DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigation Hydrometeorological Regime of the Barents and White Seas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Investigation Hydrometeorological Regime of the Barents and White Seas «Living Planet Symposium 2016» Prague, Czech Republic, 9-13 May 2016 Based on Satellite Altimetry Data Geophysical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences Sergey A. Lebedev [email protected] [email protected] G FO T Kanin Nos The White Sea is a semi-enclosed mediterranean sea (Fig. 1b). rac k 1 The sea border with the Barents Sea is a line joining Cape 65 E Calibration/Validation Wind Speed R The Barents and White seas S a l Svyatoy Nos (northeastern coast of Kola Peninsula) with Cape & u E s T N 68° r n E a V i Kanin Nos (northwestern extremity of Kanin Peninsula). The T c n R I r k S a S A e c 5 & 5 T P k The Barents Sea is one of the shelf Arctic seas. It is located on 8 northern part of the sea is called the Voronka (funnel). The E 816 n N Kola i V n I the continental European shelf between northern coast of southern and central parts of the White Sea called the Basin are In the framework of the ALTICORE project, the consistency between altimeter- S Peninsula a A K T T A 5 4 Europe and three archipelagoes – Novaya Zemlya, Franz Josef the largest and deepest parts of the sea. There are also several 2 7 derived wind speed and measurements on coastal meteorological stations was S I 0 0 k K V k c a T an N r d ac T A Land and Spitsbergen (Fig. 1a). Its open water area is large and shallow bays in the area, namely the Dvinsky, Onega, al E r Mezen checked. Satellite-derived wind data used were obtained from the RADS data base. O S a T I 797 k & F Mozhovets Is. 2 3 sha G V k Bay S N B ac approximately 1,424,000 km and total volume is 322,000 km . R E r Mezen and Kandalaksha bays. The Gorlo (neck) is a narrow For the comparison, 30 MS on the Barents Sea coast and 21 MS on the White Sea a E y & T S The Barents Sea shelf is rather deep. More than 50% of the strait connecting the Basin and Voronka. The total water coast were selected. As an example, we show results of the comparison for two MS R E 66° M 2 e z area has a depth of 200-500 m. The average depth is 222 m, the surface area is 90,873 km including islands, and the total – Kem’ Port (White Sea) and Kanin Nos (Barents Sea). G e FO n k 061 3 Tr rac R a & J1 T iv maximum depth in the Norwegian trench reaches 513 m and in volume is 6,000 km including also the Voronka area opening The ERS & ENVISAT, GFO and T/P & J1 satellite tracks, which were used when ck T/P e 4 r 25 Solovetsky the Franz Josef Land straits it exceeds 600 m. The Barents Sea to the Barents Sea. Thus the White Sea covers approximately obtaining satellite-derived wind speed data for Kem’ Port and Kanin Nos are shown Islands 2 Kem’-Port Dvinsky watershed area is 668,000 km large. The total river runoff is 6% of the total open water area of both seas and comprises only in Fig. 3. Examples of altimeter and observed (in-situ) data on wind speed and Bay 3 O n 163 km /yr, 80-90% of it falls on southeastern region of the 2% of the total volume of marine water, but it assumes more corresponding scatter plots for these MSs are given in Figs. 4, respectively. e g a sea. The largest river flow-ing into the Barents Sea is the than half of the river runoff in the region. The White Sea B In the cases of both Kem’ Port and Kanin Nos (Fig. 3) MS databases for 2000-2007 a Sev y erna 2 ya D Pechora River which has about a half of watershed area watershed area is 729,000 km (Atlas of Arctic 1985). The total v were used. Altimeter wind speed values for Kem’ Port were in most cases i n 2 3 64° a 3 O 322,000 km ; its runoff is 130 km /yr. The river runoff is river runoff is 259 km /yr that is about 4% of the total amount n noticeably less than meteo ones and correlation between them was practically e g R R a i iv ve essentially re-flected in hydrological conditions only in a of the White Sea water volume. The main rivers are the absent (r = 0.16). Influence of land may be supposed as a possible reason of such er r southeastern part of the sea. Therefore this area is sometimes Severnaya Dvina, Onega and Mezen having