DOCSLIB.ORG

Hybridization Between Asclepias Purpurascens and Asclepias Syriaca (Apocynaceae): a Cause for Concern?1 Steven B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hybridization Between Asclepias Purpurascens and Asclepias Syriaca (Apocynaceae): a Cause for Concern?1 Steven B Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 146(4): 278–290, 2019. Hybridization between Asclepias purpurascens and Asclepias syriaca (Apocynaceae): A cause for concern?1 Steven B. Broyles2,4 and Geordie Elkins3 2Biological Sciences Department, SUNY Cortland, Cortland, NY 13045 and 3Highstead, 127 Lonetown Road, Redding, CT 06896 Abstract. Rare plant species can be at risk of hybridization, reduced genetic variation, and genetic assimilation when a numerically abundant congener co-occurs in or invades their habitat. We investigated hybridization between a species in decline, Asclepias purpurascens L., and its common and widespread congener, Asclepias syriaca L. A total of 40 morphological traits were measured on 60 flowering plants from a mixed population in Connecticut. Cluster and principal component analyses identified two distinct clusters of parental species taxa and a third cluster representing putative hybrids. Although leaf traits of putative hybrids were more similar to A. syriaca, floral traits and the morphological space on the principal component analysis were more similar to A. purpurascens. This suggests that the population contains a mix of F1 and advanced generation hybrids with the possibility of introgression into A. purpurascens. Although putative hybrids are intermediate for most traits, pollen counts reveal reduced fertility of presumed hybrid that might influence mating behaviors and increase the likelihood of backcrossing with A. purpurascens. We suggest a combination of morphological traits that better identify the two parental species as well as hybrids in the field. Conservationists should consider options of managing A. syriaca where A. purpurascens needs protection from competition to prevent genetic assimilation of the latter. Key words: Asclepias, conservation, hybridization Angiosperms abound with natural and anthro- 2015). Hybridization can threaten the rare species pogenic hybrid taxa as a result of circumventing through the loss of genetic diversity and the pre- and postzygotic reproductive barriers (Baack breakdown of coadapted gene complexes (Reise- et al. 2015). Hybrid taxa can become bridges for berg, 1991). On the other hand, in extreme cases, transgressing genetic traits between species and hybridization can serve as a rescue method for affect the process of ecological adaptation and reinvigorating a threatened species with an infu- evolution in one or both parental species (Arnold sion of new genetic variation (Hamilton and Miller 1992). Hybridization between small endemic or 2015; Suarez-Gonzalez, Lexer, and Cronk 2018). rare populations with those numerically abundant, Natural hybridization was initially regarded as rare between milkweed species (Moore 1946; widespread, and common, can promote more rapid Woodson 1954), but a growing body of evidence evolution by genetic introgression than would suggests that hybrid formation (Wyatt and Broyles occur through other natural processes such as 1994) and perhaps introgression (Broyles 2002) mutation, genetic drift, and recombination (Harri- does occur between some sympatric taxa. For son and Larsen 2014). Hybridization can impose a example, the widespread, weedy Asclepias syriaca conservation dilemma to land managers, because has been reported to hybridize with the prairie hybrid taxa in some countries do not hold species, A. sullivantii Engelm. ex A. Gray, in Ohio conservation status in environmental laws (Ell- (Klips and Culley 2004) and Asclepias speciosa strand et al. 2010; Jackiw, Mandil, and Hager Torr. (Adams, Toomb, and Price 1987) in prairie states, as well as the infrequent woodland species, 1 We thank Jesse Hubbard and Amanda Hewes for Asclepias exaltata L. Authority (Kephart, Wyatt, providing field assistance, and Tessa Brown, Mia and Parrella 1988). In the latter case, pollinator DiMartino, Sarah Jensen, and Sophie Whittington for laboratory assistance. Sue Sherman-Broyles provided sharing (Broyles, Vail, and Sherman-Broyles 1996; useful comments on the manuscript. This research was Stoepler et al. 2012) gives rise to hybrid formation supported by NSF grant number 1645256, G. Jander, PI. and interspecific gene flow between A. syriaca and 4 Author for correspondence: steven.broyles@ A. exaltata (Broyles 2002). cortland.edu For several decades, milkweeds were regarded doi 10.3159/TORREY-D-18-00050.1 as an exemplar for mechanical reproductive ÓCopyright 2019 by The Torrey Botanical Society Received for publication September 21, 2019, and in isolation in plants. The size and depth of the revised form March 22, 2019; first published October 23, stigmatic chamber appears to be adapted to the size 2019. of conspecific pollinia. A pollinium of large 278 Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/The-Journal-of-the-Torrey-Botanical-Society on 10 Dec 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by Harvard University 2019] BROYLES AND ELKINS: HYBRIDIZATION IN MILKWEEDS 279 TABLE 1. Characters used to distinguish A. syriaca and A. purpurascens in floras of the eastern United States. A. syriaca A. purpurascens Manual of the Vascular Flora of ‘‘Hood margin with single median ‘‘Hood margin without a median the Carolinas (Radford, Ahles, triangular tooth; follicles muricate’’ tooth; follicles smooth’’ and Bell 1968) Flora Novae Angliae (Haines ‘‘Corona hoods 4–5 mm long, light ‘‘Corona hoods 5–7 mm long, red- 2011) purple, each with prominent purple to purple, without marginal marginal lobe near the center; lobes; follicles smooth; corolla red- follicles covered with conical purple to purple’’ processes; corolla purple green to light purple’’ Manual of Vascular Plants of ‘‘Hoods with a sharp, triangular, ‘‘Hoods without lateral lobes, or Northeastern United States and ascending or inflexed lateral lobe merely slightly widened at or near Adjacent Canada (Gleason and at or near the middle of the the middle; cor commonly purple’’ Cronquist 1991) margin; cor greenish-purple to nearly white’’ Additional features to consider Hoods without lateral protuberance Hoods with lateral protuberance and and median margins with an lacking median margin tooth; ascending tooth; pedicels thin pedicels thick resulting in erect resulting in loose globose flowers forming a inflorescence; abaxial surface of semihemispherical inflorescence; petals pubescent. abaxial surface of petals glabrous. proportions is unlikely to be deposited in small hybrid plant, but the hoods appear elongated and stigmatic chambers of other milkweed species, and it is difficult to determine if the flowers had median the small pollinia with many fewer pollen grains hood teeth. The flower and fruit photographs of are less likely to successfully sire a fruit with Rintz’s putative hybrid actually bear many char- complete seed set on larger species. This ‘‘lock and acteristics (i.e., stiff pedicels with erect flowers, key’’ hypothesis lacks support because examina- elongated hoods, distinct lateral hood protuberanc- tion of field pollinations has illustrated that es, and smooth fruits) more reminiscent of A. interspecific pollinations frequently occur between purpurascens than A. syriaca. A more thorough congeneric milkweeds (Kephart and Heiser 1980; analysis of morphological traits in a sympatric Broyles, Vail, and Sherman-Broyles 1996; Stoep- population of the two species is warranted. fler et al. 2012). Furthermore, morphological, Biochemical evidence from leaf tissue of plants isozyme, biochemical, and genetic evidence have in central Virginia (Wyatt and Hunt 1991) suggests demonstrated that hybridization is more common that hybridization can occur between A. purpur- than originally proposed in milkweeds (Kephart, ascens and A. syriaca. Wyatt and Hunt pooled leaf Wyatt, and Parrella 1988; Wyatt and Broyles 1992; material from several putative hybrids in central Broyles 2002; Klips and Culley 2004). Virginia and demonstrated that leaf flavonoids of Hybridization between the declining Asclepias the hybrids represented an admixture of the two purpurascens and common A. syriaca has been parental species. In addition, they found two novel suggested using flavonoid chemistry in Virginia flavonoids that were absent in the parents. This (Wyatt and Hunt 1991) and a report on a single biochemical study does suggest that hybridization specimen in Missouri (Rintz 2014). Field identi- with A. syriaca is possible, but it does not provide fication of hybrids is difficult using morphological guidance in the recognition of hybridizing popu- traits. Many eastern floras and identification guides lations. (Table 1) use flower hood length and the presence/ The ranges of Asclepias purpurascens and A. absence of marginal teeth along the hood as syriaca overlap in the midwestern and eastern features to distinguish the two species, but hood United States. Asclepias syriaca is considered a length is highly variable for A. syriaca, and finding weedy species found in urban waste areas, hood teeth is difficult even with a good hand lens. roadsides, and agricultural areas, as well as prairies For example, Rintz’s (2014) report from Missouri and sand dunes. Asclepias purpurascens occurs in is based on a single, unmeasured specimen. Rintz dry and moist prairies, meadows, and woodland published a color photograph of the putative edges in the Midwest and eastern North America. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/The-Journal-of-the-Torrey-Botanical-Society on 10 Dec 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by Harvard University 280 JOURNAL OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL SOCIETY [VOL. 146 Asclepias
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bwsr Featured Plant Minnesota's Milkweeds
    BWSR FEATURED PLANT MINNESOTA’S MILKWEEDS Publication Date: 6‐1‐13 Milkweeds play a key role in wetlands, prairies, savannas and forests in Minnesota. The genus (Asclepias) is particularly important as a nectar and larval food source for a wide range of insect species. The best known example is the monarch butterfly whose larvae appear to feed only on milkweeds. Milkweeds have a unique pollination mechanism where pollen grains are enclosed in waxy sacs called “pollina” that attach to the legs of butterflies, moths, bees, ants and wasps and are then deposited in another milkweed flower if they step into a specialized anther opening. Most milkweeds are toxic to vertebrate herbivores due to cardiac glycosides that are in their plant cells. In addition to supporting insect populations, Butterfly Milkweed milkweeds also provide other landscape benefits due to their extensive root systems (sometimes deep roots, sometimes horizontal) that Photos by Dave Hanson decrease compaction, add organic material to the soil and improve unless otherwise stated water infiltration. Common milkweed is probably the best known milkweed species as it is found in all counties of the state and was included on some county prohibited noxious weed lists. The species was considered a common agricultural weed as its extensive root network made it difficult to remove from agricultural fields with cultivators. Now the species is effectively removed from genetically modified corn and soybean fields that are sprayed with herbicide. This practice has contributed to significant declines in milkweed species, with an estimated 58% decline in the Midwest between 1999 and 2010 and a corresponding 81% decline in monarch butterfly production (Pleasants & Oberhauser, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization Between Asclepias Purpurascens and Asclepias Syriaca (Apocynaceae): a Cause for Concern?1
    Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 146(4): 278–290, 2019. Hybridization between Asclepias purpurascens and Asclepias syriaca (Apocynaceae): A cause for concern?1 Steven B. Broyles2,4 and Geordie Elkins3 2Biological Sciences Department, SUNY Cortland, Cortland, NY 13045 and 3Highstead, 127 Lonetown Road, Redding, CT 06896 Abstract. Rare plant species can be at risk of hybridization, reduced genetic variation, and genetic assimilation when a numerically abundant congener co-occurs in or invades their habitat. We investigated hybridization between a species in decline, Asclepias purpurascens L., and its common and widespread congener, Asclepias syriaca L. A total of 40 morphological traits were measured on 60 flowering plants from a mixed population in Connecticut. Cluster and principal component analyses identified two distinct clusters of parental species taxa and a third cluster representing putative hybrids. Although leaf traits of putative hybrids were more similar to A. syriaca, floral traits and the morphological space on the principal component analysis were more similar to A. purpurascens. This suggests that the population contains a mix of F1 and advanced generation hybrids with the possibility of introgression into A. purpurascens. Although putative hybrids are intermediate for most traits, pollen counts reveal reduced fertility of presumed hybrid that might influence mating behaviors and increase the likelihood of backcrossing with A. purpurascens. We suggest a combination of morphological traits that better identify the two parental species as well as hybrids in the field. Conservationists should consider options of managing A. syriaca where A. purpurascens needs protection from competition to prevent genetic assimilation of the latter. Key words: Asclepias, conservation, hybridization Angiosperms abound with natural and anthro- 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Open Myers THESIS.