DOCSLIB.ORG

Plague Locusts, Wingless Grasshoppers and Livestock Residues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plague Locusts, Wingless Grasshoppers and Livestock Residues Plague locusts, wingless grasshoppers and livestock residues Photo courtesy APLC Australian plague locust swarm over cereal crop Locust numbers can periodically The most effective means of controlling build up and pose a significant threat these pests is to spray the nymph to grain, horticultural crops and stages, either by air or ground rig, with pastures. Wingless and small plague an appropriate insecticide. However, grasshoppers can also cause crop and the chemicals used have the potential pasture damage in some areas. to cause residues in grazing livestock – residues that can cause problems for Locusts can migrate hundreds of our export industry. kilometres. Depending on the nature and scale of locust activity, individual Control authorities use licensed ground landholders, state and territory and aerial operators to mix and apply government authorities and the control chemicals. Landholders must Australian Plague Locust Commission apply the same level of professional care. (APLC) may all be engaged in the control of locusts. Plague locusts, wingless grasshoppers and livestock residues National Vendor Declaration How do livestock become contaminated? It is essential that the National Vendor Declaration (NVD) is completed correctly, Livestock can be exposed to plague locust including the relevant question which relates and wingless grasshopper control to withholding periods (WHP) for fodder. chemicals by: The WHP question for fodder within the • direct over-spraying of livestock respective NVDs can be found as follows; • grazing of pastures or crops that have for Cattle – Question 7, Sheep and Lambs – been sprayed Question 5, Goats – Question 4, Bobby Calves – Question 3 and EU Cattle – • feeding fodder (hay, grain) that has been Question 6. The NVD is underpinned by state sprayed and territory legislation. Penalties exist for • grazing or feeding on crops or produce providing false or misleading information. affected by off-target movement of Producers who have observed export chemicals. intervals are encouraged to make a statement to this effect, in answer to the Additional What you should do Information section of the declaration. It is essential that producers obtain WHP intervals for a chemical product can information about the chemicals which may be found on the approved label. Producers be applied to control locusts, regardless of who require additional information about whether they are controlling the locusts WHPs should contact their local Department themselves or control is being undertaken of Agriculture/Primary Industries. by an outside authority. A threat to our export markets In 2013-14, Australia exported 1.29 million tonnes swt of beef, worth $7.79 billion, 237,000 tonnes swt of lamb, worth $1.7 billion and 186,000 tonnes swt of mutton, worth $870 million. To retain consumer confidence and to protect existing trade to export markets, Australia must guarantee the integrity of its products and their freedom from unacceptable chemical residues. Photo courtesy APLC Adult Australian plague locust Key points Chemicals registered to control locusts and/or • Find out when spraying is likely to occur in your area. wingless grasshoppers • Check what chemicals the control Chemicals registered for the control of authorities are using and observe locusts and/or wingless grasshoppers relevant Export Intervals (EI) (see tables). contain different active ingredients and are marketed under a range of brand names. • To prevent unacceptable residues in It is important for landholders and livestock at the time of sale, determine contractors applying insecticides to read what chemicals are best suited to your the product label, confirm that the product enterprise when undertaking your own is registered for the intended purpose and control spraying. to identify the active ingredient in the • Read and follow the label directions or product that is to be used. Use this permit conditions. Always: information and the tables of EIs (Export – use only in the situations or crops listed Intervals)to check that use of the chemical on the label or permit is appropriate for your enterprise. – use the correct treatment rate; – observe the harvest and grazing Chemicals applied to neighbouring land withholding periods (WHP) or Determine the active ingredient in any alternative export intervals set out in sprays applied on or adjacent to your land the product label or Australian by control authorities or neighbours. Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Assess the likelihood of spray drift onto Authority (APVMA) permit (see details your pastures or feed crops. If they have with the tables for further information been exposed to drift then manage them on meeting export market requirements). as if they have been treated intentionally. • Confirm that all relevant Export Intervals Organophosphate and carbamate (EIs) have been met before selling stock insecticides – use chemicals from these for slaughter – especially if meat or other groups wherever possible as they break products may be destined for an down relatively quickly. Active ingredients overseas market (see the tables). in these groups include fenitrothion, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, maldison (malathion) • Keep records of any spraying activity. and carbaryl. Fenitrothion and maldison • Consult with neighbours about spraying pose the least risk of producing (both yours and theirs) – particularly near unacceptable residues in livestock, property boundaries. provided the required EI is observed. • Fill in the National Vendor Declaration Fipronil is also registered for Australian (NVD) correctly. Penalties apply for plague locust, migratory locust, spur providing false or misleading information throated locust and wingless grasshopper on the NVD. control. It persists on pasture and in animals for longer than fenitrothion but is • If unsure, seek further advice from applied at very low rates. A very small chemical manufacturers, chemical volume is required to make up a spray. suppliers and state or territory departments of agriculture, primary industries. Errors in mixing or application rates Label withholding periods could cause residues in livestock even if and recommended the recommended EI is observed. Carefully read the label directions for export intervals: use before mixing or applying any agricultural chemical product. Harvesting of treated crops, including animal feeds: Although fipronil is registered for use in • Observe the label WHP for all treated some of our major export markets, crops and pasture, including those that residues in meat could put at risk the may have been subjected to spray drift. export meat trade due to differences in importing countries’ residue standards. • If crop or pasture is to be cut for stockfeed, observe the Export Animal Synthetic pyrethroid insecticides Feed Interval (EAFI) recommended in the Alpha-cypermethrin is registered for control tables or, alternatively, do not sell stock of wingless grasshoppers in pasture that have been fed cut material for situations. Alpha-cypermethrin can persist export slaughter until the relevant ESI on pastures for relatively long periods. has been observed. Observe the appropriate Export Interval for livestock exposed to feeds treated with Grazing treated areas (livestock for this chemical. domestic consumption only): • Observe the grazing WHP or withhold Other chemicals from slaughter period that is specified The APVMA may consider industry on the registered product label. requests for permits for the off-label use of other insecticides if there are no registered • Where possible avoid spraying areas in alternatives available. Any permits will which livestock are grazing. include appropriate WHP directions and • If overspraying of livestock grazing trade risk management advice. pasture is unavoidable, withhold them from slaughter until either the EGI indicated in the tables is met or they are moved to clean feed and the ESI is met. Grazing (livestock for export markets): • The label WHP for grazing applies to stock slaughtered for the domestic market. Some export markets apply different standards including a nil tolerance for some chemicals. To meet these standards check that Export Intervals (EIs) are available before selecting or applying chemicals and ensure that one or other of the EIs shown in the tables is observed before stock are sold or slaughtered. Photo courtesy APLC Adult plague locust swarm Recommended export intervals (EI) for organophosphate or carbamate products registered for locust and/or wingless grasshopper control are: Chemical Export Animal Feed Export Slaughter Export Grazing Interval EAFI(1) Interval ESI(2) Interval EGI(3) Fenitrothion 14 days EGI applies 14 days Chlorpyrifos (EC) Not required 56 days 56 days Diazinon 14 days 14 days 28 days Carbaryl 7 days EGI applies 7 days Maldison Label or APVMA Label or APVMA Label or APVMA Permit WHP applies Permit WHP applies Permit WHP applies 1 day 1 day 1 day Recommended export intervals (EI) for fipronil products registered for locust and/or wingless grasshopper control are (1.25 grams active ingredient per hectare): Chemical Export Animal Feed Export Slaughter Export Grazing Interval Interval Interval Fipronil ULV 14 days 14 days 21 days Fipronil – 200 SC 14 days 14 days 21 days Recommended export intervals for alpha-cypermethrin products registered only for wingless grasshopper control are: Chemical Export Animal Feed Export Slaughter Export Grazing Interval Interval Interval Alpha-cypermethrin No data available 42 days 56 days Recommended export
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Locusts in Queensland
