DOCSLIB.ORG

References14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
References14 REFERENCES14 Agin, Brent and Sharon Perkins. Healthy Aging for Dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Bailey, Linda. Aging Americans: Stranded Without Options, April 2004. Wiley Publishing, Inc., 2008. <http://www.transact.org/library/reports_html/seniors/aging.pdf> (3 Alicandri, Elizabeth. U.S. Department of Transportation, Email September 2009). Correspondence, 2 September 2009. Black, Linda. New York City Department for the Aging, Interview 7 July 2009, American Automobile Association (AAA). “Sharing a Drive to Protect Email Correspondence, 8 July 2009. Motorists.” <http://www.seniordrivers.org/pdf/carfit.pdf> (18 Brain Injury Association of America. “Brain Injury: The Golden Years- October 2009). Understanding and Preventing Adult Brain Injury.” <www.biausa. Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008. “ Section 902 org/publications/goldenyears2.pdf> (26 June 2009). Definition of the Term Disability - Notice Concerning The Americans Brown, Linda; Wainwright, Scott and Kevin Sylvester. “Traffic Control With Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008,” 1999. <http://www. Devices: The Same Message No Matter Where You Travel.” ITE eeoc.gov/policy/docs/902cm.html> (3 January 2011). Journal, March 2008. American Planning Association. “Complete Streets,” 2009. <http://www. Bude, Christine. “What Happens As We Age?” Associated Content, August planning.org/research/streets/index.htm> (11 November 2009). 10, 2007. <http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/338338/what_ ArcGIS 9.2. “Desktop help.” <http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.2/ happens_as_we_age.html?cat=52> index.cfm?TopicName=Natural_breaks_(Jenks)> (2 June 2009). (6 July 2009). Buntin, John. “Seniors and the City.” Governing June 2009. < http://www. Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) of 1968. <http://www.access-board.gov/ governing.com/article/seniors-and-city> (3 July 2009). about/laws/aba.htm> (17 December 2009). CarFit. “Frequently Asked Questions.” <http://www.car-fit.org/carfit/FAQ> Audirac, Ivonne. “Accessing Transit as Universal Design.” Journal of Planning (15 October 2009). Literature August 2008: Volume 23 Number 1. <http://jpl.sagepub. Carlson, Paul J. and Greg Schertz. “New MUTCD Minimum Sign com/cgi/content/abstract/23/1/4> (4 September 2009). Retroreflectivity Requirements.” ITE Journal, April 2008. “Avoiding Near-Misses in Crosswalks, Southeast Regional Maintenance Center for Universal Design. “About Universal Design.” <http://www.design. Center Mayport, Florida.” <http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/media/ ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm> (10 October 2009). traffic5100/pdf/preventing.pdf> (Accessed 11/9/09). Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). “The World Factbook 2009.” < https:// 124 www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html> Federal Transit Administration. “Code of Federal Regulations Title 49 Section (12 December 2009). 37.53.” <http://www.fta.dot.gov/civilrights/ada/civil_rights_3906. City of New York. Mayor’s Office. “Mayor Bloomberg and Taxi Commissioner html> (5 November 2009). Yassky Announce Three Finalists to Be the New, Exclusive New York Federal Transit Administration. “New Starts Fact Sheet.” <http://www.fta. City Taxicab.” City of New York. City of New York, 15 Nov. 2010. dot.gov/planning/newstarts/planning_environment_2607.html> (10 January 2010). <www.nyc.gov>. (17 Nov. 2010) Finkelstein, Ruth. The New York Academy of Medicine, Interview, 8 June City of New York. Mayor’s Office. “Mayor Bloomberg, Speaker Quinn and 2009. the New York Academy of Medicine Unveil Blueprint to Enhance Freund, Katherine and James McKnight. “Independent Transportation City’s Livability for Older New Yorkers.” City of New York. City of New Network: Alternative for the Elderly.” Transportation Research Board, York, 25 Aug 2009 <www.nyc.gov>. (17 Nov. 2010). March 1997. <http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/studies/ Practices of Current - A Scan POPULATION AN AGING FOR MOBILITY INITIATIVES City Parks Foundation. “City Parks Senior Fitness Programs.” <http://www. idea/finalreports/transit/Transit9_Final_Report.pdf> (3 December cityparksfoundation.org/index1.aspx?BD=17019> (31 January 2010). CNN Money.com. “The Future of Car Safety.” <http://money.cnn.com/ 2009). galleries/2009/moneymag/0911/gallery.car_safety.moneymag/ Frumkin, Howard et al. Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, index.html> (15 November 2009). and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington D.C.: Island Cox, Kathy. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Telephone Press, 2004. Interview, 19 February 2010. Giuliano, Genevieve, et.al. “Travel Patterns of the Elderly,” Met Trans Project, School of Policy, Planning, & Development, University of Southern Cox, Paul. Department for Transport, Email Correspondence, 4 September California, July 2003. <http://www.metrans.org/research/final/00- 2009. 08_Final.pdf> (12 September 2009). Crossrail. “Welcome to Crossrail.” <http://www.crossrail.co.uk> (5 February Godfrey, David. Kirkland Public Works Department, Telephone Interview, 27 2010). October 2009. Crowson, Darren. Transport for London, Email Correspondence, 5 October Godfrey, David and Tony Mazzella. “Kirkland’s Experience with In-Pavement 2009 and 2 February 2010. Flashing Lights at Crosswalks,” (paper presented at the ITE/IMSA Davis, Robert and Anthony DeBarros. “Older, Dangerous Drivers a Growing Annual Meeting, 8 February 1999) <http://www.ci.kirkland.wa.us/ Problem.” USA Today, 2 May 2007 <http://www.usatoday.com/ depart/Public_Works/Transportation___Streets/Kirkland_s_ news/nation/2007-05-02-older-drivers-usat1a_N.htm> (22 June Experience_with_In-pavement_Flashing_Crosswalks.htm> (October 2009). 2009). DeNucci, Joseph A. Independent State Auditors Report on Massachusetts Bay Gov Track. <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-584> (4 Transportation Authority Administration of the Ride Program July September 2009). 2004 to June 2008, December 2009. Governor’s Traffic Safety Advisory Commission (GTSAC). Michigan Senior Department for Transport. “Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations: Mobility Action Plan 2009-2012, January 2009. Exemption Orders Annual Report 2008.” <http://www.dft.gov.uk/ <http://www.michigan.gov/documents/MichiganSeniorMobilityActio nPlanfinal_162718_7.pdf> (3 September 2009). transportforyou/access/rail/vehicles/pubs/rva/rvarannualreport08. Greater London Authority, Transport Committee. Braking Point: 20 mph pdf> (31 January 2010). Speed Limits in London, April 2009. <http://www.london.gov.uk/ Dill, Jennifer. Travel Choices at TODs: Survey Results from Portland’s Eastside, assembly/reports/transport/braking-point-20mph.pdf> (12 August 10 December 10 2007. <http://web.pdx.edu/~jdill/Files/Dill_ 2009). EastsideTOD_final_report_2007.pdf> (2 October 2008). Green, Donna. City of Portland Bureau of Transportation, Email DiPaolo, Thomas. Mass Highway, Email Correspondence, 23 September Correspondence, 14 April 2011. 2009. Greene, Kelly. “12 People Who are Changing Your Retirement.” Wall Street Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Building Healthy Communities Journal, 16 February 2008. <http://online.wsj.com/public/article_ for Active Aging Awards 2008.” <http://www.epa.gov/aging/bhc/ print/SB120283234025062481.html> (3 September 2009). awards/2008/index.html#content> (21 April 2009). 125 Grover, Judy. “NORC Program Senior Services Restore Communities.” The alternatives-for-minnesota.php> (6 August 2009). Cooperator, The Co-op and Condo Monthly, May 2000. <http:// Kaucic, Michelle. New York City Department of Transportation, Email cooperator.com/articles/532/1/NORC-Program/Page1.html> (13 Correspondence, 2 June 2009. September 2009). King, Rod. “Portsmouth: Changing the Way We Share Our Streets,” Grundy, Chris et al. 20 Mph Zones and Road Safety in London: A Report to September 2009. <http://20splentyforus.org.uk/portsmouth.htm> the London Road Safety Unit, 2008. <http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/ (11 November 2009). downloads/20-mph-zones-and-road-safety-in-london.pdf> (4 Kugel, Jason. TAPCO, Phone Interview, 19 October 2009. September 2009). Laplante, John and Barbara McCann. “Complete Streets: We Can Get There Harrington, Candy. “Tokyo Olympic Bid Highlights Universal Design,” from Here.” ITE Journal, May 2008. 8 April 2009. <http://barrierfreetravels.com/serendipity/ Lariviere, Kim. Michigan Department of Transportation, Email archives/427-Tokyo-Olympic-Bid-Highlights-Universal-Design.html> Correspondence, 30 July 2009. (18 October 2009). Lubman, Ilona. New York City Department of Transportation, Phone Harrington, Carol Joyce. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Phone Interview, 26 May 2009. Interview, 11 February 2010. Lynott, Jana et al. Planning Complete Streets for an Aging America, May Hester, Jean. City of Portland, Telephone Interview, 2 September 2009. 2009. <http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/2009_02_streets_5.pdf > Hevesi, Alan G. “Letter to Mr. Edwin Mendez-Santiago.” 28 September 2004. (10 November 2009). <http://www.osc.state.ny.us/audits/allaudits/093004/04f11.pdf> (5 London Assembly. Braking Point: 20 Mph Speed Limits in London, April 2009. September 2009). <http://www.20splentyforus.org.uk/UsefulReports/braking-point- Hirsch, Larry. New York City Transit, Phone Interview, 12 August 2009. 20mph.pdf> (5 September 2009). Holbrook, Lisa. Portland Independent Transportation Network, Telephone Mace, Ronald L. “Last Speech: A Perspective on Universal Design,” Conversation, 15 December 2009. 19 June 1998. <http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_us/ Hood, Clifton. 722 Miles: The Building of the Subways
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4203 SLT Brochure 6/21/04 19:08 Page 1
    4203 SLT brochure 6/21/04 19:08 Page 1 South London Trams Transport for Everyone The case for extensions to Tramlink 4203 SLT brochure 6/21/04 19:09 Page 2 South London Trams Introduction South London Partnership Given the importance of good Tramlink is a highly successful integrated transport and the public transport system. It is is the strategic proven success of Tramlink reliable, frequent and fast, offers a partnership for south in the region, South London high degree of personal security, Partnership together with the is well used and highly regarded. London. It promotes London Borough of Lambeth has the interests of south established a dedicated lobby This document sets out the case group – South London Trams – for extensions to the tram London as a sub-region to promote extensions to the network in south London. in its own right and as a Tramlink network in south London, drawing on the major contributor to the widespread public and private development of London sector support for trams and as a world class city. extensions in south London. 4203 SLT brochure 6/21/04 19:09 Page 4 South London Trams Transport for Everyone No need for a ramp operated by the driver “Light rail delivers The introduction of Tramlink has The tram has also enabled Integration is key to Tramlink’s been hugely beneficial for its local previously isolated local residents success. Extending Tramlink fast, frequent and south London community. It serves to travel to jobs, training, leisure provides an opportunity for the reliable services and the whole of the community, with and cultural activities – giving wider south London community trams – unlike buses and trains – them a greater feeling of being to enjoy these benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfl Interchange Signs Standard
    Transport for London Interchange signs standard Issue 5 MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London 1 Interchange signs standard Contents 1 Introduction 3 Directional signs and wayfinding principles 1.1 Types of interchange sign 3.1 Directional signing at Interchanges 1.2 Core network symbols 3.2 Directional signing to networks 1.3 Totem signs 3.3 Incorporating service information 1.3 Horizontal format 3.4 Wayfinding sequence 1.4 Network identification within interchanges 3.5 Accessible routes 1.5 Pictograms 3.6 Line diagrams – Priciples 3.7 Line diagrams – Line representation 3.8 Line diagrams – Symbology 3.9 Platform finders Specific networks : 2 3.10 Platform confirmation signs National Rail 2.1 3.11 Platform station names London Underground 2.2 3.12 Way out signs Docklands Light Railway 2.3 3.13 Multiple exits London Overground 2.4 3.14 Linking with Legible London London Buses 2.5 3.15 Exit guides 2.6 London Tramlink 3.16 Exit guides – Decision points 2.7 London Coach Stations 3.17 Exit guides on other networks 2.8 London River Services 3.18 Signing to bus services 2.9 Taxis 3.19 Signing to bus services – Route changes 2.10 Cycles 3.20 Viewing distances 3.21 Maintaining clear sightlines 4 References and contacts Interchange signing standard Issue 5 1 Introduction Contents Good signing and information ensure our customers can understand Londons extensive public transport system and can make journeys without undue difficulty and frustruation. At interchanges there may be several networks, operators and line identities which if displayed together without consideration may cause confusion for customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Croydon Tramlink Derailment on 9 November 2016 1
