E2F4 at the Promoters of Target Genes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

E2F4 at the Promoters of Target Genes Oncogene (2012) 31, 4207–4220 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/12 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE p27Kip1 represses transcription by direct interaction with p130/E2F4 at the promoters of target genes R Pippa1, L Espinosa2, G Gundem3, R Garcı´a-Escudero4, A Dominguez1, S Orlando1, E Gallastegui1, C Saiz4, A Besson5, MJ Pujol1,NLo´pez-Bigas3, JM Paramio4, A Bigas2 and O Bachs1 1Department of Cell Biology, Immunology and Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; 2Institut Municipal d’Investigacions Me`diques-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; 3Department of Experimental and Health Science, Research Unit on Biomedical Informatics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain; 4Molecular Oncology Unit, Division of Biomedicine, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain and 5INSERM–UMR1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Toulouse, France The cyclin-cdk (cyclin-dependent kinase) inhibitor p27Kip1 Introduction (p27) has a crucial negative role on cell cycle progression. In addition to its classical role as a cyclin-cdk inhibitor, it The protein p27Kip1 (p27) is a cell cycle regulator whose also performs cyclin-cdk-independent functions as the main known function is the regulation of cyclin-depen- regulation of cytoskeleton rearrangements and cell dent kinase (cdk) activities (Sherr and Roberts, 1999). The motility. p27 deficiency has been associated with tumor importance of p27 as a cell cycle regulator in vivo was aggressiveness and poor clinical outcome, although the revealed by the generation of p27À/À mice that display an mechanisms underlying this participation still remain increase in body size and multiple organ hyperplasia (Fero elusive. We report here a new cellular function of p27 as et al., 1996; Nakayama et al., 1996) (Kiyokawa et al., a transcriptional regulator in association with p130/E2F4 1996). This protein was originally considered as a complexes that could be relevant for tumorigenesis. We ‘universal’ inhibitor of cyclin-cdk complexes whose observed that p27 associates with specific promoters of activity was exerted by the N-terminal half of the molecule genes involved in important cellular functions as proces- (Russo et al., 1996). However, recent reports revealed a sing and splicing of RNA, mitochondrial organization and dual role of p27, behaving as an inhibitor or and activator respiration, translation and cell cycle. On these promoters of cyclin D-cdk4/6 and cyclin E-cdk2 on depending p27 co-localizes with p130, E2F4 and co-repressors as of specific tyrosine phosphorylation (Chu et al., 2007; histone deacetylases (HDACs) and mSIN3A. p27 co- Grimmler et al., 2007; Blain, 2008; James et al., 2008). immunoprecipitates with these proteins and by affinity p27 deficiency is associated with tumorigenesis. Re- chromatography, we demonstrated a direct interaction of duced p27 levels are frequently observed in human cancers p27 with p130 and E2F4 through its carboxyl-half. We in association with tumor aggressiveness and poor clinical have also shown that p130 recruits p27 on the promoters, outcome (Slingerland and Pagano, 2000). In most of the and there p27 is needed for the subsequent recruitment of cases, low levels of p27 are the consequence of an HDACs and mSIN3A. Expression microarrays and increased protein degradation (Frescas and Pagano, luciferase assays revealed that p27 behaves as transcrip- 2008). In some tumors, cytoplasmic localization of p27 tional repressor of these p27-target genes (p27-TGs). is also associated with increased motility, aggressiveness Finally, in human tumors, we established a correlation and poor prognosis (Viglietto et al., 2002). with overexpression of p27-TGs and poor survival. Thus, Quiescent cells contain high levels of p27 mostly this new function of p27 as a transcriptional repressor located in the nucleus. After mitogenic stimulation, it could have a role in the major aggressiveness of tumors translocates to the cytoplasm where it is degraded via with low levels of p27. ubiquitin–proteasome (Shirane et al., 1999). In the Oncogene (2012) 31, 4207–4220; doi:10.1038/onc.2011.582; cytoplasm, p27 performs several cdk-independent