Ontogenetic Allometry of the Postcranial Skeleton of the Giraffe (Giraffa Camelopardalis), with Application to Giraffe Life History, Evolution and Palaeontology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Astragalar Morphology of Selected Giraffidae
RESEARCH ARTICLE Astragalar Morphology of Selected Giraffidae Nikos Solounias1,2☯*, Melinda Danowitz1☯ 1 Department of Anatomy, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, United States of America, 2 Department of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY, United States of America ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract The artiodactyl astragalus has been modified to exhibit two trochleae, creating a double pullied structure allowing for significant dorso-plantar motion, and limited mediolateral motion. The astragalus structure is partly influenced by environmental substrates, and cor- respondingly, morphometric studies can yield paleohabitat information. The present study establishes terminology and describes detailed morphological features on giraffid astragali. Each giraffid astragalus exhibits a unique combination of anatomical characteristics. The giraffid astragalar morphologies reinforce previously established phylogenetic relationships. We find that the enlargement of the navicular head is a feature shared by all giraffids, and that the primitive giraffids possess exceptionally tall astragalar heads in relation to the total astragalar height. The sivatheres and the okapi share a reduced notch on the lateral edge OPEN ACCESS of the astragalus. We find that Samotherium is more primitive in astragalar morphologies Citation: Solounias N, Danowitz M (2016) Astragalar than Palaeotragus, which is reinforced -
Short Title: Ecological Properties of Ruminal Microbiota
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 24 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0628.v1 CHARACTERISTICS OF RUMINAL MICROBIAL COMMUNITY: EVOLUTIONARY AND ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES AMLAN KUMAR PATRA* Department of Animal Nutrition, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Belgachia, K.B. Sarani 37, Kolkata 700037, India *Corresponding author. Email address: [email protected] (A.K. Patra) Short title: Ecological properties of ruminal microbiota 0 © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 24 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0628.v1 CHARACTERISTICS OF RUMINAL MICROBIAL COMMUNITY: EVOLUTIONARY AND ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES Abstract Ruminants perhaps appeared about 50 million years ago (Ma). Five ruminant families had been extinct and about 200 species in 6 ruminant families are living today. The first ruminant family probably was small omnivore without functional ruminal microbiota to digest fiber. Subsequently, other ruminant families evolved around 18-23 Ma along with woodlands and grasslands. Probably, ruminants started to consume selective and highly nutritious plant leaves and grasses similar to concentrates. By 5-11 Ma, grasslands expanded and some ruminants used more grass in their diets with comparatively low nutritive values and high fibers. Historically, humans have domesticated 9 ruminant species that are mostly utilizer of low quality forages for human benefits. Thus, the non-functional rumen microbiota to predominantly concentrate fermenting microbiota, followed by predominantly fiber digesting microbiota had evolved for mutual complementary benefits of holobiont over the million years. The core microbiome of ruminant species seems the resultant of hologenome interaction in an evolutionary unit. -
Original Giraffokeryx Punjabiensis (Artiodactyla, Ruminantia, Giraffidae) from Lower Siwaliks (Chinji Formation) of Dhok Bun
Original Giraffokeryx punjabiensis (Artiodactyla, Ruminantia, Giraffidae) from Lower Siwaliks (Chinji Formation) of Dhok Bun Ameer Khatoon, Pakistan Khizar Samiullah1*, Muhammad Akhtar2, Abdul Ghaffar3, Muhammad Akbar Khan4 Received : 28 January 2011 ; Accepted : 13 September 2011 Abstract Fossil remains of Giraffokeryx punjabiensis (premolar and molar teeth belonging to the upper and lower jaws) have been collected and discussed from Chinji Formation of Dhok Bun Ameer Khatoon (32o 47’ 26.4” N, 72° 55’ 35.7” E). All these (twenty one) specimens are isolated teeth, which provide new data and give valuable information on the biostratigrphy and paleoecology of Giraffokeryx punjabiensis as well as the stratigraphy and paleoclimates of these Miocene rocks of the Chakwal district, Pakistan. Keywords: Giraffokeryx punjabiensis, isolated teeth, Chinji Formation, biostratigraphy Miocene rocks, Chakwal district. Introduction Dhok Bun Ameer Khatoon (DBAK) is poorly known fossil ramii and a number of isolated teeth. Mathew4 studied site of the Siwaliks. Previous pioneer workers 1,2,3,4,5 did the material of this species at the Indian Museum, not visit this site nor mentioned it in their faunal list. Kolkata (Calcutta), and recognized a larger and a During the last decade, this site had got attraction of smaller form. However, Colbert5 suggested there was researchers when few fossils were unearthed during a continuous size gradation of the dental material of the mechanical work for construction of dam for water the species through the Chinji to the Nagri Formation storage purposes. Girafids, bovids, tragulids, suids, and therefore that no such size division exists in the hominids, rhinos, chilothers anthracothers and carnivors material of the genus Giraffokeryx. -
AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Tnui Amermican MUSZUM W Number 632 Near York Cityratt1ral Historay June 9, 1933
AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Tnui AmERMICAN MUSZUM W Number 632 Near York CityRATt1RAL HisToRay June 9, 1933 56.9, 735 G: 14.71, 4 A SKULL AND MANDIBLE OF GIRAFFOKERYX PUNJABIENSIS PILGRIM By EDWIN H. COLBERT The genus Giraffokeryx was founded by Dr. G. E. Pilgrim to desig- nate a primitive Miocene giraffe from the lower Siwalik beds of northern India. Doctor Pilgrim, in a series of papers,' described Giraffokeryx on the basis of fragmental and scattered dentitions.. Naturally, Pilgrim's knowledge of the genus was rather incomplete, and he was unable tQ formulate any opinions as to the structure.of the skull or mandible. An almost complete skull, found in the northern Punjab in 1922 by Mr. Barnum Brown of the American Museum, proves to be that of Giraffokeryx, and it exhibits such striking and unusual characters that a separate description of it has seemed necessary. This skull, together with numerous teeth and a lower. jaw, gives us. a very good comprehen- sion of the genus which forms the subject.of this paper. The drawings of the skull were made by John. C. Germann, and the remaining ones were done by Margaret Matthew. MATERIAL DESCRIBED Only the material referred to in this description will here be listed. There' are a great many specimens of Gir'affokeryx in the American'Mu- seum collection, but since 'most of them are'teeth, they will not be considered at this time. A subsequent paper, dealing with the American Museum Siwalik collection in detail, wtyill contain a complete list of the Giraffokeryx material. -
Sivatherium (Artiodactyla, Ruminantia, Giraffidae) from the Upper Siwaliks, Pakistan
Khan et al. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 21(2): 2011, Page: J.202 Anim.-206Plant Sci. 21(2):2011 ISSN: 1018-7081 SIVATHERIUM (ARTIODACTYLA, RUMINANTIA, GIRAFFIDAE) FROM THE UPPER SIWALIKS, PAKISTAN A. A. Khan, M. A. Khan*, M. Iqbal**, M. Akhtar*** and M. Sarwar*** Institute of Pure & Applied Biology, Zoology Division, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan *Zoology Department, GC University, Faisalabad, **Zoology Department, Government College Science, Wahdat Road, Lahore ***Zoology Department, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Punjab University, Lahore Correspondence author e-mail: <[email protected]>; ABSTRACT A complete lower molar series of giraffid remains from the Pleistocene locality of the village Sardhok (Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan) has been identified as belonging to Sivatherium sp. The comparison of the material was made with several Siwalik representatives of the giraffids. The giraffid Sivatherium is a gigantic giraffid found in the early Pleistocene sediments of the Upper Siwaliks. The village Sardhok locality has yielded one of the best collections of Giraffidae from the early Pleistocene of the Siwaliks. The locality belongs to the Pinjor Formation of the Upper Siwaliks (2.6-0.6 Ma). Key words: Giraffids, Sivatherium, Upper Siwaliks, Pleistocene, Pinjor Formation. INTRODUCTION The material described here comes from the outcrops of the village Sardhok, Gujrat district, Punjab, The fossil Chinese record shown by Bohlin Pakistan. In the Potwar Plateau, the Upper Siwalik is well (1927) and that of Asia shown by Colbert (1935) exposed in the Pabbi hills situated in the east of the River indicates that the giraffids had their origin in the Jhelum. The village Sardhok is situated in these low Holarctic Region. -
Discovery of a Bramatherium (Giraffid) Horn-Core From
Geol. Bull. Punjab Univ. Vol. 40-41, 2005-6, pp 21-25 21 DISCOVERY OF A BRAMATHERIUM (GIRAFFID) HORN CORE FROM THE DHOK PATHAN FORMATION (MIDDLE SIWALIKS) OF HASNOT, POTWAR PLATEAU, PAKISTAN MUHAMMAD AKBAR KHAN, MUHAMMAD AKHTAR Department of Zoology, Quid-e-Azam Campus, University of the Punjab, Lahore (54590), Pakistan Email: [email protected] AND MUHAMMAD ANWAR QURESHI Institute of Geology, University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Muzaffrabad, Pakistan Abstract: The recent collection from Hasnot has brought about the discovery of a horn core belongs to a gigantic Upper Tertiary giraffe. The giraffids are abundant in the Upper Tertiary rocks of the Siwaliks and mostly diverse in the Tertiary rocks of Hasnot and Dhok Pathan. The studied specimen is found from the locality H 7 situated at 4 kilo meters west of the Hasnot village. INTRODUCTION giraffids (Bohlin, 1926) and has already been noted in Middle Miocene ones (Gentry et al., 1999). The Hasnot The Late Miocene to early Pleistocene deposited in the village (Lat. 32° 49′ N: Long. 73° 18′ E) is situated at elongated foreland basin of the Himalayas are well known about 70 km west of the Jhelum city in the Potwar Plateau and have been studied intensively for many years of the northern Pakistan (Fig. 1). The village is (Biswas, 1994; Behrensmeyer et al., 1997). Although surrounded by extensive Neogene freshwater sedimentary Tertiary Vertebrate remains have been known from the rocks. The region of the Hasnot exposes the most Siwaliks for more than a century however there had been complete sequence of the Siwalik Group and yields a mostly foreigners who collected the remains (Falconer diversified assemblage of the Middle Siwalik Formation. -
