DOCSLIB.ORG

Birmingham Stormwater Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Birmingham Stormwater Plan Flood Mitigation / Stormwater Management Plan City of Birmingham October 2004 Prepared by: URS Project Number 19613329.00200 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM FLOOD MITIGATION / STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Backgroun d............................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Flood Mitigation / Stormwater Management Planning Committee................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Planning Approach ................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Agency Coordination............................................................... 1-6 1.5 Consistency with Community Rating System Floodplain Management Planning Process .............................................. 1-9 1.6 Consistency with Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 ................... 1-11 2.0 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION ............................................................... 2-1 2.1 Sources of Flooding................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Birmingham Watersheds......................................................... 2-1 2.3 Historical Flooding .................................................................. 2-4 2.4 Flood Data .............................................................................. 2-8 2.4.1 Background................................................................... 2-8 2.4.2 Flood Hazard – Damage Relationship .......................... 2-9 2.4.3 Existing Studies and Data............................................. 2-9 2.5 Safety and Health Hazards..................................................... 2-10 2.6 Flood Prone Buildings............................................................. 2-11 2.7 Critical Facilities...................................................................... 2-13 2.8 Economic Impact .................................................................... 2-14 2.9 Other Natural Hazards............................................................ 2-15 2.10 Natural and Beneficial Floodplain Functions........................... 2-18 2.11 Future Development ............................................................... 2-19 2.12 Conclusion s ............................................................................ 2-20 3.0 GOALS.............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Findings from Flood Hazard Assessment ............................... 3-1 3.2 Goals ...................................................................................... 3-2 4.0 PREVENTIVE MEASURES............................................................... 4-1 4.1 Planning.................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Open Space Preservation....................................................... 4-2 4.3 Zoning..................................................................................... 4-3 4.4 Subdivision Regulations.......................................................... 4-4 4.5 Building Codes........................................................................ 4-5 4.6 Floodplain Development Regulations ..................................... 4-6 4.7 Stormwater Management........................................................ 4-7 4.8 Conclusi ons ............................................................................ 4-8 4.9 Recommendat ions.................................................................. 4-9 i Octob er 2004 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM FLOOD MITIGATION / STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 5.0 PROPERTY PROTECTION .............................................................. 5-1 5.1 Relocation............................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Acquisition .............................................................................. 5-2 5.3 Building Elevation ................................................................... 5-3 5.4 Local Barriers.......................................................................... 5-4 5.5 Dry Flood Proofing.................................................................. 5-6 5.6 Wet Flood Proofing ................................................................. 5-7 5.7 Sewer Back-up Protection ...................................................... 5-8 5.8 Insurance................................................................................ 5-8 5.9 City’s Role............................................................................... 5-9 5.10 Conclusions ............................................................................ 5-10 5.11 Recommendations.................................................................. 5-11 6.0 EMERGENCY SERVICES ................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Flood Detection....................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Flood Warning ........................................................................ 6-2 6.3 Flood Response...................................................................... 6-3 6.4 Critical Facilities Protection..................................................... 6-4 6.5 Conclusion .............................................................................. 6-4 6.6 Recommendations.................................................................. 6-5 7.0 STRUCTURAL PROJECTS.............................................................. 7-1 7.1 Reservoirs............................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Levees .................................................................................... 7-2 7.3 Channel Modifications............................................................. 7-3 7.4 Dredging ................................................................................. 7-3 7.5 Drainage System Maintenance............................................... 7-4 7.6 Conclusions ............................................................................ 7-5 7.7 Recommendations.................................................................. 