effigial Body Moore Building, MBSO-02/03 [Chair: Jutta Schwarzkopf, University of Bielefeld] Lynsey McCulloch, Anglia Ruskin University The Effigial Body: Reading a Relic of Early Modern Monarchy Kosana Jovanovic, University of Rijeka The Role of Portable Effigies in Queens’ Funeral Ceremonies and Their Connection with the King’s Two Bodies Theory Panel 2C: Representing the Body: The Case of Queen Victoria and King George V and VI Moore Building, MBSO-04/05 [Chair: Kate Strasdin, University of Southampton] Tracy Anderson, University of Sussex Regina Imperatrix: The Royal and Imperial Bodies of Queen Victoria Ina Zweiniger-Bargielowska, University of Illinois (Chicago) Royal Death and Living Memorials: The Commemoration of George V and George VI Panel 2D: Memory and Commemoration: The Case of Henry VII Moore Building, Executive Seminar Room [Chair: Nicola Clark, Royal Holloway, University of London] Christine Merie Fox, Royal Holloway, University of London Henry VII’s Preparation for the Wellbeing of his ‘spiritual body’ Mark R.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles II: Art & Power’ There Were 214 Items Ranging from Letters to Furniture
    • In the exhibition ‘Charles II: Art & Power’ there were 214 items ranging from letters to furniture. This talk focuses on the paintings of which there about 60 from which about 25 have been selected. References • Ed. Rufus Bird and Martin Clayton, Charles II: Art & Power, Royal Collection Trust, • Brett Dolman, Beauty, Sex and Power: A Story of Debauchery and Decadent Art at the Late Stuart Court (1660-1714). The book’s biggest fault is that it has no index. • Maureen Waller, 1700: Scenes from London Life, an easy to read summary of life during the late Stuart period. • Elizabeth Prettejohn, Beauty and Art. • And, as always, Wikipedia and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. 1 Unknown Dutch artist, Charles I, 1600-1649, reigned 1625-1649 (‘The Execution of Charles I’), c. 1649, 163.2 x 296.8 cm, Scottish National Portrait Gallery • It is 1660 and the king was beheaded eleven years ago, the English Civil War is over and the experiment with the Commonwealth has left the country disorientated. Notes • The Restoration followed a turbulent twenty years that included three English Civil Wars (1642-46, 1648-9 and 1649-51), the execution of Charles I in 1649, the Commonwealth of England (1649-53) and the Protectorate (1653-59) under Oliver Cromwell’s (1599-1658) personal rule. • Following the Restoration of the Stuarts, a small number of court mistresses and beauties are renowned for their influence over Charles II and his courtiers. They were immortalised by Sir Peter Lely (pronounced ‘lay-lee’) as the ‘Windsor Beauties’. Another set of portraits known as the ‘Hampton Court Beauties’ were painted by Godfrey Kneller (1646-1723) during the reign of William III and Mary II are also on display at Hampton Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Darren Scott Layne Phd Thesis
    SPINES OF THE THISTLE THE POPULAR CONSTITUENCY OF THE JACOBITE RISING IN 1745-6 Darren Scott Layne A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2016 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/8868 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence SPINES OF THE THISTLE The Popular Constituency of the Jacobite Rising in 1745-6 DARREN SCOTT LAYNE This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of St Andrews September 2015 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the social record of popular Jacobitism during the 1745 Rising as expressed through its plebeian constituency. Such an assessment fills in the gaps largely ignored by scholars of the Jacobite period, who instead tend to concentrate upon the elites and the political and doctrinal ideologies espoused by influential gentry. Using a purpose-built database to compile and analyse a large number of resources including lists of prisoners, trial records, muster rolls, and government papers, a prosopographical survey of over 15,000 persona entries is presented. The study looks at four thematic aspects of popular Jacobitism, which describe motivation, constituency, recruitment, and consequences. These combine to provide a social profile of the ‘lesser sort’ of those persons involved in rebellion against the Hanoverian government, whether martial or civilian. The results suggest that practicality was a major influence in drawing the common people into civil war, and that the ideological tenets of Jacobitism, much diluted by 1745, took a backseat to issues of necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Britain: Performances of Stuart Succession in Dublin, Edinburgh, and London