runoff of 111, 18 poor correlation. Better correlation (r = 0.45) was observed in the Kanin Nos case. 35° 40° 45° referred to as the Pechora Sea. and 26 km3/yr correspondingly. Improvement in correlation between meteo and altimeter data on wind speed can be obtained when using decomposition of the winds in four quadrants according to Fig. 3. ERS & ENVISAT, GFO and T/P & J1 satellites wind direction relative to coastline direction. An example of its application for the tracks in the White and Barents seas which were used for Kanin Nos case is shown in Fig. 5. The reference line was chosen to be parallel to the comparative analysis between altimetric and MS in- the axis of this Peninsula. situ data. Red circles mark locations of MSs. Cape Kanin Nos a) Franz Josef Land b) Polar GMO Cape im. E.T.Krenkelja Svyatoy a Nos l u Spitsbergen 68° s n 79° i n Voronka e P a) b) Barentsburg n Kola i Great n Bank Peninsula a Barents Kandalaksha K Russkaya Gavan K en Sea a Umba rg nd be al Mezen ts ak pi a Sosnovets Mozhovets Is. S nk sha Bay a Central y 75° B l B Bank m a o y rl Bear Is. e o N Z G o gh h M r ou c 66° tr e . T n w Is re z ear e B T n S l a e ra Basin e t y Kara g n R e i a a v i e C r a v Solovetsky n o Sea Islands N Kem’-Port Dvinsky Hohhingsvarg 71° Solovki Bay O Vardo n e Bakaritsa g Pechora a Kolguev Is. Severodvinsk Pechenga Kyslogybskaya Sea B a Se Polyarnuy ver Teriberka Bugrino y nay Cape a Murmansk Kanin Nos Tobseda D Varandey v Cape i Cape n Fig. 4. Scatter plot of observed versus GFO altimeter data for Kem’ Port (a) and Kanin Nos (b). Svyatoy Nos Onega a 64° a W l Segeysiy u Konstantinovskiy s S n Kola i h Shar n O Iokanga e i e P n a te ra e n Peninsula i ho g R n Cape c r R a e e a i Indiga P iv i v K Mikulkin R v e er r 67° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 35° 40° 45° Fig. 5. Scheme of decomposition of wind directions in the Calibration/Validation Sea Surface four quadrants (Q1-Q4) in relation to the orientation of the coastline for the Kanin Nos case. The appropriate Fig. 1. Maps of the Barents (a) and the White (b) seas. Dashed lines show boundaries of the seas and their internal parts. correlation coefficients between wind speed from altimetry Circles mark tide gauges location.. Height and in-situ MS records are shown in the scheme. Arrows show prevailing wind direction for each quadrant. The consistency between altimeter sea surface height (SSH) data acquired by the satellites T/P, ERS-1/2, ENVISAT, GFO and J1, and measurements of 18 TGs 0 located in the Barents Sea and 8 TGs – in the White Sea was investigated (Fig. 1). 4 ) Meteorological conditions in the Barents Sea are determined by of seasonal variations in the White Sea level is observed in the m Vardo TG Processing of satellite altimetry data included calculation of sea surface height c ( 30 ERS-2 & ENVISAT y atmospheric cyclones that are formed in the North Atlantic and estuary zones of the Onega and Severnaya Dvina rivers and l anomaly (SSHA) with using all corrections without tidal and inverse barometer a m 20 move to the Barents Sea. In winter, southwesterly and southerly may reach 30-60 cm. o correction. Then, for every cycle of the selected satellite passes, spatial coordinates n A winds prevail in the southern part of the sea, whereas Sea level variations related to storm surge are formed by strong t of the point nearest to the concrete TG location (within 15 miles) were determined. 10 h g i southeasterly and easterly winds are most frequent in the winds associated with passage of intense atmospheric cyclones. For the Barents Sea, correlation between SSHA derived from altimetry and tide e H 0 e northern regions. Monthly mean wind speed in the southern The western and northwestern cyclones dominate and amount gauge data can be fairly high (> 0.85) when using ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT data. For c a f r regions (in particular, nearby Kanin Nos) reaches about 10 m/s, to 88% from their total number. During the extreme situations u GFO data the correlations are noticeably lower, probably due to orbit errors and -10 S a to the north it decreases to 6 m/s.
Recommended publications
  • For Classification and Construction of Ships (Rccs)

