DOCSLIB.ORG

The Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands Dispute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands Dispute The Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands Dispute Questions of Sovereignty and Suggestions for Resolving the Dispute By Martin Lohmeyer A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Master of Laws in the Faculty of Law, University of Canterbury 2008 Content Content ....................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements..................................................................................................9 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................11 1.1. Emergence of the name of the islands ................................................................15 1.2. Location, topography, geological features and vegetation ...............................17 1.3. Legal question arising from this dispute............................................................21 1.3.1. Domestic Maritime legislation.................................................................................... 22 1.3.2. Legal Effect on national legislation of the Parties of dispute...................................... 22 2. Political Implications of the Conflict ...............................................................24 2.1. Diaoyu / Senkaku relation to oil..........................................................................24 2.2. Diaoyu Islands as a symbol for Sino-Japanese relations ..................................27 2.2.1. Diaoyu / Senkaku island as a proxy conflict ............................................................... 27 2.2.2. Historical rise of nationalism in the countries............................................................. 28 2.2.3. Chinese Nationalism ................................................................................................... 29 2.2.4. Japan’s Nationalism .................................................................................................... 34 2.2.5. Taiwanese Nationalism............................................................................................... 35 2.3. Impact on disputes over other islands................................................................37 2.3.1. Okinotorishima............................................................................................................ 37 2.3.2. Kurile Islands Dispute................................................................................................. 39 2.3.3. Takeshima / Dokdo / Liancourt Rocks Islands ........................................................... 40 2.3.4. Torishima / Danjo Gunto ............................................................................................ 41 2.3.5. Spratly– Paracel- Pratas- Macclesfield Islands / Reefs ............................................... 41 2.4. Mutual Economic Dependence............................................................................42 2.4.1. Taiwan – Chinese / mainland trade relation................................................................ 42 2.4.2. Japan – China / Mainland trade relation...................................................................... 43 2.4.3. Taiwanese / Japanese Trade relation........................................................................... 44 2.5. U.S. interests in the dispute .................................................................................44 3. History of the Conflict from 1372 to today.......................................................46 3.1. Missions of the Ming Dynasty to the Ryukyu....................................................46 Kingdom.......................................................................................................................46 3.1.1. Chen Kan Mission in 1532.......................................................................................... 47 3.1.2. Kuo Ju Lin Mission in 1561........................................................................................ 48 3.1.3. Xiao Chong Mission in 1576 ...................................................................................... 49 3.1.4. Xia Ziyang Mission in 1606........................................................................................ 50 3.1.5. Shunfeng Xiangsong Logbook of 1403 ...................................................................... 51 3.1.6. Defence Manuals......................................................................................................... 51 3.1.6.1. Zheng Ruozheng manual of 1561 ............................................................................ 51 3.1.6.2. Military relation between China and the Ryukyu .................................................... 52 3.2. Missions to the Ryukyu Kingdom in Qing Dynasty ..........................................52 3.2.1. Records of Zhang Xueli mission in 1663.................................................................... 52 3.2.2. Records of Wang Chi in 1683..................................................................................... 53 3.2.3. Xu Baoguang Mission in 1709.................................................................................... 54 3.2.4. Zhou Huang Mission in 1755...................................................................................... 56 3.2.5. Geographer’s point of view......................................................................................... 56 3.2.5.1. Hayashi Shifei.......................................................................................................... 56 3.2.5.2. Cheng Shuntse in 1708............................................................................................. 56 3.2.5.3. Lin Tzu-ping in 1785 ............................................................................................... 57 3.2.6. Location for gathering herbs and fishing .................................................................... 57 3.3. Japan’s discovery of the Diaoyu Islands ............................................................57 3.3.1. Japan’s Invasion to the Ryukyu Kingdom .................................................................. 57 3.3.2. China’s - Japanese Mediation as a suite to Japan’s Invasion ...................................... 58 3.3.3. Japan’s Discovery of the Islands in 1884.................................................................... 58 3.3.4. Japan’s acquisition of the Senkaku Islands ................................................................. 59 3.3.4.1. Background of Japan’s tardiness.............................................................................. 59 3.3.4.2. First Letter of Okinawa Prefecture Magistrate in 1885............................................ 60 3.3.4.3. Letter of the Foreign Secretary in 1885 ................................................................... 61 3.3.4.4. Second Okinawa Magistrate’s letter in 1885 ........................................................... 