SYM18: You Want To Do Your First Nerve
Transfer
Moderator(s): Amy M. Moore, MD
Faculty: Stacy Baker, MOT, OTR/L, CHT, Jayme A. Bertelli, MD, PhD, and Christopher J. Dy, MD, MPH, FACS
Session Handouts Saturday, October 03, 2020
75TH VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1-3, 2020
822 West Washington Blvd Chicago, IL 60607 Phone: (312) 880-1900 Web: www.assh.org Email: [email protected]
All property rights in the material presented, including common-law copyright, are expressly reserved to the speaker or the ASSH. No statement or presentation made is to be regarded as dedicated to the public domain.
Nerve Transfers
Amy M. Moore, MD, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery The Ohio State University
I. Introduction Following high nerve injuries, motor and sensory recovery can be less than optimal. Nerve transfers can provide a distal source of motor and/or sensory innervation closer to the target end organ which allows faster recovery and improved outcome. This course will focus on the use of nerve transfers to restore function. It will include discussion on patient selection, surgical options and techniques (including demonstrative videos/case presentations).
Nerve transfer (def) – transfer of an expendable donor nerve or fascicle to a denervated recipient nerve to restore function to the recipient end-organ (skin for sensation or muscle for motor).
Benefits: 1. Performed closer to recipient target allowing for earlier reinnervation. 2. Can be performed outside of the zone of injury and scarred field. 3. Can be performed on patients with delayed presentations. 4. Avoids interposition nerve grafting which fosters increased regenerating nerve fibers making it to the target end-organ. (1, 2)
Goal: Reinnervation of the target muscle within 12-18 months to avoid irreversible atrophy (3, 4).
Classification of Nerve Injuries
TINEL'S DEGREE OF RATE OF SURGICAL SIGN RECOVERY INJURY RECOVERY PROCEDURE PRESENT
Up to 12 I Neurapraxia No Complete None Weeks
II Axonotmesis Yes Complete 1" per month None
None or III Yes Varies* 1" per month Neurolysis
Neuroma In- Yes, but no Nerve repair, IV None None Continuity advancement graft, or transfer Yes, but no Nerve repair, V Neurotmesis advancement None None graft, or transfer
Some Some Depends on Neurolysis, Mixed Injury VI fascicles fascicles degree of nerve repair, (I to V) (II,III) (II,III) injury (I-V) graft, or transfer
* Recovery can vary from excellent to poor depending on the amount of scarring and the sensory versus motor axon misdirection to target receptors
Principles of nerve transfers: 1. History and Physical Exam: a. Timing from injury b. Extent of involvement (level and degree of nerve injury) c. Current functional limitations d. Presence of potential donor nerves
2. Donor Selection: a. expendable motor nerve b. close to the motor end plates of the target muscle c. large number of motor nerve axons and MRC grade 4 strength d. synergistic muscle function - motor reeducation more straightforward
3. Preoperative Studies: a. EMG/NCS – at 10-12 weeks post injury i. identify extent of injury and recovery ii. identify donors intact
Pearls and Pitfalls: • Remind anesthesiologist—no long acting paralytics • Short or no tourniquet use to avoid neurapraxia and inability to stimulate nerves • Evaluate recipient with nerve stimulator before transection • Evaluate donor with nerve stimulator to confirm function and strength • “Donor DISTAL, Recipient PROXIMAL” • Perform coaptations without tension.
