DOCSLIB.ORG

373 Petre M. Petrov Automatic for the Masses Examines the Theoretical

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
373 Petre M. Petrov Automatic for the Masses Examines the Theoretical Book Reviews 373 Petre M. Petrov Automatic for the Masses: The Death of the Author and the Birth of Socialist Realism, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015), 328 pp., $56.25 (hb), isbn 9781442648425. Automatic for the Masses examines the theoretical-philosophical trope of the death of the author as early Soviet literary and artistic theories and Stalinist culture articulated it. Part One analyzes how practitioners of five theoretical and artistic platforms of the first post-revolutionary decade enacted the death of the author and theorized the effects of the author’s demise on the status of art and the subject. Among the theoretical positions of the 1920s Petrov chooses for his argument Russian Formalism, the sociological method of Vale- rian Pereverzev, the science of tektology by Aleksandr Bogdanov, Constructiv- ism, and the Onguardist movement. Part Two analyzes Stalinism as a mode of representation where “the desire implicit in the symbolic death of the author that modernist culture enacted”—the desire to belong to a supra-individual entity—has been “fulfilled” (p. 30). An important point of departure for Petrov’s monograph is Astradur Eysteinsson’s claim that artistic modernism combines practices celebrating the individual self with those suppressing subjectivity. For Petrov these two features of modernist art are not mutually exclusive; rather, they both are aesthetic and philosophical reactions to modernity. Petrov is also in dialogue with Boris Groys’s The Total Art of Stalinism, which places the cultural gestures celebrating the artistic self in Russian avant-garde and Stalinism within a mod- ernist framework. In his turn, Petrov examines the cultural gestures of deper- sonalization and claims that both modernism and socialist realism “feature symbolic rituals in which artistic practice is presented as driven by impera- tive objectivity” (p. 31). Specifically, he argues that every discursive formation employs the act of creation and the place of the author in such an act. From this point of view, Petrov’s study is a metahistory of the death of the author, a study of “figures of thought” (p. 45) of Russian modernism of the 1920s and socialist realism. He does not discuss modernist and Stalinist culture’s claims about the world, instead focusing on early Soviet modernist and Stalinist cultures’ claims about “the status of knowledge and genesis of consciousness” under Soviet modernity (p. 32). Petrov opens his gallery of aesthetic and theoretical platforms of the 1920s with the story of Russian Formalists’ quest for supra-personal agency that would bring the sum of the elements into a textual whole. For the Formalists, Petrov contends, the discussion of the literary device and the dominanta as the © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2016 | doi 10.1163/18763324-00001253Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 01:26:52AM via free access <UN> 374 Book Reviews constructive forces beyond an author’s control leads them to the understand- ing of the writer as the mere “operator of the device” (p. 41). Chapter 2 examines Valerian Pereverzev and his followers’ search for the forces outside the individual author that shape poetic phenomena. If for the Formalists these forces were about the governing constructive principles of the literary form, for the Pereverzev sociological school the “objective social content” (p. 63) performed a similar function of supra-personal force, instru- mental in the formation of literary texts. In Chapter 3, Petrov discusses Bogdanov’s science of tektology as a theoretical project anticipating structuralist critiques of the subject to be found in the writ- ings of Claude Levi-Strauss, Louis Althusser, and early Michel Foucault. Petrov even uses Foucault’s term “episteme” to describe Bogdanov’s vision of human history as a series of major epochs of tektological developments, each with its own distinct configuration of knowledge. Within this system of social practice, the individual thinks within the social organization to which he belongs. Or, as Petrov puts it, “when he thinks, it is the social organization that ‘thinks’ him” (87). A key distinction for Petrov is between Bogdanov’s tektology and a struc- turalist analysis of subjectivity: Bogdanov’s subject lives in history (88). Petrov’s next chapter addresses Soviet avant-garde implementations of the cultural practices intended to replace traditional art. He looks at a variety of such projects, including “objectism,” production art, biography of the object, literature of fact, and constructivist cinema of the Kinoks. These experimen- tal practices, he contends, shun the label “aesthetic” (90) and emphasize mak- ing (delanie), “letting the essential being of ‘this’ [the material reality ap] … emerge from latency” (98). According to the practitioners of Constructivism and production art, material itself is an active agency, while the author yields his active