DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlantic Sturgeon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlantic Sturgeon Vol. 24 - No. 3 Accredited by the American Association of Museums FALL 1 999 ATLANTIC STURGEON: GHOSTS FROM THE PAST A New Museum Exhibit Examines Their History and Ecology Ken Kaumeyer, Jimmy Langley, Stephen Godfrey, Skip Edwards, Laura Magdeburger, and Tim Scheirer n the earth's murky past, giant sturgeon roamed the ancient perished. Lacking nets, the settlers were able to catch the sturgeon seas during the age of the dinosaurs. Dating back seventy by hand as they waded in shallow water. I million years, and possibly twice that, sturgeon are relic fish Captain John Smith noted that between May and September which have changed lit tie over time. These huge fish, which can 1607 they lived upon sturgeon, sea crabs (probably horseshoe reach fifteen feet or more in length, survived the cataclysmic events crabs), and oysters. He wrote: "Wee had more Sturgeon then that destroyed the dinosaurs, but now face a very could be devoured by dogge or man; of which, the industrious by uncertain future due to a combination of drying and pownding, mingeled with caviare, sorrel and other human impacts and a curious life hearbs, would make bread and good meate." cycle. This article will describe Excavations at the recently discovered site of the briefly the sturgeon's long original Jamestown Fort demonstrate that journey through time, as well as sturgeon were a major source of food current efforts to save the few for the settlers, as substantial amounts remnants in the Chesapeake Bay. of sturgeon remains have been When the Chicxulub (Chic-za- unearthed. Sturgeon were lube) meteorite slammed into the extremely easy to capture in Yucatan Peninsula sixty-five million shallow water, being speared or years ago, it caused one of the greatest literally picked up by hand. This extinction events recorded in the fossil ease of capture, which allowed the record. For years after the impact, early settlers to survive, would prove the earth apparently became disastrous for the sturgeon two inhospitable for most life. All non- centuries later when they became avian dinosaurs, pterosaurs (flying one of the East Coast's most valuable reptiles), plesiosaurs (marine fisheries. The Jamestown Recovery reptiles), mosasaurs (giant marine Project of the Association for the lizards}, and a host of other Preservation of Virginia Antiquities terrestrial and aquatic organisms has been kind enough to loan several perished. Although we do not know fishery related artifacts recovered the exact details of this catastrophe, from the Jamestown Fort for CMM's the sky was darkened with exhibit. vaporized rock dust, temperatures CMM photo by Bob Hall Unlike the Plymouth colony, fluctuated widely, and the air which was established for the purpose of became acidic. How could sturgeon have survived in this terrible religious freedom, the Jamestown settlement was a commercial environment? One possible explanation is that adults have the venture, and the investors in England expected profits. Because ability to go several years without eating. Most likely they survived of the high cash value, the Jamestown settlers made several early on very limited food supplies while the earth's environment slowly attempts to produce caviar for exporl. These efforts were recovered. This theory is supported by the fact that another unsuccessful, however, as they did not know the proper procedure, survivor, horseshoe crabs, which have existed relatively unchanged and the caviar spoiled before reaching England. They soon turned for over four hundred million years, can also live for extended to the more profitable tobacco crop as a source of income. periods without food. Although sturgeon continued to be caught for personal Large numbers of fish, crabs, oysters, and waterfowl existed consumption, there was little effort to harvest them commercially in the Chesapeake Bay region when Europeans first arrived. for many years. Unfortunately, the first settlers at Jamestown in 1607 were not In the early nineteenth century, sturgeon were regarded as a prepared to take advanlage of these resources and nearly starved. terrible nuisance to fishermen. Early accounts note that the rivers If it were not for the abundant sturgeon they might well have (Continued on Page 6) 2 CALVERT MARINE MUSEUM'S STRONGEST FRIENDS, THE BUGEYE SOCIETY At every Calvert Marine Marine Museum's Bugeye Museum concert, inter- Society. Consider (he following: national dinner, reception and What can your commitment opening, at all the most lively bring to you in terms of a events produced for the greater forum to share museum, an 'inner circle' of resources and ideas? Can more business and community exposure to other corporate leaders can be found. These leaders in Southern Maryland honored guests are not only help your own business group? major museum donors, but Will the events and receptions volunteers, planners, event confirm your sense of administrators, and front line fellowship with people devoted workers as well. They are to preservation and education? Bugeye