II. A list of common injury patterns and treatment options (both nerve transfer and traditional treatment options):
Upper plexus injury—loss of elbow flexion: • Double fascicular nerve transfer (from median and ulnar nerves to biceps and brachialis nerve branches) • Transfer of triceps, latissimus or pectoralis nerve branches to the elbow flexors; Steindler flexorplasty, long nerve grafts
Upper plexus injury—loss of shoulder function: • Spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve and triceps to deltoid nerve branch transfers • Shoulder fusion, Saha procedure, long nerve grafts
Lower plexus injury—loss of pronation • Brachialis or extensor carpi radialis brevis (if C7 is spared) to pronator nerve branch transfer • Biceps, brachioradialis or brachialis muscle rerouting
Lower plexus injury—loss of thumb and index finger flexion • Supinator branch to anterior interosseous nerve transfer • Brachialis branch to anterior interosseous nerve transfer • Tendon transfers (brachioradialis to flexor pollicis longus and extensor carpi radialis longus to index flexor digitorum profundus)
Axillary nerve injury • Triceps, medial pectoral or thoracodorsal nerve to axillary nerve transfer • Shoulder fusion, long nerve grafts
Radial nerve injury • Median (flexor carpi radialis, flexor digitorum superficialis branches) to radial (extensor carpi radialis brevis and posterior interosseous nerve branches) nerve transfers • Tendon transfers (pronator teres to extensor carpi radialis brevis, palmaris longus to extensor pollicis longus, and flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor carpi radialis or flexor digitorum superficialis to extensor digitorum communis)
Loss of median innervated pronation • extensor carpi radialis brevis to pronator teres branch • Biceps, brachialis or brachialis muscle rerouting
Loss of median innervated thumb and finger flexion • Supinator or brachialis to anterior interosseous nerve branch (combine w/ tenodesis of long to ring/small flexors) • Tendon transfers (brachioradialis or extensor carpi radialis longus to flexor pollicis longus and side to side tenodesis with ulnar flexor digitorum profundus or extensor carpi radialis longus to index/long flexor digitorum profundus)
Isolated AIN injury • flexor digitorum superficialis to anterior interosseous nerve branch • brachioradialis to flexor pollicis longus tendon transfer and flexor digitorum profundus tenodesis, fusion of interphalangeal joint of thumb
Distal median nerve injury • AIN to median motor branch • Opponensplasty
Distal ulnar nerve injury • anterior interosseous nerve to ulnar nerve deep motor branch • Static and dynamic claw hand correction procedures
III. Nerve Transfers to Restore of Elbow Flexion (Musculocutaneous Nerve)
Double Fascicular Transfer – our preferred operation when hand function is preserved. a. FCU fascicle to biceps branch of musculocutaneous b. FCR/FDS fascicle to brachialis branch of musculocutaneous
Figure 1. Double fascicular transfer demonstrating FCU fascicle to biceps branch and FCR fascicle to brachialis branch of musculocutaneous nerve
Pearls and Pitfalls: • Use handheld stimulator to identify donor fascicles as well as to ensure adequate function is remaining in the donor nerve • Avoid downgrading function of donor – ensure MRC grade 4 strength • Understand the topography of the median and ulnar nerves in the upper arm. Hint: the donor fascicles on ulnar and median nerve face each other. • Neurolyse the LABC branch away from coaptation to avoid axon loss down the sensory pathway. • “Donor DISTAL, Recipient PROXIMAL” • Perform coaptations without tension.
IV. Nerve Transfers to Restore Radial Nerve Function
Key Points • Patient Selection is key: Needs to be willing to wait for reinnervation window of 6-9 months (in contrast to 4-8 weeks with tendon transfers) • As with tendon transfers – synergistic transfers should be performed: FCR/PL to PIN and FDS to ECRB • Tensionless repair
V. High Median Nerve Injury
Nerve Transfers to restore hand function 1. Brachialis branch to anterior interosseous nerve transfer.(8) a. For patients with intact, strong elbow flexion b. Restores FPL and FDP to the index (and sometimes long finger) c. While coaptation is performed at level of arm, more extensile dissection of median nerve and branches is often required to avoid inadvertent innervation of non-critical median fascicles (sensory, FDS/FCR or other branches)
Figure 5. Transfer of the brachialis branch to the anterior interosseous nerve.