    For Classification and Construction of Ships (Rccs)

    RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SHIPS (RCCS) Part 0 CLASSIFICATION 4 RCCS. Part 0 “Classification” 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 The present Part of the Rules for the materials for the ships except for small craft Classification and Construction of Inland and used for non-for-profit purposes. The re- Combined (River-Sea) Navigation Ships (here quirements of the present Rules are applicable and in all other Parts — Rules) defines the to passenger ships, tankers, pushboats, tug- basic terms and definitions applicable for all boats, ice breakers and industrial ships of Parts of the Rules, general procedure of ship‘s overall length less than 20 m. class adjudication and composing of class The requirements of the present Rules are formula, as well as contains information on not applicable to small craft, pleasure ships, the documents issued by Russian River Regis- sports sailing ships, military and border- ter (hereinafter — River Register) and on the security ships, ships with nuclear power units, areas and seasons of operation of the ships floating drill rigs and other floating facilities. with the River Register class. However, the River Register develops and 1.2 When performing its classification and issues corresponding regulations and other survey activities the River Register is governed standards being part of the Rules for particu- by the requirements of applicable interna- lar types of ships (small craft used for com- tional agreements of Russian Federation, mercial purposes, pleasure and sports sailing Regulations on Classification and Survey of ships, ekranoplans etc.) and other floating Ships, as well as the Rules specified in Clause facilities (pontoon bridges etc.).
  • Seiches in the Semiclosed Seas of the Continental Shelf

    Seiches in the Semiclosed Seas of the Continental Shelf

    International Journal of Oceanography & Aquaculture MEDWIN PUBLISHERS ISSN: 2577-4050 Committed to Create Value for Researchers Seiches in the Semiclosed Seas of the Continental Shelf Inzhebeikin Yu I* Research Article Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia Volume 4 Issue 3 Received Date: September 18, 2020 *Corresponding author: Published Date: October 23, 2020 Center, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, Email: [email protected] Inzhebeikin Yu I, Russian Academy of Sciences, Southern Scientific DOI: 10.23880/ijoac-16000199 Abstract Seiche movements in two small areas of semi-closed seas on the Continental Shelf (the White Sea and the Sea of Azov) with very different morphometric characteristics are considered in this paper. In addition, tidal movements are highly developed in the White sea, while in the Azov sea tides are virtually absent. We’ve used morphometric characteristics of the seas, including the ones recently obtained by the Azov Sea, as well as methods of numerical hydrodynamic simulation based on the theory of shallow water, and spectral analysis of the observation data of the sea level fluctuations. Keywords: Continental Shelf; Semi-Closed Seas; White Sea; Sea Of Azov; Seiche; Numerical Hydrodynamic Simulation; Spectral Analysis; Flood Introduction located in the Northern and South-Western boundaries of the European part of Russia respectively (Figure 1). In August 2006, on the Dolzhanskaya spit of the Azov sea, the water level rose sharply, people and cars washed away in the sea, the spit broke in several places. At the same time there was no storm warning. In June 2010 on the Yeisk spit of the same sea of Azov at full calm across the sea suddenly appeared powerful current washed away children, wandering on the spit knee-deep in water.
  • Alexander P. Lisitsyn Liudmila L. Demina Editors the White Sea

