DOCSLIB.ORG

Biology, Stock Status and Management Summaries for Selected Fish Species in South-Western Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biology, Stock Status and Management Summaries for Selected Fish Species in South-Western Australia Fisheries Research Report No. 242, 2013 Biology, stock status and management summaries for selected fish species in south-western Australia Claire B. Smallwood, S. Alex Hesp and Lynnath E. Beckley Fisheries Research Division Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories PO Box 20 NORTH BEACH, Western Australia 6920 Correct citation: Smallwood, C. B.; Hesp, S. A.; and Beckley, L. E. 2013. Biology, stock status and management summaries for selected fish species in south-western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 242. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. 180pp. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Fisheries Western Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Fisheries Western Australia does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Fish illustrations Illustrations © R. Swainston / www.anima.net.au We dedicate this guide to the memory of our friend and colleague, Ben Chuwen Department of Fisheries 3rd floor SGIO Atrium 168 – 170 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Telephone: (08) 9482 7333 Facsimile: (08) 9482 7389 Website: www.fish.wa.gov.au ABN: 55 689 794 771 Published by Department of Fisheries, Perth, Western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 242, March 2013. ISSN: 1035 - 4549 ISBN: 978-1-921845-56-7 ii Fisheries Research Report No.242, 2013 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 2 CRITERIA EVALUATED .................................................................................................. 4 ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................. 14 FISH SPECIES REPORTS ................................................................................................. 15 Cobbler (Cnidoglanis macrocephalus) .......................................................................... 15 Southern garfish(Hyporhamphus melanochir) ............................................................. 21 Bight redfish Centroberyx( gerrardi) ............................................................................. 26 Southern blue spotted flathead(Platycephalus speculator) ........................................... 31 Breaksea cod (Ephinephelides armatus) ........................................................................ 35 Harlequin fish(Othos dentex) ....................................................................................... 39 Eightbar grouper (Hyporthodus octofasciatus) ............................................................. 43 Hapuku (Polyprion oxygeneios) .................................................................................... 47 West Australian dhufish (Glaucosoma hebraicum) ....................................................... 52 Yellowfin whiting(Sillago schomburgkii) .................................................................... 59 King George whiting (Sillaginodes punctata) ............................................................... 64 Tailor (Pomatomus saltatrix) ......................................................................................... 70 Silver trevally (Pseudocaranx georgianus) .................................................................... 76 Samson fish(Seriola hippos) ......................................................................................... 82 Mahi mahi (Coryphaena hippurus) ................................................................................ 86 Western Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus) ............................................................ 92 Australian herring (Arripis georgianus) ........................................................................ 97 Black bream (Acanthopagrus butcheri) ......................................................................... 102 Pink snapper (Pagrus auratus) ....................................................................................... 110 Tarwhine (Rhabdosargus sarba) ................................................................................... 121 Mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus) ............................................................................ 126 Blue morwong (Nemadactylus valenciennesi) ............................................................. 132 Yelloweye mullet (Aldrichetta forsteri) ........................................................................ 136 Sea mullet (Mugil cephalus) .......................................................................................... 141 Western blue groper (Achoerodus gouldii) .................................................................. 148 Foxfish (Bodianus frenchii) .......................................................................................... 152 Brown spotted wrasse (Notolabrus parilus) .................................................................. 156 Baldchin groper (Choerodon rubescens) ....................................................................... 161 Blue-eye trevalla (Hyperoglyphe antarctica) ................................................................ 166 Banded toadfish(Torquigener pleurogramma) .............................................................. 