activ- published online 19 December 2011 ities. It participates in both actin cytoskeleton rearran- gement and cell motility through the modulation of Keywords: p27; p130; E2F4; transcription RhoA activity, a role that relies in the C-terminal half of p27 (McAllister et al., 2003; Besson et al., 2004). p27 also interacts with stathmin, a microtubule-associated protein, thus regulating cell morphology and motility Correspondence: Professor O Bachs, Department of Cell Biology, (Baldassarre et al., 2005). These regulatory roles of p27 Immunology and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of on cell migration have been associated with the cdk- Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biome` diques August Pi i Sunyer independent oncogenic functions of cytoplasmic p27 (IDIBAPS), Casanova 143, 08036-Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] (Besson et al., 2008). Received 15 August 2011; revised 29 October 2011; accepted 11 It is assumed that the main function of nuclear p27 November 2011; published online 19 December 2011 during early G1 is to prevent premature entry into S Transcriptional regulatory role of p27Kip1 R Pippa et al 4208 phase by maintaining cyclin E/cdk2 complexes inactive TRANSFAC database, we found that target sequences (Chu et al., 2008). However, whether nuclear p27 in of ETS1, E2F4 and GABP were significantly enriched in quiescent cells solely acts as a CDK inhibitor or may the promoters of these genes (Figure 2a). We subse- fulfill other nuclear functions remains unclear. It has quently analyzed whether p27-TGs were also targeted been postulated that p27 may participate in the by these three mentioned TFs (Hollenhorst et al., 2007; regulation of transcription independently of cyclin-cdk Lopez-Bigas et al., 2008). Results revealed that p27 regulation. It has been shown that the interaction of p27 shared a significant number of target genes with these with neurogenin-2 leads to the differentiation of neural TFs and additionally also with ELF1 and RBP2 progenitors in the cortex. Specifically, p27 stabilizes (Figure 2b and web Supplementary analysis S1). neurogenin-2 by a mechanism that depends on the To analyze the putative interaction of p27 with E2F4, integrity of its N-terminal half but does not require we performed immunoprecipitation (IP) experiments interactions with cyclins and cdks (Nguyen et al., 2006). with anti-p27 and observed that E2F4 co-immunopre- Moreover, the overexpression of p27 in C2C12 cells cipitated with p27 (Figure 2c). This interaction was induces myogenic differentiation, whereas elimination of confirmed by IPs with anti-E2F4 in mice embryo p27 prevents differentiation (Munoz-Alonso et al., fibroblasts (MEFs) p27WT or p27À/À (Supplementary 2005). In another example it has been shown that Figures S2a and b). Moreover, by ChIP, we demon- overexpression of p27 induces the expression of ery- strated that p27 and E2F4 simultaneously associated throid markers in the K562 cell line (Acosta et al., 2008). with several p27-TG promoters enriched with E2Fs- All these data suggested that the nuclear role of p27 in binding sequences (Supplementary Figures S3 and S4) quiescence might rely not only on the inhibition of but not with the control (HoxB8) (Figure 2d). We cyclin-cdk complexes but also on the transcriptional subsequently studied whether p27 interacted with repression of specific target genes. specific co-repressors known to be associated with Thus, we hypothesize that p27 could interact with E2F4. IP experiments revealed that p27 co-immunopre- transcriptional regulators at specific gene promoters. We cipitated with endogenous p130, mSIN3A and histone explored this possibility by chromatin immunoprecipita- deacetylases (HDACs) 1, 4 and 5, indicating that they tion (ChIP) analysis followed by promoter microarrays form complexes in vivo (Figure 2e). The interaction of (chip). Results revealed that p27 associates with a p27 with p130 was confirmed by IPs with anti-p130 number of promoters in quiescent cells. These p27 (Supplementary Figure S2c). Finally, we checked target genes (p27-TGs) are mainly involved in RNA whether all these repressors associated with p27 on processing, translation, cell cycle and respiration. We p27-TG promoters. As observed in Figure 2f, in found that p27 has a role as a transcriptional repressor quiescent