<<

UCSF UC San Francisco Previously Published Works

Title Central Adaptation following .

Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ds5z53m

Authors Simon, Neil G Franz, Colin K Gupta, Nalin et al.

Publication Date 2016

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.027

Peer reviewed

eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Literature Reviews

Central Adaptation following Brachial Plexus Injury Neil G. Simon1, Colin K. Franz2,3, Nalin Gupta4, Tord Alden5,6, Michel Kliot6

Key words Brachial plexus trauma (BPT) often affects young patients and may result in - Apraxia lasting functional deficits. Standard care following BPT involves monitoring for - Brachial plexus injury - Central adaptation clinical and electrophysiological evidence of muscle reinnervation, with sur- - trauma gical treatment decisions based on the presence or absence of spontaneous - Neuroplasticity recovery. Data are emerging to suggest that central and peripheral adaptation may play a role in recovery following BPT. The present review highlights Abbreviations and Acronyms BPT: Brachial plexus trauma adaptive and maladaptive mechanisms of central and peripheral nervous system CIMT: Constraint-induced movement therapy changes following BPT that may contribute to functional outcomes. Rehabili- CNS: Central nervous system tation and other treatment strategies that harness or modulate these intrinsic EMG: adaptive mechanisms may improve functional outcomes following BPT. ES: Electrical stimulation H-reflex: Hoffman reflex MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging OBPP: Obstetric brachial plexus palsy PNI: Peripheral RECOVERY FROM BPT functional recovery, with no residual def- fi Recovery of nerve tracts following BPT icits identi ed on serial clinician or phys- 1St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South 1 2 relies on a complex cascade of peripheral iotherapist review. However up to 15% of Wales, Australia; Department of Physical Medicine and fi Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, and 3Sensory Motor nerve regenerative processes, culminating patients have persisting signi cant fi 1 Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, in target muscle reinnervation.3 In de cits, and the proportion of patients 4 Illinois, USA; Departments of Neurological Surgery and instances of severe injury to the brachial with spontaneous functional recovery Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, may be overestimated.11 5 plexus or nerve roots, successful nerve USA; Division of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie In patients with residual deficits, a Children’s Hospital of Chicago, and 6Department of regeneration might not be possible Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg without surgical brachial plexus pattern of recovery may be seen, with most fi School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. reconstruction.4,5 de cits seen in C5- to C7-innervated To whom correspondence should be addressed: Even patients in whom regenerating muscles. pronation typically 12 Michel Kliot, M.D. nerve fibers reach the target muscles, improves before forearm supination. The [E-mail: [email protected]] there are substantial barriers to a good degree of recovery of external Citation: World Neurosurg. (2016) 85:325-332. fl functional outcome. The process of axonal rotation, elbow exion, and forearm http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.027 regeneration is inefficient, and sprouting supination at 3 months predicts which Journal homepage: www.WORLDNEUROSURGERY.org fibers may not reconnect with the appro- children will retain persistent functional Available online: www.sciencedirect.com fi 12 priate fascicle beyond the injured de cits. In children with residual ª 1878-8750/$ - see front matter 2016 Elsevier Inc. segment.6,7 Fibers that reach the target impairment, functional tasks can typically All rights reserved. muscle do so in substantially reduced be performed using the injured limb, but numbers, resulting in incomplete rein- with asymmetric movement relative to fl nervation and a reduced number of func- the uninvolved limb. Elbow exion and INTRODUCTION tional motor units.8 Although the shoulder abduction are the functional Brachial plexus trauma (BPT) occurs in dynamics of motor unit recruitment can movements that prove most challenging two different age groups. Obstetric recover from nerve injury if the muscle is in patients after severe OBPP, but brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a recog- reinnervated by the same motor nerve,9 shoulder external rotation and forearm nized complication of , with an aberrant reinnervation can affect this supination are usually the most affected 1 12,13 incidence of 0.3% of deliveries. The next process.10 movements and recover last. These peak in the incidence of BPT is in described patterns of recovery and younger (usually male) adults, and it is Maladaptive Central Processes following residual functional impairment inform often caused by motor vehicle accidents BPT rehabilitation strategies, although therapy 2 or penetrating wounds. Beyond peripheral nerve regeneration, paradigms are largely empiric and are fl BPT can result in severe and lasting central processes are involved in deter- based on splinting of ail wrists and neurologic impairments, and because the mining successful or failed functional elbows to prevent dislocation and passive affected patients are young, it has a long- recovery following BPT. range-of-motion exercises to prevent term effect on work and societal roles. contractures. As such, optimizing recovery from Developmental Apraxia. The majority of In a small subgroup of patients with brachial plexus injury is critical. patients with OBPP make an excellent residual symptoms, electromyography

WORLD NEUROSURGERY 85: 325-332, JANUARY 2016 www.WORLDNEUROSURGERY.org 325 LITERATURE REVIEWS NEIL G. SIMON ET AL. RECOVERY FROM BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

