DOCSLIB.ORG

Camel Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camel Risk Assessment Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Camel Camelus dromedarius Gina Paroz First published 2008 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/au/deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Invasive animal risk assessment: Camel Camelus dromedarius 2 Contents Introduction 4 Identity and taxonomy 4 Description 4 Biology 4 Life history 4 Social organisation 5 Diet, thermoregulation and water requirements 5 Preferred habitat 5 Predators and diseases 5 Distribution in Queensland 6 History of introduction 6 Distribution and abundance in Australia 6 Distribution and abundance overseas 8 Management 8 Current and potential impact in Australia 8 Current and potential benefits in Australia 9 Impact overseas 10 Quantitative assessment 12 Introduction 12 Potential distribution 12 Establishment risk 12 Impact and feasibility of control 12 References 12 Appendices 14 Appendix 1. Quantitative risk assessment of pests in Queensland 14 Appendix 2. Potential distribution—CLIMATE parameters 18 Appendix 3. Establishment risk 19 Appendix 4. Impact and feasibility of control 22 Invasive animal risk assessment: Camel Camelus dromedarius 3 Introduction Identity and taxonomy Species: Camelus dromedarius Common names: Camel, dromedary, Arabian camel Family: Camelidae Related species: C. bactrianus (Bactrian camel), Lama glama (llama), L. guanicoe (guanicoe), L. pacos (alpaca) and Vicugna vicugna (vicuña) (Huffman 2004, 2005). Description The key diagnostic features of the camel are body length (300 cm), shoulder height (180–210 cm), tail length (50 cm) and weight (600–1000 kg) (Huffman 2004). Camels have a smooth coat that is beige to light brown, with the undersides slightly lighter. Their legs are long and slender, often with calloused knees, developed from where they touch the ground when the animal is lying down. Though often called the one-humped camel, the dromedary has two humps used for energy storage in the form of fat. The under-developed anterior hump sits over the shoulders and the large rear hump is found in the centre of the back. The upper lip is deeply split and the nostrils can be closed. The camel has long eyelashes to help to keep sand out of its eyes. The two broad toes on the feet are able to spread widely as an adaptation to walking on sand (Huffman 2004). Biology Life history Gestation period: 12–13 months Young per birth: 1 Birth interval: 18–24 months Weaning: 1–2 years Sexual maturity: Females 3–4 years; males 5–6 years Sexual activity: Up to 30 years Lifespan: Up to 50 years (DEH 2004; Huffman 2004). Camel populations have a relatively low maximum rate of increase of around 10% per annum (Edwards et al. 2004) due to a relatively high rate of adult survival and low fecundity. This is typical of large mammals, as is variable juvenile survival (Gaillard et al. 1998). Invasive animal risk assessment: Camel Camelus dromedarius 4 Social organisation Feral camels live in three main types of non-territorial groups: year-round groups of bulls (males), summer groups of cows (females) and calves, and winter breeding groups that include a mature bull and several cows with calves. Old bulls tend to be solitary (DEH 2004). Herds average 11 individuals but larger herds of up to several hundred animals may form in summer or during droughts when groups congregate (DEH 2004; Huffman 2004). In the breeding season, from May to October, single males defend a group of 20 or more cows against advances from other males. Large males engage in ritualised displays that may lead to serious fights. Diet, thermoregulation and water requirements As well as grazing on grass, feral camels browse on vegetation as high as 3.5 m above the ground. They eat a wide range of plant material, including fresh grass and shrubs, preferring roughage to pasture that has introduced grasses or has been fertilised. Camels have a high requirement for salt and they eat salty plants, even devouring thorny, bitter or toxic species that other herbivores avoid. At times when forage is green and moist, feral camels gain all the water they need from their food and do not require drinking water (DEH 2004). Camels are renowned for their ability to survive in hot desert conditions without water for long periods. They have a flexible ‘thermostat’ and will not start sweating until their body temperature reaches 42 oC. Internal body heating mechanisms start when their internal temperature drops below 34 oC. Besides saving energy, this physiological adaptation allows the camel to ‘store’ coolness in preparation for the next day. On hot days, camels will rest together in closely packed groups, which considerably