GENERAL MEETING Wednesday, 19 April1961, ASSEMBLY at 11.10 A.M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GENERAL MEETING Wednesday, 19 April1961, ASSEMBLY at 11.10 A.M United Nations SPECIAL POLITICAL COMMITTEE, 255th GENERAL MEETING Wednesday, 19 April1961, ASSEMBLY at 11.10 a.m. FIFTEENTH SESSION Official Records New York CONTENTS tion. As far back as the ninth century A.D. it had Page established a powerful naval force to protect its coasts Agenda item 89: from piracy. In the eighteenth century its fleet had Question of Oman. 133 been strong enough to drive the Portuguese invaders from Oman and the surrounding area. By the mid­ Chairman: Mr. Carlet R. AUGUSTE (Haiti). eighteenth century Oman had become the most power­ ful Arabian State, controlling part of the Zanzibar coast in East Africa as well as parts of Persia and Balu­ In the absence of the Chairman, Mr. Gamboa (Philip­ chistan. pines), Vice-Chairman, took the Chair. 3. Its strength, its strategic position on the route from AGENDA ITEM 89 Europe to the Orient and its flourishing trade, had Question of Oman (A/4521) made it a target for British imperialism, which by that time had acquired a free hand in the area, as a result of 1. Mr. SHUKAIRY (Saudi Arabia) said that in its victory over France in the Seven Years' War. The requesting the inclusion of the question of Oman in British had then launched the first of a series of military the Assembly's agenda (A/4521) the delegations of campaigns, the principal objective being to bring Oman the Arab States had presented it as a case of armed within their sphere of influence, if not to incorporate aggression by the United Kingdom against the State it into the British Empire. They had done so on the of Oman in violation of its political independence, its pretext of combating slavery and piracy, but their own sovereignty and its territorial integrity. The United record in eastern Arabia was itself one of robbery on Kingdom had, however, been guilty not only of aggres­ land, piracy at sea, and the enslavement of a whole sion, but also of denying that it was an aggressor even people. By means of armed force, intrigue and financial while it admitted that United Kingdom troops were subsidies they had finally achieved their imperialist engaged in military operations in Oman, of denying aims, successively detaching Zanzibar and Muscat, Oman's statehood, even while it asserted the existence breaking up the territory of Oman into nine separate of the so-called Sultanate of Muscat and Oman, and units and finally invading the country. of claiming that it was not a party to the conflict even 4. The factor determining the dismemberment of while it attacked the defenceless people of Oman with Oman was neither religion, language, race nor aspira­ machine guns, heavy mortars and jet aircraft. Having tions, for the people of Oman were one in all those blockaded Oman by land and sea and imposed a total respects; rather it was British imperialism. Until 1954 news blackout, it was seeking to justify its aggression the British had been content to control the puppet by claiming that it was helping to defend the rig-hts Sultanate of Muscat and the seven so-called Trucial of a Sultan who was in reality a puppet of a kind all Coast Sheikdoms while the Imamate of Oman had too familiar to peoples striving to throw off the yoke continued to be fully independent and sovereign. At that of imperialism. It had thus become the task of the time, however, oil had been discovered in Oman and delegations of the Arab States not only to draw atten­ the British had decided that they must bring the country tion to the aggression committed but also to refute the under their control at all costs. Yet they knew by distorted version of the situation presented by the experience that the Omanis would not willingly allow United Kingdom, a State which, as a permanent member themselves to be brought under British domination. of the Security Council, had a special responsibility for When the British Consul at Muscat had written to the the maintenance of peace and security. Imam's Deputy in 1919 threatening to cut off Oman's 2. The independent and sovereign State of Oman was trade and hinting that British troops might occupy the as old as any State represented in the United Nations. country if the Imam did not negotiate with him, the The institution of the Imamate, under which the secular Imam had refused, for he had been aware that such and religious Head of the State was chosen in accord­ negotiations led to foreign domination, as the history ance with the principle of popular election, dated back of colonialism in other parts of Asia and in Africa had to the eighth century A.D. In the intervening centuries, demonstrated. The people of Oman, with their 1200- according to an authoritative Arab