DOCSLIB.ORG

The Following Independent Countries Are GSP-Eligible Beneficiaries (Bdcs)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Following Independent Countries Are GSP-Eligible Beneficiaries (Bdcs) INFORMATION ON COUNTRIES ELIGIBLE FOR GSP GSP-Eligible Beneficiaries Independent countries The following independent countries are GSP-eligible beneficiaries (BDCs): Afghanistan Gabon Papua New Guinea Albania Gambia, The Paraguay Algeria Georgia Philippines Angola Ghana Russia Argentina Grenada Rwanda Azerbaijan Guinea St. Kitts and Nevis Armenia Guinea-Bissau Saint Lucia Bangladesh Guyana Saint Vincent and Belize Haiti the Grenadines Benin India Samoa Bhutan Indonesia Sao Tomé and Principe Bolivia Iraq Senegal Bosnia and Hercegovina Jamaica Serbia and Montenegro Botswana Jordan Seychelles Brazil Kazakhstan Sierra Leone Burkina Faso Kenya Solomon Islands Burundi Kiribati Somalia Cambodia Kosovo South Africa Cameroon Kyrgyzstan Sri Lanka Cape Verde Lebanon Suriname Central African Republic Lesotho Swaziland Chad Liberia Tanzania Colombia Macedonia, Former Thailand Comoros Yugoslav Republic of Togo Congo (Brazzaville) Madagascar Tonga Congo (Kinshasa) Malawi Trinidad and Tobago Costa Rica Mali Tunisia Côte d'Ivoire Mauritania Turkey Croatia Mauritius Tuvalu Djibouti Moldova Uganda Dominica Mongolia Ukraine Dominican Republic Mozambique Uruguay East Timor Namibia Uzbekistan Ecuador Nepal Vanuatu Egypt Niger Venezuela Equatorial Guinea Nigeria Republic of Yemen Eritrea Oman Zambia Ethiopia Pakistan Zimbabwe Fiji Panama Non-independent countries and territories The following non-independent countries and territories are GSP-eligible beneficiaries: Anguilla Falkland Islands Pitcairn Islands British Indian Ocean (Islas Malvinas) Saint Helena Territory Gibraltar Tokelau Christmas Island Heard Island and Turks and Caicos Islands (Australia) McDonald Islands Virgin Islands, British Cocos (Keeling) Montserrat Wallis and Futuna Islands Niue West Bank and Gaza Cook Islands Norfolk Island Strip Western Sahara Least-developed beneficiary developing countries The least developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs) are as follows: Afghanistan Equatorial Guinea Rwanda Angola Ethiopia Samoa Bangladesh Gambia, The Sao Tomé and Benin Guinea Principe Bhutan Guinea-Bissau Sierra Leone Burkina Faso Haiti Solomon Islands Burundi Kiribati Somalia Cambodia Lesotho Tanzania Cape Verde Liberia Togo Central African Madagascar Tuvalu Republic Malawi Uganda Chad Mali Vanuatu Comoros Mauritania Republic of Yemen Congo (Kinshasa) Mozambique Zambia Djibouti Nepal East Timor Niger Associations of countries (treated as one country for GSP rule-of-origin requirements) Member Countries Qualifying Member of the Cartagena Countries of the Agreement South Asian Association (Andean Group) for Regional Cooperation Bolivia (SAARC) Colombia Afghanistan Ecuador Bangladesh Venezuela Bhutan India Member Countries Nepal of the West African Pakistan Economic and Monetary Sri Lanka Union (WAEMU) Benin Qualifying Member Burkina Faso Countries Côte d'Ivoire of the Southern Africa Guinea-Bissau Development Community Mali (SADC) Niger Botswana Senegal Mauritius Togo Tanzania Qualifying Member Qualifying Member Countries of Countries the Association of of the Caribbean Common South East Asian Market (CARICOM), Nations (ASEAN) Belize Cambodia Dominica Indonesia Grenada Philippines Guyana Thailand Jamaica Montserrat St. Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISSAP Madagascar Pond Heron
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme 15 th MEETING OF THE CMS SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Rome, Italy, 27-28 November 2008 UNEP/CMS/ScC15/Doc.6 DRAFT INTERNATIONAL SINGLE SPECIES ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE MADAGASCAR POND HERON ARDEOLA IDAE (Introductory note prepared by the Secretariat) 1. The Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Madagascar Pond Heron Ardeola idae was initiated jointly by CMS and AEWA in 2007 upon a recommendation of the 14 th Meeting of the CMS Scientific Council. 2. The plan covers the entire range of this intra-African migrant. The drafting of the Plan was commissioned to the BirdLife International Africa Partnership Secretariat with financial support provided by the Ministry of Environment of Italy and was compiled by a team under the management of Paul Kariuki Ndang’ang’a. Earlier drafts of the Plan have been consulted extensively with experts and governmental officials at the Range States. 3. The Plan has already been adopted by the 4 th Meeting of the Parties to AEWA (Antananarivo, Madagascar, 15-19 September 2008). Action requested: The Scientific Council is requested to: a. review and endorse the Plan; and b. transmit the Plan to the Conference of the Parties for adoption. For reasons of economy, documents are printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/CMS concerning the legal status of any State, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers and boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Absolute Temperature, 60 Acalapa Dome, 256
