DOCSLIB.ORG

Chesapeake Name C CON Striped Bass 0.122 8 Summer Flounder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chesapeake Name C CON Striped Bass 0.122 8 Summer Flounder Chesapeake ChesLower Name C CON Name C CON striped bass 0.122 8 Weakfish 0.349 38 summer flounder 0.266 16 Bluefish 0.028 12 weakfish 0.244 20 Striped Bass 0.028 12 bluefish 0.289 21 Catfish 0.293 22 catfish 0.305 31 American eel 0.293 22 white perch 0.297 24 Hogchoker 0.302 34 spot 0.244 20 Croaker 0.028 12 hogchoker 0.114 9 Spot 0.028 12 croaker 0.168 37 White Perch 0.312 24 shad 0.168 37 Herrings and Shads 0.316 27 menhaden 0.114 9 Bay anchovy 0.321 39 bay anchovy 0.114 9 Menhaden 0.028 12 alewife blue herring 0.474 28 Blue Crab 0.321 25 fish larvae 0.302 6 Oysters 0.302 19 blue crab 0.313 8 Suspension Feeding Benthos 0.298 13 crustacean deposit feeder 0.302 6 Deposit Feeding Benthos 0.289 5 meiofauna 0.302 6 Meiofauna 0.028 12 macoma spp. 0.302 6 SAV 0.189 3 nereis 0.168 34 Microphytobenthos 0.233 11 other polychaetes 0.168 34 Chrysaora 0.316 33 oysters 0.168 34 Ctenophores 0.316 27 mya arenaria 0.114 12 Mesozooplankton 0.037 8 other suspension feeders 0.155 34 Meroplankton 0.26 21 sea nettle 0.155 34 Rotifers 0.238 4 ctenophores 0.155 30 Ciliates 0.298 8 zooplankton 0.047 2 Heteroflagellates 0.338 2 ciliates 0.047 0 heterotrophic microflagel 0.026 3 benthic diatoms 0.132 9 1 ChesMiddle ChesUpper Name C CON Name C CON Weakfish 0.395 48 Weakfish 0.431 60 Bluefish 0.395 49 Bluefish 0.369 29 Striped Bass 0.343 32 Striped Bass 0.343 30 Catfish 0.36 38 Catfish 0.451 33 American eel 0.36 38 American Eel 0.459 39 Hogchoker 0.36 38 Hogchoker 0.459 39 Croaker 0.39 51 Croaker 0.474 57 Spot 0.028 10 Spot 0.444 38 White Perch 0.39 33 White Perch 0.444 38 Herrings and Shads 0.39 26 Herrings and Shads 0.431 29 Bay anchovy 0.36 52 Bay anchovy 0.384 54 Menhaden 0.028 10 Menhaden 0.028 9 Blue Crab 0.401 37 Blue Crab 0.438 31 Oysters 0.347 34 Oysters 0.136 21 Suspension Feeding Benthos 0.339 18 Suspension Feeding Benthos 0.124 15 Deposit Feeding Benthos 0.331 10 Deposit Feeding Benthos 0.105 8 Meiofauna 0.028 10 Meiofauna 0.028 9 SAV 0.293 22 SAV 0.246 3 Microphytobenthos 0.29 23 Microphytobenthos 0.316 23 Chrysaora 0.395 44 Chrysaora 0.444 49 Ctenophores 0.401 44 Ctenophores 0.444 41 Mesozooplankton 0.243 25 Mesozooplankton 0.245 27 Meroplankton 0.309 23 Meroplankton 0.313 24 Rotifers 0.284 4 Rotifers 0.29 4 Ciliates 0.369 9 Ciliates 0.418 12 Heteroflagellates 0.406 2 Heteroflagellates 0.418 2 2 CrystalC CrystalD Name C CON Name C CON gulf flounder 0.457 50 mullet 0.314 15 mullet 0.325 18 red drum 0.314 15 pinfish 0.479 33 black drum 0.349 22 sheepshead 0.479 33 spot 0.479 29 silver jenny 0.479 33 pinfish 0.479 29 moharra 0.314 14 moharra 0.043 4 silverside 0.457 57 silverside 0.314 15 longnosed killifish 0.492 37 molly 0.408 40 gulf killifish 0.479 29 longnosed killifish 0.492 33 goldspotted killifish 0.457 51 gulf killifish 0.479 27 sheepshead killifish 0.505 37 goldspotted killifish 0.342 11 needlefish 0.479 33 sheepshead killifish 0.314 15 bay anchovy 0.426 26 needlefish 0.479 29 striped anchovy 0.32 6 catfish 0.342 11 stingray 0.457 11 bay anchovy 0.457 8 blacktip shark 0.457 11 stingray 0.457 8 benthic invertebrates 0.043 4 benthic invertebrates 0.043 1 zooplankton 0.0 0 zooplankton 0.0 0 3 Everglades ...Everglades Continued Name C CON Name C CON Passerines 0.478 520 Topminnows 0.572 452 CSSsparrow 0.334 28 Flagfish 0.504 168 Gruiformes 0.4 78 Catfish 0.517 223 Nighthawks 0.448 502 Chubsuckers 0.439 347 Snailkites 0.445 449 Shiners Minnows 0.384 228 Ducks 0.439 438 Gar 0.5 67 Bitterns 0.424 42 Fishing spider 0.352 151 Grebes 0.442 44 Terrestrial Inverts 0.525 202 Panthers 0.033 33 Large Aquatic Insects 0.521 159 Bobcat 0.689 605 Other Macroinverts 0.529 242 W-T Deer 0.497 466 Mesoinverts 0.362 214 Mink 0.548 169 Crayfish 0.346 83 Otter 0.478 348 Freshwater Prawn 0.015 4 Opossum 0.02 20 Apple snail 0.344 47 Raccoons 0.408 82 Floating Veg. 0.015 4 Rabbits 0.033 33 Utricularia 0.015 4 RatsMice 0.593 482 Macrophytes 0.485 36 Muskrats 0.358 49 Periphyton 0.468 11 Alligators 0.464 424 Lizards 