historian, eighty­ year tradition of freedom, preferred isolation with all five Imams had ruled Oman in almost uninterrupted its disadvantages to domination by a foreign Power. succession. The present Imam had been elected by his The British had therefore decided to conceal their people in 1954. The Iman as a sovereign ruler was intentions behind the fa<;ade of the puppet Sultanate of responsible for defence, the levying of taxes and law Muscat, with whom a British oil company had entered enforcement. Oman was thus a democracy in the purest into an agreement in 1953. The oil company's first step sense of the word, perhaps the oldest democracy still had been to finance the establishment of an army surviving as a State. Moreover, it had never been a nominally under the Sultan's command but actually mere vassal State but had consistently enjoyed full controlled by the British. In 1954 that army had been sovereignty, with all the attributes of statehood, and moved for training to the southern part of Muscat, had played a major role in the history of Arab civiliza- close to the prospective field of operations in Oman, 133 A/SPC/SR.255 134 General Assembly-Fifteenth Session Special Political Committee and in December of the same year the British had ment betwe~n a sovereign aand certain of his tribes. finally launched armed aggression against the Imamate. Such a claim was preposterous. The Treaty of Sib In 1957 that aggression had taken the form of the was a peace treaty concluded to end a war between large-scale offensive which had been brought to the the Imamate of Oman and the Sultanate of Muscat. attention of the Security Council. 1 The forces of the Imam had marched on Muscat to 5. In December 1955 it had been decided that the free the country from a dynasty which had brought dis­ memberment, humiliation and foreign domination to ~ult~n should impos~ his authority by force on the mtenor of Oman. Aircraft had reconnoitred Nizwa Oman, but United Kingdom intervention had saved the the capital of Oman, and ground forces flying th~ Sultan ~nd had resulted in the conclusion of the treaty. Sultan's colours but led by British officers had then Under Its. terms, the t':'o parties pledged non-aggression entered the country and seized the capital. Although and non-mterference m each other's domestic affairs t~e Sultan's Fo~eig_n Minister had described the opera­ a characteristic feature of international treaties. Th~ tion as the begmmng of a war, the United Kingdom United Kingdom had in fact invoked its provisions· in had assured the world that it was a purely internal 1922 its Consul in Muscat had referred to an act of affair of the Sultanate. The Imam had retreated to the aggression "on the part of Oman along the borders of mountains to continue the fight against the British. The the State of Muscat". Furthermore, a British com­ people of Oman were determined never to surrender mander of the Sultan's forces had himself d~scribed the in the struggle for their freedom, and in July 1957, treaty as "a virtual acknowledgement of the independ­ when the Sultan's army of mercenaries had proved ence of the Imamate". Other well-informed author­ unequal to the task, the United Kingdom had been ities . had expressed the same view. Since the Treaty obliged to launch a major military operation to crush of Sib pledged the Sultan of Muscat not to interfere the resistance of the people of Oman. Ground forces in the internal affairs of Oman, he could hardly be and jet aircraft armed with cannon and rockets had regarded as the sovereign ruler of that country. For on the admission of the United Kingdom's Minister fo; the first time in two centuries, in 1955 a Sultan of Foreign Affairs, gone into action against the rebel tribes Muscat had entered Oman, under the protection of in central Oman, where the so-called rebels had been British jet fighters. ordered to leave their ancestral towns and villages. In 9. Quite apart from the provisions of the treaty it was 1958 and 1959 United Kingdom forces in the area had well established that the Sultan of Muscat hacl never been reinforced by units from Malaya and Kenya. All exercised any authority over Oman either before or sea approaches to Oman had been closed and complete after t~e signing of the treaty. Prior to the British censorship imposed. aggressiOn, _Oman _had always been independent and 6. The United Kingdom had thrown its forces against fully sovereign, while Muscat had been a British pro­ the country to win its oil, but the people of Oman tectorate or dependency; that was why the people of would continue to fight for their freedom until the Oman had constantly endeavoured to drive out the British had been driven not only out of the present British together with their puppet, the Sultan of Oman, but out of Greater Oman, which extended from Muscat.