(EMG) studies of the affected limb Investigations of patients with develop- avulsion. EMG showed no voluntary units demonstrate active motor units in weak mental apraxia identified that reduction of in his left biceps and shoulder abductor muscles, suggesting at least partial rein- motor skills and muscle strength were muscles, but little active muscle denerva- nervation, but clinical function remains exaggerated when compared with neuro- tion. A postganglionic injury of the left poor.14 This unique issue has been termed physiological and physical muscle responses upper trunk was diagnosed. developmental apraxia and is considered to to peripheral nerve stimulation.15 This He was taken to surgery and after being be an example of maladaptive central finding was interpreted as being indicative anesthetized, electrodiagnostic testing motor programming early in infancy of impaired voluntary motor unit was performed. Transcutaneous stimula- following OBPP.15 The presence of EMG activation, suggesting defective motor tion of his left Erb’s region gave rise to activity in these clinically weak muscles programming development in early infancy. contraction of his left biceps, supra- has been apportioned to “luxury A separate study used transcranial spinatus, infraspinatus, and deltoid mus- innervation,” which refers to the magnetic stimulation to examine a cohort cles. Transcranial electrical stimulation phenomenon of additional muscle of patients with OBPP without evidence of (ES) of the right motor cortex also gave innervation from spinal segments beyond functional recovery.18 Motor evoked rise to motor evoked potential responses those typical for the individual muscle. potentials were recordable in all patients, in these muscles (Figure 1). As such, a typically C5- and C6- confirming the presence of an intact He underwent surgical exploration innervated muscle, such as biceps, may connection between the motor cortex of his infraclavicular brachial plexus. A have luxury innervation from C7, resulting and muscle, and suggesting that the supraclavicular brachial plexus exploration in the presence of active motor units on failure of functional recovery could be was not performed. Direct stimulation of EMG with minimal functional movement. due to abnormalities of central motor the left gave rise Luxury innervation begins between weeks control processes. to contraction in the biceps muscle. 16 and 25 of gestation and is usually lost Similarly, direct stimulation of the axillary after the age of 3 months.16,17 Limb Illustrative Case 1: Developmental nerve gave rise to a contraction in deltoid. immobilization in the period of sensory Apraxia Because of a lack of functional recovery in and motor brain organization, such as A 17-month-old baby boy suffered a severe elbow flexion, a side-to-side median to following OBPP, can result in incomplete left brachial plexus injury at birth resulting musculocutaneous nerve repair was per- realization of this reserve function, and in a complete upper trunk palsy on clinical formed to provide a supplementary source harnessing this reserve capacity may examination. Magnetic resonance imaging of to biceps with minimal iatrogenic benefit recovery.18 (MRI) showed no evidence of nerve root neurological morbidity.19 Postoperatively he

Figure 1. Developmental apraxia following obstetric brachial plexus palsy (Illustrative Case 1). Intraoperative electrophysiology (A, B) identified retained responses from biceps to brachial plexus and cortical stimulation in the absence of voluntary activity of the muscle. (C) Three months after a side-to-side anastomosis of the median to musculocutaneous nerve, functional elbow flexion returned.

326 www.SCIENCEDIRECT.com WORLD NEUROSURGERY, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.027 LITERATURE REVIEWS NEIL G. SIMON ET AL. RECOVERY FROM BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY underwent weekly transcutaneous ES of the developmental apraxia described above, recovery. Disordered motor control left brachial plexus at Erb’spointwith but central adaptation may nonetheless may be triggered by abnormal contraction of the biceps muscle. At 4 play a role in functional recovery. In gen- potentiation of sensory inputs and motor weeks, he showed trace ability to contract eral terms, peripheral nerve injury (PNI) outputs.48 Exaggerated somatosensory his left biceps muscles; by 2 months, he initiates rapid changes in cortical activity. reorganization following nerve injury may was able to contract his left biceps muscle In animal models, nerve transection re- be an important mediator of neuropathic voluntarily and feed himself. Deltoid sults in rapid silencing of corresponding pain, such as phantom limb pain function improved spontaneously. cortical sensory areas, and equally rapid following amputation.49,50 Finally, unmasking of areas corresponding to un- recovery from nerve transfer procedures Pain and Neuronal Hyperactivity injured hand .42 These unmasked may rely on cortical plasticity. As an BPT in adults is frequently complicated by areas expand progressively to become example, improved control of biceps was “nerve pain,” which is another example of detailed representations of the hand, associated with a shift in biceps cortical maladaptive central nervous system (CNS) including the adoption of median- representation following intercostal to neuroplasticity. Nerve pain can manifest innervated skin territories.42 There is musculocutaneous nerve transfer to treat itself in different ways, including neuro- decreased g-aminobutyric acid staining cervical root avulsion.51 Controlling the pathic and phantom limb patterns.20 in the silenced cortical region, extent of reorganization of sensorimotor Neuropathic pain in the affected limb suggesting the mechanism of the circuits may help to focus reorganization can range from uncomfortable tingling evolving cortical plastic changes may be toward adaptive processes.8 sensations to intense burning or shooting through decreased intracortical pains down the arm. On examination, it inhibition.43 In humans, ischemic REHABILITATION OF BRACHIAL PLEXUS is characterized by hypersensitivity to block reduces inhibition at painful stimuli (i.e., hyperalgesia) and the motor cortical level, producing painful sensations associated with increased excitability of the corticospinal Current approaches to the rehabilitation of typically nonpainful sensations (i.e., system.44 Of interest, cortical plasticity BPT emphasize the mitigation of second- allodynia). Phantom limb pain, which is may be more extensive for gross motor ary complications from nerve damage most often associated with a referred pain than for fine motor movements, which (e.g., contractures, neuropathic pain) and perceived in the place of the missing limb may contribute to the relatively poor improvement of task performance. These 52,53 of amputees, is also known to occur in recovery of fine motor control following strategies have been reviewed recently, deafferented limbs with BPT, typically severe lower brachial plexus injury.45 but there remain no proven clinical reha- when adjacent body sites are stimulated. Brain network changes are observed bilitation strategies to enhance nerve The central mechanisms underlying pain following severe BPT.46,47 Following total reinnervation. There is a growing body of after nerve injuries seem to involve brachial plexus avulsion causing a func- basic science evidence to support specific changes in ion channel expression by tionless limb, resting state functional MRI rehabilitative interventions to accelerate 54,55 dorsal root ganglia neurons,21-23 intrinsic studies identified cortical reorganization regeneration and CNS plasticity. excitability of dorsal root ganglia in the hemisphere ipsilateral and contra- neurons,24-30 and reorganization at the lateral to the side of injury.46 Cortical Sensory Re-Education level of the somatosensory cortex31,32 and activity changes included motor and The function of the hand depends on the subcortical structures, such as the premotor areas and brain regions precision of both motor control and sen- thalamus33 and brainstem.34,35 This form associated with motor task integration sory feedback. Pioneering work from the of maladaptive CNS neuroplasticity is (right precuneus) and spatial aspects of groups of Wynn Parry56,57 and Dellon58 related to age, because chronic pain rarely motor control (posterior parietal cortex described novel sensory re-education occurs in infants with OBPP,36 and it and superior parietal pole).46 Of interest, training protocols supported by their appears to be inversely related to the right OBPP resulted in a left-to-right shift observations of good patient outcomes extent of reinnervation.36,37 Reinnervation of language function.47 Brain when applied after PNI and repair. This also corresponds to normalization of deep reorganization was more extensive for work was inspired by the emerging tendon reflexes after nerve injury, such as dominant than nondominant limb concepts around neural plasticity during can be demonstrated by following the injuries.46 Beyond motor cortex changes, that era59 and was widely adopted by the recovery of the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex), further adaptation occurs at spinal and rehabilitation community. In practice, the electrical analogue to the subcortical levels.8 the protocols for sensory re-education monosynaptic stretch reflex.38 The can vary. They range from the simple H-reflex is highly facilitated at early stages Is There a Role for Modulating Central recognition of common objects and tex- of reinnervation, but gradually reverts Processes following BPT? tures to pairing tactile stimuli with closer to normal levels in the subsequent How these experimental findings translate completely different sensations (e.g., months after reinnervation.39-41 in the clinic is presently unclear. Cortical vision) and illusions (i.e., mirror visual plasticity can functionally compensate for feedback) with the hope of achieving Brain Remodeling following BPT the lack of specificity in target reinnerva- activation of the deprived cortical areas.32 Central processes in adults with BPT are tion by regenerating axons following Although sensory re-education rehabilita- less profound than in cases of severe PNI,8 thus optimizing functional tion for BPT has traditionally been