VI. Sensory Nerve Transfers
Sensory donor nerve a. non-critical sensory distribution b. pure sensory nerve c. good size match between donor and target nerve d. common sensory nerve transfers e. Nerve to the 4th webspace to 1st web space transfer to restore sensation to the radial side of the index and ulnar side of the thumb f. End-to-side repair of 2nd and 3rd web space to ulnar digital nerve to the small to restore sensation to the 2nd and 3rd web spaces g. End-to-side repair of ulnar sensory and dorsal ulnar sensory nerves to median nerve to restore sensation to the small and ring fingers and ulnar dorsal skin
VII. Tips and Pearls of Nerve Transfers
“Donor distal, recipient proximal”:
• this concept is crucial to ensuring adequate length is obtained • the donor nerve is cut at it’s distal-most useful portion • the recipient nerve is divided proximally enough so that it can be mobilized • this avoids interpositional grafts, which could substantially downgrade results
Tension-free repair: • nerve repair must be tension-free and allow full passive range of motion at the time of surgery • tension will dramatically downgrade the functional outcome
Align fascicles of the same modality (motor or sensory): • crucial for successful recovery of function
Natural cleavage planes: • between critical fascicle groups • often identified by prominent longitudinal microvessels • can also be identified by tapping micro-forceps gently across the transverse diameter of the nerve • the forceps will “fall” into the natural cleavage plane
End-to-Side Repairs: • A: motor donor nerves must be subjected to axotomy or a compressive stimulus for clinically relevant and timely regeneration to occur through an end-to-side repair • B: sensory nerves demonstrate spontaneous collateral sprouting which can occur without axonal injury to the donor nerve o The greater the perineurial window, the greater the collateral sprouting
Figure 6. Types of end-to-side repairs.
VIII. Rehabilitation following Nerve Transfers (9)
1. Early Post-operative Management • Early range of motion is important to prevent adhesions at the nerve repair site • Postoperative dressing is removed 2 to 3 days following surgery and begin active/passive range of motion of uninvolved joints • Protect repair site with a splint or sling for 7-14 days • Following immobilization - regain and maintain full passive range of motion • If tendons are transferred or repaired concomitantly then these tendon procedures dictate the immobilization (4 weeks shoulder immobilization if pectoralis major resuspended)
2. Late Stage Rehabilitation - Sensory & Motor Reeducation • Alteration in cortical mapping following nerve injury • Following reinnervation, can regain cortical area by increasing the sensory/motor input • motor re-education: need to increase muscle strength and central mechanisms controlling motor function • nerve-to-nerve transfer – requires motor re-education similar to that required with tendon transfers • biofeedback more useful than muscle stimulation • to facilitate re-learning, begin on unaffected side • initially need to contract muscle from donor nerve to achieve a contraction in the recipient muscle • aim for control and initiation of muscle contraction • be aware of unwanted co-contraction of antagonistic muscles • biofeedback – visual and audio • begin in gravity assisted or gravity eliminated positions and progress to exercises against gravity and progressive resisted exercises • dissociate target muscle from donor muscle contraction • strengthen uninjured muscles weakened from disuse (i.e. scapular muscles)
Pearls and Pitfalls: Sensory reeducation • Begin by increasing the sensory input to the appropriate sensory distribution with different textures of material • Progress to localization exercises and finally discriminatory tasks • Cortical retraining requires repetition and purposeful movement
Motor reeducation • need to increase muscle strength and central mechanisms controlling motor function • nerve to nerve transfer – requires motor reeducation similar to that required with tendon transfers • restore muscle balance – be aware of co-contraction of antagonist muscles, strengthen muscles weakened by disuse • biofeedback more useful than muscle stimulation
References
Also see: http://nervesurgery.wustl.edu/Pages/default.aspx
1. Tung TH, Mackinnon SE. Nerve transfers: indications, techniques, and outcomes. The Journal of hand surgery. 2010;35(2):332-41. Epub 2010/02/10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.002. PubMed PMID: 20141906. 2. Moore AM. Nerve Transfers to Restore upper Extremity Function: A Paradigm Shift. Frontiers in neurology. 2014;5:40. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00040. PubMed PMID: 24744749; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3978351. 3. Boyd KU, Nimigan AS, Mackinnon SE. Nerve reconstruction in the hand and upper extremity. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2011;38(4):643-60. Epub 2011/10/29. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.07.008. PubMed PMID: 22032591. 4. Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Nerve transfers for the upper extremity: new horizons in nerve reconstruction. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2012;20(8):506-17. Epub 2012/08/03. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-08-506. PubMed PMID: 22855853. 5. Colbert SH, Mackinnon SE. Nerve transfers for brachial plexus reconstruction. Hand clinics. 2008;24(4):341-61. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2008.07.001. PubMed PMID: 18928885. 6. Belzberg AJ, Dorsi MJ, Storm PB, Moriarity JL. Surgical repair of brachial plexus injury: a multinational survey of experienced peripheral nerve surgeons. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(3):365-76. Epub 2004/09/09. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0365. PubMed PMID: 15352592. 7. Merrell GA, Barrie KA, Katz DL, Wolfe SW. Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature. The Journal of hand surgery. 2001;26(2):303-14. Epub 2001/04/03. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.21518. PubMed PMID: 11279578. 8. Ray WZ, Yarbrough CK, Yee A, Mackinnon SE. Clinical outcomes following brachialis to anterior interosseous nerve transfers. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(3):604-9. Epub 2012/07/24. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.JNS111332. PubMed PMID: 22817905. 9. Moore AM, Novak CB. Advances in nerve transfer surgery. Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 2014;27(2):96-104; quiz 5. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.12.007. PubMed PMID: 24513183.