    RESTORING BRITAIN: PERFORMANCES OF STUART SUCCESSION IN DUBLIN, EDINBURGH, AND LONDON by Deirdre O’Rourke BA, Washington University in St. Louis, 2006 Masters of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Deirdre O’Rourke It was defended on April 2, 2014 and approved by Dr. Attilio Favorini, Professor Emeritus, Theatre Arts Dr. Bruce McConachie, Professor, Theatre Arts Dr. Jennifer Waldron, Assistant Professor, English Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Lisa Jackson-Schebetta, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts ii Copyright © by Deirdre O’Rourke 2014 iii RESTORING BRITAIN: PERFORMANCES OF STUART SUCCESSION IN DUBLIN, EDINBURGH, AND LONDON Deirdre O’Rourke, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 Though much worthy scholarship exists about English Restoration theatre, few studies examine the intersections between theatrical activity in London and its British “sister” cities of Dublin and Edinburgh and the stakes of Stuart restoration and British union for all three kingdoms expressed through theatre and performance. This dissertation is a historiographical reconfiguration of the Restoration period that analyzes how theatre and performance in Dublin, Edinburgh, and London contributed to Charles II’s reestablishment of Stuart rule and British union. My project brings together new British history and performance studies to uncover the British theatrical and cultural performances that re-defined union during Charles II’s restoration. I examine Stuart succession through three case-studies: beheadings, Shakespeare adaptations, and the actress.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward IV Has a Descendents
    Descendants of Edward IV Generation 1 1. EDWARD IV was born on Apr 28, 1442. He died on Apr 09, 1483 in Westminster, London, England. He married Elizabeth Woodville (daughter of Richard Wydevill and Jacquetta de Luxembourg) on May 01, 1464. She was born about 1437 in Grafton Regis, Northamptonshire County, England. She died on Jun 08, 1492. Notes for Edward IV: "Edward of York was born on April 28, 1442, at Rouen in France, the second son of Richard Plantagenet, 3rd Duke of York (a leading claimant to the throne of England) and Cecily Neville. He was the eldest of the four sons who survived to adulthood. York's challenge to the ruling family marked the beginning of the conflict known as the Wars of the Roses. When his father was killed in 1460, at the Battle of Wakefield, pressing his claim against the Lancastrian king, Henry VI of England, Edward inherited his claim. King Edward IV is my 19th cousin, 14 times removed. Our ancestors in common are Eystein Glumra Ivarsson and his wife, Aseda Rognvaldsdatter. They are ninth century Vikings of Norway. "With the support of Richard Neville, 16th Earl of Warwick ("The Kingmaker"), Edward, already showing great promise as a leader of men, defeated the Lancastrians in a succession of battles. While Henry and his militant queen, Margaret of Anjou, were campaigning in the north, Warwick gained control of the capital and had Edward declared king in London in 1461. Edward strengthened his claim with a decisive victory at the Battle of Towton in the same year, in the course of which the Lancastrian army was virtually wiped out.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican History 1 Anglican History
