THE COMMITTEEMEN of NORFOLK and BEDFORDSHIRE by TOLL IAM STANLEY MARTIN B.A., University of Cambridge, 1970 a THESIS SUBMITTED I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE COMMITTEEMEN OF NORFOLK AND BEDFORDSHIRE 1642-1660 by TOLL IAM STANLEY MARTIN B.A., University of Cambridge, 1970 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in ... The Department of HISTORY We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1976 (c) William Stanley Martin, 1976 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of History The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date 29 April 1976 - ii - ABSTRACT This study of Norfolk and Bedfordshire in the civil war and Interregnum was based on an analysis of the membership of the various committees appointed for the counties between December 1642 and March 1660. The members of the committees were divided into groups for analysis according to the dates of their first and last appointments. The gentry of Norfolk and Bedfordshire, which were both Parliamentarian counties, filled the committees of the 1640s, as they had the commissions of the peace in the 1630s. After the execution of the King in January'' 1649, the membership of the Bedfordshire committees was drastically changed by the loss of almost all the gentry members, while the Norfolk committees remained largely unchanged until I65I-I652. The difference between the counties was traced to the displacement of the secluded MPs- from the committees; the probably voluntary withdrawal of the Bedfordshire gentry; the weaker and more fluid gentry community and the greater penetration of radical political and religious ideas in Bedfordshire. Throughout the 1650s, Bedfordshire was administered by people new to county office, of lower social rank and more radical opinions than their gentry predecessors• Similar new people became important in Norfolk after I65I, but they did not replace the gentry, who retained their role and influence. In late 1659 and early 1660, the gentry in both counties returned to sole control of local government, dis• placing the new officials of the 1650s. A similar pattern in the type of committeemen was observed in both counties: the committeemen appointed before 1649 and in 1660 were of the same social rank as those holding county office before 1640, but the committeemen appointed for the first time I649-I656 were of markedly lower social origins. It was noted that in Bedfordshire, and to - iii - a much lesser extent in Norfolk, these new officials of the 1650s proved a viable alternative administration to the traditional gentry elite. - iv - CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT . ii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ',' ; .' v ABBREVIATIONS vi CHAPTER = 1. THE COMMITTEES AND THEIR MEMBERSHIP 1 2. THE ORIGINAL COMMITTEEMEN, 1642-1648 20 :. 3. THE CHANGE IN MEMBERSHIP, l649"l652 72 4. THE FAILURE OF THE RADICAL EXPERIMENTS, I653-I658 Ill 5. THE RESTORATION OF TRADITIONAL RULE, I659-I66O 136 CONCLUSION 148 BIBLIOGRAPHY 154 APPENDTX 1. Committee Lists • • . • • 1 164 2. The Service of Committeemen 1642-1660 166 3. Committeemen: Entries and Exits 178 4. Groups I - IX: Biographical Data 182 - v - LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Page TABLES Chapter 1: I Groups I - EE 13 Chapter 2: II Status of pre-1649 committeemen 39 III Wealth of pre-1649 committeemen • • 39 Chapter 3: TV The progression from sheriff to mayor in Norwich ..... 92 V Status of committeemen appointed 1649-1656 ........ 97 VI Wealth of committeemen appointed l649_l656 . • 98 Appendix 2: VII The service of Norfolk committeemen, 1642-1660 , , , , , 166 VIII The service of Norwich committeemen, 1642-1660 172 EC The service of Bedfordshire committeemen, 1642-1660 . , 174 Appendix 3s X Norfolk committeemen: entries and exits ........ 179 XI Norwich committeemen: entries and exits 180 XII Bedfordshire committeemen: entries and exits 181 Appendix 4: XIII Groups I-EE, Norfolk: "biographical data 187 XIV Groups I-EE, Norwich: biographical data 188 XV Groups I-EE, Bedfordshire: biographical data 189 FIGURE I The size of assessment committees, 1642-1660 36 NOTE Spelling and punctuation have been modernized, and abbreviations extended, in quotations from contemporary sources. Dates are given in the Old Style, except that the year is taken as beginning 1 January not 25 March. - yi - ABBREVIATIONS API P'.H. Firth and R. S. Rait, eds., Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum BHRS Bedfordshire Historical Records Society Blomefield F. Blomefield, An Essay Towards a Topographical History of "Norfolk BNQ Bedfordshire Notes and Queries CJ Journals of the House of Commons CSPD Calendar of State Papers. Domestic DNB Dictionary of National Biography EcHR Economic History Review EHR