DOCSLIB.ORG

Lillybank Farm, Battle Transport Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lillybank Farm, Battle Transport Statement LILLYBANK FARM, BATTLE TRANSPORT STATEMENT FEBRUARY 2016 LILLYBANK FARM, BATTLE TRANSPORT STATEMENT Millwood Designer Homes Ltd Project no: 70011043 Date: February 2016 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff WSP UK Limited Mountbatten House Basing View Basingstoke RG21 4HJ Tel: +44 (0)12 5631 8658 Fax: +44 (0)12 5631 8700 www.wspgroup.com www.pbworld.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 Remarks Draft Issue Date February 2016 February 2016 Prepared by Luke Bacon Graham Sutton Signature Checked by Graham Sutton Colin McKay Signature Authorised by Colin McKay Colin McKay Signature Project number 70011043 70011043 Report number File reference ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................1 2 POLICY CONTEXT .......................................................................2 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ..............................................................4 4 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS .................................................11 5 TRANSPORT USE AND IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS..............................................................................14 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................17 Lillybank Farm, Battle WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Millwood Designer Homes Ltd Project No 70011043 February 2016 iii TABLES TABLE 3-1: BUS SERVICES FROM LONDON ROAD........................................................ 8 TABLE 3-2: KEY DESTINATIONS FROM BATTLE RAILWAY STATION ............................ 9 TABLE 3-3: ACCESSIBILITY TO LOCAL FACILITIES ...................................................... 10 TABLE 4-1: PROPOSED ACCOMMODATION SCHEDULE ............................................. 11 TABLE 4-2: PROPOSED CAR PARKING PROVISION .................................................... 12 TABLE 4-3: ESCC CYCLE PARKING STANDARDS ........................................................ 13 TABLE 5-1: VEHICULAR TRIP RATES (PER DWELLING) .............................................. 14 TABLE 5-2: VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION (50 DWELLINGS) .................................... 14 TABLE 5-3: PREDICTED PEAK HOUR TRIPS BY ALL MODES BASED ON EXISTING MODE SHARE ................................................................................ 15 TABLE 5-4: PREDICTED PEAK HOUR TRIPS BY ALL MODES BASED ON EXISTING MODE SHARE ................................................................................ 15 FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION AND LOCAL HIGHWAY NETWORK FIGURE 2 PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY FIGURE 3 LOCAL BUS NETWORK FIGURE 4 LOCAL FACILITIES DRAWINGS DRAWING NO: 11043-SK-001 REV C DRAWING NO: 11043-ATR-001 REV A APPENDICES APPENDIX A PRE-APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE APPENDIX B TRAFFIC SURVEY DATA APPENDIX C PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT DATA APPENDIX D ILLUSTRATIVE MASTERPLAN APPENDIX E TRICS OUTPUTS Lillybank Farm, Battle WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Millwood Designer Homes Ltd Project No 70011043 February 2016 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.1.1 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff has been commissioned by Millwood Designer Homes Ltd to prepare a Transport Statement (TS) in support of the planning application for 50 dwellings at Lillybank Farm, Battle. The site is currently used for agricultural and equestrian purposes. The site location and local highway network are shown on Figure 1. 1.1.2 Pre-application advice was sought from East Sussex County Council (ESCC), the local Highway Authority, in July / August 2015. ESCC recommended that a TS be produced for a development of this size. The structure of this TS follows the ESCC document “Transport Assessments, Transport Statement and Transport Reports: Guidance for Development Proposals in East Sussex” that was referred to as part of this advice. The pre-application correspondence is included as Appendix A. 1.2 REPORT STRUCTURE 1.2.1 This TS is presented under the following sections: Æ Section 2 reviews the current transport and planning policy framework relevant to the TS; Æ Section 3 reviews the accessibility of the site and the surrounding highway network; Æ Section 4 details the development proposals, including refuse and servicing arrangements; Æ Section 5 outlines the anticipated trip generation of the site and the likely transport impacts of the development proposals; and Æ Section 6 provides a summary and conclusion to the TS. Lillybank Farm, Battle WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Millwood Designer Homes Ltd Project No 70011043 February 2016 2 2 POLICY CONTEXT Introduction 2.1.1 The following section reviews pertinent national and local planning policy in line with ESCC Guidance for Transport Reports. National Planning Policy Framework, March 2012 2.1.2 Paragraph 14 of the policy states that: “At the heart of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is a presumption in favour of sustainable development, which should be seen as a golden thread running through both plan-making and decision-taking.” 