DOCSLIB.ORG

DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC CORE COURSE History of India, C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC CORE COURSE History of India, C B.A.(Programme) Semester-III HISTORY DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC CORE COURSE History of India, c. 1200-1700 STUDY MATERIAL : Unit I-VII SCHOOL OF OPEN LEARNING University of Delhi Department of History Course Coordinator : Dr. Rajni Nanda Mathew Content Writers Dr. Meera Khare Dr. Madhu Trivedi Associate Professor (Retired) Associate Professor (Retired) Department of History, School of Open Learning, PGDAV College (M), University of Delhi University of Delhi, Delhi Dr. Rakesh Kumar Dr. Shubhra Sinha Associate Professor Associate Professor, Ram Lal Anand College, Department of History, University of Delhi Kamla Nehru College, University of Delhi Dr. Sarbani Kumar Dr. Parul Lau Gaur Associate Professor Assistant Professor P G D A V College (Morning) Ram Lal Anand College University of Delhi University of Delhi Undergraduate Course DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC CORE COURSE History of India, c. 1200-1700 Contents Unit I : Foundation, Expansion and Consolidation of the Sultanates of Delhi c. 13th to 15th century Unit II : Regional Political Formation: Vijayanagara Unit III : Foundation, Expansion and Consolidation of The Mughal State, c.16th to 17th Century Unit IV : 17th Century Transitions: Marathas Unit V : Art and Architecture In Medieval India Unit VI : Society, Culture and Religion Unit VII : Economy and Integrated Patterns of Exchange Course Coordinator Dr. Rajni Nanda Mathew SCHOOL OF OPEN LEARNING University of Delhi 5, Cavalry Lane, Delhi-110007 Unit I FOUNDATION, EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION OF THE SULTANATES OF DELHI C. 13TH TO 15TH CENTURY 1.1 Foundation and Expansion of the Delhi Sultanate (1206 – 1236) The Foundation of Delhi Sultanate The sudden death of Muhammad Ghuri in 1206 by an assasin created a difficult situation for the Turks in Northern India. He left behind an extensive empire that stretched from Ghuri in Central Asia to Nadia in Bengal, and from the Himalayan Tarai to the deserts of Rajputana. However, it is to be noted that in India the Turks were not firmly in control of their possessions. Rather the Turkish hold was precarious. What prevented the infant Turkish empire from being sucked into the whirlpool of destruction in India was the wisdom, boldness and the imagination of Muhammad Ghuri’s trusted lieutenant, Qutubuddin Aibek. Moreover, the defeated Indian ruling class did not have sufficient military strength to take advantage of this opportune moment. Muizzuddin, popularly known as Muhammad Ghuri left no male heir to succeed him but Aibek was his ablest officer. The foundation of the Delhi Sultanate was laid by Qutbuddin Aibek, who after his humiliating retreat from Ghazni thought, of confining his energies to the territories of Northern India. The Turkish empire in Northern India was unique in some respects. The Delhi Sultanate saw a number of rulers who did not originally belong to India. Obviously they had different socio-cultural and religious background. However, the new immigrant ruling class including the Sultans gradually had become an inseparable part of the Indian society. The most significant thing to understand is that even when the new government was based on exploitation the wealth of the country was not drained out as happened under the British rule. The Turks established essentially a military rule in Northern India, which was based on centralized despotism. The Turkish ‘Slave System’ Muhammad Ghuri had no son. His Indian possessions fell into the hands of one of his slave-officer, Qutubuddin Aibek, who became the first Sultan of the newly established Delhi Sultanate. That a slave could have attained such a high status seems rather strange. There was little social stigma attached to slavery among Turks. Often slaves married in the family of their masters and then succeeded them after their death. As such the phenomenal rise of Aibek was neither exceptional nor accidental. It was the result of as unique ‘Slave System’ among the Turks where the talented boys were bought as slaves and methodical trained and carefully groomed for high officers. 