Is this patient a good candidate? SYM18: You Want To Do Your First Nerve Transfer Christopher J. Dy, MD MPH FACS Washington University Orthopedics @ChrisDyMD
1
DISCLOSURES
Christopher J. Dy, MD, MPH, FACS
Speaker has no relevant financial relationships with commercial interest to disclose.
2
KEY QUESTIONS
1. What is the natural history of this injury? 2. Is reinnervation still possible? 3. Will nerve transfers compromise other options? 4. Is re-education feasible? 5. What is the patient’s timeframe?
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
3
1 WHAT IS THE NATURAL HISTORY?
Will reinnervation occur on its own? If not… • What is anticipated recovery with “traditional” treatments? • Can nerve transfer provide a better outcome?
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
4
IS REINNERVATION STILL POSSIBLE? Time to regeneration Location of injury CMAP findings EMG characteristics Recipient muscle Donor nerve/muscle
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
5
DONOR NERVE CONSIDERATIONS What’s the magic number of axons? 30% threshold? Or is more better? ≥70% is ideal - Schreiber/Wolfe 2015 Injured donors Gradient of injury - Tzou/Chuang 2017 MUAP pattern - Schreiber/Wolfe 2014
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
6
2 WILL A NERVE TRANSFER COMPROMISE FUTURE OPTIONS?
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
7
IS RE-EDUCATION FEASIBLE?
Synergism of donor and recipient Your team High variability in surgeon/therapist experience In general, lack of standardized protocols Need to keep patient engaged during “doldrums of reinnervation”
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
8
IS RE-EDUCATION FEASIBLE? Patient personality: will the patient “get it”? Mental health issues accompany nerve injuries 1/3rd of BPI patients have suicidal ideation (Landers 2018) 40% of BPI patients have new-onset depression or anxiety (Yannascoli 2018) Depression associated with poorer nerve transfer outcomes (Wilson 2016) Patient resources Financial loss after accident 7 in 10 uninsured trauma patients at risk for catastrophic health expenditure (Scott – Annals of Surgery 2018)
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
9
3 WHAT IS THE PATIENT’S TIMEFRAME?
“AMAZING” functional recovery 1.5 years later
“Good enough” functional recovery 3 months later
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
10
KEY QUESTIONS 1. What is the natural history of this injury? 2. Is reinnervation still possible? 3. Will nerve transfers compromise other options? 4. Is re-education feasible? 5. What is the patient’s timeframe?
