Use and Characteristics of Herbicides for Non-Crop Weed Control

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Use and Characteristics of Herbicides for Non-Crop Weed Control Use and Characteristics of Herbicides for Non-crop Weed Control PENN STATE Department of Horticulture - College of Agricultural Sciences Uses and Characteristics of Herbicides for Non-crop Weed Control Prepared by: Art Gover Department of Horticulture The Pennsylvania State University To the User of this Publication This document provides information about herbicides and their uses, primarily for use as a study guide for applicators seeking certification in Pennsylvania Categories 10 - Rights-of-Way, or 14 - Industrial Weed Control. This document does not provide instructions or directions for use. Directions for use for any pesticide product are contained only in the label. Do not use any pesticide without carefully reading the label. If information in this document is in conflict with the information in a product's label, then this document is in error, and the incorrect information must be disregarded (and hopefully brought to the attention of the author). To the best of the author's knowledge, the information in this document is current as of May, 2000. Although the intent is for this document to be exhaustive, there are surely products that have been omitted through ignorance - not intent. Inclusion or omission of a product in this document does not constitute a recommendation, or lack of a recommendation regarding the use of that product. Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................1 Integrated Pest Management and Integrated Vegetation Management...........................................................1 Integrated Vegetation Management......................................................................................................1 IVM and Total Vegetation Control.......................................................................................................2 IVM and Selective Vegetation Management.........................................................................................3 Summary.............................................................................................................................................3 Herbicide Use Properties..............................................................................................................................4 Herbicide Formulations.......................................................................................................................4 Herbicide Application..........................................................................................................................5 Summary.............................................................................................................................................6 Herbicide Mode of Action............................................................................................................................7 Systemic vs. Contact Herbicides..........................................................................................................7 Categorizing Mode of Action...............................................................................................................7 Herbicide Resistance...................................................................................................................................11 Herbicides Available for Non-crop Use, by Product...................................................................................13 Herbicides Available for Non-crop Use, by Active Ingredient.....................................................................15 Summary of Herbicide Toxicity and Reaction to Inorganic Materials.........................................................18 Summary of Herbicide Behavior in Soils....................................................................................................19 Summary of Labeled Uses, by Product.......................................................................................................21 Individual Herbicide Summaries.................................................................................................................25 Introduction The term 'non-cropland' covers a wide range of Selective control is practiced in any non-crop settings - pretty much any area not supporting food, area where vegetative cover is desired. In some feed, fiber, forest, or nursery plantings. We can instances, the intent is to preserve vegetation that divide non-crop areas into those requiring non- was planted, such as turf along a limited-access selective control, and those requiring selective highway. The alternate scenario is an area where control. only certain vegetation is undesirable, and is selectively removed from the desirable, or non- Examples of areas where non-selective control, problem vegetation. An electric ROW is a common or total vegetation control is practiced include example of this, as trees that could grow to contact fencelines, highway guiderails, railroad ballast, the conductors are eliminated, while most shrubs, unpaved parking or storage areas, electric sub- and herbaceous plants are desirable. stations, petroleum tank farms, and the grounds surrounding industrial facilities. Regardless of the non-crop setting, the principles of Integrated Pest Management should Some of the reasons