DOCSLIB.ORG

Copy of Censusdata

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

P. 30 Means of Transportation to Work for workers 16 years and over [16] City State Total: Bicycle % who bicycle Mackinac Island city Michigan 217 132 60.83% Stanford CDP California 5,711 2,381 41.69% Tangier town Virginia 250 66 26.40% Mason village Wisconsin 21 5 23.81% Ocean Beach village New York 64 14 21.88% Sand City city California 132 28 21.21% Isla Vista CDP California 8,360 1,642 19.64% Unity Village village Missouri 153 29 18.95% Hunter city Kansas 31 5 16.13% Crested Butte town Colorado 1,096 176 16.06% Davis city California 31,165 4,493 14.42% Rocky Ridge town Utah 160 23 14.38% Pelican city Alaska 77 11 14.29% Key West city Florida 14,611 1,856 12.70% Saltaire village New York 24 3 12.50% Keenes village Illinois 41 5 12.20% Longville city Minnesota 42 5 11.90% Stock Island CDP Florida 2,152 250 11.62% Goodland CDP Florida 74 8 10.81% Agenda city Kansas 28 3 10.71% Volant borough Pennsylvania 56 6 10.71% Tenakee Springs city Alaska 39 4 10.26% Tumacacori-Carmen C Arizona 199 20 10.05% Bearcreek town Montana 52 5 9.62% Briny Breezes town Florida 84 8 9.52% Barada village Nebraska 21 2 9.52% Layton city Florida 117 11 9.40% Evansville CDP Alaska 22 2 9.09% Nimrod city Minnesota 22 2 9.09% Nimrod city Minnesota 22 2 9.09% San Geronimo CDP California 245 22 8.98% Smith Island CDP Maryland 148 13 8.78% Laie CDP Hawaii 2,103 176 8.37% Hickam Housing CDP Hawaii 2,386 196 8.21% Slickville CDP Pennsylvania 112 9 8.04% Laughlin AFB CDP Texas 1,150 91 7.91% Minidoka city Idaho 38 3 7.89% Sykeston city North Dakota 51 4 7.84% Shipshewana town Indiana 310 24 7.74% Playita comunidad (Sa Puerto Rico 145 11 7.59% Dillard city Georgia 94 7 7.45% Putnam town Oklahoma 27 2 7.41% Fire Island CDP New York 191 14 7.33% Shorewood Hills village Wisconsin 779 57 7.32% Grenora city North Dakota 97 7 7.22% Buffalo Gap town South Dakota 56 4 7.14% Corvallis city Oregon 23,475 1,669 7.11% Boulder city Colorado 53,828 3,708 6.89% Gunnison city Colorado 2,825 189 6.69% Chistochina CDP Alaska 30 2 6.67% Grand Canyon Village Arizona 1,059 70 6.61% P. 30 Means of Transportation to Work for workers 16 years and over [16] Oberlin city Ohio 4,041 264 6.53% Mesa CDP California 139 9 6.47% Odessa town Delaware 172 11 6.40% Owl Ranch-Amargosa Texas 97 6 6.19% Craig city Iowa 65 4 6.15% Twin Lakes CDP California 2,978 183 6.15% Elsah village Illinois 409 25 6.11% East Ellijay city Georgia 344 21 6.10% Port Costa CDP California 99 6 6.06% Edison village Nebraska 50 3 6.00% Pritchett town Colorado 50 3 6.00% Ocracoke CDP North Carolina 351 21 5.98% La Parguera comunida Puerto Rico 302 18 5.96% Grandin city North Dakota 101 6 5.94% University Heights city Iowa 576 34 5.90% Aspen city Colorado 3,860 227 5.88% Red Level town Alabama 224 13 5.80% Mizpah city Minnesota 35 2 5.71% Lahaina CDP Hawaii 4,562 260 5.70% Branson town Colorado 53 3 5.66% Missoula city Montana 29,805 1,682 5.64% Austwell city Texas 71 4 5.63% Palo Alto city California 30,950 1,742 5.63% Berkeley city California 54,674 3,071 5.62% Forest Home CDP New York 431 24 5.57% Eugene city Oregon 67,823 3,764 5.55% Rockleigh borough New Jersey 109 6 5.50% Five Points CDP Florida 273 15 5.49% Woods Hole CDP Massachusetts 447 24 5.37% Fountain Run city Kentucky 75 4 5.33% Port Townsend city Washington 3,776 201 5.32% Mount Hebron CDP California 38 2 5.26% Odanah CDP Wisconsin 114 6 5.26% Gainesville city Florida 43,060 2,261 5.25% Arcata city California 8,091 419 5.18% Ocean Park CDP Washington 367 19 5.18% Carrboro town North Carolina 10,066 520 5.17% Chico city California 26,947 1,390 5.16% Boys Town village Nebraska 78 4 5.13% Shirley CDP Massachusetts 767 39 5.08% North Randall village Ohio 512 26 5.08% North Randall village Ohio 512 26 5.08% Ellensburg city Washington 6,815 346 5.08% Moss Landing CDP California 198 10 5.05% Sewanee CDP Tennessee 1,000 50 5.00% Shell Knob CDP Missouri 401 20 4.99% Bouse CDP Arizona 162 8 4.94% Reeves village Louisiana 61 3 4.92% Topeka town Indiana 590 29 4.92% Chester town Montana 389 19 4.88% West Cape May borou New Jersey 472 23 4.87% Springdale town Utah 228 11 4.82% P. 30 