WORLD NEUROSURGERY 85: 325-332, JANUARY 2016 www.WORLDNEUROSURGERY.org 327 LITERATURE REVIEWS NEIL G. SIMON ET AL. RECOVERY FROM BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY initiated at the first clinical signs of skin There have been no randomized control segment was resected, and a 2-cm syn- reinnervation, more recently it has been trials investigating CIMT for BPT, but thetic bioabsorbable tube was interposed explored during the pre-reinnervation there are several recent case reports that between the proximal and distal ends. phase of recovery.32 Despite the long- are suggestive of a potential beneficial Nine months later, nascent voluntary units standing use of this intervention in reha- effect.73-76 were seen in the right shoulder abductor bilitation of PNI and BPT, it is not clini- muscles (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, cally established whether improvements Exercise and deltoid muscles), but none were with sensory re-education rehabilitation Patients are routinely exercised as toler- found in the right biceps muscle. A sec- are a result of somatosensory cortex reor- ated in rehabilitation after nerve injury, ond surgery was performed in which the ganization or simply a practice effect.60 but whether this actually improves nerve right musculocutaneous nerve was Two recent systematic reviews on sensory regeneration is still not known in humans. exposed using an infraclavicular approach. re-education conclude that it still Perhaps the lack of investigation is a result Direct stimulation of the right muscu- lacks high-level clinical evidence.61,62 of early preclinical rodent work showing locutaneous nerve gave rise to no Thus, a prospective multicenter, random- mixed results from exercise, including contraction of the biceps muscles, but did ized trial of sensory re-education with no beneficial effect77 or even delayed give rise to a somatosensory evoked po- measurements of hand sensibility, hand reinnervation.78,79 Subsequent work tential response over the contralateral function, and patient-reported outcomes demonstrating increased neurotrophic cortex. The decision was made to perform would be highly desirable. factor expression after exercise80-83 a side-to-side median to musculocuta- appeared to renew interest in the study neous nerve repair. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy of exercise on nerve regeneration. More After the surgery, the patient underwent Constraint-induced movement therapy recently, treadmill running in rats with including constrain- (CIMT) is a well-established approach to both endurance84-88 and interval86,88 induced movement therapy, limiting the managing a paretic limb after stroke63;it training regimens have been shown to use of the unaffected limb. He received has demonstrated at least short-term effi- promote axon regeneration and to specific motor retraining, focusing on cacy in BPT compared with other conven- prevent the “synaptic stripping,” which is coactivation of biceps and the wrist flexors tional rehabilitation approaches.64 CIMT known to occur on motor neuron soma to facilitate elbow flexion. Nine months has undergone many permutations in after PNI.89-92 The functional significance later, his right biceps muscle was found to practice, but it generally consists of three of this form of central adaptation from be dually innervated by both his right principle components: (1) immobilization exercise is supported by enhanced musculocutaneous and median nerves.19 of the normal limb; (2) task-oriented recovery of spinal reflexes.87,93,94 Trying to contract his right biceps training with high repetition; and (3) Although the detail of the optimal muscles produced only a grade 1e2 behavioral strategies aimed at translating exercise prescription has yet to be motor response, as did flexing his right skills from the clinical setting to the elucidated, there is some evidence that wrist. Combining both activities patient’s home environment. Interestingly, recommendations may be gender produced a grade 3e4 motor response much of the original preclinical work specific95,96 and dependent on growth (Figure 2). underpinning CIMT in for stroke rehabili- factor upregulation.97,98 Despite the delay of 18 months from the tation was actually developed in a nerve injury to the second surgery, it was likely injury monkey model that caused upper Illustrative Case 2: Recovery from BPT that the median nerve axons extended into limb deafferentation by dorsal rhizotomy. A 34-year-old, right-handed man sustained residual biceps muscle endplates, pro- When a single forelimb was deafferented, a severe right brachial plexus injury, leav- ducing the functional improvements, with the monkey would not make use of the ing him with complete motor deficits in successful regeneration of target muscle affected limb when it had a choice, despite an upper trunk distribution. MRI showed endplates typically noted within approxi- the intact motor connections65; this was no evidence of nerve root avulsion, and mately 2 years from a nerve injury.4 The termed learned non-use. Learned non-use EMG showed extensive denervation in rehabilitation strategies described were could be overcome with training to use right shoulder abductor and biceps mus- used with the intention of optimizing the deafferented limb by restricting move- cles with no voluntary units. At 9 months, functional reorganization after the ment of the intact limb for several days.66 he underwent a surgical exploration of his neurotization procedure,5 although it Given the rapid improvements that were right brachial plexus. The upper trunk was cannot be stated with certainty that they observed and the fact that the dorsal extensively scarred. ES distal and proximal affected functional recovery. rhizotomy paradigm did not permit for to the scarred portion of upper trunk gave peripheral axon regrowth, the mechanism no motor responses. Stimulation of the Electrical Stimulation for CIMT has been long attributed to CNS upper trunk proximal to the scarred The emergence of a brief ES protocol plasticity.67 While clinical evidence to portion of upper trunk gave rise to a delivered as a single-dose treatment support central adaptation as a positive somatosensory evoked potential (supramaximal stimulation for 1 hour at 20 mechanism for CIMT rehabilitation after response over the contralateral cortex Hz), developed in the laboratory of stroke has emerged,68-72 it is not clear demonstrating the presence of axons Al-Majed et al.99,100 and inspired by earlier that this same mechanism is necessarily proximal, but not distal to the scarred works,101,102 is an excellent example of involved when CIMT is applied to BPT. segment of upper trunk. The scarred “bench to bedside” science in rehabilitation

