DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmentally Friendly Agriculture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Notice Environmentally Friendly Agriculture Success Stories of Agri-environment Measures of Estonian Rural Development Plan 2007―2013 Dear Reader Publisher: This is a new publication of success stories of Estonian Rural Development Plan issued by Estonian National Rural Economy Research Centre www.maainfo.ee Rural Network Support Unit. Previous publications include “Notice the Innovative Agriculture”, “Notice LEADER” and a number of other publications of LEADER success stories. Texts: Helen Külvik and Triin Nõu / NGO Loodusajakiri The publication gives an overview of the measures implemented within the framework of agri―environment Agricultural Research Centre support scheme in 2007―2013. You can gain an insight into eleven success stories presenting reasons for Ministry of Rural Affairs agricultural producers to pursue environmentally friendly agriculture or organic farming and the impact of agri-environment support of the Estonian Rural Development Plan 2007―2013 (ERDP) on the application of Editors: these measures. Ester Valdvee and Reve Lambur The area under environmentally friendly management was approximately 400 000 ha and the area under Translators: organic farming over 126 000 ha supported from agri-environment support measures of the RDP. Supports Anneli Saluste and Helen Külvik (success stories) have contributed to the preservation of endangered breeds and species and Natura 2000 areas, as well as to the maintenance of semi-natural habitats and the restoration of stonewalls. Design: Koidu Pilve / Pinnamuster LLC In addition to success stories, the description, objectives and information of measures for the period 2014―2020 have been provided. Print: Ecoprint AS Agri-environment support measures can briefly be described by five key words: • biodiversity ISBN 978-9949-9871-2-2 (publication) • soil protection ISBN 978-9949-9871-3-9 (pdf) • water protection • endangered species © Rural Economy Research Centre 2017 Jäneda • landscapes The publication has received support from the Estonian Each story can be expanded to at least three key words because the pursued environmentally friendly activ- Rural Development Plan 2014―2020 through the technical ities are meeting several objectives at a time. assistance resources allocated to activities of the Estonian Rural Network Unit The Estonian National Rural Network Support Unit is grateful to the Estonian Agricultural Research Centre for compiling the texts of the agri-environment measures, as well as the Estonian Ministry of Rural Affairs for the overview of the implementation of the agri-environment support scheme. ISBN 978-9949-9871-2-2 Rural and Innovation Network Bureau of the Rural Economy Research Centre 9 7 8 9 9 4 9 9 8 7 1 2 2 1 Introduction 1 Contents 2 ERDP 2007―2013 Axis 2 ― Supporting Environmentally Friendly Agriculture 3 MEASURE (code 214) ― In Fact, the Farming Practices of our Ancestors Were Environmentally Friendly 6 ERDP 2007-2013 Axis 2 - Parduse Farm: Just the Right Size 8 At Pajusi, Both Environment and the Community are Held Important 10 Supporting Environmentally MEASURE (code 214) ― Centuries of Energy Accumulated in ‘Sangaste’ Rye 12 Friendly Agriculture MEASURE (code 214) ― Genetic Diversity in Agriculture 13 The Sepa Farm is Counting on the Dairy Plant 14 Kaarli Farm in the Swirl of Turning Points 16 Food production as any other type of activity has a certain impact on the environment which can be either good or bad. Very intensive management MEASURE (code 214) ― Semi-natural Habitats Protect us and Give us a Warning 18 methods are too capital-using whereas not managing the land is not good for the nature. MEASURE (code 216) ― Stonewalls as a Piece of our Agri-culture 19 Different management methods and the diversity of landscapes are the pre- The Peculiar Kurese Farm 20 requisites for the preservation of biodiversity. How to achieve biodiversity when market prices favour monoculture production and it is cheaper to keep The Iisaka Farm, Paradise of Sheep 22 cattle in barns all year round? It can be said for certain that agri-environment measures will be implemented as long as they are in accordance with good MEASURE (code 215) ― Thanks to the Support Cows are Grazed on Pasture 24 agricultural practice and are not very costly. MEASURE (code 212) ― Maintenance of Lands in Less-Favoured Areas Contribute to the Preservation of the Countryside 25 Agri-environmental support schemes of the Rural Development Plan have been introduced for encouraging agricultural producers to apply more envi- Rural Entrepreneurship Keeps the Family Together 26 ronmentally friendly methods. Agri-environmental payments compensate fully or partly for income forgone or additional costs of environmentally friendly The Main Beef Cattle Farmers of Vormsi Care about the Nature 28 management. MEASURE (code 214) ― Organic Farming ― the Most Environmentally Friendly Production Method 30 A total of 942.84 million euros was paid from the funds of the second Estonian Rural Development Plan (ERDP) 2007―2013. The most significant share (37.5%) MEASURE (code 213) ― Pan-European Network Protects Endangered Species and Habitats 31 of the budget was paid for Axis 1 supports (improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector), almost the same proportion (36.75%) The Organic Boutique of Koplimäe 32 was paid for Axis 2 supports (improving the environment and the countryside). Payments for Axis 3 supports (quality of life in rural area and diversification) Peri Organic Manor is Growing some Special Vegetables 34 contributed to 12.32%, payments for Axis 4 (LEADER) supports to 9.03% and payments for technical assistance (Axis 5) to 4.39% of the budget. Breakdown The Story of Pajumäe Farm: from Roses to Yoghurt 36 of ERDP 2007―2013 funds between different axes is provided in figure 1. Colour it yourself! 38 2 3 Breakdown of RDP 2007―2013 Breakdown of RDP 2007―2013 Axis 2 Breakdown of RDP 2007―2013 agri-environment payments by axes payments by measures payments by submeasures € 41 407 073,29 € 310 338 € 18 422 953 € 27 377 485 € 85 163 075,13 € 62 729 637 € 3 049 309 € 114 240 € 126 071 216 € 25 180 194 € 353 574 315,69 € 3 664 875 € 116 159 178,92 € 5 000 633 € 231 839 854 € 74 612 038 € 346 532 915,97 Support for less-favoured areas Non-productive investments Environmentally friendly management Natura 2000 support for agri- Support for the establishment of Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 3 Axis 4 Axis 5 Support for organic production cultural land protection forest Agri-environmental support Natura 2000 support for private Support for keeping animals of local endangered breeds forest land Figure 1. Breakdown of ERDP 2007—2013 payments by axes. Animal welfare support Support for growing plants of local varieties Support for the maintenance of semi-natural habitats The following measures were implemented within the framework Figure 2. Breakdown of RDP 2007—2013 Axis 2 of improving the environment and the countryside, i.e Axis 2: payments by measures. Figure 3. Breakdown of agri-environment payments by submeasures. 1. Support for less-favoured areas 2. Natura 2000 support for agricultural land 3. Measure 2.3 ― agri-environmental support 346.53 million euros paid within the framework of Axis 2 was divided • Submeasure 2.3.1 ― environmentally friendly management between the measures as follows: agri-environmental support con- • Submeasure 2.3.2 ― support for organic production tributed to 66.9% of total Axis 2 support, support for less-favoured The following pages will give an overview of the benefits gained with the support. • Submeasure 2.3.3 ― support for keeping animals of local areas to 18.10%, animal welfare to 7.27%, Natura 2000 support for endangered breeds private forest land to 5.32%, Natura 2000 support for agricultural Currently the new Rural Development Plan 2014―2020 is being implemented. Several new envi- • Submeasure 2.3.4 ― support for growing plants of local land to 1.44%, non-productive investments to 0.88% and support for ronmental supports have been introduced focusing on more specific environmental issues (region- varieties the establishment of protection forest on agricultural land to 0.09% al soil protection support, environmentally friendly horticulture support) or a specific region (re- • Submeasure 2.3.5 ― support for the maintenance of semi- of total Axis 2 support. Breakdown of Axis 2 support between meas- gional water protection support). All previously implemented support schemes ― environmentally natural habitat ures is provided in figure 2. friendly management, support for keeping animals of local endangered breeds and for growing 4. Measure 2.4 ― animal welfare: support for grazing animals plants of local varieties, support for the maintenance of semi-natural habitats, animal welfare 5. Measure 2.5 ― non-productive investments The budget of agri-environmental support (AES) scheme was divided support and support for organic production have been amended to be able to even better meet • Submeasure 2.5.1 ― support for the establishment and between submeasures as follows: 54.38% of the budget accounted the environmental objectives. Let’s take notice of the environmentally friendly agriculture! restoration of stonewalls for environmentally friendly management, 32.18% for organic pro- • Submeasure 2.5.2 ― support for the establishment of mixed duction, 11.81% for the maintenance of semi-natural habitats, 1.58% Sille Teiter, species hedgerows for keeping animals of local endangered breeds and 0.05% of the Chief Specialist of the Agri-Environment Bureau of the Ministry of Rural Affairs 6. Measure 2.6 ― support for the establishment of protection support scheme accounted for growing plants of local varieties. forest on agricultural land Breakdown of the agri-environment budget between submeasures 7. Measure 2.7 ― Natura 2000 support for private forest land is provided in figure 3. 4 5 In Numbers To date the EFM support has contributed to the largest share of contributed to better implementation of all EFM requirements. In Fact, the Farming Practices agri-environmental support scheme payments both in terms of the number of applicants and the area of land.
Recommended publications
  • The Baltic Republics