    INDEX 1 A alignment(s), fold, 307 absolute temperature, 60 regional strike, 121 positive, 127, 239 Acalapa dome, 256 Alloz diapir area, 286 resistivity, 138 acceleration of gravity, model ratio of, Almere deposits, 271 seismic, 298 14 Alpine geosyncline, Briangonnais structural, 99, 136 accumulation(s) of oil, stratigraphic, platform of, 335 Anoz diapir, stages of diapirism, 289 122 alpine orogenic belt, California, 238 Anoz diapir area, 286 of oil or gas, 109 Alpine orogeny, 300 thickness of middle Eocene, 289 Achotal structure, 254 alpine-type peridotites, 238 Anoz to Salinas de Oro diapir, acoustic-velocity values of shale, 137 Alps, “nappes” of the, 89 cross section, 289 activation, entropy of, 60 alteration, hydrothermal, 238 anticlinal diapirs, 4 free energy of, 60 alteration of anhydrite, 116 folding, 156, 168, 296 thermal, 60 Amadeus basin, diapiric structures of, salt masses, 121 activation energy, 60 301, 313 structures, 84 -temperature curves, 66 salt diapirs of, 3 Gulf province, 100 of “climb” process, 65 ambiguity, shape, 124 anticline, Cornwall, 188 of dislocation source, 65 Amexquite dome, cap rock, 258 Sierra de Minas Viejas, 11 Adelaide-Cambrian systemic bound­ ammonites, 247, 249 anticlines, diapiric, 5 ary, 304 amplitude, reflection, 134, 135 interdomal, 110 geosyncline, 302 Amund Ringnes Island, 188 relict, 110 diapirism in, 307 Anahuac sedimentary inclusions, 24 residual, 110 diapirism outside of, 313 Anahuacian, Hcterostcgina zone of, rim, 110 pattern of folding, 306 110 salt, origin of, 225 stratigraphy, 304 andesine,
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
    [Show full text]
  • THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC and Small Arms Survey by Eric G
    SMALL ARMS: A REGIONAL TINDERBOX A REGIONAL ARMS: SMALL AND REPUBLIC AFRICAN THE CENTRAL Small Arms Survey By Eric G. Berman with Louisa N. Lombard Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland p +41 22 908 5777 f +41 22 732 2738 e [email protected] w www.smallarmssurvey.org THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC AND SMALL ARMS A REGIONAL TINDERBOX ‘ The Central African Republic and Small Arms is the most thorough and carefully researched G. Eric By Berman with Louisa N. Lombard report on the volume, origins, and distribution of small arms in any African state. But it goes beyond the focus on small arms. It also provides a much-needed backdrop to the complicated political convulsions that have transformed CAR into a regional tinderbox. There is no better source for anyone interested in putting the ongoing crisis in its proper context.’ —Dr René Lemarchand Emeritus Professor, University of Florida and author of The Dynamics of Violence in Central Africa ’The Central African Republic, surrounded by warring parties in Sudan, Chad, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, lies on the fault line between the international community’s commitment to disarmament and the tendency for African conflicts to draw in their neighbours. The Central African Republic and Small Arms unlocks the secrets of the breakdown of state capacity in a little-known but pivotal state in the heart of Africa. It also offers important new insight to options for policy-makers and concerned organizations to promote peace in complex situations.’ —Professor William Reno Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Political Science, Northwestern University Photo: A mutineer during the military unrest of May 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • Timor-Leste's Growing Engagement with the Pacific Islands Region
    110 Regionalism, Security & Cooperation in Oceania Chapter 8 Acting West, Looking East: Timor-Leste’s Growing Engagement with the Pacific Islands Region Jose Kai Lekke Sousa-Santos Executive Summary • Timor-Leste is situated geopolitically and culturally at the crossroads of Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands region, and has pursued a two-pil- lared neighborhood foreign policy of “comprehensive and collective en- gagement,” which is defined by “Acting West” and “Looking East.” • Timor-Leste is seeking to integrate itself within regional governance and security structures, and institutions of both Southeast Asia and the Pa- cific Islands, thereby increasing its strategic role as a conduit for cooper- ation and collaboration between the two regions. • Timor-Leste is of increasing geostrategic importance to the Asia Pacific in view of the growing focus on the Pacific Ocean in terms of resource security and the growing competition between China and the United States. • Timor-Leste could play an increasingly significant role in regional de- fense diplomacy developments if the Melanesian Spearhead Group re- gional peacekeeping force is realized. Timor-Leste’s Engagement with the Pacific Islands Region - Santos 111 “We may be a small nation, but we are part of our inter- connected region. Our nation shares an island with Indone- sia. We are part of the fabric of Southeast Asia. And we are on the cross road of Asia and the Pacific.” 1 - Xanana Kay Rala Gusmao Introduction Timor-Leste is situated geopolitically and culturally on the crossroads of Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands region and has, since achieving in- dependence in 2002, pursued a two-pillared neighborhood foreign policy of ‘Acting West’ and ‘Looking East.’ Timor-Leste claims that its geographic position secures the “half-island” state as an integral and categorical part of Southeast Asia while at the same time, acknowledging the clear links it shares with its Pacific Island neighbors to the west, particularly in the areas of development and security.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Overseas Territories