    LOCUSTS Locusts in Queensland PEST STATUS REVIEW SERIES – LAND PROTECTION by C.S. Walton L. Hardwick J. Hanson Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the many people who provided information for this assessment. Clyde McGaw, Kevin Strong and David Hunter, from the Australian Plague Locust Commission, are also thanked for the editorial review of drafts of the document. Cover design: Sonia Jordan Photographic credits: Natural Resources and Mines staff ISBN 0 7345 2453 6 QNRM03033 Published by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld. February 2003 Information in this document may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Land Protection Department of Natural Resources and Mines GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Q 4000 #16401 02/03 Contents 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Taxonomy.................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 History ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Outbreaks across Australia ........................................................................................ 3 3.2 Outbreaks in Queensland........................................................................................... 3 4.0 Current and predicted distribution ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Impact of Desert Locust to Nutrition Security in SOMALIA
    POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DESERT LOCUST Emma Apo Ouma TO NUTRITION SECURITY IN SOMALIA WHAT IS THE CURRENT SITUATION? •Triple threat of Desert Locust, Gu flooding and COVID-19, •April and June 2020, an estimated 2.7 million people across Somalia are expected to face Crisis and deteriorate to 3.5 million between July and September 2020 WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR NUTRITION SECURITY? CROP AND PASTURE DAMAGE Threat to current Gu season crop production and may also threaten pasture availability and crop cultivation across Somalia through the following 2020 Deyr (October-December A swarm can eat enough food in one day to feed 34 million people. FALLING LIVESTOCK PRICES •Livestock diseases •Poor livestock nutrition; increased price of livestock feed •Reduced quality of livestock products eg milk, meat LOSS OF LIVELIHOODS •Disruption of food systems; critical value chains have been affected e.g. livestock, cereals such as sorghum, maize •Loss of wage and employment opportunities e.g. labor in the fields, value chain actors •Increase in livelihood based coping strategy: eg selling last breeding animal, spent savings, begging, reduced expenditure on livestock and agriculture •Reduced spending on non-food needs health care, education FOOD CONSUMPTION AND DIETARY DIVERSITY •With poor harvests, there is likelihood of poor food consumption at hhd level •Depletion of food stocks •Food Prices have increased •A majority if households rely on markets for food: increased reliance on purchased and processed foods •Compromise the nutrition of the most vulnerable: children less than 5, PLW, elderly, adolesents •Increased rates of acute malnutrition ONGOING EFFORTS Household Level Screening and referral of acute malnutrition cases Targeting of the most vulnerable (UCT) Community level ▪Burying locusts, setting fires, and making noise to scare them off.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for POP Pesticides
    Guidance for POP pesticides 1. Background on POP pesticides POPs Pesticides originate almost entirely from anthropogenic sources and are associated largely with the manufacture, use and disposition of certain organic chemicals. Of the initial 12 POPs chemicals, eight are POPs pesticide. In the new POP list, five chemicals may be categorised as pesticides. These are alpha hexachlorocyclohexane (alpha-HCH), beta hexachlorocyclohexane (beta-HCH), Chlordecone, Lindane (gamma, 1,2,3,4,5,6- hexaclorocyclohexane) and Pentachlorobenzene. This module addresses baseline data gathering and assessment of POPs pesticides. Particular care is required to address DDT due to its use for vector control and Lindane due to its use for control of ecto-parasites in veterinary and human application, which may be under the responsibility of authorities other than those responsible for primarily agricultural chemicals. In addition, it is important that all uses of HCB, alpha hexachorocyclohexane, beta hexachlorocyclohexane and pentachlorobenzene (industrial as well as pesticide) be properly addressed. Specialists with knowledge of each of these areas might be included in the task teams. 2. Objective To review and summarize the production, use, import and export of the chemicals listed in Annex A and Annex B of the Convention (excluding other chemicals listed under Annex A and B which are not considered as pesticides). To gather information on stockpiles and wastes containing, or thought to contain, POPs pesticides. To assess the legal and institutional framework for control of the production, use, import, export and disposal of the chemicals listed in Annex A and Annex B (excluding other chemicals which are not classed as pesticides) of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodical Cicadas SP 341 3/21 21-0190 Programs in Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4-H Youth Development, Family and Consumer Sciences, and Resource Development