    The Baltic Republics

    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES THE BALTIC REPUBLICS A Strategic Survey Erkki Nordberg National Defence College Helsinki 1994 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Mikko Viitasalo, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Antti Numminen, General Headquarters Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 6 THE BALTIC REPUBLICS A Strategic Survey Erkki Nordberg National Defence College Helsinki 1992 ISBN 951-25-0709-9 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1994: National Defence College All rights reserved Painatuskeskus Oy Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1994 Preface Until the end of the First World War, the Baltic region was understood as a geographical area comprising the coastal strip of the Baltic Sea from the Gulf of Danzig to the Gulf of Finland. In the years between the two World Wars the concept became more political in nature: after Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania obtained their independence in 1918 the region gradually became understood as the geographical entity made up of these three republics. Although the Baltic region is geographically fairly homogeneous, each of the newly restored republics possesses unique geographical and strategic features.
  • Alevist Vallamajani from Borough to Community House

    Alevist Vallamajani from Borough to Community House

    Eesti Vabaõhumuuseumi Toimetised 2 Alevist vallamajani Artikleid maaehitistest ja -kultuurist From borough to community house Articles on rural architecture and culture Tallinn 2010 Raamatu väljaandmist on toetanud Eesti Kultuurkapital. Toimetanud/ Edited by: Heiki Pärdi, Elo Lutsepp, Maris Jõks Tõlge inglise keelde/ English translation: Tiina Mällo Kujundus ja makett/ Graphic design: Irina Tammis Trükitud/ Printed by: AS Aktaprint ISBN 978-9985-9819-3-1 ISSN-L 1736-8979 ISSN 1736-8979 Sisukord / Contents Eessõna 7 Foreword 9 Hanno Talving Hanno Talving Ülevaade Eesti vallamajadest 11 Survey of Estonian community houses 45 Heiki Pärdi Heiki Pärdi Maa ja linna vahepeal I 51 Between country and town I 80 Marju Kõivupuu Marju Kõivupuu Omad ja võõrad koduaias 83 Indigenous and alien in home garden 113 Elvi Nassar Elvi Nassar Setu küla kontrolljoone taga – Lõkova Lykova – Setu village behind the 115 control line 149 Elo Lutsepp Elo Lutsepp Asustuse kujunemine ja Evolution of settlement and persisting ehitustraditsioonide püsimine building traditions in Peipsiääre Peipsiääre vallas. Varnja küla 153 commune. Varnja village 179 Kadi Karine Kadi Karine Miljööväärtuslike Virumaa Milieu-valuable costal villages of rannakülade Eisma ja Andi väärtuste Virumaa – Eisma and Andi: definition määratlemine ja kaitse 183 of values and protection 194 Joosep Metslang Joosep Metslang Palkarhitektuuri taastamisest 2008. Methods for the preservation of log aasta uuringute põhjal 197 architecture based on the studies of 2008 222 7 Eessõna Eesti Vabaõhumuuseumi toimetiste teine köide sisaldab 2008. aasta teaduspäeva ettekannete põhjal kirjutatud üpris eriilmelisi kirjutisi. Omavahel ühendab neid ainult kaks põhiteemat: • maaehitised ja maakultuur. Hanno Talvingu artikkel annab rohkele arhiivimaterjalile ja välitööaine- sele toetuva esmase ülevaate meie valdade ja vallamajade kujunemisest alates 1860.
  • Lihula Valla Arengukava Aastateks 2011-2020

