Record of Site Condition # 217569 Record of Site

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217569

Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Record of Site Condition Number 217569 Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/05/26 Certification Date 2014/01/14 Current Property Use Industrial Intended Property Use Residential Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Non-potable Ground Water, Coarse Textured Soil, for Residential property use Property Municipal Address 113 MCMAHON DRIVE, TORONTO, ON, M2K 0C1, 117 MCMAHON DRIVE, TORONTO, ON, M2K 0C1, 115 MCMAHON DRIVE, TORONTO, ON, M2K 0C1

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 1 of 18 PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Authorized Person GABRIEL LEUNG

Mailing Address 23 SPADINA AVENUE, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code M5V 3M5

Phone (416) 813-0999

Fax Email Address

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 2 of 18 RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 113 MCMAHON DRIVE, TORONTO, ON M2K 0C1 115 MCMAHON DRIVE, TORONTO, ON M2K 0C1 117 MCMAHON DRIVE, TORONTO, ON M2K 0C1

Municipality Toronto

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll 1908113020085500000 Number(s)

Property Identifier 10090-0874 (LT) Number(s)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 631,127.00

Northing 4,847,266.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Industrial Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property No Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 3 of 18 Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 4 of 18 PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Qualified Person's Information

Name WILLIAM DAVID LEWIS

Type of Licence Under Licence Professional Engineers Act

Licence Number 90271503

QP Employer Name SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITED

Mailing Address 51 CONSTELLATION COURT, TORONTO ONTARIO, M9W 1K4 CANADA

Phone (416) 798-0065

Fax (416) 798-0518

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Toronto Municipality

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office

District Office Toronto District Office

District Office Address 5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 5 of 18 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components (YYYY/MM/DD) of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) 2015-01-23

Type of Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title Report (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, Lands West of 2013-09-25 David Lewis, SPL CONSULTANTS Provost, Concord Park Place, Toronto, Ontario P.Eng. LIMITED

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, Lands West of 2015-01-23 David Lewis, SPL CONSULTANTS Update Provost, Concord Park Place, Toronto, Ontario P.Eng. LIMITED

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment

Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company

N/A

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 6 of 18 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation (YYYY/MM/DD) components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) 2015-01-14

Type of Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title Report (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company

P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, Lands West of 2011-11-16 David Lewis, SPL CONSULTANTS Provost, Concord Park Place, Toronto, Ontario P.Eng. LIMITED

P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, Lands West of 2015-01-23 David Lewis, SPL CONSULTANTS Update Provost, Concord Park Place, Toronto, Ontario P.Eng. LIMITED

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company . N/A

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 7 of 18 Environmental Condition

Section 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? No

Site Condition Information

Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/01/14 Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 1.27400

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or Yes under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under Yes the property which is used in the RSC?

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or AGAT LABORATORIES sediment

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3

Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2014/10/17

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 8 of 18 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 1 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g 2 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

3 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 4 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g 5 Chloroform < 0.04 0.05 µg/g 6 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g 7 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.05 4.8 µg/g

8 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.05 0.083 µg/g 9 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g 10 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.02 3.5 µg/g 11 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g 12 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g 13 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.02 3.4 µg/g 14 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.084 µg/g 15 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g 16 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.04 0.05 µg/g 17 Ethylene dibromide < 0.04 0.05 µg/g 18 Hexane (n) < 0.05 2.8 µg/g 19 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 16 µg/g 20 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 1.7 µg/g 21 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.75 µg/g 22 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.1 µg/g 23 Styrene < 0.05 0.7 µg/g 24 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.04 0.058 µg/g 25 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

26 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.28 µg/g 27 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.38 µg/g 28 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.04 0.05 µg/g 29 Trichloroethylene < 0.03 0.061 µg/g 30 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g

31 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g 32 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 13 µg/g 33 Bromoform < 0.05 0.27 µg/g 34 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 9.4 µg/g 35 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

...Continued on next page

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 9 of 18 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

Continued from previous page....

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 36 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 2 µg/g 37 Toluene < 0.05 2.3 µg/g 38 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 3.1 µg/g

39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 5 55 µg/g 40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 98 µg/g 41 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 50 300 µg/g 42 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 50 2800 µg/g 43 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.32 1.5 µg/g 44 Chromium VI < 0.2 8 µg/g 45 Cyanide (CN-) < 0.04 0.051 µg/g 46 Electrical Conductivity 0.677 0.7 mS/cm 47 Mercury < 0.1 0.27 µg/g 48 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.69 5 49 Barium 132 390 µg/g 50 Beryllium 0.5 4 µg/g 51 Boron (total) 7 120 µg/g 52 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g 53 Chromium Total 20 160 µg/g 54 Cobalt 7.2 22 µg/g 55 Copper 16 140 µg/g 56 Lead 17 120 µg/g 57 Molybdenum < 0.5 6.9 µg/g 58 Nickel 17 100 µg/g 59 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g

60 Thallium < 0.4 1 µg/g 61 Uranium < 0.5 23 µg/g 62 Vanadium 26 86 µg/g 63 Zinc 58 340 µg/g 64 Antimony < 0.8 7.5 µg/g 65 Arsenic 3 18 µg/g 66 Selenium 0.6 2.4 µg/g

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 10 of 18 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 1 Bromodichloromethane < 0.2 85000 µg/L 2 Bromoform < 0.1 380 µg/L

3 Dibromochloromethane < 0.1 82000 µg/L 4 Benzene < 0.2 44 µg/L 5 Ethylbenzene < 0.1 2300 µg/L 6 Toluene 0.71 18000 µg/L 7 Xylene Mixture < 0.2 4200 µg/L 8 Acetone 104 130000 µg/L 9 Bromomethane < 0.2 5.6 µg/L 10 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L 11 Chlorobenzene 0.1 630 µg/L 12 Chloroform 0.97 2.4 µg/L 13 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.1 4600 µg/L 14 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.3 9600 µg/L 15 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.1 8 µg/L 16 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.2 4400 µg/L 17 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.3 320 µg/L 18 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 19 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.3 1.6 µg/L 20 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 21 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 22 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 16 µg/L 23 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.1 5.2 µg/L 24 Ethylene dibromide < 0.1 0.25 µg/L 25 Hexane (n) < 0.2 51 µg/L

26 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 1 470000 µg/L 27 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 1 140000 µg/L 28 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.2 190 µg/L 29 Methylene Chloride < 0.3 610 µg/L 30 Styrene < 0.1 1300 µg/L

31 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.1 3.3 µg/L 32 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.1 3.2 µg/L 33 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 34 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.3 640 µg/L 35 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.2 4.7 µg/L

...Continued on next page

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 11 of 18 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

Continued from previous page....

Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 36 Trichloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 37 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.4 2500 µg/L 38 Vinyl Chloride < 0.17 0.5 µg/L 39 Barium 1,060 29000 µg/L 40 Beryllium < 1 67 µg/L 41 Boron (total) 40.9 45000 µg/L 42 Cadmium < 0.5 2.7 µg/L 43 Chromium Total 3.03 810 µg/L 44 Cobalt 1.48 66 µg/L 45 Copper 12.9 87 µg/L 46 Lead 0.56 25 µg/L 47 Molybdenum 71 9200 µg/L 48 Nickel 4.31 490 µg/L 49 Silver < 0.5 1.5 µg/L 50 Thallium 0.5 510 µg/L 51 Uranium 1.7 420 µg/L 52 Vanadium 56.9 250 µg/L 53 Zinc 23.3 1100 µg/L 54 Sodium 357,000 2300000 µg/L 55 Chloride 315,000 2300000 µg/L 56 Chromium VI < 5 140 µg/L 57 Cyanide (CN-) < 10 66 µg/L 58 Mercury < 0.1 0.29 µg/L 59 Antimony 1.25 20000 µg/L 60 Arsenic 8.6 1900 µg/L 61 Selenium 5.63 63 µg/L 62 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L 63 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L 64 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 100 500 µg/L 65 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 100 500 µg/L

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 12 of 18 Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Soil Remediation Process (in-ground volume in m³)

None. 0.0

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

Soils exceeding the Standards were removed during bulk excavation for the proposed development.

