DOCSLIB.ORG

Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1984 Vol.3 TENTH CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, LONDON, 12-19 SEPTEMBER 1984 Nuclear Fusion, Supplement 1985

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1984 Vol.3 TENTH CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, LONDON, 12-19 SEPTEMBER 1984 Nuclear Fusion, Supplement 1985 Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1984 Vol.3 TENTH CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, LONDON, 12-19 SEPTEMBER 1984 Nuclear Fusion, Supplement 1985 fj&\ VW& INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1985 ^^ m PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED NUCLEAR FUSION RESEARCH 1984 VOLUME 3 The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN HAITI PARAGUAY ALBANIA HOLY SEE PERU ALGERIA HUNGARY PHILIPPINES ARGENTINA ICELAND POLAND AUSTRALIA INDIA PORTUGAL AUSTRIA INDONESIA QATAR BANGLADESH IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF ROMANIA BELGIUM IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA BOLIVIA IRELAND SENEGAL BRAZIL ISRAEL SIERRA LEONE BULGARIA ITALY SINGAPORE BURMA IVORY COAST SOUTH AFRICA BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET JAMAICA SPAIN SOCIALIST REPUBLIC JAPAN SRI LANKA CAMEROON JORDAN SUDAN CANADA KENYA SWEDEN CHILE KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SWITZERLAND CHINA KUWAIT SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COLOMBIA LEBANON THAILAND COSTA RICA LIBERIA TUNISIA CUBA LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA TURKEY CYPRUS LIECHTENSTEIN UGANDA CZECHOSLOVAKIA LUXEMBOURG UKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC KAMPUCHEA MADAGASCAR REPUBLIC DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S MALAYSIA UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF KOREA MALI REPUBLICS DENMARK MAURITIUS UNITED ARAB EMIRATES DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MEXICO UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT ECUADOR MONACO BRITAIN AND NORTHERN EGYPT MONGOLIA IRELAND EL SALVADOR MOROCCO UNITED REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA NAMIBIA TANZANIA FINLAND NETHERLANDS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FRANCE NEW ZEALAND URUGUAY GABON NICARAGUA VENEZUELA GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC NIGER VIET NAM GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA YUGOSLAVIA GHANA NORWAY ZAIRE GREECE PAKISTAN ZAMBIA GUATEMALA PANAMA The Agency's Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957. The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna. Its principal objective is "to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world". © IAEA, 1985 Permission to reproduce or translate the information contained in this publication may be obtained by writing to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramerstrasse 5, P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. Printed by the IAEA in Austria June 1985 NUCLEAR FUSION SUPPLEMENT 1985 PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED NUCLEAR FUSION RESEARCH 1984 PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED NUCLEAR FUSION RESEARCH HELD BY THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY IN LONDON, 12-19 SEPTEMBER 1984 In three volumes VOLUME 3 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 1985 PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED NUCLEAR FUSION RESEARCH 1984 IAEA, VIENNA, 1985 STI/PUB/670 ISBN 92-0-130285-1 FOREWORD The continuing progress of fusion research towards its ultimate goal of commercially viable power was reported at the Tenth IAEA International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research. This progress extends to all approaches to controlled fusion and fusion technology, particularly in the area of tokamak experiments. The first results reported by the two new-generation tokamaks, the Joint European Torus (JET) and the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) in the United States of America exceeded expectations. This series of conferences is organized bienially by the IAEA. The Tenth Conference was held from 12 to 19 September 1984 at the Imperial College of Science and Technology in London. It was organized by the Agency in co-operation with the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority's Culham Laboratory and the JET Joint Undertaking, to