DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATA SHEET CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AC1077 Public Disclosure Authorized Date ISDS Prepared/Updated: October 21, 2004 I. BASIC INFORMATION A. Basic Project Data Country: Western Africa Project ID: P092473 Project Name: Africa Emergency Locust Task Team Leader: Peter Kristensen Project Estimated Appraisal Date: November 1, Estimated Board Date: December 16, 2004 2004 Managing Unit: AFTS4 Lending Instrument: Emergency Recovery Public Disclosure Authorized Loan Sector: Crops (100%) Theme: Other environment and natural resources management (P); Environmental policies and institutions (S) Safeguard Policies Specialists in the task team: Isabelle Paris, Sr Environmental Spec, AFTS4 Loan/Credit amount ($m.): IDA: 90 Other financing amounts by source: ($m) B. Project Objectives [from section 2 of PCN] Public Disclosure Authorized The overarching Goal of the proposed project is to contribute to a reduction in hardship on people and the environment imposed by locust invasions. It is the rural poor people who suffer most from the effects locust infestation. The effects of locust infestations on rural people are loss of crops for food, loss of revenue from trading agriculture products, and the risk posed on people and the environment from risk associated with application, handling and storage of pesticides. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to assist with management of locust infestation and its impact on people and the environment in Chad, Niger, Burkina Faso, Mali, Mauritania, Senegal and The Gambia. The evidence that the next locust infestation in countries will be managed in a timely fashion would measure the achievement of this objective. C. Project Description [from section 3 of PCN] Public Disclosure Authorized Project will include emergency activities, post-emergency recovery activities, and activities for improved preparedness for the future. Activities are divided into four components: Component A: Emergency Locust Management The output from this component is that emergency and long-term locust management actions are improved (cost-effective, timely), and undertaken in environmental and social sustainable manner. The following activities will be appraised: • Emergency Locust Campaign: Evaluate needs for pesticides (short and long-term), acquisition of equipment, aircraft rental, and operating cost. Activities should feed into the national plan for locust management. • Pesticide inventory storage, safeguarding: The purpose is to ensure i) that pesticides are stored in a safe manner following international standards, and ii) verify that only pesticides allowed by the country are used (no banned products, no Persistent Organic Pollutants). Where needed pesticides storage sites should be upgraded to meet international standards for storage of pesticides. • Locust Management Financing Mechanism (for future campaigns): The major obstacle for addressing the locust problem in 2003-2004 was a lack of funds provided in a timely manner. For this reason, the AELP will seek to set up a financing mechanism (possibly housed within ECOWAS who holds other emergency funds). An endowment of two million from each country would form the basis for this Locust Emergency Fund, which could be accessed by each country on a matching grant basis, or other methods to be defined as part of the project. • Obsolete pesticide disposal: Obsolete pesticides (pesticides that are unfit for use, unwanted, or persistent organic pollutants) pose a risk to poor rural people as well as to the local, regional and global environment. The project would finance the repackaging, transport and incineration of such obsolete pesticides. This would be done in collaboration with the Africa Stockpiles Program, a partnership with the FAO, WWF International, and others. Component B: Emergency Agriculture Investments The output of this component is that agriculture productivity in priority rural areas damaged by locusts is improved. The project would provide seeds and fertilizers to rural farmers so that they can restore their livelihood. The type of support to be provided through this component is to be appraised in details, but include provision of ‘starter packs’, and may also include working through existing community driven development or social projects. The FAO, CILSS and WFP are undertaking an analysis for each country affected by the locust that will results in an estimation of the a) need for emergency food supply (WFP will issue and appeal in the beginning of November), and b) needs for restoration of agriculture productivity (FAO will issue and appeal in the beginning of November). The financing of activities under this component will complement that of other donors and be within the framework of the needs expressed by FAO and WFP. Component C: National Capacity for Early Warning The output of this component will be