GEOL G114 Dinosaurs and Their Relatives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GEOL G114 Dinosaurs and Their Relatives GEOL G114 Spring 2017 Dinosaurs and Their Relatives Tutorial on phylogenetic trees and synapomorphies Phylogenetic trees show the relationships of groups of organisms. In paleontology, the evidence for phylogeny comes from analysis of characters of the skeleton (or other fossilizeable parts). This exercise introduces the terminology of trees and characters. It also explains how trees are constructed from characters. An answer key to the practice questions appears at the end of this guide starting on page 9. Tree terminology Phylogenetic trees show the evolutionary connections between taxa. They are made up of branches (the lines), nodes (connection points between lines), and tips (the groups or taxa at the ends of the lines). This tree has seven tips, six nodes (numbered 1 to 6), and twelve branches. The node that is furthest from the tips is also known as the root (Node 1). Another common name for phylogenetic tree is cladogram. Regardless of how the tree is drawn, “down” is the direction along a branch toward the root and “up” is toward the tips. tip Ankylosaurus Triceratops Pachycephalosaurus Edmontosaurus Diplodocus Tyrannosaurus Velociraptor 4 6 3 5 2 branch node 1 Root (lowermost node) Figure 1. A typical phylogenetic tree Phylogenetic trees show patterns of ancestry. Each node represents an ancestor of all the tips that lie above it. If you trace the branches of two tips down the tree, the node where the two paths meet is said to represent their last common ancestor. Node 4 is the last common ancestor of Triceratops and Pachycephalosaurus, and Node 2 is the last common ancestor of Triceratops, Pachycephalosaurus, Edmontosaurus, and Ankylosaurus. The term last is used because deeper nodes Indiana University | Department of Geological Sciences © 2017, P. David Polly are also ancestors. For example, Node 1 is an ancestor of all four tips just mentioned, but it is not the uppermost or last. Practice questions 1. Which node is the last common ancestor of Diplodocus and Velociraptor? 2. Which node is the last common ancestor of Diplodocus and Triceratops? 3. Which node is the last common ancestor of Edmontosaurus and Tyrannosaurus? 4. Name all the tips descended from Node 3. Nodes represent groups (clades) Each node of a tree is equivalent to a group or clade. A clade, also known as a monophyletic group, is often defined as all of the descendants of a common ancestor. Node 2 thus represents a group containing Triceratops, Pachycephalosaurus, Edmontosaurus, and Ankylosaurus, as well as the nodes that lie above it (Nodes 3 & 4). Node 2 is equivalent to the group Ornithischia. Ankylosaurus Velociraptor Triceratops Pachycephalosaurus Edmontosaurus Diplodocus Tyrannosaurus 4 6 3 5 2 1 Figure 2. Tree highlighting the clade defined by Node 2, which consists of Triceratops, Pachycephalosaurus, Edmontosaurus, and Ankylosaurus, as well as Nodes 3 and 4. The clade defined by Node 2 also includes descendants that are not explicitly included on this tree. For example, Stegosaurus would also be part of the clade defined by Node 2 because it is closely related to Ankylosaurus. Practice question 5. What tips and nodes are included in the clade defined by Node 5? Indiana University | Department of Geological Sciences © 2017, P. David Polly 2 Trees can be drawn in many ways The information contained in a tree comes from the connections between nodes, not the angle it is drawn or whether the branches are angled, square, or round. The following trees are all the same except for their artistry and the number of tip taxa. Triceratops 4 3 Pachycephalosaurus 2 Edmontosaurus Ankylosaurus Triceratops Pachycephalosaurus Edmontosaurus Diplodocus Tyrannosaurus Velociraptor Ankylosaurus Diplodocus Tyrannosaurus Velociraptor Edmontosaurus Pachycephalosaurus Triceratops 4 1 Ankylosaurus 6 6 4 3 5 Diplodocus 5 3 2 2 5 Tyrannosaurus 6 A 1 B Velociraptor 1 C Velociraptor Ankylosaurus Triceratops Pachycephalosaurus Edmontosaurus Diplodocus Tyrannosaurus Velociraptor Triceratops