0.534 471 Snakes 0.504 104 Turtles 0.386 234 Tadpoles 0.386 245 Small frogs 0.411 327 Medium frogs 0.346 62 Large frogs 0.364 162 Salamander larvae 0.521 234 Salamanders 0.4 345 Other Small Fishes 0.395 324 Other Large Fishes 0.413 393 Cichlids 0.517 258 Largemouth Bass 0.362 222 Other Centrarchids 0.358 189 Spotted sunfish 0.358 196 Redear Sunfish 0.403 401 Dollar Sunfish 0.354 168 Warmouth 0.354 168 Bluespotted Sunfish 0.512 158 Pigmy Sunfish 0.525 262 Poecilids 0.512 215 Mosquitofishes 0.521 234 Killifishes 0.354 168 Bluefin killifish 0.5 66 4 Florida ....Florida Continued Name C CON Name C CON Manatee 0.398 528 Other Snapper 0.414 549 Dolphin 0.018 37 Pompano 0.387 829 Hawksbill Turtle 0.417 712 Jacks 0.381 469 Green Turtle 0.466 672 Grouper 0.382 507 Loggerhead Turtle 0.357 637 Dwarf Seahorse 0.381 469 Crocodiles 0.438 944 Gulf Pipefish 0.383 447 Kingfisher 0.441 960 Other Horsefish 0.072 128 Gulls Terns 0.438 944 Silverside 0.407 649 Small Shorebirds 0.481 364 Sailfin Molly 0.397 702 Gruiformes 0.488 1024 Snook 0.399 771 Raptors 0.414 744 Rainwater killifish 0.391 589 Predatory Ducks 0.406 691 Goldspotted killifish 0.345 338 Omnivorous Ducks 0.444 924 Other Killifish 0.327 204 Herbivorous Ducks 0.439 933 Needlefish 0.332 475 Roseate Spoonbill 0.443 882 Halfbeaks 0.332 475 Ibis 0.481 959 Brotalus 0.423 733 Small Herons Egrets 0.403 719 Toadfish 0.43 696 Big Herons Egrets 0.403 713 Eels 0.344 580 Comorant 0.484 973 Catfish 0.383 447 Pelican 0.413 858 Lizardfish 0.398 657 Greeb 0.436 903 Bay Anchovy 0.399 653 Loon 0.421 550 Anchovy 0.426 806 Other Demersal Fishes 0.406 661 Sardines 0.409 602 Other Pelagic Fishes 0.405 395 Bonefish 0.396 563 Puffer 0.424 838 Tarpon 0.454 755 Filefishes 0.373 321 Rays 0.374 251 Flatfish 0.373 321 Sharks 0.391 262 Clown Goby 0.311 419 Stone Crab 0.391 262 Code Goby 0.416 509 Callinectus sapidus 0.399 341 Blennies 0.389 285 Predatory Crabs 0.377 73 Barracuda 0.335 222 Omnivorous Crabs 0.31 234 Mullet 0.38 286 Detritivorous Crabs 0.01 22 Mackerel 0.337 539 Lobster 0.411 343 Parrotfish 0.435 775 Thor Floridanus 0.402 432 Spadefish 0.429 705 Pink Shrimp 0.018 38 Red Drum 0.452 1074 Predatory Shrimp 0.033 65 Spotted Seatrout 0.42 782 Herbivorous Shrimp 0.379 100 Scianids 0.394 630 Isopods 0.379 78 Pinfish 0.413 834 Herbivorous Amphipods 0.379 78 Porgy 0.41 736 Detritivorous Amphipods 0.38 94 Grunt 0.366 606 Benthic Crustaceans 0.463 154 Mojarra 0.367 636 Macrobenthos 0.41 367 Gray Snapper 0.451 1080 Suspension Feeding Polych 0.379 78 5 ....Florida Continued Name C CON Predatory Polychaetes 0.387 133 Detritivorous Polychaetes 0.01 22 Predatory Gastropods 0.38 94 Epiphytic Gastropods 0.451 124 Detritivorous Gastropods 0.429 496 Bivalves 0.397 532 Echinoderma 0.321 151 Other Cnidaridae 0.449 124 Coral 0.376 56 Sponges 0.375 46 Meiofauna 0.374 35 Benthic Ciliates 0.452 133 Benthic Flagellates 0.446 168 Other Zooplankton 0.438 79 Meroplankton 0.452 133 Other Copepoda 0.452 133 Paracalanus 0.452 133 Oithona nana 0.447 116 Acartia Tonsa 0.436 69 Water Cilitaes 0.057 0 Water Flagellates 0.008 17 Epiphytes 0.008 17 Drift Algae 0.008 17 Roots 0.008 17 Syringodium 0.008 17 Halodule 0.008 17 Thalassia 0.008 17 Benthic Phytoplankton 0.008 17 Other Phytoplankton 0.008 17 Dinoflagellates 0.008 17 Big Diatoms (>20um) 0.008 17 Small Diatoms (<20um) 0.008 17 Oscillatoria 0.008 17 6 Maspalomas Michigan Name C CON Name C CON Dicentratus punctatus 0.098 5 Sea lamprey 0.371 53 Diplodus Sargus 0.457 16 Lake trout 0.371 53 Gallinula chloropus 0.295 5 Chinook 0.362 40 Liza Aurata 0.417 6 Coho 0.371 53 Benthic Invertebrate Car. 0.232 14 Steelhead 0.406 80 Benthic Deposit Feeders 0.408 4 Brown trout 0.39 65 Benthic Suspension Feeder 0.174 7 Burbot 0.371 53 Benthic Microfauna 0.194 11 Juv. Lake Trout 0.371 53 Macrozooplankton 0.178 7 Juv.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Predator/Prey Interactions, Competition, Multi