reduces the heat reflecting off of the ground (Huffman 2004). Camels can glean much of their water requirements from desert vegetation and can survive after losing over 40% of their bodyweight in water. If water, whether fresh or brackish, is available in summer, camels will drink regularly and at dawn. In extreme drought camels need access to waterholes, with a dehydrated camel able to drink 200 L in three minutes. The camel’s hump is mostly fat and provides a store of energy rather than water (Huffman 2004). Preferred habitat Feral camels are highly mobile and move over areas up to 5000 km2 (Grigg et al. 1995; Edwards et al. 2001). They wander widely according to conditions, sometimes covering 70 km in a day. In summer, they are usually found in bushland and sandplain country that offers food and shelter from the sun, but in winter they move to salt lakes and salt marshes (DEH 2004). Dörges and Heucke (2003) report that in central Australia, camels feed on more than 80% of the available plant species. Predators and diseases There are no known predators of camels (Huffman 2004). In Australia, it is possible that dingoes or wild dogs take young animals. Camels are susceptible to tuberculosis and brucellosis. Invasive animal risk assessment: Camel Camelus dromedarius 5 Distribution in Queensland History of introduction Camels were first brought into Australia in small numbers in the 1840s (McKnight 1969). Subsequently, demand for draught and transport camels increased and 10 000–20 000 camels were imported to supplement those being bred by the late 1880s. However, as motor transport became more widespread, the camel became redundant and many were released or escaped to form the basis of the today’s feral camel population (Siebert & Newman 1989). Distribution and abundance in Australia Camels now have a wide distribution throughout central Australia and Western Australia, northern South Australia and the Northern Territory (Figure 1). Figure 1. Australian distribution of C. dromedarius (Siebert & Newman 1989). In the 1930s and 1940s, herds of up to 200 camels were seen further to the east of western Queensland (Mitchell et al. 1985). McKnight (1969) reported 15 000 to 20 000 feral camels in Australia, with 1500–2000 in Queensland. Mitchell et al. (1985) reported approximately 1000 camels in the far western districts of Queensland, with seasonal variations in water and food supplies controlling total population size. Camels were reported in the south-west corner of the Diamantina Shire, the north-western corner of the Bulloo Shire, the southern corner of the Winton Shire and around the border of the Boulia and Cloncurry Shires (Mitchell et al. 1985), with populations only occurring on the plains in the far western districts. Figure 2 shows a map of the 1985 and 2000 distribution of camels in Queensland. In 2000, a presence and absence survey was conducted and is overlayed with the 1985 data in Figure 2. At this time, camels were reported in Diamantina, Boulia, Mount Isa, Cloncurry, McKinlay, Richmond and Flinders Shires. The distribution of camels observed in 2000 suggests a range expansion since 1985. However, it is important to note that this information only represents the presence of camels in the shire, and not the distribution within the shire. Invasive animal risk assessment: Camel Camelus dromedarius 6 Figure 2. Queensland distribution of C. dromedarius In 2003, a total of 80 camels were being held in captivity under five declared pest permits in Queensland (Danielle Butcher 2005, pers. comm.). However, this number probably underestimates the number of camels held in Queensland. Edwards et al. (2004) reported a minimum estimate of 80 500 camels in the Northern Territory in 2001, with an overall population throughout Australia of 300 000. They observed a population increase close to the maximum rate of ~10% per year between aerial surveys in 1991 and 2001. This equates to an approximate doubling in population size every eight years (Edwards et al. 2004). Although the population cannot maintain this growth indefinitely, there is no indication that a reduction will occur soon (Edwards et al. 2004). Assuming maximum population growth, McKnight’s (1969) estimate of 4500–6000 camels in the Northern Territory would have increased to 72 000–96 000 camels by 1999. In Queensland, the population estimates of McKnight (1969), Mitchell et al. (1985) and Edwards et al. (2004) were projected to estimate a 2005 Queensland feral camel population of between 24 000 and 32 000. These population estimates are significantly less than the 50 000 camels in Queensland suggested by Warfield and Tume (2000). Invasive animal risk assessment: Camel Camelus dromedarius 7 Distribution and abundance overseas Originally confined to Arabia, the domestic camel now inhabits the deserts of northern and north-eastern Africa, the Middle East and central Asia (Lever 1985).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To Pig out to Pig