    Alexander P. Lisitsyn Liudmila L. Demina Editors the White Sea

    The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry 82 Series Editors: Damià Barceló · Andrey G. Kostianoy Alexander P. Lisitsyn Liudmila L. Demina Editors Sedimentation Processes in the White Sea The White Sea Environment Part II The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Founding Editor: Otto Hutzinger Editors-in-Chief: Damia Barcelo´ • Andrey G. Kostianoy Volume 82 Advisory Editors: Jacob de Boer, Philippe Garrigues, Ji-Dong Gu, Kevin C. Jones, Thomas P. Knepper, Alice Newton, Donald L. Sparks More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/698 Sedimentation Processes in the White Sea The White Sea Environment Part II Volume Editors: Alexander P. Lisitsyn Á Liudmila L. Demina With contributions by T. N. Alexсeeva Á D. F. Budko Á O. M. Dara Á L. L. Demina Á I. V. Dotsenko Á Y. A. Fedorov Á A. A. Klyuvitkin Á A. I. Kochenkova Á M. D. Kravchishina Á A. P. Lisitsyn Á I. A. Nemirovskaya Á Y. A. Novichkova Á A. N. Novigatsky Á A. E. Ovsepyan Á N. V. Politova Á Y. I. Polyakova Á A. E. Rybalko Á V. A. Savitskiy Á L. R. Semyonova Á V. P. Shevchenko Á M. Y. Tokarev Á A. Yu. Lein Á V. A. Zhuravlyov Á A. A. Zimovets Editors Alexander P. Lisitsyn Liudmila L. Demina Shirshov Inst. of Oceanology Shirshov Inst. of Oceanology Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Moscow, Russia ISSN 1867-979X ISSN 1616-864X (electronic) The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ISBN 978-3-030-05110-5 ISBN 978-3-030-05111-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05111-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018964918 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 This work is subject to copyright.
  • Tracing the History of the Pacific Herring Clupea Pallasii in North-East European Seas Hanna M Laakkonen1*, Dmitry L Lajus2, Petr Strelkov2 and Risto Väinölä1

    Tracing the History of the Pacific Herring Clupea Pallasii in North-East European Seas Hanna M Laakkonen1*, Dmitry L Lajus2, Petr Strelkov2 and Risto Väinölä1

    Laakkonen et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:67 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/67 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Phylogeography of amphi-boreal fish: tracing the history of the Pacific herring Clupea pallasii in North-East European seas Hanna M Laakkonen1*, Dmitry L Lajus2, Petr Strelkov2 and Risto Väinölä1 Abstract Background: The relationships between North Atlantic and North Pacific faunas through times have been controlled by the variation of hydrographic circumstances in the intervening Arctic Ocean and Bering Strait. We address the history of trans-Arctic connections in a clade of amphi-boreal pelagic fishes using genealogical information from mitochondrial DNA sequence data. The Pacific and Atlantic herrings (Clupea pallasii and C. harengus) have basically vicarious distributions in the two oceans since pre-Pleistocene times. However, remote populations of C. pallasii are also present in the border waters of the North-East Atlantic in Europe. These populations show considerable regional and life history differentiation and have been recognized in subspecies classification. The chronology of the inter-oceanic invasions and genetic basis of the phenotypic structuring however remain unclear. Results: The Atlantic and Pacific herrings both feature high mtDNA diversities (large long-term population sizes) in their native basins, but an ocean-wide homogeneity of C. harengus is contrasted by deep east-west Pacific subdivision within Pacific C. pallasii. The outpost populations of C. pallasii in NE Europe are identified as members of the western Pacific C. pallasii clade, with some retained inter-oceanic haplotype sharing. They have lost diversity in colonization bottlenecks, but have also thereafter accumulated abundant new variation.
  • Late Pleistocene History?

    Late Pleistocene History?

    Tolokonka on the Severnaya Dvina - A Late Pleistocene history? Field study in the Arkhangelsk region (Архангельская область), northwest Russia Russia Expedition – a SciencePub Project 25th May – 2nd July 2007 written by Udo Müller (Universität Leipzig) to obtain a B.Sc. degree’s equivalent APEX Udo Müller (2007): Tolokonka on the Severnaya Dvina - A Late Pleistocene history? Table of contents Introduction 3 The Late Pleistocene in northwest Russia 6 The Tolokonka section 18 Profile log 21 Interpretation 34 Conclusions 39 Acknowledgements 41 Abbreviations 42 References 43 - 2 - Udo Müller (2007): Tolokonka on the Severnaya Dvina - A Late Pleistocene history? Introduction The Russian North has been subject to many different research expeditions over the last decade, most of them as an integral part of the QUEEN Programme (Quaternary Environment of the Eurasian North), in order to reconstruct the glacial events throughout the Quaternary and their relation to sea-level change and paleoclimate. Fig.1 shows the localities that have been investigated between 1995 and 2002 – river sections along the Severnaya Dvina and its tributaries, the Mezen River Basin, the coasts of the White Sea and the Barents Sea, as well as the Timan Ridge (KJÆR et al. 2006a). Fig. 1. The Arkhangelsk region in NW Russia. Dots mark localities investigated between 1995 and 2002 (KJÆR et al. 2006a). For orientation see frontpage. According to KJÆR et al. (2006a), the Arkhangelsk region represents a key area for the understanding of Late Pleistocene glaciation history, since it was overridden by all three major Eurasian ice sheets: the Scandinavian, the Barents Sea and the Kara Sea ice sheets.
  • Diagonistic Analysis of the Environmental Status