Society members. Can the Museum Society's The Bugeye Society, 501 (c)(3) designation ease your chartered in 1993, is the lax burden when you make a highest museum membership bigger contribution? And finally, level available. Each member does the idea of keeping the has agreed to the $1000 Chesapeake Bay region's enjoy the "Tropic Nights" evening evenl on }uly 24, shared heritage alive for tens of annual fee, with the CMM photo by Richard Dodo's understanding that Bugeye thousands of children and adult Society membership conveys visitors each year appeal to with it both tangible and intangible benefits. They also serve as museum ambassadors your sense of pride in our beautiful home? They've committed themselves to share by encouraging their peers in the Take these questions with you over the responsibility for maintaining and even community to join CMM and participate next few weeks, and please, contact us if enlarging museum programs and facilities. as fully as they do. you'd like more information before deciding They've assumed leadership when special Naturally, the CMM administration and to join. Your contribution may be the one fundraising efforts are called for, and have Board of Governors have gladly extended that makes Calvert Marine Museum's long- set a sterling example for the rest of us by premium benefits to thank the Bugeye term goals for Southern Maryland become giving not only funding assistance, but Society members in return for their realities. As a Bugeye Society member, business services, manpower, and important role. They are consistently you'll be in the best company this invaluable guidance at a moment's notice. recognized during VIP events, their names organization can offer. Cal! CMM director are carried within the text of our Bugeye Doug Alves or membership coordinator Ball and Waterside programs. They are also Vanessa Gill at (410) 326-2042 to be gratefully acknowledged by name on a counted among us. beautifully handcarved plaque in the Calvert Marine Museum Bugeye museum Exhibit Hall. Each is extended Quarterly Newsletter of the Society members include: Ted and Jennifer Calvert Marine Museum courtesy premium tickets for our major Stanley; Pat and Celeste Furey; Mr. and Mrs. and the Waterside Music concerts, and they enjoy Rick Bailey; Paul and Doris Berry; Baltimore Calvert Marine Museum Society, Inc. extensive facility use privileges and no-cost Gas and Electric; Direct Mail Group; Asbury (ISSN0887-651X) Wm. B. Tennison charters for cruising with Solomons; Solomons Landing; Barbara and C. Douglass Alves, Jr., Director friends or business associates. Paul L Berry, Editor Harold Gill; Ralph's Dodge of Prince Other contributors to this issue: Thanks to Bugeye Society partners, Frederick; Farmers Bank of Marylapd; Vanessa Gill, Lee Anne Wright Calvert Marine Museum enjoys a great deal Marianne and John Harms; Mimi The bugeye was the traditional bailing crafl of (he of support and commitment. Our reach into Lacouture; P. Chrisman Iribe & Family; Bay, and was built in all its glory at Solomons, the the Southern Maryland communities as well SMECO; George Tilghman; Electa and Lee "Bugeye Capital of the World." Membership clues as to the Mid-Atlantic region grows further Phillips; Mr. and Mrs. A.W. Zahniser 111; are used to fund special museum projects, programs, and printing of this newsletter. Address comrneiUs every year, in large part because Bugeye Isabellc Woodburn; Bill and Robin Fetsch; and membership applications to: Society resources have given us the Sheldon Seidel; W. Alan and Thelma Calvert Marine Museum Society, Inc. foundation we need. To belong to the Raffensperger; Mr. and Mrs. Josiah Rowe; P.O. Box 97 Bugeye Society is to become a part of that Amos Hutchins; Phyllis Laniz; Matt Solomons, MD 20688-0097 foundation, where members can network Gambrili; Solomons Veterinary Clinic; The 410-326-2042 FAX 4 10-326-6691 with one another in a private and Candace Milcarzyk Family; Carmen Nance TDD 41 0-535-6355 comfortable setting. Sanders; Holly Property Management We invite all of you to consider Calvert Corp. LLC; and Bell Atlantic. FALL 1999 The Wm. B. Tennison - Part II By Richard J. S. Dodds, Curator of Maritime History The previous issue of the Bugeye Times gave a historical overview of the museum's tour boat and floating exhibit, Wm. B. Tennison, on the occasion of her centennial. At the time, research into her history was still ongoing. The following are some of the highlights of this research that build on the work already done. The Builder Calvert Gazette, As mentioned in the previous May 7, 1887. article, the builder of the Tennison was Frank Laird of Monie in Somerset County (or to give him his full name, himself passed away in 1935. A staunch Benjamin Franklin Washington Laird). Methodist, he is buried in St. Peter's He was born near Crisfieldin 1851, the Church cemetery in Oriole.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Predator/Prey Interactions, Competition, Multi