62 3.3.4.5. Response of the Home Secretary ............................................................................. 62 3.3.4.6. Further letters of request of Okinawa’s Magistrate.................................................. 63 3.3.4.7. Decree of Empress Dowager Cixi of 1893............................................................... 63 3.3.4.8. Information of Okinawa Prefecture in 1894............................................................. 64 3.3.4.9. Sino - Japanese War 1894 / 1895............................................................................. 65 3.3.4.10. Cabinet Decision on January 14th, 1895................................................................. 65 3.3.4.11. Treaty of Shimonoseki of April 17th, 1895............................................................. 67 3.3.4.12. Imperial Decree No. 13 on March 5th, 1896........................................................... 67 3.3.4.13. Taiwanese Consul General in Nagasaki 1920........................................................ 69 3.3.4.14. Koga ran Japanese business on the island until 1920s ........................................... 70 3.3.4.15. Tokyo Court Ruling 1941-44................................................................................. 70 3.4. The Islands status in the post-war era................................................................71 3.4.1. Cairo Declaration 1943 ............................................................................................... 71 3.4.2. Yalta Conference 1945................................................................................................ 72 3.4.3. Potsdam Declaration in 1945 ...................................................................................... 72 3.4.4. Japanese Surrender August 15th, 1945 ........................................................................ 73 3.4.5. Decree 667 of the U.N. ............................................................................................... 73 3.4.6. American occupation .................................................................................................. 73 3.4.6.1. American Maps........................................................................................................ 73 3.4.6.2. Ordinance No. 22 in 1950 ........................................................................................ 74 3.4.7. Background of the two separate treaties ..................................................................... 74 3.4.7.1. San Francisco Treaty in 1951..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Writing Taiwan History: Interpreting the Past in the Global Present
    EATS III Paris, 2006 Writing Taiwan History: Interpreting the Past in the Global Present Ann Heylen Research Unit on Taiwanese Culture and Literature, Ruhr University Bochum [email protected] Do not cite, work in progress Introduction Concurrent with nation building is the construction of a national history to assure national cohesion. Hence, the collective memory is elevated to the standard of national myth and most often expressed in the master narrative. I may refer here to Michael Robinson’s observation that “the state constructs and maintains a ‘master narrative’ of nation which acts as an official ‘story of the nation’. This master narrative legitimates the existence of the state and nation internally; it is also projected externally, to legitimate a nations’ existence in the world community”.1 But in as much as memory is selective, so also is the state-sanctioned official narrative, and it has become commonplace that changes in the political order enhance and result in ideologically motivated re-writing of that history in spite of its claims at objectivity and truth. The study of the contemporary formation of Taiwan history and its historiography is no exception. In fact, the current activity in rewriting the history is compounded by an additional element, and one which is crucial to understanding the complexity of the issue. What makes Taiwanese historiography as a separate entity interesting, intriguing and complex is that the master-narrative is treated as a part of and embedded in Chinese history, and at the same time conditioned by the transition from a perceived to a real pressure from a larger nation, China, that lays claim on its territory, ethnicity, and past.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan, Russia and the "Northern Territories" Dispute : Neighbors in Search of a Good Fence
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2002-09 Japan, Russia and the "northern territories" dispute : neighbors in search of a good fence Morris, Gregory L. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/4801 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS JAPAN, RUSSIA AND THE “NORTHERN TERRITORIES” DISPUTE: NEIGHBORS IN SEARCH OF A GOOD FENCE by Gregory L. Morris September, 2002 Thesis Advisors: Mikhail Tsypkin Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2002 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Japan, Russia And The “Northern Territories” Dispute: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Neighbors In Search Of A Good Fence n/a 6. AUTHOR(S) LT Gregory L.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty of San Francisco - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 Sur 5
    Treaty of San Francisco - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 sur 5 Treaty of San Francisco From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Treaty of San Francisco The Treaty of San Francisco or San Francisco Peace (San Francisco Peace Treaty) Treaty between the Allied Powers and Japan, was Treaty of Peace with Japan officially signed by 49 nations on September 8, 1951 in San Francisco, California. It came into force on April 28, English Treaty of Peace with Japan 1952. It is a popularly known name, but its formal French Traité de paix avec le Japon English name is Treaty of Peace with Japan. Spanish Tratado de Paz con Japón This treaty served officially to end World War II, to end Japanese 日本国との 平和条約 formally Japan's position as an imperial power and to ( Nihon-koku tono Heiwa- allocate compensation to Allied civilians and former Jōyaku? ) prisoners of war who had suffered Japanese war crimes. This treaty made extensive use of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to enunciate the Allies' goals. This treaty, along with the Security Treaty signed that same year, is said to mark the beginning of the "San Francisco System", this term, coined by historian John Dower, signifies the effects of Japan's relationship with the United States and its role in the international arena as determined by these two treaties and is used to discuss the ways in which these effects have governed Japan's post-war history. Contents n 1 Attending countries n 1.1 Signatories and ratification n 2 The fate of Japanese overseas territories n 3 Compensation
    [Show full text]
  • How China Started the Second Sino-Japanese War: Why Should Japan Apologize to China?