    Diagonistic Analysis of the Environmental Status

    DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENTALSTATUS OF THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME NPA-ARCTIC PROJECT DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC (Advanced Summary) Moscow Scientific World 2011 УДК 91.553.574 ББК 21 Д44 Editor-in-Chief: B.A. Morgunov Д44 Diagnostic analysis of the environmental status of the Russian Arctic (Advanced Summary). – Moscow, Scientific World, 2011. – 172 р. ISBN 978-5-91522-256-5 This diagnostic analysis of the environmental status of the Russian Arctic was performed as part of the implementation of the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and Global Environmental Facility (GEF) Project «Russian Federation: Support to the National Program of Action for Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment» by: A.A. Danilov, A.V. Evseev, V.V. Gordeev, Yu.V. Kochemasov, Yu.S. Lukyanov, V.N. Lystsov, T.I. Moiseenko, O.A. Murashko, I.A. Nemirovskaya, S.A. Patin, A.A. Shekhovtsov, O.N. Shishova, V.I. Solomatin, Yu.P. Sotskov, V.V. Strakhov, A.A. Tishkov, Yu.A. Treger. The advanced summary was prepared by A.M. Bagin, B.P. Melnikov, and S.B. Tambiev. English editor: G. Hough Cover photos were supplied by S.B. Tambiev This publication is not an official document of the Russian Government. Electronic and full versions of the Diagnostic Analysis of Environmental Status of the Russian Arctic are published at http://npa-arctic.ru ISBN 978-5-91522-256-5 © NPA-Arctic Project, 2011 © Mineconomrazvitiya of Russia, 2011 © Scientific World, 2011 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................ 6 Chapter 1. Physical and geographical characteristics of the Russian Arctic .............................................
  • The White Sea Report

    The White Sea Report

    Kolarctic ENPI CBC - Kolarctic salmon project (KO197) – the White Sea Report Summary results from coastal salmon fisheries in the White Sea: timing and origin of salmon catches Sergey Prusov1, Gennadiy Ustyuzhinsky2, Vidar Wennevik3, Juha-Pekka Vähä4, Mikhail Ozerov4, Rogelio Diaz Fernandez4, Eero Niemelä5, Martin-A. Svenning6, Morten Falkegård6, Tiia Kalske7, Bente Christiansen7, Elena Samoylova1, Vladimir Chernov1, Alexander Potutkin1, Artem Tkachenko1 1Knipovich Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO), Murmansk, Russia 2Knipovich Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO), Archangelsk, Russia 3Institute of Marine Research (IMR), Tromsø, Norway 4University of Turku (UTU), Finland 5Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute (FGFRI), Teno River Research Station Utsjoki, Finland 6Norwegian Institute of Nature Research (NINA), Tromsø, Norway 7County Governor of Finnmark (FMFI), Vadsø, Norway Knipovich Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO) The White Sea Report – 2014 Contents Abstract.................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Materials and methods……………………………………………………….…………………………………………….. 6 Study area………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………..… 6 Adult fish sampling…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Fisheries regulations and data………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 Results and discussions………………………………………………………………….………………………………….
  • KAROL PIASECKI Szczecin the WHITE SEA POMORYE and ITS

