DOCSLIB.ORG

47Bun60340404appendix 16 Transport Assessment.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WYNYARD CROSSING WYNYARD QUARTER TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Prepared By: Todd Langwell June 2019 Reference: 19148 Issue C – Final Auckland Office: P O Box 60-255, Titirangi, Auckland 0642 Level 1, 400 Titirangi Road, Titirangi Village Tel: (09) 817 2500 Fax: (09) 817 2504 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Project Information: Client Panuku Development Auckland Job Number 19148 Title Proposed Bridge Replacement - Wynyard Crossing, Wynyard Quarter - Transport Assessment Prepared By Todd Langwell Date June 2019 Document History and SSStatusStatus Revision Date Issued Reviewed By Approved by Date approved Status A 26/05/2019 Todd Langwell 31/05/2019 Draft B 12/06/2019 Todd Langwell 13/06/2019 Updated Draft C 13/06/2019 Todd Langwell 14/06/2019 Final This document and information contained herein is the intellectual property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd and is solely for the use of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd contracted client. This document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied, without the written consent of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd accepts no responsibility to any third party who may use or rely upon this document. Proposed Bridge Replacement Wynyard Crossing, Wynyard Quarter Transport Assessment Issue C – Final Ref: 19148 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND & CONTEXT ........................................................................................ 2 2.1 The Existing Bridge – Purpose, Design & Operation ................................................ 2 2.2 Surrounding Walking Facilities ................................................................................ 4 2.3 Surrounding Cycling Facilities ................................................................................. 6 2.4 Current Walking & Cycling Demands ...................................................................... 7 2.5 Future Walking & Cycling Demands ........................................................................ 8 2.5.1 Summary........................................................................................................ 10 2.6 Adjacent Road Network ........................................................................................ 11 3.0 THE PROPOSAL & DESIGN ASSESSMENT .................................................................. 12 3.1 General Description .............................................................................................. 12 3.2 Suitability of Shared Use ....................................................................................... 13 3.3 Design Width ........................................................................................................ 15 3.4 Design Gradients .................................................................................................. 17 3.4.1 Gradients - Pedestrian Requirements ............................................................. 18 3.4.2 Gradients – Mobility Requirements ................................................................ 18 3.5 Balustrade Design ................................................................................................. 19 3.6 Bridge Opening / Closing Operation ...................................................................... 20 3.7 Bridge Surface ...................................................................................................... 21 3.8 Other Bridge Comparisons & Benchmarking ......................................................... 21 3.8.1 The Webb Bridge – Melbourne, Australia ....................................................... 21 3.8.2 The Sandridge Bridge – Melbourne, Australia ................................................ 22 3.8.3 The Evan Walker Bridge – Melbourne, Australia............................................. 22 3.8.4 The Seafarers Bridge – Melbourne, Australia ................................................. 23 3.8.5 The Millennium Bridge – London, United Kingdom ........................................ 23 4.0 CONSTRUCTION RELATED TRANSPORT EFFECTS ....................................................... 25 5.0 PROPOSED TEMPORARY BRIDGE ............................................................................. 27 6.