1 Sultan Qutubuddin Aibek After the second battle to Tarain in 1192 Qutubuddin Aibek was entrusted with the charge of his master’s Indian dominion. Much of the credit of the Ghurid conquests in India should go to Aibek. He saved Ajmer from two uprisings. He played an important role in the defeat of Jai Chand. Besides, Qutubuddin Aibek captured Koil (Aligarh), Ranthambhor (1195). Badaun (1197-98) and Kanauj (1198-99). Kalinjar, Mahoba and Khajuraho (1202-03). He also occupied Delhi and made it capital of the newly established Turkish empire in 1193. It was Aibek who was formally invested with viceregal powers and promoted to the rank of a malik in 1206. The death of Muhammad Ghuri marked only a change of status for Aibek. who lost no time in exploiting the situation in his favour. He marched to Lahore and formally assumed power as a sovereign of the Ghurid empire on 25 June 1206. The death of Muhammad Ghuri removed the support of a powerful protector and involved Qutubuddin Aibek in the intricate web of Central Asian politics. The Ghurid empire broke up into warring fragments; Ghiyasuddin Mahmud succeeded in establishing his rule in Ghur. Tajuddin Yalduz, another slave of Muhammad Ghuri, laid claims to his master’s Indian possessions. The internal situation, in Northern India was also disturbing. Preoccupied with these affairs, Aibek could not deal effectively with the Rajputs who lately were quite active in recovering their lost political authority. Kalinjar had been recovered by the Chandellas, the Gahadwalas under Harishchandra reoccupied Farrukhabad and Badaun, while Gwalior seems to have been lost to the Prariharas. In 1210 when Aibek died of injuries sustained from a fall from his horse while playing chaugan (polo), the Delhi sultanate lacked political stability and had no effective administration. Yet his contribution is immense as he laid the foundation of the Delhi Sultanate which had an independent status. Aibek was a brave soldier and a competent military general, whose contribution in extending the Turkish empire was unique. Besides it is to be noted that his early training in Nishapur equipped him with refined literary taste as is evident from his patronage of scholars like Hasan Nizami and Fakhre Mudabbir. His generosity was proverbial and earned him the title “lakh bakhsh” (giver of lakhs). As his reign was too short and the difficulties he faced were too many, he did not seem to have made a significant contribution in evolving a solid administrative structure of the Delhi Sultanate. But there is no doubt that he managed the show. Abul Fazl the official historian of Akbar’s reign is all praise for Aibek and sums up his contribution in the following words : “He achieved things, good and great.” Sultan Iltutmish On the death of Aibek, the Turkish faction at Lahore supported Aibek’s son Aram Shah (there is a good deal of controversy whether he was actually the son of Qutubuddin Aibek or not). 2 The nobles at Delhi, led by Ismail, who occupied the post of amir-i-dad (an important functionary of judicial department), invited Iltutmish to ascend the throne. Iltutmish at that time was the governor of Badaun. He marched towards Delhi. But before entering the capital he met the army of Aram Shah. He easily defeated Aram Shah, whose rule lasted only for about eight months (1210-1211) and was of no significance. Shamsuddin Iltutmish was the son of a noble belonging to the Ilbari (ILBARI) tribe of the Turks. He was sold as a slave by his jealous brothers to a merchant named Jamaluddin, from whom he was bought by Qutbuddin Aibek. It is interesting to note that like Aibek, the rise of Iltutmish was rapid. In due course of time he rose to the post of amir-i akhur (master of stables). Iltutmish married a daughter of Qutbuddin Aibek, who after sometime appointed him the muqtai (governor) of Badaun. And finally he succeeded in occupying the throne of the Delhi Sultanate in 1211. The Initial Problems Iltutmish did not find the throne of Delhi a ‘bed of roses’. The death of Aibek had plunged the Delhi Sultanate into confusion. Iltutmish had to start cautiously. His was a task fraught with dangers and difficulties which were not only numerous but of a varied character: internal and external, political and administrative and cultural. However, Iltutmish rose to the occasion. By showing proper understanding and