DOCSLIB.ORG

America's Cup, Wynyard Hobson Coastal Processes & Dredging

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
America's Cup, Wynyard Hobson Coastal Processes & Dredging Report America’s Cup, Wynyard Hobson Coastal Processes & Dredging Technical Report Resource Consent Application, Wynyard Hobson Prepared for Panuku Development Auckland and Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment Prepared by Beca Ltd and Tonkin & Taylor Ltd April 2018 America's Cup Wynyard Hobson: Coastal Processes and Dredging Technical Report Revision History Revision Nº Prepared By Description Date 1 Jennifer Hart, Richard Reinen- Final Draft Issue for Comment 6.04.2018 Hamill, Stephen Priestley 2 Jennifer Hart, Richard Reinen- Issued for Consent 11.04.2018 Hamill, Stephen Priestley Document Acceptance Action Name Signed Date Prepared by Jennifer Hart 11.04.2018 Reviewed by Stephen Priestley 11.04.2018 Approved by Stephen Priestley 11.04.2018 on behalf of Beca Ltd © Beca 2018 (unless Beca has expressly agreed otherwise with the Client in writing). This report has been prepared by Beca on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client’s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Any use or reliance by any person contrary to the above, to which Beca has not given its prior written consent, is at that person's own risk. America's Cup Wynyard Hobson: Coastal Processes and Dredging Technical Report Executive Summary Overview 1. The maritime-based works comprise new wharves (piles and deck), piled breakwaters, wave attenuators, dredging, and underwharf services. Some of these related activities will result in discharges to the Coastal Marine Area (CMA). The proposed works for the America’s Cup are located adjacent to Viaduct Harbour, and the project is referred to as Wynyard Hobson. This report relates to an application for resource consents for Wynyard Hobson. 2. To facilitate these works, the vehicular ferry will be relocated from the proposal area. A Ferry and Fishing Industry Relocation Facility (FFIRF) is the subject of a separate application for resource consents (and is not addressed further within this report). Assessment Methodology 3. The predicted adverse effects on coastal processes are associated with changes to the basin flushing time, wave reflection outside of the Project Areas, and sedimentation. The predicted beneficial effects are more calm water for mooring a range of vessels. 4. Parallel hydrodynamic models were developed (by Tonkin & Taylor and Beca) and comparison of results/interpretation were deliberated on by the modelling teams. Wave/wake modelling was undertaken by Cardno who have previously conducted wave modelling within the lower Waitematā Harbour. Models were verified by measured data, some of which was collected as part of this project. The interpretation of the potential adverse effects relating to changes in tidal currents, flushing periods, and waves/wakes was a joint assessment by Tonkin & Taylor and Beca. 5. Project objectives for moored boat tranquillity were established from internationally recognised performance criteria and with reference to the host syndicate. Residual wakes are more critical than residual wind waves in the moored areas, with the objective of significant wake heights being less than 0.1m. Existing Environment 6. The affected coastal marina areas (CMA) (referred to as the Project Area) are in the lower Waitematā Harbour. 7. The Project Area is adjacent to the main tidal channel. Tidal velocities are less than 0.2 m/s and sedimentation rates are typically around 35mm/year averaged over the whole Viaduct Harbour. Water quality in terms of total suspended solids is generally good. 8. The natural, relatively high tidal range of 2.5m (median) results in good to fair flushing of Viaduct Harbour. 9. The Project Area is subject to diffracted wind waves from West and East and direct wind waves to the North. Vessel wakes are a regular feature and problematic for some moored vessels within Outer Viaduct Harbour and Westhaven Marina (due to vessel excitation). 10. Relevant coastal hazards include sea level rise, storm surge (extreme storm tides) and associated wave overtopping, and tsunami. America's Cup Wynyard Hobson: Coastal Processes and Dredging Technical Report Proposed Works 11. The approximate areas and dredging volumes for the Wynyard Hobson facilities as shown in Civil Drawings 1 to 11 are given below. No reclamation is proposed. 2,000m2 of temporary wharf structure and 9,000m2 of permanent wharf structure including wave panels. 3,200m2 of permanent piled, decked breakwater including wave panels. 