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 29 Proposed Bridge Replacement Wynyard Crossing, Wynyard Quarter Transport Assessment Issue C – Final Ref: 19148 - 1 - 1.01.01.0 INTRODUCTION The Wynyard Crossing is located within the Viaduct Harbour, to the west of Auckland’s Central Business District (CBD). It connects Te Wero island with Wynyard Quarter adjacent to Karanga Plaza and provides an east/west link for walking and cycling between Wynyard Quarter and Downtown Auckland, while maintaining boat access to the Inner Viaduct Harbour. Wynyard Crossing Te Wero Island Outer Wynyard Viaduct Quarter Karanga Plaza Inner Viaduct Figure 111 ––– Bridge Location Source: wises.co.nz The application involves the removal of the existing Wynyard Crossing bridge which has reached the end of its design life. The existing bridge was designed and consented as a temporary bridge. The existing bridge will be replaced by a new permanent bridge. It is expected that the construction will take approximately 9 months. During this period a temporary crossing will be established to the south of the existing bridge beyond the Tidal steps. The proposed bridge is described in more detail in the Assessment of Environmental Effects attached to application. In summary, it is to be a double-leaf bascule bridge along the same alignment as the existing bridge. Bridge approaches will connect the proposed bridge to land (Te Wero Island and Wynyard Precinct), either side of the double leaf bascule. This report has been prepared to provide an independent transport assessment of the proposed bridge, including its construction and the temporary crossing. It describes the nature of the transport environment into which the bridge exists; sets out and assesses the transport characteristics of the design and its likely impacts on the immediate transport environment. Proposed Bridge Replacement Wynyard Crossing, Wynyard Quarter Transport Assessment Issue C – Final Ref: 19148 - 2 - 2.02.02.0 BACKGROUND & CONTEXT 2.12.12.1 The Existing Bridge ––– PurposePurpose,, Design & Operation The existing Wynyard Crossing bridge was designed and constructed to provide pedestrian and cycling across the Viaduct Harbour. It connects Te Wero Island with Wynyard Quarter adjacent to Karanga Plaza and provides an east/west link for walking and cycling between Wynyard Quarter and Downtown Auckland. It was planned as a temporary bridge and was completed in 2011. It was intended to operate for a 6-year design life when a permanent bridge was intended to be completed. The design of the structure and operating equipment reflected its temporary nature and enabled simple cost- effective construction and subsequent removal in future. From a walking and cycling perspective, the bridge has had significant benefits for several user groups including commuters, recreational users, tourists and visitors. It is therefore important to maintain and a safe and reliable pedestrian and cycle connection and boat access to the Inner Viaduct Harbour. Figure 222:2: Existing Bridge The existing bridge has a total span of 96.0 metres between landing at each. The section of bridge that lifts has a span of 46.0 metres and is slightly offset towards the west of the overall span. The section of bridge that pedestrians need to be cleared from in order for the bridge to be lifted amounts to some 76.0 metres. Proposed Bridge Replacement Wynyard Crossing, Wynyard Quarter Transport Assessment Issue C – Final Ref: 19148 - 3 - The minimum clear operating width through the main and middle span of the bridge that lifts to allow boats to pass is 4.3 metres. Slightly wider approaches (5.0 metres wide) are provided either side of the main span and accommodate control gates that hold pedestrian and cyclists and the cable systems for lifting the bridge. The gate system provides a constrained “gateway” onto the bridge that signals to all users the presence of the bridge ahead and assists in managing speeds of cyclists (including other modes such as electric scooter and skateboards). Immediately outside the bridge structure, the approaches widen to more than 10 metres within Wynyard Quarter (between Karanga Plaza and the former Viaduct Events Centre, now occupied by Emirates Team New Zealand) and Te Wero Island. The existing bridge span provides for various gradients throughout the approaches to and across the bridge with a maximum grade of 1 in 20 (5%). There are no mobility platform respite areas provided through the 96.0 metre span of the bridge and the flat landing areas of Te Wero Island and Karanga Plaza sides of the bridge. Figure 333:3: Bridge Approach & Control Gates The day to day operation of the bridge consists of the bridge being down and open to free movement by various user groups in shared use environment except when being opened to allow marine traffic to pass to and from the Inner Viaduct Harbour. Observations made during peak and off-peak times identify that pedestrians and cyclists generally move freely and in an uncongested manner with little disruption or delay. Cyclists typically
Recommended publications
  • Download Document