2.1.3 This policy directs that locations which are sustainable or which can be made sustainable should be made the focus for significant development. Paragraph 32 states that there should be demonstration of: Æ “The opportunities for sustainable transport modes to be used, reducing the need for major transport infrastructure; Æ Provision of safe and suitable access to the site for all people; and Æ Improvements which can be undertaken within the transport network to limit the significant impacts of the development.” 2.1.4 Development should only be prevented or refused on transport grounds where the residual cumulative impacts of development are severe. 2.1.5 A review of the local transport infrastructure described in Section 3 of this TS has shown that there is a range of sustainable transport options available for residents of the proposed dwellings. The access points into the proposed development will be designed to the relevant standards to ensure safe and suitable access for all users. Later in this TS, the traffic impact of the development is considered in more detail and found unlikely to result in any significant impacts, and certainly none that are severe. Rother Local Plan Core Strategy, September 2014 2.1.6 The term Local Development Framework has now been replaced with Local Plan. The Rother Local Plan Core Strategy was adopted on the 29th September 2014. The objective of the plan is to “contribute towards the achievement of sustainable development” 2.1.7 In relation to Battle there are several key strategies within Policy BA1: Policy Framework for Battle that are relevant to the proposed development these include: Æ “Provide for 475-500 net additional dwellings in Battle over the Plan period 2011-2028, by developing new housing via opportunities both within the development boundary, and modest peripheral expansion opportunities that respects the setting of Battle within the High Weald AONB and supports community facilities. Æ Ensure that new development does not put pressure on local infrastructure, and that it makes appropriate contribution to community and other infrastructure. Lillybank Farm, Battle WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Millwood Designer Homes Ltd Project No 70011043 February 2016 3 2.1.8 When taking current allocations into account there “remain a need to find land for 145-170 dwellings up to 2028” and is “likely to require extension to the current development boundary.” 2.1.9 Whilst the proposed development is on the edge of the proposed boundary, it is a “peripheral expansion opportunity” and will support community facilities due to the convenient location and accessibility to sustainable transport modes. ESCC Local Transport Plan (LTP3) 2011-2026 2.1.10 The Local Area Transport Strategy is now known as ESCC Local Transport Plan 3. This policy document sets out the council’s vision for a fifteen year period up to 2026 to “make East Sussex a prosperous county where an effective, well managed transport infrastructure and improved travel choices help businesses to thrive and deliver better access to jobs and services, safer, healthier, sustainable and inclusive communities and a high quality environment.” 2.1.11 ESCC have developed key priorities in its approach to support Battle and these are summarised below: Æ working with Rother District Council (RDC) to identify improvements to transport infrastructure improvements Æ focus on improvements to safe, coherent walking and cycling routes on key/routes corridors; Æ focus on improvements to public transport; Æ focus on reducing congestion in town centres; and Æ working with partners to improve access to key services. Guidance for Parking at New Residential Development 2.1.12 The car and cycle parking at the proposed development will be compliant with the ESCC Guidance for Parking at New Residential Development Supplementary Planning Guidance. The East Sussex Residential Car Parking Demand Calculator will be used in order to determine appropriate car parking provision. 2.2 OTHER DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 2.2.1 Following a review of planning decisions, there are no other nearby consented developments that are likely to have any impact on the highways in the vicinity of the proposed development. Lillybank Farm, Battle WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Millwood Designer Homes Ltd Project No 70011043 February 2016 4 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1.1 The proposed development is bounded by the A2100 London Road to the east, Netherfield Hill to the south and west and agricultural land to the north. The site is currently used for agricultural and equestrian purposes. The location of the site and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Battle Civil Parish
    Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2019-2028 PLAN PROPOSAL SUBMISSION Published by Battle Town Council for the Regulation 15 Plan Proposal Submission under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 and in accordance with EU Directive 2001/42 NOVEMBER 2020 Table of Contents FOREWORD 4 SECTION 1: Introduction and Background 5 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Neighbourhood Area 1.3 The Planning Policy Context SECTION 2: Process Summary 9 2.1 The Plan Process 2.2 Community Engagement 2.3 Evidence Base Overview SECTION 3: The Parish background 11 3.1 Spatial Characteristics of the Parish 3.2 Economy 3.3 Population and households 3.4 Households 3.5 Transport 3.6 Conservation Area 3.7 Development from an Historic Perspective – The Town of Battle 3.8 Facilities and Services 3.9 Constraints 3.10 SWOT Analysis of Battle SECTION 4: Vision and Objectives 35 4.1 Vision 4.2 Objectives SECTION 5: Neighbourhood Plan Policies 38 5.1 Housing and Development 5.2 Infrastructure 5.3 Environment 5.4 Economy and Tourism SECTION 6: Implementation, Monitoring and Review 60 SECTION 7: Community Aspirations 61 For purposes of this Plan the use of appendix, annexe and schedule are used as follows: An appendix is included at the end of the plan because it is too large for the body of the plan but needs to be referenced for clarity. The aim of the appendices is to add greater details, visuals and aid for better understanding. An annexe is a standalone document/report which can be read in its own right but supports the main document.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Specifications 2016 South East South East Route March 2016 Network Rail –Route Specifications: South East 02
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Route Specifications 2016 South East South East Route March 2016 Network Rail –Route Specifications: South East 02 Route A: Kent and High Speed One (HS1) Route B: Sussex In 2014, Network Rail merged the Kent and Sussex SRS A.01 Victoria Lines 4 SRS B.01 London Victoria - Windmill Bridge Junction 65 Route into South East Route. Kent and Sussex becoming Areas within the Route. SRS A.02 Otford - Sevenoaks 8 SRS B.02 Windmill Bridge Junction - Brighton 69 SRS A.03 London - Chislehurst 12 SRS B.03 London Bridge - Windmill Bridge Junction 73 To reflect this change, this document consists of Kent SRS A.04 Chislehurst - Tonbridge 16 SRS B.04 Three Bridges - Arundel Junction 77 and Sussex Areas in separate sections. SRS A.05 Chislehurst - Ashford 20 SRS B.05 Brighton - Havant 81 SRS A.06 Tonbridge - Hastings 24 SRS B.06 Brighton/Wivelsfield - Seaford/Hastings 85 The South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study Draft SRS A.07 Dartford lines to Gravesend & Hayes Branch 28 SRS B.07 South Central Inner Suburban 89 for Consultation was published in 2014 so this document will be updated in Summer 2015 when the SRS A.08 Bromley North Branch 32 SRS B.08 South Central Sutton Lines 93 Final document has been published. SRS A.09 Gravesend/Swanley - Margate 36 SRS B.09 Dorking - Horsham 97 SRS A.10 Sheerness Branch 40 SRS B.10 Hurst Green - Uckfield 101 SRS A.11 Strood - Paddock Wood 44 SRS B.11 Tattenham Corner and Caterham Lines 105 SRS A.12 East Kent Routes 48 SRS B.12 East Grinstead Line 109 SRS A.13 Hastings
    [Show full text]
  • Bluebell Railway Education Department
    BLUEBELL RAILWAY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT 4a. The development of the railway coach 1. The earliest form of railway coach resembled the stagecoach as can be seen from the coach “Experiment” which operated on the Stockton and Darlington Railway in 1825, the UK's first public railway. 2. Some ten years later, following the opening of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway in 1830 the stagecoach resemblance can still be seen in this replica of a 1st class coach from 1834. At that time first and second class were enclosed, with first class having upholstered seats. Third class passengers (who travelled outside on a stage-coach) were only provided with benches in open wagons. Reproduced with the kind permission of the National Railway Museum Page 1 of 5 3. Dating from 1837 the following engraving shows trains on the Liverpool and Manchester Railway. Firstly a passenger train of first class coaches with a Royal Mail coach and, at the rear, a private coach mounted on a truck, secondly, a train of second class coaches and, thirdly a train of third class coaches. Liverpool and Manchester Railway 1835 4. As the years went by, greater comforts were added. Third class passengers were accommodated inside the coaches, and six-wheeled coaches, giving a smoother ride than the older four-wheeled types, were introduced. 