that the national capacity for monitoring and reporting of future outbreaks is improved. It is anticipated that the activities top be appraised and proposed under this component will complement those activities undertaken through the FAO managed EMPRES project (financed by the Africa Development Bank). The appraisal will identify what types of financing is required to top off the existing committed financing of early warning systems in the countries. Component D: Project Management The output of this component will be that the project is managed (that is, designed, adjusted, monitored and evaluated) effectively to meet the, possibly, shifting requirements and priorities of the effort of assisting with management of locust infestation and its impact on people and the environment in concerned countries. D. Project location (if known) The project will intervene in seven countries: Senegal, The Gambia, Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Chad. E. Borrower’s Institutional Capacity for Safeguard Policies [from PCN] Each country has some institutional capacity for managing safeguards as each of the countries have prepared Pest Management Plans as part of the requirements for disbursing PPF Advances provided during the Identification Mission. II. SAFEGUARD POLICIES THAT MIGHT APPLY Safeguard Policy Applicable? If Applicable, How Might It Apply? [X] Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) Triggered because the project will be designing an obsolete pesticide disposal component during the project. A separate EA for this component will be prepared during the project. [ ] Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) [X] Pest Management (OP 4.09) Triggered because countries will be undertaking spraying with pesticides. [ ] Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) [ ] Indigenous Peoples (OD 4.20) [ ] Forests (OP/BP 4.36) [ ] Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) [ ] Cultural Property (draft OP 4.11 - OPN 11.03) [ ] Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP/GP 7.60)* [ ] Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP/GP 7.50) Environmental Assessment Category: [ ] A [X] B [ ] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD (to be determined) The project is currently assessed to be category B. Appraisal of the project will determine whether it is necessary to change the EA category. III. SAFEGUARD PREPARATION PLAN A. Target date for the Quality Enhancement Review (QER), at which time the PAD-stage ISDS would be prepared. The project will be processed under OP/BP 8.50 for Emergency Recovery Loan, and a QER will not be required. B. For simple projects that will not require a QER, the target date for preparing the PAD-stage ISDS A PAD will not be required due the processing under the OP/BP 8.50 for Emergency Recovery Loan. Instead a Memorandum of the President with Technical Annexes will be prepared. The MOP will be finalized by October 31, 2004. C. Time frame for launching and completing the safeguard-related studies that may be needed. The specific studies and their timing1 should be specified in the PAD-stage ISDS. Due to the processing under OP/BP 8.50 for Emergency Recovery Loan, the EA will be required one year after board approval. This EA will outline the types of environmental impact that could arise from implementation of the project, in particular activities related to Emergency Agriculture Investments (Component B). The scope of the EA would be to ensure that potential negative impact is prevented. In addition, country specific Pest Management Plans (PMP) will be required prior to effectiveness, and likely to be prepared between Mid November and end of December. These PMPs will outline the countries policy on pest management, rules and regulations related to pest * By supporting the proposed project, the Bank does not intend to prejudice the final determination of the parties’ claims on the disputed areas 1 Reminder: The Bank’s Disclosure Policy requires that safeguard-related documents be disclosed before appraisal (i) at the InfoShop and (ii) in-country, at publicly accessible locations and in a form and language that are accessible to potentially affected persons. management, plans for management of pesticides (including the types of products that will be used), and outline of how potential negative impact will be managed. IV. APPROVALS Signed and submitted by: Task Team Leader: Peter Kristensen 10/21/04 Approved by: Regional Safeguards Coordinator: Thomas Walton Comments Sector Manager: Mary Barton Dock Comments .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Locusts in Queensland