7-5 8.0 NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION ........................................... 8-1 8.1 Wetlands Protection................................................................ 8-1 8.2 Erosion and Sedimentation Control ........................................ 8-2 8.3 River Restoration .................................................................... 8-5 8.4 Best Management Practices ................................................... 8-6 8.5 Dumping Regulations.............................................................. 8-13 8.6 Conclusions ............................................................................ 8-13 8.7 Recommendations.................................................................. 8-14 9.0 PUBLIC INFORMATION................................................................... 9-1 9.1 Map Information...................................................................... 9-2 9.2 Library and Websites .............................................................. 9-3 9.3 Outreach Projects ................................................................... 9-3 9.4 Technical Assistance .............................................................. 9-4 ii Octob er 2004 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM FLOOD MITIGATION / STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 9.5 Real Estate Disclosure............................................................ 9-5 9.6 Educational Programs............................................................. 9-6 9.7 Conclusions ............................................................................ 9-6 9.8 Recommendations.................................................................. 9-7 10.0 FLOOD MITIGATION / STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN.................................................................................. 10-1 10.1 Preventio n............................................................................... 10-2 10.1.1 Ordinance Action Items............................................... 10-2 10.1.2 Map Modernization Program....................................... 10-6 10.2 Property Protection ................................................................. 10-7 10.2.1 Property Protection Action Items................................. 10-7 10.2.2 Repetitive Loss Strategy ............................................. 10-8 10.3 Emergency Services............................................................... 10-10 10.3.1 ALERT System ........................................................... 10-10 10.3.2 Emergency Services Action Items .............................. 10-10 10.4 Structur al ................................................................................ 10-11 10.4.1 Structural Action Items................................................ 10-11 10.5 Natural Resource Protection................................................... 10-13 10.5.1 Natural Resource Protection Action Items .................. 10-13 10.6 Public Information ................................................................... 10-14 10.6.1 Public Information Plan ............................................... 10-14 10.7 Stormwater Management........................................................ 10-16 10.8 CRS Program Review and Proposed Actions......................... 10-25 10.9 Potential Funding Sources for Plan Implementation ............... 10-29 10.9.1 Federal Funding.........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The East Coast Tidal Surge of 5 December 2013 Lincolnshire
    OFFICIAL Lincolnshire’s Tidal Surge Response & Recovery ‘After Action’ Report The East Coast Tidal Surge of 5th December 2013 Lincolnshire Resilience Forum’s Response & Recovery ‘After Action’ Report 20th March 2014 1 OFFICIAL Lincolnshire’s Tidal Surge Response & Recovery ‘After Action’ Report Foreword On Thursday 5th December 2013 a deepening pressure system combined with high astronomical tides and strong to gale force ‘north westerly’ winds to generate a coastal surge along the whole of the east coast of England, the largest surge since the ‘great storm’ of 1953. Due to advances in surge forecasting, flood prediction and contingency planning at national, sub-national and local levels we were able to ‘get ahead’ of the storm. From Tuesday 3rd December partners began deploying one of the largest multi-agency emergency response and recovery operations ever conducted in Lincolnshire. This included the most significant evacuation operation in recent memory, the rescue of a number of people who became isolated by floodwaters, and work to ensure critical services were maintained and damaged infrastructure quickly repaired. Thankfully there were only 3 (relatively minor) casualties as a result of the surge, but more than 720 residential and commercial properties were inundated from the resultant overtopping and breach of defences. I would like to pass on my sympathy and support to those whose households and businesses flooded. We continue to work to support a full community recovery, and I commend the work of colleagues at Boston Borough Council who have led this work. In the circumstances this was a very good, forecast-led response and recovery effort.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005
    MARCH 2008 ANNUAL SUMMARY 1109 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005 JOHN L. BEVEN II, LIXION A. AVILA,ERIC S. BLAKE,DANIEL P. BROWN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, RICHARD D. KNABB,RICHARD J. PASCH,JAMIE R. RHOME, AND STACY R. STEWART Tropical Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 2 November 2006, in final form 30 April 2007) ABSTRACT The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active of record. Twenty-eight storms occurred, includ- ing 27 tropical storms and one subtropical storm. Fifteen of the storms became hurricanes, and seven of these became major hurricanes. Additionally, there were two tropical depressions and one subtropical depression. Numerous records for single-season activity were set, including most storms, most hurricanes, and highest accumulated cyclone energy index. Five hurricanes and two tropical storms made landfall in the United States, including four major hurricanes. Eight other cyclones made landfall elsewhere in the basin, and five systems that did not make landfall nonetheless impacted land areas. The 2005 storms directly caused nearly 1700 deaths. This includes approximately 1500 in the United States from Hurricane Katrina— the deadliest U.S. hurricane since 1928. The storms also caused well over $100 billion in damages in the United States alone, making 2005 the costliest hurricane season of record. 1. Introduction intervals for all tropical and subtropical cyclones with intensities of 34 kt or greater; Bell et al. 2000), the 2005 By almost all standards of measure, the 2005 Atlantic season had a record value of about 256% of the long- hurricane season was the most active of record.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding After Storm Desmond PERC UK 2015 Flooding in Cumbria After Storm Desmond PERC UK 2015