5. Heating was however primitive and, initially, passengers had to hire hot-water bottles and blankets at stations, later it was provided using steam from the engine. To improve safety, trains started to have "continuous" brakes on all coaches, controlled by the driver, rather than just a hand brake controlled by the guard, and a "communication cord" by which passengers could raise an alarm in the event of an accident or incident on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle Town Study (Pdf)
    Rother District Council Local Development Framework 2 Battle Town Study Main Report CONTENTS MAIN DOCUMENT 1. Introduction 5 o Context and Aim 5 o Methodology and Membership of the Working Group 5 o Geography of the Study 6 o Sources of Information 7 o Structure of Document 7 2. Town Profile 9 o Heritage and Pattern of Development 9 o Population Profile 9 o Profile of Local Facilities and Services 10 o Shops 10 o Schools 10 o Economic Profile 11 o Main Employment Areas 12 o Tourism Profile 13 o Housing Profile 15 o Profile of Accessibility 16 o Trains 16 o Buses 17 o Community Transport 17 o Roads 17 o Parking 17 o Cycling 17 o Environmental and Habitats Profile 18 3. Review of Relevant Policy, Strategies, Studies and other Published Material 19 o Rother District Local Plan 19 o Rother District Core Strategy 19 o Representations Received on the Core Strategy 20 o Rother District Core Strategy Urban Options Background Paper) 20 o LDF Evidence Papers 23 o Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) 23 o Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) 23 o Affordable Housing Viability Assessment 23 o Retail Study 23 o Employment Strategy Review 24 o Leisure Facilities Strategy 24 o Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study 25 o Rother Play Strategy 25 o The East Sussex County Landscape Assessment 26 o Market Towns and Villages Landscape Assessment 26 o Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) 27 o East Sussex Local Transport Plan March 2006 28 o Battle Local Area Transport Strategy 28 o Battle Conservation Area Character Appraisal 29 o Battle Town Council Local Action Plan 29 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Rother District Local Plan (Pdf)
    Rother District Local Plan Adopted July 2006 Rother District Council Town Hall Bexhill-on-Sea East Sussex TN39 3JX Tel: 01424 787878 www.rother.gov.uk Cover photographs courtesy of Rother District Council (Except bottom photograph courtesy of Janina Holubecki/High Weald AONB unit) CONTENTS Page no. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose of the Local Plan 1 Context for the Local Plan 1 Scope and structure 2 Use of the Plan 3 2. CONTEXT AND VISION 4 Main issues 4 Relationship to the community strategy 6 Corporate plan and strategies 7 Vision and aims 7 3. THE PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR ROTHER DISTRICT 9 Planning policy framework 9 National planning policies 10 Regional planning guidance 12 The Structure Plan 12 4. DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 14 Introduction 14 Development principles 14 Housing land requirements 16 Business land requirements 17 Towards a spatial strategy 19 Development boundaries 22 Strategic gaps 23 Summary of housing land provisions 24 Managing housing land release 27 Summary of employment land provisions 28 5. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS 30 Protecting amenities 31 Design and respecting local character 32 Ensuring availability of infrastructure and services 34 Making best use of environmental resources 36 6. HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS 37 Affordable housing 37 Housing mix 40 Layout and design 41 Residential mobile homes 42 Sites for gypsies and travelling showpeople 43 Retention of housing stock 43 Extensions to dwellings 44 Extensions to residential curtilages 45 Dwellings in the countryside 45 7. COMMUNITY FACILITIES 49 New and improved community facilities 50 Recreation standards and open space facilities 50 Equestrian development 50 Renewable energy 51 Public art 53 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Tollgate-Green-Brochure-FINAL.Pdf