    KAROL PIASECKI Szczecin the WHITE SEA POMORYE and ITS

    Studia Maritima, vol. XXII (2009) ISSN 0137-3587 KAROL PIASECKI Szczecin THE WHITE SEA POMORYE AND ITS INHABITANTS 1. The White Sea Pomorye owes its name to a group of Slavic settlers1 living mainly on the so-called Pomor Coast, i.e. a fragment of the White Sea coast be- tween the River Kem and Onega (Fig. 1). The present name of the White Sea became widespread at the beginning of the 17th century. Before that, the Slavic inhabitants of its coasts used a name Студеное Море, which means the Cold Sea, whereas on western maps, since the times of the reissue in 1568 of Claudius Ptole- my’s Geography, it appeared as Sinus Grandvicus (Granvicus, Grandvich). The name was taken from Norwegian sailors, for whom initially it probably meant the Western end of the Murmansk Coast.2 1 The term Pomors appeared for the first time in written sources in 1526, when: Поморцы с моря Океана из Кондолакской гyбы лросили вмесmе с лоплянамва yсmройства церкви. It functions quite commonly in the 16th century, both as a name of the inhabitants of the Pomor Coast, as well in the function of a proper name – I. Ul’janov: Strana Pomorja, 1984. From the second half of the 17th century, mainly because of Vasiliy Tatishchev, the author of the monumental Russian History, Pomorye was understood in three meanings: as 1) a territory of the White Sea coast from the Onega to the Kem, 2) the territory of the whole White Sea Coast, 3) the territory of the whole Russian North, including the provinces of Archangelsk, Vologda and Olonets.
  • 1. Geographic Location and Demographic Situation

    1. Geographic Location and Demographic Situation

    1. Geographic location and demographic situation The city of Arkhangelsk where our meeting is taking place is the administrative center of the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The Arkhangelsk Oblast is located in the north-west of Russia (picture 1) and is washed by the water of three Arctic seas: the White Sea, the Barents Sea and the Kara Sea. The White Sea within the territory of the Arkhangelsk Oblast includes the Onega Bay, the Dvina Bay, and the Mezen Bay with the basins of main surface water bodies – the Northern Dvina, the Onega, and the Mezen rivers. Picture 1. Position of the Arkhangelsk Oblast on the map of Russia Favorable location and proximity to the White Sea contributed to establishment of Arkhangelsk – the first in Russia sea harbor and a center for trade with the Western European states. Arkhangelsk is a large historical, industrial, scientific and cultural center in the North-West of Russia. The following industrial sectors are concentrated here: timber, wood chemical, pulp-and-paper, fishing and fish processing, mechanical engineering. The city of Arkhangelsk is located on the banks of the Northern Dvina River and on the islands of its estuary (picture 2). The city is divided into 8 administrative districts. Total area of the city is 294.4 km2, the number of population as for January 1, 2009 is 348.3 thousand people. The construction of Arkhangelsk was mainly based on the location of large industrial and transportation facilities. As a result the city is stretched from the North to the South for more than 30 km, and from the West to the East – for 20 km.
  • Atlas of High Conservation Value Areas, and Analysis of Gaps And

    Atlas of High Conservation Value Areas, and Analysis of Gaps And

    3. ANALYSIS OF DELIMITATION OF HCV AREAS AND ASSESSMENT OF REPRESENTATIVENESS OF PROTECTED AREA NETWORK IN NORTHWEST RUSSIA Elena Esipova, Konstantin Kobyakov, Andrey Korosov, Anton Korosov & Aleksander Markovsky Editor: Konstantin Kobyakov 3.1. Network of existing ered together with the zakazniks to which they protected areas are closest and have similar status and protection regime. A complete list of protected areas in the six regions of this study is presented in the Appendix, 3.1.1. Distribution of protected with total surface areas and year of establishment. areas by category Titles of protected areas on the maps correspond to those in the list of protected areas of Arkhangelsk The network of protected areas in the six admin- Region (A), Vologda Region (B), Leningrad Region istrative regions of northwest Russia(four regions, (C), the City of St. Petersburg (D), the Republic of one republic and City of St. Petersburg) that are Karelia (E), and Murmansk Region (F). included in this study is described in Chapter 1. Below we will discuss the representativeness of the It should be noted that the data on the total area areas of high conservation value (HCV areas) in the of protected areas with respect to the total area of protected area network in each of these regions. the administrative region are approximate, as the exact boundaries for several nature monuments The total number of protected areas (federal and in Arkhangelsk Region, as well as for some pro- regional levels) in the study area is 641: tected areas in Vologda Region and the Republic • 8 strict nature reserves or zapovedniks (five of Karelia, were not determined at the moment of with protected buffer zones) writing for various reasons (see notes in the Ap- • 5 national parks (one with protected buffer zone) pendix).
  • The Beluga Whale (Delphinapterus Leucas) Catches in the White, Barents, and Western Kara Seas from 1930 Based on Original Sources