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 35,000.0

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property 0.0 (in-ground volume in m³)

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 13 of 18 Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

None.

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

None.

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 14 of 18 Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None.

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None.

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None.

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None.

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC Yes property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 15 of 18 Qualified Person’s Statements and Certifications

As the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary. As of 2014/01/14, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC. Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located. As of 2014/01/14, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment. As of 2014/01/14, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held and my employer SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITED does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2014/01/14. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, WILLIAM DAVID LEWIS, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/04/01:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 16 of 18 Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent

The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

6.1.2

Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 17 of 18 Filed Record of Site Condition # 217569 on 2015/05/26 18 of 18 Request ID: 017477012 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/03/30 Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: 57182032 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 16:24:48 Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère des records of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons Services que la société

C O N C O R D A D E X I N V E S T M E N T S L I M I T E D

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) 0 0 2 0 9 8 2 9 5

is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou née amalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la the laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario. The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le M A R C H 2 9 M A R S , 2 0 0 6

and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le M A R C H 3 0 M A R S , 2 0 1 5

Director Directeur

The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services. La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux. AIRD & BERLIS LLP Barristers and Solicitors

Trevor Crowley Direct: 416.865.4640 E-mai 1: tcrowl ey@airdberlis .com

March 30, 2015

DELIVERED

SPL Consultants Limited 180 Shearson Crescent, Unit 5 Cambridge, ON NIT 1P4

Dear Sirs:

Record of Site Condition Block 13 113 McMahon Drive, 115 McMahon Drive and 117 McMahon Drive, City of Toronto

We are the solicitors for Concord Adex Investments Limited, the registered owner of the property that is the subject of the Record of Site Condition (the "RSC Property") and, in this capacity, we confirm as follows:

1. The legal description for the RSC Property is as follows:

All of PIN 10090-0874 (LT)

Block 13 on Plan 66M-2518, City of Toronto.

A copy of PIN 10090-0874 (LT) and Plan 66M-2518 are enclosed for your reference. You will note that this PIN is the result of a split from 10090-0848, which covered the RSC Property as well as a number of other properties that were the subject of Plan 66M-2518. When Plan 66M-2518 was deposited on November 27, 2014, the RSC Property was designated as Block 13. This is why the PIN and legal description as described in this letter are different from the PIN and legal description in the originating transfer.

2. Concord Adex Investments Limited is the sole registered owner of the RSC Property. A Certificate of Status is enclosed showing that the corporation was active as of March 30, 2015.

3. The following Charges are registered against title to the RSC Property:

(a) Instrument No. ATI327689 registered December 7, 2006 is a Charge in favour of Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited.

(b) Instrument No. AT1332175 registered December 14, 2006 is a Charge in

Brookfield Place, 181 Bay Street, Suite 1800, Box 754 • Toronto, ON • M5J 2T9 • Canada T 416.863.1500 F 416.863.1515 www airrihpriic mm Page 2

favour of the Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited.

4. The municipal addresses of the RSC Property are follows:

(a) 113 McMahon Drive, Toronto;

(b) 115 McMahon Drive, Toronto; and

5. There is currently one assessment roll number for the RSC Property. The assessment roll number for the RSC Property is 19 08 113 020 08550 0000.

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours truly,

TC/jh Encls.

20897596.2

Aird & Berlis llp Rarristprs and Bnliritnrs PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND PAGE 1 OF 4 REGISTRY PREPARED FOR JSadowski OFFICE #66 10090−0874 (LT) ON 2014/12/11 AT 10:16:26 * CERTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND TITLES ACT * SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT *

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: BLOCK 13, PLAN 66M2518; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT OVER PARTS 1 TO 9 ON PLAN 66R20051 AS IN AT51147; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT OVER PART 1 ON PLAN 66R19590 AS IN AT95417; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT OVER PART OF LOT 15, CONCESSION 2, EAST OF YONGE STREET, DESIGNATED AS PARTS 16 & 18 ON PLAN 66R25830 AS IN AT2984074; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT OVER PART OF LOT 15, CONCESSION 2, EAST OF YONGE STREET, DESIGNATED AS PARTS 16, 18 & 19 ON PLAN 66R25830 AS IN AT2984076; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT OVER PART OF LOT 15, CONCESSION 2, EAST OF YONGE STREET, DESIGNATED AS PARTS 1, 22, 23 & 24 ON PLAN 66R25830 UNTIL DEDICATED AS PUBLIC HIGHWAY AS IN AT3750979; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT OVER BLOCKS 2, 4, 5 AND 16 ON PLAN 66M2518 UNTIL DEDICATED AS PUBLIC HIGHWAY AS IN AT3754129; CITY OF TORONTO

PROPERTY REMARKS: PLANNING ACT CONSENT IN DOCUMENT AT2984062.

ESTATE/QUALIFIER: RECENTLY: PIN CREATION DATE: FEE SIMPLE SUBDIVISION FROM 10090−0848 2014/12/09 ABSOLUTE

OWNERS’ NAMES CAPACITY SHARE CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED ROWN CERT/ REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CHKD

** PRINTOUT INCLUDES ALL DOCUMENT TYPES (DELETED INSTRUMENTS NOT INCLUDED) **

NY355956 1961/03/24 AGREEMENT C

AT59581 2002/12/12 NOTICE CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: DELETE UPON REGISTRATION OF APPL. CONTAINING CONSENT OF THE CITY OF TORONTO

AT1274697 2006/10/04 NO SUB AGREEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C

AT1274698 2006/10/04 NO SUB AGREEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1274697

AT1327687 2006/12/07 APL ANNEX REST COV CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C

AT1327688 2006/12/07 APL ANNEX REST COV CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C

AT1327689 2006/12/07 CHARGE $134,692,994 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED C

AT1332175 2006/12/14 CHARGE $50,000,000 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED C

AT1451885 2007/05/23 CHARGE $45,000,000 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED HSBC BANK CANADA C

AT1451905 2007/05/23 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED HSBC BANK CANADA C REMARKS: AT1327689 TO AT1451885

AT1451906 2007/05/23 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED HSBC BANK CANADA C REMARKS: AT1332175 TO AT1451885

NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY. NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL UP.

PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND PAGE 2 OF 4 REGISTRY PREPARED FOR JSadowski OFFICE #66 10090−0874 (LT) ON 2014/12/11 AT 10:16:26 * CERTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND TITLES ACT * SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT *

CERT/ REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CHKD

AT2935974 2012/02/01 NOTICE $2 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C

AT2935979 2012/02/01 NOTICE $1 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C

AT2984063 2012/04/04 APL ANNEX REST COV CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C REMARKS: AFFECTS PART 20 ON PLAN 66R25830

AT2984064 2012/04/04 APL ANNEX REST COV CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C REMARKS: AFFECTS PART 20 ON PLAN 66R25830

AT2984065 2012/04/04 CHARGE $45,000,000 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED HSBC BANK CANADA C REMARKS: AFFECTS PART 20 ON PLAN 66R25830

AT2984066 2012/04/04 CHARGE $134,692,994 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED C REMARKS: AFFECTS PART 20 ON PLAN 66R25830

AT2984067 2012/04/04 CHARGE $50,000,000 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED C REMARKS: AFFECTS PART 20 ON PLAN 66R25830

AT2984477 2012/04/05 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1327689 TO AT2935974

AT2984478 2012/04/05 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1332175 TO AT2935974