    Lihula Valla Arengukava Aastateks 2011-2020

    Kinnitatud Lihula Vallavolikogu 28. aprilli 2011 määrusega nr 14 Muudetud Lihula Vallavolikogu 25. oktoobri 2012 määrusega nr 14 Muudetud Lihula Vallavolikogu 30. oktoobri 2014 määrusega nr 24 LIHULA VALLA ARENGUKAVA AASTATEKS 2011-2020 1. SISSEJUHATUS Lihula valla arengukava on terviklik üldine valla tegevusjuhis, mis määratleb vallavolikogu, -valitsuse ja - asutuste tegevuse eesmärgid, samuti seatud eesmärkide saavutamiseks vajalikud pika- ja lühemaajalised tegevused ning nende üldise pingerea. Kava ülesandeks ei ole valla igapäeva jooksvate ülesannete ja kohustuste üles loetlemine. Arengukava on dokument, mis kujutab endast ühiskondliku kokkulepet valla kui keerulise ja eripalgelise, oma elanikkonda esindava ja teenindava, organisatsiooni töö juhtimiseks ja ühtlustamiseks, jõupingutuste koondamiseks ja olemasolevate vahendite kasutamise tõhususe tõstmiseks. Arengukava annab kõigile asjast huvitatutele teavet valla eesmärkide, eelistuste, vallavõimu ning valla allasutuste poolt ettevõetavatest tegevustest ning võimaldades sellega neil paremini kavandada ja korraldada oma tegevust ning langetada otsuseid. Arengukava eesmärgiks on ka hinnata üldisemalt valla hetkeolukorda ja arenguvõimalusi, ühtlasi tuues välja peamised probleemid ja ohud ning esitada viimaste kõrvaldamise võimalused. Arengukava ei ole kunagi lõplik. Vastavalt inimühiskonnas, loodus-, ja majanduskeskkonnas toimuvatele muutustele tuleb teda pidevalt kohendada ja täiendada. Arengukava on vallavolikogu, -valitsuse ja teiste vallaasutuste tegevuse kohustuslikuks aluseks. Arengukavast
  • Evaluation of the Implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration Regarding Nutrient Load Reductions in the Baltic Sea Catchment Area

    Evaluation of the Implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration Regarding Nutrient Load Reductions in the Baltic Sea Catchment Area

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto The Finnish Environment 524 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Ain Lääne, Heikki Pitkänen, Berit Arheimer, Horst Behrent,Waldemar Jarosinski, Sarmite Lucane, Karin Pachel, Antti Räike, Alexander Shekhovtsov, Lars M. Svendsen and Simonas Valatka Evaluation of the implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration regarding nutrient load reductions in the Baltic Sea catchment area ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE The Finnish Environment 524 Ain Lääne, Heikki Pitkänen, Berit Arheimer, Horst Behrendt, Waldemar Jarosinski, Sarmite Lucane, Karin Pachel, Antti Räike, Alexander Shekhovtsov, Lars M. Swendsen and Simonas Valatka Evaluation of the implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration regarding nutrient load reductions in the Baltic Sea catchment area HELSINKI 2002 FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE The Report is available in the Internet: http://www.vyh.fi/eng/orginfo/publica/electro/fe524/fe524.htm This Project has received funding from the Commission of the European Communities (the European Commission), Helsinki Commission and the Finnish Ministry of the Environment The views expressed in this report represent the opinions of the authors alone, and not necessarily the views of the Commission of the European Communities (European Commission) and the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission. The Commission of the European Communities is not liable for any use that may be made of the information of this report. The Finnish Environment Institute. Evaluation of the implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration regarding nutrient load reductions in the Baltic Sea catchment area. The Finnish Environment 524, Helsinki, 2002. Information included in this publication or extracts therefore are free for citing on the condition that the complete reference of the publication in given as stated above.
  • Kanalisatsiooni Arendamise Kava Aastateks 2009- 2021

    Kanalisatsiooni Arendamise Kava Aastateks 2009- 2021

    Sangaste valla ühisveevärgi ja –kanalisatsiooni arendamise kava aastateks 2009- 2021 1. SISSEJUHATUS 5 2. SISUKOKKUVÕTE 6 2.1 Elanikkond ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Asulate investeeringuprojektid ........................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Keeni asula investeeringud ............................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Lossiküla investeeringud ................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Sangaste aleviku investeeringud ........................................................................ 8 2.2.4 Sangaste valla investeeringuprojektide kokkuvõte ............................................. 8 2.3 Pikaajalise investeeringuprogrammi maksumus ................................................. 9 2.3.1 Maksumuse arvutamise alused .......................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Projektide maksumus ......................................................................................... 9 3. ÜVK ARENDAMISE KAVA KOOSTAMISE LÄHTEANDMED 10 3.1 Õiguslik baas ................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Valga maakonna planeering ............................................................................ 11 3.3 Sangaste valla üldplaneering ........................................................................... 12 3.4 Reovee ärajuhtimise suublad ..........................................................................
  • ESUKA – JEFUL 3 – 1 2012.Indd