First Bone-Cracking Dog Coprolites Provide New Insight
RESEARCH ARTICLE First bone-cracking dog coprolites provide new insight into bone consumption in Borophagus and their unique ecological niche Xiaoming Wang1,2,3*, Stuart C White4, Mairin Balisi1,3, Jacob Biewer5,6, Julia Sankey6, Dennis Garber1, Z Jack Tseng1,2,7 1Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, United States; 2Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, United States; 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; 4School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; 5Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, United States; 6Department of Geology, California State University Stanislaus, Turlock, United States; 7Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, United States Abstract Borophagine canids have long been hypothesized to be North American ecological ‘avatars’ of living hyenas in Africa and Asia, but direct fossil evidence of hyena-like bone consumption is hitherto unknown. We report rare coprolites (fossilized feces) of Borophagus parvus from the late Miocene of California and, for the first time, describe unambiguous evidence that these predatory canids ingested large amounts of bone. Surface morphology, micro-CT analyses, and contextual information reveal (1) droppings in concentrations signifying scent-marking behavior, similar to latrines used by living social carnivorans; (2) routine consumption of skeletons; *For correspondence: (3) undissolved bones inside coprolites indicating gastrointestinal similarity to modern striped and [email protected] brown hyenas; (4) B. parvus body weight of ~24 kg, reaching sizes of obligatory large-prey hunters; ~ Competing interests: The and (5) prey size ranging 35–100 kg. -
Comparisons of Schansitherium Tafeli with Samotherium Boissieri (Giraffidae, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Gansu Province, China
RESEARCH ARTICLE Comparisons of Schansitherium tafeli with Samotherium boissieri (Giraffidae, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Gansu Province, China 1,2,3 4 5 4,6 Sukuan HouID *, Michael Cydylo , Melinda Danowitz , Nikos SolouniasID 1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing, China, 3 College of Earth and Planetary a1111111111 Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 4 Department of Anatomy, New York a1111111111 Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, United States of America, a1111111111 5 Department of Pediatrics, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, United States of America, a1111111111 6 Department of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of a1111111111 America * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: Hou S, Cydylo M, Danowitz M, Solounias We are describing and figuring for the first time skulls of Schansitherium tafeli, which are N (2019) Comparisons of Schansitherium tafeli with Samotherium boissieri (Giraffidae, Mammalia) abundant in the Gansu area of China from the Late Miocene. They were animals about the from the Late Miocene of Gansu Province, China. size of Samotherium with shorter necks that had two pairs of ossicones that merge at the PLoS ONE 14(2): e0211797. https://doi.org/ base, which is unlike Samotherium. The anterior ossicones consist of anterior lineations, 10.1371/journal.pone.0211797 which may represent growth lines. They were likely mixed feeders similar to Samotherium. -
I.—A Retrospect of Palaeontology in the Last Forty Years
THE GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE. NEW SERIES. DECADE V. VOL. I. No. IV. —APRIL, 1904. ORIGI3STAL ARTICLES. I.—A KETROSPECT OF PALAEONTOLOGY IN TIIE LAST FOBTY YEABS. (Concluded from the March Number, p. 106.) EEPTILIA ET AVES.—Our two greatest Anatomists of the past century, Owen and Huxley, both contributed to this section of our palseozoological record. Owen (in 1865) described some remains of a small air-breathing vertebrate, Anihrakerpeton crassosteum, from the Coal-shales of Glamorganshire, corresponding with those described by Dawson from the Coal-measures of Nova Scotia ; and in 1870 he noticed some remains of Plesiosaurus Hoodii (Owen) from New Zealand, possibly of Triaasic age. Huxley made us acquainted with an armed Dinosaur from the Chalk-marl of Folkestone, allied to Scelidosaurus (Liassic), ITylao- saurus and Polacanthus (Wealden), the teeth and dermal spines of which he described and figured (1867), and in the following year he figured and determined two new genera of Triassic reptilia, Saurosternon Bainii and Pristerodon McKayi, from the Dicynodont beds of South Africa. E. Etheridge recorded (in 1866) the discovery by Dr. E. P. Wright and Mr. Brownrig of several new genera of Labyrinthodonts in the Coal-shales of Jarrow Colliery, Kilkenny, Ireland, com- municated by Huxley to the Royal Irish Academy, an account of which appeared later on in the GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE in the same year by Dr. E. P. Wright (p. 165), the genera given being Urocordylus, Ophiderpeton, Ichthyerpeton, Keraterpeton, Lepterpeton, and Anthracosaurus. Besides these genera there were indications of the existence of several others (not described), making at that time a total of thirteen genera from the Carboniferous formation in general. -