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School School of Science, Engineering, and Technology IMPACT OF OZONE ON MILKWEED (ASCLEPIAS) SPECIES A Thesis in Environmental Pollution Control by Abigail C. Myers 2016 Abigail C. Myers Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science December 2016 The thesis of Abigail C. Myers was reviewed and approved* by the following: Dennis R. Decoteau Professor of Horticulture and Plant Ecosystem Health Thesis Advisor Donald D. Davis Professor of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology Richard Marini Professor of Horticulture Shirley Clark Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering Graduate Program Coordinator, Environmental Engineering and Environmental Pollution Control *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii Abstract Tropospheric (or ground level) ozone in ambient concentrations can damage vegetation and interfere with the human respiratory system. Plants as bioindicators of ozone are commonly used to detect phytotoxic levels of tropospheric ozone where physical/chemical/electrical monitoring equipment cannot be utilized due to expense, electrical needs, or availability of instruments. Asclepias syriaca (Common Milkweed) has been effectively used as a bioindicator for ozone. Visual ozone injury on Common Milkweed is characterized as purple stippling of the upper surface of older leaves as the season progresses, the purple coloration of the upper leaf surface may encompass most of the leaf surface. While sensitivity to ozone has been documented on Common Milkweed, less is known about the ozone sensitivity of other Asclepias species and little is known regarding the concentration dose response of Common Milkweed to ozone and timing of visual symptoms. Of the Asclepias species evaluated Tropical Milkweed (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Ecotype Seed Species Available
    Conservation Blueprint 2020 Local Ecotype Seed Availability 1 Seed Origin Nebraska County of Species Scientific Name Ecoregion Request Generation 2 Origin Western Yarrow Achillea millefolium G0 332 Howard Acmispon americanus or Lotus Deer Vetch unifoliolatus G0 332 Howard Rough Purple Gerardia Agalinis aspera G0 332 Howard Slender Gerardia Agalinis tenuifolia G0 332 Howard Anise Hyssop Agastache foeniculum G2 332 Howard White Snakeroot Ageratina altissima G0 332 Howard Wild Onion/Wild Garlic Allium canadense G0 332 Howard Ragweed, Common Ambrosia artemisiifolia G0 332 Howard Ragweed, Western Ambrosia psilostachya G0 332 Howard Ragweed, Giant Ambrosia trifida G0 332 Howard Leadplant Amorpha canescens G0 332 Howard Caroline Anemone Anemone caroliniana G0 332 Howard Candle Anemone Anemone cylindrica G0 332 Howard & Colfax Field Pussytoes Antennaria neglecta G0 332 Howard Prickly Poppy Argemone polyanthemos G0 332 Howard White Sage Artemisia ludoviciana G0 332 Howard Sand Milkweed Asclepias arenaria G0 332 Howard, Greeley & Loup Swamp Milkweed Asclepias incarnata G1 332 Howard Purple Milkweed Asclepias purpurascens G1 251 Kansas Showy Milkweed Asclepias speciosa G1 332 Howard Narrow-leaved Milkweed Asclepias stenophylla G0 332 Howard Sullivant's Milkweed Asclepias sullivantii G1 332 Howard, Knox & Merrick Howard, Colfax & Common Milkweed Asclepias syriaca G0 332 Greeley Common Milkweed Asclepias syriaca G0 222 Michigan Butterfly Milkweed Asclepias tuberosa G1 332 Howard Whorled Milkweed Asclepias verticillata G0 332 Howard Green Milkweed
    [Show full text]
  • Milkweed and Monarchs
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE MILKWEEDS AND MONARCHS Acknowledgments Table of Contents We thank Dr. David Horn, past president of the Ohio Lepidopterists, 03 MONARCH LIFE CYCLE for his thoughtful review of this publication. Our appreciation goes 04 MONARCH MIGRATION to the Ohio Lepidopterists, and Monarch Watch. These organizations work tirelessly to promote the conservation of butterflies and moths. 05 PROBLEMS & DECLINE COVER PHOTO BY KELLY NELSON 06 MILKWEEDS 07 OTHER MILKWEED SPECIALISTS 08 MONARCH NURSERY GARDEN Introduction 09 FIVE EXCELLENT MILKWEEDS Text and photos by Jim McCormac, Ohio Division of Wildlife, unless otherwise stated. 