Means of Transportation to Work for workers 16 years and over [16] Marathon city Florida 5,133 247 4.81% Pine Manor CDP Florida 1,608 77 4.79% Tesuque CDP New Mexico 439 21 4.78% Adrian city Texas 63 3 4.76% Green River city Utah 408 19 4.66% Corunna town Indiana 108 5 4.63% Black Hawk city Colorado 88 4 4.55% Telluride town Colorado 1,525 69 4.52% Port Aransas city Texas 1,647 74 4.49% Beach Haven borough New Jersey 513 23 4.48% Shackelford CDP California 1,028 46 4.47% Urbana city Illinois 17,441 778 4.46% Volcano CDP Hawaii 967 43 4.45% Spragueville city Iowa 45 2 4.44% Kohler village Wisconsin 925 41 4.43% Burnt Store Marina CD Florida 271 12 4.43% Santa Cruz city California 28,971 1,282 4.43% Hammond city Minnesota 113 5 4.42% New Bremen village Ohio 1,608 71 4.42% New Bremen village Ohio 1,608 71 4.42% Indian Village town Indiana 68 3 4.41% Hodgkins village Illinois 998 44 4.41% Fort Collins city Colorado 64,531 2,836 4.39% Riverdale city North Dakota 114 5 4.39% Inyokern CDP California 391 17 4.35% Oak Ridge village Louisiana 69 3 4.35% Captiva CDP Florida 139 6 4.32% Opal Cliffs CDP California 3,601 155 4.30% Hanover CDP New Hampshire 3,231 139 4.30% Sumas city Washington 397 17 4.28% Hartleton borough Pennsylvania 117 5 4.27% Aguilita comunidad Puerto Rico 893 38 4.26% Durango city Colorado 7,236 303 4.19% Pawleys Island town South Carolina 72 3 4.17% Glen Ellen CDP California 387 16 4.13% Rehoboth Beach city Delaware 655 27 4.12% Greybull town Wyoming 802 33 4.11% Fort Yates city North Dakota 73 3 4.11% Woden city Iowa 122 5 4.10% Bolinas CDP California 708 29 4.10% North Redington Beac Florida 563 23 4.09% North Redington Beac Florida 563 23 4.09% Twin Bridges town Montana 147 6 4.08% Albany city California 8,568 349 4.07% Hoven town South Dakota 296 12 4.05% Grygla city Minnesota 99 4 4.04% Ryegate town Montana 99 4 4.04% Bozeman city Montana 15,434 620 4.02% Cumberland Gap town Tennessee 75 3 4.00% Nanwalek CDP Alaska 75 3 4.00% Nanwalek CDP Alaska 75 3 4.00% Ganado CDP Arizona 404 16 3.96% P. 30 Means of Transportation to Work for workers 16 years and over [16] Armington village Illinois 153 6 3.92% Monroe village Nebraska 153 6 3.92% Navassa town North Carolina 153 6 3.92% Navassa town North Carolina 153 6 3.92% South El Monte city California 7,141 279 3.91% Cambridge city Massachusetts 54,959 2,143 3.90% Wisdom CDP Montana 77 3 3.90% Lone Pine CDP California 669 26 3.89% Fall River Mills CDP California 206 8 3.88% East Thermopolis town Wyoming 103 4 3.88% Troy city Montana 335 13 3.88% Iron Horse CDP California 129 5 3.88% North Loup village Nebraska 155 6 3.87% North Loup village Nebraska 155 6 3.87% Cape May Point borou New Jersey 52 2 3.85% Stratford town South Dakota 52 2 3.85% Wesley city Iowa 209 8 3.83% Neche city North Dakota 183 7 3.83% Neche city North Dakota 183 7 3.83% Currie city Minnesota 79 3 3.80% Farwell village Nebraska 79 3 3.80% Little Creek town Delaware 79 3 3.80% Maddock city North Dakota 159 6 3.77% Stinson Beach CDP California 453 17 3.75% Fort Myers Beach town Florida 2,455 92 3.75% Crescent City North CD California 1,536 57 3.71% Flagstaff city Arizona 28,494 1,057 3.71% Lynch village Nebraska 108 4 3.70% Lynch village Nebraska 108 4 3.70% Avalon city California 1,598 59 3.69% Menlo Park city California 15,237 562 3.69% Hosmer city South Dakota 109 4 3.67% Surrency town Georgia 109 4 3.67% Rocklake city North Dakota 55 2 3.64% Hanalei CDP Hawaii 221 8 3.62% Yosemite Valley CDP California 166 6 3.61% Sitka city and borough Alaska 4,420 159 3.60% San Luis Obispo city California 21,684 779 3.59% Yale village Illinois 28 1 3.57% Elkton village Michigan 394 14 3.55% Cave Junction city Oregon 395 14 3.54% Lee town Florida 113 4 3.54% Sabana comunidad Puerto Rico 396 14 3.54% Kernville CDP California 481 17 3.53% Stevens Point city Wisconsin 12,286 434 3.53% Baroda village Michigan 425 15 3.53% Peconic CDP New York 454 16 3.52% Grove City city Minnesota 286 10 3.50% Harrold town South Dakota 86 3 3.49% North Stanwood CDP Washington 258 9 3.49% North Stanwood CDP Washington 258 9 3.49% Renwick city Iowa 144 5 3.47% P.
Recommended publications
  • Connecting with Our Future from the Ground Up