    ESUKA – JEFUL 3 – 1 2012.Indd

    ESUKA – JEFUL 2012, 3 – 1: 129 – 154 COLOUR TERM ‘BLACK’ IN ESTONIAN PLACE NAMES Kaidi Rätsep Institute of the Estonian Language, Tallinn, and the University of Tartu Abstract: Must ‘black’ is considered to be the most common colour attribute in place names. The article provides a brief overview of must ‘black’ in Estonian place names. The data was obtained from kohanimekartoteek ‘place names card index’ of the Institute of the Estonian Language. In the index there are 1377 slips beginning with (or containing) must ‘black’, discounting within-parish duplicate slips 1081 place names were found. Altogether, 728 different place name variants were discovered. The most frequent occurrences of must in the nominative case were Mustjõgi ‘Black-river’ (frequency = 26), Mustjärv ‘Black-lake’ (22), Mustkivi ‘Black-stone’ (21), Mustoja ‘Black-rivulet’ (18) and Mustmägi ‘Black-hill’ (16). In the genitive case Musta talu ‘Black farm’ (22) was twice as frequent as the next most common, Musti talu ‘Musti farm’ (11). According to the studied material the most common determinant was talu ‘farm’ (231), followed by mägi ‘hill’ (70), mets ‘forest’ (45) and heinamaa ‘hayfi eld’ (43). Keywords: place names, must ‘black’, colour attribute, Estonia 1. Introduction The idea of searching kohanimekartoteek ‘place names card index’ of the Institute of the Estonian Language, for col- our terms was effectuated by the earlier research into basic col- our terms. Examples of other colours include valge ‘white’, hall ‘grey’, sinine ‘blue’, roheline ‘green’, kollane ‘yellow’, punane ‘red’ and pruun ‘brown’. For dialectal equivalents to basic col- our terms, e.g. ahk ‘grey’, haljas ‘green’, vahane, vahass ‘yel- low’, ver(r)ev ‘red’, see Oja 2011.
  • Koonga Valla Üldplaneeringu Seletuskirja Lisa 2

    Koonga Valla Üldplaneeringu Seletuskirja Lisa 2

    Koonga valla üldplaneeringu seletuskirja Lisa 2 OLEMASOLEVA OLUKORRA LÜHIKIRJELDUS 1. Asend Koonga vald paikneb Lääne-Eesti madalikul. Koonga vald on Pärnumaa loodepoolseim vald. Vald piirneb Lihula, Vigala, Halinga, Hanila, Audru, Tõstamaa ja Varbla vallaga. Valla territooriumi suurus on 438 km 2, sellest põllumajandusmaad ca 19 % ja metsamaad ca 35 %. Teiste valdade ja maakondadega ühendavad Koonga valda riiklikud teed Pärnu – Lihula, Pärnu-Jaagupi – Kalli, Kalli – Karuse, Kalli – Tõstamaa – Värati ja Vanamõisa – Koonga - Ahaste maanteed. Kaugus suurematest linnadest on Tallinnast 125 km ja Pärnust 37 km. Valla keskus asub Koonga külas. 2. Looduskeskkond 2.1 Pinnaehitus ja –vormid Koonga vald paikneb Pärnu maakonna loodeosas ning kuulub Lääne–Eesti madaliku maastikurajooni. Reljeef on valdavalt tasane, kohati nõrgalt lainjas – lamedad paest kõrgendikud ja moreentasandikud vahelduvad soostunud sette– ja sootasandikega. Vaheldust reljeefi toovad rannavallid ja –astangud. Maapinna absoluutne kõrgus on vahelduvalt 13–30 m vahemikus. Maapinna kõrgus on tõusev ida suunas, aga valdav osa alast jääb 0–10 m vahemikku. See on seotud suurte soomassiivide paiknemisega valla territooriumil (Avaste soo absoluutne kõrgus jääb 0–10 m vahemikku). Paekõrgendike servad ja sellel olevate künniste nõlvad langevad kohati astangutena Avaste soo ja Kõima raba suunas. Kohati kerkib soosaari. Silmapaistvaim neist on Avaste soos maalinna künnis, mis kerkib 10 m ümbritseva soo pinnast kõrgemale. Astangutega kaasnevad madalad rannavallid (10–15 m laiuse ahelikuna Avaste soo ja Kõima raba serv). Paekõrgendike nõgudes levivad ulatuslikud sood ja rabad. Pinnavormide loojateks olid mannerjää ja muistne meri. Aluspõhja reljeefi kujunemine on toimunud juba enne jääaega. Mannerjää kulutas paese aluspõhja lainjaks, kuid liikuv jää voolis aluspõhja jää liikumise suunaga rööbiti – nii tekkisid voored (salumäed).
  • Koonga Valla Üldplaneeringu Seletuskiri