    SP 341 Periodical Cicadas Frank A. Hale, Professor Originally developed by Harry Williams, former Professor Emeritus and Jaime Yanes Jr., former Assistant Professor Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology The periodical cicada, Magicicada species, has the broods have been described by scientists and are longest developmental period of any insect in North designated by Roman numerals. There are three 13-year America. There is probably no insect that attracts as cicada broods (XIX, XXII and XXIII) and 12 17-year much attention in eastern North America as does the cicada broods (I-X, XIII, and XIV). Also, there are three periodical cicada. Their sudden springtime emergence, distinct species of 17-year cicadas (M. septendecim, filling the air with their high-pitched, shrill-sounding M. cassini, and M. septendecula) and three species of songs, excites much curiosity. 13-year cicadas (M. tredecim, M. tredecassini, and M. tredecula). Two races of the periodical cicada exist. One race has a life cycle of 13 years and is common in the southeastern In Tennessee, Brood XIX of the 13-year cicada had a United States. The other race has a life cycle of 17 years spectacular emergence in 2011 (Map 1). In 2004 and and is generally more northern in distribution. Due 2021, Brood X of the 17-year cicada primarily emerged to Tennessee’s location, both the 13-year and 17-year in East Tennessee (Map 2). Brood X has the largest cicadas occur in the state. emergence of individuals for the 17-year cicada in the United States. Brood XXIII of the 13-year cicada last Although periodical cicadas have a 13- or 17-year cycle, emerged in West Tennessee in 2015 (Map 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshoppered: America's Response to the 1874
    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: Grasshoppered: America’s Response to the 1874 Rocky Mountain Locust Invasion Full Citation: Alexandra M Wagner, “Grasshoppered: America’s Response to the 1874 Rocky Mountain Locust Invasion,” Nebraska History 89 (2008): 154-167 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH2008Grasshoppered.pdf Date: 2/11/2014 Article Summary: It was a plague of biblical proportions, influencing generations of federal agricultural policy . and foreshadowing today’s expectations about the government’s role during natural disasters. Cataloging Information: Names: Swain Finch, Solomon Butcher, H Westermann, Robert W Furnas, Thomas A Osborn, E O C Ord, N A M Dudley, Jeffrey Lockwood, John S Pillsbury, John L Pennington Keywords: Swain Finch, H Westermann, Robert W Furnas, Thomas A Osborn, Rocky Mountain locust (Melanoplus spretus), Nebraska Relief and Aid Association,
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshoppers
    Grasshoppers Orthoptera: Acrididae Plains Lubber Pictured grasshoppers Great crested grasshopper Snakeweed grasshoppers Primary Pest Grasshoppers • Migratory grasshopper • Twostriped grasshopper • Differential grasshopper • Redlegged grasshopper • Clearwinged grasshopper Twostriped Grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus Redlegged Grasshopper, Melanoplus femurrubrum Differential Grasshopper, Melanoplus differentialis Migratory Grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes Clearwinged Grasshopper Camnula pellucida Diagram courtesy of Alexandre Latchininsky, University of Wyoming Photograph courtesy of Jean-Francoise Duranton, CIRAD Grasshoppers lay pods of eggs below ground Grasshopper Egg Pods Molting is not for wimps! Grasshopper Nymphs Some grasshoppers found in winter and early spring Velvet-striped grasshopper – a common spring species Grasshopper Controls • Weather (rainfall mediated primarily) • Natural enemies – Predators, diseases • Treatment of breeding areas • Biological controls • Row covers Temperature and rainfall are important mortality factors Grasshoppers and Rainfall Moisture prior to egg hatch generally aids survival – Newly hatched young need succulent foliage Moisture after egg hatch generally reduces problems – Assists spread of diseases – Allows for plenty of food, reducing competition for rangeland and crops Grasshopper predators Robber Flies Larvae of many blister beetles develop on grasshopper egg pods Blister beetle larva Fungus-killed Grasshoppers Pathogen: Entomophthora grylli Mermis nigrescens, a nematode parasite of grasshoppers
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Biopesticides in Desert Locust Management