Recommended publications
  • The Migration of Indians to Eastern Africa: a Case Study of the Ismaili Community, 1866-1966
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2019 The Migration of Indians to Eastern Africa: A Case Study of the Ismaili Community, 1866-1966 Azizeddin Tejpar University of Central Florida Part of the African History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Tejpar, Azizeddin, "The Migration of Indians to Eastern Africa: A Case Study of the Ismaili Community, 1866-1966" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 6324. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6324 THE MIGRATION OF INDIANS TO EASTERN AFRICA: A CASE STUDY OF THE ISMAILI COMMUNITY, 1866-1966 by AZIZEDDIN TEJPAR B.A. Binghamton University 1971 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2019 Major Professor: Yovanna Pineda © 2019 Azizeddin Tejpar ii ABSTRACT Much of the Ismaili settlement in Eastern Africa, together with several other immigrant communities of Indian origin, took place in the late nineteenth century and early twentieth centuries. This thesis argues that the primary mover of the migration were the edicts, or Farmans, of the Ismaili spiritual leader. They were instrumental in motivating Ismailis to go to East Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1 Comprehensive International Points List
    Table 1 Comprehensive International Points List FCC ITU-T Country Region Dialing FIPS Comments, including other 1 Code Plan Code names commonly used Abu Dhabi 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Aden 5 967 YE include with Yemen Admiralty Islands 7 675 PP include with Papua New Guinea (Bismarck Arch'p'go.) Afars and Assas 1 253 DJ Report as 'Djibouti' Afghanistan 2 93 AF Ajman 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Akrotiri Sovereign Base Area 9 44 AX include with United Kingdom Al Fujayrah 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Aland 9 358 FI Report as 'Finland' Albania 4 355 AL Alderney 9 44 GK Guernsey (Channel Islands) Algeria 1 213 AG Almahrah 5 967 YE include with Yemen Andaman Islands 2 91 IN include with India Andorra 9 376 AN Anegada Islands 3 1 VI include with Virgin Islands, British Angola 1 244 AO Anguilla 3 1 AV Dependent territory of United Kingdom Antarctica 10 672 AY Includes Scott & Casey U.S. bases Antigua 3 1 AC Report as 'Antigua and Barbuda' Antigua and Barbuda 3 1 AC Antipodes Islands 7 64 NZ include with New Zealand Argentina 8 54 AR Armenia 4 374 AM Aruba 3 297 AA Part of the Netherlands realm Ascension Island 1 247 SH Ashmore and Cartier Islands 7 61 AT include with Australia Atafu Atoll 7 690 TL include with New Zealand (Tokelau) Auckland Islands 7 64 NZ include with New Zealand Australia 7 61 AS Australian External Territories 7 672 AS include with Australia Austria 9 43 AU Azerbaijan 4 994 AJ Azores 9 351 PO include with Portugal Bahamas, The 3 1 BF Bahrain 5 973 BA Balearic Islands 9 34 SP include
    [Show full text]
  • List of Certain Foreign Institutions Classified As Official for Purposes of Reporting on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY JANUARY 2001 Revised Aug. 2002, May 2004, May 2005, May/July 2006, June 2007 List of Certain Foreign Institutions classified as Official for Purposes of Reporting on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms The attached list of foreign institutions, which conform to the definition of foreign official institutions on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms, supersedes all previous lists. The definition of foreign official institutions is: "FOREIGN OFFICIAL INSTITUTIONS (FOI) include the following: 1. Treasuries, including ministries of finance, or corresponding departments of national governments; central banks, including all departments thereof; stabilization funds, including official exchange control offices or other government exchange authorities; and diplomatic and consular establishments and other departments and agencies of national governments. 2. International and regional organizations. 3. Banks, corporations, or other agencies (including development banks and other institutions that are majority-owned by central governments) that are fiscal agents of national governments and perform activities similar to those of a treasury, central bank, stabilization fund, or exchange control authority." Although the attached list includes the major foreign official institutions which have come to the attention of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Department of the Treasury, it does not purport to be exhaustive. Whenever a question arises whether or not an institution should, in accordance with the instructions on the TIC forms, be classified as official, the Federal Reserve Bank with which you file reports should be consulted. It should be noted that the list does not in every case include all alternative names applying to the same institution.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly
    United Nations FOURTH COMMITTEE, 1571st GENERAL MEETING ASSEMBLY Monday, 29 November 1965, at 10.20 a.m. TJf/E,,'TIETH SESSIO;'' Official Records NEW YORK CONTENTS AGENDA ITEMS 69 AND 70 Page Question of South West Africa: reports of the Special Requests for hearings (continued) Com"nittee on the Situation with regard to the Requests concerning Oman (agenda item 73) lmiJiementation of the Declaration on the Granting (continued) . • . • . 331 of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (continued) (A/5690 and Add.1-3; A/5781, A/5800/ Agenda items 69 and 70: Rev .1, chap. IV; A/5840, A/5949, A/5993, A/6000/ Question of South West Africa: reports of Rev.1, chap. IV: A/6035 and Add.1-4) the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Special educational and training programmes for Declaration on the Granting of Independence South West Africa: reports of the Secretary-General to Colonial Countries and Peoples (continued) (continued) (A/5782 and (orr .1, Add.l and Add.lj Special educational and training programmes Corr.l; A/6080 and Add.l and 2) for South West Africa: reports of the GEl"ERAL DEBATE (continued) Secretary-General (continued) General debate (continued). • 331 4. Mr. G. E. 0. \VILLIAMS (Sierra Leone) said that he would like to express his delegation's satisfaction Agenda item 73: at the announcement made at the previous meeting that Question of Oman: report of the Ad Hoc Com­ three South West African polit\cal parties would unite mittee on Oman to further their cause. General debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassador Richard W. Boehm
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR RICHARD W. BOEHM Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: June 27, 1994 Copyright 199 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Queen New York 1926 (amaica High School Army armored division Germany 194,-1946 Adelphi .ollege graduated 19,0 0ngland France 1941-1949 2erits of G.I. Bill Prentice Hall Publishing .ompany 2utual Insurance .ompany Foreign Service 06amination process Appointed to the Foreign Service December 19,4 2otivations to enter the Foreign Service New Division 19,,-19,6 Henry Suydam head Role of Division News-tickers service 8iaison with the bureau of Near 0astern Affairs 9sort of assistant spokesman: Department of State;s relationship with the press .old war issues Foreign Service Institute 19,6 A <100 course .onsular course Schott 2c8eod & Frank Auerbach Naha Okinawa 19,6-19,1 (unior vice-consul Organization people in the consular unit 8iving in Okinawa Report on 9Revisionist sentiment among the Okinawans: Reaction of American military command to report 1 Hamburg West Germany 19,9 Assistant General Service Officer German language school Frankfurt West Berlin West Germany 19,9-1962 0conomic Section 19,9-1960 Driving on the autobahn to West Berlin Khrushchev;s ultimatum 0conomy population government of West Berlin Prohibited manufacture and sales of goods for military use Question of dual use items French position Access to 0ast Berlin No contact with 0ast German authorities A.S. policy on 0ast Germany 0conomic developments in 0ast Germany 9Inter-Bonal Trade: Disparity between 0ast and West German economic situations Possibility of Soviet attack on West Berlin fear of nuclear war Disparity of Soviet attack on West Berlin fear of nuclear war .oncerns about change in A.S.
    [Show full text]
  • University of London Oman and the West
    University of London Oman and the West: State Formation in Oman since 1920 A thesis submitted to the London School of Economics and Political Science in candidacy for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Francis Carey Owtram 1999 UMI Number: U126805 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U126805 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 bLOSiL ZZLL d ABSTRACT This thesis analyses the external and internal influences on the process of state formation in Oman since 1920 and places this process in comparative perspective with the other states of the Gulf Cooperation Council. It considers the extent to which the concepts of informal empire and collaboration are useful in analysing the relationship between Oman, Britain and the United States. The theoretical framework is the historical materialist paradigm of International Relations. State formation in Oman since 1920 is examined in a historical narrative structured by three themes: (1) the international context of Western involvement, (2) the development of Western strategic interests in Oman and (3) their economic, social and political impact on Oman.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Coding Units
    INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) .