Edmontosaurus Tyrannosaurus Ankylosaurus Edmontosaurus Tyrannosaurus Pachycephalosaurus Diplodocus Triceratops 4 6 4 6 3 5 2 3 5 3 2 Pruned tree 1 1 D E 1 Figure 3. The same tree drawn in several different styles. Four taxa have been pruned in E to construct a simplified tree that focuses on just Triceratops, Edmontosaurus, and Tyrannosaurus. Even though these trees are drawn differently, they all show the same pattern of relationships and common ancestry. For example, Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor are each other’s closest relatives and Edmontosaurus always shares a closer common ancestor with Triceratops than it does with Tyrannosaurus. Contrast the similarity in these trees with the differences in the trees in the following figure. Ankylosaurus Ankylosaurus Triceratops Diplodocus Velociraptor Edmontosaurus Tyrannosaurus Triceratops Edmontosaurus Pachycephalosaurus Diplodocus Tyrannosaurus Velociraptor Pachycephalosaurus Tyrannosaurus Triceratops Edmontosaurus A B C Figure 4. Three trees that show very different relationships from those in Figure 3. The node labels have been removed because they are no longer equivalent between trees. Practice Question 6. Which trees in Figure 4 show Edmontosaurus to be more closely related to Triceratops than to Tyrannosaurus? Indiana University | Department of Geological Sciences © 2017, P. David Polly 3 Phylogenetic definitions Phylogenetic definitions are a way of mapping a group’s name onto a particular node of a tree. Figure 5. Phylogenetic definition of Dinosauria is equivalent to the clade defined by Node 1 on this tree. The red lines trace Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus to their common ancestor, and all descendants of that ancestor therefore belong to Dinosauria (which is all 7 taxa on the tree) Dinosauria is defined as the clade consisting of the last common ancestor of Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus and all descendants of that ancestor. To put the definition into action, first trace down from the two tips to find the node where they join: Node 1. Dinosauria is therefore the clade consisting of all tips and nodes upward from there (including ones that have not been drawn on this tree, like Stegosaurus). Practice questions Note that nodes correspond to dinosaur groups as follows: Node 2 = Ornithisichia; Node 3 = Cerapoda; Node 4 = Marginocephalia; Node 5 = Saurischia; Node 6 = Theropoda. 7. Give a phylogenetic definition for Saurischia. 8. Give a phylogenetic definition for Cerapoda. 9. Trace your phylogenetic definition for Saurischia on the trees in Figure 3. Does it pinpoint the same node? What about the trees in Figure 4? If new evidence falsifies a phylogenetic tree, the definition does not change but the taxa included in a clade might. For example, if Tyrannosaurus was shown to be closely related to Edmontosaurus (Figure 6), then Ankylosaurus, Diplodocus, and Velociraptor would no longer be dinosaurs. Indiana University | Department of Geological Sciences © 2017, P. David Polly 4 Figure 6. Hypothetical tree in which Tyrannosaurus is closely related to Edmontosaurus. If this were true, the node specified by the definition of Dinosauria would shift and Ankylosaurus, Diplodocus, and Velociraptor would no longer be included. Practice questions 10. If the tree in Figure 6 were true, would Ornithischia be a subgroup of Dinosauria? 11. Would Cerapoda be a subgroup of Dinosauria? Trees at their bare minimum As diagrams, phylogenetic trees are flexible. They can be drawn in any orientation or with as many or as few taxa as the situation demands. Minimally a tree must have three taxa because any fewer would not convey information about which ones are more closely related. Here are four trees that have been pruned down to three taxa, but remain consistent with Figure 1. Even though these are drawn with vertical lines instead of diagonal ones, you read them the same. Node numbers are shown to help you see the relationship. Ankylosaurus Ankylosaurus Ankylosaurus Triceratops Triceratops Pachycephalosaurus Edmontosaurus Diplodocus Diplodocus Triceratops Tyrannosaurus Triceratops 3 2 2 4 1 1 1 2 A B C D Figure 7. Three-taxon trees derived from the tree in Figure 1. Indiana University | Department of Geological Sciences © 2017, P. David Polly 5 Practice questions 12. Using the same numbering system as Figure 1, put numbers on the nodes of the following trees: Diplodocus Diplodocus Velociraptor Edmontosaurus Velociraptor Tyrannosaurus Edmontosaurus Triceratops Triceratops Edmontosaurus Tyrannosaurus Tyrannosaurus A B C D 13. What clade names correspond to the nodes at the root of each of these four trees? 