328 www.SCIENCEDIRECT.com WORLD NEUROSURGERY, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.027 LITERATURE REVIEWS NEIL G. SIMON ET AL. RECOVERY FROM BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

Figure 2. Example of central drive affecting recovery from brachial plexus injury treatment (Illustrative Case 2). A patient who underwent a side-to-side anastomosis of an intact median nerve to a damaged musculocutaneous nerve recovered elbow flexion function. Electromyelography (EMG) activity was synchronously recorded from biceps (upper tracing) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR, lower tracing). (A) Biceps EMG activity was minimal when the patient attempted to flex the elbow alone. (B) Moderate interference pattern in the biceps was observed when the patient attempted to flex the wrist alone. (C) A full interference pattern was observed in the biceps when the patient flexed the wrist and elbow together. medicine. These findings have been robust models deal with regeneration distances reinnervation. Evidence is accumulating that and reproduced in several separate labora- of 2e3 cm at the most. Repeated brief ES central adaptation factors are relevant to the tories. The results of two small, random- for brachial plexus provides recovery following PNI, and in some in- ized control trials on patients with severe technical challenges because to date it has stances it can contribute to suboptimal carpal tunnel syndrome103 or traumatic been applied to humans with temporary functional outcomes. Modulating CNS digital nerve transection104 demonstrated transcutaneous wires applied directly to responses to peripheral nerve trauma is a accelerated nerve regeneration and, in the the and then removed after component of current rehabilitation strate- case of the digital nerve injury, improved the treatment. To this end, Franz et al.110 gies. Further research using methods to functional outcomes. Although brief ES have developed a brief ES transvertebral modulate central adaptation after BPT and has not been applied to patients or stimulation method in mice for other peripheral nerve injuries is suggested preclinical models of BPT, it stands to transsynaptic activation of lower motor to explore this potential therapeutic reason that it might offer similar benefits. neurons that might better lend itself to approach. Although the primary effect appears to be reapplication over long durations. the augmentation of peripheral ACKNOWLEDGMENTS reinnervation, there is emerging evidence Transcranial Stimulation N.G.S. and C.K.F. contributed equally to that brief ES may also improve the Beyond repetitive nerve stimulation, brain 41 this work as first authors. recovery of spinal reflexes and work stimulation modalities have been explored 87 synergistically with treadmill running. as a means to improve recovery after PNI, Functional reinnervation after nerve injury although this approach remains experi- REFERENCES requires the re-establishment of appropri- mental. For example, lasting increases in 1. Backe B, Magnussen EB, Johansen OJ, Sellaeg G, ately matched axon-target reconnections in the excitability of target muscles are pro- Russwurm H. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: the periphery105 that precedes the a birth injury not explained by the known duced when transcranial magnetic stimu- risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87: re-establishment of central connectivity on lation of the primary motor cortex is paired 1027-1032. 106 motor neurons. Consider that both the with synchronous peripheral nerve stimu- 107 precision of reinnervation and the lation.111 stimulation protocols 2. Dubuisson AS, Kline DG. Brachial plexus injury: recovery of the monosynaptic stretch improved peripheral nerve repair and a survey of 100 consecutive cases from a single fl 108 service. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:673-682. discussion re ex circuit recover better after nerve synaptic formation in an animal model of 682e673. 107,109 crush than after nerve transection, nerve injury.112 Cortical stimulation which underlies how intimately related paradigms have been applied to the 3. Fu SY, Gordon T. The cellular and molecular CNS plasticity is to the restoration of treatment of pain after nerve injury in basis of peripheral nerve regeneration. Mol Neurobiol. 1997;14:67-116. peripheral nervous system connectivity. humans, resulting in reduction of chronic 113 Finally, although Gordon et al. have pain. However, it is presently unknown 4. Simon NG, Spinner R, Kline DG, Kliot M. successfully developed a single-dose brief whether cortical stimulation results in Advances in the neurological and neurosur- 103 ES protocol, it is not clear whether a improved functional recovery after nerve gical management of peripheral nerve trauma single treatment with brief ES would be [e-pub ahead of print]. J Neurol Neurosurg injury, and this approach warrants further Psychiatry. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp- sufficient to promote nerve regeneration investigation. 2014e310175. over longer distances required with human brachial plexus lesions. The 5. Korus L, Ross DC, Doherty CD, Miller TA. Nerve existing data on brief ES in humans have CONCLUSIONS transfers and neurotization in peripheral nerve fi injury, from surgery to rehabilitation [e-pub been accumulated only for distal nerve BPT can produce severe and lasting de cits ahead of print]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry lesions. The data from preclinical rodent through incomplete and inefficient 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-310420.