cells p27 associated with p130, mSIN3A and in coordination with p130 and E2F4. We have shown HDACs 1, 4 and 5 on several p27-TG promoters but not that p27-TGs are overexpressed in different tumors and on the control gene promoter. We also observed that this is associated with poor clinical outcome. p27 co-immunoprecipitated with ETS1 (Figure 2g). Moreover, ChIP experiments revealed the simultaneous presence of p27 and ETS1 on some p27-TG promoters Results enriched with Ets-binding sites (Figure 2h and Supple- mentary Figure S5). p27 binds to specific gene promoters Quiescent cells contain high levels of p27 mostly in the p130 directly interacts with p27 and recruits it nucleus (Supplementary Figure S1) (Shirane et al., on the p27-TG promoters 1999). Whether p27 has a role, aside from cyclin-cdk To analyze the functional relationship between p27 and inhibition in the nucleus of quiescent cells still remains p130/E2F4 in transcriptional regulation, we performed unclear. We therefore tested the possibility
Recommended publications
  • Screening and Identification of Key Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Bioinformatics Analysis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423889; this version posted December 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Screening and identification of key biomarkers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 , Iranna Kotturshetti 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karanataka, India. 3. Department of Ayurveda, Rajiv Gandhi Education Society`s Ayurvedic Medical College, Ron, Karnataka 562209, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423889; this version posted December 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common types of malignancy of the urinary system. The pathogenesis and effective diagnosis of ccRCC have become popular topics for research in the previous decade. In the current study, an integrated bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify core genes associated in ccRCC. An expression dataset (GSE105261) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and included 26 ccRCC and 9 normal kideny samples. Assessment of the microarray dataset led to the recognition of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which was subsequently used for pathway and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Translational Resistance of Late Alphavirus Mrna to Eif2␣ Phosphorylation: a Strategy to Overcome the Antiviral Effect of Protein Kinase PKR
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Translational resistance of late alphavirus mRNA to eIF2␣ phosphorylation: a strategy to overcome the antiviral effect of protein kinase PKR Iván Ventoso,1,3 Miguel Angel Sanz,2 Susana Molina,2 Juan José Berlanga,2 Luis Carrasco,2 and Mariano Esteban1 1Departamento de Biología Molecular y Celular, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain; 2Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Facultad de Ciencias, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain The double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) is one of the four mammalian kinases that phosphorylates the translation initiation factor 2␣ in response to virus infection. This kinase is induced by interferon and activated by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2␣ (eIF2␣) blocks translation initiation of both cellular and viral mRNA, inhibiting virus replication. To counteract this effect, most viruses express inhibitors that prevent PKR activation in infected cells. Here we report that PKR is highly activated following infection with alphaviruses Sindbis (SV) and Semliki Forest virus (SFV), leading to the almost complete phosphorylation of eIF2␣. Notably, subgenomic SV 26S mRNA is translated efficiently in the presence of phosphorylated eIF2␣. This modification of eIF2 does not restrict viral replication; SV 26S mRNA initiates translation with canonical methionine in the presence of high levels of phosphorylated eIF2␣. Genetic and biochemical data showed a highly stable RNA hairpin loop located downstream of the AUG initiator codon that is necessary to provide translational resistance to eIF2␣ phosphorylation. This structure can stall the ribosomes on the correct site to initiate translation of SV 26S mRNA, thus bypassing the requirement for a functional eIF2.
