DOCSLIB.ORG

A Journey of Giraffe – a Practical Guide to Wild Giraffe Translocations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Journey of Giraffe – a Practical Guide to Wild Giraffe Translocations A Journey of Giraffe A practical guide to wild giraffe translocations Developed by the Giraffe Conservation Foundation Contact information [email protected] https://giraffeconservation.org Giraffe Resource Centre https://girafferesourcecentre.org Citation Fennessy, J., Bower, V., Castles, M., Dadone, L., Fennessy, S., Miller, M., Morkel, P. & Ferguson, S. 2020. A Journey of Giraffe – A practical guide to wild giraffe translocations. Giraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia. Authors and their affiliations Dr Julian Fennessy – Giraffe Conservation Foundation Veronica Bower – Independent Dr Madelaine Castles – School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland Dr Liza Dadone – Cheyenne Mountain Zoo Stephanie Fennessy – Giraffe Conservation Foundation Dr Michelle Miller – Rare Species Conservatory Foundation Dr Pete Morkel – Independent wildlife veterinarian Dr Sara Ferguson – Giraffe Conservation Foundation 3 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 6 DOCUMENT PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................ 6 WHAT IS A TRANSLOCATION? ...................................................................................................................... 6 OVERVIEW OF GIRAFFE BIOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 8 TAXONOMY ............................................................................................................................................. 8 MORPHOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................... 9 HABITAT AND FORAGE ............................................................................................................................. 11 BEHAVIOUR ........................................................................................................................................... 11 COMMUNICATION .................................................................................................................................. 12 REPRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 12 TEMPERAMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 12 AGEING ................................................................................................................................................ 13 DENTITION ............................................................................................................................................ 13 CONSERVATION ...................................................................................................................................... 13 CONSERVATION STATUS ................................................................................................................................... 13 CONSERVATION THREATS ................................................................................................................................. 15 PRE-CAPTURE CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................................................ 16 PLANNING A CAPTURE OR TRANSLOCATION EXERCISE ...................................................................................... 16 AREA RECEIVING GIRAFFE ......................................................................................................................... 16 DONOR POPULATION ............................................................................................................................... 17 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 18 TRANSLOCATION PERIOD .......................................................................................................................... 18 CAPTURE ............................................................................................................................................ 20 CHEMICAL IMMOBILISATION ...................................................................................................................... 20 EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................................................... 20 DARTS AND PROJECTORS .................................................................................................................................. 20 ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................................. 21 DARTING .............................................................................................................................................. 22 DARTING ON FOOT .......................................................................................................................................... 22 DARTING FROM A HELICOPTER ........................................................................................................................... 22 DARTING FROM A VEHICLE ................................................................................................................................ 22 DART PLACEMENT ........................................................................................................................................... 22 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE .................................................................................................................................. 23 FEMALE AND CALF ........................................................................................................................................... 24 CHOICE AND DOSE OF IMMOBILISING DRUGS IN THE FIELD ...................................................................................... 