10 SUPERB MONARCH NECTAR SOURCES The Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is one of North Amer- ica’s most iconic insects. The gorgeous golden-brown and black but- terfly is probably the most celebrated insect on the continent, and the migration of the eastern population is conspicuous and spectacular. Southbound Monarchs can appear anywhere, even in highly urban- ized locales, and the butterflies often use backyard gardens as way sta- tions. Occasionally a resting swarm of hundreds or even thousands of butterflies is encountered. The spectacle of trees dripping with living leaves of butterflies is unlikely to be forgotten. PHOTO BY CHRIS FROST A Pictorial Journey From Caterpillar to Chrysalis to Butterfly PHOTOS BY STEVEN RUSSEL SMITH Monarch Butterfly Life Cycle Like all species in the order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies), soon hatch. The caterpillars begin eating the milkweed foliage, and Monarchs engage in complete metamorphosis. This term indicates grow rapidly. The growth process involves five molts where the cater- that there are four parts to the life cycle: egg, caterpillar, pupa, and pillar sheds its skin and emerges as a larger animal.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants & Pollinators
    Native Plants & Pollinators What is a “Native” plant? A plant that is a part of the balance of nature that has developed over hundreds or thousands of years in a particular region or ecosystem. What is Ecotype? “Ecotype” refers to a genetically unique population of plants adapted to a local environment. This matters when it comes to foliage, flowering, seed set, seed germination and overall plant performance. What is Nectar? Nectar is a sweet liquid secreted by plants to attract pollinators. It is an important food source for butterflies, bees and hummingbirds. What is Pollen? Pollen carries cells which enable fertilization of plants, thus enabling the plant to reproduce. Examples of Pollinators: Bees, butterflies, beetles, flies, as well as some birds and bats are pollinators. About 12% of the world’s flowering plants are wind-pollinated, including grasses, cereal crops, and many trees. Cross-pollination Self-pollination Why is Pollination So Important? Pollination is mutually beneficial to plants AND to pollinators. Pollination results in the production of seeds and is necessary for many plants to reproduce. Why is Pollination So Important? (cont’d) Pollinators receive nectar and/or pollen rewards from the flowers they visit. Sugary nectar provides pollinators with carbohydrates, while pollen offers proteins, fats, vitamins, minerals, and necessary phytochemicals. Why Do Humans Need Pollinators? Pollinators are necessary for three- quarters of our major food crops. Without pollinators, our diets would be severely limited, and it would be more difficult to acquire the variety of vitamins and minerals we need to stay healthy. Go Native! Add Native Plants Pollinators have evolved with native plants, which often need less water than ornamentals.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotic Inventory and Analysis of the Kettle Moraine State Forest a Baseline Inventory and Analysis of Natural Communities, Rare Plants, and Animals
    Biotic Inventory and Analysis of the Kettle Moraine State Forest A Baseline Inventory and Analysis of Natural Communities, Rare Plants, and Animals June 2010 Natural Heritage Inventory Program Bureau of Endangered Resources Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 7921 PUBL ER-821 2010 Kettle Moraine State Forest - 1 - Cover Photos (Clockwise from top left): Oak Woodland at Kettle Moraine Oak Opening SNA. Photo by Drew Feldkirchner, WDNR; prairie milkweed (Asclepias sullivantii). Photo by Ryan O’Connor, WDNR; Ephemeral Pond on the KMSF. Photo by Ryan O’Connor, WDNR; Northern Ribbon Snake (Thamnophis sauritus). Ohio DNR. Copies of this report can be obtained by writing to the Bureau of Endangered Resources at the address on the front cover. This publication is available in alternative format (large print, Braille, audio tape, etc) upon request. Please call (608-266-7012) for more information. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. Kettle Moraine State Forest - 2 - Biotic Inventory and Analysis of the Kettle Moraine State Forest A Baseline Inventory and Analysis of Natural Communities, Rare Plants, and Animals Primary Authors: Terrell Hyde, Christina Isenring, Ryan O’Connor, Amy Staffen, Richard Staffen Natural Heritage Inventory Program Bureau of Endangered Resources Department of Natural Resources P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL Oklahoma Plant List for Monarch Butterflies Why Monarchs? Why Oklahoma? Take Action!