    Download Document

    RESOURCE CONSENTSUPPORTAGREEl\lIENT EXECUTIONAND D ATE Executed as an agreement. Date: 5 June 2019 SIGNED by America's Cup Event Limited by: Director Director V\J/t f; '-1;'\.-f Mfi1,\/_$ Print Name Print Name SIGNEDby Panuku Development Auckland Limited by: Director Print Name Print Name 4 4441220_3 CONDITION STAGE WHO GENERAL Definition of terms 3 The consent holder shall appoint a suitably experienced person with appropriate seniority for a period of 10-years from All Panuku commencement of the consent to: (a) Take responsibility for the implementation of the consent conditions; (b) Maintain oversight of the overall programme; (c) Ensure liaison and consultation between stakeholders to the conditions of consent including but not limited to Auckland Council, Council-Controlled Organisations, the Community Liaison Group, the Forum (Condition 5), and the Auckland Civil Defence and Emergency Management Group; (d) Manage the lodgement or submission of documents or reports to the Team Leader Compliance Monitoring – Central where required by the conditions; (d) Carry out appropriate reporting to assist the Council with compliance monitoring; and (e) Take such actions as necessary to resolve any matters arising from the implementation of the conditions. Mana Whenua Engagement 5 Prior to the Commencement of Consent, the consent holder shall invite the mana whenua listed below in c) to establish a Forum to: Pre- Consent a) Assist the consent holder in the preparation of an America’s Cup Kaitiaki Engagement Plan (ACKEP) (Conditions 5A-5F) construction holder consistent with relevant customary practices and in accordance with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti o Waitangi), especially the principles of consultation, active participation and partnership; and b) Fulfil the obligations set out in the America’s Cup Kaitiaki Engagement Plan on behalf of mana whenua.
  • Where Headspace Meets Workspace

    Where Headspace Meets Workspace

    INTRODUCTION 01 PAGE Where headspace meets workspace V Precinct is defined by connection. Where energy meets action, energy is defined by connection. Where V Precinct X V where workspace meets headspace. An intersection of things more workspace meets headspace. An intersection of things more where than the sum of their parts, that we call connected energy. INTRODUCTION PAGE 02 INTRODUCTION PAGE 03 INTRODUCTION 04 PAGE Where Where Where Where energy meets headspace meets business meets design meets action workspace business functionality Aerial of VXV Precinct, where Victoria Park meets the Viaduct meets Park Victoria where Precinct, of VXV Aerial INTRODUCTION PAGE 05 Modern and contemporary spaces INTRODUCTION 06 PAGE VXV Precinct is a new space for a new business energy. It’s a commercial hub that’s perfect for the new breed of progressive businesses – more connected and more dynamic. Here, different categories co-exist, united by a shared passion and energy to take New Zealand forward. VXV Precinct between Victoria Park and the Viaduct INTRODUCTION 07 PAGE Perfectly Placed VXV is at the forefront of the new and The location is moments from key transport Perfectly placed between exciting commercial culture being built routes and amenities, with cafes and spaces Victoria Park and the Viaduct, around the Viaduct Harbour and Wynyard for the mobile workforce, with a low- Quarter areas. VXV itself is a natural home rise campus feel it’s perfectly positioned VXV is home to some of for significant, progressive and dynamic between park and waterfront. New Zealand’s most progressive businesses. businesses. ry er F ar C ke he ai W MAP KEY: VXV Precinct Wynyard Point e Surrounding Developments 1.
  • Section 32 Plan Change 3 Wynyard Quarter

