Freshwater Sponges (Porifera: Spongillida) of Tennessee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freshwater Sponges (Porifera: Spongillida) of Tennessee Freshwater Sponges (Porifera: Spongillida) of Tennessee Authors: John Copeland, Stan Kunigelis, Jesse Tussing, Tucker Jett, and Chase Rich Source: The American Midland Naturalist, 181(2) : 310-326 Published By: University of Notre Dame URL: https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-181.2.310 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/The-American-Midland-Naturalist on 18 Sep 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by United States Fish & Wildlife Service National Conservation Training Center Am. Midl. Nat. (2019) 181:310–326 Notes and Discussion Piece Freshwater Sponges (Porifera: Spongillida) of Tennessee ABSTRACT.—Freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillida) are an understudied fauna. Many U.S. state and federal conservation agencies lack fundamental information such as species lists and distribution data. Such information is necessary for management of aquatic resources and maintaining biotic diversity. During the months of June, July, and August of 2013, 2014 and 2015 a survey was conducted in Tennessee to document species of freshwater sponges and obtain preliminary distribution data. Selected rivers and streams were sampled at two to five sites. A total of 520 sponge samples were collected. Spicules and gemmules were viewed and photographed using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Thirteen or 39% of the known species of freshwater sponges occurring in the North America have been collected from Tennessee’s rivers and streams. Eunapius fragilis, Spongilla lacustris, and Trochospongilla horrida were the most abundant and widely distributed species. Corvospongilla becki and Heteromeyenia latitenta were the least frequently encountered sponges. INTRODUCTION Freshwater accounts for only 0.01% of the World’s water and about 0.8% of the Earth’s surface yet it supports at least 100,000 species (Dudgeon et al., 2005). Unfortunately, freshwater biodiversity has experienced a continuous decline over the past several decades. Dudgeon et al. (2005) reported losses of freshwater biodiversity are far greater than those of the most affected terrestrial ecosystems. Although sponges are relatively common inhabitants of freshwaters, they are understudied in the United States. Information needed for management and conservation is lacking. Watermolen (2008) reported the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service noted the limitations of existing knowledge in its mid- 19700s review of freshwater sponges. In addition Watermolen (2008) noted conservationists have done little since that initial assessment to monitor or further evaluate the status of freshwater sponges. Manconi and Pronzato (2016a) reported the study of freshwater sponges (Spongillida) is a neglected field of study and the major risk of extinction is the decline of experts in their taxonomy and natural history. Over 8000 sponge species are recognized, of which less than 250 are freshwater sponges. All recent freshwater sponges belong to the phylum Porifera, class Demospongiae, order Haplosclerida, and suborder Spongillida. Six families are currently recognized, of which three Metaniidae, Potamolepidae, and Spongillidae occur in the United States. Fourteen genera and 33 species have been documented from the Nearctic Biogeographical Realm (Manconi and Pronzato, 2016b). Tennessee is recognized as one of the most aquatic biological diverse states within the United States (Stein, 2002). Tennessee’s aquatic diversity is due to the state’s geologic and hydrographic diversity (Etnier and Starnes, 1993). Six physiographic provinces and five major river basins (Fig. 1) are found within Tennessee. While much is known concerning the fishes (Etnier and Starnes, 1993) and freshwater mussels (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998) of Tennessee, little has been documented concerning freshwater sponges. Six reports concerning freshwater sponges in Tennessee have been published. Hoff (1943) documented four species from the Reelfoot Lake region: Eunapius fragilis (Leidy, 1851), Heteromeyenia tubisperma (Potts, 1881), Racekiela ryderi (Potts, 1882), and Radiospongilla crateriformis (Potts, 1882). Parchment (1966) collected Spongilla lacustris (L., 1759) from Stones River. Kunigelis and Copeland (2014) reported finding Ephydatia fluviatilis (L., 1759), Eunapius fragilis, Racekiela ryderi, Radiospongilla cerebellata (Bowerbank, 1863), Spongilla lacustris, and Trochospongilla horrida (Weltner, 1893) from eastern Tennessee. Copeland et al., (2015a) added Ephydatia muelleri (Lieberkuhn,¨ 1856) to the list of sponges from eastern Tennessee. Cherokeesia armata Copeland, Pronzato and Manconi, 2015 was recently discovered and described (Copeland et al., 2015b). To develop a better understanding of sponge diversity and species distributions a state-wide survey of selected rivers and streams was undertaken. Due to the uniqueness of the river drainages of Tennessee we expected to discover a diverse freshwater sponge fauna. 