for practicing total be followed. vegetation control include ease of maintenance, ease of access, visibility, maintaining surface drainage, reducing fire hazard, and eliminating cover for vermin. Integrated Pest Management and Integrated Vegetation Management Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a means A pest threshold is the level at which a pest to take a structured approach to common sense-, or becomes damaging enough to warrant control preventive pest control. IPM stresses using all efforts. In a commodity setting, this threshold is methods that are practically available, in a economic - it is the level where the yield loss coordinated, or integrated manner, to manage pests. caused by a pest is equal to the cost of controlling it. It does not make economic sense to implement a The stress is on the concept of management. control practice that costs more than the damage a Any ecosystem has many natural forces interacting pest is going to cause. in a constantly changing manner. IPM stresses encouraging or enhancing the natural forces that When pest thresholds have been set, scouting is work to our benefit, and trying as much as possible required to determine if pest levels are approaching to allow these natural processes to work in concert the threshold. Once a pest management effort has with our inputs. been made, it is necessary to monitor the pest population to determine if the control has been IPM brings together varied control methods, the successful. Keeping effective records of your notion of pest thresholds, scouting, monitoring, and scouting, control, and monitoring efforts provides record keeping. the information you need to anticipate pest Methods available to manage pests can be problems and gather the necessary resources in grouped into the following categories: advance. Cultural - methods that enhance the growth or Integrated Vegetation Management vigor of desirable species. Integrated Vegetation Management (IVM) is Mechanical - physical processes that exclude, simply adopting the IPM approach and targeting it damage, or remove pests. specifically at the management of troublesome Biological - using one organism to control vegetation. This is appropriate in rights-of-way and another. other non-crop sites because vegetation is typically Chemical - the use of pesticides. the only pest. The following section describes examples of control practices specific to vegetation management. Method Integration Cultural When used in a coordinated fashion, control methods are complementary. Cultural methods are practices to enhance the growth and vigor of desirable species. When the Mowing roadside turf high and infrequently desired species is more vigorous, it can withstand improves turf vigor, reducing weed pressure and the more pest pressure before there is a negative effect. need to use herbicides - judicious use of herbicides Some examples of cultural practices include proper controls established weeds, and therefore the seedbed preparation, adequate fertilization, and reduces the tendency to mow to 'clip' weeds, timely seeding of groundcovers; and increasing the reducing stress to the turf, which allows the turf to height and reducing the frequency of mowing of be more competitive - reducing weeds. utility turf. Treating brush selectively when it is small Mechanical reduces damage to adjacent desirable vegetation. The adjacent vegetation fills in, providing biological Mechanical controls physically remove, control so that brush cannot re-establish, which exclude, or harm target vegetation. Pulling, reduces the need chemically treat brush. mowing, cutting, or digging weeds are examples of mechanical methods. When large brush is mechanically treated, either by mowing, or cutting with a chain saw, following- Biological up with a cut-stubble or cut stump application reduces regrowth from the tree root systems. This Biological control is the use of other organisms allows the area to be re-established to desirable to control pest species. The leaf-feeding beetle vegetation, either naturally or by reseeding. The Galerucella has been introduced into North competition further inhibits regrowth of the brush. America to feed on the
Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Fate of Imidazolinone Herbicides and Their Enantiomers
    Title Environmental Fate of Imidazolinone Herbicides and Their Enantiomers in Soil and Water Mohammadkazem Ramezani B.Sc. Agronomy, M.Sc. Weed Science This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy of the University of Adelaide School of Agriculture, Food & Wine The University of Adelaide Waite Campus, South Australia 2007 Declaration This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying. Mohammadkazem Ramezani ii Abstract Imidazolinones represent a new class of herbicides with low mammalian toxicity that can be used at low application rates, either pre- or post-emergence for the control of a wide range of weeds in broadleaf and cereal crops, and non-crop situations. All imidazolinone herbicides are chiral, containing two enantiomers that derive from the chiral centre of the imidazolinone ring. The inhibitory activity of the R(+) enantiomer is nearly eight times greater than that of the S(-) enantiomer. The use of imidazolinone herbicides has increased in recent years in Australia owing to increased popularity of pulses and the introduction of imidazolinone-tolerant canola and wheat. Concerns have been raised about the potential carry over damage to the subsequent crops grown in rotation with legumes and herbicide tolerant crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Imazapic/Imazapyr and Other Herbicides in Mixtures for The