AT2984479 2012/04/05 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1327689 TO AT2935979

AT2984480 2012/04/05 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1332175 TO AT2935979

AT2984481 2012/04/05 POSTPONEMENT HSBC BANK CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1451885 TO AT2935974

AT2984482 2012/04/05 POSTPONEMENT HSBC BANK CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1451885 TO AT2935979

AT3320152 2013/06/10 NOTICE $2 CITY OF TORONTO CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C CONCORD TANGO 2 GP LIMITED

AT3320989 2013/06/11 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C

PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND PAGE 3 OF 4 REGISTRY PREPARED FOR JSadowski OFFICE #66 10090−0874 (LT) ON 2014/12/11 AT 10:16:26 * CERTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND TITLES ACT * SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT *

CERT/ REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CHKD

REMARKS: AT1327689 TO AT3320152

AT3320990 2013/06/11 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1332175 TO AT3320152

AT3320991 2013/06/11 POSTPONEMENT HSBC BANK CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1451885 TO AT3320152

AT3320992 2013/06/11 POSTPONEMENT HSBC BANK CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984065 TO AT3320152

AT3320993 2013/06/11 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984066 TO AT3320152

AT3320994 2013/06/11 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984067 TO AT3320152

AT3731853 2014/11/03 CHARGE $35,000,000 CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA C

66M2518 2014/11/27 PLAN SUBDIVISION C

AT3754115 2014/12/01 NO SUB AGREEMENT CITY OF TORONTO CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C

AT3754116 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1327689 TO AT3754115

AT3754117 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1332175 TO AT3754115

AT3754118 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT HSBC BANK CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1451885 TO AT3754115

AT3754119 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984066 TO AT3754115

AT3754120 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984067 TO AT3754115

AT3754121 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT HSBC BANK CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984065 TO AT3754115

PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND PAGE 4 OF 4 REGISTRY PREPARED FOR JSadowski OFFICE #66 10090−0874 (LT) ON 2014/12/11 AT 10:16:26 * CERTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND TITLES ACT * SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT *

CERT/ REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CHKD

AT3754122 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT3731853 TO AT3754115

AT3754140 2014/12/01 APL ANNEX REST COV CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED C

AT3754141 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1327689 TO AT3754140

AT3754142 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1332175 TO AT3754140

AT3754143 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT HSBC BANK CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT1451885 TO AT3754140

AT3754144 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984066 TO AT3754140

AT3754145 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984067 TO AT3754140

AT3754146 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT HSBC BANK CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT2984065 TO AT3754140

AT3754147 2014/12/01 POSTPONEMENT TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA CITY OF TORONTO C REMARKS: AT3731853 TO AT3754140

Receipted as AT1327686 on 2006 12 07 at 11:32

yyyy mm dd Pag 1 of2

Pr ►perties

PIN 10090 - 0789 LT Interest/Estate Fee Simple Descript/on BLOCK 2, PLAN 66M2432, TORONTO (N YORK);., SIT EASE OVER PART 11, 66R19264 AS IN NY567249;.. SIT EASE OVER PART 9,. 66R1 9264 AS IN NY567249,.. TIW ROW OVER PART 25, 66R19264 AS IN NY567188;. TAN EASE OVER PARTS 2 & 6, 66821519 AS IN AT711897;.. Address CITY OF TORONTO

PIN 10090 - 0791 LT Interest/Estate Fee Simple Description BLOCK 4, PLAN 66M2432, TORONTO (N YORK);.. SIT EASE OVER PART 11, 66819264 AS IN NY567249;.. SIT EASE OVER PART 9, 66R19264 AS IN NY567249;.. T/W ROW OVER PART 25, 66R1 9264 AS IN NY567188;.. TAN EASE. OVER PARTS 2 & 6, 66R21519 AS IN AT711897;.. Address CITY OF TORONTO

PIN 10090 - 0792 LT interest/Estate Fee Simple Description BLOCK 5, PLAN 66M2432, TORONTO (N YORK), TJ'W ROW OVER PART 25, 66R19264 AS IN NY567188;,, TAW EASE OVER PARTS 2& 6, 66R21519 AS IN AT711897;., Address CITY OF TORONTO

PIN 10090 - 0790 LT Interest/Estate Fee Simple Description BLOCK 3, PLAN 66M2432, TORONTO (N YORK);., TM' EASE OVER PARTS 2 & 6, 66R21519 AS IN AT711897 ; TJW EASEMENT OVER PART 25, PLAN 66R19264, AS IN NY567188. Address CITY OF TORONTO

PIN 10090 - 0785 LT interest/Estate Fee Simple Description PT LOTS 14 & 15, CONCESSION 2 ; EAST OF YONGE STREET, CITY OF TORONTO (FORMERLY CITY OF NORTH YORK), DESIGNATED AS PARTS 16 TO 24, PLAN 66819264, SAVE & EXCEPT PARTS 1 TO 9, PLAN 66R20051 & PART 1, PLAN 66R1 9590 & BLOCK 7, PLAN 66M2.432 & PART 1, PLAN 66R20359 S/T EASE NY317802 ON PART 17, 65R19264; .. SCI` EASE NY317801 ON PART 19, 68R19264;,. SIT EASE TR67399 ON PART 21, 66R19264; ,,TAN ROW AT51147 OVER PARTS I TO 9 INCL, 66R20051 ; ,. TM ROW A"x96417 OVER PART 1, 66R19590 ; .. TM EASE AT711897 OVER PARTS 2 & 6, 66821 519.5 Address CITY OF TORONTO

Consideration

Consideration $149,692,994.22 Transferor{s,1 II The transferor(s) hereby transfers the land to the transferee(s),

Name CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED Address for Service 2180 Yonge St. P.O. Box 770, Station "K", Toronto, ON M4P 2V8

I, Ken Silver, Senior VP, Real Estate & Construction and I, Huw Thomas, Executive VP, Finance & Administration and CFO, have th authority to bind the corporation. This document is not authorized under Power of Attorney by this party.

Transferee(s) Capacity Share

Name CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED Address for Service 23 Spadina Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5V 3M5

STATEMENT OF THE TRANSFEROR (S): The transferor(s) verifies that to the best of the transferor's knowledge and belief, this transfer does not contravene the Planning Act. STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEROR (S). l have explained the effect of the Planning Act to the transferor(s) and I have made inquiries of the transferor(s) to determine that this transfer does notcontravene that Act and based on the information supplied by the transferor(s), to the best of my knowledge and belief, this transfer does not contravene that Act. I am an Ontario solicitor in good standing. I LRC # 80 Transfer Recefpted as AT1327686 on 2006 12 07 at 1 32 The applicant(s) hereby applies to the Land Registrar, yyyy mm dd Page 2 of 2 STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEREE (5): I have investigated the title to this land and to abutting land where relevant and I am satisfied that the title records reveal no contravention as set out in the Planning Act, and to the best of my knowledge and belief this transfer does not contravene the Planning Act. I act independently of the solicitor for the transferor(s) and i am an Ontario solicitor in good standing,

I By — Signed

Jeffrey Howard Shore 250 Yonge Street Suite 2400 acting for Transferor(s) Signed 2006 12 07 Toronto M5B 2M6 Tel 4169792211 Fax 4169791234

Randy Todd Hooke 181 Bay St., Suite 1800, Box. 754 acting for Transferee(s) Signed 2006 1 07 Toronto M5J .2T9 Tel 4168631500 Fax 4168631515

5ubmittga' By

AIRD & BERLIS LLP 181 Bay St., Suite 1800, Box 754 2006 1207 Toronto M5.J 2T9 Tel 4168631500 Fax 4168631515