    Flooding after Storm Desmond PERC UK 2015 Flooding in Cumbria after Storm Desmond PERC UK 2015 The storms that battered the north of England and parts of Scotland at the end of 2015 and early 2016 caused significant damage and disruption to families and businesses across tight knit rural communities and larger towns and cities. This came just two years after Storm Xaver inflicted significant damage to the east coast of England. Flooding is not a new threat to the residents of the Lake District, but the severity of the events in December 2015 certainly appears to have been regarded as surprising. While the immediate priority is always to ensure that defence measures are overwhelmed. We have also these communities and businesses are back up on their looked at the role of community flood action groups feet as quickly and effectively as possible, it is also in the response and recovery from severe flooding. important that all those involved in the response take Our main recommendations revolve around three key the opportunity to review their own procedures and themes. The first is around flood risk communication, actions. It is often the case that when our response is including the need for better communication of hazard, put to the test in a ‘real world’ scenario that we risk and what actions to take when providing early discover things that could have been done better, or warning services to communities. The second centres differently, and can make changes to ensure continuous around residual risk when the first line of flood improvement. This is true of insurers as much as it is of defences, typically the large, constructed schemes central and local government and the emergency protecting entire cities or areas, are either breached services, because events like these demand a truly or over-topped.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Storm Xaver Over Europe in December 2013: Overview of Energy Impacts and North Sea Events
    Supplement of Adv. Geosci., 54, 137–147, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-54-137-2020-supplement © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of Storm Xaver over Europe in December 2013: Overview of energy impacts and North Sea events Anthony James Kettle Correspondence to: Anthony James Kettle ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. SECTION I. Supplement figures Figure S1. Wind speed (10 minute average, adjusted to 10 m height) and wind direction on 5 Dec. 2013 at 18:00 GMT for selected station records in the National Climate Data Center (NCDC) database. Figure S2. Maximum significant wave height for the 5–6 Dec. 2013. The data has been compiled from CEFAS-Wavenet (wavenet.cefas.co.uk) for the UK sector, from time series diagrams from the website of the Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrolographie (BSH) for German sites, from time series data from Denmark's Kystdirektoratet website (https://kyst.dk/soeterritoriet/maalinger-og-data/), from RWS (2014) for three Netherlands stations, and from time series diagrams from the MIROS monthly data reports for the Norwegian platforms of Draugen, Ekofisk, Gullfaks, Heidrun, Norne, Ormen Lange, Sleipner, and Troll. Figure S3. Thematic map of energy impacts by Storm Xaver on 5–6 Dec. 2013. The platform identifiers are: BU Buchan Alpha, EK Ekofisk, VA? Valhall, The wind turbine accident letter identifiers are: B blade damage, L lightning strike, T tower collapse, X? 'exploded'. The numbers are the number of customers (households and businesses) without power at some point during the storm.
    [Show full text]
  • London's Flood Risk and Flood Defence Management in Times of Climate
    Bachelor of Science in Umweltwissenschaften (Environmental Science) Bachelor thesis Topic: London’s flood risk and flood defence management in times of climate change written by: Diana Süsser Supervising mentor: Prof. Dr. Ingo Mose Second mentor: Dr. Stuart Downward Oldenburg, 30 September 2010 1 Abstract (English version) The thesis analyses the subject of flooding and its management in the London Thames estuary. Flooding is an important topic for the large metropolis London and contains a high risk for people, their properties and our environment. London's catchment is crossed by the river Thames and provides a low lying coastal area which was affected by historical storm surges from time to time. The current flood defences including walls, embankments, barriers, gates and culverts offer a high standard of protection. However, there is a disagreement between the present defence and required protection in the future. This prospective flooding will be affected a rising sea level, increasing tide surges, severe and frequent rain storms as well as land movement caused by climate and environmental change. Therefore and because of the fact that the defences will reach the end of their term. This requires a long-term flood management in order to preserve the standard of protection through adaptation to the changing conditions. There are various options that including the improvement and rising of present defences, the construction of new defences and the structure of a new barrier in the main Thames river. In the end, a decision about the future flood risk management is approximately made until 2050, including a first investment programme up to 2049.