adopting timely measures he provided a fresh lease of life to the infant Delhi Sultanate. The Turkish jandars (guards) of Delhi rose in rebellion and created a difficult situation before Iltutmish. They were, however, taken to task and were finally suppressed. Yet there were other problems also. Yalduz and Qubacha claimed of sovereignty. Bengal shook off its allegiance to the central authority. Ali Mardan assumed royal status at Lakhnauti in Bengal. Rajput chiefs rose in rebellion and ravaged the country-side Jalor and Ranthambhor were first to regain independence. Above all, there loomed large over the north-western frontier the Mongol hurricane that could easily sweep aside the infant Turkish empire in India before it could stand on its legs. That the new Sultan was able to deal effectively with most of these problems is the proof of his ability and tactfulness. Iltutmish was a realist and a shrewd statesman. He followed a policy of caution and compromise. Unwilling to risk a civil war or provoke his rivals, he even compromised his sovereign status by accepting the royal insignia (canopy and baton) sent by Yalduz, Iltutmish bided his time, and followed a defensive policy towards his contenders for the throne of the Delhi Sultanate. However when Yalduz occupied the Punjab and moved towards Delhi he came forward to meet the challenge. Yalduz was defeated at the battle field of Tarain in 1215-16.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Ethnographic Study of Sectarian Negotiations Among Diaspora Jains in the USA Venu Vrundavan Mehta Florida International University, [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-29-2017 An Ethnographic Study of Sectarian Negotiations among Diaspora Jains in the USA Venu Vrundavan Mehta Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC001765 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Mehta, Venu Vrundavan, "An Ethnographic Study of Sectarian Negotiations among Diaspora Jains in the USA" (2017). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3204. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3204 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF SECTARIAN NEGOTIATIONS AMONG DIASPORA JAINS IN THE USA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in RELIGIOUS STUDIES by Venu Vrundavan Mehta 2017 To: Dean John F. Stack Steven J. Green School of International and Public Affairs This thesis, written by Venu Vrundavan Mehta, and entitled An Ethnographic Study of Sectarian Negotiations among Diaspora Jains in the USA, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. ______________________________________________ Albert Kafui Wuaku ______________________________________________ Iqbal Akhtar ______________________________________________ Steven M. Vose, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 29, 2017 This thesis of Venu Vrundavan Mehta is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Eating-In-Delhi
    S No. Premises Name Premises Address District 1 DOMINOS PIZZA INDIA LTD GF, 18/27-E, EAST PATEL NAGAR, ND CENTRAL DISTRICT 2 STANDARD DHABA X-69 WEST PATEL NAGAR NEW DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 3 KALA DA TEA & SNACKS 26/140, WEST PATEL NAGAR, NEW DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 4 SHARON DI HATTI SHOP NO- 29, MALA MKT. WEST PATEL NAGAR NEW CENTRAL DISTRICT DELHI 5 MAA BHAGWATI RESTAURANT 3504, DARIBA PAN, DBG ROAD, DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 6 MITRA DA DHABA X-57, WEST PATEL NAGAR NEW DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 7 CHICKEN HUT 3181, SANGTRASHAN STREET PAHAR GANJ, NEW CENTRAL DISTRICT DELHI 8 DIMPLE RESTAURANT 2105,D.B.GUPTA ROAD KAROL BAGH NEW DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 9 MIGLANI DHABA 4240 GALI KRISHNA PAHAR GANJ, NEW DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 DURGA SNACKS 813,G.F. KAMRA BANGASH DARYA GANJ NEW DELHI- CENTRAL DISTRICT 10002 11 M/S SHRI SHYAM CATERERS GF, SHOP NO 74-76A, MARUTI JAGGANATH NEAR CENTRAL DISTRICT KOTWALI, NEAR POLICE STATION, OPPOSITE TRAFFIC SIGNAL, DAR 12 AROMA SPICE 15A/61, WEA KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 13 REPUBLIC OF CHICKEN 25/6, SHOP NO-4, GF, EAST PATEL NAGAR,DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 14 REHMATULLA DHABA 105/106/107/110 BAZAR MATIYA MAHAL, JAMA CENTRAL