    THE FUTURE OF BIOPESTICIDES IN DESERT LOCUST MANAGEMENT REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP HELD IN SALY, SENEGAL 12-15 FEBRUARY 2007 i The workshop was organized with support from: International Fund for Agricultural Development International Organization of the Francophonie World Bank Rapporteur: Joyce Magor FAO/AGPP Documents: The workshop documents are available on CD. The CD’s as well as hardcopies of the report can de obtained from FAO/AGPP Please send your requests to: James Everts FAO/AGPP. Via delle terme di Carracalla 00150 Rome, Italy e-mail: [email protected] tel: +39 5705 3477 Correspondence on the workshop and the report should be directed at James Everts The opinions expressed in this document represent those of the participants of the Workshop and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the FAO, the Worldbank, OIF, IFAD or the Government of Senegal. ii The Future of Biopesticides Acronyms and abbreviations AGRHYMET Centre de formation et d'information en agro-hydro-météorologie Centre for Training and information on Agrometeorology and Hydrology APLC Australian Plague Locust Commission BCP Biological Control Products SA (Pty) Ltd CABI CAB International CERES-Locustox Centre for Ecotoxicological Research in the Sahel CFA Coopération financière d'Afrique CILSS Comité permanent Inter-états de Lutte contre la Sécheresse dans le Sahel Permanent Interstate Committee for Drought Control in the Sahel CLCPRO Commission de lutte contre le Criquet Pèlerin dans la Région Occidentale Commission for controlling the Desert
    [Show full text]
  • ENTOMOPHAGY OUTLINE I. What Is It (SLIDE 2) II. Brief History Of
    ENTOMOPHAGY OUTLINE I. What is it (SLIDE 2) II. Brief History of Entomophagy (SLIDE 3) a. In the Middle East, as far back as the 8th century BC, servants were thought to have carried locusts arranged on sticks to royal banquets in the palace of Asurbanipal (Ninivé). b. The first reference to entomophagy in Europe was in Greece (SLIDE 4), where eating cicadas was considered a delicacy. Literature from ancient China also cites the practice of entomophagy. Li Shizhen’s Compendium of Materia Medica, one of the largest and most comprehensive books on Chinese medicine during the Ming Dynasty in China (1368– 1644), displays an impressive record of all foods, including a large number of insects. The compendium also highlights the medicinal benefits of the insects. c. The practice of eating insects (SLIDE 5) is cited throughout religious literature in the Christian, Jewish and Islamic faiths. d. The Bible speaks of locusts as food in the book of Leviticus, most probably in reference to the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. (SLIDE 6) Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth (Leviticus 11: 21) 1 Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind (Leviticus 11: 22) e. (SLIDE 7) There are 8 species of flying insects permitted to be eaten in the Torah … 2 grasshoppers, 2 crickets, and 4 locust.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment of the Sudan
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SUDAN LOCUST CONTROL PROJECT 650 - 0087 United States Agency for International Development Mission to Sudan Khartoum, Sudan August, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBR3EVIATIONS SECTION 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Purpose of Assessment 2.1 AID Environmental Procedures 2.2 Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Locust Control 2.3 Environmental and Pesticide Legislation/Sudan 3.0 Scoping Procedure 4.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives 4.1 Elack.ground 4.2 Project Goals, Purpose and Output 4.3 Other Donor Activities 4.4 Analysis of Alternatives 4.4.1 Economical 4.4.2 Political 4.4.3 Environmental 5.0 Environment to be Affected by Action 5.1 Human Population 5.2 Farks. Reserves and Sanctuaries 5.3 Rare, Endangered and Migratory Species 5.4 Agricultural Resources 5.4.1 Mechanized Rainfed Sector 5.4.2 Rainfed Traditional Sector 5.4.3 Pastoralists 6.0 Environmental Assessment of Action 6.1 Selection of Insecticides for Locust/Grasshopper Control 6.1.1 USEPA Registration Status of Selected Insecticides and Recommendations of the L/G PEA 6.1.2 Field Testing of Selected Insecticides 6.1.3 Selection of Pesticides for Sudan Program 2 6.3 Application Methods and Equipment 6.3.1 Aerial 6.3.2 Ground C.14 Acute and Long Term Environmental Tox.icological Hazards 6.5 Efficacy of Selected Insecticides for L/G Control 6.6 Effect of Selected Insecticides on Non- Target Organisms and the Natural Environm 6.7 Conditions Under Which Insecticides are to Used 6.8 Availability and Effectiveness
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing and Eliminating the Use of Persistent Organic Pesticides