600m2 of pile footprint at the seabed. 5,000m2 of floating pontoons. 78,000m3 of dredging. Potentially 9,000m3of borehole corings temporarily deposited on the seabed for later dredging. Potential Environmental Effects 12. The proposed layout will change tidal currents, basin flushing times, wave/wake reflection and sedimentation. 13. The effects of the proposed development on tidal flows and currents are considered to be no more than minor because of the localised extent and limited actual scale of these changes. 14. Basin flushing times are longer but predominately tend to stay in similar good / fair categories as the existing flushing. The exception is the Inner Viaduct Harbour where it changes from good to fair. All the increases are predicted, however, to remain within the “fair” or “good” flushing band. Changes in the flushing times represent a moderate/minor adverse change compared with the beneficial change of berth tranquillity for the Outer Viaduct Harbour and Wynyard Wharf South water space. Flushing is only one of the inputs to the assessment of effects on water quality that is addressed in Assessment of Coastal Environmental Effects Associated with the Development of America's Cup Facilities for the Wynyard Hobson Option (Golder, 2018). The Golder report includes the description of existing water quality, incorporating the results of recent sampling, a discussion of water quality considerations and potential consequences, and conclusions regarding the effects of the proposed development on water quality. The Golder report conclusions, which consider water quality in relation to the discharge of stormwater, algal growth and overall ecology are summarised below: Stormwater discharge and TSS: TSS concentrations from the Halsey Street stormwater outfall should not result in prolonged water clarity changes within the Inner Viaduct Harbour, however a very large rain storm event is likely to result in some clarity changes over a period of 24 hours or more. At the Freemans Bay stormwater outfall beneath North Wharf the stormwater is untreated and known to have poor clarity at times. Currently, following a period of mixing, it is likely that some clarity changes will persist off North Wharf and alongside Wynyard Wharf. Post-development, based on increased flushing times, clarity changes will be expected in this area for a period of at least 24 hours. Stormwater discharge and microbiological water quality: Overall, no significant changes in microbiological water quality are expected within the Inner Viaduct Harbour from discharges from the Halsey Street stormwater outfall. Discharge from the Freemans Bay stormwater outfall beneath North Wharf currently results in poor microbiological water quality in the area of North Wharf and north along Wynyard Wharf after rain events. Post construction, water quality in the Karanga Plaza steps area should be considered to be poor quality for 24-48 hours following a rain storm discharge from the Freemans Bay stormwater outfall. There is on-going work by Auckland Council and Watercare to address Freemans Bay stormwater outfall quality. Algal growth: Increase in biomass is not anticipated to be observable to the casual observer. America's Cup Wynyard Hobson: Coastal Processes and Dredging Technical Report Overall ecology: Reduction in water movement can have the potential to influence the composition of biological communities on basin walls, piles and floating pontoons. An Inner Viaduct Harbour Environmental Management Plan should be prepared and implemented, covering water quality monitoring and management in the Inner Viaduct Harbour. Recommendations on the plan are set out in the Golder report. 15. There will be a similar or slightly less degree of reflection outside the Project Area, in Freemans Bay and the Maritime Museum basin but the increase in maximum wave height is typically less than 0.1m for the recommended option. Any potential adverse effects relating to this small increase are expected to be difficult to detect as the sea state is relatively energetic under present conditions. 16. Sedimentation will increase in the more tranquil basins/harbours, at a similar scale to existing sedimentation rates. Potential adverse effects are therefore expected to be minor and to be managed using existing maintenance dredging practices in a similar manner to present sedimentation. 17. Dredging will create sediment plumes which become more diffuse away from the dredger. Assessment undertaken for this report and previous dredging campaigns have both shown effects from dredging plumes to be less than minor with localised and temporary increases in suspended sediment estimated to be less than 1% of the total sediment flux per tide. The depth of material deposited at any single location from the plume is expected to be undetectable. 18. Coastal hazards and climate change have been considered for the Wynyard Point structures and measures identified to address them. Overall Conclusions 19. For Wynyard Hobson, the main beneficial effect is increased calm water-space