    Connecting with Our Future from the Ground Up

    Connecting With Our Future From The Ground Up 2018-19 ANNUAL REPORT Message from the CEO Dear Friends, Since joining Groundwork Jacksonville just over two years ago, I have We launched our first major campaign to raise $1.45 million for been overwhelmed by the outpouring of support we have received from design of the Model Project and the McCoys Creek branches, the all facets of the community. People and organizations that understand western-most portion of the creek not included in the City’s plans. access to clean green spaces and recreation, equitable housing and To date, we are two-thirds of the way to reaching that goal. economic opportunity, and an authentic connection to their community and to one another is vital for our city to thrive. Our Green Team Youth Corp Summer Apprenticeship continues to be a model not only among Groundwork Trusts but also for youth This past fiscal year, Groundwork has made tremendous leaps forward programs in our community. In addition to other important projects in our vision to build the Emerald Trail and restore our urban creeks. along the Emerald Trail, these teens were instrumental in helping RouxArt create the Sugar Hill Mosaic, the first of many public art As the City’s partner, Groundwork is spearheading the Emerald Trail with displays we intend to create. the first segment — the 1.3 mile Model Project — to be completed next year. I am especially grateful that the City has earmarked Emerald Trail And lastly, we launched the CREST program which was inspired construction funds in every year of the City’s Capital Improvement Plan by residents asking for ways to serve their community and improve (CIP) to maintain the trail’s exciting momentum.
  • National Competition Report Q2 2017