14. Why do trees A, B and C have the same root nodes even though they have different tip taxa? 15. Six different three-taxon trees can be constructed to show Nodes 1 and 3. What are they? Characters and trees Phylogenetic trees are built from observations from fossils. Specifically, trees are constructed from characters. First some definitions: Synapomorphies are characters that are shared by members of a clade that they inherited from their last common ancestor. Example: mesotarsal ankle joint is a synapomorphy of Dinosauria. Homoplasies are characters that evolved independently in two groups and were not found in their last common ancestor. Example: posteriorly pointing pubis is a homoplasy of Ornithischia and Maniraptora. (Note that a posteriorly pointing pubis is a synapomorphy of each one of those groups, but a homoplasy between them). Reversals are characters that were originally found in the last common ancestor of a clade, but were subsequently lost in one or more of its members. Example: the loss of the antorbital fenestra in some Thyreophora is a reversal. The characters In this section, we will consider the characters in the following table. Characters that are present in each taxon are shown with a “Y” (meaning “yes” the character is present in that taxon). For example, Ankylosaurus has a mesotarsal ankle joint, a pubis that points backwards, and a palpebral bone, but it does not have a gap in the cheek teeth or a crest on the squamosal and parietal bones. Indiana University | Department of Geological Sciences © 2017, P. David Polly 6 Ankylosaurus Triceratops Pachycephalosaur Edmontosaurus Diplodocus Tyrannosaurus Velociraptor A.
Recommended publications
  • A Neoceratopsian Dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia And
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01222-7 OPEN A neoceratopsian dinosaur from the early Cretaceous of Mongolia and the early evolution of ceratopsia ✉ Congyu Yu 1 , Albert Prieto-Marquez2, Tsogtbaatar Chinzorig 3,4, Zorigt Badamkhatan4,5 & Mark Norell1 1234567890():,; Ceratopsia is a diverse dinosaur clade from the Middle Jurassic to Late Cretaceous with early diversification in East Asia. However, the phylogeny of basal ceratopsians remains unclear. Here we report a new basal neoceratopsian dinosaur Beg tse based on a partial skull from Baruunbayan, Ömnögovi aimag, Mongolia. Beg is diagnosed by a unique combination of primitive and derived characters including a primitively deep premaxilla with four pre- maxillary teeth, a trapezoidal antorbital fossa with a poorly delineated anterior margin, very short dentary with an expanded and shallow groove on lateral surface, the derived presence of a robust jugal having a foramen on its anteromedial surface, and five equally spaced tubercles on the lateral ridge of the surangular. This is to our knowledge the earliest known occurrence of basal neoceratopsian in Mongolia, where this group was previously only known from Late Cretaceous strata. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that it is sister to all other neoceratopsian dinosaurs. 1 Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York 10024, USA. 2 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, ICTA-ICP, Edifici Z, c/de les Columnes s/n Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. 3 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 4 Institute of Paleontology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, ✉ Ulaanbaatar 15160, Mongolia.
    [Show full text]
  • MEET the DINOSAURS! WHAT’S in a NAME? a LOT If You Are a Dinosaur!
