DOCSLIB.ORG

Paleo Indians

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paleo Indians Paleo Indians The Paleo Indians were the first human beings in Georgia. There is evidence that they were in the state as early as 13,250 years ago, and they are often dated from 12,000-8,000 BCE. They were nomadic hunters and gatherers who followed large game such as mastodons and giant bison. Once these large animals (often called “Megafauna”) disappeared, the Paleo Indians began hunting smaller game, such as deer. The primary weapon they used was spears made of wood and stone or flint. These spear points are often called “Clovis” points after the town in New Mexico where they were initially discovered. Paleo homes were made out of animal skins, which allowed the Paleo Indians to easily move from place to place as they hunted. Artifacts produced by this group have been found throughout all five regions of Georgia. It should be noted that students often find it interesting that the word “Paleo” means “very old,” and this factoid often helps them remember that this group was the first Native American culture in Georgia. For more information about the Paleo Indian Period see: The New Georgia Encyclopedia: “Paleoindian Period: Overview” http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-810&hl=y Archaic Indians The next prehistoric culture who lived in the state was the Archaic Indians (8,000 BCE- 1,000 BCE). This group descended from of the Paleo Indians, and they developed new technological tools due to their rapidly changing environment. The Archaic Indians were also nomadic, but they made several technological advancements, including the atlatl that allowed spears to be thrown at a high rate of speed. In addition, they invented other tools such as the grooved axe and pottery. They also made hooks and nets for fishing. This group is often divided into three distinct periods: Early, Middle, and Late. Similarly to the word “Paleo,” “Archaic means “old.” For more information about the Archaic Indian Period see: The New Georgia Encyclopedia: “Archaic Period: Overview” http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-580 Woodland Indians The third prehistoric Native American culture was the Woodland Indians (1000 BCE-750 CE). This culture is also credited for technological advancements, including the use of the bow and arrow for hunting, and pottery for storage. This group is credited for being the first to rely on horticulture and farming as a major source of food. The Woodland Indians began to live in small villages with homes made of wood, leaves, and bark. Students should be told that this group depended on corn and that it was they, not the Mississippian Indians, who were the first mound builders. For more information about the Woodland Indian Period see: The New Georgia Encyclopedia: “Woodland Period: Overview” http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-811&sug=y Mississippian Indians The last Prehistoric Native American culture was the Mississippian Indians (800 CE-1600 CE). This group is considered to be the most “complex” prehistoric culture in Georgia. They were large scale farmers and mound builders who traded extensively throughout North America. The Mississippian society was organized as a “chiefdom” society, or a structured hierarchical society with a small number of “elites” and the majority who were “commoners.” The “chief” held almost all of the power in the village. The people of the period lived in large “mound towns.” This group was the first to encounter Europeans, such as Spanish explorer Hernando de Soto, whose army starved thousands of Mississippian Indians, and killed many others outright. However, this culture ultimately ended due to the impact of diseases that were brought to the region by the Europeans. Some experts argue that another factor for the end of the Mississippian Indians was a desire by these peoples to be closer to European centers for trade which broke up large villages. Remnants of the Mississippian Indian tribes went on to form modern tribes such as the Creek and Cherokee. For more information about the Mississippian Indian Period see: The New Georgia Encyclopedia: “Mississippian Period: Overview” http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-707, .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio History Lesson 1
    http://www.touring-ohio.com/ohio-history.html http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/category.php?c=PH http://www.oplin.org/famousohioans/indians/links.html Benchmark • Describe the cultural patterns that are visible in North America today as a result of exploration, colonization & conflict Grade Level Indicator • Describe, the earliest settlements in Ohio including those of prehistoric peoples The students will be able to recognize and describe characteristics of the earliest settlers Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleo-indians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Bering Strait Stone Age Shawnee Paleo-Indian People Catfish •Pre-Clovis Culture Cave Art •Clovis Culture •Plano Culture Paleo-Indian People • First to come to North America • “Paleo” means “Ancient” • Paleo-Indians • Hunted huge wild animals for food • Gathered seeds, nuts and roots. • Used bone needles to sew animal hides • Used flint to make tools and weapons • Left after the Ice Age-disappeared from Ohio Archaic People Archaic People • Early/Middle Archaic Period • Late Archaic Period • Glacial Kame/Red Ocher Cultures Archaic People • Archaic means very old (2nd Ohio group) • Stone tools to chop down trees • Canoes from dugout trees • Archaic Indians were hunters: deer, wild turkeys, bears, ducks and geese • Antlers to hunt • All parts of the animal were used • Nets to fish