    1 Battle • East Sussex Contemporary country living. Welcome to Tollgate Green, a new neighbourhood for historic Battle, East Sussex. Light filled, lifetime homes of two, three and four bedrooms surrounded by beautiful countryside and close to the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Space to grow, room to breathe; convenient and connected in every sense. Welcome to the way you want to live. 2 3 Tollgate Green Tollgate Where we live is who we are, Battle • East Sussex and how we want to be Computer generated image of Tollgate Green is indicative only 4 5 Tollgate Green Tollgate Countryside living & Battle • East Sussex stunning views Computer generated image of Tollgate Green is indicative only That’s the quality of life at Tollgate Green. Sustainable and sustaining; a neighbourhood of warmth and solidity; a face-to-face community. A hall to make an entrance. Rooms for the everyday; space for the extraordinary. Bright kitchens for breakfast or homework; for what ifs, and maybe one day. A garden to grow memories, to savour the seasons. Down the path and up the lane to Battle. A scoot to school, walk or bike it. A little further on, happy trails. The call of beach and hillside, of dappled sun and earthy shadow, of good times around the corner.. Battle-of-Hastings Battlefield 6 7 Tollgate Green Tollgate Battle • East Sussex Weekend Hastings Battle, the real site of the famous Battle of Further afield, Battle station offers direct travel adventures filled Hastings, celebrates its origins at Battle Abbey to Hastings, Tunbridge Wells and London through museums and exhibitions, even Charing Cross, while connections to Brighton battlefield re-enactments.
    [Show full text]
  • Bexhill to Hastings Link Road Traffic and Transport Report
    Bexhill to Hastings Link Road Traffic and Transport Report Bexhill to Hastings Link Road Traffic and Transport Report East Sussex County Council County Hall St Anne's Crescent Lewes East Sussex 224548/002/R1 Bexhill to Hastings Link Road Traffic and Transport Report 224548/002/R1 Bexhill to Hastings Link Road Traffic and Transport Report Bexhill to Hastings Link Road Traffic and Transport Report Ver. 4 – 03/04/07 Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description Draft for Review by 0 02.11.06 NW/JR Counsel 20.11.06 Draft for Review by 1 12.12.06 NW/JR JR IJ counsel 15.12.06 Draft for Review by 2 10.01.07 NW/JR JR IJ counsel 15.01.07 Issue for Awayday 3 14.02.07 NW/JR JR IJ 22.02.07 4 03.04.07 NW/JR JR IJ Final 2245458/002/Rev1 Bexhill to Hastings Link Road Traffic and Transport Report 2245458/002/Rev1 Bexhill to Hastings Link Road Traffic and Transport Report List of Contents Page Chapters and Appendices 1 Introduction and Background ...................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................1 1.2 Background and Context..........................................................................1 1.3 Brief Description of the Scheme...............................................................4 1.4 Overview of Appraisal ..............................................................................7 2 Traffic Forecasting Methodology..............................................................8 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY a Fie'd Guide
    Sussex Industrial History — Summer 1972 (Special Issue) SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY A Fie'd Guide Other Sussex Publications from PHILLIMORE THE IMPOSSIBLE THEATRE by Leslie Evershed-Martin The story of the foundation of the Chichester Festival Theatre from an `impossible' idea. to its recognition as one of the major influences in the contemporary theatrical world. 164 pages, 16 pages plates . Standard ed . £2.75. Now available in paperback at £1 .50 THE MEMOIRS OF GAIUS CARLEY : A Sussex Blacksmith ed . by Francis W. Steer This delightful autobiography• of a country craftsman gives an informative picture of the old Sussex countryside and way of life, and has a broader appeal to all who have a feeling for old England and English traditions . 84 pages, 8 plates, cloth bound and jacketed . £1 .50 THE ROMANO-BRITISH INDUSTRIAL SITE AT BARDOWN, WADHURST by Henry Cleere An account of the excavations in the 1960s at the 2nd-century site on the River Limen. Iron was made there between 140 and 200 A .D . when the main site became a residential settlement, and industrial activity moved to satellite sites . Apart from iron, there is also evidence of tile-making and pottery . 24 pages, illustrated, paper covers . 30p THE LIFE OF ST . PHILIP HOWARD ed . by Francis W. Steer This biography, written by an anonymous contemporary priest, provides not only valu- able source material for 16th-century English religious history, but also much local interest, in that, before his long imprisonment, the Earl of Arundel played an active part in Sussex life . 100 pages, 5 plates, pedigree, cloth bound with laminated jacket .