    Reducing and Eliminating the use of Persistent Organic Pesticides Guidance on alternative strategies for sustainable pest and vector management Johan Mörner, Robert Bos and Marjon Fredrix Geneva, 2002 1 Alternatives to POPs pesticides - a guidance document About the authors Johan Mörner (M.Sc. Agronomy of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) has 15 years of experience working with pest management research in Sweden and eight years managing projects on IPM, pesticide safety and alternative control methods in East and southern Africa. He currently works as a consultant on pest and pesticide management issues both in Sweden and abroad. Robert Bos (M.Sc. Medical Biology/M.Sc. Immunology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands) joined the World Health Organization in 1981 on assignment in Costa Rica before transferring to the Secretariat of the WHO/FAO/UNEP Panel of Experts on Environmental Management for Vector Control (PEEM) at WHO head- quarters. In his current position of scientist in the Water, Sanitation and Health Unit of WHO he combines responsibilities for PEEM work and for the broader health agenda associated with water resources development and management. Marjon Fredrix (M.Sc. in Tropical Agronomy, Wageningen University, the Nether- lands) presently works for the Global IPM Facility at FAO in Rome. Between 1987 and 1998 she worked for FAO in Algeria, the Philippines and Viet Nam. From 1992 to 1998 she was technical officer for the FAO Intercountry Programme for IPM in South and Southeast Asia, based in Viet Nam. In this period over 300 000 farmers participated in over 11 000 Farmer Field Schools that were organized by the Vietnam IPM programme.
    [Show full text]
  • New Technology for Desert Locust Control
    agronomy Article New Technology for Desert Locust Control Graham A. Matthews Faculty of Life Sciences, Imperial College, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK; [email protected] Abstract: Locust outbreaks usually begin in remote unpopulated areas following higher than average rainfall. The need to survey such areas has suggested that unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), often referred to as drones, might be a suitable means of surveying areas with suitable detection devices to survey areas and detect important locust concentrations. This would facilitate determining where sprays need to be applied at this early stage and would minimise the risk of swarms developing and migrating to feed on large areas of crops. Ideally, a drone could also spray groups of hoppers and adults at this stage. To date, tests have shown limitations in their use to apply sprays, although it has been suggested that using a fleet of drones might be possible. The use of biopesticide in these areas has the advantage of being more environmentally acceptable as the spray has no adverse impact on birds. Keywords: locust; drone; unmanned aerial vehicle; early warning; preventive control; biopesticide 1. Introduction Since biblical times, vast numbers of desert locusts (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål, 1775) have periodically increased to such an extent that the plagues cause extensive damage to major crops. Locust upsurges occur infrequently and during a recession period, inter- Citation: Matthews, G.A. New national organisations have not prioritized research, nor have governments in countries Technology for Desert Locust Control. subject to locust plagues maintained in-country research, due to years of under-funding, so Agronomy 2021, 11, 1052.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Desert Locust Breeding Areas by Means of Earth Observation in Mauritania
    PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO EN FISICA TESIS DOCTORAL: Identifying Desert locust breeding areas by means of Earth Observation in Mauritania Presentada por Diego Gómez Aragón para optar al grado de Doctor por la Universidad de Valladolid Dirigida por: Dra. Julia Sanz Justo Dr. Pablo Salvador González Dr. Carlos Casanova Mateo Valladolid, 2019 Identifying desert locust breeding areas by means of Earth Observation in Mauritania Doctorate programme on Applied Physics “Earth observation, environmental modelling and remote sensing” Diego Gómez Aragón PhD Advisor: Dr. Jose Luis Casanova (UVA, Spain) PhD Director/s: Dra. Julia Sanz Justo, Dr. Pablo Salvador and Dr. Carlos Casanova Mateo (UVA, Spain) “Nothing would be done at all if a man waited till he could do it so well that no one could find fault with it” J. H. Newman Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to show my sincere gratitude to José Luis Casanova to trust on me and provide a great support during my PhD. Without his recommendations, advices and knowledge, this thesis would not have been possible. I would also like to thank my PhD directors Julia Sanz, Pablo Salvador and Carlos Casanova for their continuous support during this time, for their patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. Their guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. I could not have imagined having better advisors and mentors for my PhD study. I would like to thank to the rest of my fellow lab-mates at LATUV (Miguel and Dani) their support, the stimulating discussions about programming, encouragement and good advices during my research, what has permitted to enrich this work from various perspectives.
    [Show full text]