Fees/Taxes/Payment

Statutory Registration Fee $60.00 Land Transfer Tax •$2,243,869.91

Total Paid $2,243,929.91

File Number Transferor Client File Number 05-1755 CANADIAN TIRE (SKBOSNC) LAND TRANSFER TAX. STATEMENTS In the matter of the conveyance of 10090 - 0789 BLOCK 2, PLAN 66M2432, TORONTO (N YORK);.. S/T EASE OVER PART 11, 86R19264 AS IN NY567249;.. SIT EASE OVER PART 9, 66R19264 AS IN NY567249;., TIW ROW OVER PART 25, 66819264 AS IN NY567188;, TJW EA OVER PARTS 2 & 6, 66R21519 AS IN AT711897;.. 10090 - 0791 BLOCK 4, PLAN 66M2432, TORONTO (N YORK);.. SIT EASE OVER PART 11, 66819264 AS IN NY567249;.. SIT EASE OVER PART 9, 66R19264 AS. IN NY567249;.. T/W ROW OVER PART 2:5, 66R19264 AS IN NY567188;., T/W EASE OVER PARTS 2 & 6, 88R21519 AS IN AT711897;.. 10090 - 0792 BLOCKS, PLAN 66M2432, TORONTO (N YORK). T1W ROW OVER PART 25, 66819264 AS IN NY567188;.. TI'N EASE OVER PARTS 2 & 6, 66R21519 AS IN A1711897;., 10090 - 0790 BLOCK 3, PLAN 66M2432, TORONTO (N YORK);.. T/W EASE OVER PARTS 2 • 5, 63R21519 AS IN AT711897 ; T7W EASEMENT OVER PART 25, PLAN 66R19264, AS IN NY567188, 10090 - 0785 PT LOTS 14 & 15, CONCESSION 2, EAST OF YONGE STREET, CITY OF TORONTO (FORMERLY CITY OF NORTH YORK), DESIGNATED AS PARTS 1 10 24, PLAN 66R19264,. SAVE & EXCEPT PARTS 1 TO 9, PLAN 66R20051 & PART 1, PLAN 66R19590 & BLOCK 7, PLAN 66M2432 & PART I PLAN 66R20359 ; SIT EASE NY317802 ON PART 17, 66819284 ; .. S/T EASE NY317801 ON PART 19, 66R1 9264;._ SIT EASE TR67399 ON PART 21, • 66R19264 ; _, TIW ROW AT51 147 OVER PARTS 1 TO 9 INCL., 66R20051 ; .. 1/W ROW AT95417 OVER PART 1, 66R19590; T!W EASE AT711897 OVER PARTS 2 & 6, 66R21519,

BY; CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED TO: CONCORD ADEX.INVESTMENTS LIMITEC) %(all PINs)

1, DAVID MCCOMB • Lam I (a) A person in trust for whom the land conveyed in the above-described conveyance Is being conveyed; I...... I (b) A trustee named in the above-described conveyance to whom the land is being conveyed; (c) A transferee named in the above-described conveyance; (d) The authorized agent or solicitor acting in this transaction for described in paragraph(s) U above, (e) The President, Vice-President, Manager, Secretary, Director, or Treasurer authorized to act for CONCORD ADEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED described in paragraph(s) (C) above. L-._J (f) A transferee described in paragraph () and am making these statements on my own behalf and on behalf of who Is my spouse described in paragraph i and as such, I have personal knowledge of the facts herein deposed to.

2. 1 have read and considered the definition of "single family residence" set out in subsection 1(1) of the Act. The land being conveye herein: does not contain a single family :residence or contains more than two single family residences. 3. The total consideration for this transaction is allocated as follows; (a) Monies paid or to be paid in cash 15,000,000.0 (b) Mortgages (1) assumed (show principal and interest to be credited against purchase price) 0.0 (ii) Given Back to Vendor 134,692,994.2 (c) Property transferred In exchange (detail below) 0,0 (d) Fair market value of the land(s) 0,0 (e) Liens, legacies, annuities and maintenance charges to which transfer is subject 0.0 (f) Other valuable consideration subject to land transfer tax (detail below) 0.0 (g) Value of lbnd, building, fixtures and goodwill subject to land transfer tax (total of (a) to (f)) 149,592,994.2 (h) VALUE OF ALL CHATTELS - items of tangible personal property 0.0 (i) Other considerations for transaction not included In (g) or (h) above 0.0 (j) Total consideration 149,692,994.2 'ROPERTY Information Record A. Nature of Instrument: Transfer LEO 80 Registration No. AT1327686 Date: 2006112107 B. Property($): PIN 10090 . 0789 Address Assessment - CITY OF TORONTO Roll No PIN 10090 - 0791 Address Assessment CITY OF TORONTO Roll No PIN 10090 - 0792 Address Assessment - CITY OF TORONTO Roll No PIN 10090 - 0790 Address Assessment - CITY OF TORONTO Roll No PIN 10090 - 0785 Address Assessment CITY OF TORONTO Rolf No LAND TRANSFER TAX STATEMENTS C. Ad1•ess for Service: 23 Spadina Avenue I..:. Toronto, Ontario M5V 3M5

D. (1) Last Conveyance(s); PIN 10090 - 0789 Registration No. NY567249Z

PIN 10090 - 0791 Registration No. NY567249Z PiN 10090-0792 Registration No. null

PIN 10090 - 0790 Registration No. null

• PIN 10090 - 0785 Registration No. TR67399 • (ii) Legal Description for Property Conveyed; Same as in last conveyance? Yes J No [.., Not known E. Tax Statements Prepared By: Randy Todd Hooke 181 Bay St., Suite 1800, Box 754 Toronto M5d 219

AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

Media Location of Area of Area of Potentially Potential Potentially Location of PCA Contaminants of Potential Impacted Environmental Contaminating (on-site or off- Potential Environmental (Groundwater, Concern on Phase Activity site) Concern Concern soil and/or One Property sediment) South and east Other. De-icing On-site EC and SAR Soil portions of the activities Groundwater APEC-1 property.

Entire Property 30. Importation of On-site PHCs, VOCs, Soil Fill Material of Metals, As, Sb, Se, Groundwater APEC-2 unknown Quality B-HWS, Cr (VI), Hg, CN, High pH, Low pH, Contaminants of Concern:

ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury OCs BTEX Cl high pH PHCs Ca, Mg CN low pH SAR

TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY (Refer to Clause 16 (2)(b), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

Other Observations from Description of Year Name of Owner Property Use Aerial Photographs, Fire Property Use Insurance Plans, Etc. Joseph Provost, Agricultural land use Agricultural land use 1802 - 1832 Richard Graham Joseph Steffens, John Agricultural land use Agricultural land use 1832 - 1839 Harp Records indicate property 1839 - 1841 Robert I. Pedgett Agricultural land use Agricultural land use use likely used for 1841 - 1884 Thomas Clarke Agricultural land use Agricultural land use agricultural purposes. No Ellish & Samuel Agricultural land use Agricultural land use 1884 - 1887 buildings are present in Armstrong available aerial photographs. 1887 - 1947 Samuel Armstrong Agricultural land use Agricultural land use 1947 - 1951 Nathan A. Taylor Agricultural land use Agricultural land use Oriole Park Fairway Agricultural land use Agricultural land use 1951 - 1956 Limited Records indicate property use was industrial as a Property is developed warehouse. Available Canadian Tire for industrial purposes records and aerial 1956 - 2006 Industrial Corporation Limited with a large industrial photographs depict the building property with one large building used for distribution purposes. The property is undergoing Property is vacant of redevelopment for 2006 - Concord Adex all structures and Industrial residential purposes. All Present Investments Limited undergoing buildings have been redevelopment demolished.