    INFORMATION PAPER United Kingdom Overseas Territories - Toponymic Information United Kingdom Overseas Territories (UKOTs), also known as British Overseas Territories (BOTs), have constitutional and historical links with the United Kingdom, but do not form part of the United Kingdom itself. The Queen is the Head of State of all the UKOTs, and she is represented by a Governor or Commissioner (apart from the UK Sovereign Base Areas that are administered by MOD). Each Territory has its own Constitution, its own Government and its own local laws. The 14 territories are: Anguilla; Bermuda; British Antarctic Territory (BAT); British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT); British Virgin Islands; Cayman Islands; Falkland Islands; Gibraltar; Montserrat; Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands; Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands; Turks and Caicos Islands; UK Sovereign Base Areas. PCGN recommend the term ‘British Overseas Territory Capital’ for the administrative centres of UKOTs. Production of mapping over the UKOTs does not take place systematically in the UK. Maps produced by the relevant territory, preferably by official bodies such as the local government or tourism authority, should be used for current geographical names. National government websites could also be used as an additional reference. Additionally, FCDO and MOD briefing maps may be used as a source for names in UKOTs. See the FCDO White Paper for more information about the UKOTs. ANGUILLA The territory, situated in the Caribbean, consists of the main island of Anguilla plus some smaller, mostly uninhabited islands. It is separated from the island of Saint Martin (split between Saint-Martin (France) and Sint Maarten (Netherlands)), 17km to the south, by the Anguilla Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cayman Islands
    Funding Support through OTEP for UNITED KINGDOM Environmental Programmes in the UK Overseas Territories CAYMAN ISLANDS he Overseas Territories Environment NVIRONMENT HARTER OTEPOVERSEAS TERRITORIES ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME Programme (OTEP) was established to E C enable the Governments of the UK and the A PARTNERSHIP FOR CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE TOverseas Territories to meet their commitments under the Environment Charters. In 1999, the year of the OF CAYMAN’S ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES White Paper, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) made available an annual funding programme t is a little-known fact that many of the United for environmental projects in the UKOTs. And in 2003, Kingdom’s most significant biodiversity the British Government worked together with Territory Cayman boasts two endemic subspecies of the Cuban Parrot, this one from Grand Cayman and resources are not in the British Isles themselves. Governments and non-governmental organisations to one from Cayman Brac. IThey are to be found in the UK Overseas Territories develop OTEP, a new ring-fenced fund which supports (UKOTs), former colonies and territories scattered environmental projects in the UKOTs. OTEP is a joint initiative of the FCO and the Department for around the world. Endemic species – those which International Development (DFID) which aims to build on the success of earlier FCO-funded occur in only one place in the world – are critically programmes. Bids may be submitted by Overseas Territories governments; NGOs; community-based important to the planet’s overall biodiversity, and organisations; individuals; educational institutions; private sector. Bids may also be submitted by UK- the UKOTs have at least ten times as many endemic based organisations, NGOs and academic institutions if they have been developed in collaboration with species as Britain itself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands Hotspot Ecosystem Profile Summary
    The Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands Hotspot Ecosystem Profile Summary 1 About CEPF Established in 2000, the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a global leader in enabling civil society to participate in and influence the conservation of some of the world’s most critical ecosystems. CEPF is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement (AFD), Conservation International, the European Union, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Government of Japan, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. CEPF is unique among funding mechanisms in that it focuses on high-priority biological areas rather than political boundaries and examines conservation threats on a landscape scale. From this perspective, CEPF seeks to identify and support a regional, rather than a national, approach to achieving conservation outcomes and engages a wide range of public and private institutions to address conservation needs through coordinated regional efforts. CEPF’s first phase of investment in this hotspot ran from 2001 to 2006 and totaled US$4.25 million. A consolidation phase of US$1.4 million followed, though it was delayed due to the country’s political situation and ran from 2009 to 2012. CEPF’s investments achieved significant results, particularly by helping to establish more than 1 million hectares of new protected areas, improving the livelihoods of communities near several protected areas, and by developing a direct link between improving livelihoods and preserving biodiversity. CEPF’s support enabled the participation of a broad range of stakeholders—many of whom had never had the opportunity to operate independently—and also enabled more well-known organizations to take risks to undertake conservation efforts with uncertain outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar 2012