171 Fisheries Research Report No.242, 2013 iii iv Fisheries Research Report No.242, 2013 Acknowledgements We are grateful to the following people who, collectively, provided detailed feedback on all the species summaries contained in this report. Thank you for sharing your extensive scientific knowledge of these species, which has greatly improved the quality and accuracy of this guide. • Joshua Brown (DoF) • Ben Chuwen (Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies) • Peter Coulson (Murdoch University) • Brett Crisafulli (Murdoch University) • David Fairclough (DoF) • Emily Fisher (Murdoch University) • Ben French (Murdoch University) • Glenn Hyndes (Edith Cowan University) • Gary Jackson (DoF) • Paul Lewis (DoF) • Brett Molony (DoF) • Ross Marriott (DoF) • Stephen Newman (DoF) • Ian Potter (Murdoch University) • Andrew Roland (Recfishwest) • Kim Smith (DoF) • Corey Wakefield (DoF) We are also grateful to Norm Hall, Lindsay Joll, Brett Molony and Brent Wise for valuable discussions relating to the development of this guide and for providing additional feedback on sections relating to fisheries management. We thank the following people who participated in the workshop held in June 2011 for their suggestions on improving the content and layout of the guide: Neil MacGuffie, Joshua Brown, Peter Coulson, Emily Fisher, Glenn Hyndes, Gary Jackson, Kane Moyle, Kevin Donohue and Elena Sulin. We gratefully acknowledge Murdoch University for providing seed funding for this project and the Australian Fisheries Research and Development Corporation for the financial support that enabled this guide to be developed. This guide was developed as part of FRDC project No. 2010/001, entitled "Predicting the impacts of shifting recreational fishing effort towards inshore species". Fisheries Research Report No.242, 2013 1 Introduction Objective Many people are interested in fishes, but often it can be difficult to access reliable information on the biology, status and management of a particular fish species. Although there is a long history of world class fisheries research and management in Australia, the full details are generally only available in a fragmented manner in various scientific journals, books and reports. In some cases, these sources of information can be difficult to find and, even for fisheries researchers and managers, who usually have access to scientific journals, certain types of information such as unpublished reports or student theses, can be hard to acquire. The first objective in developing this guide was thus to collate a range of important details relating to current biological understanding, stock status and management for 30 of Western Australia’s most important and/or well known, temperate marine fish species. The second objective was to provide a comprehensive list of publications relevant to each species, to enable easier access to more detailed information on those species. Features of the content and layout Given the large number of species of fish in temperate Western Australia (Wakefieldet al., in press), it is impossible to incorporate all of the recreationally and/or commercially important temperate fishes within this guide. With input from researchers and managers (Department of Fisheries, Murdoch University and Edith Cowan University) and other fishing industry stakeholders (Recfishwest and WAFIC) during a workshop held in June 2011, 30 of the most commonly-targeted and/or widely recognised temperate fish species in Western Australia were identified for inclusion in the guide. These include species caught by both the recreational and commercial sectors, and which, collectively, are found in estuaries and temperate marine ecosystems, i.e. in nearshore and offshore coastal waters, in the water column (pelagic) or near the sea-floor (demersal). The fish species have
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths (Ogrefish) by J.A
    click for previous page 1178 Bony Fishes Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths (ogrefish) by J.A. Moore, Florida Atlantic University, USA iagnostic characters: Small (to about 160 mm standard length) beryciform fishes.Body short, deep, and Dcompressed, tapering to narrow peduncle. Head large (1/3 standard length). Eye smaller than snout length in adults, but larger than snout length in juveniles. Mouth very large and oblique, jaws extend be- hind eye in adults; 1 supramaxilla. Bands of villiform teeth in juveniles are replaced with large fangs on dentary and premaxilla in adults; vomer and palatines toothless. Deep sensory canals separated by ser- rated ridges; very large parietal and preopercular spines in juveniles of one species, all disappearing with age. Gill rakers as clusters of teeth on gill arch in adults (lath-like in juveniles). No true fin spines; single, long-based dorsal fin with 16 to 20 rays; anal fin very short-based with 7 to 9 soft rays; caudal fin emarginate; pectoral fins with 13 to 16 soft rays; pelvic fins with 7 soft rays. Scales small, non-overlapping, spinose, goblet-shaped in adults; lateral line an open groove partially bridged by scales; no enlarged ventral keel scutes. Colour: entirely dark brown or black in adults. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Meso- to bathypelagic, at depths of 75 to 5 000 m. Carnivores, with juveniles feeding on mainly crustaceans and adults mainly on fishes. May sometimes swim in small groups. Uncommon deep-sea fishes of no commercial importance. Remarks: The family was revised recently by Kotlyar (1986) and contains 1 genus with 2 species throughout the tropical and temperate latitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights on the Sister Lineage of Percomorph Fishes with an Anchored Hybrid Enrichment Dataset
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 110 (2017) 27–38 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev New insights on the sister lineage of percomorph fishes with an anchored hybrid enrichment dataset ⇑ Alex Dornburg a, , Jeffrey P. Townsend b,c,d, Willa Brooks a, Elizabeth Spriggs b, Ron I. Eytan e, Jon A. Moore f,g, Peter C. Wainwright h, Alan Lemmon i, Emily Moriarty Lemmon j, Thomas J. Near b,k a North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, USA b Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA c Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA d Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA e Marine Biology Department, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77554, USA f Florida Atlantic University, Wilkes Honors College, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA g Florida Atlantic University, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Fort Pierce, FL 34946, USA h Department of Evolution & Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA i Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, 400 Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA j Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, 319 Stadium Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA k Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA article info abstract Article history: Percomorph fishes represent over 17,100 species, including several model organisms and species of eco- Received 12 April 2016 nomic importance. Despite continuous advances in the resolution of the percomorph Tree of Life, resolu- Revised 22 February 2017 tion of the sister lineage to Percomorpha remains inconsistent but restricted to a small number of Accepted 25 February 2017 candidate lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator/Prey Interactions, Competition, Multi