    [Show full text]
  • G2 Phase Cell Cycle Regulation by E2F4 Following Genotoxic Stress
    G2 Phase Cell Cycle Regulation by E2F4 Following Genotoxic Stress by MEREDITH ELLEN CROSBY Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Advisor: Dr. Alex Almasan Department of Environmental Health Sciences CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2006 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of ______________________________________________________ candidate for the Ph.D. degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………….1 LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………….5 LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………...7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………….8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………10 ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………...15 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. CELL CYCLE REGULATION: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW………………...17 1.2. THE E2F FAMILY OF TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS……………………….22 1.3. E2F AND CELL CYCLE CONTROL 1.3.1. G0/G1 Phase Transition………………………………………………….28 1.3.2. S Phase…………………………………………………………………...28 1.3.3. G2/M Phase Transition…………………………………………………..30 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Underlying Hub Genes and Molexular Pathogensis in Gastric Cancer by Integrated Bioinformatic Analyses
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.423656; this version posted December 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Investigation of the underlying hub genes and molexular pathogensis in gastric cancer by integrated bioinformatic analyses Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karanataka, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.423656; this version posted December 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract The high mortality rate of gastric cancer (GC) is in part due to the absence of initial disclosure of its biomarkers. The recognition of important genes associated in GC is therefore recommended to advance clinical prognosis, diagnosis and and treatment outcomes. The current investigation used the microarray dataset GSE113255 RNA seq data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database to diagnose differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Pathway and gene ontology enrichment analyses were performed, and a proteinprotein interaction network, modules, target genes - miRNA regulatory network and target genes - TF regulatory network were constructed and analyzed. Finally, validation of hub genes was performed. The 1008 DEGs identified consisted of 505 up regulated genes and 503 down regulated genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Data
    SUPPLEMENTARY DATA A cyclin D1-dependent transcriptional program predicts clinical outcome in mantle cell lymphoma Santiago Demajo et al. 1 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEX Supplementary Methods p. 3 Supplementary References p. 8 Supplementary Tables (S1 to S5) p. 9 Supplementary Figures (S1 to S15) p. 17 2 SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS Western blot, immunoprecipitation, and qRT-PCR Western blot (WB) analysis was performed as previously described (1), using cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-753, RRID:AB_2070433) and tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, T5168, RRID:AB_477579) antibodies. Co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed as described before (2), using cyclin D1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-8396, RRID:AB_627344) or control IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-2025, RRID:AB_737182) followed by protein G- magnetic beads (Invitrogen) incubation and elution with Glycine 100mM pH=2.5. Co-IP experiments were performed within five weeks after cell thawing. Cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-753), E2F4 (Bethyl, A302-134A, RRID:AB_1720353), FOXM1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-502, RRID:AB_631523), and CBP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-7300, RRID:AB_626817) antibodies were used for WB detection. In figure 1A and supplementary figure S2A, the same blot was probed with cyclin D1 and tubulin antibodies by cutting the membrane. In figure 2H, cyclin D1 and CBP blots correspond to the same membrane while E2F4 and FOXM1 blots correspond to an independent membrane. Image acquisition was performed with ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini (GE Healthcare). Image processing and quantification were performed with Multi Gauge software (Fujifilm). For qRT-PCR analysis, cDNA was generated from 1 µg RNA with qScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Quantabio). qRT–PCR reaction was performed using SYBR green (Roche).
    [Show full text]
  • Proteogenomic Analysis of Inhibitor of Differentiation 4 (ID4) in Basal-Like Breast Cancer Laura A