    unclean meats. Cornelius was a Gentile. Gentiles were animals were not created for food. like pigs to the Israelites, they were unclean. This How can I pray over a piece of unclean meat and make it Gentile loved the Hebrew God, prayed, and gave clean….its body chemistry did not change. God did not To Pig Out money to the poor. The Father wanted Cornelius to change. He did not make it clean just because I want it. Go know His Son Jesus, and to be filled with the Holy back to Is. 65 & 66 and remember the distaste that God Or Spirit. Therefore the vision: unclean animals which the Creator of all things, has for pig. Do you want to be the Father says; “Get up, Peter. Kill and smoke in the nostrils of God? I truly pray that many of eat.” (vs.10:13) Peters reply? “No Lord?” I have you will not just discard this pamphlet as trash, but will never eaten anything impure or unclean vs. 14. This honestly seek the Father’s Word for your answers, then To Opt Out story takes place years after the death of Jesus. Peter, show Him you love Him by keeping His commandments. by this statement is saying that the Food Laws were It is obedience that shows Him how much you trust Him never changed by Jesus. Then the Father speaks a to be true to His Word. For He alone protects it and will second time, “Do not call anything impure that God cause every Word to come to pass.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CYPRUS QUESTION in the MAKING and the ATTITUDE of the SOVIET UNION TOWARDS the CYPRUS QUESTION (1960-1974) a Master's
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bilkent University Institutional Repository THE CYPRUS QUESTION IN THE MAKING AND THE ATTITUDE OF THE SOVIET UNION TOWARDS THE CYPRUS QUESTION (1960-1974) A Master’s Thesis by MUSTAFA ÇAĞATAY ASLAN DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2008 To my grandfathers Osman OYMAK and Mehmet Akif ASLAN, THE CYPRUS QUESTION IN THE MAKING AND THE ATTITUDE OF THE SOVIET UNION TOWARDS THE CYPRUS QUESTION (1960-1974) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by MUSTAFA ÇAĞATAY ASLAN In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2008 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Associate Prof. Hakan Kırımlı Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Assistant Prof. Dr. Nur Bilge Criss Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Assistant Prof. Dr. Eugenia Kermeli Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT THE CYPRUS QUESTION IN THE MAKING AND THE ATTITUDE OF THE SOVIET UNION TOWARDS THE CYPRUS QUESTION (1960-1974) Aslan, Mustafa Çağatay M.A., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Associate Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Or Bactrian Camel French: German: Wildkamel Spanish: Russian: Dikiy Verblud Chinese
    1 of 4 Proposal I / 7 PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF SPECIES ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: Inclusion of the Wild camel Camelus bactrianus in Appendix I of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals: B. PROPONENT: Mongolia C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxon 1.1. Classis: Mammalia 1.2. Ordo: Tylopoda 1.3. Familia: Camelidae 1.4. Genus: Camelus 1.5. Species: Camelus bactrianus Linnaeus, 1758 1.6. Common names: English: Wild or Bactrian camel French: German: Wildkamel Spanish: Russian: Dikiy verblud Chinese: 2. Biological data 2.1. Distribution Wild populations are restricted to 3 small, remnant populations in China and Mongolia:in the Taklamakan Desert, the deserts around Lop Nur, and the area in and around region A of Mongolia’s Great Gobi Strict Protected Area (Reading et al 2000). In addition, there is a small semi-captive herd of wild camels being maintained and bred outside of the Park. 2.2. Population Surveys over the past several decades have suggested a marked decline in wild bactrian camel numbers and reproductive success rates (Zhirnov and Ilyinsky 1986, Anonymous 1988, Tolgat and Schaller 1992, Tolgat 1995). Researchers suggest that fewer than 500 camels remain in Mongolia and that their population appears to be declining (Xiaoming and Schaller 1996). Globally, scientists have recently suggested that less than 900 individuals survive in small portions of Mongolia and China (Tolgat and Schaller 1992, Hare 1997, Tolgat 1995, Xiaoming and Schaller 1996). However, most of the population estimates from both China and Mongolia were made using methods which preclude rigorous population estimation.