    The Beluga Whale (Delphinapterus Leucas) Catches in the White, Barents, and Western Kara Seas from 1930 Based on Original Sources

    Russian J. Theriol. 18(1): 20–32 © RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF THERIOLOGY, 2019 The beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) catches in the White, Barents, and western Kara seas from 1930 based on original sources Yaroslava I. Alekseeva, Olga V. Shpak* & Svyatoslav S. Gorbunov ABSTRACT: The work is based on an analysis of archival documents containing quantitative information on harvests of beluga whales in the White, Barents, and western Kara seas from 1930. Also, information is provided on the possible places where the documents containing data of beluga whaling could still be preserved. The probable causes of the reduction in catches and abundance of beluga whales in the coastal waters of the study areas, observed from the late 1960s, are discussed. How to cite this article: Alekseeva Y.I., Shpak O.V., Gorbunov S.S. 2019. The beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) catches in the White, Barents, and western Kara seas from 1930 based on original sources //Russian J. Theriol. Vol.18. No.1. P.20–32. doi: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.18.1.03. KEY WORDS: beluga whale, Delphinapterus leucas, commercial harvest, White Sea, Barents Sea, Kara Sea, archival documents. Yaroslava I. Alekseeva [[email protected]], K.A. Timiryazev State Biological Museum, Malaya Gruzinskaya 15, Moscow 123242, Russia; Olga V. Shpak [[email protected]], A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Leninsky prospect 33, Moscow 119071, Russia; Svyatoslav S. Gorbunov [[email protected]], independent researcher, Moscow, Russia. Документальные данные об уловах белухи (Delphinapterus leucas) в Белом, Баренцевом морях и западной части Карского моря с 1930 г. Я.И. Алексеева, О.В.
  • Electronic Scientific Journal 'Arctic and North'

    Electronic Scientific Journal 'Arctic and North'

    ISSN 2221-2698 Electronic scientific journal ‘Arctic and North’ Arkhangelsk 2013. № 11 Arctic and North. 2013. № 11 2 ISSN 2221-2698 Arctic and North. 2013. № 11 Electronic periodical edition © Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov, 2013 © Editorial Board of the Electronic Journal ‘Arctic and North’, 2013 Published at least 4 times a year Journal is registered: in Roskomnadzor as electronic periodical edition in Russian and English. Evidence of the Federal Ser- vice for Supervision of Communications, information technology and mass communications El. number FS77-42 809 of 26 November 2010; in The ISSN International Centre – in the world catalogue of the serials and prolonged re- sources. ISSN 2221-2698; in the system of the Russian Science Citation Index. License agreement. № 96-04/2011R from the 12 April 2011; in the Depository in the electronic editions FSUE STC ‘Informregistr’ (registration certificate № 543 от 13 October 2011) and it was also given a number of state registrations 0421200166. in the database EBSCO Publishing (Massachysets, USA). Licence agreement from the 19th of December 2012. Founder – Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov. Chef Editor − Lukin Yury Fedorovich, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor. Money is not taken from the authors, graduate students, for publishing articles and other materials, fees are not paid. An editorial office considers it possible to publish the articles, the conceptual and theoretical positions of the authors, which are good for discussion. Published ma- terials may not reflect the opinions of the editorial officer. All manuscripts are reviewed. The Edi- torial Office reserves the right to choose the most interesting and relevant materials, which should be published in the first place.