whom the Agency wishes to express its gratitude. The conference was attended by 531 participants and 46 observers from 37 countries and 5 international organizations. At the technical sessions, which included 6 poster sessions, 171 papers were presented. Contributions were made on theory, magnetic and inertial confinement systems and related technology. The conference opened with the traditional Artsimovich Memorial Lecture. These Proceedings, which include all the technical papers and five con­ ference summaries, are published in English as a supplement to the IAEA journal, Nuclear Fusion. The Agency promotes close international co-operation among plasma and fusion physicists and engineers of all countries by organizing these regular conferences on controlled nuclear fusion and by holding seminars, workshops and specialists meetings on appropriate topics. It is hoped that the present publication, as part of these activities, will contribute to the rapid demonstration of fusion power as one of the world's future energy resources. EDITORIAL NOTE The papers and discussions have been edited by the editorial staff of the International Atomic Energy Agency to the extent considered necessary for the reader's assistance. The views expressed and the general style adopted remain, however, the responsibility of the named authors or participants. In addition, the views are not necessarily those of the governments of the nominating Member States or of the nominating organizations. Where papers have been incorporated into these Proceedings without resetting by the Agency, this has been done with the knowledge of the authors and their government authorities, and their cooperation is gratefully acknowledged. The Proceedings have been printed by composition typing and photo-offset lithography. Within the limitations imposed by this method, every effort has been made to maintain a high editorial standard, in particular to achieve, wherever practicable, consistency of units and symbols and conformity to the standards recommended by competent international bodies. The use in these Proceedings of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of their products or brand names does not imply any endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining the necessary permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources. CONTENTS OF VOLUME 3 INERTIAL CONFINEMENT (Session B) Cannonball target experiment with the GEKKO laser system at ILE Osaka (IAEA-CN-44/B-I-1) 3 C. Yamanaka, H Azechi, E. Fujiwara, S. Ido, Y. Izawa, T. Jitsuno, Y. Kato, Y. Kîtagawa, K. Mima, N. Miyanaga, T. Mochizuki, S. Nakai, M. Nakatsuka, H. Niki, H. Nishimura, K. Nishihara, T. Norimatsu, T. Sasaki, S. Sakabe, T. Yabe, M. Yamanaka, T. Yamanaka, K. Yoshida Discussion 15 Progress in inertial confinement fusion at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (IAEA-CN-44/B-I-2) 17 J.F. Holzrichter Discussion 24 Constraints and achievements in directly driven laser compression (IAEA-CN-44/B-I-3) 25 R.G. Evans, A.R. Bell, D. Bassett, A.J. Cole, R.W. Eason, C.J. Hooker, M. H. Key, D.J. Nicholas, S.J. Rose, P.T. Rumsby, W.T. Toner, D.J. Bradley, J.D. Hares, J.D. Kilkenny, B.J. MacGowan, A.J. Rankin, D. Tabatabaei, J.D. Wark, V. Aboites, T.A. Hall, E.G. McGoldrick, S.M.L. Sim, P. Fews, D. Henshaw, F. McCavanagh, J. McGlinchey, M.J. Lamb, C.S. Lewis, S. Saadat, A. Hauer, 0. Willi Discussion 35 Short wavelength, direct drive laser fusion experiments at the Laboratory for Laser Energetics (IAEA-CN-44/B-I-4) 37 R.L. McCrory, 0. Barnouin, R.S. Craxton, J. Delettrez, R. Epstein, L. Forsley, L.M. Goldman, R.J. Hutchison, R.L. Keck, H Kim, W. Lampeter, S.A. Letzring, R.S. Marjoribanks, P. McKenty, M. C. Richardson, W. Seka, R. W. Short, A. Simon, S. Skupsky, J.M. Soures, K Swartz, K. Tanaka, C. Verdón, B. Yaakobi Discussion 47 Work on the laser-matter interaction programme at Centre d'études de Limeil-Valenton (IAEA-CN-44/B-I-5) 49 E. Berthier, G. Bosca, E. Buresi, A. Coudeville, J. Coûtant, R. Dautray, M. Decroisette, C Delmare, B. Duborgel, P. Guillaneux, P. Nelson, J.M. Reisse, B. Sitt, J.P. Watteau General Discussion 57 Light-ion fusion research in the USA (IAEA-CN-44/B-II-l) 59 J. P. VanDevender, D.D. Bloomquist, J.T. Crow, D.L. Hanson, T.W. Hussey, D.J. Johnson, R.J. Leeper, J.E. Maenchen, C.W. Mendel