role to the constructor, machinist, organizer, engineer—or, better, to the machine itself—as in the Kinoks’ cinematic manifesto, Man with a Movie Camera. Dziga Vertov is relegated to the position on behalf of, or rather “as the movie camera” (104). Petrov concludes his discussion of 1920s’ theorists by examining the Russian Association of Proletarian Writers (rapp), specifically rapp’s understanding of authorial agency. If Constructivists in the process of ‘making the material’ revealed its “social tectonic,” rapp literary critics contended that in the new society proletarian authors revealed the agency of their consciousness when they became aware of their class nature and the political imperatives that such a social position imposed on the writer. Proletarian writers’ creative freedom was, above all, about the social commission, which the author accepted volun- tarily because he had fully comprehended his political and literary function within the great whole of society. the soviet and post-sovietDownloaded review from 44 Brill.com09/28/2021 (2017) 357-378 01:26:52AM via free access <UN> Book Reviews 375 The opening chapter of Part Two focuses on the kinship and key differences between modernist and socialist realist artistic practices. The author claims that both cultural imaginations “feature symbolic rituals in which artistic prac- tice is presented as driven by imperative objectivity” (31). For modernists such objectivity meant the project of bringing out of concealment either a govern- ing constructive principle or true class consciousness and the simultaneous dissolution of individual agency as an accessory to the forces revealed. For Stalinist socialist realism, contends Petrov, the futuristic temporality of Soviet modernists is irrelevant because socialism has already arrived and the mod- ernist subject, the author, is replaced with the social position of the scribe be- longing to the socialist community and re-confirming the presence of the new world in its essential reality. Chapter 7 expands on the formation of the Stalinist subject and the tempo- rality of the culture producing such a new subject. Petrov specifically discusses Stalinist culture’s obsession with ahead-of-the-schedule completion of its proj- ects and contends that this new discursive formation favors a perfective sense of time over the futuristic time of Soviet culture of the 1920s (31). Since socialist life and its grand style have already arrived, the subject does not see and de- scribe, but rather exists as the one “in whom the self-knowing of the world, its being-foreseen, would be confirmed” (31). The individual exists as a vehicle for the realization of world-historical experience, which has already reached its fruition in the collective life of Soviet society. In Chapter 8, “Ideology as Authentication,” Petrov examines how social- ist realism reproduces itself as culture and gives the socialist subject (and by extension the author) representations to live in. Taking his inspiration from Louis Althusser’s Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, Petrov examines socialist realism not so much as a method for retransmitting political dog- mas into aesthetic forms, but as ideology synonymous with culture itself (32). Stalinism, Petrov claims, developed its own mode of symbolic performance, a counterpart to modernist performance of the death of the author, which Petrov calls “authentication.” Socialist realist authors, he contends, “act as if in their artistic practice they were acted [upon ap] by the socio-economic organism to which they belong” (193). These acts of authentication share with modernist performances of the author’s death a belief that subjectivity is shaped by forces beyond its control. The fundamental difference between modernist depersonalization and socialist realist “authentication” is in the na- ture of the power shaping one’s subjectivity. In the case of Stalinist ideology, the authentication was a state-inspired day-to-day acting out of authors’ belief in Marxism-Leninism and the production of these beliefs as if they were born from the immanent logic of the new socio-economic infrastructure of Soviet the soviet and post-soviet review 44 (2017) 357-378Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 01:26:52AM via free access <UN> 376 Book Reviews life. While I agree with Petrov’s argument, I wish he had provided for the reader who does not consume Stalinist texts on an everyday basis more historical con- text, specifically, the fact that most of the inspiration provided by the Stalinist state for its subjects came out of the ubiquitous atmosphere of fear and mass political terror, a factor less important in the culture of the 1920s. Chapter 9 provides some of this context and zooms in on the First Congress of Soviet Writers as a case study to analyze the Soviet writer as Stalinist quasi-agent of representation. Analyzing the ideology and rhetoric of speech- es and events at the Congress, Petrov singles out the recurring Russian verb proniknut’sia, used by participants of the Congress to describe their sense of belonging to the new culture, which makes them socialist realist writers. Proniknut’sia, notes Petrov, means “through one’s own activity to render one- self penetrable, to bring one’s own permeation with something initially exter- nal” (207).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Socialist Realism Seen in Maxim Gorky's Play The