310 Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/The-American-Midland-Naturalist on 18 Sep 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by United States Fish & Wildlife Service National Conservation Training Center 2019 NOTES AND DISCUSSION PIECE 311 FIG. 1.—Five major river basins of Tennessee (A) Mississippi, (B) Tennessee, (C) Cumberland, (D) Barren, (E) Conasauga from Kernodle (1972) METHODS During June, July, and August of 2013, 2014, and 2015 selected rivers and streams were surveyed to document the freshwater sponges of Tennessee and obtain distribution data. Criteria for determining waterways to be sampled were aquatic biological diversity, physiographic location, channelization, funding, and time available to researchers. No rivers and streams altered by channelization were sampled by suggestion of Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. Rivers and streams were surveyed by viewing appropriate hard substrates (i.e., rocks and logs) for sponges while wading. Depending upon stream length and access, two to five collection sites were established. A minimum of one human-hour of search time was spent at each collection site. Five hundred and twenty sponge samples were collected. Information collected for each sponge included: river or stream name, river drainage name, latitude and longitude of collection site, and county name. Latitude and longitude were obtained using a Garmin GPSmap 76CSx. Sponges were viewed using a 10 X head-band magnifier for the presence of gemmules. If gemmules were found a section of the sponge was collected. Sponges were preserved in 70% ethanol until processed for light microscopy (LM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). To obtain clean spicule preparations for SEM observation and LM slides excised sponge was dissolved in test tubes containing 65% nitric acid. Once dissolved the remaining spicules were centrifuged to create a slug. Slugs were rinsed and centrifuged three times in distilled water, followed by a final rinse and spin in 70% ethanol. Spicules were pipetted on to glass slides for LM analysis and onto stubs for SEM analysis. Following the procedure of Manconi and Pronzato (2000), a glass substratum was placed under the spicules providing for a black background in the SEM photographs. Disassociated spicules, entire gemmules, and gemmule cross-sections were sputter- coated with gold and observed by Leo 982 and Hitachi TM 3000 SEM. Sponge identification was made using the keys of Manconi and Pronzato (2016b), Reiswig et al. (2010) and descriptions of Penney and Racek (1968). To determine range, mean, and standard deviation for spicular lengths and rotule diameters 30 to 80 of each type of spicule (megascleres, microscleres, and gemmuloscleres) were measured using the measurement program of the Hitachi TM 3000. Ten gemmules of each species were measured for diameter. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Thirteen described species of freshwater sponges, one of the family Potamolepidae and twelve of Spongillidae were collected. Scanning electron microscopy photos of gemmules and spicules for each species are provided (Figs. 2–8). Three species, Eunapius fragilis, Spongilla lacustris, and Trochospongilla horrida were frequently encountered. Corvospongilla becki, and Heteromeyenia latitenta may be the rarest sponges in Tennessee. Distribution information and spicular measurements for Tennessee specimens are provided. Species are listed alphabetically by family. Size ranges for spicules are provided, with means and standard deviations presented within parentheses. Distributional data for each species is presented (Figs. 9–13, Table 1). Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/The-American-Midland-Naturalist on 18 Sep 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use
Recommended publications
  • Erpenbeck, D., Steiner, M., Schuster, A., Genner, M