    National Competition Report Q2 2017

    NATIONAL COMPETITION QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL– JUNE 2017 BELGIUM basis of their “Best and Final Offer.” Third, Infrabel issued individual calls for specific orders within the This section reviews developments under Book IV of the terms and conditions of the framework agreement. The Belgian Code of Economic Law (“CEL”) on the selected companies had to submit their best offer for Protection of Competition, which is enforced by the each call, and the orders were awarded to the lowest Belgian Competition Authority (“the BCA”). Within the bidder. BCA, the Prosecutor General and its staff of prosecutors (collectively, the “Auditorate”) investigate In 2013, the Auditorate started investigating this public alleged restrictive practices and concentrations, while procurement following ABB’s leniency application. the Competition College (the “College”) functions as The investigation revealed that the bidders had agreed the decision-making body. Prior to September 6, 2013, to allocate the orders placed by Infrabel amongst Belgian competition law was codified in the Act on the themselves. For each call, they exchanged price Protection of Economic Competition of September 15, information and instructions to ensure that the 2006 (“APEC”) and enforced by the Belgian pre-designated participant would present the lowest Competition Authority, then composed of the price and win the tender. The Auditorate found that Directorate General for Competition and the these practices had started in 2010–2011 and continued Competition Council. When relevant, entries in this until June 2016. The Auditorate notified its objections report will refer to the former sub-bodies of the BCA. to the companies in August 2016, and settlement talks began a month later.
  • Underrepresented Communities Historic Resource Survey Report

    Underrepresented Communities Historic Resource Survey Report

    City of Madison, Wisconsin Underrepresented Communities Historic Resource Survey Report By Jennifer L. Lehrke, AIA, NCARB, Rowan Davidson, Associate AIA and Robert Short, Associate AIA Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 and Jason Tish Archetype Historic Property Consultants 2714 Lafollette Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53704 Project Sponsoring Agency City of Madison Department of Planning and Community and Economic Development 215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard Madison, Wisconsin 53703 2017-2020 Acknowledgments The activity that is the subject of this survey report has been financed with local funds from the City of Madison Department of Planning and Community and Economic Development. The contents and opinions contained in this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the city, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the City of Madison. The authors would like to thank the following persons or organizations for their assistance in completing this project: City of Madison Richard B. Arnesen Satya Rhodes-Conway, Mayor Patrick W. Heck, Alder Heather Stouder, Planning Division Director Joy W. Huntington Bill Fruhling, AICP, Principal Planner Jason N. Ilstrup Heather Bailey, Preservation Planner Eli B. Judge Amy L. Scanlon, Former Preservation Planner Arvina Martin, Alder Oscar Mireles Marsha A. Rummel, Alder (former member) City of Madison Muriel Simms Landmarks Commission Christina Slattery Anna Andrzejewski, Chair May Choua Thao Richard B. Arnesen Sheri Carter, Alder (former member) Elizabeth Banks Sergio Gonzalez (former member) Katie Kaliszewski Ledell Zellers, Alder (former member) Arvina Martin, Alder David W.J. McLean Maurice D. Taylor Others Lon Hill (former member) Tanika Apaloo Stuart Levitan (former member) Andrea Arenas Marsha A.