    [Show full text]
  • Pl201217 – RR/2019/604/P Rother District Council
    pl201217 – RR/2019/604/P Rother District Council Report to - Planning Committee Date - 17 December 2020 Report of the - Tim Hickling, Head of Strategy and Planning Subject - Application RR/2019/604/P Address - Blackfriars – Land at BATTLE Proposal - Outline: Detailed proposals for a spine road to serve residential development, with vehicular access off Harrier Lane and The Spinney, with Master Plan for up to 220 dwellings and associated works. View application/correspondence RECOMMENDATION: It be RESOLVED: To GRANT (FULL/OUTLINE PLANNING) DELEGATED SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF A SECTION 106 AGREEMENT: FOR PROVISION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, LANDSCAPE/ECOLOGY WORKS AND MAINTENANCE AND HIGHWAY WORKS Head of Service: Tim Hickling Applicant: RDC, Head of Acquisitions and Transformation Agent: Robinson Escott Planning Case Officer: Mrs S. Shepherd (Email: [email protected]) Parish: BATTLE Ward Member(s): Councillor K.P. Dixon Reason for Committee consideration: Head of Service – Strategy and Planning referral: Highways Update Statutory 13 week date: 17 June 2019 Extension of time agreed to: 22 December 2020 1.0 UPDATE 1.1 There are no changes to the proposals or plans that were previously considered by the Planning Committee at its meeting on 10 October 2019. 1.2 This update arises as a result of negotiations with regard to the Section 106 legal agreement, which have led to the Highway Authority (HA) submitting additional comments in respect of the proposals, specifically with regard to consideration of potential wider impacts from the residential element of the pl201217 – RR/2019/604/P site, which they had not previously addressed. After further consideration of the proposals, the HA have a number of recommendations for additional elements to be included in the Section 106 and via conditions and these are brought back to committee for reapproval.
    [Show full text]
  • Millwood Designer Homes Ltd
    MILLWOOD DESIGNER HOMES LTD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: LILLYBANK FARM, BATTLE TRAVEL PLAN STATEMENT REPORT REF. 191631-01 June 2021 HEAD OFFICE: 3rd Floor, The Hallmark Building, 52-56 Leadenhall Street, London, EC3M 5JE T | 020 7680 4088 ESSEX: 1 - 2 Crescent Court, Billericay, Essex, CM12 9AQ T | 01277 657 677 KENT: Suite 10, Building 40, Churchill Business Centre, Kings Hill, Kent, ME19 4YU T | 01732 752 155 MIDLANDS: Office 3, The Garage Studios, 41-43 St Mary's Gate, Nottingham, NG1 1PU T | 0115 697 0940 SOUTH WEST: City Point, Temple Gate, Bristol, BS1 6PL T | 0117 456 4994 SUFFOLK: Suite 110, Suffolk Enterprise Centre, 44 Felaw Street, Ipswich, IP2 8SJ T | 01473 407 321 Email: [email protected] LILLYBANK FARM, BATTLE 191631-01 TRAVEL PLAN STATEMENT June 2021 Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 2. EXISTING SITUATION .................................................................................. 4 3. CONSENTED SCHEME .................................................................................... 9 4. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 11 5. MEASURES AND INITIATIVES .................................................................... 12 Appendices Appendix A Approved Masterplan Appendix B Welcome Pack AA/191631-01 i LILLYBANK FARM, BATTLE 191631-01 TRAVEL PLAN STATEMENT June 2021 Document Control Sheet ISSUE REV AUTHOR CHECKED APPROVED DATE PURPOSE - Draft for Review AA BS Draft 10/06/2021 Final for - AA DH KM 18/06/2021 submission Distribution This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of MILLWOOD DESIGNER HOMES LTD. It should not be reproduced in whole or in part, or relied upon by third parties, without the express written authority of Ardent Consulting Engineers. ii AA/191631-01 LILLYBANK FARM, BATTLE 191631-01 TRAVEL PLAN STATEMENT June 2021 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Rail Strategy 2021
    Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Consultation Draft September 2020 1 Contents Map of Kent Rail Network ……………………………………………………………… 3 Foreword by Roger Gough, Leader of Kent County Council ………………………. 4 Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………. 5 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………… 7 2. National Rail Policy …………………………………………………………….. 9 3. Kent’s Local Transport Policy …………………………………………………. 15 4. Key Drivers of Demand for Rail Services in Kent ………………..……….… 18 5. Rail Infrastructure Outputs Required in Kent ……………..……………….… 23 6. Rolling-Stock Outputs Required in Kent ……………………………………... 29 7. Rail Service Outcomes Required in Kent ……………………………………. 33 8. Passenger Communications and Station Facilities in Kent ………………... 42 9. Community Rail Partnerships in Kent ………………………………………... 45 10. Rail Freight Services in Kent …………………………………………..…….…49 11. International Rail Services in Kent ……………………………………………. 53 12. Conclusion …………………………………………………………………….… 56 Summary of Recommended Actions …………………………………………………. 58 Glossary of Railway Terminology……………………………………………………... 62 Sources ………………………………………………………………………………….. 63 Tables and Maps ……………………………………………………………………….. 64 Appendix A - Proposed Service Specifications ……………………………………… 65 Front cover image The new Class 800 series produced by Hitachi is one example of a new train design that could provide the bespoke additional fleet which will be required for Kent’s High Speed services. The picture shows a Class 800 train on a test run before entry into service. [source: Hitachi Ltd, 2015] 2 3 Foreword By the Leader of
    [Show full text]
  • How Sussex Will Benefit with BML2
    HowHow SussexSussex willwill benefitbenefit withwith BML2BML2 The rail project known as Brighton Main Line 2 (BML2) has profound and far-reaching benefits and opportunities for Brighton and the whole of Sussex. However, it is frequently misunderstood, which is why this document intends to explain how it all works. BML2 was devised in 2009 and comprises three phases – Sussex, Kent and London. A critical element is the Sussex phase, which this document deals with in more detail. MPs and local councils believe it will bring widespread advantages to the region in terms of vastly-improving rail travel and creating significantly better connectivity. This means renewing principal connections, which are long-standing aspirations among all local authorities, as well as introducing new 21 st century connections to the capital and its key growth areas. The whole scheme is aimed at stimulating business, engendering wealth creation, boosting tourism and, perhaps most important of all, protecting the region’s exceptional environment. SUSSEX “– a part of the country so often ignored, or left behind under previous Governments” – George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer 2015 2 “It is stark staring obvious that the second main line to London is needed. Substantially increasing capacity into our cities remains the industry’s greatest challenge. BML2 – by reconnecting Brighton with London as one seamless journey – has the potential to do this. It is therefore a strong contender for serious investment because it would strengthen the existing overloaded network” – Lord Andrew Adonis, Chairman of National Infrastructure Commission 2015 BML2’s principal focus entails fully restoring to its previous full main line status today’s branch line LONDON BRIDGE which terminates abruptly at Uckfield.
    [Show full text]