    How China Started the Second Sino-Japanese War: Why Should Japan Apologize to China? By Moteki Hiromichi Society for the Dissemination of Historical Facts © 1 Introduction In the so-called "apology issue," which concerns Japan's conduct in China during the Second Sino-Japanese War, there exists two opposing points of view: "I guess the only thing we can do is to keep on apologizing until China tells us, 'The problems between us may not be settled, but for now you have sufficiently apologized.'" -Murakami Haruki1 "A grateful China should also pay respect to Yasukuni Shrine." -Ko Bunyu2 Mr. Murakami's opinion is based on the belief that Japan waged an aggressive war against China, a belief shared by many Japanese even if they don't know the reason why. This belief holds that the Japanese should be completely repentant over that act of aggression for the sake of clearing our own conscience. There are two major problems with this point of view. First of all, it rests on the conventional wisdom that Japan was guilty of aggression towards China. Many people will perhaps respond to that by saying something like, "What are you talking about? The Japanese Army invaded continental China and waged war there. Surely that constitutes a war of aggression." However, let's imagine the following scenario. What if the Japan Self-Defense Forces launched an unprovoked attack on American military units, which are stationed in Japan in accordance with the provisions of the US-Japan Security Treaty, and a war broke out on Japanese territory? Because the fighting would be taking place in Japan, does that mean that, in this scenario, the US Army is undeniably the aggressor? No matter how distasteful a person might find the US military presence to be, under international law, Japan would be deemed the aggressor here.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Francisco System: Past, Present, Future in U.S.- Japan-China Relations サンフランシスコ体制 米日中関係の過去、 現在、そして未来
    Volume 12 | Issue 8 | Number 2 | Article ID 4079 | Feb 23, 2014 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The San Francisco System: Past, Present, Future in U.S.- Japan-China Relations サンフランシスコ体制 米日中関係の過去、 現在、そして未来 John W. Dower controversies and tensions involving Japan, China, and the United States. NOTE: This essay, written in January 2013, appears as the first section in a book co- Take, for example, a single day in China: authored by John W. Dower and GavanSeptember 18, 2012. Demonstrators in scores McCormack and published in Japaneseof Chinese cities were protesting Japan's claims translation by NHK Shuppan Shinsho in to the tiny, uninhabited islands in the East January 2014 under the title Tenkanki no Nihon China Sea known as Senkaku in Japanese and e: "Pakkusu Amerikana" ka-"Pakkusu Ajia" ka Diaoyu in Chinese-desecrating the Hi no Maru ("Japan at a Turning Point-Pax Americana? Pax flag and forcing many China-based Japanese Asia?"; the second section is an essay by factories and businesses to temporarily shut McCormack on Japan's client-state relationship down. with the United States focusing on the East China Sea "periphery," and the book concludes Simultaneously, Chinese leaders were accusing with an exchange of views on current tensions the United States and Japan of jointly pursuing in East Asia as seen in historical perspective). a new "containment of China" policy- An abbreviated version of the Dower essay also manifested, most recently, in the decision to will be included in a forthcoming volume on the build a new level of ballistic-missile defenses in San Francisco System and its legacies edited Japan as part of the Obama administration's by Kimie Hara and published by Routledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan in the Twentieth Century: an Introduction Richard Louis
    Taiwan in the Twentieth Century: An Introduction Richard Louis Edmonds and Steven M. Goldstein For much of the past half-century, Taiwan’s development has been inextricably tied to the drama of the Chinese civil war and the Cold War in Asia. Both the government on Taiwan and many of its supporters abroad have sought to link the island’s history with that of the mainland. The result has been partially to obscure the distinctive history of Taiwan and, with this, to ignore factors which have decisively shaped the development of the island. The bulk of the papers in this volume seek to contribute to the ongoing efforts of scholars in Taiwan and abroad to illuminate the early 20th-century portion of this history and to join it to discussions of the post-war evolution of the island. With the end of the Second World War, Taiwan was returned to China after 50 years as a Japanese colony. The Kuomintang-controlled Republic of China on the mainland took over the administration of Taiwan almost immediately, subjecting its citizens to a brutal, authoritarian rule. In 1949, after defeat on the mainland, Chiang Kai-shek brought the remnants of that government to Taiwan, where, claiming to be the legitimate govern- ment of all of China, he established a temporary national capital in the one province completely under its control. It seemed at the time that this hollow claim would be silenced by an imminent Communist invasion. The outbreak of the Korean War, how- ever, and fears of Chinese Communist expansion brought renewed econ- omic, military and diplomatic support from the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Comparison • 1587. Two Young Japanese Men Named