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology of the Funeral Mound, Ocmulgee National Monument, Georgia
    1.2.^5^-3 rK 'rm ' ^ -*m *~ ^-mt\^ -» V-* ^JT T ^T A . ESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE Clemson Universii akCHEOLOGY of the FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA TIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3ERAL JCATK5N r -v-^tfS i> &, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary National Park Service Conrad L. Wirth, Director Ihis publication is one of a series of research studies devoted to specialized topics which have been explored in con- nection with the various areas in the National Park System. It is printed at the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1 (paper cover) ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE National Monument, Georgia By Charles H. Fairbanks with introduction by Frank M. Settler ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • WASHINGTON 1956 THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, of which Ocmulgee National Monument is a unit, is dedi- cated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and his- toric heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Foreword Ocmulgee National Monument stands as a memorial to a way of life practiced in the Southeast over a span of 10,000 years, beginning with the Paleo-Indian hunters and ending with the modern Creeks of the 19th century. Here modern exhibits in the monument museum will enable you to view the panorama of aboriginal development, and here you can enter the restoration of an actual earth lodge and stand where forgotten ceremonies of a great tribe were held.
    [Show full text]
  • Cahokia Mounds – Largest Archaeological Site in North America
    Cahokia Mounds – Largest Archaeological Site in North America Preserving the remains of an ancient Native American city near Collinsville, Illinois, the Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site is across the Mississippi River from St. Louis, Missouri. Covering more than 2,000 acres, Cahokia is the most sophisticated prehistoric Native civilization north of Mexico. Best known for large, man-made earthen structures, the city of Cahokia was inhabited from about A.D. 700 to 1400. Built by ancient peoples known as the Mound Builders, Cahokia’s original population was thought to have been only about 1,000 until about the 11th century when it expanded to tens of thousands. At its peak from 1,100 to 1,200 A.D., the city covered nearly six square miles and boasted a population of as many as 100,000 people. Houses were arranged in rows around open plazas. Agricultural fields and a number of smaller villages surrounded and supplied the city. The Cahokians were known to have traded with other tribes as far away as Minnesota. The original name of the city is unknown and the inhabitants apparently never utilized writing skills. The name Cahokia is that of a unrelated tribe that was living in the area when the first French explorers arrived in the late 17th century. These ancient Indians built more than 120 earthen mounds in the city, 109 of which have been recorded and 68 of which are preserved within the site. Many others are thought to have been altered or destroyed by farming and construction. While some are no more than a gentle rise on the land, others reach 100 feet into the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Anasazi (Pueblo Builders and Cliff Dwellers) Mound Builders
    CK_3_TH_HG_P146_194.QXD 4/11/05 10:47 AM Page 153 Some of the Inuit of today live very much the way their ancestors did. For food, clothing, weapons, tools, and fuel, they rely on the fish they catch and the caribou, seals, whales, and walruses they hunt. In winter, the Inuit live in houses made of sod, wood, and stone, and in summer, they use tents made of animal skins. Igloos, shelters made of blocks of snow, are used only when the Inuit go on hunts and then only rarely. Kayaks and dog sleds are their means of transportation. Much of the Inuit reli- gion revolves around the sea and animals. The Inuit are noted for their carvings in soapstone, ivory, and bone, which often use characters from their religious lore. Anasazi (Pueblo Builders and Cliff Dwellers) By about 2,000 years ago, the Anasazi had settled in what is known today as the four corners area of the Southwest, that is, where Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah meet. Originally hunters and gatherers, the Anasazi turned to farming by around 1000 CE. Their crops were primarily maize (corn), beans, and squash. The first houses of the Anasazi were pithouses constructed below ground. By 1100 CE, however, the Anasazi were building cliff dwellings, multistoried stone apartment buildings with many rooms, set into mountainsides. By the late 1200s, for unknown reasons, the Anasazi began to abandon their cliff dwellings. Possible reasons include drought, disease, pressure from invading groups like the Apache, and internal dissension among villagers. Archaeologists have found no proof of any of these.