    CENTRAL Oklahoma Plant List for Monarch Butterflies Why Monarchs? Why Oklahoma? Take Action! In the last decade, due to habitat loss and other Oklahoma is centrally located in the From Enid to Durant and Elk City to Tahlequah, factors, monarch butterfly populations have monarch migration flyway! now is the time (before it's too late) for us Okies to plummeted at an alarming rate. And they continue get our hands dirty and help the monarchs! to decline. Each spring, monarchs migrate north through Oklahoma and the Great Plains to Canada in Action 1 - Show your support by taking the pledge Since 1996, monarch colonies have declined 90%. search of milkweed plants on which to lay their to save the monarchs online at If all monarchs from the population high in the eggs. In the fall, they fly back through Oklahoma okiesformonarchs.org. mid-1990s were grouped onto football fields, the and the Great Plains south to Mexico to spend the area they covered has been reduced from 39 fields winter. Action 2 - Provide monarchs with habitat by to an area barely larger than one. planting milkweed and nectar plants on your In order for Monarchs to thrive, we Okies property. Did you know that Oklahoma has 26 Additionally, monarchs and other butterflies help must provide ample food, shelter and breeding different kinds of native milkweed plants and more polinate our crops. It is important to restore and grounds during both their migrations. than 79 monarch-friendly, native nectar plants? protect their habitat so we can continue to grow There's plenty to choose from! We made it easy our food.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Plants of the Central United States: Native Milkweeds Scape Between 1999 and 2010, with a Corresponding 81% De- and Garden Pests
    Pollinator Plants of the Central United States Native Milkweeds (Asclepias spp.) June 2013 The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation www.xerces.org Acknowledgements Lead Author Brianna Borders (The Xerces Society) Co-Authors Allen Casey (USDA-NRCS Missouri), John M. Row and Rich Wynia (USDA-NRCS Kansas), Randy King and Alayna Jacobs (USDA-NRCS Arkansas), Chip Taylor (Mon- arch Watch), Eric Mader (The Xerces Society) Editing and layout Hailey Walls and Kaitlyn Rich (The Xerces Society) Photographs We thank the photographers who generously allowed use of their images. Copyright of all photographs remains with the photographers. Cover main: Butterfly milkweed (Asclepias tuberosa) with black and gold bumble bee (Bombus auricomus). Sarah Foltz Jordan, The Xerces Society Cover bottom left: Monarch caterpillar Danaus( plexippus). William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Bugwood.org Cover bottom right: Green antelopehorn milkweed (Asclepias viridis). Marion Doss. Map Credits Special thanks to the USDA-NRCS East Remote Sensing Laboratory in conjunction with the National Plant Data Team for producing the species range maps. Data sources used were the USDA PLANTS database and ESRI Spatial Data (2006). Funding The Xerces Society’s milkweed conservation work is supported by a national USDA- NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant, The Hind Foundation, SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund, Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund, The Elizabeth Ordway Dunn Foundation, The William H. and Mattie Wattis Harris Foundation, the Monarch Joint Venture, Turner Foundation Inc., The McCune Charitable Foundation, and Xerces Society members. The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation 628 NE Broadway Suite 200, Portland, OR 97232 855-232-6639 www.xerces.org The Xerces Society is a nonprofit organization that protects wildlife through the conservation of invertebrates and their habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2018-2019