24 ANIMALS IN POOR CONDITION ........................................................................................................................... 25 INDUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 25 HANDLING IMMOBILISED GIRAFFE ............................................................................................................... 27 STANDARDISED PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................................ 27 MONITORING ................................................................................................................................................. 27 EYES, EARS AND ROPES ..................................................................................................................................... 28 RESPIRATION/OXYGEN ..................................................................................................................................... 29 BODY TEMPERATURE ....................................................................................................................................... 29 HEART RATE AND BLOOD PRESSURE .................................................................................................................... 30 DART WOUND ................................................................................................................................................ 30 DRAWING BLOOD ............................................................................................................................................ 30 MEDICAL RECORD KEEPING .............................................................................................................................. 30 ADDITIONAL TASKS .......................................................................................................................................... 31 REVERSAL ............................................................................................................................................. 31 OTHER DRUGS AND DOSES FOR IMMOBILISATION ........................................................................................... 31 NONCHEMICAL/MASS CAPTURE ........................................................................................................................ 32 4 TRANSLOCATION ................................................................................................................................ 34 TRANSLOCATION THROUGH BOMAS ............................................................................................................ 34 BOMA TO BOMA ............................................................................................................................................. 34 FIELD TO BOMA .............................................................................................................................................. 34 BOMA TO FIELD .............................................................................................................................................. 34 FIELD TO FIELD ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Browsing and Non-Browsing Extant and Extinct Giraffids Evidence From
    Browsing and non-browsing extant and extinct giraffids Evidence from dental microwear textural analysis Gildas Merceron, Marc Colyn, Denis Geraads To cite this version: Gildas Merceron, Marc Colyn, Denis Geraads. Browsing and non-browsing extant and extinct giraffids Evidence from dental microwear textural analysis. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecol- ogy, Elsevier, 2018, 505, pp.128-139. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.05.036. hal-01834854v2 HAL Id: hal-01834854 https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01834854v2 Submitted on 6 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Browsing and non-browsing extant and extinct giraffids: evidence from dental microwear 2 textural analysis. 3 4 Gildas MERCERON1, Marc COLYN2, Denis GERAADS3 5 6 1 Palevoprim (UMR 7262, CNRS & Université de Poitiers, France) 7 2 ECOBIO (UMR 6553, CNRS & Université de Rennes 1, Station Biologique de Paimpont, 8 France) 9 3 CR2P (UMR 7207, Sorbonne Universités, MNHN, CNRS, UPMC, France) 10 11 1Corresponding author: [email protected] 12 13 Abstract: 14 15 Today, the family Giraffidae is restricted to two genera endemic to the African 16 continent, Okapia and Giraffa, but, with over ten genera and dozens of species, it was far 17 more diverse in the Old World during the late Miocene.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz Responding to An
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ RESPONDING TO AN EMERGENT PLANT PEST-PATHOGEN COMPLEX ACROSS SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SCALES A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES with an emphasis in ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY by Shannon Colleen Lynch December 2020 The Dissertation of Shannon Colleen Lynch is approved: Professor Gregory S. Gilbert, chair Professor Stacy M. Philpott Professor Andrew Szasz Professor Ingrid M. Parker Quentin Williams Acting Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Shannon Colleen Lynch 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv List of Figures vii Abstract x Dedication xiii Acknowledgements xiv Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 References 10 Chapter 2 – Host Evolutionary Relationships Explain 12 Tree Mortality Caused by a Generalist Pest– Pathogen Complex References 38 Chapter 3 – Microbiome Variation Across a 66 Phylogeographic Range of Tree Hosts Affected by an Emergent Pest–Pathogen Complex References 110 Chapter 4 – On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on 180 Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action References 243 iii LIST OF TABLES Chapter 2 Table I Insect vectors and corresponding fungal pathogens causing 47 Fusarium dieback on tree hosts in California, Israel, and South Africa. Table II Phylogenetic signal for each host type measured by D statistic. 48 Table SI Native range and infested distribution of tree and shrub FD- 49 ISHB host species. Chapter 3 Table I Study site attributes. 124 Table II Mean and median richness of microbiota in wood samples 128 collected from FD-ISHB host trees. Table III Fungal endophyte-Fusarium in vitro interaction outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Others