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Document
    RESOURCE CONSENTSUPPORTAGREEl\lIENT EXECUTIONAND D ATE Executed as an agreement. Date: 5 June 2019 SIGNED by America's Cup Event Limited by: Director Director V\J/t f; '-1;'\.-f Mfi1,\/_$ Print Name Print Name SIGNEDby Panuku Development Auckland Limited by: Director Print Name Print Name 4 4441220_3 CONDITION STAGE WHO GENERAL Definition of terms 3 The consent holder shall appoint a suitably experienced person with appropriate seniority for a period of 10-years from All Panuku commencement of the consent to: (a) Take responsibility for the implementation of the consent conditions; (b) Maintain oversight of the overall programme; (c) Ensure liaison and consultation between stakeholders to the conditions of consent including but not limited to Auckland Council, Council-Controlled Organisations, the Community Liaison Group, the Forum (Condition 5), and the Auckland Civil Defence and Emergency Management Group; (d) Manage the lodgement or submission of documents or reports to the Team Leader Compliance Monitoring – Central where required by the conditions; (d) Carry out appropriate reporting to assist the Council with compliance monitoring; and (e) Take such actions as necessary to resolve any matters arising from the implementation of the conditions. Mana Whenua Engagement 5 Prior to the Commencement of Consent, the consent holder shall invite the mana whenua listed below in c) to establish a Forum to: Pre- Consent a) Assist the consent holder in the preparation of an America’s Cup Kaitiaki Engagement Plan (ACKEP) (Conditions 5A-5F) construction holder consistent with relevant customary practices and in accordance with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti o Waitangi), especially the principles of consultation, active participation and partnership; and b) Fulfil the obligations set out in the America’s Cup Kaitiaki Engagement Plan on behalf of mana whenua.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Headspace Meets Workspace
    INTRODUCTION 01 PAGE Where headspace meets workspace V Precinct is defined by connection. Where energy meets action, energy is defined by connection. Where V Precinct X V where workspace meets headspace. An intersection of things more workspace meets headspace. An intersection of things more where than the sum of their parts, that we call connected energy. INTRODUCTION PAGE 02 INTRODUCTION PAGE 03 INTRODUCTION 04 PAGE Where Where Where Where energy meets headspace meets business meets design meets action workspace business functionality Aerial of VXV Precinct, where Victoria Park meets the Viaduct meets Park Victoria where Precinct, of VXV Aerial INTRODUCTION PAGE 05 Modern and contemporary spaces INTRODUCTION 06 PAGE VXV Precinct is a new space for a new business energy. It’s a commercial hub that’s perfect for the new breed of progressive businesses – more connected and more dynamic. Here, different categories co-exist, united by a shared passion and energy to take New Zealand forward. VXV Precinct between Victoria Park and the Viaduct INTRODUCTION 07 PAGE Perfectly Placed VXV is at the forefront of the new and The location is moments from key transport Perfectly placed between exciting commercial culture being built routes and amenities, with cafes and spaces Victoria Park and the Viaduct, around the Viaduct Harbour and Wynyard for the mobile workforce, with a low- Quarter areas. VXV itself is a natural home rise campus feel it’s perfectly positioned VXV is home to some of for significant, progressive and dynamic between park and waterfront. New Zealand’s most progressive businesses. businesses. ry er F ar C ke he ai W MAP KEY: VXV Precinct Wynyard Point e Surrounding Developments 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 32 Plan Change 3 Wynyard Quarter
    Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal Proposed Plan Change 3 Wynyard Quarter SECTION 32 REPORT July 2007 Auckland Regional Council Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 2 Auckland Regional Council TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose and Scope of the Section 32 Report 2 STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 2.1 Part II of the RMA 2.2 Purpose of Regional Coastal Plans 2.3 New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement and Auckland Regional Policy Statement 2.4 Section 32 Requirements 2.5 Initial Evaluation of Management Alternatives 3 ASSESSMENT OF PLAN CHANGE 3 – WYNYARD QUARTER 3.1 Purpose of Plan Change 3.2 Summary of Key Changes 3.3 Background Work – Auckland Waterfront Vision 2040 and Consultation Summary 3.4 Do the Objectives Achieve the Purpose of the RMA? 3.5 Evaluation of Policies and Methods – Efficiency and Effectiveness 3.6 Evaluation of Policies and Methods – Costs, Benefits and Risks 4 CONCLUSION Abbreviations used in this report: ACC – Auckland City Council ARC – Auckland Regional Council CMA – Coastal Marine Area HGMPA – Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000 HSEW – Halsey Street Extension Wharf NZCPS – New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 1994 PMA – Port Management Area POAL – Ports of Auckland Ltd RMA – Resource Management Act 1991 RPC – Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal 2004 RPS – Auckland Regional Policy Statement 1999 Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 3 Auckland Regional Council Section 32 Report for Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal, Proposed Plan Change 3, Wynyard Quarter – July 2007 4 Auckland Regional Council 1 INTRODUCTION The Auckland Regional Council (ARC) has prepared a proposed plan change to the Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal 2004 (RPC).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Anzics New Zealand Regional Asm 4 – 6 April 2018
    ! 2018 ANZICS NEW ZEALAND REGIONAL ASM 4 – 6 APRIL 2018 . THE HILTON HOTEL, AUCKLAND, NZ . WWW.ANZICS2018.NZ HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Convenor's Welcome 4 Thanks To Our Sponsor 5 Auckland Map 6 Our World Class Venue 7 General Information 10 Keynote Speakers 11 Invited Speakers 19 Abstract Awards 19 AGM Information 20 Social Programme 21 Programme Overview 27 Speaker Abstracts 43 Poster Abstract 44 Exhibitor Listing & Floorplan 45 Sponsor & Exhibitor Profiles ORGANISING COMMITTEE Dr Anusha Ganeshalingham Convenor ANZICS 2018 ASM Paediatric Intensivist, Starship Child Health Anusha is a paediatric intensivist at Starship Child Health. Anusha undertook paediatric training both in New Zealand and London where she gained her MRCPCH from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (UK). Upon returning to New Zealand, Anusha completed advanced training with the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in 2013. Anusha first trained in paediatric intensive care medicine at Starship Child Health and returned to London to undertake an 18-month fellowship at the Evelina Children’s Hospital. She became a fellow of the College of Intensive Care Medicine in 2013. In July, Anusha returned from The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, where she undertook a one year Neurocritical Care Fellowship. Key research interests include brain injury with a specific focus on neuromonitoring during extracorporeal membranous oxygenation. Non-clinical interests include hiking and yoga. Dr David Buckley Dr Alex Kazemi Paediatric Intensivist, ICU Specialist, Starship Child Health Middlemore Hospital Nicola Gini Claire Sherring Nurse Unit Manager, Research Co-Ordinator, Starship Child Health Starship Child Health 2 www.anzics2018.nz CONVENOR'S WELCOME It is with great pleasure that I welcome you to the City of Sails for the New Zealand Regional ANZICS Annual Scientific Meeting held on 4-6 April 2018 at the Hilton Hotel in Auckland’s Viaduct Harbour.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexure02 Viaduct Harbour Urban Design Guidelines
    ANNEXURE 2 VIADUCT HARBOUR URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES ANNEX 2 CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN Page 2 CENTRAL AREA SECTION - OPERATIVE 2004 ANNEX 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................5 BACKGROUND ............................................................................6 HISTORY OF THE AREA..............................................................7 CONTEXT......................................................................................9 OBJECTIVES OF THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES ............12 PUBLIC SPACE .......................................................................................14 PUBLIC SPACE NETWORK.......................................................14 PERMEABILITY ..........................................................................17 URBAN FORM ............................................................................18 MORPHOLOGY...........................................................................20 SQUARES ...................................................................................22 WATERFRONT PROMENADES.................................................27 STREETS.....................................................................................29 LANES.........................................................................................32 VIEW SHAFTS.............................................................................35 CITY BLOCKS..........................