    [Show full text]
  • MAS8306 Topics in Statistics: Environmental Extremes
    MAS8306 Topics in Statistics: Environmental Extremes Dr. Lee Fawcett Semester 2 2017/18 1 Background and motivation 1.1 Introduction Finally, there is almost1 a global consensus amongst scientists that our planet’s climate is changing. Evidence for climatic change has been collected from a variety of sources, some of which can be used to reconstruct the earth’s changing climates over tens of thousands of years. Reasonably complete global records of the earth’s surface tempera- ture since the early 1800’s indicate a positive trend in the average annual temperature, and maximum annual temperature, most noticeable at the earth’s poles. Glaciers are considered amongst the most sensitive indicators of climate change. As the earth warms, glaciers retreat and ice sheets melt, which – over the last 30 years or so – has resulted in a gradual increase in sea and ocean levels. Apart from the consequences on ocean ecosystems, rising sea levels pose a direct threat to low–lying inhabited areas of land. Less direct, but certainly noticeable in the last fiteen years or so, is the effect of rising sea levels on the earth’s weather systems. A larger amount of warmer water in the Atlantic Ocean, for example, has certainly resulted in stronger, and more frequent, 1Almost... — 3 — 1 Background and motivation tropical storms and hurricanes; unless you’ve been living under a rock over the last few years, you would have noticed this in the media (e.g. Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Superstorm Sandy in 2012). Most recently, and as reported in the New York Times in January 2018, the 2017 hurricane season was “..
    [Show full text]
  • The Winter Floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a Review
    National Hydrological Monitoring Programme The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review by Terry Marsh, Celia Kirby, Katie Muchan, Lucy Barker, Ed Henderson & Jamie Hannaford National Hydrological Monitoring Programme The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review by Terry Marsh, Celia Kirby, Katie Muchan, Lucy Barker, Ed Henderson & Jamie Hannaford CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY & HYDROLOGY l [email protected] l www.ceh.ac.uk [i] This report should be cited as Marsh, T.J.1, Kirby, C.2, Muchan, K.1, Barker, L.1, Henderson, E.2 and Hannaford, J.1 2016. The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK. 37 pages. Affiliations: 1Centre for Ecology & Hydrology; 2British Hydrological Society. ISBN: 978-1-906698-61-4 Publication address Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building Benson Lane Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB UK General and business enquiries: +44 (0)1491 838800 E-mail: [email protected] [ii] The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review THE WINTER FLOODS OF 2015/2016 IN THE UK – A REVIEW This report was produced by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH), the UK’s centre for excellence for research in land and freshwater environmental sciences, in collaboration with the British Hydrological Society (BHS) which promotes all aspects of the inter-disciplinary subject of hydrology – the scientific study and practical applications of the movement, distribution and quality of freshwater in the environment. Funding support was provided by the Natural Environment Research Council. CEH and BHS are extremely grateful to the many individuals and organisations that provided data and background information for this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • FLOODING MANIFESTO the Flooding Manifesto
    THE FLOODING MANIFESTO The Flooding Manifesto Introduction he December 2015 floods frequent, more extensive and were marked, not just by the longer duration flooding events. extent of flooding to homes, This is an unsustainable and T property and agricultural inequitable outcome, which causes land, but also by the damage to damage to farming businesses and infrastructure caused by a succession rural communities. of storms bringing heavy rain. While the December 2015 floods were locally The NFU’s preferred approach is for devastating, they were just the latest in government to establish a long-term, a continuing series of extreme weather strategic plan for flood and coastal events that have taken place over the risk management. This plan must past few years. be designed to cope with extreme events and take a whole catchment The UK food and farming sector approach to management decisions contributes some £108 billion to the and intervention. Consideration economy through its capacity to should also be given to the impacts of produce high quality food. The agri- infrastructure and development on food sector as a whole employs 13% of agricultural land. the UK’s population. But UK farming also delivers a range of environmental Crucially, the importance and benefits, maintains landscapes, and contribution of our food and farming helps protects critical infrastructure. sectors to the economy must not be overlooked; some of our most It is estimated that the costs of productive and highest value the 2007 and 2013/14 floods on agricultural land is in the floodplain or agricultural businesses were £50m and coastal regions that are vulnerable to £19m respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Application and Verification of ECMWF Products 2018
