National Report on the Fish Stocks and Habitats of Regional, Global

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Report on the Fish Stocks and Habitats of Regional, Global United Nations UNEP/GEF South China Sea Global Environment Environment Programme Project Facility NATIONAL REPORT on The Fish Stocks and Habitats of Regional, Global, and Transboundary Significance in the South China Sea THAILAND Mr. Pirochana Saikliang Focal Point for Fisheries Chumphon Marine Fisheries Research and Development Center 408 Moo 8, Paknum Sub-District, Muang District, Chumphon 86120, Thailand NATIONAL REPORT ON FISHERIES – THAILAND Table of Contents 1. MARINE FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT........................................................................................2 / 1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE FISHERIES SECTOR ...................................................................................2 1.1.1 Total catch by fishing area, port of landing or province (by species/species group).7 1.1.2 Fishing effort by gear (no. of fishing days, or no. of boats) .......................................7 1.1.2.1 Trawl ...........................................................................................................10 1.1.2.2 Purse seine/ring net....................................................................................10 1.1.2.3 Gill net.........................................................................................................12 1.1.2.4 Other gears.................................................................................................12 1.1.3 Economic value of catch..........................................................................................14 1.1.4 Importance of the fisheries sector in terms of employment & dependence ............14 1.1.4.1 Contribution of the fisheries sector to GDP ................................................14 1.1.4.2 Contribution of the fishing industry to income and employment.................18 1.1.4.3 Contribution of the fisheries sector to foreign exchange earning ...............18 1.1.4.4 Contribution of the fishery sector to domestic nutrition ..............................19 2. SPECIES OF REGIONAL, GLOBAL AND/OR TRANSBOUNDARY SIGNIFICANCE.............20 2.1 RANKING OF IMPORTANCE IN TERMS OF LANDINGS, VALUE, AND STATUS..................................22 2.1.1 Landings (by site or province) (mt) ..........................................................................22 2.1.2 Local market value (Local currency, note year).......................................................22 2.1.3 Status (endangered, threatened, rare etc. IUCN criteria)........................................22 2.1.4 Food security (locally)..............................................................................................26 2.2 BIOLOGY & ECOLOGY OF THE PRIORITY SPECIES (FROM AVAILABLE INFORMATION) ..................26 2.2.1 Large pelagic fish (FAO)..........................................................................................26 2.2.2 Small pelagic fish species........................................................................................35 2.2.3 Demersal fish species..............................................................................................39 2.2.4 Commercially exploited invertebrates......................................................................46 3. THREATS & CURRENT STATUS..............................................................................................51 3.1 STATUS OF FISHERY IN TERMS OF CPUES ............................................................................51 3.2 STATUS OF FISH STOCKS BASED ON HISTORICAL REVIEW OF LANDINGS AND CPUES................52 3.3 THREATS .............................................................................................................................54 3.3.1 Current (e.g. destructive fishing practices, overfishing) ..........................................54 3.3.2 Potential (project market demand, increased coastal population)...........................56 4. HABITATS & AREAS OF IMPORTANCE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF EXPLOITED FISH STOCKS ............................................................................................................................56 4.1 THE PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GULF OF THAILAND .....56 4.1.1 Known spawning grounds........................................................................................57 4.1.2 Known nursery areas...............................................................................................60 4.1.3 Known fishing grounds ............................................................................................60 4.1.4 Seawater quality and pollutants...............................................................................61 4.1.5 