    Current understanding of trophic dynamics In the Mid-Atlantic Bluefish diets, Mid Atlantic and Southern New England, NEFSC surveys 100% All others All Flatfish 90% Unid fish Unid Unid fish Unid fish Unid fish Scup 80% Scup Unid fish Scup Bluefish Butterfish Bluefish 70% Mackerel Bluefish Butterfish Butterfish Hakes 60% Loligo Drums Butterfish Unid Squid Ocean pout Round herring 50% Butterfish Ctenophores Menhaden Loligo Loligo Loligo 40% Loligo Unid Squid Round herring Illex Bay anchovy Unid Squid Unid Squid Silver anchovy Round herring Round herring 30% Bay anchovy Menhaden Unid herring Bay anchovy Menhaden Bay anchovy Striped anchovy 20% Silver anchovy Unid anchovies Bay anchovy Striped anchovy Unid anchovies 10% Striped anchovy Unid anchovies Sand lances Unid anchovies Sand lances Sand lances Sand lances 0% 1977-86 1987-96 1997-2006 2007-2013 Food web models partition mortality 100% 90% 80% If Pred > F, 70% Pred Re-evaluate 60% constant M 50% 40% Proportion of total Mortality total Proportion of F 30% 20% 10% Proportion of total mortality total of Proportion 0% Longnose skate P. Halibut W. Pollock Squids Gaichas et al. 2010 Fishing Predation Other Link et al. 2008. The Northeast U.S. continental shelf Energy Modeling and Analysis exercise (EMAX): Ecological network model development and basic ecosystem metrics. Journal of Marine Systems 74: 453-474 Intermediate tactical multispecies models An intermediate-complexity tactical ecosystem assessment tool combines: Standard stock assessment Ecosystem considerations • Structured population
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020
    Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020 A team from the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries uses electrofishing to monitor invasive blue catfish in the James River in 2011. (Photo by Matt Rath/Chesapeake Bay Program) I. Introduction This management strategy portrays the outcomes of an interactive workshop (2020 Invasive Catfish Workshop) held by the Invasive Catfish Workgroup at the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Rice Rivers Center in Charles City, Virginia on January 29-30, 2020. The workshop convened a diverse group of stakeholders to share the current scientific understanding and priority issues associated with invasive catfishes in Chesapeake Bay. The perspectives shared and insights gained from the workshop were used to develop practical, synergistic recommendations that will improve management and mitigate impacts of these species across jurisdictions within the watershed. Blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) and flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris) are native to the Ohio, Missouri, Mississippi, and Rio Grande river basins, and were introduced into the Virginia tributaries of Chesapeake Bay in the 1960s and 1970s to establish a recreational fishery. These non-native species have since spread, inhabiting nearly all major tributaries of the Bay watershed. Rapid range expansion and population growth, particularly of blue catfish, have led to increasing concerns about impacts on the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. 1 Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy Invasive Catfish Blue and flathead catfishes are long-lived species that can negatively impact native species in Chesapeake Bay through predation and resource competition. Blue catfish are generalist feeders that prey on a wide variety of species that are locally abundant, including those of economic importance and conservation concern, such as blue crabs, alosines, Atlantic menhaden, American eels, and bay anchovy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Atlantic Forage Species ID Guide
    Mid-Atlantic Forage Species Identification Guide Forage Species Identification Guide Basic Morphology Dorsal fin Lateral line Caudal fin This guide provides descriptions and These species are subject to the codes for the forage species that vessels combined 1,700-pound trip limit: Opercle and dealers are required to report under Operculum • Anchovies the Mid-Atlantic Council’s Unmanaged Forage Omnibus Amendment. Find out • Argentines/Smelt Herring more about the amendment at: • Greeneyes Pectoral fin www.mafmc.org/forage. • Halfbeaks Pelvic fin Anal fin Caudal peduncle All federally permitted vessels fishing • Lanternfishes in the Mid-Atlantic Forage Species Dorsal Right (lateral) side Management Unit and dealers are • Round Herring required to report catch and landings of • Scaled Sardine the forage species listed to the right. All species listed in this guide are subject • Atlantic Thread Herring Anterior Posterior to the 1,700-pound trip limit unless • Spanish Sardine stated otherwise. • Pearlsides/Deepsea Hatchetfish • Sand Lances Left (lateral) side Ventral • Silversides • Cusk-eels Using the Guide • Atlantic Saury • Use the images and descriptions to identify species. • Unclassified Mollusks (Unmanaged Squids, Pteropods) • Report catch and sale of these species using the VTR code (red bubble) for • Other Crustaceans/Shellfish logbooks, or the common name (dark (Copepods, Krill, Amphipods) blue bubble) for dealer reports. 2 These species are subject to the combined 1,700-pound trip limit: • Anchovies • Argentines/Smelt Herring •
    [Show full text]