    Safety, Sustainability and Human Resources Panel Date: 17 November 2016 Item: Croydon Tramlink Derailment on 9 November 2016 1 Summary 1.1 This item will provide an update on the Croydon Tramlink derailment on 9 November 2016. 1.2 The incident occurred on the day of publication of the agenda and papers for this meeting and accordingly an update will be provided at the meeting. 2 Recommendation 2.1 The Panel is asked to note this paper. List of appendices to this report: Presentation on Croydon Tramlink Derailment List of Background Papers: None. Contact: Leon Daniels, Managing Director, Surface Transport Number: 020 3054 0180 Email: [email protected] 1 THURSDAY 17 NOVEMBER Croydon Tramlink derailment on 9 November 2016 2 CROYDON TRAMLINK DERAILMENT What happened At 06:07 on Wednesday 9 November, tram 2551 was travelling from New Addington to Sandilands As it came out of the tunnel section, it began to follow the turn in the track but as it did so it derailed and subsequently turned onto its right side Emergency services – London Ambulance Service, London Fire Brigade and British Transport Police – were contacted and responded swiftly Tragically, this resulted in seven fatalities and 51 injuries requiring hospital treatment Rails and electrical equipment in the area suffered significant infrastructure damage 3 CROYDON TRAMLINK DERAILMENT Location To Beckenham Junction/Elmers End Site of incident Sandilands tramstop Direction of travel To New Addington To Croydon/Wimbledon 4 CROYDON TRAMLINK DERAILMENT Our immediate response Following
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Environmental Statement 8A
    Crossrail Environmental Statement Volume 8a Appendices Transport assessment: methodology and principal findings 8a If you would like information about Crossrail in your language, please contact Crossrail supplying your name and postal address and please state the language or format that you require. To request information about Crossrail contact details: in large print, Braille or audio cassette, Crossrail FREEPOST NAT6945 please contact Crossrail. London SW1H0BR Email: [email protected] Helpdesk: 0845 602 3813 (24-hours, 7-days a week) Crossrail Environmental Statement Volume 8A – Appendices Transport Assessment: Methodology and Principal Findings February 2005 This volume of the Transport Assessment Report is produced by Mott MacDonald – responsible for assessment of temporary impacts for the Central and Eastern route sections and for editing and co-ordination; Halcrow – responsible for assessment of permanent impacts route-wide; Scott Wilson – responsible for assessment of temporary impacts for the Western route section; and Faber Maunsell – responsible for assessment of temporary and permanent impacts in the Tottenham Court Road East station area, … working with the Crossrail Planning Team. Mott MacDonald St Anne House, 20–26 Wellesley Road, Croydon, Surrey CR9 2UL, United Kingdom www.mottmac.com Halcrow Group Limited Vineyard House, 44 Brook Green, Hammersmith, London W6 7BY, United Kingdom www.halcrow.com Scott Wilson 8 Greencoat Place, London SW1P 1PL, United Kingdom This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald, Halcrow, Scott www.scottwilson.com Wilson and Faber Maunsell being obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • London Trams Table of Contents
    Rail Vehicle Accessibility: Exemption Application London Trams Table of Contents Foreword..............................................................................................................................3 Passenger Doorway Audible Warning Devices.................................................................4 Internal Passenger Information Displays ..........................................................................8 Handrail Clearances, Door Lighting, Floor Obstruction .................................................12 Page 2 of 17 Foreword The 24 Bombardier CR4000 trams entered service in 2000 at which time the Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations (RVAR) 1998 was in force, with the newer 12 Stadler Variobahn trams entering service in 2012, 2015 and 2016. RVAR 2010 came into force on 6th April 2010. The following year Transport for London (TfL) commissioned a review of the Bombardier CR4000 fleet against the Requirements of RVAR 2010. Since the 2011 review several work streams have been carried out to make modifications to the trams to address the areas of non-compliance. However due to the prioritisation of maintenance activities to ensure availability of the required number of trams to meet service each day and safety related works; all the necessary modifications to the trams have not taken place. Operating within tight budgetary constraints has also led to the de-scoping of works items, and often meant the non- availability of budget for works to take place. A further review against the Requirements was performed in August 2019, during which several of the open items on the Bombardier CR4000 were closed, with a few remaining non-compliant. A few instances of non-compliance were also noted on the newer Stadler Trams. Subsequently London Trams has compiled the following application for time limited and permanent exemptions against the remaining areas of non-compliance against the Requirements. Page 3 of 17 Passenger Doorway Audible Warning Devices 1.
    [Show full text]
  • What Light Rail Can Do for Cities
    WHAT LIGHT RAIL CAN DO FOR CITIES A Review of the Evidence Final Report: Appendices January 2005 Prepared for: Prepared by: Steer Davies Gleave 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD [t] +44 (0)20 7919 8500 [i] www.steerdaviesgleave.com Passenger Transport Executive Group Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 2DE What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review of the Evidence Contents Page APPENDICES A Operation and Use of Light Rail Schemes in the UK B Overseas Experience C People Interviewed During the Study D Full Bibliography P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review Of The Evidence P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review of the Evidence APPENDIX A Operation and Use of Light Rail Schemes in the UK P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review Of The Evidence A1. TYNE & WEAR METRO A1.1 The Tyne and Wear Metro was the first modern light rail scheme opened in the UK, coming into service between 1980 and 1984. At a cost of £284 million, the scheme comprised the connection of former suburban rail alignments with new railway construction in tunnel under central Newcastle and over the Tyne. Further extensions to the system were opened to Newcastle Airport in 1991 and to Sunderland, sharing 14 km of existing Network Rail track, in March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Tramway Wheel and Rail Profiles to Minimise Derailment
    Rail Te~h~~l~~~ l~l~~t at Manchester Metropolitan University Determination of Tramway Wheel and Rail Profiles to Minimise Derailment Date: 12th February 2008 RTU Ref: 90/3/A Client: ORR Authors: Dr Paul Allen Dr Adam Bevan Senior Research Engineer Senior Research Engineer Tel: 0161 247 6251 Tel: 0161 247 6514 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] ,; oFFacE o~ aa~~ a~cu~arioN Determination of Tramway Wheel and Rail Profiles to Minimise Derailment Final Report Project Title Determination of Tramway Wheel and Rail Profiles to Minimise Derailment(ORR/CT /338/DTR) Project Manager Dr. Paul Allen Client ORR Date 12/02/2008 Project Duration 6 Months Issue 1 Distribution Dudley Hoddinott (ORR) David Keay (ORR) PDA/AB/SDI/JMS (RTU) Project file Report No. 90/3/A Reviewed bv: Prof. Simon Iwnicki Contact: Dr Paul Allen Senior Research Engineer Tel: 0161 247 6251 E-mail: [email protected] si !Yw. 2n'.-^y..yy.:m'~ ~ 4'~:~~ .!fit'•.. ~' .y,.l.: CONFIDENTIAL Determination of Tramway Wheel and Rail Profiles to Minimise Derailment Final Report Summary As the first phase of a three stage project, the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) commissioned a wide ranging study to review current tramway systems and their wheel and rail profiles within the UK. Completed by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Labs, the work was reported under the Phase 1 ORR study document, entitled `A survey of UK tram and light railway systems relating to the wheel/rail interface' ~'~. Phase 2 of the work, presented within this report, analyses this initial study and extends the work through the application of wheel-rail contact analysis techniques and railway vehicle dynamics modelling to determine optimised wheel and rail profile combinations which minimise derailment risk and wear.