    Current understanding of trophic dynamics In the Mid-Atlantic Bluefish diets, Mid Atlantic and Southern New England, NEFSC surveys 100% All others All Flatfish 90% Unid fish Unid Unid fish Unid fish Unid fish Scup 80% Scup Unid fish Scup Bluefish Butterfish Bluefish 70% Mackerel Bluefish Butterfish Butterfish Hakes 60% Loligo Drums Butterfish Unid Squid Ocean pout Round herring 50% Butterfish Ctenophores Menhaden Loligo Loligo Loligo 40% Loligo Unid Squid Round herring Illex Bay anchovy Unid Squid Unid Squid Silver anchovy Round herring Round herring 30% Bay anchovy Menhaden Unid herring Bay anchovy Menhaden Bay anchovy Striped anchovy 20% Silver anchovy Unid anchovies Bay anchovy Striped anchovy Unid anchovies 10% Striped anchovy Unid anchovies Sand lances Unid anchovies Sand lances Sand lances Sand lances 0% 1977-86 1987-96 1997-2006 2007-2013 Food web models partition mortality 100% 90% 80% If Pred > F, 70% Pred Re-evaluate 60% constant M 50% 40% Proportion of total Mortality total Proportion of F 30% 20% 10% Proportion of total mortality total of Proportion 0% Longnose skate P. Halibut W. Pollock Squids Gaichas et al. 2010 Fishing Predation Other Link et al. 2008. The Northeast U.S. continental shelf Energy Modeling and Analysis exercise (EMAX): Ecological network model development and basic ecosystem metrics. Journal of Marine Systems 74: 453-474 Intermediate tactical multispecies models An intermediate-complexity tactical ecosystem assessment tool combines: Standard stock assessment Ecosystem considerations • Structured population
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between Faunal Assemblages and Habitat Types in Broke Inlet, Western Australia
    Relationships between faunal assemblages and habitat types in Broke Inlet, Western Australia Submitted by James Richard Tweedley This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2010 B.Sc (Hons) University of Portsmouth (UK) MRes University of Plymouth (UK) Declaration I declare that the information contained in this thesis is the result of my own research unless otherwise cited, and has as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any university. __________________________________________ James Richard Tweedley Shifting Sands: The sand bar at the mouth of Broke Inlet in (top) summer and (bottom) winter 2008. Bottom photo by Bryn Farmer. Abstract The work for this thesis was undertaken in Broke Inlet, a seasonally-open estuary on the south coast of Western Australia and the only estuary in that region which is regarded as “near-pristine” (Commonwealth of Australia, 2002). The only previous seasonal studies of the environmental and biotic characteristics of this estuary involved broad-based descriptions of the trends in salinity, temperature and ichthyofaunal characteristics at a limited number of sites. Furthermore, no attempt has been made to identify statistically the range of habitats present in the nearshore and offshore waters of this system, and the extents to which the characteristics of the fish and benthic invertebrate faunas are related to habitat type. These types of data provide not only reliable inventories of the habitat and faunal characteristics of Broke Inlet, but also a potential basis for predicting the likely impact of anthropogenic and climatic changes in Broke Inlet in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020
    Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020 A team from the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries uses electrofishing to monitor invasive blue catfish in the James River in 2011. (Photo by Matt Rath/Chesapeake Bay Program) I. Introduction This management strategy portrays the outcomes of an interactive workshop (2020 Invasive Catfish Workshop) held by the Invasive Catfish Workgroup at the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Rice Rivers Center in Charles City, Virginia on January 29-30, 2020. The workshop convened a diverse group of stakeholders to share the current scientific understanding and priority issues associated with invasive catfishes in Chesapeake Bay. The perspectives shared and insights gained from the workshop were used to develop practical, synergistic recommendations that will improve management and mitigate impacts of these species across jurisdictions within the watershed. Blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) and flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris) are native to the Ohio, Missouri, Mississippi, and Rio Grande river basins, and were introduced into the Virginia tributaries of Chesapeake Bay in the 1960s and 1970s to establish a recreational fishery. These non-native species have since spread, inhabiting nearly all major tributaries of the Bay watershed. Rapid range expansion and population growth, particularly of blue catfish, have led to increasing concerns about impacts on the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. 1 Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy Invasive Catfish Blue and flathead catfishes are long-lived species that can negatively impact native species in Chesapeake Bay through predation and resource competition. Blue catfish are generalist feeders that prey on a wide variety of species that are locally abundant, including those of economic importance and conservation concern, such as blue crabs, alosines, Atlantic menhaden, American eels, and bay anchovy.