    MEET THE DINOSAURS! WHAT’S IN A NAME? A LOT if you are a dinosaur! I will call you Dyoplosaurus! Most dinosaurs get their names from the ancient Greek and Latin languages. And I will call you Mojoceratops! And sometimes they are named after a defining feature on their body. Their names are made up of word parts that describe the dinosaur. The name must be sent to a special group of people called the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to be approved! Did You The word DINOSAUR comes from the Greek word meaning terrible lizard and was first said by Know? Sir Richard Owen in 1841. © 2013 Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium® | 3 SEE IF YOU CAN FIND OUT THE MEANING OF SOME OF OUR DINOSAUR’S NAMES. Dinosaur names are not just tough to pronounce, they often have meaning. Dinosaur Name MEANING of Dinosaur Name Carnotaurus (KAR-no-TORE-us) Means “flesh-eating bull” Spinosaurus (SPY-nuh-SORE-us) Dyoplosaurus (die-o-pluh-SOR-us) Amargasaurus (ah-MAR-guh-SORE-us) Omeisaurus (Oh-MY-ee-SORE-us) Pachycephalosaurus (pak-ee-SEF-uh-low-SORE-us) Tuojiangosaurus (toh-HWANG-uh-SORE-us) Yangchuanosaurus (Yang-chew-ON-uh-SORE-us) Quetzalcoatlus (KWET-zal-coe-AT-lus) Ouranosaurus (ooh-RAN-uh-SORE-us) Parasaurolophus (PAIR-uh-so-ROL-uh-PHUS) Kosmoceratops (KOZ-mo-SARA-tops) Mojoceratops (moe-joe-SEH-rah-tops) Triceratops (try-SER-uh-TOPS) Tyrannosaurus rex (tuh-RAN-uh-SORE-us) Find the answers by visiting the Resource Library at Carnotaurus A: www.OmahaZoo.com/Education. Search word: Dinosaurs 4 | © 2013 Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium® DINO DEFENSE All animals in the wild have to protect themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • At Carowinds
    at Carowinds EDUCATOR’S GUIDE CLASSROOM LESSON PLANS & FIELD TRIP ACTIVITIES Table of Contents at Carowinds Introduction The Field Trip ................................... 2 The Educator’s Guide ....................... 3 Field Trip Activity .................................. 4 Lesson Plans Lesson 1: Form and Function ........... 6 Lesson 2: Dinosaur Detectives ....... 10 Lesson 3: Mesozoic Math .............. 14 Lesson 4: Fossil Stories.................. 22 Games & Puzzles Crossword Puzzles ......................... 29 Logic Puzzles ................................. 32 Word Searches ............................... 37 Answer Keys ...................................... 39 Additional Resources © 2012 Dinosaurs Unearthed Recommended Reading ................. 44 All rights reserved. Except for educational fair use, no portion of this guide may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any Dinosaur Data ................................ 45 means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other without Discovering Dinosaurs .................... 52 explicit prior permission from Dinosaurs Unearthed. Multiple copies may only be made by or for the teacher for class use. Glossary .............................................. 54 Content co-created by TurnKey Education, Inc. and Dinosaurs Unearthed, 2012 Standards www.turnkeyeducation.net www.dinosaursunearthed.com Curriculum Standards .................... 59 Introduction The Field Trip From the time of the first exhibition unveiled in 1854 at the Crystal
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-01-25 Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores Borkovic, Benjamin Borkovic, B. (2013). Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26635 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/498 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores by Benjamin Borkovic A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2013 © Benjamin Borkovic 2013 Abstract Evidence for sexual dimorphism was investigated in the horncores of two ceratopsid dinosaurs, Triceratops and Centrosaurus apertus. A review of studies of sexual dimorphism in the vertebrate fossil record revealed methods that were selected for use in ceratopsids. Mountain goats, bison, and pronghorn were selected as exemplar taxa for a proof of principle study that tested the selected methods, and informed and guided the investigation of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs. Skulls of these exemplar taxa were measured in museum collections, and methods of analysing morphological variation were tested for their ability to demonstrate sexual dimorphism in their horns and horncores.
    [Show full text]
  • New Book Catalog
    New Book Catalog www.doverpublications.com Winter 2020 Connect with us! New Books for a OVER 50 NEW TITLES! New Year! Save 25% on 50 Favorites! Take an Additional $10 Off & Free Shipping See pages 46–47 See page 2 New Book Q1 2020 01-09.indd 1 12/5/19 11:03 AM 2020: New Year, New You $10 off your order of $40 or more TO REDEEM: When ordering by mail or fax, please IXIA PRESS NEW! enter the coupon code in the title column on the last Named after the South African flower that represents happiness, line of the order form. When ordering online, enter the Ixia Press presents inspiring books on leadership, business, spirituality, NEW! coupon code during checkout. and wellness that foster a spirit of personal and professional growth PLEASE NOTE: You must provide the Coupon Code Use to receive your discount. Orders must be received by and exploration. The imprint combines completely original works with seminal February 22, 2020. Shipping and handling, taxes, Coupon and gift certificates do not apply toward the classics given a fresh new lease on life, all written by some of the most respected Code purchase requirement. We reserve the right to change or discontinue this offer at any time. Your authors in their fields. merchandise total after your coupon deduction must CNWC be $50 or more to be eligible for Free Shipping. Can’t be combined with any other coupon. Reader-friendly handbook is structured around the ways in which crystals can Offer Ends 2/22/20 be used to improve specifi c life areas HIGHLIGHTS Valentine’s Day .