    [Show full text]
  • Camelids: New Players in the International Animal Production Context
    Tropical Animal Health and Production (2020) 52:903–913 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02197-2 REVIEWS Camelids: new players in the international animal production context Mousa Zarrin1 & José L. Riveros2 & Amir Ahmadpour1,3 & André M. de Almeida4 & Gaukhar Konuspayeva5 & Einar Vargas- Bello-Pérez6 & Bernard Faye7 & Lorenzo E. Hernández-Castellano8 Received: 30 October 2019 /Accepted: 22 December 2019 /Published online: 2 January 2020 # Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract The Camelidae family comprises the Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus), the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius), and four species of South American camelids: llama (Lama glama),alpaca(Lama pacos)guanaco(Lama guanicoe), and vicuña (Vicugna vicugna). The main characteristic of these species is their ability to cope with either hard climatic conditions like those found in arid regions (Bactrian and dromedary camels) or high-altitude landscapes like those found in South America (South American camelids). Because of such interesting physiological and adaptive traits, the interest for these animals as livestock species has increased considerably over the last years. In general, the main animal products obtained from these animals are meat, milk, and hair fiber, although they are also used for races and work among other activities. In the near future, climate change will likely decrease agricultural areas for animal production worldwide, particularly in the tropics and subtropics where competition with crops for human consumption is a major problem already. In such conditions, extensive animal production could be limited in some extent to semi-arid rangelands, subjected to periodical draughts and erratic patterns of rainfall, severely affecting conventional livestock production, namely cattle and sheep.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 3 R -Ta.I¡¡V 25 Co ^ by 4^
    C:9 238 Studies on Curing, Aging and_Smoking_of_Camel_Meat. II- Microbiological and Sensory Evaluation. E. T. EL-Asnwah, Salwa B. El-Magoli and M. M. Ibrahim. Dept, of Food. Sci. & Tech. Collage of Agric. Cairo University. Egypt. Introduction: Camel meat is considered as one of the toughest meat in Egypt. If camel meat could ^ plJt zed by aging, smoking and chill storage treatments while conserving other quality ritional attributes, its consumption would increase especially from elder animals. Meat structure can be considered in its simplest form to be a collection of p a rilieljher a ü ’' V^ the myofibrillar structure bound together by a connective tissue network of collQeI iCn » cot The physical properties of the myofibrillar fibers could be affected by (a) aging fit ns myofxhrillarmyofibrillar per se (.uavez(Davez andana Dickson,uicsson, i^/ui1970), , whilew u u e piuuuuxiiijproducing smallomaij. and^insig^^gonu 313fia comitant changes in the connective tissue (Bouton et al., 1973); (b) loss of molS.lit'-*1“ . ^ other changes produced by cooking (Bouton and Harris, 1972) and (c) increased^my contraction which increased muscle fiber diameter (Herring et al., 1967 b). The tissue would be affected by factors including: (a) changes in spatial orientation of collagen fibers in the connective tissue network related to myofibrillar- - - - - - contrac■ — ctr1^ _i ay. #i (Rowe, 1974) and (b) changes in the collagen produced by cooking and related to a . ifl / (Herring et al., 1967 a). Bouton et al., 1975 found that shear force values were n tegt3 _ ced by the muscle fiber properties than b'y the connective tissue properties, A}’ would be influenced by connective tissues as well as by the fiber properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Bactrian Camel, Two-Humped Camel
    Camelus ferus/bactrianus Common name: Bactrian camel, two-humped camel Local name: Havtagai (Mongolian), Wildkamel (German), Jya nishpa yapung (Ladakhi) Classification: Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Artiodactyla Family: Camelidae Genus: Camelus Species: ferus/bactrianus Profile: The scientific name of the wild Bactrian camel is Camelus ferus, while the domesticated form is called Camelus bactrianus. The distinctive feature of the animal is that it is two-humped whereas the Dromedary camel has a single hump. DNA tests have revealed that there are two or three distinct genetic differences and about 3% base difference between the wild and domestic populations of Bactrian camels. They also differ physically. The wild Bactrian camel is smaller and slender than the domestic breed. The wild camels have a sandy gray- brown coat while the domestic ones have a dark brown coat. The predominant difference between them however is the shape of the humps. While that of the wild camel are small and pyramid-like, those of the domestic ones are large and irregular. The face of a Bactrian camel is long and triangular with a split upper lip. The Bactrian camel is highly adapted to surviving the cold desert climate. Each foot has an undivided sole with two large toes that can spread wide apart for walking on sand. The ears and nose are lined with hair to protect against sand and the muscular nostrils can be closed during sandstorms. The eyes are protected from sand and debris by a double layer of long eyelashes while bushy eyebrows give protection from the sun. It grows a thick shaggy coat during winter, which is shed very rapidly in spring to give the animal a shorn look.