DISTRICT MASJID, DELHI 15 M/S LOCHIS CHIC BITES GF, SHOP NO 7724, PLOT NO 1, NEW MARKET KAROL CENTRAL DISTRICT BAGH, NEW DELHI 16 NEW MADHUR RESTAURANT 26/25-26 OLD RAJENDER NAGAR NEW DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 17 A B ENTERPRISES( 40 SEATS) 57/13,GF,OLD RAJINDER,NAGAR,DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 18 GRAND MADRAS CAFE GF,8301,GALI NO-4,MULTANI DHANDA PAHAR CENTRAL DISTRICT GANJ,DELHI-55 19 STANDARD SWEETS 3510,CHAWRI BAZAR,DELHI CENTRAL DISTRICT 20 M/S CAFE COFFEE DAY 3631, GROUND FLOOR, NETAJI SUBASH MARG, CENTRAL DISTRICT DARYAGANJ, NEW DELHI 21 CHANGEGI EATING HOUSE 3A EAST PARK RD KAROL BAGH ND DELHI 110055 CENTRAL DISTRICT 22 KAKE DA DHABA SHOP NO.47,OLD RAJINDER NAGAR,MARKET,NEW CENTRAL DISTRICT DELHI 23 CHOPRA DHABA 7A/5 WEA CHANNA MKT.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 2 Foundation, Expansion and Consolidation of DELHI
    UNIT 2 FOUNDATION, EXPANSION AND Trends in History Writing CONSOLIDATION OF DELHI SULTANATE* Structure 2.0 Objectives 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Conflict and Consolidation 1206-1290 2.3 The Mongol Problem 2.4 Political Consequences of the Turkish Conquest of India 2.5 Expansion under the Khaljis 2.5.1 West and Central India 2.5.2 Northwest and North India 2.5.3 Deccan and Southward Expansion 2.6 Expansion under the Tughlaqs 2.6.1 The South 2.6.2 East India 2.6.3 Northwest and North 2.7 Nature of State 2.8 Summary 2.9 Keywords 2.10 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 2.11 Suggested Readings 2.12 Instructional Video Recommendations 2.0 OBJECTIVES After going through this Unit, you should be able to: • understand the formative and most challenging period in the history of the Delhi Sultanate, • analyse the Mongol problem, • list the conflicts, nature, and basis of power of the class that ran the Sultanate, • valuate the territorial expansion of the Delhi Sultanate in the 14th century in the north, north-west and north-east, and • explain the Sultanate expansion in the south. 2.1 INTRODUCTION The tenth century witnessed a westward movement of a warlike nomadic people inhabiting the eastern corners of the Asian continent. Then came in wave upon * Dr. Iftikhar Ahmad Khan, Department of History, M.S. University, Baroda; Prof. Ravindra Kumar, School of Social Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University and Dr. Nilanjan Sankar, Fellow, School of Orinental and African Studies, London. The present Unit is taken from th th IGNOU Course EHI-03: India: From 8 to 15 Century, Block 4, Units 13, 14 & 15 and MHI-04: 31 Political Structures in India, Block 3, Unit 8, ‘State under the Delhi Sultanate’.
    [Show full text]
  • Mongol Lawâ•Fla Concise Historical Survey
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UW Law Digital Commons (University of Washington) Washington Law Review Volume 23 Number 2 5-1-1948 Mongol Law—A Concise Historical Survey V. A. Riasanovsky Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Digital Par t of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Commons Network Recommended Citation Logo V. A. Riasanovsky, Far Eastern Section, Mongol Law—A Concise Historical Survey, 23 Wash. L. Rev. & St. B.J. 166 (1948). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol23/iss2/9 This Far Eastern Section is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW Soviet society is thought of as a moral or "moral-political" unity; its members are but youths and children, requiring training and educa- tion, Soviet law educates them to a Communist social-consciousness, "ingrafting upon them," in the words of a recent Soviet writer," "high, noble feelings." However repressive the Soviet legal system may ap- pear to the "reasonable man" of American tradition, the importance of the underlying conception of Law as a teacher should not be minimized. 14 Kareva, The Role of Soviet Law in the Education of Communist Conscsousness, BOLSHEVIK, No. 4 (in Russian) (1947). MONGOL LAW-A CONCISE HISTORICAL SURVEY V A. RiAsANOVSKY* Two basic systems of law, one Chinese, the other Mongol, co- existed in Eastern Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Later Mughals;