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Walk Final with out Cover Re-Print.Indd
    Heritage Walks _ The Engineering Heritage of Auckland 5 The Auckland City Refuse Destructor 1905 Early Electricity Generation 1908 9 Wynyard Wharf 1922 3 13 Auckland Electric 1 Hobson Wharf The New Zealand National Maritime Museum Tramways Co. Ltd Princes Wharf 1937 1989 1899–1902 1921–24 12 7 2 The Viaduct 10 4 11 The Auckland Gasworks, Tepid Baths Lift Bridge The Auckland Harbour Bridge The Sky Tower Viaduct Harbour first supply to Auckland 1865 1914 1932 1955-59 1997 1998-99 Route A 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Route B 14 Old 15 Auckland High Court 13 The Old Synagogue 1 10 Albert Park 1942 Government 1865-7 1884-85 The Ferry Building House 1912 1856 16 Parnell Railway Bridge and Viaduct 5 The Dingwall Building 1935 1865-66 3 Chief Post Office 1911 The Britomart Transport Centre 7 The Ligar Canal, named 1852, improved 1860s, covered 1870s 6 8 Civic Theatre 1929 2001-2004 New Zealand 9 Guardian Trust The Auckland Town Hall Building 1911 1914 17 The Auckland Railway Station 1927-37 11 Albert Barracks Wall 2 Queens Wharf 1913 1846-7 4 The Dilworth Building 1926 12 University of Auckland Old Arts Building 1923-26 10 Route A, approx 2.5 hours r St 9 Route B, approx 2.5 hours Hame Brigham St Other features Jellicoe St 1 f r ha W Madden s 2 e St St rf Princ a 12 h 13 W s Beaumont START HERE een 11 Qu Pakenha m St St 1 son ob H St bert y St n St Gaunt St Al 2 e e Pakenh S ue ket Place H1 am Q Hals St 3 ar Customs M St Quay St 3 4 18 NORTH Sw 8 St anson S Fanshawe t 5 7 6 Wyn Shortla dham nd
    [Show full text]
  • Wynyard Quarter: Urban Design Framework 2007 Was Developed to Provide a Framework for the Development of Wynyard Precinct
    Wynyard Precinct: Urban Design Framework February 2014 Contents 1.0 Introduction – Realising Auckland’s Waterfront Potential 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Background 1.3 Purpose 1.4 Relationship to the Operative District Plan and Proposed Unitary Plan 1.5 Relationship to the Auckland Plan and Waterfront Plan 1.6 Relationship to the Sustainable Development Framework 1.7 Other Waterfront Auckland Guidelines and Rules 2.0 Vision 2.1 Vision for the Auckland waterfront 2.2 Vision for Wynyard Precinct 3.0 Urban Design Concepts 3.1 Concept 1 – The Waterfront Axis 3.2 Concept 2 – The Park Axis 3.3 Concept 3 – The Wharf Axis 3.4 Concept 4 – Waterfront Precincts 4.0 Urban Design Principles 4.1 Principle 1 – Enabling Sustainable Development 4.2 Principle 2 – Facilitating Sustainable Transport and Infrastructure 4.3 Principle 3 – Connecting Waterfront Precincts 4.4 Principle 4 – Providing Waterfront Access 4.5 Principle 5 – Establishing Diverse Public Spaces 4.6 Principle 6 – Promoting an Active and Working Waterfront 4.7 Principle 7 – Creating Appropriate Building Height, Scale, and Form 4.8 Principle 8 – Facilitating a Mix of Uses and Activities 5.0 Indicative Plan fig. 1 Wynyard Precinct aerial view looking south, 2010 5.1 Existing Site 5.2 UDF 2010 Height Plan 5.3 Indicative Height Plan – Permitted Height 6.0 UDF Refresh: Feasibility Study 6.1 Development Controls as per District Plan 6.2 Development as anticipated in the UDF 2007 6.3 Evolution since the District Plan and the UDF 6.4 Example of approach with more flexibility 6.4.1 Amendments to Sites 19/19A/20/20A 6.4.2 Amendments to Sites 19/19A/20/20A – Design Flexibility Study 6.4.3 Amendments to Sites 15/25 6.4.4 Amendments to Sites 27-31A, 34-38A 6.5 Revised Photo Montages 7.0 List of Figures Wynyard Precinct - Urban Design Framework February 2014 Page 3 1.0 Introduction Realising Auckland’s Waterfront Potential 1.1 Introduction Wynyard Precinct, previously known as the ‘Tank Farm’ and ‘Western Reclamation’ is located within the western portion of the wider Auckland City’s waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – Kainga Nga Ika Me Nga Wheua Katoa! Auckland – Where the Fish Are So Succulent You Can Eat Them Bones and All!
    THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – kainga nga ika me nga wheua katoa! Auckland – where the fish are so succulent you can eat them bones and all! This proverb alludes to the once abundant and sought after marine resources of Auckland’s waterfront. It signals Waterfront Auckland’s desire to create a sustainable waterfront providing for the current and future generations of Aucklanders. A place all Aucklanders can access the Waitemata Harbour for recreation, business or cultural practices. FOREWORD The waterfront has reignited Aucklander’s pride in their city. The pride and enthusiasm with which Aucklanders have embraced their new waterfront continues to amaze me. Although in its infancy, stage one of the redeveloped Wynyard Quarter and the expanse of Queens Wharf, attract people day after day, rain and shine. When Waterfront Auckland put forward its draft plans for the redevelopment of the whole waterfront last year we received hundreds of letters, emails and submissions. Most were hugely positive. “Just get on with it!” was the cry. Our job at Waterfront Auckland is to lead the momentum of the revitalisation, and of pride. Having listened to Aucklanders, we have refined our plans and here, we present a vision for how the waterfront could be redeveloped, how it can continue to create transformational change. We are living in an extraordinary time, perhaps unprecedented in recent history where opportunity is constrained and likely to remain so for some time to come. Our approach in these plans is to strike a balance that seizes opportunity while it is offering and continues to strive for a visionary outcome that our city and its people deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Auckland
    H l t a rd S e R n N P fo v n N s A e e l r u l u o a ve o o rtsea t e e ve ra g Av or e v e n o e n P P B A na r l S d ter w e an r C a at a o d t a C l w K m C d ysw n ra h m G d S fford Bay A R o d S a R B r t r o t R t d t n e u en e e A l l inc S z l i S s B o l e V s e l u ce Bayswater v u n u c C e t e n M ra Ne v e n r e r W ls A r W d i P r la son A a e a a H e r Ave na b ll u H T e a l P l n o a P a a l n i e ce am a R g n m r s e m s i ti R A i A r a e it S r e r d e o d n a o u m r M a M a i d C R o a R W a MAP KEY d a g ur R arin akak at d S a St S Ng u u l l p p ve PostPost Office OfficeMAPPost KEY Office h h t A u o N u o Pl N c e i s e r ston a r A en g av B Post Office a a R Ti a ToiletsToiletsPost OfficeToilets z h z h a r a a e t a t rd t S Post Office d rt P a r P t a ath l o a R l R o B S c h N h N d d N a N i-SITEi-SitesToiletsi-Sites Visitori-Sites Information Centre 1 A d B Cnemoa D E F G H I e J Toilets in R Toilets a R Hi R v ng P A n d tau d C a K L e r n a w O i a Visitori-SitesMain InformationbusMain depots bus depots n ce r R Maini-Sites bus depots erra m r R i-SITES c Te A i-Sites o T D a rih b e A t e r a s i W E a W E a r R InterMainFerry City bus BusFerry depots Depots b Main bus depots b S Ferry S Main bus depots R d e ve y d Main Bus depots t t e A d c y A d d Cheltenham Beach ra b S rr Lake n e Lake lle R Explore T T A t FerryFerry Train line A l O TrainFerry line S d l Ferry S a u a uc RdJim Tit or x Ferry k ss i c fo d a f l ces h s i o a Acc e t e R n n Bay A o v R h r d ringa B n o t d atari e
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland's Waterfront: Legacy Benefits of America's Cup Summary
    Auckland’s waterfront: legacy benefits of America’s Cup Summary Hosting the 36th America’s Cup is Auckland’s next chance to continue the downtown waterfront’s transformation, and to leave a long-term legacy for Aucklanders and visitors. The next America’s Cup events are an exciting opportunity for Auckland to show off our beautiful harbour and incredible sailing technology. Once the events are over, Auckland will also enjoy some significant legacy benefits: Upgraded public spaces and access to the waterfront from Hobson and Halsey wharves Permanent land and sheltered water space for existing and future water-based events Potential long-term base for Emirates Team NZ (ETNZ), and flexible water-side building for community and maritime uses Long term infrastructure for marine uses – fit-out and haul-out facilities ( Wynyard Point marine precinct) Additional berths for recreational and tourism uses, and as attractors to the waterfront Introduce public uses to Wynyard Point, currently an industrial area, but an place that will change