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model consists of this text and the following drawings:  Drawing 1 – Site Location Plan o Identifies the location of the subject site

 Drawing 2 – Conceptual Site Model o Identifies the Phase One property, the Phase Two property and the study area. Identifies features noted during the background review and site reconnaissance conducted as part of the Phase One ESA.  Drawing 3 – Areas of Potential Environmental Concern o Identifies potentially contaminating activities on the Phase Two property and within the study area and indicates areas of potential environmental concern on the Phase Two property associated with potentially contaminating activities identified in the Phase One ESA.

 Drawing 4 – Borehole Location Plan o Identifies the soil and groundwater testing locations on the property. Identifies location of cross-sections.  Drawing 5 –EC & SAR Impacts o Identifies locations and depths of previously identified EC and SAR soil impacts. o Identifies the estimated extent of EC and SAR impacted soil.  Drawing 6 –Groundwater Flow o Identifies the groundwater elevations encountered on the property in the upper groundwater unit and the groundwater flow direction of the upper groundwater unit.  Drawing 7 – Cross-Section A-Aˈ o Shows the stratigraphy encountered during the Phase Two ESA and previous investigations. o Depicts sampling locations on the property that exceeded the MOE Table 3 RPI Standards.

 Drawing 8 – Cross-Section B-Bˈ o Shows the stratigraphy encountered during the Phase Two ESA and previous investigations. o Depicts sampling locations on the property that exceeded the MOE Table 3 RPI Standards.  Drawing 9 – Cross-Section A-Aˈ with Remedial Excavation o Shows the stratigraphy and water levels encountered during the Phase Two ESA. o Depicts extents of remedial excavation.  Drawing 10 – Cross-Section B-Bˈ with Remedial Excavation o Shows the stratigraphy and water levels encountered during the Phase Two ESA. o Depicts extents of remedial excavation.  Drawing 11 – Confirmatory Sample Location Plan o Summarizes the confirmatory sampling locations after remedial activities had occurred. o Identifies no utilities present in the area of excavation. o All final confirmatory samples submitted for analysis had concentrations of the parameters tested below the applicable MOE Table 3 RPI property use Standards.

 Drawing 12 – Remedial Wall Profile with Confirmatory Sample Locations o Summarizes the confirmatory sampling locations after remedial activities had occurred. o Identifies no utilities present in the area of excavation. o All confirmatory samples submitted for analysis had concentrations of the parameters tested below the applicable MOE Table 3 RPI property use Standards. The area under assessment is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land with an area of 1.3 hectares (3.2 acres) located at 1001 Sheppard Avenue East in the City of Toronto, Ontario. The RSC property (herein referred to as the subject site) is located approximately 100 m southwest of the intersection of Esther Shiner Boulevard and Provost Drive and approximately 350 m south of the intersection of Provost Drive and Sheppard Avenue East in the City of Toronto, Ontario. Historically, the entire property with the address 1001 Sheppard Avenue East operated as a Canadian Tire Distribution Center and Gas Bar. A Phase One ESA was conducted for the entire property, with the exception of the former Gas Bar location. An RSC (RSC#53519) was filed by SLR Consulting Limited for the former Gas Bar portion of the property in July, 2009. The RSC property is a portion of the Phase One Property as depicted on Drawing 2. Based on the findings of the Phase One ESA completed by SPL, the property was historically utilized for industrial purposes. The 1939 aerial photograph indicated that the Phase One property and the majority of the surrounding properties were utilized for agricultural purposes. The 1954 aerial photograph depicts the Phase One property in an area which has undergone moderate development. South of the Phase One property, Highway 401 appears to be under construction. North, east and west of the Phase One property, the land which was previously agricultural, now appears to be developed with a number of subdivisions, buildings and roadways. On the Phase One property, one structure appears to be present. The Canadian Tire distribution centre building is visible on the 1962 aerial photograph. Available Fire Insurance Plans depict the RSC property as constructed with buildings mainly utilized for various industrial purposes. The Fire Insurance Plans depict the surrounding properties as developed for residential as well as various commercial purposes. Potentially contaminating activities that have occurred on the Phase One property include: gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks, de-icing activities, battery acid recycling, truck maintenance, transformer use and the importation of fill material of unknown quality. In 2009 SPL completed a Phase Two ESA for the entire Phase One property. The RSC property is a relatively small portion of the Phase One property. Potentially contaminating activities that have occurred on the RSC property are limited to importation of fill material of unknown quality, and the use of de-icing agents on paved surfaces. The grade at the property was changed and fill material is a PCA that relates to an APEC on the entire RSC property. As former paved roadways were located on the property, de-icing activities on the RSC property in the south and eastern portions are considered to be APECs. Below is a summary of the identified PCAs on the RSC property and within the RSC property study area: On the RSC Property  PCA 30. Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality – based on previous investigations, depth of fill material ranged from 1.5 m on the west portion of the RSC property to 10.7 m on the east side of the RSC property (APEC-1).

 Other. Use of de-icing agents on paved surfaces – a paved access way existed on the south and east portions of the RSC property. Impacts related to de-icing activities were identified in these areas during previous investigations (APEC-2). Within the RSC property Study Area

 West of the Phase One Property

o PCA 6. Battery Manufacturing, Recycling and Bulk Storage – former lead acid battery oil/water separator located approximately 125 m west of the RSC property. The area was investigated in 2007, remediation completed and confirmatory samples indicated that the impacts had been removed. SPL confirmed the absence of lead impacts at this location in 2009. Therefore, based on proximity of the PCA to the RSC property and the results of previous investigations, not considered a PCA resulting in an APEC on the RSC property. o PCA 28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks – two former USTs (UST 1 and UST 2) located greater than 100 m west of the RSC property. The USTs were removed in 1992. The area was investigated in 2007 with no impacts identified. SPL confirmed the absence of PHCs and VOCs impacts at this location in 2009. Therefore, based on proximity of the PCA to the RSC property and the results of previous investigations, not considered a PCA resulting in an APEC on the RSC property.

 Northwest of the Phase One Property o PCA 28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks – one former diesel AST (Fire Pump No. 1) and one former UST (UST 3) located greater than 300 m northwest of the RSC property. The AST was removed in 2007 and the UST was removed in 2009. A RSC was acknowledged (#53519) for the former gas bar in 2009. SPL confirmed the absence of PHCs impacts at these locations in 2009 and 2013. Therefore, based on proximity of the PCA to the RSC property and the results of previous investigations, not considered a PCA resulting in an APEC on the RSC property. o PCA 28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks – one former Bunker C UST (UST 6) located 275 m northwest of the RSC property. The UST was removed in 2007. SPL confirmed the absence of PHCs impacts at this location in 2009 and 2013. Therefore, based on proximity of the PCA to the RSC property and the results of previous investigations, not considered a PCA resulting in an APEC on the RSC property. o PCA 28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks – two former USTs (UST 4 and UST 5) located 100 m northwest of the RSC property. The USTs were removed in 1992. The area was investigated in 2007 with no impacts identified. SPL confirmed the absence of PHCs impacts at this location in 2009 and 2013. Therefore, based on proximity of the PCA to the RSC property and the results of previous investigations, not considered a PCA resulting in an APEC on the RSC property. o 52. Storage, maintenance, fueling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems – former truck repair interceptor and former sanitary pit located greater than 200 m northwest of the Phase One Property. No evidence of impacts was reported in 2007. SPL confirmed the absence of PHCs impacts at this location in 2009. Therefore, based on proximity of the PCA to the RSC property and the results of previous investigations, not considered a PCA resulting in an APEC on the RSC property. o 55. Transformer Manufacturing, Processing and Use – two transformers were located 260 m northwest of the Phase One Property. The transformers were removed in 2007. No evidence of PCB impacts was reported in 2007. Therefore, based on proximity of the PCA to the RSC property and the results of previous investigations, not considered a PCA resulting in an APEC on the RSC property. Previous reports have documented the investigations of the above-mentioned potentially contaminating activities. Based on the previous investigations, the following APECs have been determined to exist as a result of the identified potentially contaminating activities:

Location of Area of Area of Potential Potentially Contaminant of Media Potential Location of PCA Environmental Contaminating Potential Potentially Environmental (on-site or off-site) Concern on the Activities1 Concern Impacted Concern Phase One Property

South and east Other. Use of de- Soil APEC-1 portions of the icing agents on On-Site EC, SAR Groundwater property paved surfaces

30. Importation of Metals and Soil APEC-2 Entire property Fill Material of On-site inorganics, PHC, Groundwater Unknown Quality VOC

Contaminants of potential concern associated with the identified APECs include: metals, EC, SAR, PHCs and VOCs. The findings of the Phase Two ESA indicate that the south and east portions of the RSC property were covered by an asphalt access way. The east portion of the RSC property sloped steeply down to the east with an elevation change of approximately 13 m. The stratigraphy on the Phase Two property consisted of the following: Fill Material: Fill material consisting of clayey silt to sandy silt, with some gravel, occasional cobble, and trace organic material extending to depths varying from 1.5 to 10.7mbgs. The deeper fill material was encountered on the east side of the property. Silt & Clay: Below the fill material in the boreholes, native soil consisting of silty sand to silty clay was encountered to the maximum depth investigated of 23m. Bedrock: Bedrock was not encountered on the Phase Two Property. Depth to bedrock is expected to be approximately 60m. Based on the Ontario Base Map, ground surface elevation on the subject site ranged from 153.5 to 156.3 masl over the majority of the subject site. A steep slope from west to east was present down to approximately 142.7 masl at the east property boundary. Surficial geology maps for the area (OGS Earth website published by the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry) show surficial soils on the subject site as consisting predominantly of silt to silty clay matrix, high in matrix carbonate content and clast poor, deposited during the Pleistocene epoch. The bedrock geology maps (OGS Earth website, published by the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry) show bedrock in the area of the RSC Property is the Georgian Bay Formation, generally consisting of shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone. The depth to bedrock on the RSC property is approximately 50 - 60 mbgs. The site is neither an environmentally sensitive area nor is it located within an area of natural and scientific interest. During the Phase Two study, soil samples were collected and analyzed for pH. The results show that pH is within the acceptable range for the application of the MOE Table 3 Standards. The site is not a shallow soil property as defined in Section 43.1 of the regulation. The subject site does not include all or part of a water body, is not adjacent to a water body and does not include land that is within 30 m of a water body. The surficial aquifer was investigated, which was encountered approximately 12 m below ground surface. Groundwater levels were taken on November 3, 2011 and found to range between 11.64 and 13.84 m below ground surface (mbgs). Based on the groundwater levels observed during this investigation and topography of the area, the groundwater flow direction is expected to be in a north-easterly direction. The horizontal hydraulic gradient calculated based on the groundwater levels measured during the investigation is 0.022. Since only the surficial aquifer was investigated, vertical hydraulic gradient was not calculated. Previous investigations identified and delineated EC and SAR impacts on the subject site. The impacts were located along the south and east property boundaries, beneath the former paved access ways. Subsurface utilities associated with the former warehouse building may have been present prior to demolition in 2007. Previous reports prepared for the RSC property prior to demolition in 2007 did not identify the locations of underground services. Since the portion of the building that was present on the RSC property was used as a warehouse, subsurface utilities are expected to have been minimal. Any subsurface utilities would likely have been relatively shallow (less than 2 m) and in the area of the former building. Since Highway 401 is located south of the former building the property sloped steeply away from the former building to the east, subsurface utilities are not expected to have been located in these areas (i.e. the areas of identified impacts). No subsurface utilities were identified or encountered during bulk excavation in 2014. Given the types of exceedances encountered (EC and SAR) the migration of these contaminants along utility corridors is unlikely as the depth to groundwater was below the depth of the exceedances. Therefore, subsurface utilities are not expected to have influenced the distribution of contaminants on the RSC property. The Phase Two investigation consisted of soil and groundwater sampling on the subject site. All five boreholes were converted to monitoring wells for water level monitoring and the collection of groundwater samples. Soil samples were collected for the analyses of metals, VOCs, and PHCs. Groundwater samples were collected and analysed for metals and inorganics parameters, VOCs and PHCs. Soil and groundwater analyses on the property were compared to the Table 3 Standards for residential/parkland/institutional land use in a non-potable groundwater condition with coarse-grained soils from the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) document “Soil, Ground Water and Sediments Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” (2011). Chemical analyses were conducted by AGAT Laboratories. AGAT is a member of the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA) and meets the requirement of Section 47 of O.Reg. 153/04 certifying that the analytical laboratory be accredited in accordance with the International Standards ISO/IEC 17025 and with standards developed by the Standards Council of Canada. A review of the chemical testing results indicated that all soil and groundwater samples met the MOE Table 3 RPI Standards for the parameters analysed with the exception of EC and SAR. These exceedances of EC and SAR on the property can be attributed to the de-icing activities conducted on the property. The Canadian Tire Distribution Centre was located on the northwest portion of the subject site. The east and south portions of the subject site were formerly a paved access way. No underground services were identified on the subject site. The SAR and EC impacts were identified on the subject site to a maximum depth of 10m below grade. Since the groundwater levels encountered during the Phase Two ESA were generally below the zone of impacted soils, it is unlikely that groundwater would act as a migration pathway for contaminants. It is unlikely that groundwater fluctuations due to meteorological or climatic conditions would affect the migration of contaminants on the property since groundwater was encountered approximately 3m below the identified impacted soil zone and all groundwater samples met the applicable Standards. Bulk excavation of the subject site began in August 2014. On September 9, 2014 four confirmatory soil samples were collected from surface soil that is to remain along the south property boundary (the only remaining wall on the property, as excavation extended beyond the property limits in all other directions). The samples were analysed for metals and inorganics, VOCs and PHCs parameters. All samples met the MOE Table 3 RPI standards for the parameters analysed. Further confirmatory samples were collected on October 10, 2014 from elevation ranging from 149 to 148 masl on the northwest portion of the subject site. As of December 2, 2014 bulk excavation has been conducted to an elevation of approximately 142masl across the majority of the subject site. Three confirmatory soil samples were collected on December 2, 2014 from the base of the excavation on the east central portion of the property. Five confirmatory samples were collected on December 3, 2014 from the walls and the underlying floor of the excavation. Three of the soil samples were analysed for metals and inorganics, VOCs and PHCs parameters and the remaining samples were analysed for SAR and EC. All soil samples met the MOE Table 3 RPI standards for the parameters analysed with the exception of EC at one sample location from an elevation of 145.5masl. On January 14, 2015 one soil sample was collected from an elevation of 142masl at the location of the elevated EC result. The sample met the MOE Table 3 RPI Standards for EC and SAR. A review of the chemical analysis for the confirmatory samples indicated that all remaining soils met the MOE Table 3 RPI Standards for residential/parkland/institutional property uses. Approximately 35,000 m3 of soil that exceeded the MOE Table 3 RPI Standards for EC and/or SAR was removed from the subject site prior to the retrieval of confirmatory soil samples. The proposed development is a residential development consisting of residential buildings and associated underground parking encompassing a majority of the RSC property. Exposure to impacted soils is expected to be minimal as the impacted soil was removed from the property by excavation equipment as part of the remedial activities. The primary exposure pathway for the soil impacts would be dermal contact and inhalation. As no significant ecological habitat is present on-site it is expected that the risk to ecological receptors is minimal. Workers may have come into contact with soil during construction, but this is expected to be minimal as heavy equipment was used to remove soil from the property. All groundwater samples analysed met the MOE Table 3 Standards. Since impacted soil has been removed from the subject site and no groundwater impacts were identified, it is not expected that the impacts observed present a migration risk. SAR and EC were the sole parameters identified that exceeded the MOE Table 3 Standards at the subject site. SAR and EC impacts have been attributed to de-icing activities on the paved surface of the south and east portions of the subject site. SAR and EC do not present a vapour intrusion concern. Furthermore, the identified impacted soil was removed from the subject site. Therefore, based on the Phase Two ESA, no risk for vapour intrusion into historical or future buildings was identified on the subject site. In conclusion, after remediation, all soil and groundwater samples submitted for analysis as part of this investigation met the MOE Table 3 RPI Standards.