    1 liiu} ijji • iiiiiiimmiiiii ii i] I " • 1 1 -i in fliiiiiiii LATER MUGHALS WILLIAM IRVINE, i.c.s. (ret.), Author of Storia do Mogor, Army of the Indian Moguls, &c. Edited and Augmented with The History of Nadir Shah's Invasion By JADUNATH SARKAR, i.e.s., Author of History of Aurangzib, Shivaji and His Times, Studies in Mughal India, &c. Vol. II 1719—1739 Calcutta, M. C. SARKAR & SONS, 1922. Published by C. Sarkar o/ M. C. Sarkar & Sons 90 /2A, Harrison Road, Calcutta. Copyright of Introductory Memoir and Chapters XI—XIII reserved by Jadunath Sarkar and of the rest of the book by Mrs. Margaret L. Seymour, 195, Goldhurst Terrace, London. Printer : S. C. MAZUMDAR SRI GOURANGA PRESS 71/1, Mirzapur Street, Calcutta. 1189/21. CONTENTS Chapter VI. Muhammad Shah : Tutelage under the Sayyids ... 1—101 Roshan Akhtar enthroned as Md. Shah, 1 —peace made with Jai Singh, 4—campaign against Bundi, 5—Chabela Ram revolts, 6—dies, 8—Girdhar Bahadur rebels at Allahabad, 8—fights Haidar Quli, 11 —submits, 15—Nizam sent to Malwa, 17—Sayyid brothers send Dilawar Ali against him, 19— Nizam occupies Asirgarh and Burhanpur, 23—battle with Dilawar Ali at Pandhar, 28—another account of the battle, 32—Emperor's letter to Nizam, 35—plots of Sayyids against Md. Amin Khan, 37—Alim Ali marches against Nizam, 40—his preparations, 43—Nizam's replies to Court, 45—Alim Ali defeated at Balapur, 47—Emperor taken towards Dakhin, 53—plot of Md. Amin against Sayyid Husain Ali, 55—Husain Ali murdered by Haidar Beg, 60—his camp plundered, 61 —his men attack Emperor's tents, 63—Emperor's return towards Agra, 68—letters between Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghans and Shaikhzadas in the Nobility of Shah Jahan
    AFGHANS AND SHAIKHZADAS IN THE NOBILITY OF SHAH JAHAN ABSTRACT '% THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF BoCtOr of $I|tlQ£!09l|P IN HISTORY BY REYAZ AHMAD KHAN Under the Supervision of Dr. AFZAL HUSAIN (READER) CENTRE OF ADVANCED STUDY DEPARTiVIENT OF HISTORY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2000 ABSTRACT "AFGHANS AND SHAIKHZADAS IN THE NOBILITY OF SHAH JAHAN" U£e stuffy of !^^q£af ito6ifiiu £a(f aUracietf i£e aiiention of sc£o/ars of atetf/eoaf S7n<fian £isloru antfa aumoer ofooois ana researc£papers £aoe aureaau Seen puolisoeff. JiowLeoer, auaosl all l£ese slutfies are aeoo/ea lo present l£e role of various racial groups present in t£e nooifitu as a wnofe. S>n recent uears attempts £aoe also oeen maoe to stutfa in tfetail t£e role of important racial yroups indepentfentfu. U£e two prominent racial groups Grants antf Uuranis £aoe Been stutfieff t£oroug£Ju so also t£e Uia/puts out t£e ot£er ta>o local elements C9fq£ans ana dntfian JKas/ims £ave not receioeJ <fue atte.ition. 3n t£e present morJl ate £aoe attempted to prooiife a tfetaife<f a€Xount of t£e position of C^f£yans antf Sfotfian 9lCusfims in t£e noSifity of S£a£ ^a£an. Jfoweoer, it is important to note t£at no suc£ study is aoaifaofe for t£e reiqns of OSaoar, Jfantayun^ ^£oar and ^a£aayir afso. \j£erefore in our introduction we £ad discussedt£ouq£ orieffu about t£eir position duriny earfier period.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomadic Incursion MMW 13, Lecture 3
    MMW 13, Lecture 3 Nomadic Incursion HOW and Why? The largest Empire before the British Empire What we talked about in last lecture 1) No pure originals 2) History is interrelated 3) Before Westernization (16th century) was southernization 4) Global integration happened because of human interaction: commerce, religion and war. Known by many names “Ruthless” “Bloodthirsty” “madman” “brilliant politician” “destroyer of civilizations” “The great conqueror” “Genghis Khan” Ruling through the saddle Helped the Eurasian Integration Euroasia in Fragments Afro-Eurasia Afro-Eurasian complex as interrelational societies Cultures circulated and accumulated in complex ways, but always interconnected. Contact Zones 1. Eurasia: (Hemispheric integration) a) Mediterranean-Mesopotamia b) Subcontinent 2) Euro-Africa a) Africa-Mesopotamia 3) By the late 15th century Transatlantic (Globalization) Africa-Americas 12th century Song and Jin dynasties Abbasids: fragmented: Fatimads in Egypt are overtaken by the Ayyubid dynasty (Saladin) Africa: North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa Europe: in the periphery; Roman catholic is highly bureaucratic and society feudal How did these zones become connected? Nomadic incursions Xiongunu Huns (Romans) White Huns (Gupta state in India) Avars Slavs Bulgars Alans Uighur Turks ------------------------------------------------------- In Antiquity, nomads were known for: 1. War 2. Migration Who are the Nomads? Tribal clan-based people--at times formed into confederate forces-- organized based on pastoral or agricultural economies. 