    Current understanding of trophic dynamics In the Mid-Atlantic Bluefish diets, Mid Atlantic and Southern New England, NEFSC surveys 100% All others All Flatfish 90% Unid fish Unid Unid fish Unid fish Unid fish Scup 80% Scup Unid fish Scup Bluefish Butterfish Bluefish 70% Mackerel Bluefish Butterfish Butterfish Hakes 60% Loligo Drums Butterfish Unid Squid Ocean pout Round herring 50% Butterfish Ctenophores Menhaden Loligo Loligo Loligo 40% Loligo Unid Squid Round herring Illex Bay anchovy Unid Squid Unid Squid Silver anchovy Round herring Round herring 30% Bay anchovy Menhaden Unid herring Bay anchovy Menhaden Bay anchovy Striped anchovy 20% Silver anchovy Unid anchovies Bay anchovy Striped anchovy Unid anchovies 10% Striped anchovy Unid anchovies Sand lances Unid anchovies Sand lances Sand lances Sand lances 0% 1977-86 1987-96 1997-2006 2007-2013 Food web models partition mortality 100% 90% 80% If Pred > F, 70% Pred Re-evaluate 60% constant M 50% 40% Proportion of total Mortality total Proportion of F 30% 20% 10% Proportion of total mortality total of Proportion 0% Longnose skate P. Halibut W. Pollock Squids Gaichas et al. 2010 Fishing Predation Other Link et al. 2008. The Northeast U.S. continental shelf Energy Modeling and Analysis exercise (EMAX): Ecological network model development and basic ecosystem metrics. Journal of Marine Systems 74: 453-474 Intermediate tactical multispecies models An intermediate-complexity tactical ecosystem assessment tool combines: Standard stock assessment Ecosystem considerations • Structured population
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020
    Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020 A team from the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries uses electrofishing to monitor invasive blue catfish in the James River in 2011. (Photo by Matt Rath/Chesapeake Bay Program) I. Introduction This management strategy portrays the outcomes of an interactive workshop (2020 Invasive Catfish Workshop) held by the Invasive Catfish Workgroup at the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Rice Rivers Center in Charles City, Virginia on January 29-30, 2020. The workshop convened a diverse group of stakeholders to share the current scientific understanding and priority issues associated with invasive catfishes in Chesapeake Bay. The perspectives shared and insights gained from the workshop were used to develop practical, synergistic recommendations that will improve management and mitigate impacts of these species across jurisdictions within the watershed. Blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) and flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris) are native to the Ohio, Missouri, Mississippi, and Rio Grande river basins, and were introduced into the Virginia tributaries of Chesapeake Bay in the 1960s and 1970s to establish a recreational fishery. These non-native species have since spread, inhabiting nearly all major tributaries of the Bay watershed. Rapid range expansion and population growth, particularly of blue catfish, have led to increasing concerns about impacts on the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. 1 Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy Invasive Catfish Blue and flathead catfishes are long-lived species that can negatively impact native species in Chesapeake Bay through predation and resource competition. Blue catfish are generalist feeders that prey on a wide variety of species that are locally abundant, including those of economic importance and conservation concern, such as blue crabs, alosines, Atlantic menhaden, American eels, and bay anchovy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Atlantic Forage Species ID Guide