  • Fish for Your Health™ Advice for Pregnant Or Nursing Women, Women That Will Become Pregnant, and Children Under 6 Years of Age
    Fish for Your Health™ Advice for pregnant or nursing women, women that will become pregnant, and children under 6 years of age 1. Eat fish – Health experts recommend that women eat 8-12 ounces/week (weight before cooking) of fish. Children, ages 2-6, should eat at least 2 ounces/week. As a reference, 3 ounces of fish is about the size of a deck of cards. Women that eat fish which contains omega-3 fatty acids (EPA & DHA) will pass these nutrients to their babies and support healthy brain and eye development. Best Choices: Eating six ounces/week of the following fish provides the recommended amounts of healthy fats and will minimize your baby’s exposure to pollutants: salmon (wild or farm-raised), rainbow trout (farm-raised), herring, mackerel (Atlantic, Jack, chub), sardine, shad (American), whitefish. 2. Before eating recreationally-caught fish, check our Fish4Health website below for your State’s fish consumption advisory and avoid eating fish that is heavily contaminated with pollutants. If a fish that you caught is not listed in the advisory, then eat no more than 1 meal per month. If you are unsure about the safety of the fish that you caught, be safe - ‘catch-and-release’. 3. Minimize your exposure to pollutants in commercial fish - follow the advice given below. (Ex: If you eat 4 ounces of albacore tuna, then don’t eat any other fish from this category until the following week.) Level of Maximum Mercury Amount for Commercial Fish Species or PCBs** Adults to Eat anchovy, butterfish, catfish (farm-raised), clam, cod, crab (Blue, King
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 14 STOCK ASSESSMENT of PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA (Thunnus
    FINAL ISC/18/ANNEX/14 ANNEX 14 18th Meeting of the International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-Like Species in the North Pacific Ocean Yeosu, Republic of Korea July 11-16, 2018 STOCK ASSESSMENT OF PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA (Thunnus orientalis) IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN IN 2018 REPORT OF THE PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA WORKING GROUP July 2018 1 FINAL Left Blank for Printing FINAL Table of Contents 2018 Pacific Bluefin Tuna Stock Assessment ...........................................................................5 ISC PBFWG ...............................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAY 2018 ....................................................................................5 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................24 2.0 BACKGROUND ON BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES .......................................................25 2.1 Biology ...................................................................................................... 25 2.1.1 Stock Structure .............................................................................................. 25 2.1.2 Reproduction .................................................................................................. 25 2.1.3 Distribution and Movements ........................................................................ 25 2.1.4 Growth ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Updated Standardized CPUE of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Caught
    SCRS/08/100 Updated standardized CPUE of Atlantic bluefin tuna caught by the Spanish baitboat fishery in the Bay of Biscay (Eastern Atlantic). Time series from 1975 to 2007. Enrique Rodriguez-Marin1, Mauricio Ortiz2, Cristina Rodríguez-Cabello1 and Santiago Barreiro1 SUMMARY Updated standardized relative abundance indices by age are presented for bluefin tuna baitboat fishery in the Bay of Biscay from 1975 to 2007. Standardization was carried out using generalized linear mixed models. Catch and effort data on bluefin tuna were available from catches by trip; this catch by commercial category was converted to catch at age by applying seasonal age length keys to the length distribution by commercial category. In this update the age length keys of summer of the entire study period were reviewed. Age class was included as a fixed factor within model specifications because the fishery operates on all available stock fractions, and age determination of the tuna landings is done after removal of the catch. Splitting of the catches into age classes introduces a large number of zero values, so data were modeled using the delta- lognormal model. The model finally selected included the following explanatory factors: Year, Age, Month and Year × Age fixed factors, plus a selection of other factors contributing with a significant percentage of the total explained deviance in the aggregated model. All Year interactions besides the Year × Age factor were considered as random. CVs of present standardized index are less variable than the previous standardization time series from 1975 to 2004, but still some variability was found for the last years when the vessels built more recently and larger are included in the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Secretary of Commerce Petition to List the Pacific Bluefin Tuna