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Ibadi Oman
    UCLA Journal of Religion Volume 2 2018 Developing Tolerance and Conservatism: A Study of Ibadi Oman Connor D. Elliott The George Washington University ABSTRACT This thesis analyzes the development of Omani-Ibadi society from pre- Islam to the present day. Oman represents an anomaly in the religious world because its Ibadi theology is conservative in nature while also preaching unwavering tolerance. To properly understand how Oman developed such a unique culture and religion, it is necessary to historically analyze the country by recounting the societal developments that occurred throughout the millennia. By doing so, one begins to understand that Oman did not achieve this peaceful religious theology over the past couple of decades. Oman has an exceptional society that was built out of longtime traditions like a trade-based economy that required foreign interaction, long periods of political sovereignty or autonomy, and a unique theology. The Omani-Ibadi people and their leaders have continuously embraced the ancient roots of their regional and religious traditions to create a contemporary state that espouses a unique society that leads people to live conservative personal lives while exuding outward tolerance. Keywords: Oman, Ibadi, Tolerance, Theology, History, Sociology UCLA Journal of Religion Vol. 2, 2018 Developing Tolerance and Conservatism: A Study of Ibadi Oman By Connor D. Elliott1 The George Washington University INTRODUCTION he Sultanate of Oman is a country which consistently draws acclaim T for its tolerance and openness towards peoples of varying faiths. The sect of Islam most Omanis follow, Ibadiyya, is almost entirely unique to Oman with over 2 million of the 2.5 million Ibadis worldwide found in the sultanate.2 This has led many to see the Omani government as the de facto state-representative of Ibadiyya in contemporary times.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 48
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 48 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2010 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All ri hts reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information stora e and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Windrush Group ,indrush House Avenue Two Station Lane ,itney O028 40, 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President 2arshal of the Royal Air Force Sir 2ichael 3eetham GC3 C3E DFC AFC 7ice8President Air 2arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KC3 C3E AFC Committee Chairman Air 7ice82arshal N 3 3aldwin C3 C3E FRAeS 7ice8Chairman -roup Captain 9 D Heron O3E Secretary -roup Captain K 9 Dearman FRAeS 2embership Secretary Dr 9ack Dunham PhD CPsychol A2RAeS Treasurer 9 Boyes TD CA 2embers Air Commodore - R Pitchfork 23E 3A FRAes :9 S Cox Esq BA 2A :6r M A Fopp MA F2A FI2 t :-roup Captain A 9 Byford MA MA RAF :,ing Commander P K Kendall BSc ARCS MA RAF ,ing Commander C Cummings Editor & Publications ,ing Commander C G Jefford M3E BA 2ana er :Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS OPENIN- ADDRESS œ Air 2shl Ian Macfadyen 7 ON.Y A SIDESHO,? THE RFC AND RAF IN A 2ESOPOTA2IA 1914-1918 by Guy Warner THE RAF AR2OURED CAR CO2PANIES IN IRAB 20 C2OST.YD 1921-1947 by Dr Christopher Morris No 4 SFTS AND RASCHID A.IES WAR œ IRAB 1941 by )A , Cdr Mike Dudgeon 2ORNIN- Q&A F1 SU3STITUTION OR SU3ORDINATION? THE E2P.OY8 63 2ENT OF AIR PO,ER O7ER AF-HANISTAN AND THE NORTH8,EST FRONTIER, 1910-1939 by Clive Richards THE 9E3E.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 3
    Attachment 3 Points that Receive International Telecommunications Traffic: Alphabetic Listing FCC reporting Codes ITU-T FIPS Census Country Country Summary Dialing 10-3 Schedule C Comments, including other Code Code Code Plan names commonly used Abu Dhabi 3 1 325 971 TC 520.0 Included with United Arab Emirates Admiralty Islands 8 2 237 675 PP 604.0 inc. Papua New Guinea (Bismarck A.) Afghanistan 7 3 93 AF 531.0 Ajman 3 4 325 971 TC 520.0 Included with United Arab Emirates Alaska 5 1005 1 US 100.0 Albania 9 6 355 AL 481.0 Alderney 1 7 326 44 GK 412.0 Guernsey (Channel Islands) Algeria 2 8 213 AG 721.0 American Samoa 8 1009 684 AQ 951.0 Andaman Islands 7 355 141 91 IN 533.0 included with India Andorra 