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Archaeological Society, Records, 1934-1983, (C0780)
    C Missouri Archaeological Society, Records, 1934-1983 780 10.7 linear feet This collection is available at The State Historical Society of Missouri. If you would like more information, please contact us at [email protected]. INTRODUCTION The records of an organization of amateur and professional archaeologists headquartered in Columbia, Missouri. Includes extensive members’ correspondence, membership lists, executive committee correspondence, annual meeting notes, activities of local chapters, financial records, newspaper clippings, and photographs. This collection documents and illustrates the members’ archaeological interests and the organization’s efforts to protect and preserve the archaeological resources of Missouri. DONOR INFORMATION The records were placed on contract with the University of Missouri by the Missouri Archaeological Society through Carl Chapman on 10 September 1981 (Accession No. 4367). Additions were made on 12 January 1982 (Accession No. 4398); 7 January 1985 and 5 February 1985 (Accession No. 4609); and 3 April 1986 (Accession No. 4708). ORGANIZATIONAL SKETCH In 1930 Bagnell Dam was completed and Missouri’s Lake of the Ozarks was formed. When the waters swept over the area without any sort of archaeological reconnaissance the Indian remains there were lost forever. Shocked by this loss of information, Professors Jesse E. Wrench and J. Brewton Berry of the University of Missouri decided something had to be done. Within a short time they contacted those they knew to be interested in Missouri archaeology and started an archaeological survey of the state, which would utilize amateur archaeologists. These efforts proved so satisfactory that by 1934 the project was funded by the Federal Emergency Relief Administration and involved seventy-five paid workers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fine "Cup" Stone Display at November Aso Show and The
    A FINE "CUP" STONE DISPLAY AT NOVEMBER ASO SHOW AND THE ENIGMA OF A COMMON OHIO ARTIFACT by Michael Rusnak 4642 Friar Road, Stow, OH 44224 [email protected] Two impressive examples of "cup Cup stones were noted in many early suggests "a possible link to hunting, or with stones" were part of an exhibit assembled writings on American and Ohio archaeolo­ the combined activities of a seasonal hunt­ by ASO members Steve Hill and Earnest gy. Often lists of material found in mounds ing/gathering camp." He also relates similar Cook at the November ASO show in Co­ include one or more cup stones amin ong possible uses, including that they "served lumbus. Figures 1-5 show several views the tally of objects unearthed. For exam­ as the base-socket for the fire-drill, with tin­ of the two sizable examples made of ple, Gerald Folke's 1902 book Archaeo­ der piled around the rotating shaft." sandstone. Both of the stones are larger logical History of Ohio: the Mound Build­ than typical field finds and both contained ers and Later Indians describes the great Curiously, as Folke noted —cup stones multiple "cups" or depressions. One stone numbers of cup stones that were found in are found in many areas of Europe as well, has multiple depressions on both sides. Ohio: along with much speculation on their use. One study of pitted river boulders in North­ A common Ohio artifact, such stones They occur in all parts of the world ern Europe by Andreas Tvauri dates many are referred to by several names, some­ and are surpassed in numbers examples to the Bronze Age, and specu­ times called "cup stones," "pitted stones," among the larger stone objects only lates that some may have been hollows for "nutting stones," or "anvil stones" by field pitted stones and hammers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Archeology in Iowa: an Overview