    Minnesota Plant Press The Minnesota Native Plant Society Newsletter www.mnnps.org Volume 37 Number 1 Winter 2018-2019 Minnesota Native Plant Society A non-profit organization dedicated to the conservation and appreciation of Minnesota’s native plants and plant communities through education and public awareness. Monthly Meetings Programs – Spring 2019 Thompson Park Center/Dakota Lodge Thompson County Park March 7: Climate Change Adaptation in Parks of the 1200 Stassen Lane Great Lakes Region - Dr. Lee Frelich, Director, The West St. Paul, MN 55118 University of Minnesota Center for Forest Ecology; Fellow, Institute on the Environment. First Thursday of the month, October-December & February-June. Social period begins at 6:30 p.m. and POM: Populus balsamifera (Balsam poplar) the meeting runs from 7:00-9:00 p.m. Please check March 23: Annual Symposium - Prairies and the website at www.mnnps.org for more program Grasslands of the Lower 48. Held at the Minnesota information. Landscape Arboretum. Membership April 4: Citizens using Plants (and invertebrates) The MNNPS membership starts January 1st. Dues may to Measure Wetland Health: Wetland Health be paid at the monthly meeting or mailed to: Evaluation Program (WHEP) - Carolyn Dindorf, Vice President/Limnologist, Fortin Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 16237 and Mark C. Gernes, Research Scientist, Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55116 Pollution Control Agency. Memberships can be paid in person at our monthly POM: Thelyptris palustris (Marsh fern) programs (cash/check), through standard mail, or online via PayPal. May 2: Minnesota Wetland Assessment Status and Trends - Michael Bourdaghs, Environmental Membership Categories are: Research Scientist, Minnesota Pollution Control • Individual or family $15 Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • MILKWEED in the GARDEN Milkweed Is the Only Food Source for Monarch Caterpillars
    MILKWEED IN THE GARDEN Milkweed is the only food source for Monarch caterpillars. BUTTERFLY MILKWEED (Asclepias tuberosa) SWAMP MILKWEED (Asclepias incarnata) Exposure: Full Sun Soil: Well-drained Exposure: Full Sun Soil: Damp to Medium Bloom time: June-August Height: 2-3’ Bloom time: June-August Height: 3-4’ COMMON MILKWEED (Asclepias syriaca) WHORLED MILKWEED (Asclepias verticillata) Exposure: Full Sun Soil: Dry to Medium Exposure: Full Sun Soil: Dry to Medium Bloom time: June-August Height: 4-6’ Bloom time: July-September Height: 1-2’ TROPICAL MILKWEED (Asclepias curassavica) POKE MILKWEED (Asclepias exaltata) Annual in Wisconsin Exposure: Part-sun Soil: Medium Exposure: Full Sun Soil: Dry to Medium Bloom time: June-July Height: 4-5’ Bloom time: June-September Height: 2-3’ SULLIVANT’S MILKWEED (Asclepias sullivantii) Exposure: Full Sun Soil: Medium This publication is produced by Bloom time: June-August Height: 3-5’ Master Gardener Volunteers of the University of Wisconsin Extension using university research based information. Contact UW- Extension office in your county for information on other publications and programs. Milwaukee County UW-Extension (414) 256-4600 Waukesha County UW-Extension (262) 548-7770 GROWING MILKWEED FOR MONARCH BUTTERFLIES The Monarch butterfly population is in decline. Although population estimates vary each year, Monarchs have declined drastically from their peak population in the 1990’s due to several contributing causes. Monarch caterpillars can eat only milkweed and we have lost billions of milkweed plants, mostly to development and elimination as weeds in farm areas, fields, roadways and other spaces. You can help Monarchs by planting milkweed in your yards to start replacing what has been lost and feed hungry caterpillars.
    [Show full text]