WORLD NEUROSURGERY 85: 325-332, JANUARY 2016 www.WORLDNEUROSURGERY.org 329 LITERATURE REVIEWS NEIL G. SIMON ET AL. RECOVERY FROM BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

6. Abernethy DA, Rud A, Thomas PK. Neurotropic 21. Ishikawa K, Tanaka M, Black JA, Waxman SG. 37. Berman JS, Birch R, Anand P. Pain following influence of the distal stump of transected pe- Changes in expression of voltage-gated potas- human brachial plexus injury with spinal cord ripheral nerve on axonal regeneration: absence sium channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons root avulsion and the effect of surgery. Pain. of topographic specificity in adult nerve. J Anat. following axotomy. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:502-507. 1998;75:199-207. 1992;180(Pt 3):395-400. 22. Waxman SG, Cummins TR, Dib-Hajj SD, 38. Simon NG, Lin CS-Y, Lee M, Howells J, Vucic S, 7. Madison RD, Archibald SJ, Brushart TM. Rein- Black JA. Voltage-gated sodium channels and the Burke D, et al. Segmental motoneuronal nervation accuracy of the rat femoral nerve by molecular pathogenesis of pain: a review. dysfunction is a feature of amyotrophic lateral motor and sensory neurons. J Neurosci. 1996;16: J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:517-528. sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126:828-836. 5698-5703. 23. Wood JN, Boorman JP, Okuse K, Baker MD. 39. Valero-Cabre A, Navarro X. H reflex restitution 8. Navarro X, Vivo M, Valero-Cabre A. Neural Voltage-gated sodium channels and pain path- and facilitation after different types of periph- plasticity after peripheral nerve injury and ways. J Neurobiol. 2004;61:55-71. eral nerve injury and repair. Brain Res. 2001;919: regeneration. Prog Neurobiol. 2007;82:163-201. 302-312. 24. Abdulla FA, Moran TD, Balasubramanyan S, 9. Cope TC, Clark BD. Motor-unit recruitment in Smith PA. Effects and consequences of nerve 40. Valero-Cabre A, Navarro X. Changes in crossed self-reinnervated muscle. J Neurophysiol. 1993;70: injury on the electrical properties of sensory spinal reflexes after peripheral nerve injury and 1787-1796. neurons. Can J Physiol Pharm. 2003;81:663-682. repair. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:1763-1771.