    Mid-Atlantic Forage Species Identification Guide Forage Species Identification Guide Basic Morphology Dorsal fin Lateral line Caudal fin This guide provides descriptions and These species are subject to the codes for the forage species that vessels combined 1,700-pound trip limit: Opercle and dealers are required to report under Operculum • Anchovies the Mid-Atlantic Council’s Unmanaged Forage Omnibus Amendment. Find out • Argentines/Smelt Herring more about the amendment at: • Greeneyes Pectoral fin www.mafmc.org/forage. • Halfbeaks Pelvic fin Anal fin Caudal peduncle All federally permitted vessels fishing • Lanternfishes in the Mid-Atlantic Forage Species Dorsal Right (lateral) side Management Unit and dealers are • Round Herring required to report catch and landings of • Scaled Sardine the forage species listed to the right. All species listed in this guide are subject • Atlantic Thread Herring Anterior Posterior to the 1,700-pound trip limit unless • Spanish Sardine stated otherwise. • Pearlsides/Deepsea Hatchetfish • Sand Lances Left (lateral) side Ventral • Silversides • Cusk-eels Using the Guide • Atlantic Saury • Use the images and descriptions to identify species. • Unclassified Mollusks (Unmanaged Squids, Pteropods) • Report catch and sale of these species using the VTR code (red bubble) for • Other Crustaceans/Shellfish logbooks, or the common name (dark (Copepods, Krill, Amphipods) blue bubble) for dealer reports. 2 These species are subject to the combined 1,700-pound trip limit: • Anchovies • Argentines/Smelt Herring •
    [Show full text]
  • Fish for Your Health™ Advice for Pregnant Or Nursing Women, Women That Will Become Pregnant, and Children Under 6 Years of Age
    Fish for Your Health™ Advice for pregnant or nursing women, women that will become pregnant, and children under 6 years of age 1. Eat fish – Health experts recommend that women eat 8-12 ounces/week (weight before cooking) of fish. Children, ages 2-6, should eat at least 2 ounces/week. As a reference, 3 ounces of fish is about the size of a deck of cards. Women that eat fish which contains omega-3 fatty acids (EPA & DHA) will pass these nutrients to their babies and support healthy brain and eye development. Best Choices: Eating six ounces/week of the following fish provides the recommended amounts of healthy fats and will minimize your baby’s exposure to pollutants: salmon (wild or farm-raised), rainbow trout (farm-raised), herring, mackerel (Atlantic, Jack, chub), sardine, shad (American), whitefish. 2. Before eating recreationally-caught fish, check our Fish4Health website below for your State’s fish consumption advisory and avoid eating fish that is heavily contaminated with pollutants. If a fish that you caught is not listed in the advisory, then eat no more than 1 meal per month. If you are unsure about the safety of the fish that you caught, be safe - ‘catch-and-release’. 3. Minimize your exposure to pollutants in commercial fish - follow the advice given below. (Ex: If you eat 4 ounces of albacore tuna, then don’t eat any other fish from this category until the following week.) Level of Maximum Mercury Amount for Commercial Fish Species or PCBs** Adults to Eat anchovy, butterfish, catfish (farm-raised), clam, cod, crab (Blue, King
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 14 STOCK ASSESSMENT of PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA (Thunnus
    FINAL ISC/18/ANNEX/14 ANNEX 14 18th Meeting of the International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-Like Species in the North Pacific Ocean Yeosu, Republic of Korea July 11-16, 2018 STOCK ASSESSMENT OF PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA (Thunnus orientalis) IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN IN 2018 REPORT OF THE PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA WORKING GROUP July 2018 1 FINAL Left Blank for Printing FINAL Table of Contents 2018 Pacific Bluefin Tuna Stock Assessment ...........................................................................5 ISC PBFWG ...............................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAY 2018 ....................................................................................5 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................24 2.0 BACKGROUND ON BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES .......................................................25 2.1 Biology ...................................................................................................... 25 2.1.1 Stock Structure .............................................................................................. 25 2.1.2 Reproduction .................................................................................................. 25 2.1.3 Distribution and Movements ........................................................................ 25 2.1.4 Growth ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Updated Standardized CPUE of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Caught