    Anglican History 1 Anglican History ENGLAND AND THE REFORMATION 4 Issues of the Late Medieval Church 4 The Papacy's Involvement in Political Affairs 4 The Glossa Ordinaria and Authority of Scripture 4 Selling of Indulgences 4 Church Corruption 5 Via Moderna and Grace 6 Lack of Lay Participation in Mass 6 The Continental Reformation 6 Cultural and Philosophical Background 6 Types of Reformation 8 The Main Protestant Reformers of the Continent 9 Reformation Theology: The Solae 9 The English Reformation 10 Henry VIII 10 Cranmer and the Prayer Books under Edward VI 11 Queen Mary: The Last Roman Resurgence 14 ELIZABETHAN SETTLEMENT 15 Elizabeth and Unity 15 Dissenters 17 Roman Catholic Recusants 17 Puritans 18 Rev. J. Wesley Evans Anglican History 2 ANGLICAN VS. PURITAN 20 The House of Stuart: King James I 20 The English Civil War 21 King Charles I 21 Archbishop William Laud 22 Start of the War 22 Religion under the Long Parliament 24 Interregnum: Rump Parliament and Oliver Cromwell 28 Anglican Ascendancy 30 Restoration of the Monarchy and Episcopacy 30 Caroline Divines 33 Last of the Stuarts and the Glorious Revolution 33 THE OXFORD MOVEMENT 35 The Church in the 18-19th Century 35 Church and Society 35 Liberalism and Deism 37 Evangelical Revival 37 Old Highchurchman 40 High Church in context 40 Hackney Phalanx 40 Theological Outlook 40 Keble and National Apostasy 41 The Catalyst in Ireland 41 The Spark of the Movement 41 The Tractarians 43 The Movement 43 The Tracts 44 The Movement fractures 45 Tract 90 45 Ritualist Controversy 48 Anglo-Catholic Legacy 50 Worship and Practice 50 Theology 50 Ecumenical 50 Tensions/Problems? 50 ANGLICANISM IN AMERICA 51 Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • The Windsor and Hampton Court Beauties
    • It is 1660, the English Civil War is over and the experiment with the Commonwealth has left the country confused. When Charles II was invited back to England as King he brought new French styles and sexual conduct with him. In particular, he introduced the French idea of the publically accepted mistress. Beautiful women who could attract the eye of the king could become his mistress and influence appointments at Court and political debate. • The new freedoms introduced by the Reformation Court spread through society. Women could act for the first time, write books and one was the first British scientist. However, it was a male dominated society and so these heroic women had to fight against established norms and laws. Notes • The Restoration followed the execution of Charles I in 1649, three English Civil Wars (1642-46, 1648-9 and 1649-51), the Commonwealth of England (1649-53) and the Protectorate (1653-59) under Oliver Cromwell’s (1599-1658) personal rule. • Following the Restoration of the Stuarts, a small number of court mistresses and beauties are renowned for their influence over Charles II and his courtiers. They were immortalised by Sir Peter Lely as the ‘Windsor Beauties’. Today, I will talk about Charles II and his mistresses, Peter Lely and those portraits as well as another set of portraits known as the ‘Hampton Court Beauties’ which were painted by Godfrey Kneller (1646-1723) during the reign of William III and Mary II. • Some historians believe the mistresses of Charles II had a significant impact but it is likely that they had more influence on court appointments than on policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Traditions During the Reign of Queen Anne", Written by Sister Mary
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1940 The oS cial Traditions During the Reign of Queen Anne M. Benedicta Koller Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Koller, M. Benedicta, "The ocS ial Traditions During the Reign of Queen Anne" (1940). Master's Theses. Paper 246. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/246 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1940 M. Benedicta Koller THE SOCIAL TRADITIONS DURING THE REIGN OF QUEEN ~ BY SISTER M BENEDICTA KOLLER, O.S.B. A Thesis submitted in partial :f'ul.fillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Loyola University, 1940. I ~' /) T.l:BLE OF CONTENTS PAGE GENEALOGICAL TABLE OF THE STEWARTS . 1 THE STUARTS OF ENGLAND • . iv INTRODUCTION •• . v CHAPTER I THE CHARACTER OF Q,UEEN .ANNE . 1 CHAPTER II Q,UEEN .ANNE I s ENGLAN'D • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 24 CHAPTER III SOCIAL LIFE OF THE REIGN OF Q,UEEN ANNE • • • • • • 63 CHAPTER IV CRA.BACTERISTICS OF TBlll .AGE OF .ANNE • • . 98 CONCLUSION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '136 :SI:SLIOGR.APBY . 139 - 1 GINEALOGICAL TABLE OF TH:£ STEWARTS 1. WALTER FITZALAN Son of Alan Fitz Flaald and Avelina Heading. First Steward of Scotland; founded the Abbey of Paisley in 1164. Died in 1177. 2 • .ALAN I TEE HIGH STEWART Son of Walter, whom he succeeded in 1177.
    [Show full text]