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 82 Number 1 Part 2 Article 8 1975 The Development of Archeology in Iowa: An Overview Duane C. Anderson University of Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1975 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Anderson, Duane C. (1975) "The Development of Archeology in Iowa: An Overview," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 82(1 pt. 2), 71-86. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol82/iss1/8 This General Interest Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Anderson: The Development of Archeology in Iowa: An Overview 71 The Development of Archeology in Iowa: An Overview DUANE C. ANDERSON! This paper traces the development of archeology in Iowa through porary Period, 1951-1975. The Society served as a catalyst for three distinct periods. Workers durin&_ the period of Pioneer In­ amateur-professional interaction as research programs sprang up vestigations, 1870-1920, were preoccupied with the problem of the at various colleges, universities and museums across the state. identity of the "Mound Builders." Through their activities they Since the 1960's there has been a gradual change in research stimulated public awareness and interest and fostered the growth strategy toward the "new" archeology with its emphasis on the of scientific investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Peoples of North America
    How do people adapt to where they live? Compare and Contrast Make and label a Two-tab Foldable book before you read this unit. Label the tabs Hunter-Gatherers and Farming Cultures. Use the Foldable to organize information as you read. The Ancetral Puelbo built their =jciZg"<Vi]ZgZgh homes into the sides of cliffs at Mesa Verde. ;Vgb^c\8jaijgZh For more about Unit 1 go to www.macmillanmh.com Native Peoples OF North America 17 Maya Artifact Navajo Woman Central America Southwest Maya cities arise in Navajo settle in 250 Mexico and Guatemala 1200 the Southwest ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ 200 400 600 800 In about A.D. 250, Maya cities arose in the rain The Navajo people settled in the Southwest forests of Mexico and Central America . in about A.D. 1200. Today you can visit ruins of ancient Maya cities Today the Navajo follow many of their such as Tikal and Chichén Itzá. traditional customs. 18 Unit 1 For more about People, Places, and Events, visit www.macmillanmh.com Mississippian Artifact Iroquois Chief Mississippi River Valley Northeast Cahokia is abandoned Iroquois Confederacy 1300 1451 adopts early constitution ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ 1000 1200 1400 1600 Cahokia , a large city built by Mississippian In 1451 the five nations of the Iroquois Mound Builders , was deserted by about Confederacy adopted the “ Great Law of 1300. Peace,” an early constitution. Today you can see Cahokia’s largest mounds at Today many members of the Confederacy live a park near Collinsville, Illinois. in New York. 19 Lesson 1 Settling the VOCABULARY archaeologist p. 21 glacier p. 21 civilization p.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of Ethnology : [Bulletin]
    ^i SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY: J. W. POWELL, DIRECTOR THE PROBLEM OF THE OHIO MOUNDS BY uOGY 11083 1889 LIBRARY, e^Y^^US THOMAS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 8 S !» CONTENTS, Page. lutiocUiction 7 CiiAPTKK I. Histoiieal evidence U Chaptkk II. Siiiiilarity of the arts and ciistoiiis of tlie iiioiiiid-biiildei.s to tliosc of ludiaus .. 14 Architecture 14 Tribal divinious 18 Similarity in burial customs 18 Removal of the llesh before burial I'J Burial beneath or in dwoUinys , 'Jl Burial in a sittinj^ or squatting posture 21 The use of lire iu burial ceremonies 21 Similarity of the stone implements and ornaments of various fribcs 22 Mound and Indian pottery 2)5 Chai'Tek III. Stone graves and what they teach 25 CllAPTKK I\'. The Cherokees as mound- builders :U CiiAPTEii V. The Cherokees and the Tallegwi 38 3 ILLUSTRATIONS. Fig. Till: PROBLEM OF THE OHIO MOUNDS. By Cyrus Thomas. rNTEODUCTION. No otboT ancient works of the United States have become so widely known or have excited so much interest as those of Ohio. This is due in part to their remarkable character but in a much greater degree to the "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Talley," by Messrs. Squier and Davis, in which these monuments are described and figured. The constantly recurring question, " Who constructed these works?" has brought before the public a number of widely diiferent theories, though the one which has been most generally accepted is that they originated with a people long since extinct or driven from the country, who had attained a culture status much in advance of that reached by the aborigines inhabiting the country at the time of its discovery by Europeans.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Historic American Indian Testimony Concerning the Ancient Earthworks of Eastern North America