    SOCIALIST REALISM SEEN IN MAXIM GORKY’S PLAY THE LOWER DEPTHS AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By AINUL LISA Student Number: 014214114 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2009 SOCIALIST REALISM SEEN IN MAXIM GORKY’S PLAY THE LOWER DEPTHS AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By AINUL LISA Student Number: 014214114 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2009 i ii iii HHaappppiinneessss aallwwaayyss llooookkss ssmmaallll wwhhiillee yyoouu hhoolldd iitt iinn yyoouurr hhaannddss,, bbuutt lleett iitt ggoo,, aanndd yyoouu lleeaarrnn aatt oonnccee hhooww bbiigg aanndd pprreecciioouuss iitt iiss.. (Maxiim Gorky) iv Thiis Undergraduatte Thesiis iis dediicatted tto:: My Dear Mom and Dad,, My Belloved Brotther and Siistters.. v vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to praise Allah SWT for the blessings during the long process of this undergraduate thesis writing. I would also like to thank my patient and supportive father and mother for upholding me, giving me adequate facilities all through my study, and encouragement during the writing of this undergraduate thesis, my brother and sisters, who are always there to listen to all of my problems. I am very grateful to my advisor Gabriel Fajar Sasmita Aji, S.S., M.Hum. for helping me doing my undergraduate thesis with his advice, guidance, and patience during the writing of my undergraduate thesis. My gratitude also goes to my co-advisor Dewi Widyastuti, S.Pd., M.Hum.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet-Indian Coproductions: Ali Baba As Political Allegory
    Soviet-Indian Coproductions: Ali Baba as Political Allegory by MASHA SALAZKINA Abstract: This essay considers the history of Soviet Indian coproductions focusing on Ali Baba and 40 Thieves (1980) as a political allegory over the fate of the multination state. It addresses the formal utopian character of the fi lm and the excessive threat of sexual violence in the song-and-dance numbers. he subject of this essay is the little studied phenomenon of the Soviet-Indian cinematic coproductions. While giving a general outline of the history of these coproductions, I focus primarily on the most commercially successful of these joint efforts, Ali Baba and 40 Thieves (Alibaba Aur 40 Chor/Priklyucheniya Ali-Baby Ti soroka razboinikov, Latif Faiziyev and Umesh Mehra, 1980), henceforward Alibaba. I argue that the fi lm contains a political allegory expressing anxiety over the fate of the multination state; that anxiety lies beneath the formal utopian character of the fi lm, which attempts to show the constitution of a new community on the screen and to defi ne the role of its political subject in the face of crime and governmental corruption. I will address these issues through discussing the directors’ choice of the material (a story from One Thousand and One Nights, or The Arabian Nights, as it is better known in English); the narrative structure of the fi lm; performance histories of the Indian and Soviet actors; and, fi nally, through a reading of the excessive threat of sexual violence concentrated in the fi lm’s song-and-dance numbers. Alibaba, I con- tend, is of interest not only due to the formal and institutional hybridization of two autonomous cinematic traditions, Indian and Soviet, but also as a cultural object which displays a shared anxiety over the role of the state as its existing political and economic order moves palpably toward the brink of collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Afterlife of Stalinist Musical Films
    THE STRANGE AFTERLIFE OF STALINIST MUSICA L FILM S Rimgaila Salys University of Colorado — Boulder The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research 910 17 th Street, N .W . Suite 300 Washington, D .C. 20006 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Rimgaila Salys Council Contract Number : 817-08 Date : March 12, 2003 Copyright Information Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funde d through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicat e and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract o r Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER's own internal use, or (b) for use by the United State s Government, and as follows: (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreig n governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2 ) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of th e United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United State s Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of thi s Report may use it for commercial sale . The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by th e National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available b y the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Trainin g Act of 1983, as amended) .