    Erpenbeck, D., Steiner, M., Schuster, A., Genner, M. J., Pronzato, R., Ruthensteiner, B., van den Spiegel, D., van Soest, R., & Worheide, G. (2019). Minimalist barcodes for sponges: a case study classifying African freshwater Spongillida. Genome, 62(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2018-0098 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1139/gen-2018-0098 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Canada Science Publishing at http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/gen-2018- 0098#.XEH79s2nyUk . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Minimalist barcodes for sponges - A case study classifying African freshwater Spongillida Dirk Erpenbeck1,2,*, Markus Steiner1, Astrid Schuster1, Martin J. Genner3, Renata Manconi4, Roberto Pronzato5, Bernhard Ruthensteiner2,6, Didier van den Spiegel7, Rob W.M. van Soest8, Gert Wörheide1,2,9 1 Department of Earth- & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology and Geobiology, Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. 2 GeoBio-CenterLMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany. 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom. 4 Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Sassari, Sassari, Italy. 5 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell'Ambiente e della Vita, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for a Revised Classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera) Christine Morrow1 and Paco Cárdenas2,3*
    Morrow and Cárdenas Frontiers in Zoology (2015) 12:7 DOI 10.1186/s12983-015-0099-8 DEBATE Open Access Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera) Christine Morrow1 and Paco Cárdenas2,3* Abstract Background: Demospongiae is the largest sponge class including 81% of all living sponges with nearly 7,000 species worldwide. Systema Porifera (2002) was the result of a large international collaboration to update the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on morphological data. Since then, an increasing number of molecular phylogenetic studies have considerably shaken this taxonomic framework, with numerous polyphyletic groups revealed or confirmed and new clades discovered. And yet, despite a few taxonomical changes, the overall framework of the Systema Porifera classification still stands and is used as it is by the scientific community. This has led to a widening phylogeny/classification gap which creates biases and inconsistencies for the many end-users of this classification and ultimately impedes our understanding of today’s marine ecosystems and evolutionary processes. In an attempt to bridge this phylogeny/classification gap, we propose to officially revise the higher taxa Demospongiae classification. Discussion: We propose a revision of the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on molecular data of the last ten years. We recommend the use of three subclasses: Verongimorpha, Keratosa and Heteroscleromorpha. We retain seven (Agelasida, Chondrosiida, Dendroceratida, Dictyoceratida, Haplosclerida, Poecilosclerida, Verongiida) of the 13 orders from Systema Porifera. We recommend the abandonment of five order names (Hadromerida, Halichondrida, Halisarcida, lithistids, Verticillitida) and resurrect or upgrade six order names (Axinellida, Merliida, Spongillida, Sphaerocladina, Suberitida, Tetractinellida). Finally, we create seven new orders (Bubarida, Desmacellida, Polymastiida, Scopalinida, Clionaida, Tethyida, Trachycladida).
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Sponge Hosts and Their Green Algae Symbionts
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.12.247908; this version posted August 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Freshwater sponge hosts and their green algae 2 symbionts: a tractable model to understand intracellular 3 symbiosis 4 5 Chelsea Hall2,3, Sara Camilli3,4, Henry Dwaah2, Benjamin Kornegay2, Christine A. Lacy2, 6 Malcolm S. Hill1,2§, April L. Hill1,2§ 7 8 1Department of Biology, Bates College, Lewiston ME, USA 9 2Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond VA, USA 10 3University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA 11 4Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA 12 13 §Present address: Department of Biology, Bates College, Lewiston ME USA 14 Corresponding author: 15 April L. Hill 16 44 Campus Ave, Lewiston, ME 04240, USA 17 Email address: [email protected] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.12.247908; this version posted August 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 27 Abstract 28 In many freshwater habitats, green algae form intracellular symbioses with a variety of 29 heterotrophic host taxa including several species of freshwater sponge. These sponges perform 30 important ecological roles in their habitats, and the poriferan:green algae partnerships offers 31 unique opportunities to study the evolutionary origins and ecological persistence of 32 endosymbioses.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Records of Spongilla Flies (Neur0ptera:Sisyridae)'