10. Liuzzi FJ, Tedeschi B. Peripheral nerve regener- 25. Abdulla FA, Smith PA. Axotomy- and autotomy- 41. Vivo M, Puigdemasa A, Casals L, Asensio E, ation. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1991;2:31-42. induced changes in the excitability of rat dorsal Udina E, Navarro X. Immediate electrical stim- root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85: ulation enhances regeneration and reinnervation 11. Pondaag W, Malessy MJ, van Dijk JG, 630-643. and modulates spinal plastic changes after Thomeer RT. Natural history of obstetric brachial sciatic nerve injury and repair. Exp Neurol. 2008; plexus palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child 26. Gurtu S, Smith PA. Electrophysiological charac- 211:180-193. Neurol. 2004;46:138-144. teristics of hamster dorsal-root ganglion-cells and their response to axotomy. J Neurophysiol. 42. Merzenich MM, Kaas JH, Wall JT, Sur M, 12. Lagerkvist AL, Johansson U, Johansson A, 1988;59:408-423. Nelson RJ, Felleman DJ. Progression of change Bager B, Uvebrant P. Obstetric brachial plexus following median nerve section in the cortical palsy: a prospective, population-based study of 27. Kim YI, Na HS, Kim SH, Han HC, Yoon YW, representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in incidence, recovery, and residual impairment at fi Sung B, et al. Cell type-speci c changes of the adult owl and squirrel monkeys. Neuroscience. 18 months of age. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52: membrane properties of peripherally-axotomized 1983;10:639-665. 529-534. dorsal root ganglion neurons in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience. 1998;86:301-309. 43. Garraghty PE, LaChica EA, Kaas JH. Injury- 13. Hoeksma AF, ter Steeg AM, Nelissen RG, van induced reorganization of somatosensory cortex Ouwerkerk WJ, Lankhorst GJ, de Jong BA. 28. Koerber HR, Mirnics K, Mendell LM. Properties is accompanied by reductions in GABA staining. Neurological recovery in obstetric brachial plexus of regenerated primary afferents and their Somatosens Mot Res. 1991;8:347-354. injuries: an historical cohort study. Dev Med Child functional connections. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73: Neurol. 2004;46:76-83. 693-702. 44. Brasil-Neto JP, Valls-Sole J, Pascual-Leone A, Cammarota A, Amassian VE, Cracco R, et al. 14. Scarfone H, McComas AJ, Pape K, Newberry R. 29. Ma C, Shu YS, Zheng Z, Chen Y, Yao H, Rapid modulation of human cortical motor Denervation and reinnervation in congenital Greenquist KW, et al. Similar electrophysiolog- outputs following ischaemic nerve block. Brain. brachial palsy. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:600-607. ical changes in axotomized and neighboring 1993;116(Pt 3):511-525. intact dorsal root ganglion neurons. 15. Brown T, Cupido C, Scarfone H, Pape K, J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:1588-1602. Galea V, McComas A. Developmental apraxia 45. Li T, Hua XY, Zheng MX, Wang WW, Xu JG, arising from neonatal brachial plexus palsy. 30. Zhang JM, Donnelly DF, Song XJ, LaMotte RH. Gu YD, et al. Different cerebral plasticity of Neurology. 2000;55:24-30. Axotomy increases the excitability of dorsal root intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscles after pe- ganglion cells with unmyelinated axons. ripheral neurotization in a patient with brachial 16. Vredeveld JW, Blaauw G, Slooff BA, Richards R, J Neurophysiol. 1997;78:2790-2794. plexus injury: a TMS and fMRI Study. Neurosci Rozeman SC. The findings in paediatric obstetric Lett. 2015;604:140-144. brachial palsy differ from those in older patients: 31. Lundborg G. Nerve injury and repair - a chal- a suggested explanation. Dev Med Child Neurol. lenge to the plastic brain. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 46. Feng JT, Liu HQ, Xu JG, Gu YD, Shen YD. Dif- 2000;42:158-161. 2003;8:209-226. ferences in brain adaptive functional reorgani- zation in right and left total brachial plexus 17. Hesselmans LF, Jennekens FG, Van den Oord CJ, 32. Lundborg G, Rosen B. Hand function after nerve injury patients. World Neurosurg. 2015;84:702-708. Veldman H, Vincent A. Development of inner- repair. Acta Physiol. 2007;189:207-217. vation of skeletal muscle fibers in man: relation 47. Auer T, Pinter S, Kovacs N, Kalmar Z, Nagy F, to acetylcholine receptors. Anat Record. 1993;236: 33. Florence SL, Hackett TA, Strata F. Thalamic and Horvath RA, et al. Does obstetric brachial plexus 553-562. cortical contributions to neural plasticity injury influence speech dominance? Ann Neurol. after limb amputation. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83: 2009;65:57-66. 18. Colon AJ, Vredeveld JW, Blaauw G. Motor evoked 3154-3159. potentials after transcranial magnetic stimula- 48. Quartarone A, Siebner HR, Rothwell JC. Task- tion support hypothesis of coexisting central 34. Jain N, Florence SL, Qi HX, Kaas JH. Growth of specific hand dystonia: can too much plasticity mechanism in obstetric brachial palsy. JClin new brainstem connections in adult monkeys be bad for you? Trend Neurosci. 2006;29:192-199. Neurophysiol. 2007;24:48-51. with massive sensory loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:5546-5550. 49. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, 19. Cage TA, Simon NG, Bourque S, Noss R, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, et al. Phantom-limb pain Engstrom JW, Ralph JW, et al. Dual reinnerva- 35. Segal M, Sandberg D. Analgesia produced by as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganiza- tion of biceps muscle after side-to-side anasto- electrical-stimulation of catecholamine nuclei in tion following arm amputation. Nature. 1995;375: mosis of an intact median nerve and a damaged rat-brain. Brain Res. 1977;123:369-372. 482-484. musculocutaneous nerve. J Neurosurg. 2013;119: 929-933. 36. Anand P, Birch R. Restoration of sensory func- 50. Knecht S, Henningsen H, Elbert T, Flor H, tion and lack of longterm chronic pain syn- Höhling C, Pantev C, et al. Reorganizational and 20. Melzack R, Katz J. Pain. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn dromes after brachial plexus injury in human perceptional changes after amputation. Brain. Sci. 2013;4:1-15. neonates. Brain. 2002;125:113-122. 1996;119(Pt 4):1213-1219.

330 www.SCIENCEDIRECT.com WORLD NEUROSURGERY, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.027 LITERATURE REVIEWS NEIL G. SIMON ET AL. RECOVERY FROM BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

51. Malessy MJ, van der Kamp W, Thomeer RT, van 68. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, 81. Gomez-Pinilla F, Ying Z, Roy RR, Molteni R, Dijk JG. Cortical excitability of the biceps muscle Dettmers C, Taub E, et al. Motor cortex plasticity Edgerton VR. Voluntary exercise induces a after intercostal-to-musculocutaneous nerve during constraint-induced movement therapy in BDNF-mediated mechanism that promotes neu- transfer. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:787-794. discus- stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998;250:5-8. roplasticity. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:2187-2195. sion 794e785. 69. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, 82. Ying Z, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, Gomez-Pinilla F. 52. Scott KR, Ahmed A, Scott L, Kothari MJ. Reha- Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical Voluntary exercise increases neurotrophin-3 and bilitation of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. its receptor TrkC in the spinal cord. Brain Res. disorders. Handbook Clin Neurol. 2013;110:499-514. 2000;31:1210-1216. 2003;987:93-99.