    [Show full text]
  • Locusts in Queensland
    LOCUSTS Locusts in Queensland PEST STATUS REVIEW SERIES – LAND PROTECTION by C.S. Walton L. Hardwick J. Hanson Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the many people who provided information for this assessment. Clyde McGaw, Kevin Strong and David Hunter, from the Australian Plague Locust Commission, are also thanked for the editorial review of drafts of the document. Cover design: Sonia Jordan Photographic credits: Natural Resources and Mines staff ISBN 0 7345 2453 6 QNRM03033 Published by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld. February 2003 Information in this document may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Land Protection Department of Natural Resources and Mines GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Q 4000 #16401 02/03 Contents 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Taxonomy.................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 History ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Outbreaks across Australia ........................................................................................ 3 3.2 Outbreaks in Queensland........................................................................................... 3 4.0 Current and predicted distribution ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Caseins from Mongolian Yak, Khainak, and Bactrian Camel B Ochirkhuyag, Jm Chobert, M Dalgalarrondo, Y Choiset, T Haertlé
    Characterization of caseins from Mongolian yak, khainak, and bactrian camel B Ochirkhuyag, Jm Chobert, M Dalgalarrondo, Y Choiset, T Haertlé To cite this version: B Ochirkhuyag, Jm Chobert, M Dalgalarrondo, Y Choiset, T Haertlé. Characterization of caseins from Mongolian yak, khainak, and bactrian camel. Le Lait, INRA Editions, 1997, 77 (5), pp.601-613. hal-00929550 HAL Id: hal-00929550 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00929550 Submitted on 1 Jan 1997 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Lait (1997) 77, 601-613 601 © Eisevier/Inra Original article Characterization of caseins from Mongolian yak, khainak, and bactrian cam el B Ochirkhuyag 2, lM Chobert 1*, M Dalgalarrondo 1, Y Choiset 1, T Haertlé ' 1 Laboratoire d'étude des interactions des molécules alimentaires, Inra, rue de la Géraudière, BP 71627, 44316 Nantes cedex 03, France; 2 Institute of Chemistry, Academy of Sciences, Vlan Bator, Mongolia (Received 25 November 1996; accepted 5 May 1997) Summary - The composition of acid-precipitated caseins from ruminant Mongolian domestic ani- maIs was analyzed and a comparative study between camel (Camelus bactrianus) and dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) was realized. Acid-precipitated whole caseins were analyzed for ami no acid composition, separated by anion exchange chromatography and identified by alkaline urea-PAGE.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Turkish Indigenous Donkey Populations Determined by Mitochondrial DNA D-Loop Region
    animals Article Phylogenetic Relationships of Turkish Indigenous Donkey Populations Determined by Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Region Emel Özkan Ünal 1,* , Fulya Özdil 2,* , Selçuk Kaplan 3, Eser Kemal Gürcan 1, Serdar Genç 4 , Sezen Arat 2 and Mehmet Ihsan˙ Soysal 1 1 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Tekirda˘gNamık Kemal University, Tekirda˘g59030, Turkey; [email protected] (E.K.G.); [email protected] (M.I.S.)˙ 2 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Tekirda˘gNamık Kemal University, Tekirda˘g59030, Turkey; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tekirda˘gNamık Kemal University, Tekirda˘g59030, Turkey; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Kır¸sehirAhi Evran University, Kır¸sehir40100, Turkey; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.Ö.Ü.); [email protected] (F.Ö.); Tel.: +90-282-250-2185 (E.Ö.Ü.); +90-282-250-2233 (F.Ö.) Received: 25 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 27 October 2020 Simple Summary: This paper represents the first fundamental report of mtDNA diversity in Turkish indigenous donkey breeds and presents findings for the origin and genetic characterization of donkey populations dispersed in seven geographical regions in Turkey, and thus reveals insights into their genetic history. The median-joining network and phylogenetic tree exhibit two different maternal lineages of the 16 Turkish indigenous donkey populations. Abstract: In this study, to analyze the mtDNA D-loop region and the origin of the maternal lineages of 16 different donkey populations, and to assess the domestication of Turkish indigenous donkeys in seven geographical regions, we investigated the DNA sequences of the D-loop region of 315 indigenous donkeys from Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Level of Estradiol 17-Β Serum and Ovarian Folliculare Dynamics in Short Estrous Cycle of Bali Cattle