    SCRS/08/100 Updated standardized CPUE of Atlantic bluefin tuna caught by the Spanish baitboat fishery in the Bay of Biscay (Eastern Atlantic). Time series from 1975 to 2007. Enrique Rodriguez-Marin1, Mauricio Ortiz2, Cristina Rodríguez-Cabello1 and Santiago Barreiro1 SUMMARY Updated standardized relative abundance indices by age are presented for bluefin tuna baitboat fishery in the Bay of Biscay from 1975 to 2007. Standardization was carried out using generalized linear mixed models. Catch and effort data on bluefin tuna were available from catches by trip; this catch by commercial category was converted to catch at age by applying seasonal age length keys to the length distribution by commercial category. In this update the age length keys of summer of the entire study period were reviewed. Age class was included as a fixed factor within model specifications because the fishery operates on all available stock fractions, and age determination of the tuna landings is done after removal of the catch. Splitting of the catches into age classes introduces a large number of zero values, so data were modeled using the delta- lognormal model. The model finally selected included the following explanatory factors: Year, Age, Month and Year × Age fixed factors, plus a selection of other factors contributing with a significant percentage of the total explained deviance in the aggregated model. All Year interactions besides the Year × Age factor were considered as random. CVs of present standardized index are less variable than the previous standardization time series from 1975 to 2004, but still some variability was found for the last years when the vessels built more recently and larger are included in the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Secretary of Commerce Petition to List the Pacific Bluefin Tuna
    Credit: aes256 [CC BY 2.1 jp] via Wikimedia Commons Before the Secretary of Commerce Petition to List the Pacific Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus orientalis) as Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act June 20, 2016 6/20/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Petitioners formally request that the Secretary of Commerce, through the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), list the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) as endangered or in the alternative list the species as threatened, under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 – 1544. Pacific bluefin tuna are severely overfished, and overfishing continues, making extinction a very real risk. According to the 2016 stock assessment by the International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-Like Species in the North Pacific Ocean (ISC), decades of overfishing have left the population at just 2.6% of its unfished size. Recent fishing rates (2011-2013) were up to three times higher than commonly used reference points for overfishing. The population’s severe decline, in combination with inadequate regulatory mechanisms to end overfishing or reverse the decline, has pushed Pacific bluefin tuna to the edge of extinction. Pacific bluefin tuna are important apex predators in the marine ecosystem and must be conserved. They are one of three bluefin tuna species. These three species are renowned for their large size, unique physiology and biomechanics, and capacity to swim across ocean basins. They are slow-growing, long-lived, endothermic fish. The Pacific bluefin migrates tens of thousands of miles across the largest ocean to feed and spawn, ranging from waters north of Japan to New Zealand in the western Pacific and off California and Mexico in the eastern Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Stock Status and Management Summaries for Selected Fish Species in South-Western Australia