Jr., PA. Miller, L.P. Mix, W.B. Moore, EL. Neau, G.D. Peterson, J.P. Quintenz,D.B. Seidel, S.A. Slutz, R.W. Stinnett, MI.A. Stygar, J.A. Swegle, B.N. Turman, G. Yonas, G. Cooperstein, R.A. Meger, J.R. Boiler, D.G. Colombant, R.J. Commisso, S.A. Goldstein, R. Kulsrud, S. McDonald, J.M. Neri, W.F. Oliphant, P.P. Ottinger, T.J. Renk, J.D. Shipman Jr., S.J. Stephanakis, B. V. Weber, F.C. Young, M.P. Desjarlais, J.B. Greenly, D.A. Hammer, R. Krat, B.R. Kusse, Y. Marón, R.E. Mattis, H.S. Peng, G.D. Rondeau, R.N. Sudan Discussion 69 Light-ion fusion research in Japan (IAEA-CN-44/B-H-2) 71 K. Imasaki, S. Miyamoto, T. Ozaki, H. Fujita, N. Yugami, S. Higaki, S. Nakai, K. Nishihara, C. Yamanaka, K. Yatsui, Y. Araki, K. Masugata, M. ho, M. Matsui, K. Kasuya, K. Horioka, T. Takahashi, H. Tamura, M. Hifikawa, H. Yoneda Heavy-ion fusion accelerator research in the USA (IAEA-CN-44/B-II-3) 81 R.O. Banger ter, T.D. Godlove, W.B. Herrmannsfeldt, D. Keefe Discussion 89 Preheating suppression for high-density compression by C02 laser (IAEA-CN-44/B-II-4) 91 S. Nakai, H. Daido, H. Fujita, M. Inoue, K. Mima, H. Nishimura, T. Sasaki, K. Sawai, K. Terai, T. Yabe, C. Yamanaka Discussion 99 Theoretical study of low-entropy compression of laser targets (IAEA-CN-44/B-II-5) 101 N.G. Basov, G.A. Vergunova, P.P. Volosevich, S.Yu. Gus'kov, N.N. Demchenko, G. V. Danilova, V. V. Zverev, N. V. Zmitrenko, V. Ya. Karpov, S.P. Kurdyumov, I.G. Lebo, T. V. Mishchenko, V.B. Rozanov, A.A. Samarskij, S.A. Shumskij Development of 2-D implosion codes, and ignition and transport of fusion products in an engineering test reactor (IAEA-CN-44/B-III-l) 113 K.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Perspective on the United States Fusion Program
    Historical Perspective on the United States Fusion Program Invited paper presented at American Nuclear Society 16th Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy 14-16 September, 2004 in Madison, WI Stephen O. Dean Fusion Power Associates, 2 Professional Drive, Suite 249, Gaithersburg, MD 20879 [email protected] A variety of methods to heat the nuclei to the Progress and Policy is traced over the approximately high speeds (kinetic energies) required to penetrate the 55 year history of the U. S. Fusion Program. The Coulomb barrier have been successfully utilized, classified beginnings of the effort in the 1950s ended with including running a high current through an ionized declassification in 1958. The effort struggled during the hydrogen gas ("ohmic heating"), accelerating beams of 1960s, but ended on a positive note with the emergence of nuclei, and using radio-frequency power. Temperatures the tokamak and the promise of laser fusion. The decade well in excess of the 50 million degrees needed for fusion of the 1970s was the “Golden Age” of fusion, with large are now routinely achieved. budget increases and the construction of many new facilities, including the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor II. THE 1960s AND 1970s (TFTR) and the Shiva laser. The decade ended on a high note with the passage of the Magnetic Fusion Energy During the decade of the 1960s, and continuing Engineering Act of 1980, overwhelming approved by to the present, scientists developed a whole new branch of Congress and signed by President Carter. The Act called physics, called plasma physics [3], to describe the for a “$20 billion, 20-year” effort aimed at construction behavior of these plasmas in various magnetic of a fusion Demonstration Power Plant around the end of configurations, and sophisticated theories, models and the century.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Laser Technology
    Nova Laser Technology In building the Nova laser, we have significantly advanced many technologies, including the generation and propagation of laser beams. We have also developed innovations in the fields of alignment, diagnostics, computer control, and image processIng.