    [Show full text]
  • Argyrosomus Regius), As an Emerging Species in Mediterranean Aquaculture
    GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN ISSN 1020-9549 STUDIES AND REVIEWS No. 89 2010 PRESENT MARKET SITUATION AND PROSPECTS OF MEAGRE (ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS), AS AN EMERGING SPECIES IN MEDITERRANEAN AQUACULTURE Cover photos and design: Front picture: Argyrosomus regius (courtesy of FAO) Background left to right: floating culture cages (courtesy of F. De Rossi); meagre head (courtesy of J.M. Caraballo); market size meagre cultured in Turkey (from Deniz, 2009); cultured meagre from Spain (courtesy of J.M. Caraballo). Cover design by F. De Rossi STUDIES AND REVIEWS No. 89 GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN PRESENT MARKET SITUATION AND PROSPECTS OF MEAGRE (ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS), AS AN EMERGING SPECIES IN MEDITERRANEAN AQUACULTURE by Marie Christine Monfort FAO Consultant FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-106605-8 All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product.
    [Show full text]
  • Congolli (Pseudaphritis Urvillii) and Australian Salmon (Arripis Truttaceus and A
    Inland Waters and Catchment Ecology Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 September 2015 Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 September 2015 II Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong This publication may be cited as: Giatas, G.C. and Ye, Q. (2015). Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 858. 81pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/research DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Growth Rate Variation Influence the Functional Relationship Between Somatic and Otolith Size
    Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Age and growth rate variation influence the functional relationship between somatic and otolith size Journal: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript ID cjfas-2015-0471.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 20-Jul-2016 Complete List of Authors: Ashworth, Eloise; Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences Hall, Norman; Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories,Draft Department of Fisheries Hesp, Alex; Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Fisheries Coulson, Peter; Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences Potter, Ian; Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences somatic and otolith growths, length-otolith size relationship, correlated Keyword: errors in variables, bivariate distribution, age and growth effects https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjfas-pubs Page 1 of 79 Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1 Age and growth rate variation influence the functional relationship 2 between somatic and otolith size 3 Eloïse C. Ashworth a, Norman G. Hall ab , S. Alex Hesp b, Peter G. Coulson a and Ian C. Potter a. 4 a 5 Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch 6 University, 90 South Street, Western Australia 6150, Australia. b 7 Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Fisheries, 8 Post Office Box 20, North Beach, Western Australia 6920, Australia. 9 10 Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjfas-pubs Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Page 2 of 79 11 Abstract 12 Curves describing the length-otolith size relationships for juveniles and adults of six fish 13 species with widely differing biological characteristics were fitted simultaneously to fish 14 length and otolith size at age, assuming that deviations from those curves are correlated rather 15 than independent.
    [Show full text]
  • Bodianus Prognathus (Labridae, Pisces), a New Longnose Hogfish from the Central Pacific!
    Pacific Science (1981), vol. 35, no. 1 © 1981 by The University Press of Hawaii. All rights reserved Bodianus prognathus (Labridae, Pisces), a New Longnose Hogfish from the Central Pacific! PHILLIP S. LOBEL2 ABSTRACT: Bodianus prognathus, a new species, is described from Fanning Atoll , Line Islands, Central Pacific. It is distinct from its congeners by having an extremely elongate snout. It resembles B . diana in color pattern. THE GENUS Bodianus of the labrid tribe of the dorsal fin. The width of the body was Hypsigenyini was recently revised by measured just behind the gills. Head length Gomon (1979). The description of Bodianus is from the tip of the upper lip to the end of prognathus herein brings the number of the opercular membrane. Snout length was known species of the genus to 29. This new measured from the anterior midpoint of the species is known only from Fanning Atoll , orbital rim to the tip of the upper lip. Upper Line Islands , Central Pacific (3°55' N, jaw length was measured from the most 159°23' W). It is unique within the genus in anterior end of the upper lip to the lower having a greatly elongated snout. Although posterior edge of the maxilla. The inter­ the configuration is overtly similar to that of orbital width is the bony width. The dia­ Gomphosus varius, also of the family Labri ­ meter of the orbit is the greatest inside dia­ dae, there is no doubt that B . prognathus is meter. The length of the caudal peduncle is allocated to the proper genus (Martin measured horizontally between verticals at Gomon, personal communication).
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]