    Section 32 Plan Change 3 Wynyard Quarter

    Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal Proposed Plan Change 3 Wynyard Quarter SECTION 32 REPORT July 2007 Auckland Regional Council Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 2 Auckland Regional Council TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose and Scope of the Section 32 Report 2 STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 2.1 Part II of the RMA 2.2 Purpose of Regional Coastal Plans 2.3 New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement and Auckland Regional Policy Statement 2.4 Section 32 Requirements 2.5 Initial Evaluation of Management Alternatives 3 ASSESSMENT OF PLAN CHANGE 3 – WYNYARD QUARTER 3.1 Purpose of Plan Change 3.2 Summary of Key Changes 3.3 Background Work – Auckland Waterfront Vision 2040 and Consultation Summary 3.4 Do the Objectives Achieve the Purpose of the RMA? 3.5 Evaluation of Policies and Methods – Efficiency and Effectiveness 3.6 Evaluation of Policies and Methods – Costs, Benefits and Risks 4 CONCLUSION Abbreviations used in this report: ACC – Auckland City Council ARC – Auckland Regional Council CMA – Coastal Marine Area HGMPA – Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000 HSEW – Halsey Street Extension Wharf NZCPS – New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 1994 PMA – Port Management Area POAL – Ports of Auckland Ltd RMA – Resource Management Act 1991 RPC – Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal 2004 RPS – Auckland Regional Policy Statement 1999 Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 3 Auckland Regional Council Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 4 Auckland Regional Council 1 INTRODUCTION The Auckland Regional Council (ARC) has prepared a proposed plan change to the Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal 2004 (RPC).
  • 2018 Anzics New Zealand Regional Asm 4 – 6 April 2018

    2018 Anzics New Zealand Regional Asm 4 – 6 April 2018

    ! 2018 ANZICS NEW ZEALAND REGIONAL ASM 4 – 6 APRIL 2018 . THE HILTON HOTEL, AUCKLAND, NZ . WWW.ANZICS2018.NZ HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Convenor's Welcome 4 Thanks To Our Sponsor 5 Auckland Map 6 Our World Class Venue 7 General Information 10 Keynote Speakers 11 Invited Speakers 19 Abstract Awards 19 AGM Information 20 Social Programme 21 Programme Overview 27 Speaker Abstracts 43 Poster Abstract 44 Exhibitor Listing & Floorplan 45 Sponsor & Exhibitor Profiles ORGANISING COMMITTEE Dr Anusha Ganeshalingham Convenor ANZICS 2018 ASM Paediatric Intensivist, Starship Child Health Anusha is a paediatric intensivist at Starship Child Health. Anusha undertook paediatric training both in New Zealand and London where she gained her MRCPCH from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (UK). Upon returning to New Zealand, Anusha completed advanced training with the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in 2013. Anusha first trained in paediatric intensive care medicine at Starship Child Health and returned to London to undertake an 18-month fellowship at the Evelina Children’s Hospital. She became a fellow of the College of Intensive Care Medicine in 2013. In July, Anusha returned from The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, where she undertook a one year Neurocritical Care Fellowship. Key research interests include brain injury with a specific focus on neuromonitoring during extracorporeal membranous oxygenation. Non-clinical interests include hiking and yoga. Dr David Buckley Dr Alex Kazemi Paediatric Intensivist, ICU Specialist, Starship Child Health Middlemore Hospital Nicola Gini Claire Sherring Nurse Unit Manager, Research Co-Ordinator, Starship Child Health Starship Child Health 2 www.anzics2018.nz CONVENOR'S WELCOME It is with great pleasure that I welcome you to the City of Sails for the New Zealand Regional ANZICS Annual Scientific Meeting held on 4-6 April 2018 at the Hilton Hotel in Auckland’s Viaduct Harbour.
  • A Badass: First a Edges Closer B Officially Unveiled C Heritage Protected D Book for Local Author

    A Badass: First a Edges Closer B Officially Unveiled C Heritage Protected D Book for Local Author