53. Smania N, Berto G, La Marchina E, Melotti C, 70. Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, Bushara KO, 83. Perreau VM, Adlard PA, Anderson AJ, Midiri A, Roncari L, et al. Rehabilitation of Eckloff S, Croarkin E, et al. Constraint-induced Cotman CW. Exercise-induced gene expression brachial plexus injuries in adults and children. therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor changes in the rat spinal cord. Gene Expr. 2005;12: Eur J Phys Rehab Med. 2012;48:483-506. maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural 107-121. Repair. 2003;17:48-57. 54. Gordon T, English AW. Strategies to promote 84. van Meeteren NL, Brakkee JH, Hamers FP, peripheral nerve regeneration: electrical stimu- 71. Sawaki L, Butler AJ, Leng X, Wassenaar PA, Helders PJ, Gispen WH. Exercise training lation and/or exercise [e-pub ahead of print]. Eur Mohammad YM, Blanton S, et al. Constraint- improves functional recovery and motor nerve J Neurosci, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn. induced movement therapy results in increased conduction velocity after sciatic nerve crush 13005. motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after in the rat. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78: stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:505-513. 70-77. 55. Udina E, Cobianchi S, Allodi I, Navarro X. Effects of activity-dependent strategies on regeneration 72. Sawaki L, Butler AJ, Leng X, Wassenaar PA, 85. van Meeteren NL, Brakkee JH, Helders PJ, and plasticity after peripheral nerve injuries. Ann Mohammad YM, Blanton S, et al. Differential Gispen WH. The effect of exercise training on Anat. 2011;193:347-353. patterns of cortical reorganization following functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush in constraint-induced movement therapy during the rat. J Peripheral Nerv Syst. 1998;3:277-282. 56. Parry CB, Salter M. Sensory re-education after early and late period after stroke: A preliminary median nerve lesions. The Hand. 1976;8:250-257. study. Neurorehabilitation. 2014;35:415-426. 86. Sabatier MJ, Redmon N, Schwartz G, English AW. Treadmill training promotes axon 57. Wynn Parry CB. Rehabilitation of the Hand. 2nd ed. 73. Buesch FE, Schlaepfer B, de Bruin ED, regeneration in injured peripheral nerves. Exp London: Butterworths; 1966. Wohlrab G, Ammann-Reiffer C, Meyer-Heim A. Neurol. 2008;211:489-493. Constraint-induced movement therapy for 58. Dellon AL, Curtis RM, Edgerton MT. Reeduca- children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy: 87. Asensio-Pinilla E, Udina E, Jaramillo J, tion of sensation in the hand after nerve injury two single-case series. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010;33: Navarro X. Electrical stimulation combined and repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;53:297-305. 187-192. with exercise increase axonal regeneration after peripheral nerve injury. Exp Neurol. 2009; 59. Bach-y-Rita P. Brain Mechanisms in Sensory Substi- 74. Vaz DV, Mancini MC, do Amaral MF, de Brito 219:258-265. tution. New York and London: Academic Press; Brandao M, de Franca Drummond A, da 1972. Fonseca ST. Clinical changes during an inter- 88. English AW, Cucoranu D, Mulligan A, vention based on constraint-induced movement Sabatier M. Treadmill training enhances axon 60. Navarro X. Chapter 27: Neural plasticity after therapy principles on use of the affected arm of a regeneration in injured mouse peripheral nerves nerve injury and regeneration. Int Rev Neurobiol. child with obstetric brachial plexus injury: a case without increased loss of topographic specificity. 2009;87:483-505. report. Occup Ther Int. 2010;17:159-167. J Comp Neurol. 2009;517:245-255.

61. Miller LK, Chester R, Jerosch-Herold C. Effects 75. Santamato A, Panza F, Ranieri M, Fiore P. Effect 89. Blinzinger K, Kreutzberg G. Displacement of of sensory reeducation programs on functional of botulinum toxin type A and modified synaptic terminals from regenerating motoneu- hand sensibility after median and ulnar repair: a constraint-induced movement therapy on motor rons by microglial cells. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2012;25:297-306. function of upper limb in children with obstet- 1968;85:145-157. quiz 307. rical brachial plexus palsy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011; 27:2187-2192. 90. Sumner BE, Sutherland FI. Quantitative electron 62. Oud T, Beelen A, Eijffinger E, Nollet F. Sensory microscopy on the injured hypoglossal nucleus re-education after nerve injury of the upper limb: 76. Berggren J, Baker LL. Therapeutic application of in the rat. J Neurocytol. 1973;2:315-328. a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:483-494. electrical stimulation and constraint induced movement therapy in perinatal brachial plexus 91. Cull RE. Role of nerve-muscle contact in main- 63. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, injury: a case report. J Hand Ther. 2015;28:217- taining synaptic connections. Exp Brain Res. 1974; Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy 220. quiz 221. 20:307-310. after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:224-234. 77. Crockett JL, Edgerton VR. Exercise and restricted 92. Chen DH. Qualitative and quantitative study of 64. Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. activity effects on reinnervated and cross- synaptic displacement in chromatolyzed spinal Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper innervated skeletal muscles. J Neurol Sci. 1975; motoneurons of the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1978;177: extremities in stroke patients. Cochrane Database 25:1-9. 635-664. Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD004433. 78. Badke A, Irintchev AP, Wernig A. Maturation of 93. Udina E, Puigdemasa A, Navarro X. Passive and 65. Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ. Effect of deaf- transmission in reinnervated mouse soleus active exercise improve regeneration and muscle ferentation on a conditioned avoidance muscle. Muscle Nerve. 1989;12:580-586. reinnervation after peripheral nerve injury in the response. Science. 1958;128:842-843. rat. Muscle Nerve. 2011;43:500-509. 79. Soucy M, Seburn K, Gardiner P. Is increased 66. Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ. Movements in voluntary motor activity beneficial or 94. Boeltz T, Ireland M, Mathis K, Nicolini J, monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol. detrimental during the period of motor nerve Poplavski K, Rose SJ, et al. Effects of treadmill 1963;7:305-315. regeneration/reinnervation? Can J Appl Physiol. training on functional recovery following pe- 1996;21:218-224. ripheral nerve injury in rats. J Neurophysiol. 2013; 67. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint- 109:2645-2657. induced movement therapy: a new family of 80. Gomez-Pinilla F, Ying Z, Opazo P, Roy RR, techniques with broad application to physical Edgerton VR. Differential regulation by exercise 95. Wood K, Wilhelm JC, Sabatier MJ, Liu K, Gu J, rehabilitationea clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. of BDNF and NT-3 in rat spinal cord and skeletal English AW. Sex differences in the effectiveness 1999;36:237-251. muscle. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13:1078-1084. of treadmill training in enhancing axon