    Efficacy of imazapic/imazapyr and other herbicides in mixtures for the control of Digitaria insularis prior to soybean sowing Efectividad de imazapic/imazapyr y otros herbicidas en mezclas para el control de Digitaria insularis en pre-siembra de soya Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht1, Leandro Paiola Albrecht1, André Felipe Moreira Silva²*, Romulo Augusto Ramos³, Everson Pedro Zeny³, Juliano Bortoluzzi Lorenzetti4, Maikon Tiago Yamada Danilussi4, and Arthur Arrobas Martins Barroso4 ABSTRACT RESUMEN Herbicide mixtures, use of multiple sites of action, and other Las mezclas entre herbicidas, el uso de múltiples sitios de acción weed management practices are necessary to avoid cases of y otras prácticas de manejo de malezas son necesarias para biotype resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evitar otros casos de resistencia de biotipos. El objetivo de este efficiency of imazapic/imazapyr and other herbicides in mix- estudio fue evaluar la eficiencia de imazapic/imazapyr y otros tures to control Digitaria insularis at burndown before soybean herbicidas en mezclas para controlar Digitaria insularis en la sowing. This field research was conducted in Umuarama, State desecación antes de la siembra de soya. Esta investigación de of Parana (PR), Brazil, in the 2018/19 soybean season. The ex- campo se realizó en Umuarama, Estado de Paraná (PR), Brasil, periment was conducted in a randomized block experimental en la cosecha de soya de 2018/19. El experimento se realizó en design with four replicates and 11 treatments composed of the un diseño experimental de bloques al azar, con cuatro repe- application of glyphosate, clethodim, haloxyfop, imazapic/ ticiones y 11 tratamientos, compuestos por la aplicación de imazapyr, glufosinate, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), glifosato, cletodim, haloxifop, imazapic/imazapir, glufosinato, dicamba, triclopyr, and saflufenacil, in mixtures.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet
    SAFETY DATA SHEET According to JIS Z 7253:2019 Revision Date 18-Aug-2020 Version 3.02 Section 1: PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name Sodium Metaborate Tetrahydrate Product code 198-02395 Manufacturer FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation 1-2 Doshomachi 3-Chome Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-8605, Japan Phone: +81-6-6203-3741 Fax: +81-6-6203-5964 Supplier FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation 1-2 Doshomachi 3-Chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-8605, Japan Phone: +81-6-6203-3741 Fax: +81-6-6203-2029 Emergency telephone number +81-6-6203-3741 / +81-3-3270-8571 Recommended uses and For research purposes restrictions on use Section 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION GHS classification Classification of the substance or mixture Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2A Specific target organ toxicity (single exposure) Category 3 Category 3 Respiratory tract irritation Pictograms Signal word Warning Hazard statements H315 - Causes skin irritation H319 - Causes serious eye irritation H335 - May cause respiratory irritation Precautionary statements-(Prevention) • Wash face, hands and any exposed skin thoroughly after handling • Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection • Avoid breathing dust/fume/gas/mist/vapors/spray • Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area Precautionary statements-(Response) • IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. • If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. • IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of soap and water • If skin irritation occurs: Get medical advice/attention • Take off contaminated clothing and wash before reuse __________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 / 6 W01W0119-0239 JGHEEN Sodium Metaborate Tetrahydrate Revision Date 18-Aug-2020 __________________________________________________________________________________________ • IF INHALED: Remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Imazapyr and Imazamox for Control of Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum Aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc.)
    J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 45: 132-136 Comparison of Imazapyr and Imazamox for Control of Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc.) RYAN M. WERSAL1 AND JOHN D. MADSEN1,2 INTRODUCTION techniques (Moreira et al. 1999). To date, chemical control has been the most effective method for controlling infesta- Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell. Verdc) is an in- tions of M. aquaticum. Contact herbicides such as diquat vasive aquatic plant to the United States that is native to South (6,7-dihydrodipyrido (1,2-a:2’,1’-c) pyrazinedium dibro- America. Myriophyllum aquaticum is described as “stout, stems mide) and endothall (7-oxabicyclo (2.2.1) heptane-2,3-dicar- moderately elongate, partially submersed but with portions of boxylic acid) have been evaluated with mixed results leafy branches emersed (Godfrey and Wooten 1981). Emer- (Moreira et al. 1999, Westerdahl and Getsinger 1988). Con- gent leaves are