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
11
[email protected] @ChrisDyMD
nerveresearch.wustl.edu | @ChrisDyMD
12
4 8/25/2020
Jayme A. Bertelli, MD, PhD
Speaker has no relevant financial relationships with commercial interest to disclose
1
My Favorite (and Reliable) Nerve Transfers for High Nerve Injuries
Dr Bertelli Florianópolis-SC- Brazil
2
High Median Nerve Paralysis
Sensibility on the pulp of the thumb and index
3
1 8/25/2020
Pain following nerve injury
• When possible, the site of nerve injury should be explored and the nerve repaired
• Nerve repair can cure pain
• Nerve pain is an emergency and should be addressed before becoming chronic
4
Transfer of radial sensory High High ParalysisNerve Median branches to the proper palmar digital nerves of the median nerve
5
Finger Flexion Reconstruction
Transfer of the extensor carpi radialis motor branch to the High ParalysisNerve Median anterior interosseous nerve
6
2 8/25/2020
• DONOR NERVE • RECIPIENT NERVE High High ParalysisNerve Median
7
• Thenar Reinnervation
8
ADQ TO THENAR BRANCH
9
3
8/25/2020
• High High Median Nerve Paralysis
10
• Tendon Transfer High Median Nerve Paralysis
11
Low Median Nerve Injury
12
4 8/25/2020
High Ulnar Nerve Paralysis
30% of patients have no clawing
No difference in above and below elbow
13 High High ParalysisNerve Ulnar
Sub-terminal Lateral Pinch Terminal Lateral Pinch
Strength deficit of 95% of the normal Strength deficit of 50% of the normal
14
Thumb Weakness
15
5 8/25/2020
Transfer of the opponens motor branch to the terminal
division of the deep branch of the ulnar nerve High High Ulnar Nerve Paralysis
16
Transfer of the opponens motor branch to the terminal
division of the deep branch of the ulnar nerve High High Ulnar Nerve Paralysis
17
Transfer of the opponens motor branch to the terminal division of the deep branch of the ulnar nerve
18
6 8/25/2020
Results
First series (operated withing 30 days) – 90% of subterminal key pinch strength recovery
Second series (operated within 2 and 12 months) – High
50% of subterminal key pinch strength recovery UlnarNerve Paralysis
19
Opponens nerve transfer
3kg Subterminal Key Pinch 0kg
Low Ulnar Nerve Paralysis
20
7 Getting across the Finish Line- Perioperative Rehabilitation, Orthosis Use and Re-education
Stacy Baker MOT, OTR/L, CHT Washington University Occupational Therapy Program Milliken Hand Rehabilitation Center Disclosures
• No Disclosures Overview
• Rehabilitation Approach • Perioperative Rehabilitation • Orthosis Use • Re-education Rehabilitative Approach
Donor Activated Focused Rehabilitative Approach (DAFRA)1 • Phase I – Pre/Post op • Phase 2 • Phase 3
• Theory based on anatomy, cortical plasticity and motor relearning2 Phase 1: Perioperative Rehab
Thorough Evaluation
• ROM • Muscle Strength of potential donors • Sensibility Testing Phase 1: Perioperative Rehab
Patient Education • Anatomy • Relationship of nerve/muscle • Set realistic expectations
Manual Muscle Test
Edema Management3 • Address early • Prevention scar tissue Phase 1: Perioperative Rehab
Pain management • Heat vs cold • Compression
Coritical Re-Organization2,4,5 • Tactile stimulation • GMI • Motor relearning strategies Phase 1: Perioperative Rehab
Looking at the Donor • Strengthening/Activation of the donor muscle(s)
FDS strengthening ECRB Strengthening Pronator Strengthening Phase 1: Pre and/or Post Operative
Patterning • Motor Relearning Strategies2,4 • Combine movements (passive recipient and active donor) • Use cortical plasticity to train the brain to understand these two motion go together to prepare the nerve transfer • Perform Frequently2,4
Median to Radial Combo WF with finger/thumb extension Phase 1: Pre and/or Post Operative
Muscle Imbalance • Early intervention is the key • PROM of joints
Joint Contractures • Stretching orthosis
Positioning • Resting position – day/night • Sleeping Phase 1: Orthosis
Radial Top Reasons for Orthosis • Promote function • Maintain muscle length • Prevent contractures Median
Ulnar Phase 2: Re-Education
Phase 2: Monitoring for return of function • Initiated when a twitch is noted in the recipient muscle • Continue Phase 1 • Low reps/high frequency exercises • Educate on respecting fatigue Phase 2: Re-Education
Rehab techniques • Place and Hold • Bilateral exercises • Relate to functional activities • Advance resistance for donor muscles Phase 3: Re-Education
Phase 3: Resistive Exercises • Progress once 3/5 Muscle strength is achieved • Advance to BTE Program or Strengthening Program • Respect fatigue • Thank You References
1. Kahn, L.C. and Moore, A.M., 2016. Donor Activation Focused Rehabilitation Approach. Hand Clinics, 32(2), 263-277.
2. Anastakis, D.J., Malessy, M.J., Chen, R., and Davis, K.D., 2008. Cortical Plasticity Following Nerve Transfer in the Upper Extremity. Hand Clinics, 24(4), 425-444.