    [Show full text]
  • Oliver Stewart Senior Executive, RAIB Relationship and Recommendation Handling Telephone 020 7282 3864 E-Mail [email protected]
    Oliver Stewart Senior Executive, RAIB Relationship and Recommendation Handling Telephone 020 7282 3864 E-mail [email protected] 5 October 2015 Mr Andrew Hall Deputy Chief Inspector of Rail Accidents Cullen House Berkshire Copse Rd Aldershot Hampshire GU11 2HP Dear Andrew, RAIB Report: Tram running with doors open on London Tramlink, Croydon I write to provide an update1 on the action taken in respect of recommendations 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 addressed to ORR in the above report, published on 6 March 2014. The annex to this letter provides details of the action taken. The status of recommendations 2 and 4 is ‘Implemented’. We do not propose to take any further action in respect of these recommendations unless we become aware that any of the information provided becomes inaccurate, in which case I will write to you again. The status of recommendations 3, 6, 7 and 8 is ‘Implementation ongoing’. ORR will advise RAIB when further information is available regarding actions being taken to address these recommendations. We will publish this response on the ORR website on 9 October 2015. Yours sincerely, Oliver Stewart 1 In accordance with Regulation 12(2)(b) of the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005 6842358 Annex 1. All 8 recommendations were addressed to ORR when the report was published on 6 March 2014. 2. We wrote to you on 15 May 2015 to report that recommendation 5 had been implemented. We had previously written to you on 3 March 2015 to report that recommendations 1 and 4 had been implemented, recommendations 2, 3, 6 and 7 were ‘Implementation ongoing’ and recommendation 8 was ‘In progress’.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutton Tramlink Extension
    Sutton Tramlink Extension Economic Benefits Prospectus May 2013 “There is a clear business case for this infrastructure in Sutton, the tram would be a very welcome investment into the Borough. It will enable access to employment, to education, and improve the prospects of our town centre businesses.” Colin Hall, Deputy Leader, London Borough of Sutton “The Tramlink has made a significant impact on the lives of people who live and work in our borough, and shows how investment in transport infrastructure is the way to unlock prosperity and growth in an area. Extending the tram route will be a huge benefit to many Merton businesses and residents, in particular regenerating Morden Town centre. It has been a longstanding aspiration for Merton and is part of our core planning strategy.” Stephen Alambritis, Leader, London Borough of Merton “Light rail supports economic growth and provides regeneration opportunities. It is time that Sutton was connected to the Tramlink network, and able to take advantage of the benefits that this will bring.” Tom Brake, Member of Parliament for Carshalton and Wallington “As Minister responsible for local transport I fully support light rail and believe it has a future within this country. It has proved itself an effective and efficient means of taking large numbers of passengers directly into, and around, the heart of an urban area, it is also one of the greenest and cleanest forms of transport - no emissions, very little noise and with the right scheme in the right place, it has the potential to encourage people out of their cars and on to public transport.