    May 2021, Issue 174 The Voice of Postcode 3008 见 26 页 docklandsnews.com.au Forever Free Twitter @Docklands_News “Significant changes” in new plans for Waterfront City words by David Schout the uses, activities, spaces and places PLANNING that support a healthy inner-city community — a genuine piece of Melbourne.” Plans for a major development in “[The plan] assists in facilitating the northernmost part of Docklands AsheMorgan’s reinvigoration of the have been submitted to the state Waterfront City precinct; a process government with “significantwhich was commenced by upgrades to changes” after pushback from the The District Docklands, the delivery City of Melbourne last year. of a state of the art entertainment Initial plans for the Waterfront and dining precinct anchored by an City site, situated next to both eight-screen cinema and, on this site, Docklands Primary School and The the inclusion of a supermarket and a District, featured excessive building fresh food market through the entire size, overshadowing, excessive car ground floor of the existing car park,” parking and a lack of pedestrian the report said. connectivity according to the council In September last year the council in September 2020. made public its concerns about the But under a new blueprint recently development plans. submitted to the Department of These included building sizes, Environment, Land, Water and insufficient setbacks, wind comfort, ▲ Alma Doepel restoration director Peter Harris and ATET director Jake Hughes at North Wharf last month. Photo: John Tadigiri. Planning (DELWP) prepared for overshadowing of public open space, developer AsheMorgan, owners of excessive car parking and insufficient The District, the “scale, intensity and detail in relation to public benefits layout” have all been altered.
  • Annexure02 Viaduct Harbour Urban Design Guidelines

    Annexure02 Viaduct Harbour Urban Design Guidelines

    ANNEXURE 2 VIADUCT HARBOUR URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES ANNEX 2 CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN Page 2 CENTRAL AREA SECTION - OPERATIVE 2004 ANNEX 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................5 BACKGROUND ............................................................................6 HISTORY OF THE AREA..............................................................7 CONTEXT......................................................................................9 OBJECTIVES OF THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES ............12 PUBLIC SPACE .......................................................................................14 PUBLIC SPACE NETWORK.......................................................14 PERMEABILITY ..........................................................................17 URBAN FORM ............................................................................18 MORPHOLOGY...........................................................................20 SQUARES ...................................................................................22 WATERFRONT PROMENADES.................................................27 STREETS.....................................................................................29 LANES.........................................................................................32 VIEW SHAFTS.............................................................................35 CITY BLOCKS..........................................................................................36
  • Daniella Sarkis

    Daniella Sarkis

    GLOBAL VILLAGE 3 - 6 DECEMBER MELBOURNE CONVENTION EXHIBITOR MANUAL AND EXHIBITION CENTRE WELCOME TO THE 2014 WORLD CANCER CONGRESS GLOBAL VILLAGE Dear Exhibitor, Thank you for committing to participate in the 2014 World Cancer Congress that will draw around 2,500 delegates from around the world to the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, in Melbourne, Australia, from December 3rd – 6th, 2014. Please review carefully this Global Village Exhibitor Technical Manual. It is an essential tool that will provide all the information you need to prepare for a successful exhibit in the Global Village, in Melbourne this upcoming December. Please be sure to communicate the information contained in this manual to your agencies and/or contractors. If you have any questions after reading this manual, please contact Mr Yani Amar, your Global Village Exhibit Coordinator, at +41 22 809 1834 or [email protected], and his absence, you can reach Ms Jessica Mathieu at +41 22 809 1828 or [email protected] We look forward to welcoming you to Melbourne, and we wish you a successful Congress. The UICC Congress Team Contents Welcome to the 2014 World Cancer Congress Global Village .................................................................... 2 SECTION 1 – CONGRESS AND GLOBAL VILLAGE ......................................................................................... 5 Welcome to Melbourne, Australia .................................................................................................................... 5 About the Venue .............................................................................................................................................
  • Road Management Plan

    Road Management Plan

    Road Management Plan Version 5 June 2021 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 4 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Key Stakeholders ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Obligations of Road Users ....................................................................................................................... 5 The Act ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Availability of RMP ................................................................................................................................... 6 Codes of Practice ..................................................................................................................................... 7 City of Melbourne Strategic Direction ...................................................................................................... 7 Definitions ...............................................................................................................................................
  • America's Cup, Wynyard Hobson Coastal Processes & Dredging