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Cinema: Art and Politics from the Avant-Garde to the Return of the Stalinist Repressed
    SOVIET CINEMA: ART AND POLITICS FROM THE AVANT-GARDE TO THE RETURN OF THE STALINIST REPRESSED PROF. DANIEL SCHWARTZ RUSS 395 WINTER 2021 COURSE DESCRIPTION The history of Soviet cinema traces the conflicting ideologies and social anxieties of the USSR. This course aims to acquaint students with these ideologies and anxieties through the films of major and minor Soviet directors. It offers a broad survey of the pivotal transformations of Soviet cinema from the pre-Soviet silent era through the Russian avant- garde (1920s), Socialist Realism (1930s and 40s), New Wave (1950s and 60s), Stagnation (1970s), Perestroika and the fall of communism (1980s). Special attention will be given to women and minority filmmakers including Larissa Shepitko, Kira Muratova, and Sergei Parajanov. Key questions we will ask include: How does film function as propaganda or entertainment? How does it foster a multi-ethnic Soviet community? What are the political implications of a film’s stylistic choices? By the end of the course, students will be able to situate Soviet films in their cultural, historical, and theoretical contexts. BASIC INFORMATION Professor: Daniel Schwartz ([email protected]) Office Hours: Thursday, 17:30 – 19:30, or by appointment. REQUIRED READING All Readings will be made available on My Courses Students must have read the readings before class meets / as necessary to complete assignments. REQUIRED FILMS Film for this class are available on various streaming platforms including Kanopy, YouTube, and Amazon. McGill has a subscription to Kanopy that is available to all students. Login at https://mcgill.kanopy.com. Unfortunately, McGill does not have online access to every film I wish to show for this course.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Reclaiming Native Soil: Cultural Mythologies of Soil in Russia and Its Eastern Borderlands from the 1840s to the 1930s Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74g4p86x Author Erley, Laura Mieka Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Reclaiming Native Soil: Cultural Mythologies of Soil in Russia and Its Eastern Borderlands from the 1840s to the 1930s by Laura Mieka Erley A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures and the Designated Emphasis in Film Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, Chair Professor Olga Matich Professor Eric Naiman Professor Jeffrey Skoller Fall 2012 Reclaiming Native Soil: Cultural Mythologies of Soil in Russia and its Eastern Borderlands from the 1840s to the 1930s © 2012 by Laura Mieka Erley Abstract Reclaiming Native Soil: Cultural Mythologies of Soil in Russia and Its Eastern Borderlands from the 1840s to the 1930s By Laura Mieka Erley Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures and the Designated Emphasis in Film Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair This dissertation explores the cultural topos of soil in Russian and early Soviet culture. Centered on the Soviet project of land reclamation in Central Asia in the 1930s, this dissertation traces the roots of Soviet utopian and dystopian fantasies of soil to the ideological and discursive traditions of the 19th century. It considers how Soviet cultural, scientific, and political figures renovated and adapted 19th-century discourse in order to articulate for their own age the national, revolutionary, and utopian values attached to soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Art in Europe 1945
    Facing the Future Art in Europe 1945 - 1968 Facing the Future Art in Europe 1945 - 1968 1945 - 1968 After the liberation View of the ruined British Prime Minister of the Auschwitz centre of Warsaw after Winston Churchill, US concentration camp by the retreat of the President Franklin D. the Red Army, German troops, Roosevelt and Soviet leader children show January 1945 Joseph Stalin during the photographers the © BPK Three Power Conference at prisoner numbers Yalta, February 1945. Photo: tattooed into their arms, Samary Gurary February 1945. © MAMM/MDF COLLECTION, MOSCOW © BPK 1945 27/01/1945. Jan 1945. 04-11/02/1945. Liberation of the The name “auschwitz” victims came from Warsaw, Poland, in Yalta Conference surviving prisoners has become a byword Belgium, Germany, ruins, January 1945 The three main Allies from the Auschwitz for the Holocaust. France, Greece, Italy, of World War II (USA, concentration camp There were over 5.6 Yugoslavia, Luxembourg, UK, USSR) discuss Auschwitz-Birkenau million victims of the the Netherlands, the denazifi cation, was the biggest German Holocaust, of whom Austria, Poland, demilitarization, death camp during the around 1.1 million Romania, the Soviet democratization and Nazi era. It was located people, including Union, Czechoslovakia partition of Germany, near the Polish town of a million Jews, and Hungary. along with the distribution Oświęcim, which was were murdered at of power in Europe after renamed Auschwitz. Birkenau. Most of the the end of the war. timeline I 1945-1950 ➤ Poster from the Fantasten exhibition, Galerie Gerd Rosen, Berlin, February 1946 © BPK 1945 15/06/1945. 03/07/1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Khrushchev and Socialist Realism: a Study Op the Political Control Op Soviet Literature, 1960-1963