1) Migrate so to adapt to the ecological and changing climate conditions. 2) Highly competitive on a tribal basis. 3) Religion: Shamanistic & spirit-possession Two Types of Nomadic peoples 1. Pastoral: lifestyle revolves around living off the meat, milk and hides of animals that are domesticated as they travel through arid lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicles of Rajputana: the Valour, Sacrifices and Uprightness of Rajputs
    Quest Journals Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science Volume 9 ~ Issue 8 (2021)pp: 15-39 ISSN(Online):2321-9467 www.questjournals.org Research Paper Chronicles of Rajputana: the Valour, Sacrifices and uprightness of Rajputs Suman Lakhani ABSTRACT Many famous kings and emperors have ruled over Rajasthan. Rajasthan has seen the grandeur of the Rajputs, the gallantry of the Mughals, and the extravagance of Jat monarchs. None the less history of Rajasthan has been shaped and molded to fit one typical school of thought but it holds deep secrets and amazing stories of splendors of the past wrapped in various shades of mysteries stories. This paper is an attempt to try and unearth the mysteries of the land of princes. KEYWORDS: Rajput, Sesodias,Rajputana, Clans, Rana, Arabs, Akbar, Maratha Received 18 July, 2021; Revised: 01 August, 2021; Accepted 03 August, 2021 © The author(s) 2021. Published with open access at www.questjournals.org Chronicles of Rajputana: The Valour, Sacrifices and uprightness of Rajputs We are at a fork in the road in India that we have traveled for the past 150 years; and if we are to make true divination of the goal, whether on the right hand or the left, where our searching arrows are winged, nothing could be more useful to us than a close study of the character and history of those who have held supreme power over the country before us, - the waifs.(Sarkar: 1960) Only the Rajputs are discussed in this paper, which is based on Miss Gabrielle Festing's "From the Land of the Princes" and Colonel James Tod's "Annals of Rajasthan." Miss Festing's book does for Rajasthan's impassioned national traditions and dynastic records what Charles Kingsley and the Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Alauddin Khalji's Conquest of Malwa
    Alauddin Khalji's conquest of Malwa Alauddin Khilji: the greatest ruler of the Khilji Dynasy in India! Alauddin Khilji (d.o.b. unknown-1316) was the greatest ruler of the Khilji Dynasy in India. During his reign, he successfully invaded 6 territories, conquering all of these territories in Northern India. Khilji also conquered territories in Southern India as well. After all of the conquests of India, he took control of all of the nobility. Khilji died of edema. Alauddin Khilji was born in Delhi in 1266 CE, lived his entire life in the Indian subcontinent, and ruled as sultan of Delhi from 1296 CE â“ 1316 CE. By any definition, he would have to be called an Indian monarch, not a foreign invader. As a ruler, he would prove himself to be one of Indiaâ™s greatest warrior kings and one of the worldâ™s great military geniuses. Khilji greatly expanded the empire that he inherited from his uncle, Sultan Jalaluddin Khilji, after killing him. Many of his conquests were of kingdoms ruled by Hindu kings, including Chittor, Devgiri, Warangal (from where he acquired the famous Kohinoor diamond), Gujarat, Ranthambore, and the Hoysala and Pandya kingdoms. In 1299, the Delhi Sultanate ruler Alauddin Khalji sent an army to ransack the Gujarat region of India, which was ruled by the Vaghela king Karna. The Delhi forces plundered several major cities of Gujarat, including Anahilavada (Patan), Khambhat, Surat and Somnath. Karna was able to regain control of at least a part of his kingdom in the later years. However, in 1304, a second invasion by Alauddin's forces permanently ended the Vaghela dynasty, and resulted in the annexation of Gujarat to the Delhi In 1305, the Delhi Sultanate ruler Alauddin Khalji sent an army to capture the Paramara kingdom of Malwa in central India.