• For further information contact Nova is the world's most powerful at least 10 to 30 times more energetic John F. Holzrichter (415) 423-7454. laser system. It is designed to heat and than Shiva would be needed to compress small targets, typically 0.1 cm investigate ignition conditions and in size, to conditions otherwise produced possibly to reach gains near unity. only in nuclear weapons or in the Because of the importance of such a interior of stars. Its beams can facility to the progress of inertial fusion concentrate 80 to 120 kJ of energy (in research and because of the construction 3 ns) or 80 to 120 TW of power (in time entailed (at least five to seven 100 ps) on such targets. To couple energy years), the Nova project was proposed to more favorably with the target, Nova's the Energy Research and Development laser light will be harmonically converted Administration and to Congress. It was with greater than 50% efficiency from its decided to base this system on the near-infrared fundamental wavelength proven master-oscillator, linear-amplifier­ (1.05-,um wavelength) to green (0.525- chain laser system used on the Argus ,um) or blue (0.35-,um) wavelengths. The and Shiva systems. We had great goals of our experiments with Nova are confidence in extending this to make accurate measurements of high­ neodymium-glass laser technology to the temperature and high-pressure states of 200- to 300-kJ level.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGINEERING DESIGN of the NOVA LASER FACILITY for By
    ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE NOVA LASER FACILITY FOR INERTIAL-CONFINEMENT FUSION* by W. W. Simmons, R. 0. Godwin, C. A. Hurley, E. P. Wallerstein, K. Whitham, J. E. Murray, E. S. Bliss, R. G. Ozarski. M. A. Summers, F. Rienecker, D. G. Gritton, F. W. Holloway, G. J. Suski, J. R. Severyn, and the Nova Engineering Team. Abstract The design of the Nova Laser Facility for inertia! confinement fusion experiments at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is presented from an engineering perspective. Emphasis is placed upon design-to- performance requirements as they impact the various subsystems that comprise this complex experimental facility. - DISCLAIMER - CO;.T-CI104n--17D DEf;2 013.375 *Research performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract number W-7405-ENG-48. Foreword The Nova Laser System for Inertial Confinement Fusion studies at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories represents a sophisticated engineering challenge to the national scientific and industrial community, embodying many disciplines - optical, mechanical, power and controls engineering for examples - employing state-of-the-art components and techniques. The papers collected here form a systematic, comprehensive presentation of the system engineering involved in the design, construction and operation of the Nova Facility, presently under construction at LLNL and scheduled for first operations in 1985. The 1st and 2nd Chapters present laser design and performance, as well as an introductory overview of the entire system; Chapters 3, 4 and 5 describe the major engineering subsystems; Chapters 6, 7, 8 and 9 document laser and target systems technology, including optical harmonic frequency conversion, its ramifications, and its impact upon other subsystems; and Chapters 10, 11, and 12 present an extensive discussion of our integrated approach to command, control and communications for the entire system.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook
    Nuclear Weapons Databook Volume I11 U.S. Nuclear Warhead Facility Profiles Nuclear Weapons Databook Volume I11 U.S. Nuclear Warhead Facility Profiles Thomas B. Cochran, William M. Arkin, Robert S. Morris, and Milton M. Hoenig A book by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. BALUNGER PUBLISHING COMPANY Cambridge, Massachusetts A Subsidiary of Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. Copyright a 1987 by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans- mitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the publisher. International Standard Book Number: 0-88730-126-6 (CL) 0-88730-146-0 (PB) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 82-24376 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress CataloGng-iii-PublicationData U.S. nuclear warhead facility profiles. (Nuclear weapons databook ;v. 3) "A book by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc." Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Nuclear weapons-United States. 2. Munitions-United States. I. Cochran, Thomas B. 11. Natural Resources Defense Council. 111. Title: US nuclear warhead facility profiles. IV. Title: United States nuclear warhead facility profiles. V. Series: Cochran, Thomas B. Nuclear weapons databook ;v. 3. U264.C6 1984 vol. 3 355.8'25119'0973 87-14552 [U264] ISBN 0-88410-172-X (v. 1) ISBN 0-88410-173-8 (pbk. : v. 1) ISBN 0-88730-124-X (v. 2) ISBN 0-88730-125-8 (pbk. : v. 2) ISBN 0-88730-126-6 (v. 3) ISBN 0-88730-146-0 (pbk.