whorled, stiff, usually with 20 or more linear fil- tact herbicides are typically effective for short-term control, iform divisions, appearing feather-like and grayish green. but significant regrowth of M. aquaticum typically occurs and Submersed shoots are comprised of whorls of four to six fila- multiple applications are necessary (Moreira et al. 1999). mentous, pectinate, red or orange, leaves arising from each Therefore, the use of a systemic herbicide may be more ef- node. Flowers are all pistillate, borne in the axils of unreduced fective in controlling this species. leaves (Godfrey and Wooten 1981). Myriophyllum aquaticum is Imazapyr (2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)5-oxo- dioecious, however only pistillate plants are found outside of 1H-imazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid) is a systemic herbi- its native range (Sutton 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.2.2: Pesticide Application
    9.2.2PesticideApplication 9.2.2.1General1-2 Pesticidesaresubstancesormixturesusedtocontrolplantandanimallifeforthepurposesof increasingandimprovingagriculturalproduction,protectingpublichealthfrompest-bornediseaseand discomfort,reducingpropertydamagecausedbypests,andimprovingtheaestheticqualityofoutdoor orindoorsurroundings.Pesticidesareusedwidelyinagriculture,byhomeowners,byindustry,andby governmentagencies.Thelargestusageofchemicalswithpesticidalactivity,byweightof"active ingredient"(AI),isinagriculture.Agriculturalpesticidesareusedforcost-effectivecontrolofweeds, insects,mites,fungi,nematodes,andotherthreatstotheyield,quality,orsafetyoffood.Theannual U.S.usageofpesticideAIs(i.e.,insecticides,herbicides,andfungicides)isover800millionpounds. AiremissionsfrompesticideusearisebecauseofthevolatilenatureofmanyAIs,solvents, andotheradditivesusedinformulations,andofthedustynatureofsomeformulations.Mostmodern pesticidesareorganiccompounds.EmissionscanresultdirectlyduringapplicationorastheAIor solventvolatilizesovertimefromsoilandvegetation.Thisdiscussionwillfocusonemissionfactors forvolatilization.Thereareinsufficientdataavailableonparticulateemissionstopermitemission factordevelopment. 9.2.2.2ProcessDescription3-6 ApplicationMethods- Pesticideapplicationmethodsvaryaccordingtothetargetpestandtothecroporothervalue tobeprotected.Insomecases,thepesticideisapplieddirectlytothepest,andinotherstothehost plant.Instillothers,itisusedonthesoilorinanenclosedairspace.Pesticidemanufacturershave developedvariousformulationsofAIstomeetboththepestcontrolneedsandthepreferred
    [Show full text]
  • Imazapyr Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment FINAL REPORT
    SERA TR-052-29-03a Imazapyr Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment FINAL REPORT Submitted to: Paul Mistretta, COR USDA/Forest Service, Southern Region 1720 Peachtree RD, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30309 USDA Forest Service Contract: AG-3187-C-06-0010 USDA Forest Order Number: AG-43ZP-D-11-0012 SERA Internal Task No. 52-29 Submitted by: Patrick R. Durkin Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. 8125 Solomon Seal Manlius, New York 13104 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: www.sera-inc.com December 16, 2011 Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................... vii ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS .............................................................. viii COMMON UNIT CONVERSIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................... x CONVERSION OF SCIENTIFIC NOTATION ........................................................................... xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... xii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Chemical Specific Information
    [Show full text]
  • Redox Imbalance Caused by Pesticides: a Review of OPENTOX-Related Research
    Marjanović Čermak AM, et al. Redox imbalance caused by pesticides Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2018;69:126-134 126 Review DOI: 10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3105 Redox imbalance caused by pesticides: a review of OPENTOX-related research Ana Marija Marjanović Čermak, Ivan Pavičić, and Davor Želježić Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia [Received in February 2018; Similarity Check in February 2018; Accepted in May 2018] Pesticides are a highly diverse group of compounds and the most important chemical stressors in the environment. Mechanisms that could explain pesticide toxicity are constantly being studied and their interactions at the cellular level are often observed in well-controlled in vitro studies. Several pesticide groups have been found to impair the redox balance in the cell, but the mechanisms leading to oxidative stress for certain pesticides are only partly understood. As our scientific project “Organic pollutants in environment – markers and biomarkers of toxicity (OPENTOX)” is dedicated to studying toxic effects of selected insecticides and herbicides, this review is focused on reporting the knowledge regarding oxidative stress-related phenomena at the cellular level. We wanted to single out the most important facts relevant to the evaluation of our own findings from studies conducted onin vitro cell models. KEY WORDS: antioxidants; apoptosis; glyphosate; in vitro; neonicotinoids; organophosphates; oxidative stress; pyrethroids; reactive oxygen species Over the years, population growth and changes in food (HrZZ), is dedicated to studying the toxic effects of two consumption patterns have challenged agricultural major pesticide classes with three subgroups each: (A) production to meet the demand for food and quality insecticides (organophosphates, neonicotinoids, and standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Physicochemical Properties of Sodium Metaborate