Biological parameters ..............................................................................................61 4.1.6 Bottom sediment......................................................................................................63 4.2 UNKNOWN ISSUES SUCH AS STOCKS WITH UNDEFINED SPAWNING GROUNDS ...........................64 4.3 THREATS, CURRENT AND POTENTIAL (COASTAL DEVELOPMENT, POLLUTION, OIL SPILLS) ..........64 4.3.1 Coastal development ...............................................................................................64 4.3.2 Oil spills....................................................................................................................64 4.3.3 Pollution ...................................................................................................................64 4.3.4 Plankton blooms ......................................................................................................65 4.4 RANKING OF HABITATS .........................................................................................................67 4.4.1 Association with species of importance to food security .........................................67 4.4.2 Association with high value species ........................................................................67 4.4.3 Association with endangered, rare, threatened species..........................................68 ii NATIONAL REPORT ON FISHERIES – THAILAND 5. CURRENT MANAGEMENT REGIME(S) ...................................................................................68 5.1 LEGAL INSTRUMENTS ...........................................................................................................68 5.2 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS (RESEARCH, MONITORING, CONTROL & SURVEILLANCE)..........69 5.3 OVERVIEW OF PATTERNS OF RESOURCES OWNERSHIP AND TRADITIONAL UTILISATION .............70 5.4 HUMAN & INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY ......................................................................................71 5.5 REVIEW OF STAKEHOLDERS (E.G. FISHERS, NATIONAL AND/OR PROVINCIAL/LOCAL MANAGEMENT BODIES, NGOS) .............................................................................................72 6. PROBLEMS, CONSTRAINTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS............................................78 6.1 PROBLEMS AND CONSTRAINTS .............................................................................................78 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................79 7. REFERENCES............................................................................................................................80 APPENDEX 1 Rates of Exchange of Commercial Bank in Bangkok Metropolis APPENDEX 2 Extinct, Extinct in the Wild, Critically Endangered, Vulnerable, and Threatened Marine Species in Thailand APPENDEX 3 Fishes Found in Habitats of the Gulf of Thailand APPENDEX 4 The Organisational Structure of the Department of Fisheries (DOF) APPENDEX 5 The Organisational Structure of the Department of Marine and Coastal Resources (DMCR) iii NATIONAL REPORT ON FISHERIES – THAILAND 1 Fish Stocks & Habitats of Regional, Global, and Transboundary Significance in the South China Sea Case Study: Gulf of Thailand INTRODUCTION The Gulf of Thailand (Figure 1) covers an area of approximately 350,000km2. The Gulf is a shallow arm of the South China Sea, adjoining it over a distance of 200 nautical miles. It is approximately 450 nautical miles long, 300 nautical miles wide, with a maximum depth, in the central portion, of slightly more than 80m. The central depression extends for 60 nautical miles near Cape Liant at the southeast corner of the Bangkok Bight. The northeast coast is slightly shallower and flatter than the southwest coast. The deeper central Gulf is separated from the South China Sea by 2 ridges. The first has a depth of less than 25m and extends southwest for more than 60 nautical miles from the Cape of Camau (Robinson 1974). The other has a deeper ridge, less than 50 m, which extends northeast of Kota Bharu for a distance of 90 nautical miles. Subsequent to the Naga Expedition, a further regional bathymetric survey was conducted by the DODO expedition of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. In the narrow, deeper channel between the ridges, a still depth of 67 m was observed. These general features play an important role in regional oceanography. In general, the Gulf of Thailand is divided into 2 parts: 1. The Upper or Inner Gulf starts from latitude 12o30′N and extends up to the Chao Phraya Estuary, forming a U-shape. This 100x100km2 area, with an average water depth of 15m, can contain about 131km3 of water (calculated at the MSL). The northern part is shallow, gradually sloping to a depth of 25m near the opening between Sattahip, Chonburi province, and Hua Hin, Prachuap Khiri Khan province.