    Baker et al. Breast Cancer Research (2020) 22:63 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-01306-6 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Proteogenomic analysis of Inhibitor of Differentiation 4 (ID4) in basal-like breast cancer Laura A. Baker1,2, Holly Holliday1,2†, Daniel Roden1,2†, Christoph Krisp3,4†, Sunny Z. Wu1,2, Simon Junankar1,2, Aurelien A. Serandour5, Hisham Mohammed5, Radhika Nair6, Geetha Sankaranarayanan5, Andrew M. K. Law1,2, Andrea McFarland1, Peter T. Simpson7, Sunil Lakhani7,8, Eoin Dodson1,2, Christina Selinger9, Lyndal Anderson9,10, Goli Samimi11, Neville F. Hacker12, Elgene Lim1,2, Christopher J. Ormandy1,2, Matthew J. Naylor13, Kaylene Simpson14,15, Iva Nikolic14, Sandra O’Toole1,2,9,10, Warren Kaplan1, Mark J. Cowley1,2, Jason S. Carroll5, Mark Molloy3 and Alexander Swarbrick1,2* Abstract Background: Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) is a poorly characterised, heterogeneous disease. Patients are diagnosed with aggressive, high-grade tumours and often relapse with chemotherapy resistance. Detailed understanding of the molecular underpinnings of this disease is essential to the development of personalised therapeutic strategies. Inhibitor of differentiation 4 (ID4) is a helix-loop-helix transcriptional regulator required for mammary gland development. ID4 is overexpressed in a subset of BLBC patients, associating with a stem-like poor prognosis phenotype, and is necessary for the growth of cell line models of BLBC through unknown mechanisms. Methods: Here, we have defined unique molecular insights into the function of ID4 in BLBC and the related disease high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), by combining RIME proteomic analysis, ChIP-seq mapping of genomic binding sites and RNA-seq.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytoplasmic E2f4 Forms Organizing Centres for Initiation of Centriole Amplification During Multiciliogenesis
    ARTICLE Received 13 Feb 2017 | Accepted 8 May 2017 | Published 4 Jul 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15857 OPEN Cytoplasmic E2f4 forms organizing centres for initiation of centriole amplification during multiciliogenesis Munemasa Mori1, Renin Hazan2, Paul S. Danielian2, John E. Mahoney1,w, Huijun Li1, Jining Lu1, Emily S. Miller2, Xueliang Zhu3, Jacqueline A. Lees2 & Wellington V. Cardoso1 Abnormal development of multiciliated cells is a hallmark of a variety of human conditions associated with chronic airway diseases, hydrocephalus and infertility. Multiciliogenesis requires both activation of a specialized transcriptional program and assembly of cytoplasmic structures for large-scale centriole amplification that generates basal bodies. It remains unclear, however, what mechanism initiates formation of these multiprotein complexes in epithelial progenitors. Here we show that this is triggered by nucleocytoplasmic translocation of the transcription factor E2f4. After inducing a transcriptional program of centriole biogenesis, E2f4 forms apical cytoplasmic organizing centres for assembly and nucleation of deuterosomes. Using genetically altered mice and E2F4 mutant proteins we demonstrate that centriole amplification is crucially dependent on these organizing centres and that, without cytoplasmic E2f4, deuterosomes are not assembled, halting multiciliogenesis. Thus, E2f4 integrates nuclear and previously unsuspected cytoplasmic events of centriole amplification, providing new perspectives for the understanding of normal ciliogenesis, ciliopathies and cancer. 1 Columbia Center for Human Development, Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Allergy Critical Care, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York 10032, USA. 2 David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. 3 State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yueyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporterseq Reveals Genome-Wide Dynamic Modulators of the Heat
    RESEARCH ARTICLE ReporterSeq reveals genome-wide dynamic modulators of the heat shock response across diverse stressors Brian D Alford1†, Eduardo Tassoni-Tsuchida1,2†, Danish Khan1, Jeremy J Work1, Gregory Valiant3, Onn Brandman1* 1Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, United States; 2Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States; 3Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States Abstract Understanding cellular stress response pathways is challenging because of the complexity of regulatory mechanisms and response dynamics, which can vary with both time and the type of stress. We developed a reverse genetic method called ReporterSeq to comprehensively identify genes regulating a stress-induced transcription factor under multiple conditions in a time- resolved manner. ReporterSeq links RNA-encoded barcode levels to pathway-specific output under genetic perturbations, allowing pooled pathway activity measurements via DNA sequencing alone and without cell enrichment or single-cell isolation. We used ReporterSeq to identify regulators of the heat shock response (HSR), a conserved, poorly understood transcriptional program that protects cells from proteotoxicity and is misregulated in disease. Genome-wide HSR regulation in budding yeast was assessed across 15 stress conditions, uncovering novel stress-specific, time- specific, and constitutive regulators. ReporterSeq can assess the genetic regulators of any transcriptional pathway with the scale of pooled genetic screens and the precision of pathway- specific readouts. *For correspondence: [email protected] †These authors contributed equally to this work Introduction Competing interests: The The heat shock response (HSR) is a conserved stress response that shields cells from cytoplasmic authors declare that no proteotoxicity by increasing the expression of protective proteins (Lindquist, 1986; Mori- competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Translational Control in Cancer Etiology