    Fisheries Research Report No. 242, 2013 Biology, stock status and management summaries for selected fish species in south-western Australia Claire B. Smallwood, S. Alex Hesp and Lynnath E. Beckley Fisheries Research Division Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories PO Box 20 NORTH BEACH, Western Australia 6920 Correct citation: Smallwood, C. B.; Hesp, S. A.; and Beckley, L. E. 2013. Biology, stock status and management summaries for selected fish species in south-western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 242. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. 180pp. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Fisheries Western Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Fisheries Western Australia does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Fish illustrations Illustrations © R. Swainston / www.anima.net.au We dedicate this guide to the memory of our friend and colleague, Ben Chuwen Department of Fisheries 3rd floor SGIO Atrium 168 – 170 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Telephone: (08) 9482 7333 Facsimile: (08) 9482 7389 Website: www.fish.wa.gov.au ABN: 55 689 794 771 Published by Department of Fisheries, Perth, Western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 242, March 2013. ISSN: 1035 - 4549 ISBN: 978-1-921845-56-7 ii Fisheries Research Report No.242, 2013 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Access Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh
    The Open Access Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh As from January 2010 The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh (IJA) will be published exclusively as an on-line Open Access (OA) quarterly accessible by all AquacultureHub (http://www.aquaculturehub.org) members and registered individuals and institutions. Please visit our website (http://siamb.org.il) for free registration form, further information and instructions. This transformation from a subscription printed version to an on-line OA journal, aims at supporting the concept that scientific peer-reviewed publications should be made available to all, including those with limited resources. The OA IJA does not enforce author or subscription fees and will endeavor to obtain alternative sources of income to support this policy for as long as possible. Editor-in-Chief Published under auspices of Dan Mires The Society of Israeli Aquaculture and Marine Biotechnology (SIAMB), Editorial Board University of Hawaii at Manoa Library Sheenan Harpaz Agricultural Research Organization and Beit Dagan, Israel University of Hawaii Aquaculture Zvi Yaron Dept. of Zoology Program in association with Tel Aviv University AquacultureHub Tel Aviv, Israel http://www.aquaculturehub.org Angelo Colorni National Center for Mariculture, IOLR Eilat, Israel Rina Chakrabarti Aqua Research Lab Dept. of Zoology University of Delhi Ingrid Lupatsch Swansea University Singleton Park, Swansea, UK Jaap van Rijn The Hebrew University Faculty of Agriculture Israel Spencer Malecha Dept. of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences University of Hawaii Daniel Golani The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel Emilio Tibaldi Udine University Udine, Italy ISSN 0792 - 156X Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - BAMIGDEH. Copy Editor Ellen Rosenberg PUBLISHER: Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - BAMIGDEH - Kibbutz Ein Hamifratz, Mobile Post 25210, ISRAEL Phone: + 972 52 3965809 http://siamb.org.il The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh 59(2), 2007, 73-80.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Fishing Guide 2021
    Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Recreational fishing guide 2021 New rules apply from 1 July 2021 see page 3 for details Includes Statewide bag and size limits for Western Australia, and Recreational Fishing from Boat Licence information Published June 2021 Page i Important disclaimer The Director General of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. This publication is to provide assistance or information. It is only a guide and does not replace the Fish Resources Management Act 1994 or the Fish Resources Management Regulations 1995. It cannot be used as a defence in a court of law. The information provided is current at the date of printing but may be subject to change. For the most up-to-date information on fishing and full details of legislation contact select DPIRD offices or visit dpird.wa.gov.au Copyright © State of Western Australia (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development) 2021 Front cover photo: Tourism WA Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Gordon Stephenson House, 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 +61 1300 374 731 [email protected] dpird.wa.gov.au Page ii Contents Fish for the future .............................................2 Using this guide .................................................2 Changes to the rules – 2021 .............................3
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes Identification Guide for Chesmmap and NEAMAP Diet Analysis Studies
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 7-12-2011 Fishes Identification Guide for ChesMMAP and NEAMAP Diet Analysis Studies Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program. (2011) Fishes Identification Guide for ChesMMAP and NEAMAP Diet Analysis Studies. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://doi.org/10.25773/2yps-7w26 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fishes Identification Guide for ChesMMAP and NEAMAP Diet Analysis Studies Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program 7/12/11 This book is a compilation of identification resources for fishes found in stomach samples. By no means is it a complete list of all possible prey types. It is simply what has been found in past ChesMMAP and NEAMAP diet studies. A copy of this document is stored in both the ChesMMAP and NEAMAP lab network drives in a folder called ID Guides, along with other useful identification keys, articles, documents, and photos. If you want to see a larger version of any of the images in this document you can simply open the file and zoom in on the picture, or you can open the original file for the photo by navigating to the appropriate subfolder within the Fisheries Gut Lab folder.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 2 PSA Report for the Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery
    R04/1072 l 29/06/2007 Ecological Risk Assessment for Effects of Fishing REPORT FOR THE SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA PURSE SEINE SUB-FISHERY Authors Alistair Hobday Jo Dowdney Cathy Bulman Miriana Sporcic Mike Fuller Scott Ling i This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Commonwealth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without prior written permission from either CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research or AFMA. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. This fishery Ecological Risk Assessment report should be cited as: Hobday, A. J., J. Dowdney, C. Bulman, M. Sporcic, M. Fuller, S. Ling (2007) Ecological Risk Assessment for the Effects of Fishing: Southern Bluefin Tuna Purse Seine Fishery. Report for the Australian Fisheries Management Authority. Notes to this document: This fishery ERA report document contains figures and tables with numbers that correspond to the full methodology document for the ERAEF method: Hobday, A. J., A. Smith, H. Webb, R. Daley, S. Wayte, C. Bulman, J. Dowdney, A. Williams, M. Sporcic, J. Dambacher, M. Fuller, T. Walker. (2007) Ecological Risk Assessment for the Effects of Fishing: Methodology. Report R04/1072 for the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra Thus, table and figure numbers within the fishery ERA report document are not sequential as not all are relevant to the fishery ERA report results. Additional details on the rationale and the background to the methods development are contained in the ERAEF Final Report: Smith, A., A. Hobday, H. Webb, R. Daley, S. Wayte, C.
    [Show full text]