Phase Two Property

 Source: Google Maps

SITE LOCATION Scale: PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE Prepared By: See scale bar ASSESSMENT KC 180 Shearson Crescent, Units 1 & 2 Block 13, Concord Park Place, Cambridge, ON N1T 1P4 Date: Reviewed By: January 2015 Toronto, Ontario DL T: 519-740-0065 F: 519-740-0045 Prepared For: Concord Adex Drawing No. Project: 662-1004 Investments 1

BH09-59 BH09-59 Soil Sample BH201 SS2 BH201 SS4 BH201 SS6 BH201 SS9 BH09-65 BH09-65 BH09-64 BH09-64 BH09-59 S1 BH09-59 S3 BH09-65 S1 BH09-65 S2 BH09-64 S1 BH09-64 S3 Soil Sample S2A S2B Depth 0.8-1.4 2.3-2.8 4.6-5.1 9.2-9.7 Soil Sample S3A S3B Soil Sample S2A S2B 0.0 – 1.2 1.2 – 2.0 2.0 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.7 Depth 0.0 – 1.2 1.2 – 1.8 1.8 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.7 Parameter Depth 0.0 – 1.2 1.2 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.1 3.1 – 3.7 Depth Parameter EC 0.365 0.305 0.311 0.258 Parameter Parameter EC 0.31 0.41 0.37 0.21 SAR 1.28 0.158 0.377 0.155 EC 0.47 0.48 0.33 0.3 EC 0.89 1.8 1.7 1.5 0.46 0.18 0.18 0.23 SAR SAR 0.75 0.46 0.19 0.19 SAR 43 57 49 41

BH13-2 BH13-2 Soil Sample SS2 SS4 Depth 0.75-1.35 2.25-2.85 Parameter EC 0.243 0.221 BH09-60 BH09-60 BH09-60 S1 BH09-60 S2 SAR 1.08 0.307 Soil Sample S3A S3B Soil Sample BH12 SS1 Depth 0.0 – 0.6 1.2 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.1 3.1 – 3.7 Depth 0-0.6 BH09-68 BH09-68 Parameter Parameter BH09-68 S1 BH09-68 S2 BH09-68 S3 Soil Sample S4A S4B EC 0.36 0.25 0.17 0.15 EC 0.244 Depth 0.0 – 1.2 1.2 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.7 3.7 – 4.3 4.3 – 4.9 SAR 0.39 0.24 0.24 0.27 SAR 0.704 Parameter EC 1.3 1.4 1 0.51 0.31 Soil Sample BH203 SS2 BH203 SS4 BH203 SS6 0.51 0.14 0.2 Depth 0.8-1.4 2.3-2.8 4.6-5.1 SAR 35 5.4 Parameter EC 0.432 0.277 0.185 Soil Sample TP 3 TP 3 SAR 0.446 0.234 0.148 Depth 1.5 3.7 Parameter QA/QC 1 EC 0.57 0.09 (Field BH204 SS2 Duplicate BH204 SS4 BH204 SS5 BH204 SS6 SAR 5.5 0.54 of BH204 Soil Sample SS2) BH09-66 BH09-66 BH09-66 S1 BH09-66 S2 Depth 0.8-1.4 0.8-1.4 2.3-2.8 3.1-3.6 4.6-5.1 Soil Sample S3A S3B Parameter Depth 0.0 – 1.2 1.2 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.4 3.4 – 3.7 EC 0.256 0.277 0.315 0.286 0.330 Parameter SAR 1.29 1.45 1.33 1.55 1.54 EC 0.2 0.85 0.68 0.65 SAR 1.6 2.1 0.81 0.85 BH13-1 BH13-1 Soil Sample SS2 SS4 Soil Sample TP 6 TP 6 Depth 0.75-1.35 2.25-2.85 Depth 0.8 2.4 Parameter Parameter EC 0.206 0.606 EC 0.11 1.3 SAR 2.03 1.42 SAR 2.1 13.8

Soil Sample BH202 SS4 BH202 SS6 BH202 SS7 BH202 SS8 Soil Sample TP 4 Soil Sample TP 1 Soil Sample TP 2 Depth 2.3-2.8 4.6-5.1 6.2-6.7 7.7-8.2 Depth 3.7 Depth 0.3 Depth 1.1 Parameter Parameter Parameter Parameter EC 0.260 0.394 0.480 0.516 EC 0.18 EC 0.09 EC 0.17 SAR 2.59 2.37 1.29 0.537 SAR 1.8 SAR 0.14 SAR 1.5

Soil Sample BH41 SS1 BH41 SS3 BH41 SS5 BH09-56 BH09-56 S1 BH09-56 S2 BH09-56 S3 Depth 0-0.6 1.2-1.8 2.4-3.1 Soil Sample S1B Parameter Depth 0.0 – 0.6 0.6 – 1.2 1.2 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.7 QA/QC 2 EC 0.375 4.95 2.6 Parameter (Field SAR 7.11 65.8 27.8 EC 0.17 0.63 0.64 0.69 BH205 SS3 BH205 SS5 BH205 SS6 BH205 SS7 Duplicate of BH205 SAR 0.87 17 19 14 Soil Sample SS7) Depth 1.5-2.0 3.1-3.6 4.6-5.1 6.2-6.7 6.2-6.7 Parameter EC 0.393 0.477 0.441 0.300 0.288 SAR 3.50 4.99 1.46 0.545 0.431

MOE Table 3 RPI Parameter Standard Electrical Conductivity (EC) 0.7 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) 5

Soil Sample Ph 1 - 01 BH09-65 BH09-65 BH09-65 S1 BH09-65 S2 Date 10/10/2014 Soil Sample S3A S3B Depth 0.0 – 1.2 1.2 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.1 3.1 – 3.7 Parameter 5922726 Parameter EC 0.444 EC 0.47 0.48 0.33 0.3 SAR 0.75 0.46 0.19 0.19 SAR 1.62

BH09-64 BH09-64 BH09-64 S1 BH09-64 S3 Soil Sample S2A S2B Depth 0.0 – 1.2 1.2 – 2.0 2.0 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.7 Parameter EC 0.89 1.8 1.7 1.5 SAR 43 57 49 41

Soil Sample GS - 141202 - SC1 Date 12/02/2014 Parameter 6150076 EC 0.185 SAR 0.115

Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 3 Date 12/03/2014 Parameter 6150146 EC 0.283 Soil Sample BH202 SS4 BH202 SS6 BH202 SS7 BH202 SS8 SAR 0.213 Depth 2.3-2.8 4.6-5.1 6.2-6.7 7.7-8.2 Parameter EC 0.260 0.394 0.480 0.516 SAR 2.59 2.37 1.29 0.537 Soil Sample GS - 141202 - SC3 Date 12/02/2014 Parameter 6150078 EC 0.154 SAR 0.086 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 05