Recommended publications
  • View/Download
    SPARIFORMES · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 4.0 - 13 Feb. 2021 Order SPARIFORMES 3 families · 49 genera · 283 species/subspecies Family LETHRINIDAE Emporerfishes and Large-eye Breams 5 genera · 43 species Subfamily Lethrininae Emporerfishes Lethrinus Cuvier 1829 from lethrinia, ancient Greek name for members of the genus Pagellus (Sparidae) which Cuvier applied to this genus Lethrinus amboinensis Bleeker 1854 -ensis, suffix denoting place: Ambon Island, Molucca Islands, Indonesia, type locality (occurs in eastern Indian Ocean and western Pacific from Indonesia east to Marshall Islands and Samoa, north to Japan, south to Western Australia) Lethrinus atkinsoni Seale 1910 patronym not identified but probably in honor of William Sackston Atkinson (1864-ca. 1925), an illustrator who prepared the plates for a paper published by Seale in 1905 and presumably the plates in this 1910 paper as well Lethrinus atlanticus Valenciennes 1830 Atlantic, the only species of the genus (and family) known to occur in the Atlantic Lethrinus borbonicus Valenciennes 1830 -icus, belonging to: Borbon (or Bourbon), early name for Réunion island, western Mascarenes, type locality (occurs in Red Sea and western Indian Ocean from Persian Gulf and East Africa to Socotra, Seychelles, Madagascar, Réunion, and the Mascarenes) Lethrinus conchyliatus (Smith 1959) clothed in purple, etymology not explained, probably referring to “bright mauve” area at central basal part of pectoral fins on living specimens Lethrinus crocineus
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Odia: Dhudhiya Magara / Sorrah Magara / Haladia Magara
    FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka 2018 ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore, Kolkata - 700 120 (India) & Chilika Development Authority C- 11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751 014 (India) FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta, M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das, A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka Photo editing: Sujit Choudhury and Manavendra Roy ISBN: 978-81-938914-0-7 Citation: Suresh, et al. 2018. Fish and shellfish diversity and its sustainable management in Chilika lake, ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, Bhubaneswar. 376p. Copyright: © 2018. ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (CIFRI), Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holders. Photo credits: Sujit Choudhury, Manavendra Roy, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, V. R. Suresh, S. K. Karna, M. Mukherjee and Abdul Rasid Published by: Chief Executive Chilika Development Authority C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751 014 (Odisha) Cover design by: S. K. Mohanty Designed and printed by: S J Technotrade Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator/Prey Interactions, Competition, Multi
    Current understanding of trophic dynamics In the Mid-Atlantic Bluefish diets, Mid Atlantic and Southern New England, NEFSC surveys 100% All others All Flatfish 90% Unid fish Unid Unid fish Unid fish Unid fish Scup 80% Scup Unid fish Scup Bluefish Butterfish Bluefish 70% Mackerel Bluefish Butterfish Butterfish Hakes 60% Loligo Drums Butterfish Unid Squid Ocean pout Round herring 50% Butterfish Ctenophores Menhaden Loligo Loligo Loligo 40% Loligo Unid Squid Round herring Illex Bay anchovy Unid Squid Unid Squid Silver anchovy Round herring Round herring 30% Bay anchovy Menhaden Unid herring Bay anchovy Menhaden Bay anchovy Striped anchovy 20% Silver anchovy Unid anchovies Bay anchovy Striped anchovy Unid anchovies 10% Striped anchovy Unid anchovies Sand lances Unid anchovies Sand lances Sand lances Sand lances 0% 1977-86 1987-96 1997-2006 2007-2013 Food web models partition mortality 100% 90% 80% If Pred > F, 70% Pred Re-evaluate 60% constant M 50% 40% Proportion of total Mortality total Proportion of F 30% 20% 10% Proportion of total mortality total of Proportion 0% Longnose skate P. Halibut W. Pollock Squids Gaichas et al. 2010 Fishing Predation Other Link et al. 2008. The Northeast U.S. continental shelf Energy Modeling and Analysis exercise (EMAX): Ecological network model development and basic ecosystem metrics. Journal of Marine Systems 74: 453-474 Intermediate tactical multispecies models An intermediate-complexity tactical ecosystem assessment tool combines: Standard stock assessment Ecosystem considerations • Structured population
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020
    Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020 A team from the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries uses electrofishing to monitor invasive blue catfish in the James River in 2011. (Photo by Matt Rath/Chesapeake Bay Program) I. Introduction This management strategy portrays the outcomes of an interactive workshop (2020 Invasive Catfish Workshop) held by the Invasive Catfish Workgroup at the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Rice Rivers Center in Charles City, Virginia on January 29-30, 2020. The workshop convened a diverse group of stakeholders to share the current scientific understanding and priority issues associated with invasive catfishes in Chesapeake Bay. The perspectives shared and insights gained from the workshop were used to develop practical, synergistic recommendations that will improve management and mitigate impacts of these species across jurisdictions within the watershed. Blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) and flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris) are native to the Ohio, Missouri, Mississippi, and Rio Grande river basins, and were introduced into the Virginia tributaries of Chesapeake Bay in the 1960s and 1970s to establish a recreational fishery. These non-native species have since spread, inhabiting nearly all major tributaries of the Bay watershed. Rapid range expansion and population growth, particularly of blue catfish, have led to increasing concerns about impacts on the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. 1 Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy Invasive Catfish Blue and flathead catfishes are long-lived species that can negatively impact native species in Chesapeake Bay through predation and resource competition. Blue catfish are generalist feeders that prey on a wide variety of species that are locally abundant, including those of economic importance and conservation concern, such as blue crabs, alosines, Atlantic menhaden, American eels, and bay anchovy.