    Country comparison Japan United Kingdom Population 127,769,994 (2005 census) 60,975,400 (2007 estimates) Area 377,873 km (145,883 sq mi) 244,820 km (94,526 sq mi) Population 338/km (875.8/sq mi) 249/km (645/sq mi) density Capital Tokyo London Largest city Tokyo – 8,652,700 (12,790,000 Metro) London – 7,556,900 (13,063,441 Metro) Parliamentary system and Parliamentary system and Government Constitutional monarchy C Constitutional monarchy Official Japanese English (other languages recognised) languages Head of state Emperor Akihito Queen Elizabeth II Head of Prime Minister Naoto Kan Prime Minister David Cameron government GDP $4.886 trillion ($38,341 Per Capita) $2.772 trillion ($45,845 Per Capita) (nominal) Chronology of Anglo-Japanese relations 1587. Two young Japanese men named Christopher and Cosmas sailed on a Spanish galleon to California, where their ship was seized by Thomas Cavendish. Cavendish brought the two Japanese men with him to England where they spent approximately three years before going again with him on his last expedition to the South Atlantic. They are the first known Japanese men to have set foot in England. William Adams (1564–1620). 1600. William Adams, a seaman from Gillingham, Kent, was the first Englishman to arrive in Japan. Acting as an advisor to the Tokugawa Shogun, he was renamed Miura Anjin, granted a house and land, and spent the rest of his life in his adopted country. 1605. John Davis, the famous English explorer, was killed by Japanese pirates off the coast of Thailand, thus becoming the first Englishman to be killed by a Japanese.[1] 1623.
    [Show full text]
  • The East China Sea Disputes: History, Status, and Ways Forward
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Almae Matris Studiorum Campus Asian Perspective 38 (2014), 183 –218 The East China Sea Disputes: History, Status, and Ways Forward Mark J. Valencia The dispute over ownership of islands, maritime boundaries, juris - diction, perhaps as much as 100 billion barrels of oil equivalent, and other nonliving and living marine resources in the East China Sea continues to bedevil China-Japan relations. Historical and cultural factors, such as the legacy of World War II and burgeoning nation - alism, are significant factors in the dispute. Indeed, the dispute seems to have become a contest between national identities. The approach to the issue has been a political dance by the two coun - tries: one step forward, two steps back. In this article I explain the East China Sea dispute, explore its effect on China-Japan relations, and suggest ways forward. KEYWORDS : China-Japan relations, terri - torial disputes, nationalism. RELATIONS BETWEEN THE PEOPLE ’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (PRC) AND Japan are perhaps at their lowest ebb since relations were for - mally reestablished in 1972. The d ispute over islets and maritime claims in the East China Sea has triggered m uch of this recent deterioration . Because of the dispute, China has canceled or refused many exchanges and meetings of high-level officials, including summit meetings. In fact, China has said that a summit meeting cannot take place until or unless Japan acknowledges that a dispute over sovereignty and jurisdiction exists, something Japan has thus far refused to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Sino-US Relations and Ulysses S. Grant's Mediation
    Looking for a Friend: Sino-U.S. Relations and Ulysses S. Grant’s Mediation in the Ryukyu/Liuqiu 琉球 Dispute of 1879 Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Chad Michael Berry Graduate Program in East Asian Studies The Ohio State University 2014 Thesis Committee: Christopher A. Reed, Advisor Robert J. McMahon Ying Zhang Copyright by Chad Michael Berry 2014 Abstract In March 1879, Japan announced the end of the Ryukyu (Liuqiu) Kingdom and the establishment of Okinawa Prefecture in its place. For the previous 250 years, Ryukyu had been a quasi-independent tribute-sending state to Japan and China. Following the arrival of Western imperialism to East Asia in the 19th century, Japan reacted to the changing international situation by adopting Western legal standards and clarifying its borders in frontier areas such as the Ryukyu Islands. China protested Japanese actions in Ryukyu, though Qing Dynasty (1644-1912) leaders were not willing to go to war over the islands. Instead, Qing leaders such as Li Hongzhang (1823-1901) and Prince Gong (1833-1898) sought to resolve the dispute through diplomatic means, including appeals to international law, rousing global public opinion against Japan, and, most significantly, requesting the mediation of the United States and former U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant (1822-1885). Initially, China hoped Grant’s mediation would lead to a restoration of the previous arrangement of Ryukyu being a dually subordinate kingdom to China and Japan. In later negotiations, China sought a three-way division of the islands among China, Japan, and Ryukyu.