    [Show full text]
  • We're Working Hard on How We Deal with Delays
    Suggested alternative routes during disruption When Thameslink services from this station are subject to unplanned disruption, we have Issued Date: arranged for your ticket to be accepted as indicated below to get you to your destination May 2017 Suggested alternative route details from London Bridge National rail and local bus alternatives Thameslink ticket holders To: Suggested routes: Bedford, Flitwick, Harlington, Leagrave, Luton, Northern line to Kings Cross St Pancras; then if it runs Thameslink train from London St Pancras Luton Airport Parkway, International to your destination Harpenden, St Albans City, BEDFORD West Hampstead Thameslink X5# X5# St Neots MILTON Sandy KEYNES Flitwick 81# Biggleswade London St Pancras International Northern line or bus 17 (from stop M on London Bridge) to London St Pancras International CENTRAL Harlington Leagrave Arlesey LUTON 101 Farringdon Northern line to Moorgate; then Circle/Hammersmith & City/Metropolitan line to Farringdon Bletchley LUTON AIRPORT 100 HITCHIN PARKWAY 757* (see note below) STEVENAGE City Thameslink Bus 17 (from stop M on London Bridge) to Ludgate Hill (stop F) for City Thameslink station 321 366# Harpenden 366# Knebworth Northern line to Bank or walk over London Bridge to Monument Underground station; then Circle/ St Albans London Blackfriars Welwyn North District line to London Blackfriars Abbey Watford 321 WELWYN GARDEN CITY Junction ST ALBANS CITY 724 300, 301, Hatfield If it runs, Southern or Thameslink train to East Croydon. Alternatively take Northern line to Balham;
    [Show full text]
  • Research Guide No 4: Key Dates in the History of London Transport
    TfL Corporate Archives Research Guides Research Guide No 4: Key Dates in the History of London Transport The following dates and events have been extracted from London Transport Diaries and other information in the Archives. Date Event 1829 First horse drawn bus service, operated by George Shillibeer, between Paddington and the Bank, via the Angel. Bus had 22 seats, was drawn by three horses 1831 First mechanical bus. Hancock‟s steam carriage ran Stratford to London 1832 Stage Carriages Act – introduction of licences for buses 1836 First steam railway in London, from Tooley Street (London Bridge) to Deptford, opened by the London & Greenwich Railway 1838 Introduction of drivers‟ and conductors‟ licences 1840 First era of steam buses ended 1843 Opening of the Thames Tunnel, now used by the East London Line. Used only by pedestrians until the 1860's 1850 Horse buses with roof seats – the „knifeboard‟ type – started to run in London 1851 Thomas Tilling started running horse-buses from Peckham 1855 London General Omnibus Company Ltd, formed in Paris as Compagnie des Omnibus de Londres, it was reregistered as an English Company in 1858. Its object was to purchase and operate the horse buses of London, owned for the most part by small scale proprietors. Operation began in 1856 1861-1862 First horse tramways, built by George Francis Train, an American, opened in London, but were unsuccessful and soon removed. The first was along the Bayswater Road from Marble Arch to Porchester Terrace 10/01/1863 First part of the Metropolitan Railway opened, from Paddington (Bishop‟s Road) to Farringdon Street (now Farringdon).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Overview 1.1 Wimbledon Station Is to Be
    ACCESSIBLE JOURNEY PLANNING - WIMBLEDON STATION Jonathan Shewell-Cooper & Nick Knowles 1 Overview 1.1 Wimbledon station is to be found in London SW19. The station (Figure 1) is served by the London Underground (District Line), Croydon Tramlink and National Rail. The station has ten platforms; platforms 1-4 serve the District line, platforms 5-9 National Rail and platform 10 National Rail/Tramlink. The station is managed by South West Trains. There are a number of bus stops that serve Wimbledon station both on Wimbledon Bridge and Alexander Road. Wimbledon station has a ticket hall that serves National Rail, Underground and Tramlink. There are stairs and lifts down from the ticket hall main concourse to all platforms. Wimbledon is marked on the London Underground map as having step free access from the platform to the street. 1.2 Wimbledon station is a transport gateway for the Wimbledon Olympic venue. 1.3 A key travel requirement for the London 2012 games is to deliver accessible journey plans to support the Games Network of Accessible Transport (GNAT). To support this Transport Direct is investigating the necessary changes to the data standards to support the modelling of stations. 1.4 This paper maps the use cases for accessible journey planning to the model for Wimbledon station, building on the paper from MDV Accessibility Information which uses Wimbledon as its model. It compares current concrete data elements of the UK NaPTAN stop model for Wimbledon with the same data in the new enhanced CEN IFOPT model in order to illustrate key additional concepts that could be captured to enable enhanced journey planning including accessibility.
    [Show full text]