    Staude et al. / Metamorphosis 27: S165–S188 S165 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Others Reference/ Lepidoptera Host plant Locality rearing no. Taxon Subfamily Family Taxon Family M1148 Anoba angulilinea Anobinae Erebidae Dalbergia Fabaceae Tshukudu Game melanoxylon Reserve, Hoedspruit M998 Anoba atripuncta Anobinae Erebidae Ormocarpum Fabaceae Tshukudu Game trichocarpum Reserve, Hoedspruit Gv71 Baniana arvorum Anobinae Erebidae Elephantorrhiza Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, elephantina Magaliesburg 14HSS52 Baniana arvorum Anobinae Erebidae Elephantorrhiza Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, elephantina Magaliesburg 13HSS84 Plecoptera arctinotata Anobinae Erebidae Senegalia caffra Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, Magaliesburg M1020a Plecoptera flaviceps Anobinae Erebidae Dalbergia Fabaceae Casketts, farm, melanoxylon Hoedspruit M317 Bareia incidens Calpinae Erebidae Ficus lutea Moraceae Casketts, farm, (unplaced as to Hoedspruit tribe) 14HSS87 Egnasia vicaria Calpinae Erebidae Afrocanthium Rubiaceae Dlinsa Forest, (unplaced as to mundianum Eshowe tribe) 12HSS163 Exophyla multistriata Calpinae Erebidae Celtis africana Cannabaceae Golden Valley, (unplaced as to Magaliesburg tribe) M416 Exophyla multistriata Calpinae Erebidae Trema orientalis Cannabaceae Sekororo, Tzaneen (unplaced as to (Fed on Celtis tribe) africana) M743 Lacera alope Calpinae Erebidae Pterolobium Fabaceae Moholoholo Rehab (unplaced as to stellatum Centre, Hoedspruit tribe)
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa and Namibia, 20 July - 12 August 2017
    South Africa and Namibia, 20 July - 12 August 2017. VLADIMIR DINETS This trip was an introduction to Africa for my wife and daughter; the latter was two and a half years old at the time and enjoyed it a lot. We had three weeks to kill while a container with our stuff was traveling from New Jersey to our new home in Okinawa. We started from Cape Town, drove east to Hermanus and then north to Oranjemund, flew to Windhoek, briefly explored a few locations up to Etosha, returned to Windhoek and spent one day and two nights in Johannesburg. In 2017, Cape Town area, Namaqualand and Namibia were experiencing a major drought. Full moon was on August 7; that made finding small mammals difficult during the Namibian part of the trip. I had six Sherman traps and caught only twelve rodents of two species (two pygmy mice in the far south and Namaqua rock rats almost everywhere else). Bats seemed absent with few exceptions. I saw almost a hundred species, all but four of which I had seen before (see my 2008 trip report), and removed a few species from my “better view much desired” list. South Africa Simon’s Town is a convenient base for exploring the area; M4 south from it is a good place to look for chacma baboons, while humpback whales are often feeding offshore (we saw one, and heard a few while scuba diving). Watch for South African fur seals, too. Four-striped grass mice (locally called “field mice”) were abundant in wooded parts of penguin colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympus AH Eco Assessment
    FAUNAL AND FLORAL ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR THE PROPOSED ERASMUS PARK PHASE 2 TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT, ERASMUSRAND, GAUTENG. Prepared for Nali Sustainability Solutions February 2019 Section C: Faunal Assessment Prepared by: Scientific Terrestrial Services Report author: C. Hooton Report reviewer: K. Marais (Pr. Sci. Nat) Report Reference: STS 180084 Date: February 2019 Scientific Terrestrial Services CC CC Reg No 2005/122329/23 PO Box 751779 Gardenview 2047 Tel: 011 616 7893 Fax: 086 724 3132 E-mail: [email protected] STS 180084 February 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY From the faunal assessment it can be concluded that there are four habitat units encompassed within the study area, namely Senegalia caffra – Vachellia karroo Woodland, Rocky Grassland, Degraded Hyparrhenia Grassland and Freshwater Habitat. These habitat range from moderately-low to moderately high sensitivities Based on the impact assessment, the impacts on faunal habitat, diversity and SCC within the different habitat units varies from low to high significance during the construction and the operational phase of the project prior to mitigation taking place. With effective mitigation implemented, all impacts may be reduced to very-low to medium-low levels. It is the opinion of the ecologists that this study provides the relevant information required in order to implement an Integrated Environmental Management (IEM) plan and to ensure that the best long-term use of the ecological resources in the study area will be made in support of the principle of sustainable development. Scientific Terrestrial Services (STS) was appointed to conduct a faunal and floral ecological assessment for the proposed Erasmus Park development on the remaining extent of the farm Waterkloof 378 JR, Erasmusrand, Gauteng Province (hereafter referred to as the ‘study area’).