over time to a major destination park and mixed use development Relocation of Sealink and other maritime uses, freeing up Viaduct and Wynyard Basins for other uses This next phase of waterfront regeneration builds on decades of planning that envisaged a working waterfront that linked the city to the sea, and reflected our marine heritage and culture. In the next five years, the last of the tanks will depart from Wynyard Point, completing the vision of generous public spaces where people can experience the harbour up close and personal – without needing a boat. The city’s valuable marine industry will continue to thrive, supporting the goals of a sustainable, accessible working waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • 47Bun60340404appendix 16 Transport Assessment.Pdf
    PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WYNYARD CROSSING WYNYARD QUARTER TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Prepared By: Todd Langwell June 2019 Reference: 19148 Issue C – Final Auckland Office: P O Box 60-255, Titirangi, Auckland 0642 Level 1, 400 Titirangi Road, Titirangi Village Tel: (09) 817 2500 Fax: (09) 817 2504 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Project Information: Client Panuku Development Auckland Job Number 19148 Title Proposed Bridge Replacement - Wynyard Crossing, Wynyard Quarter - Transport Assessment Prepared By Todd Langwell Date June 2019 Document History and SSStatusStatus Revision Date Issued Reviewed By Approved by Date approved Status A 26/05/2019 Todd Langwell 31/05/2019 Draft B 12/06/2019 Todd Langwell 13/06/2019 Updated Draft C 13/06/2019 Todd Langwell 14/06/2019 Final This document and information contained herein is the intellectual property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd and is solely for the use of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd contracted client. This document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied, without the written consent of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd accepts no responsibility to any third party who may use or rely upon this document. Proposed Bridge Replacement Wynyard Crossing, Wynyard Quarter Transport Assessment Issue C – Final Ref: 19148 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND & CONTEXT .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Access Map for Auckland's
    Access Map for Auckland’s CBD 1758000 HEREFORD ST Karangahape Road Legend KARANGAHAPE RD HOWE ST ABBEY ST GUNDRY ST MAHON WAY HOPETOUN ST HOBSON Pier 1 Pier 2 Wheelchair Accessible Toilets WHARF QUEENS PRINCESS WHARF CAPTAIN WHARF COOK Viaduct Events Centre WHARF BERESFORD ST CENTRAL MARSDEN WHARF HOWE ST Mobility On-Street Parking Voyager National ST TINLEY Maritime Museum (131) Downtown Ferry Terminal EDINBURGH ST Wynyard Crossing QUAY ST B OPHIR ST SOUTHERN MWY R Auckland Council Parking Buildings I T O M Vector Arena NORTH-WESTERN MWY TYLER ST A R T this way Viaduct Harbour P COBDEN ST NZ Post Shops Britomart Transport Centre L SOUTHERN MWY GALWAY ST Taxi Stands BEACH RD ST TANGIHUA (22) (54) ROUKAI LN ROUKAI T EAST DAY ST CUSTOMS ST WEST CUSTOMS S WEST TCE NORTH-WESTERN MWY (17) COMMERCE ST ANZAC AV Taxi Stands (night time only) (8) GORE STREET LA FORT LA BOARDMAN LA (45) GALATOS ST GORE ST GORE Wheelchair Accessible ATMs* LOWER HOBSONLOWER ST WOLFE ST QUEEN ST QUEEN FORT ST Emily MARKET LA MARKET EMILY PL STURDEE ST EXCHANGE Place LANE BERESFORD SQ Wheelchair Accessible Public Phones* SOUTH ST SHORT ST MARKET PL MARKET ST MILLS LA PAKENHAM ST EAST TLAND E FEDERAL ST SHOR D E ST N C SWANSON ST SHORTLAND R EAST ST O'CONNELL ST FIELDS LA i-SITE Visitor Information Centres CRUISE LA LA CY BRADNOR LA UR AVE LU 2 O NORTH-WESTERN MWY B HOBSON ST NORTH-WESTERN MWY R ST PATRICKS SQ BANKSIDE ST A VULCAN LA CHANCERY ST PITT ST Citizens Advice Bureau H BACON'S LA ALBERT ST 1758000 (2) T (1) C WATERLOO QUAD DU A FREYBURG PLC CANADA ST VI WYNDHAM ST IAN MCKINNON DR HIGH ST Ferry Building QUEEN ST QUEEN MERCURY LA SOUTHERN MWY KARANGAHAPE RD KARANGAHAPE GORST LA CROSS ST Myers Park Britomart Transport Centre FANSHAWE ST NELSON ST KINGSTON ST DURHAM ST WEST BOWEN AV VOGEL LA SERVICE LA TCE POYNTON Pedestrian Streets GRAHAM ST BOWEN LA HARDINGE ST (51-63) 4 Ponsonby Road The University VICTORIA ST WEST of Auckland (100) Stairs (9) (27) (112) UPPER QUEEN ST CASCADE ST Sky Tower JERVOIS RD HALSEY ST DOCK ST GradientCOLLEGESCOTIA PL HILL >1:12 (i.e.
    [Show full text]