    KHRUSHCHEV AND SOCIALIST REALISM: A STUDY OP THE POLITICAL CONTROL OP SOVIET LITERATURE, 1960-1963 APPROVED: Major Professor linor Professo '\ OLSMI DirectoJMr of the Department of Government ,!»».!ui * Deait of the Graduate School KHRUSHCHEV AND SOCIALIST REALISM: A STUDY OP THE POLITICAL CONTROL OP SOVIET LITERATURE, 1960-1963 THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OP ARTS BY Harold R. Sanders, B. A, Denton, Texas August, 1969 TABLE OP CONTENTS Page LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS Iv Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. METHODS OP POLITICAL CONTROL OP LITERATURE. 11 III. SOCIALIST REALISM: AN APPRAISAL 28 IV. KHRUSHCHEV AND SOCIALIST REALISM, 1960-1963: A CASE STUDY 38 V. A SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OP THE KHRUSHCHEV PERIOD . 57 VI. CONCLUSION 71 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 81 iii LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Pag® 1. The Political System 7 2. Representative Model of a Political System 58 3. Political Socialization as a Viable Function of the Whole Political System 64 4. The System in Perspective 66 5. Khrushchev's Response to the Writers' Demands ... 69 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The purpose of this thesis is to examine the topic of political control of literature within the Soviet Union. The specific scope of this examination includes an investi- gation of Nikita S. Khrushchev and his utilization of socialist realism as one of the primary methods of literary control during the period, I96O-I963. A study of literature and its political control will demonstrate the important and dynamic roles which the political control of literature fulfills in the political system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Analysis of the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky in Relation to the Post-Thaw Soviet Moment
    A Historical Analysis of the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky in Relation to the Post-Thaw Soviet Moment Gus Helbock Haverford College Class of 2017 History Thesis Professor Linda Gerstein Professor James Krippner April 21, 2017 Helbock i Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank the professors at Haverford College who guided me through my educational experience, especially in the History Department. Specifically, I am grateful for the help that Professor Linda Gerstein and Professor James Krippner provided as my first reader/advisor and second reader, respectively. The advice they gave me and the historical insight they provided were integral in the completion of this thesis. I would also like to thank my family and friends who have given me love and support throughout the entirety of the thesis process. Helbock ii Abstract During the latter half of the twentieth century, Andrei Tarkovsky received arguably more critical admiration for his films than any Soviet director. During his filmmaking career, the Soviet Union experienced a tumultuous socio-cultural, as well as political, moment. After the death of Stalin, the Khrushchev Thaw of the late 1950s and early 1960s allowed for significantly more freedom of expression. It was at this time that Tarkovsky’s career began. However, through the 1960s and 1970s, a reactionary period in Soviet politics led to a return of stringent censorship, making Tarkovsky’s filmmaking process difficult. In the early 1980s, Tarkovsky emigrated to Western Europe, where he completed his final two films before his death in 1986. Due to his contentious relationship with the Soviet state, this thesis will attempt to analyze Tarkovsky and assess his relationship to the Russian intelligentsia and the dissident movements of the late twentieth century, as well as his relationship with spirituality and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Vol. 20 (August 2020), No. 151 Catherine Dossin
    H-France Review Volume 20 (2020) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 20 (August 2020), No. 151 Catherine Dossin, ed., France and the Visual Arts since 1945: Remapping European Postwar and Contemporary Art. New York and London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2019. $130.00 U.S. (hb). ISBN 9781501341526; $39.95 U.S. (pb). ISBN 9781501355752; $35.95 U.S. (eb). ISBN 9781501341533. Review by Natalie Adamson, School of Art History, University of St Andrews, Scotland. French art (or rather, art made in France) holds a highly privileged place in the broader field of study of Western modernity, modernism and the avant-gardes. But for the “postwar” decades after 1945, it has been persistently defined as the weak and decidedly un-heroic contrast to the power and innovation of American art and its histories. France and the Visual Arts since 1945: Remapping European Postwar and Contemporary Art aims to redress that imbalance. Indeed, editor Catherine Dossin suggests “another template” is needed in order to “rewrite the whole story” (p.13). That said, the overall narrative largely amplifies the general routes taken by a socially oriented modernist art history with its avant- and neo-avant-gardes, its rejection of painting after 1960 and the move to postmodernist practices, this time placing France and French art firmly at the centre. As such, the volume as a whole makes an invaluable contribution to our knowledge of French art worlds. The seventeen compact essays are founded upon richly informative archival research and pay attention to many little-known artists, groups and artworks. It is obviously impossible for a single volume, even with such a number of essays, to encompass every artistic medium, artist or event between 1945 and the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • Redplenty.Pdf