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Ceratopsia Or Horned Dinosaurs
    MEMOIRS OF THE PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME III, 1 A.R1 A REVISION orf tneth< CERATOPSIA OR HORNED DINOSAURS BY RICHARD SWANN LULL STERLING PROFESSOR OF PALEONTOLOGY AND DIRECTOR OF PEABODY MUSEUM, YALE UNIVERSITY LVXET NEW HAVEN, CONN. *933 MEMOIRS OF THE PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY Volume I. Odontornithes: A Monograph on the Extinct Toothed Birds of North America. By Othniel Charles Marsh. Pp. i-ix, 1-201, pis. 1-34, text figs. 1-40. 1880. To be obtained from the Peabody Museum. Price $3. Volume II. Part 1. Brachiospongidae : A Memoir on a Group of Silurian Sponges. By Charles Emerson Beecher. Pp. 1-28, pis. 1-6, text figs. 1-4. 1889. To be obtained from the Peabody Museum. Price $1. Volume III. Part 1. American Mesozoic Mammalia. By George Gaylord Simp- son. Pp. i-xvi, 1-171, pis. 1-32, text figs. 1-62. 1929. To be obtained from the Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn. Price $5. Part 2. A Remarkable Ground Sloth. By Richard Swann Lull. Pp. i-x, 1-20, pis. 1-9, text figs. 1-3. 1929. To be obtained from the Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn. Price $1. Part 3. A Revision of the Ceratopsia or Horned Dinosaurs. By Richard Swann Lull. Pp. i-xii, 1-175, pis. I-XVII, text figs. 1-42. 1933. To be obtained from the Peabody Museum. Price $5 (bound in cloth), $4 (bound in paper). Part 4. The Merycoidodontidae, an Extinct Group of Ruminant Mammals. By Malcolm Rutherford Thorpe. In preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Histology and Ontogeny of Pachyrhinosaurus Nasal Bosses By
    Histology and Ontogeny of Pachyrhinosaurus Nasal Bosses by Elizabeth Kruk A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Systematics and Evolution Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta © Elizabeth Kruk, 2015 Abstract Pachyrhinosaurus is a peculiar ceratopsian known only from Upper Cretaceous strata of Alberta and the North Slope of Alaska. The genus consists of three described species Pachyrhinosaurus canadensis, Pachyrhinosaurus lakustai, and Pachyrhinosaurus perotorum that are distinguishable by cranial characteristics, including parietal horn shape and orientation, absence/presence of a rostral comb, median parietal bar horns, and profile of the nasal boss. A fourth species of Pachyrhinosaurus is described herein and placed into its phylogenetic context within Centrosaurinae. This new species forms a polytomy at the crown with Pachyrhinosaurus canadensis and Pachyrhinosaurus perotorum, with Pachyrhinosaurus lakustai falling basal to that polytomy. The diagnostic features of this new species are an apomorphic, laterally curved Process 3 horns and a thick longitudinal ridge separating the supraorbital bosses. Another focus is investigating the ontogeny of Pachyrhinosaurus nasal bosses in a histological context. Previously, little work has been done on cranial histology in ceratopsians, focusing instead on potential integumentary structures, the parietals of Triceratops, and how surface texture relates to underlying histological structures. An ontogenetic series is established for the nasal bosses of Pachyrhinosaurus at both relative (subadult versus adult) and fine scale (Stages 1-5). It was demonstrated that histology alone can indicate relative ontogenetic level, but not stages of a finer scale. Through Pachyrhinosaurus ontogeny the nasal boss undergoes increased vascularity and secondary remodeling with a reduction in osteocyte lacunar density.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Horned Dinosaur from an Upper Cretaceous Bone Bed in Alberta