WORLD NEUROSURGERY 85: 325-332, JANUARY 2016 www.WORLDNEUROSURGERY.org 331 LITERATURE REVIEWS NEIL G. SIMON ET AL. RECOVERY FROM BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

regeneration in injured peripheral nerves. Dev 102. Pockett S, Gavin RM. Acceleration of peripheral 110. Franz CK, Singh B, Martinez JA, Zochodne DW, Neurobiol. 2012;72:688-698. nerve regeneration after crush injury in rat. Midha R. Brief transvertebral electrical stimula- Neurosci Lett. 1985;59:221-224. tion of the spinal cord improves the specificity of 96. Thompson NJ, Sengelaub DR, English AW. femoral nerve reinnervation. Neurorehabil Neural Enhancement of peripheral nerve regeneration 103. Gordon T, Amirjani N, Edwards DC, Chan KM. Repair. 2013;27:260-268. due to treadmill training and electrical stimula- Brief post-surgical electrical stimulation acceler- tion is dependent on androgen receptor ates axon regeneration and muscle reinnervation 111. Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC. Differences between signaling. Dev Neurobiol. 2014;74:531-540. without affecting the functional measures in the effects of three plasticity inducing protocols patients. Exp Neurol. on the organization of the human motor cortex. 97. English AW, Cucoranu D, Mulligan A, 2010;223:192-202. Rodriguez JA, Sabatier MJ. Neurotrophin-4/5 is Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:822-829. implicated in the enhancement of axon regen- 104. Wong JN, Olson JL, Morhart MJ, Chan KM. eration produced by treadmill training following Electrical stimulation enhances sensory recovery: 112. Zhivolupov SA, Odinak MM, Rashidov NA, peripheral nerve injury. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2015; Onischenko LS, Samartsev IN, Jurin AA. Impulse 2265-2271. 77:996-1006. magnetic stimulation facilitates synaptic regen- eration in rats following sciatic nerve injury. 98. Wilhelm JC, Xu M, Cucoranu D, Chmielewski S, 105. Brushart TM. Nerve Repair. New York: Oxford Neural Regen Res. 2012;7:1299-1303. Holmes T, Lau KS, et al. Cooperative roles of University Press; 2011:353-373. BDNF expression in neurons and Schwann cells are modulated by exercise to facilitate nerve 113. Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ahdab R, Ciampi de 106. Brannstrom T, Kellerth JO. Recovery of synapses regeneration. J Neurosci. 2012;32:5002-5009. Andrade D, Fregni F, Khedr EM, et al. The use of in axotomized adult cat spinal motoneurons after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation 99. Al-Majed AA, Brushart TM, Gordon T. Electrical reinnervation into muscle. Exp Brain Res. 1999; (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimula- stimulation accelerates and increases expression 125:19-27. tion (tDCS) to relieve pain. Brain Stimul. 2008;1: of BDNF and trkB mRNA in regenerating rat 337-344. femoral motoneurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12: 107. Nguyen QT, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. Pre-existing 4381-4390. pathways promote precise projection patterns. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:861-867. Received 12 August 2015; accepted 15 September 2015 100. Al-Majed AA, Neumann CM, Brushart TM, Citation: World Neurosurg. (2016) 85:325-332. Gordon T. Brief electrical stimulation promotes 108. Scott JJA, Panesar G. Small-signal sensitivity of http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.027 the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regen- muscle-spindles reinnervated after long-term eration. J Neurosci. 2000;20:2602-2608. denervation. Brain Res. 1995;671:325-328. Journal homepage: www.WORLDNEUROSURGERY.org Available online: www.sciencedirect.com 101. Nix WA, Hopf HC. Electrical stimulation of 109. Cope TC, Bonasera SJ, Nichols TR. Reinnervated regenerating nerve and its effect on motor muscles fail to produce stretch reflexes. 1878-8750/$ - see front matter ª 2016 Elsevier Inc. recovery. Brain research. 1983;272:21-25. J Neurophysiol. 1994;71:817-820. All rights reserved.

332 www.SCIENCEDIRECT.com WORLD NEUROSURGERY, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.027