    America's Cup, Wynyard Hobson Coastal Processes & Dredging

    Report America’s Cup, Wynyard Hobson Coastal Processes & Dredging Technical Report Resource Consent Application, Wynyard Hobson Prepared for Panuku Development Auckland and Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment Prepared by Beca Ltd and Tonkin & Taylor Ltd April 2018 America's Cup Wynyard Hobson: Coastal Processes and Dredging Technical Report Revision History Revision Nº Prepared By Description Date 1 Jennifer Hart, Richard Reinen- Final Draft Issue for Comment 6.04.2018 Hamill, Stephen Priestley 2 Jennifer Hart, Richard Reinen- Issued for Consent 11.04.2018 Hamill, Stephen Priestley Document Acceptance Action Name Signed Date Prepared by Jennifer Hart 11.04.2018 Reviewed by Stephen Priestley 11.04.2018 Approved by Stephen Priestley 11.04.2018 on behalf of Beca Ltd © Beca 2018 (unless Beca has expressly agreed otherwise with the Client in writing). This report has been prepared by Beca on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client’s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Any use or reliance by any person contrary to the above, to which Beca has not given its prior written consent, is at that person's own risk. America's Cup Wynyard Hobson: Coastal Processes and Dredging Technical Report Executive Summary Overview 1. The maritime-based works comprise new wharves (piles and deck), piled breakwaters, wave attenuators, dredging, and underwharf services. Some of these related activities will result in discharges to the Coastal Marine Area (CMA). The proposed works for the America’s Cup are located adjacent to Viaduct Harbour, and the project is referred to as Wynyard Hobson.

  • Engineering Walk Final with out Cover Re-Print.Indd

    Heritage Walks _ The Engineering Heritage of Auckland 5 The Auckland City Refuse Destructor 1905 Early Electricity Generation 1908 9 Wynyard Wharf 1922 3 13 Auckland Electric 1 Hobson Wharf The New Zealand National Maritime Museum Tramways Co. Ltd Princes Wharf 1937 1989 1899–1902 1921–24 12 7 2 The Viaduct 10 4 11 The Auckland Gasworks, Tepid Baths Lift Bridge The Auckland Harbour Bridge The Sky Tower Viaduct Harbour first supply to Auckland 1865 1914 1932 1955-59 1997 1998-99 Route A 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Route B 14 Old 15 Auckland High Court 13 The Old Synagogue 1 10 Albert Park 1942 Government 1865-7 1884-85 The Ferry Building House 1912 1856 16 Parnell Railway Bridge and Viaduct 5 The Dingwall Building 1935 1865-66 3 Chief Post Office 1911 The Britomart Transport Centre 7 The Ligar Canal, named 1852, improved 1860s, covered 1870s 6 8 Civic Theatre 1929 2001-2004 New Zealand 9 Guardian Trust The Auckland Town Hall Building 1911 1914 17 The Auckland Railway Station 1927-37 11 Albert Barracks Wall 2 Queens Wharf 1913 1846-7 4 The Dilworth Building 1926 12 University of Auckland Old Arts Building 1923-26 10 Route A, approx 2.5 hours r St 9 Route B, approx 2.5 hours Hame Brigham St Other features Jellicoe St 1 f r ha W Madden s 2 e St St rf Princ a 12 h 13 W s Beaumont START HERE een 11 Qu Pakenha m St St 1 son ob H St bert y St n St Gaunt St Al 2 e e Pakenh S ue ket Place H1 am Q Hals St 3 ar Customs M St Quay St 3 4 18 NORTH Sw 8 St anson S Fanshawe t 5 7 6 Wyn Shortla dham nd
  • Wynyard Quarter: Urban Design Framework 2007 Was Developed to Provide a Framework for the Development of Wynyard Precinct

    Wynyard Quarter: Urban Design Framework 2007 Was Developed to Provide a Framework for the Development of Wynyard Precinct