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe & Botswana TRIP REPORT Nov 2017 Summary
    ZIMBABWE & BOTSWANA WILDLIFE SAFARI November 3-15, 2017 TRIP REPORT Summary by Adrian Binns Mana Pools, Zimbabwe Our 12-day African safari began on the eastern edge of Mana Pools National Park in northern Zimbabwe. From our bush camps at Ruckomechi and neighbouring Little Ruckomechi, we enjoyed exploring a range of habitats teeming with wonderful wildlife. Elephants were among the first to greet us, as they roamed freely near the tents, even venturing next to the swimming pool! We kept a watchful eye and careful distance, in awe of the giant pachyderms. What a welcome treat! Our camps overlooked the mighty Zambezi river towards Zambia’s Rift Valley escarpment, providing excellent opportunity for relaxing afternoon boat rides. We drifted slowly up to wallowing pods of hippos, basking crocodiles, and African Skimmers loafing on exposed narrow sand strips. In steeply-eroded river banks, White- fronted and Southern Carmine Bee-eaters excavated their tunnel nests. The location helps keep predators at bay, but not all of them! On two consecutive afternoons we watched a Nile Water Monitor dig into the tunnels with its long sharp claws, and come out with a youngster, much to the chagrin of the parents. We watched elephants trek through tall grasses of river islands, and cross channels to reach the opposite bank. We cheered when one struggling baby elephant finally made it across. One evening we were moored on a riverbank enjoying sundowners, when an inquisitive elephant approached to within feet of Jane who was seated at the front of the boat. It was a heart-stopping moment to be face-to-face with such a huge animal – so close we could count the eyelashes – but we had nowhere to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Specialist Report for the Upgrade of Road D4407 Between Hluvukani and Timbavati (7.82 Km), Road D4409 at Welverdiend (6.88
    ECOLOGICAL SPECIALIST REPORT FOR THE UPGRADE OF ROAD D4407 BETWEEN HLUVUKANI AND TIMBAVATI (7.82 KM), ROAD D4409 AT WELVERDIEND (6.88 KM) AND ROAD D4416/2 BETWEEN WELVERDIEND AND _v001 ROAD P194/1 (1.19 KM) FOR THE ROAD D4416 DEVIATION 007 _ OPS IN THE EHLANZENI REGION OF THE MPUMALANGA PROVINCE PREPARED FOR: DATED: 22 January 2021 PREPARED BY: Ronaldo Retief Pr.Sci.Nat. Pr. EAPASA M · 072 666 6348 E · [email protected] T · +27 21 702 2884 26 Bell Close, Westlake Business Park F · +27 86 555 0693 Westlake 7945, Cape Town NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd | Reg No: 2007/023691/07 | VAT No. 4450208915 REAL GROWTH FOR PEOPLE, PLANET AND BUSINESS www.ncc-group.co.za 1 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE Specialist Name Nico-Ronaldo Retief Declaration of I declare, as a specialist appointed in terms of the National Environmental Management Independence Act (Act No 108 of 1998) and the associated 2014 Amended Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, that: • I act as the independent specialist in this application. • I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant. • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work. • I have expertise in conducting the specialist report relevant to this application, including knowledge of the Act, Regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity. • I will comply with the Act, Regulations, and all other applicable legislation. • I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Density of Galago Moholi at Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, South Africa
    African Primates 12: 1-8 (2017)/ 1 Species Density of Galago moholi at Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, South Africa Ian S. Ray1,2,3, Brandi T. Wren2,4, and Evelyn J. Bowers1 1Department of Anthropology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN USA; 2Applied Behavioural Ecology and Ecosystem Research Unit, University of South Africa; 3Department of Social Sciences, Community College of Aurora, Aurora, Colorado USA;4Department of Anthropology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA Abstract: Galagos are a poorly studied group of nocturnal primates endemic to sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in regard to distribution