    [Show full text]
  • Lasers Join the Quest for Fusion Energy
    1974 Lasers and ICF Lasers Join the Quest to gain a better understanding of laser plasma physics and thermonuclear physics and to demonstrate for Fusion Energy laser-induced compression and thermonuclear burn of deuterium–tritium. It was also used to improve the LASNEX computer code developed for laser With the goal of achieving energy gain fusion predictions. Janus was just the In 1975, the one-beam Cyclops laser through inertial confinement fusion beginning of the development, in quick began operation, performing important (ICF) as its mission, the Laser Program succession, of a series of lasers, each target experiments and testing optical constructed its first laser for ICF building on the knowledge gained from designs for future lasers. The next year, experiments in 1974. Named Janus, the last, leading to the National Ignition the two-beam Argus was built. Use of the two-beam laser was built with about Facility (NIF), currently performing Argus increased knowledge about laser– 100 pounds of laser glass. experiments. The pace of laser target interactions and laser propagation The first Livermore laser for construction matched the growth limits, and it helped the ICF program prepared the Laboratory to take the With the 20-beam ICF research, Janus, had Under the leadership of John Emmett, in ICF diagnostics capabilities, develop technologies needed for the next major step, construction of the Shiva laser in 1977, the two beams and produced who headed the Laser Program from computer simulation tools, and next generation of laser fusion systems. 192-beam NIF (see Year 1997), where Laboratory established 10 joules of energy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Surface Processing Methods on the Laser Induced Damage Threshold of Fused Silica
    The Effect of Surface Processing Methods on the Laser Induced Damage Threshold of Fused Silica by Weiran Duan A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of PhD at the University of Central Lancashire October 2014 2 To my family i Declaration I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution. I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work. Weiran Duan ii Abstract High peak power laser systems, such as National Ignition Facility (NIF), Laser Mega Joule (LMJ), and High Power laser Energy Research facility (HiPER), include a large amount of optics. Fused silica glass is one of the most common optical materials which is used in these high peak power laser systems owing to its excellent optical properties, especially for the 355nm ultraviolet laser. However, it is generally found that fused silica optics damage under irradiation with a high peak power laser beam, and the laser induced damage (LID) becomes the limit to increasing the laser power. Theoretically, the laser induced damage threshold (LIDT) of fused silica substrates is high, while it drops significantly due to the poor surface quality created in the manufacturing process. This project aims to find a series of fused silica optical surface processing techniques which are able to improve the surface quality and increase its LIDT when irradiated using high peak power lasers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nd Lu Caf2 for High-Energy Lasers Simone Normani
    Nd Lu CaF2 for high-energy lasers Simone Normani To cite this version: Simone Normani. Nd Lu CaF2 for high-energy lasers. Physics [physics]. Normandie Université, 2017. English. NNT : 2017NORMC230. tel-01689866 HAL Id: tel-01689866 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01689866 Submitted on 22 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THESE Pour obtenir le diplôme de doctorat Physique Préparée au sein de l’Université de Caen Normandie Nd:Lu:CaF2 for High-Energy Lasers Étude de Cristaux de CaF2:Nd:Lu pour Lasers de Haute Énergie Présentée et soutenue par Simone NORMANI Thèse soutenue publiquement le 19 octobre 2017 devant le jury composé de M. Patrice CAMY Professeur, Université de Caen Normandie Directeur de thèse M. Alain BRAUD MCF HDR, Université de Caen Normandie Codirecteur de thèse M. Jean-Luc ADAM Directeur de Recherche, CNRS Rapporteur Mme. Patricia SEGONDS Professeur, Université de Grenoble Rapporteur M. Jean-Paul GOOSSENS Ingénieur, CEA Examinateur M. Maurizio FERRARI Directeur de Recherche, CNR-IFN Examinateur Thèse dirigée par Patrice CAMY et Alain BRAUD, laboratoire CIMAP Université de Caen Normandie Nd:Lu:CaF2 for High-Energy Lasers Thesis for the Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • X-Ray Lasing: the Novette Laser