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Translational Control in Cancer Etiology Davide Ruggero Helen Diller Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158 Correspondence: [email protected] The link between perturbations in translational control and cancer etiology is becoming a primary focus in cancer research. It has now been established that genetic alterations in several components of the translational apparatus underlie spontaneous cancers as well as an entire class of inherited syndromes known as “ribosomopathies” associated with in- creased cancer susceptibility. These discoveries have illuminated the importance of dereg- ulations in translational control to very specific cellular processes that contribute to cancer etiology. In addition, a growing body of evidence supports the view that deregulation of translational control is a common mechanism by which diverse oncogenic pathways promote cellular transformation and tumor development. Indeed, activation of these key oncogenic pathways induces rapid and dramatic translational reprogramming both by in- creasing overall protein synthesis and by modulating specific mRNA networks. These trans- lational changes promote cellular transformation, impacting almost every phase of tumor development. This paradigm represents a new frontier in the multihit model of cancer for- mation and offers significant promise for innovative cancer therapies. Current research,
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Methods
    SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR: Intrinsic specificity differences between transcription factor paralogs partly explain their differential in vivo binding Ning Shen1,2,3, Jingkang Zhao1,3,4, Joshua Schipper1,3, Yuning Zhang1,4,Tristan Bepler1, Dan Leehr1, John Bradley1, John Horton1,3, Hilmar Lapp1, Raluca Gordan1,3,5* 1Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, 2Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, 3Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 4Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 5Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Methods ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. ChIP-seq and DNase-seq data ................................................................................................................. 1 2. Design of DNA libraries for gcPBM assays .......................................................................................... 1 3. Protein expression and purification .................................................................................................... 3 4. Universal and genomic-context PBM assays ..................................................................................... 4 5. gcPBM data processing. Identifying core motifs .............................................................................. 4 6. Building core-stratified SVR models of TF-DNA binding specificity
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Regulation of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Expression
    Transcriptional and Post-transcriptional Regulation of ATP-binding Cassette Transporter Expression by Aparna Chhibber DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Pbarmacogenomies in the Copyright 2014 by Aparna Chhibber ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Deanna Kroetz. More than just a research advisor, Deanna has clearly made it a priority to guide her students to become better scientists, and I am grateful for the countless hours she has spent editing papers, developing presentations, discussing research, and so much more. I would not have made it this far without her support and guidance. My thesis committee has provided valuable advice through the years. Dr. Nadav Ahituv in particular has been a source of support from my first year in the graduate program as my academic advisor, qualifying exam committee chair, and finally thesis committee member. Dr. Kathy Giacomini graciously stepped in as a member of my thesis committee in my 3rd year, and Dr. Steven Brenner provided valuable input as thesis committee member in my 2nd year. My labmates over the past five years have been incredible colleagues and friends. Dr. Svetlana Markova first welcomed me into the lab and taught me numerous laboratory techniques, and has always been willing to act as a sounding board. Michael Martin has been my partner-in-crime in the lab from the beginning, and has made my days in lab fly by. Dr. Yingmei Lui has made the lab run smoothly, and has always been willing to jump in to help me at a moment’s notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Atypical E2fs Link Endocycle Control to Cancer
    Mammalian Atypical E2Fs Link Endocycle Control to Cancer DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Hui-Zi Chen Graduate Program in Integrated Biomedical Science Program The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Gustavo Leone, PhD, Advisor Michael Ostrowski, PhD Clay Marsh, MD Tsonwin Hai, PhD Kathryn Wikenheiser-Brokamp, MD PhD Copyright by Hui-Zi Chen 2011 Abstract The endocycle is a developmentally programmed variant cell cycle consisting of successive S (DNA synthesis) and G (Gap) phases without an intervening M phase or cytokinesis. As a consequence of the regulated “decoupling” of DNA replication and mitosis, which are two central processes of the traditional cell division program, endocycling cells acquire highly polyploid genomes after having undergone multiple rounds of whole genome reduplication. Although essential for metazoan development, relatively little is known about the regulation of endocycle or its physiologic role in higher vertebrates such as the mammal. A substantial body of work in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster has demonstrated an important function for dE2Fs in the control of endocycle. Genetic studies showed that both endocycle initiation and progression is severely disrupted by altering the expression of the fly E2F activator (dE2F1) or repressor (dE2F2). In mammals, the E2F family is comprised of nine structurally related proteins, encoded by eight distinct genes, that can be classified into transcriptional activators (E2f1, E2f2, E2f3a and E2f3b) or repressors (E2f4, E2f5, E2f6, E2f7 and E2f8). The repressor subclass may then be further divided into canonical (E2f4, E2f5 and E2f6) or atypical E2fs (E2f7 and E2f8).
    [Show full text]