    EARLY HISTORIC AMERICAN INDIAN TESTIMONY CONCERNING THE ANCIENT EARTHWORKS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA Bradley T. Lepper Abstract This study reports the results of a review and analysis of the historically documented views of American Indians relating to the mounds and enclosures of eastern North America with a focus on the Ohio valley. The earliest and most reliable sources indicate the American Indian tribes who occupied this region in the historic era had no traditions elucidating who built the mounds or why they had been built. The most common explanation given for the presence of these structures was that they were ancient forts. This interpretation may have been influ- enced by the idea once prevalent among European Americans, or it may have been one source of that popular, but largely erroneous conception. There is no consistent evidence that American Indians in eastern North Amer- ica uniformly regarded the earthworks as sacred or religiously significant. American Indian testimony provides no reliable support for any particular claims of cultural affiliation between any modern/historic tribe and any prehistoric earthwork in this region. Introduction toric era shared a cultural affiliation with the archaeo- logically defined cultures that built the earthworks. Increasingly, archaeologists and others are look- ing to American Indian oral traditions for insights into Methods the prehistoric past (e.g., Deloria 1995; Echo-Hawk 2000; Hall 1997). This continues a long-standing This study reports the results of a survey of the practice among archaeologists working in particular literature pertaining to historic American Indian regions, especially the American Southwest where knowledge of and attitudes towards the ancient continuity between aboriginal and contemporary Indi- earthworks of eastern North America, with emphasis an populations was clearly indicated (e.g., Fewkes on the Ohio valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Earthworks of the Mississippi Valley Illinois Kentucky
    Public Outreach Grant Outreach Public Southeastern Archaeological Conference Archaeological Southeastern Funds provided by: provided Funds Thank you to all the participating sites participating the all to you Thank Sunday 1:30pm-5:00pm. Sunday Hours: Monday - Saturday, 9:00am-5:00pm. 9:00am-5:00pm. Saturday, - Monday trail. ceremonial mounds, museum, gift shop, and nature nature and shop, gift museum, mounds, ceremonial tour a reconstructed Natchez Indian house, three three house, Indian Natchez reconstructed a tour Indians between 1682 and 1729. Visitors can can Visitors 1729. and 1682 between Indians the main ceremonial mound center for the Natchez Natchez the for center mound ceremonial main the The Grand Village of the Natchez Indians served as as served Indians Natchez the of Village Grand The NATCHEZ INDIANS NATCHEZ 15. GRAND VILLAGE OF THE OF VILLAGE GRAND 15. Hours: 9:00am-5:00pm. Friday, - Monday discovered in North America. North in discovered the site one the longest and earliest inhabited sites sites inhabited earliest and longest the one site the appointment only. only. appointment dating from about 1750 BC to 1500 AD, making making AD, 1500 to BC 1750 about from dating Closed 12:00pm-1:00pm. Saturday admission by by admission Saturday 12:00pm-1:00pm. Closed The Museum contains artifacts from Jaketown Jaketown from artifacts contains Museum The Hours: Hours: Monday - Friday, 9:00am-4:30pm. 9:00am-4:30pm. Friday, - Monday 14. JAKETOWN MUSEUM JAKETOWN 14. Louisiana’s original inhabitants. inhabitants. original Louisiana’s the enduring heritage and pride of Southern Southern of pride and heritage enduring the Sunday, 1:00pm-5:00pm.
    [Show full text]
  • AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS of the MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES on INTERPRETATIONS of MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY by E
    A HALLOWED PATH: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES ON INTERPRETATIONS OF MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY By ERIC DAVID SINGLETON Bachelor of Arts/Science in History The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2003 Master of Arts/Science in Museum Studies The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2008 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2017 A HALLOWED PATH: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES ON INTERPRETIONS OF MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY Dissertation Approved: Dr. L.G. Moses Dr. William S. Bryans Dr. Michael M. Smith Dr. F. Kent Reilly, III Dr. Stephen M. Perkins ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is true that nothing in this world is done alone. I would like to thank my family and friends for all their love and support. My grandparents, parents, sister, cousin, aunts and uncles. They were the foundation of everything that has shaped my life and allowed me the strength to complete this while working full-time. And, to my fiancée Kimberly. I mention her separately, not because she is not included above, but because she is the one person who diligently edited, listened, and gracefully sat by giving up years of vacations, holidays, and parties as I spent countless nights quietly writing. I would also give the most heartfelt thank you to Dr. Moses, Dr. McCoy, and Dr. Smith. Each of you made me the historian I am today. As Dr. James Ronda told me once, pick your professors, not the school—they will shape everything.
    [Show full text]