  • The Artists' View of Seattle

    WHERE DOES SEATTLE’S CREATIVE COMMUNITY GO FOR INSPIRATION? Allow us to introduce some of our city’s resident artists, who share with you, in their own words, some of their favorite places and why they choose to make Seattle their home. Known as one of the nation’s cultural centers, Seattle has more arts-related businesses and organizations per capita than any other metropolitan area in the United States, according to a recent study by Americans for the Arts. Our city pulses with the creative energies of thousands of artists who call this their home. In this guide, twenty-four painters, sculptors, writers, poets, dancers, photographers, glass artists, musicians, filmmakers, actors and more tell you about their favorite places and experiences. James Turrell’s Light Reign, Henry Art Gallery ©Lara Swimmer 2 3 BYRON AU YONG Composer WOULD YOU SHARE SOME SPECIAL CHILDHOOD MEMORIES ABOUT WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO SEATTLE? GROWING UP IN SEATTLE? I moved into my particular building because it’s across the street from Uptown I performed in musical theater as a kid at a venue in the Seattle Center. I was Espresso. One of the real draws of Seattle for me was the quality of the coffee, I nine years old, and I got paid! I did all kinds of shows, and I also performed with must say. the Civic Light Opera. I was also in the Northwest Boy Choir and we sang this Northwest Medley, and there was a song to Ivar’s restaurant in it. When I was HOW DOES BEING A NON-DRIVER IMPACT YOUR VIEW OF THE CITY? growing up, Ivar’s had spokespeople who were dressed up in clam costumes with My favorite part about walking is that you come across things that you would pass black leggings.
  • Diagnóstico Socioambiental Para El Programa Del Manejo Integral Del Agua De La Cuenca Del Río Tijuana

    Diagnóstico Socioambiental Para El Programa Del Manejo Integral Del Agua De La Cuenca Del Río Tijuana

    Diagnóstico socioambiental para el Programa del Manejo Integral del Agua de la Cuenca del Río Tijuana Diagnóstico socioambiental para el Programa del Manejo Integral del Agua de la Cuenca del Río Tijuana Elaborado por: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte Coordinador Carlos A. de la Parra Rentería Colaboradores Mayra Patricia Melgar López Alfonso Camberos Urbina Tijuana, Baja California, 15 de marzo de 2017. i TABLA DE CONTENIDO PARTE I. MARCO DE REFERENCIA .......................................................... 1 UBICACIÓN, DELIMITACIÓN Y DESCRIPCIÓN GENERAL DE LA REGIÓN ................................................................. 1 La Cuenca del Río Tijuana .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Antecedentes Históricos .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Localización ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Descripción de los municipios y el condado que integran la CRT ..................................................................................... 5 Características físicas ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 POBLACIÓN EN LA CRT ......................................................................................................................................
  • This City of Ours

    This City of Ours

    THIS CITY OF OURS By J. WILLIS SAYRE For the illustrations used in this book the author expresses grateful acknowledgment to Mrs. Vivian M. Carkeek, Charles A. Thorndike and R. M. Kinnear. Copyright, 1936 by J. W. SAYRE rot &?+ *$$&&*? *• I^JJMJWW' 1 - *- \£*- ; * M: . * *>. f* j*^* */ ^ *** - • CHIEF SEATTLE Leader of his people both in peace and war, always a friend to the whites; as an orator, the Daniel Webster of his race. Note this excerpt, seldom surpassed in beauty of thought and diction, from his address to Governor Stevens: Why should I mourn at the untimely fate of my people? Tribe follows tribe, and nation follows nation, like the waves of the sea. It is the order of nature and regret is useless. Your time of decay may be distant — but it will surely come, for even the White Man whose God walked and talked with him as friend with friend cannot be exempt from the common destiny. We may be brothers after all. Let the White Man be just and deal kindly with my people, for the dead are not powerless. Dead — I say? There is no death. Only a change of worlds. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1. BELIEVE IT OR NOT! 1 2. THE ROMANCE OF THE WATERFRONT . 5 3. HOW OUR RAILROADS GREW 11 4. FROM HORSE CARS TO MOTOR BUSES . 16 5. HOW SEATTLE USED TO SEE—AND KEEP WARM 21 6. INDOOR ENTERTAINMENTS 26 7. PLAYING FOOTBALL IN PIONEER PLACE . 29 8. STRANGE "IFS" IN SEATTLE'S HISTORY . 34 9. HISTORICAL POINTS IN FIRST AVENUE . 41 10.
  • Cross Border Survey