    Credit: aes256 [CC BY 2.1 jp] via Wikimedia Commons Before the Secretary of Commerce Petition to List the Pacific Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus orientalis) as Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act June 20, 2016 6/20/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Petitioners formally request that the Secretary of Commerce, through the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), list the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) as endangered or in the alternative list the species as threatened, under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 – 1544. Pacific bluefin tuna are severely overfished, and overfishing continues, making extinction a very real risk. According to the 2016 stock assessment by the International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-Like Species in the North Pacific Ocean (ISC), decades of overfishing have left the population at just 2.6% of its unfished size. Recent fishing rates (2011-2013) were up to three times higher than commonly used reference points for overfishing. The population’s severe decline, in combination with inadequate regulatory mechanisms to end overfishing or reverse the decline, has pushed Pacific bluefin tuna to the edge of extinction. Pacific bluefin tuna are important apex predators in the marine ecosystem and must be conserved. They are one of three bluefin tuna species. These three species are renowned for their large size, unique physiology and biomechanics, and capacity to swim across ocean basins. They are slow-growing, long-lived, endothermic fish. The Pacific bluefin migrates tens of thousands of miles across the largest ocean to feed and spawn, ranging from waters north of Japan to New Zealand in the western Pacific and off California and Mexico in the eastern Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Stock Status and Management Summaries for Selected Fish Species in South-Western Australia
    Fisheries Research Report No. 242, 2013 Biology, stock status and management summaries for selected fish species in south-western Australia Claire B. Smallwood, S. Alex Hesp and Lynnath E. Beckley Fisheries Research Division Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories PO Box 20 NORTH BEACH, Western Australia 6920 Correct citation: Smallwood, C. B.; Hesp, S. A.; and Beckley, L. E. 2013. Biology, stock status and management summaries for selected fish species in south-western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 242. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. 180pp. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Fisheries Western Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Fisheries Western Australia does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Fish illustrations Illustrations © R. Swainston / www.anima.net.au We dedicate this guide to the memory of our friend and colleague, Ben Chuwen Department of Fisheries 3rd floor SGIO Atrium 168 – 170 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Telephone: (08) 9482 7333 Facsimile: (08) 9482 7389 Website: www.fish.wa.gov.au ABN: 55 689 794 771 Published by Department of Fisheries, Perth, Western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 242, March 2013. ISSN: 1035 - 4549 ISBN: 978-1-921845-56-7 ii Fisheries Research Report No.242, 2013 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Access Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh
    The Open Access Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh As from January 2010 The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh (IJA) will be published exclusively as an on-line Open Access (OA) quarterly accessible by all AquacultureHub (http://www.aquaculturehub.org) members and registered individuals and institutions. Please visit our website (http://siamb.org.il) for free registration form, further information and instructions. This transformation from a subscription printed version to an on-line OA journal, aims at supporting the concept that scientific peer-reviewed publications should be made available to all, including those with limited resources. The OA IJA does not enforce author or subscription fees and will endeavor to obtain alternative sources of income to support this policy for as long as possible. Editor-in-Chief Published under auspices of Dan Mires The Society of Israeli Aquaculture and Marine Biotechnology (SIAMB), Editorial Board University of Hawaii at Manoa Library Sheenan Harpaz Agricultural Research Organization and Beit Dagan, Israel University of Hawaii Aquaculture Zvi Yaron Dept. of Zoology Program in association with Tel Aviv University AquacultureHub Tel Aviv, Israel http://www.aquaculturehub.org Angelo Colorni National Center for Mariculture, IOLR Eilat, Israel Rina Chakrabarti Aqua Research Lab Dept. of Zoology University of Delhi Ingrid Lupatsch Swansea University Singleton Park, Swansea, UK Jaap van Rijn The Hebrew University Faculty of Agriculture Israel Spencer Malecha Dept. of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences University of Hawaii Daniel Golani The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel Emilio Tibaldi Udine University Udine, Italy ISSN 0792 - 156X Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - BAMIGDEH. Copy Editor Ellen Rosenberg PUBLISHER: Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - BAMIGDEH - Kibbutz Ein Hamifratz, Mobile Post 25210, ISRAEL Phone: + 972 52 3965809 http://siamb.org.il The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh 59(2), 2007, 73-80.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Fishing Guide 2021
    Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Recreational fishing guide 2021 New rules apply from 1 July 2021 see page 3 for details Includes Statewide bag and size limits for Western Australia, and Recreational Fishing from Boat Licence information Published June 2021 Page i Important disclaimer The Director General of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. This publication is to provide assistance or information. It is only a guide and does not replace the Fish Resources Management Act 1994 or the Fish Resources Management Regulations 1995. It cannot be used as a defence in a court of law. The information provided is current at the date of printing but may be subject to change. For the most up-to-date information on fishing and full details of legislation contact select DPIRD offices or visit dpird.wa.gov.au Copyright © State of Western Australia (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development) 2021 Front cover photo: Tourism WA Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Gordon Stephenson House, 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 +61 1300 374 731 [email protected] dpird.wa.gov.au Page ii Contents Fish for the future .............................................2 Using this guide .................................................2 Changes to the rules – 2021 .............................3
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes Identification Guide for Chesmmap and NEAMAP Diet Analysis Studies
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 7-12-2011 Fishes Identification Guide for ChesMMAP and NEAMAP Diet Analysis Studies Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program. (2011) Fishes Identification Guide for ChesMMAP and NEAMAP Diet Analysis Studies. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://doi.org/10.25773/2yps-7w26 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fishes Identification Guide for ChesMMAP and NEAMAP Diet Analysis Studies Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program 7/12/11 This book is a compilation of identification resources for fishes found in stomach samples. By no means is it a complete list of all possible prey types. It is simply what has been found in past ChesMMAP and NEAMAP diet studies. A copy of this document is stored in both the ChesMMAP and NEAMAP lab network drives in a folder called ID Guides, along with other useful identification keys, articles, documents, and photos. If you want to see a larger version of any of the images in this document you can simply open the file and zoom in on the picture, or you can open the original file for the photo by navigating to the appropriate subfolder within the Fisheries Gut Lab folder.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 2 PSA Report for the Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery
    R04/1072 l 29/06/2007 Ecological Risk Assessment for Effects of Fishing REPORT FOR THE SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA PURSE SEINE SUB-FISHERY Authors Alistair Hobday Jo Dowdney Cathy Bulman Miriana Sporcic Mike Fuller Scott Ling i This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Commonwealth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without prior written permission from either CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research or AFMA. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. This fishery Ecological Risk Assessment report should be cited as: Hobday, A. J., J. Dowdney, C. Bulman, M. Sporcic, M. Fuller, S. Ling (2007) Ecological Risk Assessment for the Effects of Fishing: Southern Bluefin Tuna Purse Seine Fishery. Report for the Australian Fisheries Management Authority. Notes to this document: This fishery ERA report document contains figures and tables with numbers that correspond to the full methodology document for the ERAEF method: Hobday, A. J., A. Smith, H. Webb, R. Daley, S. Wayte, C. Bulman, J. Dowdney, A. Williams, M. Sporcic, J. Dambacher, M. Fuller, T. Walker. (2007) Ecological Risk Assessment for the Effects of Fishing: Methodology. Report R04/1072 for the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra Thus, table and figure numbers within the fishery ERA report document are not sequential as not all are relevant to the fishery ERA report results. Additional details on the rationale and the background to the methods development are contained in the ERAEF Final Report: Smith, A., A. Hobday, H. Webb, R. Daley, S. Wayte, C.
    [Show full text]