    Koonga Valla Üldplaneeringu Seletuskiri

    Koonga valla üldplaneering Koonga valla üldplaneeringu seletuskiri Koostaja: Koonga Vallavalitsus Konsultant: AS Kobras Ekspert: Teele Nigola (volitatud maastikuarhitekt, tase 7, kutsetunnistus nr 089284) Vastu võetud: Koonga Vallavolikogu 28.04.2016 määrusega nr 13 Kehtestatud: Koonga Vallavolikogu 29.06.2016 määrusega nr 21 Koonga 2016 1 Koonga valla üldplaneering Sisukord Sisukord .....................................................................................................................................2 Sissejuhatus................................................................................................................................3 1. Ruumilise arengu põhimõtted..............................................................................................4 2. Maakasutus- ja ehitustingimused ning detailplaneeringute koostamise alused..............5 2.1. Elamumaa........................................................................................................................7 2.2. Ärimaa.............................................................................................................................8 2.3. Üldkasutatav maa............................................................................................................8 2.4. Tootmismaa.....................................................................................................................9 2.5. Puhke- ja virgestusmaa ...................................................................................................9 2.6. Aiandusmaa...................................................................................................................10
  • Kurese Loodushoiutalu Majandamiskava

    Kurese Loodushoiutalu Majandamiskava

    Kurese loodushoiutalu majandamiskava Aprill 2019 Projekti „Terviklikud planeerimislahendused pool -looduslike koosluste jätkusuutlikuks majandamiseks” (LIFE Viva Grass, projekt nr LIFE13 ENV/LT/000189) rahastavad Euroopa Liidu LIFE+ programm, Leedu Vabariigi Keskkonnaministeerium, Läti Keskkonnakaitse Fond i Administratsioon , Eesti Keskkonnainvesteeringu te Keskus ja projekti partnerid. Sisukord Sissejuhatus ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Ala füüsilis-geograafiline iseloomustus ................................................................................................... 3 Asukoht ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Reljeef ja mullastik .............................................................................................................................. 4 Elupaigad ja elustik .............................................................................................................................. 6 Maavarad........................................................................................................................................... 12 Ajalugu ja kultuuripärand .................................................................................................................. 12 Ökosüsteemiteenused ..........................................................................................................................
  • Noorsoopolitseinike Nimekiri Koolidega.Xlsx

    Noorsoopolitseinike Nimekiri Koolidega.Xlsx

    PÕHJA PREFEKTUUR Õppeasutus Noorsoopolitseinik Kontakt Aegviidu Kool Jaana Kuuspalu 6125562, 53359346 [email protected] Alavere Põhikool Jaana Kuuspalu 6125562, 53359346 [email protected] Ardu Kool Eleri Kontkar 6124658, 56660840 [email protected] Aruküla Põhikool Eleri Kontkar 6124658 ,56660840 [email protected] Aruküla Vaba Waldorfkool Eleri Kontkar 6124658; 56660840 [email protected] Audentese Erakool Siiri Sepa/Kerli Kaupmees 6125758 [email protected]/[email protected] Avatud kool Inna Boitsova 6124237; [email protected] Audentese Spordigümnaasium Siiri Sepa/Kerli Kaupmees 6125758 [email protected]/[email protected] EBS Gümnaasium Inna Boitsova 6124237; [email protected] Eesti Esimene Erakosmeetikakool Inna Boitsova 6124237 [email protected] Eesti Hotelli‐ ja Turismikõrgkool Õnne Merilo 6125433 [email protected] Eesti Rahvusvaheline Kool Lee‐Britt Laidna 6125430 lee‐[email protected] Ehte Humanitaargümnaasium Vitali Matvejev 6125408 [email protected] Erakool Garant Anželika Fedoruk 6124175 [email protected] Erakool Läte Jevgenia Arm 6124522 [email protected] Eurogümnaasium Marko Pilder 6125756 [email protected] Georg Otsa nimeline Tallinna Muusikakool Reelika Niklas 6124296 [email protected] Gustav Adolfi Gümnaasium Marlen Miilaste marlen.miilaste@politsei,ee; 6124275 Õnne Merilo [email protected], 6125433 Haabersti Vene Gümnaasium Anastassija Eier 6125678 [email protected]
  • Tourism and Recreation Economy Development Plan for the Matsalu Sphere of Influence for Years 2004-2007

