Cities and Sieges in Medieval Europe * Carl Mosk ** December, 2017 * This is a preliminary treatment. My long-run goal is to apply the analysis to the European conquest of the New World; as well I want to use it as a launching pad for a systematic comparison of Tokugawa Japan with Medieval and Mercantilist Europe. Comments would be much appreciated: please direct them to my e-mail address. Please do not cite without the permission of the author. ** Professor Emeritus at the University of Victoria and Lecturer at the University of California at Davis www.carlmosk.com
[email protected] 1 Abstract During the Medieval period Europe was highly fragmented and heavily militarized. Conflict was on-going. Still commerce thrived, particularly after 1000 CE. Why? The main reason is the relative peace accorded to cities. Remarkably few cities were besieged. Why? The main reason is three powerful actors – feudal lords and heads of manorial estates; the church, both in its secular arm and in its monasteries; and dynasties attempting to aggrandize their territorial reach – all benefited from the rents that they could extract from the commerce carried on by urban denizens. In competing for the rents they were also competing for power, particularly but not exclusively military power bought and sold on the market. Employing a data base consisting of 415 battles and sieges taking place during the Medieval Period, this paper explores a remarkable paradox: both commerce and conflict, de facto opposites, thrived because of each other, not despite each other. 2