    [Show full text]
  • Trait Decoupling Promotes Evolutionary Diversification of The
    Trait decoupling promotes evolutionary diversification of the trophic and acoustic system of damselfishes rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Bruno Fre´de´rich1, Damien Olivier1, Glenn Litsios2,3, Michael E. Alfaro4 and Eric Parmentier1 1Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Applied and Fundamental Fish Research Center, Universite´ de Lie`ge, 4000 Lie`ge, Belgium 2Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Research 3Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Ge´nopode, Quartier Sorge, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA Cite this article: Fre´de´rich B, Olivier D, Litsios G, Alfaro ME, Parmentier E. 2014 Trait decou- Trait decoupling, wherein evolutionary release of constraints permits special- pling promotes evolutionary diversification of ization of formerly integrated structures, represents a major conceptual the trophic and acoustic system of damsel- framework for interpreting patterns of organismal diversity. However, few fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B 281: 20141047. empirical tests of this hypothesis exist. A central prediction, that the tempo of morphological evolution and ecological diversification should increase http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1047 following decoupling events, remains inadequately tested. In damselfishes (Pomacentridae), a ceratomandibular ligament links the hyoid bar and lower jaws, coupling two main morphofunctional units directly involved in both feeding and sound production. Here, we test the decoupling hypothesis Received: 2 May 2014 by examining the evolutionary consequences of the loss of the ceratomandib- Accepted: 9 June 2014 ular ligament in multiple damselfish lineages. As predicted, we find that rates of morphological evolution of trophic structures increased following the loss of the ligament.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Torrent Catfish, Liobagrus Hyeongsanensis (Teleostei: Siluriformes: Amblycipitidae), from Korea
    Zootaxa 4007 (1): 267–275 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4007.2.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60ABECAF-9687-4172-A309-D2222DFEC473 A new species of torrent catfish, Liobagrus hyeongsanensis (Teleostei: Siluriformes: Amblycipitidae), from Korea SU-HWAN KIM1, HYEONG-SU KIM2 & JONG-YOUNG PARK2,3 1National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon 325-813, South Korea 2Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, and Institute for Biodiversity Research, Chonbuk National Univer- sity, Jeonju 561-756, South Korea 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species of torrent catfish, Liobargus hyeongsanensis, is described from rivers and tributaries of the southeastern coast of Korea. The new species can be differentiated from its congeners by the following characteristics: a small size with a maximum standard length (SL) of 90 mm; body and fins entirely brownish-yellow without distinct markings; a relatively short pectoral spine (3.7–6.5 % SL); a reduced body-width at pectoral-fin base (15.5–17.9 % SL); 50–54 caudal-fin rays; 6–8 gill rakers; 2–3 (mostly 3) serrations on pectoral fin; 60–110 eggs per gravid female. Key words: Amblycipitidae, Liobagrus hyeongsanensis, New species, Endemic, South Korea Introduction Species of the family Amblycipitidae, which comprises four genera, are found in swift freshwater streams in southern and eastern Asia, ranging from Pakistan across northern India to Malaysia, Korea, and Southern Japan (Chen & Lundberg 1995; Ng & Kottelat 2000; Kim & Park 2002; Wright & Ng 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society
    ' <«» til 111 . JOURNAL OF THE BOMBAY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY Hornbill House, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, Mumbai 400 001 Executive Editor Asad R. Rahmani, Ph. D Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai Copy and Production Editor Vibhuti Dedhia, M. Sc. Editorial Board M.R. Almeida, D. Litt. T.C. Narendran, Ph. D., D. Sc. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai Professor, Department of Zoology, University of Calicut, Kerala Ajith Kumar, Ph. D. National Centre for Biological Sciences, GKVK Campus, Aasheesh Pittie, B. Com. Hebbal, Bangalore Bird Watchers Society of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad M.K. Chandrashekaran, Ph. D., D. Sc. Nehru Professor, Jawaharlal Centre G.S. Rawat, Ph. D. for Scientific Research, Advanced Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun Bangalore K. Rema Devi, Ph. D. Anwaruddin Choudhury, Ph. D., D. Sc. Zoological Survey of India, Chennai The Rhino Foundation for Nature, Guwahati J.S. Singh, Ph. D. Indraneil Das, D. Phil. Professor, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia, Sarawak, Malaysia S. Subramanya, Ph. D. University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, P.T. Cherian, Ph. D. Hebbal, Bangalore Emeritus Scientist, Department of Zoology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum R. Sukumar, Ph. D. Professor, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Y.V. Jhala, Ph. D. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore Wildlife Institute of India, Dehrdun K. Ullas Karanth, Ph. D. Romulus Whitaker, B Sc. Wildlife Conservation Society - India Program, Madras Reptile Park and Crocodile Bank Trust, Bangalore, Karnataka Tamil Nadu Senior Consultant Editor J.C. Daniel, M. Sc. Consultant Editors Raghunandan Chundawat, Ph. D. Wildlife Conservation Society, Bangalore Nigel Collar, Ph. D. BirdLife International, UK Rhys Green, Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • Pomacentridae): Structural and Expression Variation in Opsin Genes
    Molecular Ecology (2017) 26, 1323–1342 doi: 10.1111/mec.13968 Why UV vision and red vision are important for damselfish (Pomacentridae): structural and expression variation in opsin genes SARA M. STIEB,*† FABIO CORTESI,*† LORENZ SUEESS,* KAREN L. CARLETON,‡ WALTER SALZBURGER† and N. J. MARSHALL* *Sensory Neurobiology Group, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia, †Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel 4051, Switzerland, ‡Department of Biology, The University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA Abstract Coral reefs belong to the most diverse ecosystems on our planet. The diversity in col- oration and lifestyles of coral reef fishes makes them a particularly promising system to study the role of visual communication and adaptation. Here, we investigated the evolution of visual pigment genes (opsins) in damselfish (Pomacentridae) and exam- ined whether structural and expression variation of opsins can be linked to ecology. Using DNA sequence data of a phylogenetically representative set of 31 damselfish species, we show that all but one visual opsin are evolving under positive selection. In addition, selection on opsin tuning sites, including cases of divergent, parallel, conver- gent and reversed evolution, has been strong throughout the radiation of damselfish, emphasizing the importance of visual tuning for this group. The highest functional variation in opsin protein sequences was observed in the short- followed by the long- wavelength end of the visual spectrum. Comparative gene expression analyses of a subset of the same species revealed that with SWS1, RH2B and RH2A always being expressed, damselfish use an overall short-wavelength shifted expression profile. Inter- estingly, not only did all species express SWS1 – a UV-sensitive opsin – and possess UV-transmitting lenses, most species also feature UV-reflective body parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    Notes on the status of the names of fi shes presented in the Planches de Seba (1827-1831) published by Guérin-Méneville Paolo PARENTI Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, I-20126 Milano (Italy) [email protected] Martine DESOUTTER-MENIGER Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, USM 602, Taxonomie et Collections, case postale 26, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) [email protected] Parenti P. & Desoutter-Meniger M. 2007. — Notes on the status of the names of fi shes presented in the Planches de Seba (1827-1831) published by Guérin-Méneville. Zoosystema 29 (2) : 393-403. ABSTRACT Th e Planches de Seba were published in 48 issues (livraisons) between 1827 and 1831 under the direction of Guérin-Méneville. Livraison 13 contains two sheets (eight pages) of text dealing with plates 1 to 48 of volume 3 of Seba’s Locupletissimi rerum naturalium Th esauri (1759). Plates 23 through 34 depict fi shes. No types are known for these specimens. Examination of the text published in the Planches de Seba reveals the presence of 94 specifi c names of fi shes. Th e present status of each of them is reported. In particular, we found that 16 binomina represent original combinations and all but one (Anampses moniliger) have never been recorded in the ichthyological literature, with Planches de Seba as reference. Except for one name (Amphiprion albiventris), which is completely unknown in the literature, all other names bear the date of the original description of well established fi sh names.