    Tourism and Recreation Economy Development Plan for the Matsalu Sphere of Influence for Years 2004-2007

    Tourism and recreation economy development plan for the Matsalu sphere of influence for years 2004-2007 Collaborative partners: Hanila, Koonga, Lihula, Martna, Ridala and Varbla municipalities, Matsalu Nature Park, State Forest Management Centre, Haapsalu Turism Association and ERKAS Lihula 2004 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 3 Methodical principles4 Fundamental concepts 4 AUDITING OF TOURISM RESOURCES 7 General characterisation of the region 7 Natural resources 11 Activities 11 Cultural and historical resources and activities 12 Tourism-specific and supportive service 12 ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPMENT EXPECTANCY 14 Tourism trends in Europe 14 Portfolio of clients, currently visiting the region 15 Most important positive and negative development trends 17 Portfolio and potential development trends of expected visitors 18 SWOT analysis results 20 DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2004-2007 22 Vision and objectives of development 22 Principles of implementation of the development plan 24 Course of action and activities, connected with the objectives 24 Involvement of the local development plan with national and regional plans 26 Annex 1. Members of the working group 29 Annex 7. SWOT analysis of the local tourism and recreation business 31 2 INTRODUCTION Tourism is considered to be one of the biggest branches of economy in the world. In Estonia tourism economy makes up 8,2% of the Gross Domestic Product and 8,2% of employment (Statistikaamet 2003). In 2000 turnover of tourism services was about 11,5 billion EEK, while internal tourism was making up 3,4% or 400 million EEK (Statistikaamet 2004a) In 2003 there were 3,37 million foreign visitors visiting Estonia, 42% of whom (i.e.
  • The Kaali Crater Field and Other Geosites of Saaremaa Island (Estonia): the Perspectives for a Geopark

    The Kaali Crater Field and Other Geosites of Saaremaa Island (Estonia): the Perspectives for a Geopark

    Geologos, 2010, 16 (1): 59–68 doi: 10.2478/v10118-010-0004-z The Kaali crater field and other geosites of Saaremaa Island (Estonia): the perspectives for a geopark Anto Raukas 1 & Wojciech Stankowski 2 1 Institute of Ecology, Tallinn University, Uus-Sadama 5, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia;e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Maków Polnych 16, 61-606 Poznan, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Island of Saaremaa in Estonia offers highly spectacular geological features that belong to the most interesting in the Baltic Sea area. A unique geological monument on the island is the Kaali meteorite–crater field, formed by nine meteori- te impacts. There are also attractive coastal cliffs, huge erratics, alvars (limestone areas covered by a very thin soil) and well-developed glacial and marine landforms. Limestone cliffs and shingle beaches abound with Silurian fossils and offer great opportunities to fossil collectors. The island is a prospective geopark. During the past few years, the geology of the island has become an intensely studied object of Estonian and Polish geologists. Keywords: geopark, geosites, meteorite–crater field, Saaremaa Island, Estonia Introduction opment. Worldwide importance has the Kaali crater field, the first one in Europe of which The Island of Saaremaa (Ösel in German this origin was scientifically proven by finds and Swedish) is one of the largest islands in of meteoritic iron. The geological/morphologi- the Baltic Sea, measuring 2,673 km2. It belongs cal characteristics of the island, in combina- to the West Estonian Archipelago. The island tion with the peculiar flora and fauna, together has a low population density, with only about with the archaeological, historical and cultural 40,000 people.