    DISTRIBUTION RECORDS OF SPONGILLA FLIES (NEUR0PTERA:SISYRIDAE)' Harley P. Brown2 Records of sisyrids are rather few and scattered. Parfin and Gurney (1 956) summarized those of the New World. Of six species of Sisyra S. panama was known from but two specimens from Panama, S. nocturna from but one partial specimen from British Honduras, and S. minuta from but one male from the lower Amazon near Santarkm, Par$ Brazil. Of eleven species of Climacia, C. striata was known from a single male from Panama, C. tenebra from a single female from Honduras, C. nota from a lone female from Venezuela, C. chilena from one female from southern Chile, C. carpenteri from two females from Paraguay, C. bimaculata from a female from British Guiana and one from Surinam, C. chapini from seven specimens from Texas and New Mexico, and C, basalis from fourteen females from one locality in British Guiana and one from a ship. C. townesi was known from 41 females taken by one man along the Amazon River between Iquitos, Peru and the vicinity of Santarhm, Brazil. To round out the records presented by Parfin and Gurney: Sisyra apicalis was known from Georgia, Florida, Cuba, and Panama; S. fuscata from British Columbia, Alaska, Ontario, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, New York, Massachusetts, and Maine; S. vicaria from the Pacific northwest and from most of the eastern half of the United States and southern Canada. Climacia areolaris also occurs in most of the eastern half of the United States and Canada. C. californica occurs in Oregon and northern California. ~ava/s(1928:319) listed C.
    [Show full text]
  • Climacia Californica Chandler, 1953 (Neuroptera: Sisyridae) in Utah: Taxonomic Identity, Host Association and Seasonal Occurrence
    AQUATIC INSECTS 2019, VOL. 40, NO. 4, 317–327 https://doi.org/10.1080/01650424.2019.1652329 Climacia californica Chandler, 1953 (Neuroptera: Sisyridae) in Utah: taxonomic identity, host association and seasonal occurrence Makani L. Fishera, Robert C. Mowerb and C. Riley Nelsona aDepartment of Biology and M. L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA; bUtah County Mosquito Abatement, Spanish Fork, UT, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY We provide a record of spongillaflies (Sisyridae) with an associated Received 30 December 2018 host sponge from a population found in Spring Creek, Utah. We Accepted 15 May 2019 monitored the population for the 2016 field season to identify the First published online insect and its associated host sponge and to establish the sea- 30 September 2019 ’ sonal period of the insect s presence in the adult stage. We also KEYWORDS evaluated the commonly used sampling techniques of sweeping Aquatic Neuroptera; and light trapping and made natural history observations. We Sisyridae; freshwater identified the spongillaflies as Climacia californica Chandler, 1953 sponge; Utah; and the sponge to be Ephydatia fluviatilis (Linnaeus, 1758). We col- Intermountain West lected 1726 adults, and light trapping proved to be the superior collecting method. The population was characterised by a two- week emergence peak occurring at the end of July to beginning of August followed by a steep decline. Other habitats within the state contained E. fluviatilis and should be sampled using light traps at times when peak abundances are predicted to further understand the distribution of C. californica across the state and the Intermountain West. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F795281F-0042-4F5F-B15B-F6C584FACF2B Introduction Sisyridae, or spongillaflies, and freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae) are linked together in a parasite–host association (Parfin and Gurney 1956; Steffan 1967; Resh 1976; Pupedis 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Inventary of the Sponge Fauna of the Cemitério Paleolake
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências ISSN: 0001-3765 [email protected] Academia Brasileira de Ciências Brasil de Souza Machado, Vanessa; Volkmer-Ribeiro, Cecilia; Iannuzzi, Roberto Inventary of the Sponge Fauna of the cemitério Paleolake, Catalão, Goiás, Brazil Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 84, núm. 1, 2012, pp. 17-34 Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32721622004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2012) 84(1): 17-34 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc Inventary of the Sponge Fauna of the cemitério Paleolake, Catalão, Goiás, Brazil 1 2 3 VANESSA DE SOUZA MACHADO , CECILIA VOLKMER-RIBEIRO AND ROBERTO IANNUZZI 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Prédio 43113, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil 2 Seção de Invertebrados Inferiores, Setor de Poríferos Continentais, Museu de Ciências Naturais (MCN), Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (FZB), Av. Salvador França, 1427, 90690-000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. 3 Instituto de Geociências, Departamento de Paleontologia e Estratigrafia, UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Prédio 43113, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Manuscript received on June 15, 2010; accepted for publication on October 26, 2010 ABSTRACT The Cemitério Paleolake, Catalão, Goiás, is a lacustrine deposit that is rich in spicules of continental sponges.