    LOCUSTS Locusts in Queensland PEST STATUS REVIEW SERIES – LAND PROTECTION by C.S. Walton L. Hardwick J. Hanson Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the many people who provided information for this assessment. Clyde McGaw, Kevin Strong and David Hunter, from the Australian Plague Locust Commission, are also thanked for the editorial review of drafts of the document. Cover design: Sonia Jordan Photographic credits: Natural Resources and Mines staff ISBN 0 7345 2453 6 QNRM03033 Published by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld. February 2003 Information in this document may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Land Protection Department of Natural Resources and Mines GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Q 4000 #16401 02/03 Contents 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Taxonomy.................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 History ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Outbreaks across Australia ........................................................................................ 3 3.2 Outbreaks in Queensland........................................................................................... 3 4.0 Current and predicted distribution ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Impact of Desert Locust to Nutrition Security in SOMALIA
    POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DESERT LOCUST Emma Apo Ouma TO NUTRITION SECURITY IN SOMALIA WHAT IS THE CURRENT SITUATION? •Triple threat of Desert Locust, Gu flooding and COVID-19, •April and June 2020, an estimated 2.7 million people across Somalia are expected to face Crisis and deteriorate to 3.5 million between July and September 2020 WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR NUTRITION SECURITY? CROP AND PASTURE DAMAGE Threat to current Gu season crop production and may also threaten pasture availability and crop cultivation across Somalia through the following 2020 Deyr (October-December A swarm can eat enough food in one day to feed 34 million people. FALLING LIVESTOCK PRICES •Livestock diseases •Poor livestock nutrition; increased price of livestock feed •Reduced quality of livestock products eg milk, meat LOSS OF LIVELIHOODS •Disruption of food systems; critical value chains have been affected e.g. livestock, cereals such as sorghum, maize •Loss of wage and employment opportunities e.g. labor in the fields, value chain actors •Increase in livelihood based coping strategy: eg selling last breeding animal, spent savings, begging, reduced expenditure on livestock and agriculture •Reduced spending on non-food needs health care, education FOOD CONSUMPTION AND DIETARY DIVERSITY •With poor harvests, there is likelihood of poor food consumption at hhd level •Depletion of food stocks •Food Prices have increased •A majority if households rely on markets for food: increased reliance on purchased and processed foods •Compromise the nutrition of the most vulnerable: children less than 5, PLW, elderly, adolesents •Increased rates of acute malnutrition ONGOING EFFORTS Household Level Screening and referral of acute malnutrition cases Targeting of the most vulnerable (UCT) Community level ▪Burying locusts, setting fires, and making noise to scare them off.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for POP Pesticides
    Guidance for POP pesticides 1. Background on POP pesticides POPs Pesticides originate almost entirely from anthropogenic sources and are associated largely with the manufacture, use and disposition of certain organic chemicals. Of the initial 12 POPs chemicals, eight are POPs pesticide. In the new POP list, five chemicals may be categorised as pesticides. These are alpha hexachlorocyclohexane (alpha-HCH), beta hexachlorocyclohexane (beta-HCH), Chlordecone, Lindane (gamma, 1,2,3,4,5,6- hexaclorocyclohexane) and Pentachlorobenzene. This module addresses baseline data gathering and assessment of POPs pesticides. Particular care is required to address DDT due to its use for vector control and Lindane due to its use for control of ecto-parasites in veterinary and human application, which may be under the responsibility of authorities other than those responsible for primarily agricultural chemicals. In addition, it is important that all uses of HCB, alpha hexachorocyclohexane, beta hexachlorocyclohexane and pentachlorobenzene (industrial as well as pesticide) be properly addressed. Specialists with knowledge of each of these areas might be included in the task teams. 2. Objective To review and summarize the production, use, import and export of the chemicals listed in Annex A and Annex B of the Convention (excluding other chemicals listed under Annex A and B which are not considered as pesticides). To gather information on stockpiles and wastes containing, or thought to contain, POPs pesticides. To assess the legal and institutional framework for control of the production, use, import, export and disposal of the chemicals listed in Annex A and Annex B (excluding other chemicals which are not classed as pesticides) of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodical Cicadas SP 341 3/21 21-0190 Programs in Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4-H Youth Development, Family and Consumer Sciences, and Resource Development