    Cross Border Survey

    THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents T ABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents. i List of Tables . iii List of Figures. iv Introduction. 1 Motivation for Study . 1 Overview of Methodology . 1 Organization of Report. 3 Acknowledgments . 3 Disclaimer . 3 About True North . 3 Key Findings . 4 Cross-border trips originate close to the border in México.. 4 Trip destinations in the U.S. cluster close to the border. 4 Shopping is the most common reason for crossing the border. 4 The average crosser visits multiple destinations in the U.S. and for a mix of reasons. 4 Most U.S. destinations are reached by driving alone or in a carpool. 5 The typical U.S. visit lasts less than one day. 5 Proximity to the border also shapes U.S. resident trips to México. 5 U.S. residents generally visit México to socialize. 5 The average México visit lasts two days.. 6 Interest in using the Otay Mesa East tolled border crossing was conditioned by several factors. 6 The current study findings are similar to the 2010 study findings . 6 México Resident: U.S. Trip Details. 8 Trip Origin in México . 8 Primary Destination in United States. 10 Primary U.S. Trip Purpose . 10 Duration of U.S. Visit . 12 Miles traveled in U.S. 13 Number of Destinations in the U.S.. 14 Time of Stops in U.S. 14 Duration of Stops in U.S. 18 Location of Destinations in San Diego County. 21 Purpose of Stops in San Diego County . 28 Mode of Travel in San Diego County .
  • Yiannis N. Krallis Director General 11/29/2007 1

    Yiannis N. Krallis Director General 11/29/2007 1

    CHIPITACHIPITA RussiaRussia Yiannis N. Krallis Director General 1 11/29/2007 BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND • Chipita is a Greek origin multinational Company producing and commercializing packed flour based snacks such as: croissants, cakes and bread chips with turnover in excess of 1.5 billion Euro. • Established in 1973, Chipita brands are presented in more than 35 countries with production facilities in Greece, Russia, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Mexico, Portugal, Egypt, the leader in all markets where present. • The main international umbrella brand is 7Days. 11/29/2007 2 COMPANYCOMPANY PROFILEPROFILE As of September 1st, 2006, Chipita merged with: ¾ DELTA, Number One in the diary industry ¾ GOODY`S, Number One in the foodservice industry, and ¾ GENERAL FROZEN FOODS “BARBA STATHIS”, Number One in the frozen food industry to establish VIVARTIA - Number One food company in Greece, ranking 35th in Europe with 35 factory units throughout 16 countries, and over 13 000 employees. 11/29/2007 3 BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND • In Russia, Chipita is a Leader of croissants under 7Days brand (with almost 80% market share), presented in main soft cakes segments. • Chipita manufactures 50 SKUs mainly croissants, cakes, pastes and salted snacks; and contracts for TANDER and DANONE. • Chipita Russia employs 750 people • Business activities: all Russia regions, • Commercial companies in: Ukraine, Byelorussia, • Exports activities: Serbia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary • Production facilities located in Saint Petersburg. 11/29/2007 4 CHIPITACHIPITALOGISTICS RUSSIARUSSIA Can one explain how a small, by the vast, Russian Geography Standards Company, can survive this Supply Chain and Logistics Marathon? We have been accused of bad service, of low deliveries ratios, we have even been de-listed from KA at times.
  • Ir a →R E Q U I S I T