    [Show full text]
  • Spongilla Freshwater Sponge
    Spongilla Freshwater Sponge Genus: Spongilla Family: Spongillidae Order: Haposclerida Class: Demospongiae Phylum: Porifera Kingdom: Animalia Conditions for Customer Ownership We hold permits allowing us to transport these organisms. To access permit conditions, click here. Never purchase living specimens without having a disposition strategy in place. There are currently no USDA permits required for this organism. In order to protect our environment, never release a live laboratory organism into the wild. Please dispose of excess living material in a manner to prevent spread into the environment. Consult with your schools to identify their preferred methods of disposal. Primary Hazard Considerations Always wash your hands thoroughly after you handle your organism. Availability • Spongilla is a collected specimen. It is not easy to acquire in the winter, so shortages may occur between December and February. • Spongilla will arrive in pond water inside a plastic 8 oz. jar with a lid. Spongilla can live in its shipping container for about 2–4 days. Spongilla normally has a strong unpleasant odor, so this is not an indication of poor health. A good indicator of health is how well the spongilla retains its shape. Spongilla that is no longer living falls apart when manipulated. Captive Care Habitat: • Carefully remove the sponges, using forceps, and transfer them to an 8" x 3" Specimen Dish 17 W 0560 or to a shallow plastic tray containing about 2" of cold (10°–16 °C) spring water. Spongilla should be stored in the refrigerator. Keep them out of direct light, in semi-dark area, and aerate frequently. Frequent water changes (every 1–3 days), or a continual flow of water is recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellaneous Publication Occasional Paper No. 4 RECORDS of the ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY of INDIA
    Miscellaneous Publication Occasional Paper No. 4 RECORDS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION OCCASIONAL PAPER No. 4 Checklist of Indian Freshwater Sponges, with a .Catalogue of Type-Specimens in the Collection of the Zoological Survey of India (Porifera: Spongillidae) BY s. KHERA and Y. CHATURVEDI I.. - . Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey qf India 1976 PRICE: Inland: Rs. 6.00 Foreign: {, 0.40 or $ 0.70 PRINTED IN INDIA AT AMRA PRESS, MADRAS - 600 041 AND PUBLISHED BY TliE MANAGER OF PUBLICATIONS, CIVIL LINES, DELHI - 110 006. INTRODUCTION Annandale (1911) in his volume in the Fauna of British India series on Freshwater Sponges, Hydroids and Polyzoa described 35 species, subspecies and varieties under seven genera of Spongillidae from what Was then the British India and from yeylon (now Sri Lanka) and Burma. He also recog­ nised three subgenera under the genus Spongilla. Later on (up to 1919) he described a few more species. After Annandale very little work has been done on Indian Spongillidae. Penney and Racek (1968), while making a revision of the freshwater sponges of the world, synonymised many Indian species, subspecies and varieties reported/described by Annandale. This checklist is based on the present status of the different taxa. This tentative list has been prepared to consolidate our knowledge of the freshwater sponges within Indian political boundaries and also with the idea that this may serve as a prelude to a revised volume in the Fauna of India series. It may, however, be stated that many areas of the country have yet to be surveyed for their spongillid fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unique Skeleton of Siliceous Sponges (Porifera; Hexactinellida and Demospongiae) That Evolved first from the Urmetazoa During the Proterozoic: a Review
    Biogeosciences, 4, 219–232, 2007 www.biogeosciences.net/4/219/2007/ Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The unique skeleton of siliceous sponges (Porifera; Hexactinellida and Demospongiae) that evolved first from the Urmetazoa during the Proterozoic: a review W. E. G. Muller¨ 1, Jinhe Li2, H. C. Schroder¨ 1, Li Qiao3, and Xiaohong Wang4 1Institut fur¨ Physiologische Chemie, Abteilung Angewandte Molekularbiologie, Duesbergweg 6, 55099 Mainz, Germany 2Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 7 Nanhai Road, 266071 Qingdao, P. R. China 3Department of Materials Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, P. R. China 4National Research Center for Geoanalysis, 26 Baiwanzhuang Dajie, 100037 Beijing, P. R. China Received: 8 January 2007 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 6 February 2007 Revised: 10 April 2007 – Accepted: 20 April 2007 – Published: 