    SP 341 Periodical Cicadas Frank A. Hale, Professor Originally developed by Harry Williams, former Professor Emeritus and Jaime Yanes Jr., former Assistant Professor Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology The periodical cicada, Magicicada species, has the broods have been described by scientists and are longest developmental period of any insect in North designated by Roman numerals. There are three 13-year America. There is probably no insect that attracts as cicada broods (XIX, XXII and XXIII) and 12 17-year much attention in eastern North America as does the cicada broods (I-X, XIII, and XIV). Also, there are three periodical cicada. Their sudden springtime emergence, distinct species of 17-year cicadas (M. septendecim, filling the air with their high-pitched, shrill-sounding M. cassini, and M. septendecula) and three species of songs, excites much curiosity. 13-year cicadas (M. tredecim, M. tredecassini, and M. tredecula). Two races of the periodical cicada exist. One race has a life cycle of 13 years and is common in the southeastern In Tennessee, Brood XIX of the 13-year cicada had a United States. The other race has a life cycle of 17 years spectacular emergence in 2011 (Map 1). In 2004 and and is generally more northern in distribution. Due 2021, Brood X of the 17-year cicada primarily emerged to Tennessee’s location, both the 13-year and 17-year in East Tennessee (Map 2). Brood X has the largest cicadas occur in the state. emergence of individuals for the 17-year cicada in the United States. Brood XXIII of the 13-year cicada last Although periodical cicadas have a 13- or 17-year cycle, emerged in West Tennessee in 2015 (Map 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshoppered: America's Response to the 1874
    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: Grasshoppered: America’s Response to the 1874 Rocky Mountain Locust Invasion Full Citation: Alexandra M Wagner, “Grasshoppered: America’s Response to the 1874 Rocky Mountain Locust Invasion,” Nebraska History 89 (2008): 154-167 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH2008Grasshoppered.pdf Date: 2/11/2014 Article Summary: It was a plague of biblical proportions, influencing generations of federal agricultural policy . and foreshadowing today’s expectations about the government’s role during natural disasters. Cataloging Information: Names: Swain Finch, Solomon Butcher, H Westermann, Robert W Furnas, Thomas A Osborn, E O C Ord, N A M Dudley, Jeffrey Lockwood, John S Pillsbury, John L Pennington Keywords: Swain Finch, H Westermann, Robert W Furnas, Thomas A Osborn, Rocky Mountain locust (Melanoplus spretus), Nebraska Relief and Aid Association,
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshoppers
    Grasshoppers Orthoptera: Acrididae Plains Lubber Pictured grasshoppers Great crested grasshopper Snakeweed grasshoppers Primary Pest Grasshoppers • Migratory grasshopper • Twostriped grasshopper • Differential grasshopper • Redlegged grasshopper • Clearwinged grasshopper Twostriped Grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus Redlegged Grasshopper, Melanoplus femurrubrum Differential Grasshopper, Melanoplus differentialis Migratory Grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes Clearwinged Grasshopper Camnula pellucida Diagram courtesy of Alexandre Latchininsky, University of Wyoming Photograph courtesy of Jean-Francoise Duranton, CIRAD Grasshoppers lay pods of eggs below ground Grasshopper Egg Pods Molting is not for wimps! Grasshopper Nymphs Some grasshoppers found in winter and early spring Velvet-striped grasshopper – a common spring species Grasshopper Controls • Weather (rainfall mediated primarily) • Natural enemies – Predators, diseases • Treatment of breeding areas • Biological controls • Row covers Temperature and rainfall are important mortality factors Grasshoppers and Rainfall Moisture prior to egg hatch generally aids survival – Newly hatched young need succulent foliage Moisture after egg hatch generally reduces problems – Assists spread of diseases – Allows for plenty of food, reducing competition for rangeland and crops Grasshopper predators Robber Flies Larvae of many blister beetles develop on grasshopper egg pods Blister beetle larva Fungus-killed Grasshoppers Pathogen: Entomophthora grylli Mermis nigrescens, a nematode parasite of grasshoppers
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Biopesticides in Desert Locust Management