    The Red Plenty Book Event — a round-table discussion of Francis Spufford’s novel, Red Plenty — ran on Crooked Timber from May 29 to June 14, 2012. online permalink: http://www.crookedtimber.org/categories/red_plenty_seminar The Book Event was organized by Henry Farrell. The book was edited by Henry Farrell and John Holbo, and designed by John Holbo. The Red Plenty Book Event is CC licensed: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. iii Contents Red Plenty is a Novel Kim Stanley Robinson 1 Red Plenty or Red Poverty? Reality versus ‘Psychoprophyilaxis’: Reflections on Spufford’s Vision of The Rise And The Decline of The Communist System Antoaneta Dimitrova 3 To market, to market … or not? George Scialabba 11 In Soviet Union, Optimization Problem Solves Yo u Cosma Shalizi 21 On Narrating a System Carl Caldwell 47 Red Plenty – My Brush With Brezhnevism John Holbo 53 You Are Alone, In A Dark Wood. Now Cope. Henry Farrell 57 New Ideas From Dead Political Systems Daniel Davies 67 Worlds of Yesterday Felix Gilman 73 Good and Plenty Rich Yeselson 79 Will we ever know what otherwise is? Did we ever?Life, Fate and Irony Niamh Hardiman 85 Red Plenty:What WereThey Thinking? Maria Farrell 91 Red Plenty - or - Socialism Without Doctrines John Quiggin 97 Response Francis Spufford 101 Contributors 127 Red Plenty is a Novel Kim Stanley Robinson I loved Francis Spufford’sRed Plenty, which is a very beau- tiful novel. There seems to be some unnecessary confusion as to its form or genre. You can see that in the front matter of the American edition, in which it is described as “like no other history book,” “a collection of stories,” “faction,” “part detective story,” “a set of artfully interwoven genres,” “the least promis- ing fictional material of all time,” “reverse magical realism,” and “half novel/half history”.
    [Show full text]
  • And Post-Soviet Literature and Culture
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture Pavel Khazanov University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, European History Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Khazanov, Pavel, "Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2894. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2894 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2894 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture Abstract The return of Tsarist buildings, narratives and symbols has been a prominent facet of social life in post- Soviet Russia. My dissertation aims to explain this phenomenon and its meaning by tracking contemporary Russia’s cultural memory of the Imperial era. By close-reading both popular and influential cultural texts, as well as analyzing their conditions of production and reception, I show how three generations of Russian cultural elites from the 1950s until today have used Russia’s past to fight present- day political battles, and outline how the cultural memory of the Imperial epoch continues to inform post- Soviet Russian leaders and their mainstream detractors. Chapters One and Two situate the origin of Russian culture’s current engagement with the pre-Revolutionary era in the social dynamic following Stalin’s death in 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Josch Lampe 2021
    Copyright by Josch Lampe 2021 The Dissertation Committee for Josch Lampe Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Dissertation: The Marxisms of West Germany's "1968": Remaking a Public Critique through Literary Magazines Committee: Katherine Arens, Supervisor Pascale R. Bos Kirkland A. Fulk Sabine Hake Jan Uelzmann The Marxisms of West Germany's "1968": Remaking a Public Critique through Literary Magazines by Josch Lampe Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2021 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor and committee, without whom this dissertation would not have been possible. The University of Texas at Austin and its Department of Germanic Studies have been crucial for this research project in both intellectual and financial ways. Research grants for the summers of 2018 and 2019 from the Department and a University Graduate Continuing Fellowship from the Graduate School for the academic year 2019–20 made it possible for me to devote my energies to my project and to complete it despite the disruptions of 2020. I would also like to thank the American Friends of Marbach, who granted me a dissertation fellowship to conduct research at the German Literature Archive in Marbach, Germany, in the summer of 2018. Vast parts of this dissertation are based on data that I was able to access thanks to the archivists, researchers, and staff in Marbach, especially Jan Bürger, Christoph Hilse, Gerhild Kölling, Petra Weiß, and Robert Zwarg.
    [Show full text]