    X-Ray Lasing: The Novelle Laser Although the Novette laser system served primarily as a test bed for advanced concepts of targets and lasers for the Nova system, its flexibility enabled us to use it for research that led to the world's first demonstration of x-ray lasing. ver the past decade, we have harmonic conversion for producing For further information contact built a series of ever more light of higher frequencies (that is, Kenneth R. Manes (415) 423-6207. O powerful and complex laser shorter wavelengths). With Novette, systems Ganus, Argus, Shiva, and now we demonstrated a system for Nova) devoted to research on inertial routinely generating powerful beams confinement fusion (ICF) and weapon of green (0.53-pm) and ultraviolet physics. However, the Novette laser (0.35- and 0.26-pm) light, greatly Fig. 1 system (Fig. 1) did not fit neatly into broadening the range of feasible Artist's rendering of the business end of this series. Although it shared physics experiments. We confirmed the Novette laser system, showing the target characteristics of the other lasers, such that laser-plasma coupling, and chamber, the harmonic-conversion arrays, and the extensive diagnostic instrumentation. as master-oscillator power-amplifier therefore the performance of the rCF The laser amplifier chains are out of the (MOPA) architecture, neodymium­ capsules, is greatly enhanced if green picture, folded trombone style to fit into the glass amplifiers, and a 1.053-pm or ultraviolet light is used instead of available space. fundamental wavelength, in many ways Novette was considerably less complex than its predecessor, the Shiva laser.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Confinement Fusion
    Magnetic confinement fusion - Wikipedia 1 of 7 Magnetic confinement fusion Magnetic confinement fusion is an approach to generate thermonuclear fusion power that uses magnetic fields to confine fusion fuel in the form of a plasma. Magnetic confinement is one of two major branches of fusion energy research, along with inertial confinement fusion. The magnetic approach began in the 1940s and absorbed the majority of subsequent development. Fusion reactions combine light atomic nuclei such as hydrogen to form heavier ones such as helium, producing energy. In order to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between the nuclei, they must have a temperature of tens of millions of degrees, The reaction chamber of the TCV, an creating a plasma. In addition, the plasma experimental tokamak fusion reactor at École must be contained at a sufficient density for polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland which has been used in research a sufficient time, as specified by the Lawson since it was built in 1992. The characteristic torus- criterion (triple product). shaped chamber is clad with graphite to help withstand the extreme heat (the shape is distorted Magnetic confinement fusion attempts to by the camera's fisheye lens). use the electrical conductivity of the plasma to contain it through interaction with magnetic fields. The magnetic pressure offsets the plasma pressure. Developing a suitable arrangement of fields that contain the fuel without excessive turbulence or leaking is the primary challenge of this technology. Contents History Plasma Types Magnetic mirrors Toroidal machines Z-pinch Stellarators https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_confinement_fusion Magnetic confinement fusion - Wikipedia 2 of 7 Tokamaks Compact toroids Other Magnetic fusion energy See also References External links History The development of magnetic fusion energy (MFE) came in three distinct phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Axisymmetric Tandem Mirror D-T Neutron Source
    Axisymmetric Tandem Mirror D-T Neutron Source W. Horton∗ and J. Pratt University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Fusion Studies A.W. Molvik Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory R.M. Kulsrud, N.J. Fisch Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory I. OVERVIEW We propose to harness an axisymmetric tandem mirror machine to create an intense neutron source[1] [2]. Our machine would be initially based on the successful GAMMA-10 tandem mirror experiment in Tsukuba, Japan and the Gas Dynamic Trap (GDT) mirror experiment in Novosibirsk, Russia. In addition it would be suitable for testing of several other axisymmetric stabilization methods: kinetic stabilizers [3] [4], sloshing ions, and wall stabilization, which would enable higher-Q