    [Show full text]
  • Coins of Delhi Sultanate
    Coins of Delhi Sultanate 5.1 Do you know Description Image Source Once the Delhi sultanate was firmly established in the 13th century, Indian coinage underwent a major change. The ancient pictorial tradition of coinage gave way to the so-called Islamic type of coins which were sans any pictorial motif. Islamic type of coins had inscription written in Arabic script on both the sides and furnished more information than their ancient counter parts. It offers Religious and Secular information The Khalji sultan Alauddin Muhammad Shah (1296-1316 CE), discarded the name of Abbasid Caliph from his coins and called himself Yamin- ul Khilafat (right hand of Caliph). The title was used for the first time by an Indian ruler. He also adopted the title of sikander-us-sani (Second Alexander). This indicates that he was well aware of the importance of Alexander, and wanted to be recognised as the second Alexander. Qutubuddin Mubarak (1316-1320 CE), the successor of Alauddin Khalji is known to have issued coins in gold, silver, billon and copper. He made a remarkable change in his coin inscription as he has not only discarded the name of Abbasid caliph but declared himself as caliph and called himself khalifullah (caliph of Allah) and Khalifah rabil alemin (caliph of the lord of the world). He also adopted the title of sikander uz zaman. Muhammad bin Tughluq (1325-1351 CE) introduced token currency in bronze. It weighed around 10 gm. and ruler has asked to accept this bronze tanka at the rate of silver tanka current in the market.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nizamuddin Dargah PIL Cannot Be Conflated with Sabarimala
    6/4/2019 The Nizamuddin dargah PIL cannot be conflated with Sabarimala COMMENTARY / RELIGION Why a PIL on women’s entry at the Nizamuddin dargah cannot be compared to Sabarimala MOHSIN ALAM BHAT 04 June 2019 SARAVANA BHARATHI FOR THE CARAVAN On 6 Decemer 2018, three female law tudent from Pune led a pulic­interet litigation in the Delhi high court, eeking the entr of women (http://www.livelaw.in/pil­in­delhi­hc­eeking­entr­of­women­into­nizamuddin­ dargah­read­petition/) to the inner precinct of the Hazrat Nizamuddin Aulia dargah in the capital. The PIL wa led arel week after a ve­judge ench of the upreme Court lifted the an on women’ entr (http://www.upremecourtondia.nic.in/upremecourt/2006/18956/18956_2006_Judgem https://caravanmagazine.in/religion/nizamuddindargah-pil-women-entry-sabarimala 1/9 6/4/2019 The Nizamuddin dargah PIL cannot be conflated with Sabarimala ep­2018.pd) into the aarimala temple in Kerala. videntl, the aarimala judgement ha had a cacading eect (http://www.livemint.com/politic/new/c­ iue­notice­on­plea­for­entr­of­mulim­women­into­moque­ 1555441362136.html), with the upreme Court now hearing another PIL (http://arandench.com/wp­content/upload/2019/04/Mulim­women­ Moque.pd), led a Mulim couple, demanding that the prohiition on the entr of Mulim women in an moque e declared illegal in India. Hitoricall, policie of ocial reform (http://ook.google.co.in/ook? hl=en&lr=&id=8zXWCgAAQAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=religion+%22ocial+reform%22+te entr+india+contitution&ot=wxqdfi&ig=c5ltaIpeuMgzrx34c_MkviRkY#v=onep entr%20india%20c) have arien from the political ranche of the tate.
    [Show full text]
  • Module -3 the Attack of the Mongols
    Module -3 The attack of the Mongols. The Mongols under Genghis Khan invaded Transoxiana in north-east Iran in 1219 and the Delhi Sultanate faced their onslaught soon after. Mongols attacks on the Delhi Sultanate increased during the reign of Alauddin Khalji and in the early years of Muhammad Tughluq’s rule-forced the two rulers to mobilise a large standing army in Delhi which posed a huge administrative challenge. See, below how both the sultans dealt with these administrative challenges: Alauddin Khalji Muhammad Tughluq Delhi was attacked twice in 1299/1300 and The Sultanate was attackedin the early years of 1302-1303. As a defensive measure, Aluddin Muhammad Tughluq’s reign. The Mongol army Khalji raised a large standing army. was defeated. Muhammad Tughluq was confident about the strength of his army and his resources to plan an attack on Transoxiana. He therefore raised a large standing army. Alauddin constructed a new garrison town Rather than constructing a new garrison town, the named Siri for his soldiers. oldest of the four cities of Delhi was emptied of its residents and the soldiers garrisoned there. The residents were sent to the new capital of Daulatabad in the south. Produce from the same area was collected as tax The soldiers had to be fed. This was done to feed the army. But to meet the expense of through the produce collected as tax from lands maintaining such a large number of soldiers the between the Ganga and Yamuna. Tax was sultan levied additional taxes. This coincided with fixed at 50 percent of the peasant’s yield.
    [Show full text]