    LEVEL OF ESTRADIOL 17-β SERUM AND OVARIAN FOLLICULARE DYNAMICS IN SHORT ESTROUS CYCLE OF BALI CATTLE C.M Airin1, P. P. Putro2, P. Astuti3 and E. Baliarti4 1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Jl Fauna No. 2 Karangmalang Yogyakarta - Indonesia 2Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Jl Fauna No 2 Karangmalang Yogyakarta - Indonesia 3Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Jl Fauna No 2 Karangmalang Yogyakarta - Indonesia, 4Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Gadjah Mada University,Jl Fauna No 2 Karangmalang Yogyakarta - Indonesia Corresponding E-mail : [email protected] Received December 27, 2013; Accepted February 10, 2014 ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kadar estradiol 17-β dan gambaran dinamika folikel yang menyertai kejadian siklus estrus yang pendek Penelitian ini menggunakan 7 ekor sapi Bali yang ada di Kebun Pengembangan Penelitian Pertanian, dan Peternakan (KP4), betina, umur 2 tahun, sehat dan bersiklus estrus normal. Pengukuran diameter folikel menggunakan ultrasonografi (USG) dan darah diambil dari vena jugularus dimulai hari pertama setiap hari dalam waktu yang bersamaan selama 3 siklus. Kadar estradiol 17-β dianalisis menggunakan metode Enzyme Immuno Assay (EIA) Hasil penelitian menunjukkan 4 ekor sapi Bali mempunyai siklus estrus pendek (n=7) diantara siklus estrus normal. Sapi Bali tersebut mempunyai 1 gelombang perkembangan folikel dengan panjang siklus 7-10 hari, diameter folikel ovulasi maksimal dan kadar estradiol 17-β menyerupai siklus normal. Kadar tertinggi estradiol 17-β pada siklus tersebut 107,77 ± 55.94 pg/ml pada hari ke 7-10 saat ukuran folikel ovulasi mencapai 10.5 ± 0,38 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Impact of Desert Locust to Nutrition Security in SOMALIA
    POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DESERT LOCUST Emma Apo Ouma TO NUTRITION SECURITY IN SOMALIA WHAT IS THE CURRENT SITUATION? •Triple threat of Desert Locust, Gu flooding and COVID-19, •April and June 2020, an estimated 2.7 million people across Somalia are expected to face Crisis and deteriorate to 3.5 million between July and September 2020 WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR NUTRITION SECURITY? CROP AND PASTURE DAMAGE Threat to current Gu season crop production and may also threaten pasture availability and crop cultivation across Somalia through the following 2020 Deyr (October-December A swarm can eat enough food in one day to feed 34 million people. FALLING LIVESTOCK PRICES •Livestock diseases •Poor livestock nutrition; increased price of livestock feed •Reduced quality of livestock products eg milk, meat LOSS OF LIVELIHOODS •Disruption of food systems; critical value chains have been affected e.g. livestock, cereals such as sorghum, maize •Loss of wage and employment opportunities e.g. labor in the fields, value chain actors •Increase in livelihood based coping strategy: eg selling last breeding animal, spent savings, begging, reduced expenditure on livestock and agriculture •Reduced spending on non-food needs health care, education FOOD CONSUMPTION AND DIETARY DIVERSITY •With poor harvests, there is likelihood of poor food consumption at hhd level •Depletion of food stocks •Food Prices have increased •A majority if households rely on markets for food: increased reliance on purchased and processed foods •Compromise the nutrition of the most vulnerable: children less than 5, PLW, elderly, adolesents •Increased rates of acute malnutrition ONGOING EFFORTS Household Level Screening and referral of acute malnutrition cases Targeting of the most vulnerable (UCT) Community level ▪Burying locusts, setting fires, and making noise to scare them off.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando
    Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando To cite this version: Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando. Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, Annual Reviews, 2021, 9 (1), 10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023118. hal- 03030307 HAL Id: hal-03030307 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03030307 Submitted on 30 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2021. 9:X–X https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023118 Copyright © 2021 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved Librado Orlando www.annualreviews.org Equid Genomics and Evolution Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado and Ludovic Orlando Laboratoire d’Anthropobiologie Moléculaire et d’Imagerie de Synthèse, CNRS UMR 5288, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 31000, France; email: [email protected] Keywords equid, horse, evolution, donkey, ancient DNA, population genomics Abstract The equid family contains only one single extant genus, Equus, including seven living species grouped into horses on the one hand and zebras and asses on the other. In contrast, the equine fossil record shows that an extraordinarily richer diversity existed in the past and provides multiple examples of a highly dynamic evolution punctuated by several waves of explosive radiations and extinctions, cross-continental migrations, and local adaptations.
    [Show full text]