English Historical Review HMC Historical Manuscripts Commission LJ Journals of the House of Lords Luke H. G. Tibbutt, ed., The Letter Books of Sir Samuel Luke, NA Norfolk Archaeology NRS Norfolk Record Society TRHS Transactions of the Royal Historical Society TSP T. Birch, ed., Collection of the State Papers of John Thurloe Venn J. Venn and J. A. Venn, eds., Alumni Cantabrigienses VCH Victoria County History - 1 - CHAPTER ONE THE COMMITTEES AND THEIR MEMBERSHIP No English government in the seventeenth century could have afforded to pay, or would have "been able to supervise effectively, an army of local bureaucrats to administer the laws and execute London's directives in the counties and towns. Such a system would have been in any case at odds with the hierarchical nature of spciety, in which deference was given to the natural superiors in each locality. The seventeenth century's solution was to induce the aristocracy and the gentry to administer their districts them• selves, as an obligation of their rank, repaying them with prestige and power. The structure of offices, described many times, need only be summarized here."'" The county was the basic unit of local administration. Each county had a lord lieutenant, though often two or more counties shared one appointee, who would generally be one of the great peers of the realm, and a member of the Privy Council. He was responsible for the military defence of the county and also, in the last resort, for preserving its internal peace. He was in theory a major link between local and central government, but he was commonly absent from his county for so much of the time that this did not happen in practice, and most of his duties devolved on the deputy lieutenants, who were 3 generally prominent local gentlemen. They organized the county into its muster divisions, and supervised the raising of the trained bands and the much less reliable pressed levies. The justices of the peace, the workhorses of the whole system, carried out the bulk of the general civil and legal duties, and were the Council's most useful agents in the counties. The commission of the peace as a whole met four times a year at the Quarter Sessions, but these - 2 - were not meant to last longer than three days, and normally only met for two, so most of the work had to be done by one or two justices together at monthly divisional meetings. The sheriff, the third of the major county officials, had lost much of his earlier importance, but could still be very influential at election time. The shrievalty underwent an unwelcome resurgence of power in the 1630s when the sheriff, as the collector of the Crown's traditional revenues, was made responsible for assessing and collecting ship money.^ The yeomen filled some of the lesser county offices. Each hundred had its high constable, and each village its petty constable, who bore many of the day-to-day 7 responsibilities for administering the laws. The major offices, deputy lieutenant, sheriff and justice of the peace - the level of county government with which this study is concerned - were the preserve of the county gentry, or, more precisely, of a magisterial class within the gentry class itself. The membership of the commission of the peace was customarily restricted to those gentlemen who could write 'esquire' after their names, so that the minor or parish gentry, those who could only style themselves 'gentleman', were normally excluded from the commission. Social rank and local office were thus directly related. The justice of most senior rank would normally be named the custos rotulorum, and would chair the sessions, if he attended. The most prominent among the gentry could expect to be deputy lieutenants and justices of the quorum. The members of the commissions of the peace were listed in order of seniority. One's position in local government was therefore an expression of one's place in the county hierarchy, and the local gentlemen brought what pressure they could on London to be made deputy lieutenants and justices. Appointment to office meant both confirmation and enhancement of one's position, while loss of office often meant a real loss of prestige and power. The gentry of each - 3 - county were intensely interested in all appointments, wanting to ensure that no one unsuitable should become a justice, and resenting the exclusion of anyone who was qualified."'""'" Any attempt by the central government to change the personnel of local government would have been seen as a challenge to the county hierarchy, an attempt to subvert it. The one exception here was the expensive and burdensome office of sheriff, which most gentlemen tried to avoid if possible, while the government, for its part, was satisfied so long 12 as some member of the magisterial class took it on.