    UK UK Application and verification of ECMWF products 2018 Met Office. Contributing authors: Dan Suri, Marion Mittermaier, Rob Neal, Ric Crocker, Helen Titley and Becky Stretton. 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF output is widely used by the Met Office at many timescales, especially the week 2 period where the Met Office is particularly dependant on ECMWF output. The heaviest users of ECMWF output are the Chief and Deputy Chief Meteorologists, who provide forecast guidance across the organisation for areas around the world and hydrometeorologists at the Flood Forecasting Centre. ECMWF output also forms part of 'BestData', a multi-model blend producing site-specific forecasts available, for example, on the Met Office public website. Meanwhile, the Met Office have been actively engaged in producing some novel and innovative tools to help operational meteorologists visualize ensemble output, creating and verifying regional weather regime forecasts via a tool known internally as the Decider system and developing a global hazard map, which includes a focus on tropical cyclones. 2. Use and application of products 2.1 Post-processing of ECMWF model output 2.1.1 Statistical adaptation Nothing to report. 2.1.2 Physical adaptation Nothing to report. 2.1.3 Derived fields The end of February and first days of March 2018 saw the most severe outbreak of cold winter weather in the UK for several years, as well as over much of western Europe, compounded by Storm Emma which came from the south and generated exceptional blizzards and freezing rain in the south of the country. The cold outbreak had been well predicted in advance, firstly from long-range predictions of a Sudden Stratospheric Warming increasing the risk of blocking, and then two weeks ahead from the Decider system.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentary Records of Coastal Storm Surges: Evidence of the 1953 North Sea Event
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by White Rose Research Online This is a repository copy of Sedimentary records of coastal storm surges: Evidence of the 1953 North Sea event. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/135159/ Version: Published Version Article: Swindles, G.T., Galloway, J.M., Macumber, A.L. et al. (11 more authors) (2018) Sedimentary records of coastal storm surges: Evidence of the 1953 North Sea event. Marine Geology, 403. pp. 262-270. ISSN 0025-3227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2018.06.013 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Marine Geology 403 (2018) 262–270 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margo Sedimentary records of coastal storm surges: Evidence of the 1953 North Sea event T Graeme T. Swindlesa,⁎, Jennifer M. Gallowayb, Andrew L. Macumberc, Ian W. Croudaced, Andy R. Emerye, Clare Wouldsa, Mark D.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....……………
    APRIL 2006 VOLUME 48 NUMBER 4 SSTORMTORM DDATAATA AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: An F3 tornado destroyed this one-story house in Bellsburg, Tennessee on April 7, 2006. The truck was parked outside and was blown into the basement. Debris from this home was hurled at least 100 yards away. In Dickson County alone, there were 25 homes destroyed, 8 with major damage, and 24 homes and businesses with moderate damage. (Photo courtesy: Jerry Orchanian, WCM Nashville) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month …..…………….….........……..…………..…….…..…..... 4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....……………...........….............. 5 Reference Notes..................................................................................................................................... 439 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: William Angel Assistant Editors: Stuart Hinson and Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events re- sulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confi rmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. Except for limited editing to correct grammatical errors, the data in Storm Data are published as received.
    [Show full text]
  • The Winter Floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a Review
    National Hydrological Monitoring Programme The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review by Terry Marsh, Celia Kirby, Katie Muchan, Lucy Barker, Ed Henderson & Jamie Hannaford National Hydrological Monitoring Programme The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review by Terry Marsh, Celia Kirby, Katie Muchan, Lucy Barker, Ed Henderson & Jamie Hannaford CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY & HYDROLOGY l [email protected] l www.ceh.ac.uk [i] This report should be cited as Marsh, T.J.1, Kirby, C.2, Muchan, K.1, Barker, L.1, Henderson, E.2 and Hannaford, J.1 2016. The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK. 37 pages. Affiliations: 1Centre for Ecology & Hydrology; 2British Hydrological Society. ISBN: 978-1-906698-61-4 Publication address Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building Benson Lane Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB UK General and business enquiries: +44 (0)1491 838800 E-mail: [email protected] [ii] The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review THE WINTER FLOODS OF 2015/2016 IN THE UK – A REVIEW This report was produced by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH), the UK’s centre for excellence for research in land and freshwater environmental sciences, in collaboration with the British Hydrological Society (BHS) which promotes all aspects of the inter-disciplinary subject of hydrology – the scientific study and practical applications of the movement, distribution and quality of freshwater in the environment. Funding support was provided by the Natural Environment Research Council. CEH and BHS are extremely grateful to the many individuals and organisations that provided data and background information for this publication.
    [Show full text]