    ELECTROCHEMICAL RECYCLING OF SODIUM BOROHYDRTDE FOR HYDROGEN STORAGE: PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SODIUM METABORATE SOLUTIONS. by Caroline R. Cloutier B. A. Sc., The University of Ottawa, 1999 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE m THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Materials Engineering) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 2006 © Caroline R. Cloutier, 2006 ABSTRACT The large-scale adoption of a "hydrogen economy" is hindered by the lack of a practical storage method and concerns associated with its safe handling. Chemical hydrides have the potential to address these concerns. Sodium borohydride (sodium tetrahydroborate, NaBH4), is the most attractive chemical hydride for H2 generation and storage in automotive fuel cell applications but recycling from sodium metaborate (NaB02) is difficult and costly. An electrochemical regeneration process could represent an economically feasible and environmentally friendly solution. In this thesis, the properties of diluted NaB02 aqueous solutions and concentrated NaB02 alkaline aqueous solutions that are necessary for the development of electrochemical recycling methods have been studied. The conductivity and viscosity of dilute aqueous solutions of NaB02 were measured as a function of concentration at 25°C. Also, the solubility, pH, density, conductivity and viscosity of the filtrate of saturated aqueous NaB02 solutions containing varying weight percentages (1, 2, 3, 5, 7.5 and 10 wt%) of alkali hydroxides (NaOH, KOH and LiOH) were evaluated at 25°C. Selected experiments were repeated at 50 and 75°C to investigate the effect of temperature on the NaB02 alkaline aqueous solution solubility and physicochemical properties. Preliminary experiments to investigate the effect of glycine (C2H5N02), the smallest amino acid, on the solubility and physicochemical properties of NaB02 alkaline aqueous solutions were conducted at 25°C.
    [Show full text]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Prometon March 25, 2008 United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA 738-R-08-004 Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances Agency (7508P) Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Prometon TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................... 4 I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 5 II. CHEMICAL OVERVIEW................................................................................................................ 6 A. REGULATORY HISTORY ................................................................................................................... 6 B. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION............................................................................................................. 6 C. USE PROFILE .................................................................................................................................... 7 D. ESTIMATED USAGE OF PESTICIDE.................................................................................................... 8 III. SUMMARY OF PROMETON RISK ASSESSMENTS............................................................. 9 A. HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 9 1. Toxicity of Prometon..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Buffer Replacement Considerations
    Buffer Replacement Considerations John Butler NEI Buffer Replacement Replacement of buffers considered as one means to minimize precipitant impact of strainer headloss Buffer Candidates 1. Liquid Systems- a) Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) b) NaOH at reduced concentration (2.5% vice current 10%) c) Sodium Metaborate (NaMB) 2. Granular Systems- a) Trisodium Phosphate crystalline b) Sodium Tetraborate (NaTB) crystalline Lead Replacement Strategies Three primary replacement strategies – Replace TSP with NaTB – Replace NaOH with NaTB – Replace NaOH with TSP All three buffer materials are currently installed and in use at PWRs Role of Buffers in Design Bases Radiological Dose Control – pH > 7 Inhibition of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Austenitic stainless steel – Long term environmental control – pH > 7 Functional Considerations System Design Radiological Consequences Equipment Environmental Qualification Hydrogen Generation Corrosion Control Plant Operation Plant Documentation Evaluation of Alternatives WCAP-16596-NP Identify buffer alternative and TSP, NaOH, NaTB delivery method Liquid, granular Evaluate impact Chemical Precipitant Model on chemical precipitant Containment Inventory formation pH adjustment to > 7 delivery and distribution Design/Functional corrosion inhibition Evaluation boric acid solubility environmental qualification profile Hydrogen generation Analyses to Support Buffer Replacement LAR Buffer provides pH adjustment to > 7 Comparable or better delivery and distribution Comparable or better corrosion inhibition characteristics
    [Show full text]