The Evolution of Animal Weapons
The Evolution of Animal Weapons Douglas J. Emlen Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008. 39:387-413 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on animal diversity, sexual selection, male competition, horns, antlers, tusks September 2, 2008 The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Abstract Systematics is online at ecolsys.annualreviews.org Males in many species invest substantially in structures that are used in com- This article's doi: bat with rivals over access to females. These weapons can attain extreme 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173 502 proportions and have diversified in form repeatedly. I review empirical lit- Copyright © 2008 by Annual Reviews. erature on the function and evolution of sexually selected weapons to clarify All rights reserved important unanswered questions for future research. Despite their many 1543-592X/08/1201-0387$20.00 shapes and sizes, and the multitude of habitats within which they function, animal weapons share many properties: They evolve when males are able to defend spatially restricted critical resources, they are typically the most variable morphological structures of these species, and this variation hon- estly reflects among-individual differences in body size or quality. What is not clear is how, or why, these weapons diverge in form. The potential for male competition to drive rapid divergence in weapon morphology remains one of the most exciting and understudied topics in sexual selection research today. 3*7 INTRODUCTION Sexual selection is credited with the evolution of nature's most extravagant structures, and these include showy male adornments that are attractive to females (ornaments) and an arsenal of outgrowths that function in male-male combat (weapons) (Darwin 1871). -
AN AMERICAN FOSSIL GIRAFFE Giraffa Nebrascensis, Sp. Nov
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska State Museum 1925 AN AMERICAN FOSSIL GIRAFFE irG affa nebrascensis, sp. nov. W. D. Matthew E. H. Barbour Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museumbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons, Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Paleobiology Commons, Paleontology Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. BULLETIN 4 VOLUME 1 APRIL 1925 THE NEBRASKA STATE MUSEUM ERWIN H. BARBOUR, Director AN AMERICAN FOSSIL GIRAFFE Giraffa nebrascensis, sp. nov. By W. D. MATTHEW E. H. BARBOUR A fragment of the lower jaw of a large fossil mammal with two well-worn teeth was dug up in June 1918, at a depth of 20 feet, while digging a cess pool at Bradshaw, York County, Nebraska. This unique specimen, accessioned 7-7-18, was brought to the Nebraska State Museum by A. Archie Dorsey, and was donated by C. B. Palmet, both of Bradshaw. It undoubtedly occurred in loess, which is thickly as well. as extensively de veloped in this region. It is a ruminant jaw, the teeth preserved being P4 and m 1 • The characteristic pattern of the premolar excludes refer ence to the Bovidae, and leaves the choice between the Gi raffidae, Pa~aeomerycidae, and certain large Cervidae. -
Giraffe Giraffa Camelopardalis
SPECIES PROFILE Giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis Image: Herbert Bieser May 2021 Author: H. Hesterman, BSc. MSc. PhD. Table of Contents 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Scientific Classification...................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Common Name .................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Subspecies .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Taxonomy........................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Description ............................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Conservation and Legal Status............................................................................................... 6 3.1 Legal Status ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.0 Life History ............................................................................................................................ 8 5.0 Habitat Requirements and Preferences ................................................................................ 10 6.0 Natural Geographic Range ..................................................................................................