    Darren H. Tanke Darren H. Tanke Langston, Jr. Wann Philip J. Currie, Philip J. Currie is a professor and Canada In the first monographic treatment of Research Chair at The University of Alberta Philip J. Currie, Wann Langston, Jr., & Darren H. Tanke a horned (ceratopsid) dinosaur in almost a (Department of Biological Sciences), is an Adjunct century, this monumental volume presents Professor at the University of Calgary, and was for- merly the Curator of Dinosaurs at the Royal Tyrrell one of the closest looks at the anatomy, re- Museum of Palaeontology. He took his B.Sc. at the lationships, growth and variation, behavior, University of Toronto in 1972, and his M.Sc. and ecology and other biological aspects of a sin- Ph.D. at McGill in 1975 and 1981. He is a Fellow of gle dinosaur species. The research, which was the Royal Society of Canada (1999) and a member A New Horned conducted over two decades, was possible of the Explorers Club (2001). He has published more because of the discovery of a densely packed than 100 scientific articles, 95 popular articles and bonebed near Grande Prairie, Alberta. The fourteen books, focussing on the growth and varia- tion of extinct reptiles, the anatomy and relationships Dinosaur From an locality has produced abundant remains of a of carnivorous dinosaurs, and the origin of birds. new species of horned dinosaur (ceratopsian), Fieldwork connected with his research has been con- and parts of at least 27 individual animals centrated in Alberta, Argentina, British Columbia, were recovered. China, Mongolia, the Arctic and Antarctica.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Maastrichtian Species of the Centrosaurine Ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska
    A new Maastrichtian species of the centrosaurine ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska ANTHONY R. FIORILLO and RONALD S. TYKOSKI Fiorillo, A.R. and Tykoski, R.S. 2012. A new Maastrichtian species of the centrosaurine ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus from the North Slope of Alaska. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57 (3): 561–573. The Cretaceous rocks of the Prince Creek Formation contain the richest record of polar dinosaurs found anywhere in the world. Here we describe a new species of horned dinosaur, Pachyrhinosaurus perotorum that exhibits an apomorphic character in the frill, as well as a unique combination of other characters. Phylogenetic analysis of 16 taxa of ceratopsians failed to resolve relationships between P. perotorum and other Pachyrhinosaurus species (P. canadensis and P. lakustai). P. perotorum shares characters with each of the previously known species that are not present in the other, including very large nasal and supraorbital bosses that are nearly in contact and separated only by a narrow groove as in P. canadensis, and a rostral comb formed by the nasals and premaxillae as in P. lakustai. P. perotorum is the youngest centrosaurine known (70–69 Ma), and the locality that produced the taxon, the Kikak−Tegoseak Quarry, is close to the highest latitude for recovery of ceratopsid remains. Key words: Dinosauria, Centrosaurinae, Cretaceous, Prince Creek Formation, Kikak−Tegoseak Quarry, Arctic. Anthony R. Fiorillo [[email protected]] and Ronald S. Tykoski [[email protected]], Perot Museum of Nature and Science, 2201 N. Field Street, Dallas, TX 75202, USA. Received 4 April 2011, accepted 23 July 2011, available online 26 August 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Horn Use in Triceratops (Dinosauria: Ceratopsidae): Testing Behavioral Hypotheses Using Scale Models
    Palaeontologia Electronica http://palaeo-electronica.org HORN USE IN TRICERATOPS (DINOSAURIA: CERATOPSIDAE): TESTING BEHAVIORAL HYPOTHESES USING SCALE MODELS Andrew A. Farke ABSTRACT Triceratops, a common chasmosaurine ceratopsid dinosaur from the Late Creta- ceous of North America, is known for its cranial ornamentation, including a single nasal horn and large, paired supraorbital horns. It is commonly surmised that Triceratops used its horns in intraspecific combat, but this hypothesis has not been rigorously tested. Scale models of Triceratops skulls were used to determine if it could physically lock horns as has been suggested. Three hypothetical horn locking positions were found, involving varying orientations of the combatants’ skulls. Based on these posi- tions, it was hypothesized that injuries caused by horns were especially likely in certain portions of the frill, jugals, and postorbital horncore tips. This corresponds to some pre- viously reported pathologies in chasmosaurine specimens. Uncertainties in this model- ing exercise center around variations in horn orientation, size, shape, and the possible existence of a keratinous supraorbital horncore sheath. Triceratops differs from modern horned mammals in its horn orientation, which suggests that if it engaged in intraspe- cific combat, its fighting style was quite different from these modern animals. During hypothetical horn locking in Triceratops, most of the force was directed against the medial and lateral surfaces of the horn cores. This has implications for future studies of ceratopsid cranial functional morphology, especially as related to horn architecture and the development of the frontal sinus complex. Andrew A. Farke. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8081, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Warriors