    [Show full text]
  • No. Area Post Office Name Zip Code Telephone No. Address Same Day
    Zip Same Day Flight No. Area Post Office Name Telephone No. Address Code Cutoff Time* 1 Yilan Yilan Jhongshan Rd. Post Office 26044 (03)9324-133 (03)9326-727 No. 130, Sec. 3, Jhongshan Rd., Yilan 260-44, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 13:30 2 Yilan Yilan Jinlioujie Post Office 26051 (03)9368-142 No. 100, Sec. 3, Fusing Rd., Yilan 260-51, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:10 3 Yilan Yilan Weishuei Rd. Post Office 26047 (03)9325-072 No. 275, Sec. 2, Jhongshan Rd., Yilan 260-47, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:20 4 Yilan Yuanshan Post Office 26441 (03)9225-073 No. 299, Sec. 1, Yuanshan Rd., Yuanshan Township, Yilan County 264-41, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 11:50 5 Yilan Yuanshan Neicheng Post Office 26444 (03)9221-096 No. 353, Rongguang Rd., Yuanshan, Yilan County 264-44, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 11:40 6 Yilan Yilan Sihou St. Post Office 26044 (03)9329-185 No. 2-1, Sihou St., Yilan 260-44, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:20 7 Yilan Jhuangwei Post Office 26344 (03)9381-705 No. 327, Jhuang 5th Rd., Jhuangwei, Yilan County 263-44, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:00 8 Yilan Yilan Donggang Rd. Post Office 26057 (03)9385-638 No. 32-30, Donggang Rd., Yilan 260-57, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:10 9 Yilan Yilan Dapo Rd. Post Office 26054 (03)9283-195 No. 225, Sec. 2, Dapo Rd., Yilan 260-54, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 11:40 10 Yilan Yilan University Post Office 26047 (03)9356-052 No.1, Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Disputes Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Communication Faculty Publications School of Communication 6-2014 Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Dexin Tian Savannah College of Art and Design, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Chao, Chin-Chung and Tian, Dexin, "Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies" (2014). Communication Faculty Publications. 85. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub/85 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Communication at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 19-47 ISSN: 2333-5866 (Print), 2333-5874 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao1 and Dexin Tian2 Abstract This study explores the communication tactics and grand strategies of each of the involved parties in the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands disputes. Under the theoretical balance between liberal
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations - Basic Facts on the Senkaku Islands and the Recent Incident
    Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations - Basic Facts on the Senkaku Islands and the Recent Incident - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan October 2010 1 Senkaku Islands ◦ Location ◦ The Basic Facts of the Senkaku Islands Obstruction of the execution of official duty by a Chinese fishing trawler (September 7, 2010) Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations Japan’s Position (Statement by MOFA Press Secretary on September 25 2010) 2 China 330km Uotsuri-Shima Okinawa 170km 410km Japan 170km Taiwan Ishigaki-Shima East China Sea Main island of Okinawa Ishigaki-Shima Kuba-Shima Taisho-To About 27km About Uotsuri-Shima 110km Kitako-Shima About 5km Minamiko-Shima ◦ From 1885 on, the Senkaku Islands had been thoroughly surveyed by the Government of Japan through the agencies of Okinawa Prefecture and by way of other methods. Through these surveys, it was confirmed that the Senkaku Islands had been uninhabited and showed no trace of having been under the control of China. Based on this confirmation, the Government of Japan made a Cabinet Decision on 14 January 1895 to erect a marker on the Islands to formally incorporate the Senkaku Islands into the territory of Japan. ◦ Since then, the Senkaku Islands have continuously remained as an integral part of the Nansei Shoto Islands which are the territory of Japan. These islands were neither part of Taiwan nor part of the Pescadores Islands which were ceded to Japan from the Qing Dynasty of China in accordance with Article II of the Treaty of Shimonoseki which came into effect in May of 1895. ◦ Accordingly, the Senkaku Islands are not included in the territory which Japan renounced under Article II of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
    [Show full text]