    THE FUTURE OF BIOPESTICIDES IN DESERT LOCUST MANAGEMENT REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP HELD IN SALY, SENEGAL 12-15 FEBRUARY 2007 i The workshop was organized with support from: International Fund for Agricultural Development International Organization of the Francophonie World Bank Rapporteur: Joyce Magor FAO/AGPP Documents: The workshop documents are available on CD. The CD’s as well as hardcopies of the report can de obtained from FAO/AGPP Please send your requests to: James Everts FAO/AGPP. Via delle terme di Carracalla 00150 Rome, Italy e-mail: [email protected] tel: +39 5705 3477 Correspondence on the workshop and the report should be directed at James Everts The opinions expressed in this document represent those of the participants of the Workshop and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the FAO, the Worldbank, OIF, IFAD or the Government of Senegal. ii The Future of Biopesticides Acronyms and abbreviations AGRHYMET Centre de formation et d'information en agro-hydro-météorologie Centre for Training and information on Agrometeorology and Hydrology APLC Australian Plague Locust Commission BCP Biological Control Products SA (Pty) Ltd CABI CAB International CERES-Locustox Centre for Ecotoxicological Research in the Sahel CFA Coopération financière d'Afrique CILSS Comité permanent Inter-états de Lutte contre la Sécheresse dans le Sahel Permanent Interstate Committee for Drought Control in the Sahel CLCPRO Commission de lutte contre le Criquet Pèlerin dans la Région Occidentale Commission for controlling the Desert
    [Show full text]
  • ENTOMOPHAGY OUTLINE I. What Is It (SLIDE 2) II. Brief History Of
    ENTOMOPHAGY OUTLINE I. What is it (SLIDE 2) II. Brief History of Entomophagy (SLIDE 3) a. In the Middle East, as far back as the 8th century BC, servants were thought to have carried locusts arranged on sticks to royal banquets in the palace of Asurbanipal (Ninivé). b. The first reference to entomophagy in Europe was in Greece (SLIDE 4), where eating cicadas was considered a delicacy. Literature from ancient China also cites the practice of entomophagy. Li Shizhen’s Compendium of Materia Medica, one of the largest and most comprehensive books on Chinese medicine during the Ming Dynasty in China (1368– 1644), displays an impressive record of all foods, including a large number of insects. The compendium also highlights the medicinal benefits of the insects. c. The practice of eating insects (SLIDE 5) is cited throughout religious literature in the Christian, Jewish and Islamic faiths. d. The Bible speaks of locusts as food in the book of Leviticus, most probably in reference to the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. (SLIDE 6) Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth (Leviticus 11: 21) 1 Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind (Leviticus 11: 22) e. (SLIDE 7) There are 8 species of flying insects permitted to be eaten in the Torah … 2 grasshoppers, 2 crickets, and 4 locust.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment of the Sudan
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SUDAN LOCUST CONTROL PROJECT 650 - 0087 United States Agency for International Development Mission to Sudan Khartoum, Sudan August, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBR3EVIATIONS SECTION 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Purpose of Assessment 2.1 AID Environmental Procedures 2.2 Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Locust Control 2.3 Environmental and Pesticide Legislation/Sudan 3.0 Scoping Procedure 4.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives 4.1 Elack.ground 4.2 Project Goals, Purpose and Output 4.3 Other Donor Activities 4.4 Analysis of Alternatives 4.4.1 Economical 4.4.2 Political 4.4.3 Environmental 5.0 Environment to be Affected by Action 5.1 Human Population 5.2 Farks. Reserves and Sanctuaries 5.3 Rare, Endangered and Migratory Species 5.4 Agricultural Resources 5.4.1 Mechanized Rainfed Sector 5.4.2 Rainfed Traditional Sector 5.4.3 Pastoralists 6.0 Environmental Assessment of Action 6.1 Selection of Insecticides for Locust/Grasshopper Control 6.1.1 USEPA Registration Status of Selected Insecticides and Recommendations of the L/G PEA 6.1.2 Field Testing of Selected Insecticides 6.1.3 Selection of Pesticides for Sudan Program 2 6.3 Application Methods and Equipment 6.3.1 Aerial 6.3.2 Ground C.14 Acute and Long Term Environmental Tox.icological Hazards 6.5 Efficacy of Selected Insecticides for L/G Control 6.6 Effect of Selected Insecticides on Non- Target Organisms and the Natural Environm 6.7 Conditions Under Which Insecticides are to Used 6.8 Availability and Effectiveness
    [Show full text]
  • Plague Locusts, Wingless Grasshoppers and Livestock Residues