1 10 33 AN 427.1 Anegada Islands 4 11 337 1 VI 248.2 included with Virgin Islands, British Angola 2 12 244 AO 762.0 Anguilla 4 13 1 AV 248.1 Dependent territory of United Kingdom Antarctica 10 14 672 AY Includes Scott & Casey U.S. bases Antigua and Barbuda 4 15 1 AC 248.4 Antipodes Islands 8 356 217 64 NZ 614.1 included with New Zealand Argentina 6 16 54 AR 357.0 Armenia 9 17 7 AM 463.1 Aruba 4 18 297 AA 277.9 part of the Netherlands realm Ascension Island 2 19 264 247 SH 758.0 included with Saint Helena Auckland Islands 8 357 217 64 NZ 614.1 included with New Zealand Australia 8 20 61 AS 602.1 Austria 1 21 43 AU 433.0 Azerbaijan 9 22 7 AJ 463.2 Azores 1 23 245 351 PO 471.0 included with Portugal Bahamas, The 4 24 1 BF 236.0 Bahrain 3 25 973 BA 525.0 Baker Island 8 1026 11 FQ 980.0 Balearic Islands 1 27 293 34 SP 470.0 included with Spain
    [Show full text]
  • Oman's Foreign Policy : Foundations and Practice
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-7-2005 Oman's foreign policy : foundations and practice Majid Al-Khalili Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Al-Khalili, Majid, "Oman's foreign policy : foundations and practice" (2005). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1045. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1045 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida OMAN'S FOREIGN POLICY: FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICE A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by Majid Al-Khalili 2005 To: Interim Dean Mark Szuchman College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Majid Al-Khalili, and entitled Oman's Foreign Policy: Foundations and Practice, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. Dr. Nicholas Onuf Dr. Charles MacDonald Dr. Richard Olson Dr. 1Mohiaddin Mesbahi, Major Professor Date of Defense: November 7, 2005 The dissertation of Majid Al-Khalili is approved. Interim Dean Mark Szuchman C lege of Arts and Scenps Dean ouglas Wartzok University Graduate School Florida International University, 2005 ii @ Copyright 2005 by Majid Al-Khalili All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revival of the Ibadi Imamate in Oman and the Threat to Muscat, 1913-20 J
    The Revival of the Ibadi Imamate in Oman and the Threat to Muscat, 1913-20 J. E. Peterson By the beginning of 1913 Oman was reaching the nadir of its fortunes, marking the middle of a century of frustration and decline. Although the Sultan, Faisal b. Turki Al Bñ Sa`idi, was the nominal ruler of all the country, he only exercised full control over the capital area of Muscat and Matrah, and the coastal strip to the northwest known as al-Batinah. Otherwise, the interior of Oman went its own nearly-independent way, hindered only by the presence of a few walls (representatives of the Sultan) in the principal towns, such as Nizwa or Sama'il. The period of rebellion from 1913 to 192o is important in the history of Oman for a number of reasons. The restoration of the Ibadi Imamate, periodically revived since the beginning of the nineteenth century, was an accomplishment of this period that lasted for forty-two years. But the method of its establishment pre- sented a grave threat to the government of the Sultanate, weakened by fifty years of decline, and continually attacked by the religious zealots of the interior for its close relationship with the British. The revolt of 1923-2o was essentially tribal in nature, with the institution of the Imamate superimposed on it in order to lend legitimacy and unity to the uprising. There were two factors which made it a deadly menace to Muscat and gave it as good a chance of wresting control of the entire country away from the Sultan as had the move- ment of 1868-71.' The first was the revival of the Imamate, without which little tribal cooperation could have been expected and the revolt could have only repeated the attack of 1895 at most.' The second factor was the development of this uprising into a unified stand of co-operation between both the Ghafiri and Hinawi factions, something that even the 1868-71 movement had not been able to achieve.' Thus the combination of forces set in motion in the spring of 1913 posed the most dangerous threat to the regime in Muscat since Muscat had become the capital of the country.
    [Show full text]