    [Show full text]
  • DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DO Dnar EM CROMOSSOMOS DE PEIXES DA FAMÍLIA ELEOTRIDAE E REVISÃO CITOGENÉTICA DA ORDEM GOBIIFORMES(OSTEICHTHYES, TELEOSTEI)
    DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DO DNAr EM CROMOSSOMOS DE PEIXES DA FAMÍLIA ELEOTRIDAE E REVISÃO CITOGENÉTICA DA ORDEM GOBIIFORMES(OSTEICHTHYES, TELEOSTEI) SIMIÃO ALEFE SOARES DA SILVA ________________________________________________ Dissertação de Mestrado Natal/RN, Fevereiro de 2019 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE CENTRO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM SISTEMÁTICA E EVOLUÇÃO DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DO DNAr EM CROMOSSOMOS DE PEIXES DA FAMÍLIA ELEOTRIDAE E REVISÃO CITOGENÉTICA DA ORDEM GOBIIFORMES (OSTEICHTHYES, TELEOSTEI) Simião Alefe Soares da Silva Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemática e Evolução da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Sistemática e Evolução. Orientador: Dr. Wagner Franco Molina Co-Orientador: Dr. Paulo Augusto de Lima Filho Natal/RN 2019 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN Sistema de Bibliotecas - SISBI Catalogação de Publicação na Fonte. UFRN - Biblioteca Central Zila Mamede Silva, Simião Alefe Soares da. Dinâmica evolutiva do DNAr em cromossomos de peixes da família Eleotridae e revisão citogenética da ordem gobiiformes (Osteichthyes, Teleostei) / Simião Alefe Soares da Silva. - 2019. 69 f.: il. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Centro de Biociências, Programa de Pós-Graduação em 1. Evolução cromossômica - Dissertação. 2. Diversificação cariotípica - Dissertação. 3. Rearranjos cromossômicos - Dissertação. 4. DNAr - Dissertação. 5. Microssatélites - Dissertação. I. Lima Filho, Paulo Augusto de. II. Molina, Wagner Franco. III. Título. RN/UF/BCZM CDU 575:597.2/.5 SIMIÃO ALEFE SOARES DA SILVA DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DO DNAr EM CROMOSSOMOS DE PEIXES DA FAMÍLIA ELEOTRIDAE E REVISÃO CITOGENÉTICA DA ORDEM GOBIIFORMES (OSTEICHTHYES, TELEOSTEI) Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemática e Evolução da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, como requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Sistemática e Evolução com ênfase em Padrões e Processos Evolutivos.
    [Show full text]
  • Teleostei, Clupeiformes)
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Fall 2019 Global Conservation Status and Threat Patterns of the World’s Most Prominent Forage Fishes (Teleostei, Clupeiformes) Tiffany L. Birge Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Birge, Tiffany L.. "Global Conservation Status and Threat Patterns of the World’s Most Prominent Forage Fishes (Teleostei, Clupeiformes)" (2019). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/8m64-bg07 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/109 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLOBAL CONSERVATION STATUS AND THREAT PATTERNS OF THE WORLD’S MOST PROMINENT FORAGE FISHES (TELEOSTEI, CLUPEIFORMES) by Tiffany L. Birge A.S. May 2014, Tidewater Community College B.S. May 2016, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 2019 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Sara Maxwell (Member) Thomas Munroe (Member) ABSTRACT GLOBAL CONSERVATION STATUS AND THREAT PATTERNS OF THE WORLD’S MOST PROMINENT FORAGE FISHES (TELEOSTEI, CLUPEIFORMES) Tiffany L. Birge Old Dominion University, 2019 Advisor: Dr. Kent E.
    [Show full text]