    Ir a →R E Q U I S I T

    No. 34 Descripción del servicio Nombre del servicio: SUSPENSIÓN TEMPORAL DEL SERVICIO (CONOCIDO COMÚNMENTE COMO BAJA DE CUENTA) Ir a R E Q U I S I T O S Tiempo de respuesta: Variable Costos aplicables $ 500 pesos Se paga el importe por concepto de retiro de medidor y/o taponeo de toma. Cuando el usuario reactive su cuenta, el trámite no tendrá costo alguno. De acuerdo al décimo párrafo del ARTÍCULO 9 de la Ley de Ingresos del Estado de Baja California, vigente: Las tarifas y cuotas contenidas en cada una de las secciones de este Capítulo, se actualizarán mensualmente, a partir del mes de febrero, con el factor que se obtenga de dividir el Índice Nacional de Precios al Consumidor, que se publique en el Diario Oficial de la Federación por el Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, o por la dependencia federal que en sustitución de ésta lo publique, del último mes inmediato anterior al mes por el cual se hace el ajuste, entre el citado índice del penúltimo mes inmediato anterior al del mismo mes que se actualiza. Objetivo del servicio Suspensión temporal de los servicios es para aquellos usuarios que no requieran de los mismos. Área responsable: Coordinación Comercial correspondiente. Coordinación que realiza el Centro de Atención al Público correspondiente. servicio: Comprobante a obtener: Documento del pago del trámite. Vigencia: No aplica. Artículo 9, párrafo 7, de la Ley de Ingresos del Estado de Baja California para el ejercicio Fundamento jurídico: fiscal del año 2021, publicada en el Periódico Oficial del Estado de Baja California en fecha 28 de diciembre de 2020.
  • 2013 San Diego

    2013 San Diego

    BINATIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA January 14, 2013 Binational Hazardous Materials Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Among the County Of San Diego, the City of San Diego, California, and the City of Tijuana, Baja California January 14, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2005-Present ...................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2003 .................................................................................................... 6 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.0 TIJUANA/SAN DIEGO BORDER REGION ................................................................. 25 1.1 General Aspects of the Region ........................................................................................ 25 1.1.1 Historical and Cultural Background ................................................................ 25 1.1.2 Geographic Location
  • Water, Capitalism, and Urbanization in the Californias, 1848-1982

    Water, Capitalism, and Urbanization in the Californias, 1848-1982

    TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 14, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Hillar Yllo Schwertner All Rights Reserved ii TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: John Tutino, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This is a history of Tijuandiego—the transnational metropolis set at the intersection of the United States, Mexico, and the Pacific World. Separately, Tijuana and San Diego constitute distinct but important urban centers in their respective nation-states. Taken as a whole, Tijuandiego represents the southwestern hinge of North America. It is the continental crossroads of cultures, economies, and environments—all in a single, physical location. In other words, Tijuandiego represents a new urban frontier; a space where the abstractions of the nation-state are manifested—and tested—on the ground. In this dissertation, I adopt a transnational approach to Tijuandiego’s water history, not simply to tell “both sides” of the story, but to demonstrate that neither side can be understood in the absence of the other. I argue that the drawing of the international boundary in 1848 established an imbalanced political ecology that favored San Diego and the United States over Tijuana and Mexico. The land and water resources wrested by the United States gave it tremendous geographical and ecological advantages over its reeling southern neighbor, advantages which would be used to strengthen U.S.
  • Geographic Classification, 2003. 577 Pp. Pdf Icon[PDF – 7.1

    Geographic Classification, 2003. 577 Pp. Pdf Icon[PDF – 7.1

    Instruction Manual Part 8 Vital Records, Geographic Classification, 2003 Vital Statistics Data Preparation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, Maryland October, 2002 VITAL RECORDS GEOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION, 2003 This manual contains geographic codes used by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in processing information from birth, death, and fetal death records. Included are (1) incorporated places identified by the U.S. Bureau of the Census in the 2000 Census of Population and Housing; (2) census designated places, formerly called unincorporated places, identified by the U.S. Bureau of the Census; (3) certain towns and townships; and (4) military installations identified by the Department of Defense and the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The geographic place of occurrence of the vital event is coded to the state and county or county equivalent level; the geographic place of residence is coded to at least the county level. Incorporated places of residence of 10,000 or more population and certain towns or townships defined as urban under special rules also have separate identifying codes. Specific geographic areas are represented by five-digit codes. The first two digits (1-54) identify the state, District of Columbia, or U.S. Possession. The last three digits refer to the county (701-999) or specified urban place (001-699). Information in this manual is presented in two sections for each state. Section I is to be used for classifying occurrence and residence when the reporting of the geographic location is complete.