    Plague locusts, wingless grasshoppers and livestock residues Photo courtesy APLC Australian plague locust swarm over cereal crop Locust numbers can periodically The most effective means of controlling build up and pose a significant threat these pests is to spray the nymph to grain, horticultural crops and stages, either by air or ground rig, with pastures. Wingless and small plague an appropriate insecticide. However, grasshoppers can also cause crop and the chemicals used have the potential pasture damage in some areas. to cause residues in grazing livestock – residues that can cause problems for Locusts can migrate hundreds of our export industry. kilometres. Depending on the nature and scale of locust activity, individual Control authorities use licensed ground landholders, state and territory and aerial operators to mix and apply government authorities and the control chemicals. Landholders must Australian Plague Locust Commission apply the same level of professional care. (APLC) may all be engaged in the control of locusts. Plague locusts, wingless grasshoppers and livestock residues National Vendor Declaration How do livestock become contaminated? It is essential that the National Vendor Declaration (NVD) is completed correctly, Livestock can be exposed to plague locust including the relevant question which relates and wingless grasshopper control to withholding periods (WHP) for fodder. chemicals by: The WHP question for fodder within the • direct over-spraying of livestock respective NVDs can be found as follows; • grazing of pastures or crops that have for Cattle – Question 7, Sheep and Lambs – been sprayed Question 5, Goats – Question 4, Bobby Calves – Question 3 and EU Cattle – • feeding fodder (hay, grain) that has been Question 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing and Eliminating the Use of Persistent Organic Pesticides
    Reducing and Eliminating the use of Persistent Organic Pesticides Guidance on alternative strategies for sustainable pest and vector management Johan Mörner, Robert Bos and Marjon Fredrix Geneva, 2002 1 Alternatives to POPs pesticides - a guidance document About the authors Johan Mörner (M.Sc. Agronomy of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) has 15 years of experience working with pest management research in Sweden and eight years managing projects on IPM, pesticide safety and alternative control methods in East and southern Africa. He currently works as a consultant on pest and pesticide management issues both in Sweden and abroad. Robert Bos (M.Sc. Medical Biology/M.Sc. Immunology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands) joined the World Health Organization in 1981 on assignment in Costa Rica before transferring to the Secretariat of the WHO/FAO/UNEP Panel of Experts on Environmental Management for Vector Control (PEEM) at WHO head- quarters. In his current position of scientist in the Water, Sanitation and Health Unit of WHO he combines responsibilities for PEEM work and for the broader health agenda associated with water resources development and management. Marjon Fredrix (M.Sc. in Tropical Agronomy, Wageningen University, the Nether- lands) presently works for the Global IPM Facility at FAO in Rome. Between 1987 and 1998 she worked for FAO in Algeria, the Philippines and Viet Nam. From 1992 to 1998 she was technical officer for the FAO Intercountry Programme for IPM in South and Southeast Asia, based in Viet Nam. In this period over 300 000 farmers participated in over 11 000 Farmer Field Schools that were organized by the Vietnam IPM programme.
    [Show full text]
  • New Technology for Desert Locust Control
    agronomy Article New Technology for Desert Locust Control Graham A. Matthews Faculty of Life Sciences, Imperial College, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK; [email protected] Abstract: Locust outbreaks usually begin in remote unpopulated areas following higher than average rainfall. The need to survey such areas has suggested that unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), often referred to as drones, might be a suitable means of surveying areas with suitable detection devices to survey areas and detect important locust concentrations. This would facilitate determining where sprays need to be applied at this early stage and would minimise the risk of swarms developing and migrating to feed on large areas of crops. Ideally, a drone could also spray groups of hoppers and adults at this stage. To date, tests have shown limitations in their use to apply sprays, although it has been suggested that using a fleet of drones might be possible. The use of biopesticide in these areas has the advantage of being more environmentally acceptable as the spray has no adverse impact on birds. Keywords: locust; drone; unmanned aerial vehicle; early warning; preventive control; biopesticide 1. Introduction Since biblical times, vast numbers of desert locusts (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål, 1775) have periodically increased to such an extent that the plagues cause extensive damage to major crops. Locust upsurges occur infrequently and during a recession period, inter- Citation: Matthews, G.A. New national organisations have not prioritized research, nor have governments in countries Technology for Desert Locust Control. subject to locust plagues maintained in-country research, due to years of under-funding, so Agronomy 2021, 11, 1052.
    [Show full text]