operation than with GDT-type stabilization. The GAMMA-10 has achieved record breaking confinement results that extrapolate to the production of fusion power in a range of fusion Q from 0.1 to 5 in the near future [5]. In this work the authors outline a linear system that could produce large neutron fluxes in a spectrum nearly identical to that of the ITER device currently being built[6]. A hydrogen prototype of a D-T mirror neutron source would allow experiments on stabilization in axisymmetric cells and expanders that would lead to an optimized fusion Q design. Optimizations are needed for fusion-fission hybrid designs versus pure fusion designs. II. ADVANTAGES OF TANDEM MIRRORS The linear axisymmetric system has major conceptual advantages over all toroidal systems. We list a few of these advantages here: (1) Simplicity of engineering with no interlinked magnetic-field coils and no volt-second transformer considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Diagnostics for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Plasmas
    PSFC/JA-20-4 Nuclear diagnostics for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) plasmas J. A. Frenje January 2020 Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA The work described herein was supported in part by US DOE (Grant No. DE-FG03-03SF22691), LLE (subcontract Grant No. 412160-001G) and the Center for Advanced Nuclear Diagnostics (Grant No. DE-NA0003868). Reproduction, translation, publication, use and disposal, in whole or in part, by or for the United States government is permitted. Submitted to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Nuclear Diagnostics for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Plasmas J.A. Frenje1 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Email: [email protected] The field of nuclear diagnostics for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) is broadly reviewed from its beginning in the seventies to present day. During this time, the sophistication of the ICF facilities and the suite of nuclear diagnostics have substantially evolved, generally a consequence of the efforts and experience gained on previous facilities. As the fusion yields have increased several orders of magnitude during these years, the quality of the nuclear-fusion-product measurements has improved significantly, facilitating an increased level of understanding about the physics governing the nuclear phase of an ICF implosion. The field of ICF has now entered an era where the fusion yields are high enough for nuclear measurements to provide spatial, temporal and spectral information, which have proven indispensable to understanding the performance of an ICF implosion. At the same time, the requirements on the nuclear diagnostics have also become more stringent.
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS of FUSION RESEARCH and IMPLICATIONS for D-3He SYSTEMS
    STATUS OF FUSION RESEARCH AND IMPLICATIONS FOR D-3He SYSTEMS George H. Miley Fusion Studies Laboratory University of Illinois 103 South Goodwin Avenue Urbana, IL 61801 World-wide programs in both magnetic confinement and inertial confinement fusion research have made steady progress towards the experimental demonstration of energy breakeven.(*-') Both approaches are now in reach of this goal within the next few years using a D-T equivalent plasma. For magnetic confinement, this step is expected in one of the large tokamak experimental devices such as TFTR (USA), JET (EC), JT-60 (Japan), or T-15 (USSR). Upgraded versions of the Nova glass laser (USA) and CEKKO (Japan) also appear to have a good chance at this goal. The light-ion beam facility "PBFA-11" is viewed as a "dark horse" candidate. Recent physics parameters obtained in these various experiments will be briefly reviewed in this presentation. However, after breakeven is achieved, considerable time and effort must still be expended to develop a usable power plant. The time schedules envisioned by workers in the various countries involved are fairly similar.(l-J) For example, the European Community (EC) proposes to go from the physics studies in JET to an engineering test reactor (NET) which has a construction decision in 1991. This is projected to result in a demonstration reactor after 2015. Plans for inertial confinement are-currently centered on the development of a "next-step'' target facility based on an advanced 5-megajoule laser on roughly the same time scale as NET.(5) The facilities required for both magnetic and inertial confinement will be large and expensive.
    [Show full text]