3 May 2007 Abstract. Sponges (phylum Porifera) had been considered an axial filament which harbors the silicatein. After intracel- as an enigmatic phylum, prior to the analysis of their genetic lular formation of the first lamella around the channel and repertoire/tool kit. Already with the isolation of the first ad- the subsequent extracellular apposition of further lamellae hesion molecule, galectin, it became clear that the sequences the spicules are completed in a net formed of collagen fibers. of sponge cell surface receptors and of molecules forming the The data summarized here substantiate that with the find- intracellular signal transduction pathways triggered by them, ing of silicatein a new aera in the field of bio/inorganic chem- share high similarity with those identified in other metazoan istry started.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiculous Skeleton Formation in the Freshwater Sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis Under Hypergravity Conditions
    Spiculous skeleton formation in the freshwater sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis under hypergravity conditions Martijn C. Bart1, Sebastiaan J. de Vet2,3, Didier M. de Bakker4, Brittany E. Alexander1, Dick van Oevelen5, E. Emiel van Loon6, Jack J.W.A. van Loon7 and Jasper M. de Goeij1 1 Department of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Earth Surface Science, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Taxonomy & Systematics, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands 4 Microbiology & Biogeochemistry, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research & Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 5 Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research & Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 6 Department of Computational Geo-Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 7 Dutch Experiment Support Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, VU University Medical Center & Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) & European Space Agency Technology Center (ESA-ESTEC), TEC-MMG LIS Lab, Noordwijk, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ABSTRACT Successful dispersal of freshwater sponges depends on the formation of dormant sponge bodies (gemmules) under adverse conditions. Gemmule formation allows the sponge to overcome critical environmental conditions, for example, desiccation or freezing, and to re-establish as a fully developed sponge when conditions are more favorable. A key process in sponge development from hatched gemmules is the construction of the silica skeleton. Silica spicules form the structural support for the three-dimensional filtration system the sponge uses to filter food particles from Submitted 30 August 2018 ambient water.
    [Show full text]
  • Nabs 2004 Final
    CURRENT AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON BENTHIC BIOLOGY 2004 Published August, 2005 North American Benthological Society 2 FOREWORD “Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic Biology” is published annu- ally for the members of the North American Benthological Society, and summarizes titles of articles published during the previous year. Pertinent titles prior to that year are also included if they have not been cited in previous reviews. I wish to thank each of the members of the NABS Literature Review Committee for providing bibliographic information for the 2004 NABS BIBLIOGRAPHY. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Wohlgemuth, INHS Librarian, and library assis- tants Anna FitzSimmons, Jessica Beverly, and Elizabeth Day, for their assistance in putting the 2004 bibliography together. Membership in the North American Benthological Society may be obtained by contacting Ms. Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, Uni- versity of Minnesota, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811. Phone: 218/720-4251. email:[email protected]. Dr. Donald W. Webb, Editor NABS Bibliography Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-6846 e-mail: [email protected] 3 CONTENTS PERIPHYTON: Christine L. Weilhoefer, Environmental Science and Resources, Portland State University, Portland, O97207.................................5 ANNELIDA (Oligochaeta, etc.): Mark J. Wetzel, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820.................................................................................................................6 ANNELIDA (Hirudinea): Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Re- search Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268- 0001 and William E.
    [Show full text]