    Madagascar 2012 www.africaneconomicoutlook.org Madagascar The political crisis continued to affect Madagascar economically and socially in 2011 and gross domestic product (GDP) grew by a weak 0.6%. It should grow faster in 2012, by 2.4%, and in 2013, by 4.5%. The political crisis also slowed (and in some cases stopped) most public sector reforms. However, the budget deficit was contained at 1.3% of GDP in 2011 thanks to continuing spending austerity and should remain steady in 2012. Youth employment remains a big problem, with 5.9% of under-25s out of work, compared with an overall rate of 3.8%. Urban youths were more affected (8.9%) than those in the countryside (3.9%) but these low figures hide a rate of under-employment which is more explosive. The country has a national job support programme but the current political and institutional instability has prevented it from achieving its goals. Overview The political crisis continued in 2011, affecting the economy and society. Higher oil and food prices and poor rainfall also played their part and real GDP rose by only 0.6%, barely more than the 0.5% in 2010. The economy should expand, however, by 2.4% in 2012 and 4.5% in 2013, owing to hopes of a solution to the crisis after agreement on a road-map on 17 September 2011 and the strength of the mining sector. But the ongoing economic crisis in the euro area could undermine this momentum with a fall in demand for Madagascan goods and high unemployment in Europe that could reduce exports and affect the tourist industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Military Presence in the Horn of Africa Region
    SIPRI Background Paper April 2019 THE FOREIGN MILITARY SUMMARY w The Horn of Africa is PRESENCE IN THE HORN OF undergoing far-reaching changes in its external security AFRICA REGION environment. A wide variety of international security actors— from Europe, the United States, neil melvin the Middle East, the Gulf, and Asia—are currently operating I. Introduction in the region. As a result, the Horn of Africa has experienced The Horn of Africa region has experienced a substantial increase in the a proliferation of foreign number and size of foreign military deployments since 2001, especially in the military bases and a build-up of 1 past decade (see annexes 1 and 2 for an overview). A wide range of regional naval forces. The external and international security actors are currently operating in the Horn and the militarization of the Horn poses foreign military installations include land-based facilities (e.g. bases, ports, major questions for the future airstrips, training camps, semi-permanent facilities and logistics hubs) and security and stability of the naval forces on permanent or regular deployment.2 The most visible aspect region. of this presence is the proliferation of military facilities in littoral areas along This SIPRI Background the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa.3 However, there has also been a build-up Paper is the first of three papers of naval forces, notably around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, at the entrance to devoted to the new external the Red Sea and in the Gulf of Aden. security politics of the Horn of This SIPRI Background Paper maps the foreign military presence in the Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Commonwealth Countries, British Overseas Territories, British Crown Dependencies and EU Member States
    List of Commonwealth countries, British Overseas Territories, British Crown Dependencies and EU member states Commonwealth countries1 Antigua and Barbuda Kenya St Vincent and the Grenadines Australia Kiribati Samoa The Bahamas Lesotho Seychelles Bangladesh Malawi Sierra Leone Barbados Malaysia Singapore Belize Malta* Solomon Islands Botswana Mauritius South Africa Brunei Mozambique Sri Lanka Cameroon Namibia Swaziland Canada Nauru Tonga Dominica New Zealand Trinidad and Tobago Fiji Nigeria Tuvalu Ghana Pakistan Uganda Grenada Papua New Guinea United Kingdom* Guyana Republic of Cyprus* United Republic of Tanzania India Rwanda Vanuatu Jamaica St Christopher and Nevis Zambia St Lucia Zimbabwe *Although also EU member states, citizens of the UK, Cyprus and Malta are eligible to be registered to vote in respect of all elections held in the UK. 1 Citizens of Commonwealth countries that have been suspended from the Commonwealth retain their voting rights. Their voting rights would only be affected if their country was also deleted from the list of Commonwealth countries in the British Nationality Act 1981 through an Act of the UK Parliament. British Overseas Territories Anguilla Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands Bermuda St Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha British Antarctic Territory South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands British Indian Ocean Territory Sovereign Base areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia on Cyprus Cayman Islands Falkland Islands Turks and Caicos Islands Gibraltar Virgin Islands Montserrat British Crown Dependencies
    [Show full text]