Date 10/10/2014 QA/QC 1 5922757 (Field Soil Sample Ph 1 - 02 Parameter BH204 SS2 Duplicate BH204 SS4 BH204 SS5 BH204 SS6 Soil Sample BH201 SS2 BH201 SS4 BH201 SS6 BH201 SS9 EC 0.182 of BH204 Date 10/10/2014 Depth 0.8-1.4 2.3-2.8 4.6-5.1 9.2-9.7 Soil Sample SS2) Parameter SAR 0.119 Depth 0.8-1.4 0.8-1.4 2.3-2.8 3.1-3.6 4.6-5.1 Parameter 5922730 EC 0.365 0.305 0.311 0.258 Parameter EC 0.523 SAR 1.28 0.158 0.377 0.155 EC 0.256 0.277 0.315 0.286 0.330 SAR 1.29 1.45 1.33 1.55 1.54 SAR 1.83

MOE Table 3 RPI Parameter Standard Electrical Conductivity (EC) 0.7 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) 5 BH09-60 BH09-60 BH09-60 S1 BH09-60 S2 Soil Sample S3A S3B Soil Sample BH203 SS2 BH203 SS4 BH203 SS6 Soil Sample BH41 SS1 BH41 SS3 BH41 SS5 Depth 0.0 – 0.6 1.2 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.1 3.1 – 3.7 Depth 0.8-1.4 2.3-2.8 4.6-5.1 Depth 0-0.6 1.2-1.8 2.4-3.1 Parameter Parameter Parameter EC 0.36 0.25 0.17 0.15 EC 0.432 0.277 0.185 EC 0.375 4.95 2.6 SAR 0.39 0.24 0.24 0.27 SAR 0.446 0.234 0.148 SAR 7.11 65.8 27.8

Soil Sample GH5 Date 09/09/2014 Parameter 5785664 EC 0.310 SAR 2.54

QA/QC 2 (Field BH205 SS3 BH205 SS5 BH205 SS6 BH205 SS7 Duplicate of BH205 Soil Sample SS7) Depth 1.5-2.0 3.1-3.6 4.6-5.1 6.2-6.7 6.2-6.7 Parameter EC 0.393 0.477 0.441 0.300 0.288 SAR 3.50 4.99 1.46 0.545 0.431

Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 5 Date 12/03/2014 Parameter 6150159 EC 0.405 SAR 1.21

Soil Sample Ph 1 - 02 Date 10/10/2014 Parameter 5922730 EC 0.523 SAR 1.83

QA/QC 1 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 04 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 05 (Field BH204 SS2 Duplicate BH204 SS4 BH204 SS5 BH204 SS6 Date 10/10/2014 Date 10/10/2014 of BH204 Soil Sample SS2) Parameter 5922749 5922757 Parameter Depth 0.8-1.4 0.8-1.4 2.3-2.8 3.1-3.6 4.6-5.1 EC 0.132 EC 0.182 Parameter SAR 0.090 SAR 0.119 EC 0.256 0.277 0.315 0.286 0.330 SAR 1.29 1.45 1.33 1.55 1.54

MOE Table 3 RPI Parameter Standard Electrical Conductivity (EC) 0.7 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) 5 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 01 Date 10/10/2014 Parameter 5922726 EC 0.444 SAR 1.62

Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 3 Date 12/03/2014 Parameter 6150146 EC 0.283 SAR 0.213

Soil Sample Ph 1 - 05 Date 10/10/2014 Parameter 5922757 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 02 Soil Sample GS - 141202 - SC3 Soil Sample GS - 141202 - SC1 EC 0.182 Date 10/10/2014 Date 12/02/2014 Date 12/02/2014 SAR 0.119 Parameter 5922730 Parameter 6150078 Parameter 6150076 EC 0.523 EC 0.154 EC 0.185 SAR 1.83 SAR 0.086 SAR 0.115

MOE Table 3 RPI Parameter Standard Electrical Conductivity (EC) 0.7 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) 5 Soil Sample GH5 Date 09/09/2014 Parameter 5785664 EC 0.310 SAR 2.54

Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 5 Date 12/03/2014 Parameter 6150159 EC 0.405 SAR 1.21

Soil Sample Ph 1 - 04 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 05 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 02 Date 10/10/2014 Date 10/10/2014 Date 10/10/2014 Parameter 5922749 Parameter 5922757 Parameter 5922730 EC 0.132 EC 0.182 EC 0.523 SAR 0.090 SAR 0.119 SAR 1.83

MOE Table 3 RPI Parameter Standard Electrical Conductivity (EC) 0.7 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) 5 Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 3 Soil Sample GS - 141202 - SC3 Date 12/03/2014 Date 12/02/2014 Parameter 6150146 Parameter 6150078 EC 0.283 Soil Sample GS - 141202 - SC2 EC 0.154 SAR 0.213 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 03 Date 12/02/2014 SAR 0.086 Date 10/10/2014 Parameter 6150077 Parameter 5922734 EC 0.177 Soil Sample GS - 141202 - SC1 EC 0.222 SAR 0.088 Date 12/02/2014 SAR 0.390 Parameter 6150076 EC 0.185 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 04 SAR 0.115 Date 10/10/2014 Parameter 5922749 Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 2 EC 0.132 Date 12/03/2014 0.090 SAR Parameter 6150141 EC 0.282 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 05 SAR 0.336 Date 10/10/2014 Parameter 5922757 Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 1 (145.5m) EC 0.182 Date 12/03/2014 SAR 0.119 Parameter 6150135 EC 0.887 SAR 2.69 Soil Sample Ph 1 - 01 Soil Sample GS150114-01 (142.0m) Date 10/10/2014 Date 01/14/2015 Parameter 5922726 Parameter 6248595 EC 0.444 EC 0.319 SAR 1.62 SAR 1.39

Soil Sample Ph 1 - 02 Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 4 Date 10/10/2014 Date 12/03/2014 Parameter 5922730 Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 5 Parameter 6150152 EC 0.523 Date 12/03/2014 EC 0.677 SAR 1.83 Parameter 6150159 SAR 1.23 EC 0.405 SAR 1.21 Soil Sample GH1 Date 09/09/2014 Soil Sample GH2 Soil Sample GH4 Soil Sample GH5 Parameter 5785658 Date 09/09/2014 Date 09/09/2014 Date 09/09/2014 EC 0.116 Parameter 5785660 Parameter 5785662 Parameter 5785664 SAR 0.437 EC 0.156 EC 0.157 EC 0.310 SAR 0.620 SAR 0.347 SAR 2.54

MOE Table 3 RPI Parameter Standard Electrical Conductivity (EC) 0.7 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) 5 Soil Sample GH5 Soil Sample GH4 Soil Sample GH2 Soil Sample GH1 Depth 09/09/2014 Depth 09/09/2014 Depth 09/09/2014 Depth 09/09/2014 Parameter 5785664 Parameter 5785662 Parameter 5785660 Parameter 5785658 EC 0.310 EC 0.157 EC 0.156 EC 0.116 SAR 2.54 SAR 0.347 SAR 0.620 SAR 0.437

Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 4 Soil Sample GS - 141203 - 5 Depth 12/03/2014 Depth 12/03/2014 Parameter 6150152 Parameter 6150159 EC 0.677 EC 0.405 SAR 1.23 SAR 1.21

MOE Table 3 RPI Parameter Standard Electrical Conductivity (EC) 0.7 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) 5

Human Receptors and Exposure Pathways

Release Media Exposure Pathways Receptor Mechanism (Upper fill soils)

Dermal Long Term Worker/occupant Electrical /(Adult) De -icing Conductivity Inhalation agents and Sodium Property Visitor Adsorption Ratio

Ingestion Construction Worker

Notes:

Exposure pathway is closed by removing contaminated soil from the subject site (Impacts have been remediated).

Ecological Receptors and Exposure Pathways

Release Media Exposure Pathways Receptor Mechanism (Upper fill soils)

Terrestrial Vegetation De-icing Electrical agents Direct Contact Conductivity and Sodium Soil Invertebrates Adsorption Ratio Indirect Contact

Mammals & Birds

Notes:

Exposure pathway is closed by removing contaminated soil from the subject site (Impacts have been remediated).