in southern Africa. We conducted a population survey of Galago moholi along the road system of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve in Mpumalanga, South Africa, during the winter months of June and July, 2011. Results from 151 km of transects that were driven over 23 survey hours indicate that the population density of G. moholi is several times lower than previously reported in similar areas. We estimate the population density at Loskop Dam to be between 1.4 and 5.1 animals/km2, suggesting a population estimate for the entire reserve of 296-1029 animals. This number is substantially lower than the expected density of 95 animals/km2 and total population of 20,000 animals based on previously published density estimates. Low population density may be due to an unknown environmental condition that, in addition, excludes other Galago species from the reserve. Key words: Galago, population density, strepsirrhine, bushbaby INTRODUCTION Bushbabies, or galagos, are small nocturnal Galago moholi averages 158 g and 438 mm in primates endemic to sub-Saharan Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparisons of Schansitherium Tafeli with Samotherium Boissieri (Giraffidae, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Gansu Province, China
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Comparisons of Schansitherium tafeli with Samotherium boissieri (Giraffidae, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Gansu Province, China 1,2,3 4 5 4,6 Sukuan HouID *, Michael Cydylo , Melinda Danowitz , Nikos SolouniasID 1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing, China, 3 College of Earth and Planetary a1111111111 Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 4 Department of Anatomy, New York a1111111111 Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, United States of America, a1111111111 5 Department of Pediatrics, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, United States of America, a1111111111 6 Department of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of a1111111111 America * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: Hou S, Cydylo M, Danowitz M, Solounias We are describing and figuring for the first time skulls of Schansitherium tafeli, which are N (2019) Comparisons of Schansitherium tafeli with Samotherium boissieri (Giraffidae, Mammalia) abundant in the Gansu area of China from the Late Miocene. They were animals about the from the Late Miocene of Gansu Province, China. size of Samotherium with shorter necks that had two pairs of ossicones that merge at the PLoS ONE 14(2): e0211797. https://doi.org/ base, which is unlike Samotherium. The anterior ossicones consist of anterior lineations, 10.1371/journal.pone.0211797 which may represent growth lines. They were likely mixed feeders similar to Samotherium.
    [Show full text]
  • CONCERTED ACTION for the GIRAFFE (Giraffa Camelopardalis) 1 Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at Its 13Th Meeting (Gandhinagar, February 2020)
    CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/Concerted Action 13.3 MIGRATORY Original: English SPECIES CONCERTED ACTION FOR THE GIRAFFE (Giraffa camelopardalis) 1 Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its 13th Meeting (Gandhinagar, February 2020) The proposal for the Concerted Action for the Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) was first adopted by the 1st Giraffe Experts Meeting held in Windhoek, Namibia from 9 to 11 July 2019 (i). Proponents: Cameroon, Chad, Ethiopia, Kenya, Niger, the United Republic of Tanzania, Zimbabwe (ii). Target species, lower taxon or population, or group of taxa with needs in common: Class: Mammalia Order: Artiodactyla Family: Giraffidae Genus, Species: Giraffa camelopardalis (Linnaeus 1758) Updated Giraffe taxonomy IUCN Red List taxonomy IUCN Red List (Fennessy et al. 2016a, Winter et (Muller et al. 2018) Category al. 2018) Vulnerable Giraffa camelopardalis peralta Giraffa camelopardalis peralta (Fennessy et al. (West African Giraffe) (West African Giraffe) 2018a) Critically Giraffa camelopardalis antiquorum Giraffa camelopardalis antiquorum Endangered (Kordofan Giraffe) (Kordofan Giraffe) (Fennessy & Marais 2018) Critically Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis Endangered (Nubian Giraffe) (Nubian Giraffe) (Wube et al. 2018) Near Threatened Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis Giraffa camelopardalis rothschildi (Fennessy et al. (Nubian Giraffe) (Rothschild’s Giraffe) 2018b) Giraffa reticulata Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata Endangered (Reticulated Giraffe) (Reticulated Giraffe) (Muneza et al. 2018) Giraffa tippelskirchi Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi Endangered (Masai Giraffe) (Masai Giraffe) (Bolger et al. 2019) 1 The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CMS Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats 0-Year
    Table S1: The total number of recorded species per habitat (in brackets) and the number of shared species across habitats. 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- Restored Habitats Reference old old old combined 0-year-old (36 spp.) - 25 spp. 24 spp. - 25 spp. 3-year-old (40 spp.) 25 spp. - 28 spp. - 30 spp. 5-year-old (44 spp.) 24 spp. 28 spp. - - 40 spp. Restored combined (59 - - - - 49 spp. spp.) Reference (70 spp.) 25 spp. 30 spp. 40 spp. 49 spp. - Table S2: Checklist of plant species found in the restored and reference habitats. Species Family Upland area Lowland area 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- old old old Reference old old old Reference habitat habitat habitat habiat habitat habitat habitat habitat Harpephyllum caffrum Bernh. Anacardiaceae X X X X X X X - Protorhus longifolia (Bernh.) Engl. Anacardiaceae - X X X - - - X Sclerocrya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro Anacardiaceae - - - - - - - - Searsia chirindensis (Baker f.) Moffett Anacardiaceae - - X X - X X X Searsia dentata (Thunb.) F.A.Barkley Anacardiaceae - - - - - - - - Searsia lucida (L.) F.A.Barkley Anacardiaceae X - - - - X - - Searsia pentheri (Zahlbr.) Moffett Anacardiaceae - - X - - - - X Searsia rehmanniana (Engl.) Moffet Anacardiaceae X - - X - X X - Annona senegalensi Pers. Annonaceae - - - - - - - - Rauvolfia caffra Sond. Apocynaceae X X - X - - - X Tabernaemontana ventricosa Hochst. ex A.DC. Apocynaceae X X - X - - - X Cussonia spicata Thunb. Araliaceae - - - - - - - - Cussonia zuluensis Strey Araliaceae - - - X - - X - Phoenix reclinata Jacq. Arecaceae X X - - - - X X Aloe ferox Mill. Asphodelaceae - - X - - - X - Brachylaena discolor DC. Asteraceae X X X - - X - - Kigelia africana (Lam.) Benth.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Giraffe Conservation Programme
    Namibia Giraffe Conservation Programme QUARTERLY UPDATE May – July 2018 At our home base in Namibia, the Giraffe Conservation Foundation (GCF) runs a comprehensive programme across the country with a focus on giraffe conservation research and environmental education. While this report focuses on the conservation side, you can read more about the environmental education programme in the regular KEEP Update reports online at https://giraffeconservation.org/programmes/keep/. The past few months have seen some exciting developments in our Northwest Namibia Programme, as well as a continuation of our countrywide giraffe assessments. If you follow our updates regularly, you might want to skip forward to the brand-new updates and give the background information a miss, but you might also find some interesting information that you were not aware of. Background In partnership with University College Cork (UCD, Ireland) and the Namibian University of Science and Technology (NUST), GCF’s Northwest Namibia Programme focuses on monitoring and supporting the long-term conservation and research of Namibia’s desert-dwelling giraffe. These giraffe roam throughout the northern Namib Desert in the country’s northwest. Our work has focused on the ephemeral Hoanib and Hoarusib Rivers, covering an area of approx. 4,500km2, but is slowly expanding north to include a total area of >10,000km2. The area extends across communal conservancies in the east (which support both wildlife and domestic livestock) into the Skeleton Coast National Park bordered by the Atlantic Ocean to the west. With only a few millimetres of annual rainfall, the programme area is arid to hyper-arid and the wildlife is well adapted to this harsh environment.
    [Show full text]