3. Villeco JP. 2012. Edema: a silent but important factor. Journal of Hand Therapy, 25(2), 153-162.
4. van Meeteren, et al, Exercise Training improves functional recovery and motor nerve conduction velocity after sciatic nerve crush lesion in the rat, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1997, 78:70-77.
5. Nudo, Plautz and Frost, 2001. Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Nerve and Muscle, 24: 1000–1019, 2001. 8/31/2020
DISCLOSURES
Amy M. Moore, MD
Speaker has no relevant financial relationships with commercial interest to disclose.
1
SYM18: You Want to Do Your First Nerve Transfer
Cases and Top 10
Amy M. Moore, MD FACS Christopher J. Dy, MD, MPH FACS Jayme A. Bertelli, MD PhD Stacy Baker MOT, OTR/L, CHT
2
Case 1
• 42 yo 3 month s/p MVC • Left brachial plexus injury
• On exam: • Lacks Shoulder • Elbow Flexion
3
1 8/31/2020
Studies?
4
EMG
5
CT Myelogram
C5 Avulsion C6 Avulsion
6
2 8/31/2020
Surgical Plan?
• Reconstructive Goals? • Elbow Flexion • Double Fascicular Transfer • Shoulder External Rotation • SAN- SSC • Shoulder Abduction • Triceps to Axillary
7
Median and Ulnar Fascicular Anatomy
(n) FDS/FCR
(n) pronator teres
(n)Musculocutaneous
(n) median
(n) AIN (n) FCU
(n) ulnar
Tung TH, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Nerve transfers to the biceps and brachialis nerves improve elbow flexion strength following brachial plexus injuries. J Neurosurg 98:313-318, 2003.
8
9
3 8/31/2020
Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer
10
Posterior Approach (End-to-end)
Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer
(n) spinal accessory (n) spinal accessory
(n) suprascapular (n) suprascapular
11
Triceps Branch to Axillary Nerve Transfer
(n) deltoid branches
(n) superior lateral cutaneous
(n) axillary (n) teres minor branch (n) superior lateral (m) teres major cutaneous
(n) medial triceps branch
(n) medial triceps branch
12
4 8/31/2020
Outcomes
13
10 steps for success with nerve transfers
14
#1. Recognize the Injury
• Time = Muscle • REFERRALS • Educate
15
5 8/31/2020
#2 Build Relationship with Neurologist
• Critical to understand injury/ recovery • More important: Potential donors
Radial and Ulnar Nerves intact
16
#3. Appropriate Patient Selection
• Goals of Patient • Occupation • Time for Regeneration • Access to Therapy?
17
#4 Develop Plan
• Identify Donors • Serial Examinations • Review EMGs/NCS • Prioritize Function 4 months
18
6 8/31/2020
#5 Phone a Friend
• Share Ideas • Sound plan?
19
#6 Know your anatomy
• Cadaver Dissections • Courses ( ASSH) • Videos • “Be Aware”
20
#7 Remember Intraoperative Pearls
• “Donor Distal, Recipient Proximal” • No Tension • Release distal entrapments
CTR
21
7 8/31/2020
#8 Engage your Hand Therapist
• Motor re-education • Sensory re-education • Splinting • Joint suppleness
22
#9 Close Follow-Up
• Be the Cheerleader • Encourage PT/OT
23
#10 Critical Analysis Of Results
• Keep records • Take videos • Compare to published data • Keep INNOVATING
ECRB to AIN
24
8 8/31/2020
Thank You! Columbus, OH
Saint Louis, MO
25
9