    Wynyard Precinct: Urban Design Framework February 2014 Contents 1.0 Introduction – Realising Auckland’s Waterfront Potential 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Background 1.3 Purpose 1.4 Relationship to the Operative District Plan and Proposed Unitary Plan 1.5 Relationship to the Auckland Plan and Waterfront Plan 1.6 Relationship to the Sustainable Development Framework 1.7 Other Waterfront Auckland Guidelines and Rules 2.0 Vision 2.1 Vision for the Auckland waterfront 2.2 Vision for Wynyard Precinct 3.0 Urban Design Concepts 3.1 Concept 1 – The Waterfront Axis 3.2 Concept 2 – The Park Axis 3.3 Concept 3 – The Wharf Axis 3.4 Concept 4 – Waterfront Precincts 4.0 Urban Design Principles 4.1 Principle 1 – Enabling Sustainable Development 4.2 Principle 2 – Facilitating Sustainable Transport and Infrastructure 4.3 Principle 3 – Connecting Waterfront Precincts 4.4 Principle 4 – Providing Waterfront Access 4.5 Principle 5 – Establishing Diverse Public Spaces 4.6 Principle 6 – Promoting an Active and Working Waterfront 4.7 Principle 7 – Creating Appropriate Building Height, Scale, and Form 4.8 Principle 8 – Facilitating a Mix of Uses and Activities 5.0 Indicative Plan fig. 1 Wynyard Precinct aerial view looking south, 2010 5.1 Existing Site 5.2 UDF 2010 Height Plan 5.3 Indicative Height Plan – Permitted Height 6.0 UDF Refresh: Feasibility Study 6.1 Development Controls as per District Plan 6.2 Development as anticipated in the UDF 2007 6.3 Evolution since the District Plan and the UDF 6.4 Example of approach with more flexibility 6.4.1 Amendments to Sites 19/19A/20/20A 6.4.2 Amendments to Sites 19/19A/20/20A – Design Flexibility Study 6.4.3 Amendments to Sites 15/25 6.4.4 Amendments to Sites 27-31A, 34-38A 6.5 Revised Photo Montages 7.0 List of Figures Wynyard Precinct - Urban Design Framework February 2014 Page 3 1.0 Introduction Realising Auckland’s Waterfront Potential 1.1 Introduction Wynyard Precinct, previously known as the ‘Tank Farm’ and ‘Western Reclamation’ is located within the western portion of the wider Auckland City’s waterfront.
  • THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – Kainga Nga Ika Me Nga Wheua Katoa! Auckland – Where the Fish Are So Succulent You Can Eat Them Bones and All!

    THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – Kainga Nga Ika Me Nga Wheua Katoa! Auckland – Where the Fish Are So Succulent You Can Eat Them Bones and All!

    THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – kainga nga ika me nga wheua katoa! Auckland – where the fish are so succulent you can eat them bones and all! This proverb alludes to the once abundant and sought after marine resources of Auckland’s waterfront. It signals Waterfront Auckland’s desire to create a sustainable waterfront providing for the current and future generations of Aucklanders. A place all Aucklanders can access the Waitemata Harbour for recreation, business or cultural practices. FOREWORD The waterfront has reignited Aucklander’s pride in their city. The pride and enthusiasm with which Aucklanders have embraced their new waterfront continues to amaze me. Although in its infancy, stage one of the redeveloped Wynyard Quarter and the expanse of Queens Wharf, attract people day after day, rain and shine. When Waterfront Auckland put forward its draft plans for the redevelopment of the whole waterfront last year we received hundreds of letters, emails and submissions. Most were hugely positive. “Just get on with it!” was the cry. Our job at Waterfront Auckland is to lead the momentum of the revitalisation, and of pride. Having listened to Aucklanders, we have refined our plans and here, we present a vision for how the waterfront could be redeveloped, how it can continue to create transformational change. We are living in an extraordinary time, perhaps unprecedented in recent history where opportunity is constrained and likely to remain so for some time to come. Our approach in these plans is to strike a balance that seizes opportunity while it is offering and continues to strive for a visionary outcome that our city and its people deserve.