    Dinosaur Warriors Dinosaur Take a step back in time to explore all things dinosaur—from fossil hunters to baby dinosaurs! Read all the books in this series: Owen DROPCAP by Ruth Owen [Intentionally Left Blank] DROPCAP DROPCAPby Ruth Owen Consultant: Dougal Dixon, Paleontologist Member of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology United Kingdom Credits Cover, © James Kuether; 4–5, © James Kuether; 6–7, © James Kuether; 8, © The Natural History Museum/Alamy; 9, © James Kuether; 10–11, © James Kuether; 10B, © Christophe Hendrickx; 12–13, © James Kuether; 14, © The Natural History Museum/Alamy; 15, © James Kuether; 16, © David A. Burnham; 17, © John Weinstein/Field Museum/Getty Images; 18, © James Kuether; 19, © Andrey Gudkov/Dreamstime; 20, © Gaston Design Inc./Robert Gaston/www.gastondesign. com; 21, © Stocktrek Images Inc/Alamy; 22T, © W. Scott McFill/Shutterstock; 22B, © James Kuether; 23T, © Edward Ionescu/Dreamstime; 23B, © benedek/Istock Photo. Publisher: Kenn Goin Senior Editor: Joyce Tavolacci Creative Director: Spencer Brinker Image Researcher: Ruth Owen Books Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Owen, Ruth, 1967– author. Title: Dinosaur warriors / by Ruth Owen. Description: New York, New York : Bearport Publishing, [2019] | Series: The dino-sphere | Includes bibliographical references and index. DROPCAP Identifiers: LCCN 2018049812 (print) | LCCN 2018053176 (ebook) | ISBN 9781642802566 (Ebook) | ISBN 9781642801873 (library) Subjects: LCSH: Dinosaurs—Juvenile literature. Classification: LCC QE861.5 (ebook) | LCC QE861.5 .O8456 2019 (print) | DDC 567.9—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018049812 Copyright © 2019 Ruby Tuesday Books. Published in the United States by Bearport Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, stored in any retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Brusatte Triceratops
    Media Inquiries: Kristin Elise Phillips, Department of Communications March 2009 212-496-3419; [email protected] www.amnh.org _____________________________________________________________________________ WAS TRICERATOPS A SOCIAL ANIMAL? YES, ACCORDING TO A NEW FOSSIL DISCOVERY IN MONTANA’S HOMER SITE Until now, Triceratops was thought to be unusual among its ceratopsid relatives. While many ceratopsids—a common group of herbivorous dinosaurs that lived toward the end of the Cretaceous—have been found in enormous bonebed deposits of multiple individuals, all known Triceratops (over 50 in total) fossils have been solitary individuals. But a new discovery of a jumble of at least three juveniles the badlands of the north-central United States suggests that the three-horned dinosaurs were not only social animals, but may have exhibited unique gregarious groupings of juveniles. “This is very thrilling,” says Stephen Brusatte, an affiliate of the American Museum of Natural History and a doctoral student at Columbia University. “We can say something about how these dinosaurs lived. Interestingly, what we’ve found seems to be a larger pattern among many dinosaurs that juveniles lived and traveled together in groups.” In 2005, Brusatte and colleagues found and excavated a site that contained multiple Triceratops juveniles in 66-million-year-old rocks in southeastern Montana. The geological evidence suggests that at least three juveniles were deposited at the same time by a localized flood, and this suggests that they were probably living together when disaster struck. This find indicates that Triceratops juveniles congregated in small herds, a social behavior increasingly identified in other dinosaur groups, such as Psittacosaurus, a small cousin of Triceratops that lived in Asia.
    [Show full text]