AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Tnui Amermican MUSZUM W Number 632 Near York Cityratt1ral Historay June 9, 1933

AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Tnui AmERMICAN MUSZUM W Number 632 Near York CityRATt1RAL HisToRay June 9, 1933 56.9, 735 G: 14.71, 4 A SKULL AND MANDIBLE OF GIRAFFOKERYX PUNJABIENSIS PILGRIM By EDWIN H. COLBERT The genus Giraffokeryx was founded by Dr. G. E. Pilgrim to desig- nate a primitive Miocene giraffe from the lower Siwalik beds of northern India. Doctor Pilgrim, in a series of papers,' described Giraffokeryx on the basis of fragmental and scattered dentitions.. Naturally, Pilgrim's knowledge of the genus was rather incomplete, and he was unable tQ formulate any opinions as to the structure.of the skull or mandible. An almost complete skull, found in the northern Punjab in 1922 by Mr. Barnum Brown of the American Museum, proves to be that of Giraffokeryx, and it exhibits such striking and unusual characters that a separate description of it has seemed necessary. This skull, together with numerous teeth and a lower. jaw, gives us. a very good comprehen- sion of the genus which forms the subject.of this paper. The drawings of the skull were made by John. C. Germann, and the remaining ones were done by Margaret Matthew. MATERIAL DESCRIBED Only the material referred to in this description will here be listed. There' are a great many specimens of Gir'affokeryx in the American'Mu- seum collection, but since 'most of them are'teeth, they will not be considered at this time. A subsequent paper, dealing with the American Museum Siwalik collection in detail, wtyill contain a complete list of the Giraffokeryx material. Amer. Mus. No. 19475.-A skull, complete back of'the muzzle. The cheek teeth are preserved on both sides. The skull has been crushed to some extent. From the lower portion of the Middle Siwaliks, 1,000 feet below the Bhandar bone bed,2 and one mile south of Nathot in the Punjab. Amer. Mus. No. 19611.-Unassociated teeth. Lower Siwaliks, 200 feet above the level of Chinji Rest House and four miles west of that location, Punjab. lPilgrim, 0. E. 1910. 'Notices of New Mammalian Genera and Species from the Tertiaries of India.' Rec. Geol. Surv. India, XL, Pt. I, p. 69. 1911. 'The Fossil Giraffidae of India.' Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Pal. Indica, N.S., IV, No. 1, pp. 14-17; PI. 1, figs. 4, 5; P1. It, figs. 1-16. .2The Bhandar bed was named by Pilgrim, from the village of Bhandar in the Jhelum district, Rawalpindi division of the northern Punjab. He considered this 'as an unfossiliferous horizon, but Brown, in 19?22 opened a mixed quarry at this level, which yielded characteristic nmiddle Siwalik fossil. The quarry was located one half mile north of Bhandar village. For the original designation of'this horizon the reader is referred to: Pilgrim, G. E. 1913; 'Correlatiorf of the Siwaliks with Mammal Horizons of Europe. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, XLIII, Pt. 4, p. 277, P1. xxvi. -2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES [No. 632 Amer. Mus. No. 19472.-A right maxilla, with P3-M3. Lower portion of the middle Siwaliks, 1,200 feet below the Bhandar bone bed and one mile south of Nathot. Amer. Mus. No. 19587.-The right ramus of a mandible, containing P2-M3. Lower Siwaliks, 200 feet above the level of Chinji Rest House and one and one half miles north of that place. It may be seen from the above list that Giraffokeryx punjabiensis extends through the lower Siwaliks into the lower portions of the middle Siwaliks. MORPHOLOGY OF THE SKULL The skull of Giraffokeryx represents an animal of medium size and of peculiar form. As restored, it would measure some 500 millimeters in length, which though of fair size for the general run of ruminants, is .small for the giraffes. The most striking features of this skull are the four horn cores, an anterior and a posterior pair, the former rising from the forward extremities of the frontals, and the latter from broad bases that rest partly on the frontals and partly on the parietals. The anterior *horn cores spring from a common base, which is located above the first and second molars (perhaps it might be better to say that they are con- fluent at their bases), and they diverge laterally at an angle of approximately 105 degrees. These horn cores are directed posteriorly to a very slight extent, about 15 degrees. The posterior horns are widely separated basally. They arise directly back of the orbits, diverging laterally at an angle of approximately 80 degrees. Moreover, these horn cores are directed backwardly to an extent such that, as seen from the side, their median axes make angles of about 30 degrees with the perpen- dicular. These posterior horn cores are somewhat convex along their anterior borders, and at their bases, both on the anterior and the posterior edges, there are large rugose protuberances, as if in life there were basal accessory knobs or branches. Due to the great backward growth of these horn cores, their bases form a partial roof over the temporal fossae. The true homologies of the "horn cores" of Giraffokeryx have been .very perplexing, because since the skull is that of an old animal, the sutures are ankylosed to an extent that they have been largely obliterated. By a microscopic examination the naso-frontal suture has been estab- lished just anterior to the base of the front horn cores. The frontal- parietal suture can not be definitely located, but it would seem to cross the skull at a point about opposite the median portion of the posterior horn cores. The posterior horn cores of Giraffokeryx are therefore quite homologous with the similar structures in Palaeotragus and Samotherium, Asiatic Miocene and Pliocene giraffes, characterized by one pair of well 19331 SKULL OF GIRAFFOKERYX PUNJABIENSIS 3 developed supraorbital horn cores. But the anterior pair in Giraffokeryx are without homologues among any of the Giraffidae, and must therefore be considered as neomorphic structures. Of course there is a superficial resemblance between the skull of Giraffokeryx and that of the North American genus, Syndyoceras, because in both of these forms there are two pairs of horns, one pair being approximately supraorbital, while the other pair is placed above the muzzle. The resemblances between these genera are, however, attribut- able to functional analogies rather than to homologies, because while the Adt19475 Fig. 1.-Giraffokeryx punjabienris Pilgrim. Amer. Mus. No. 19475. Skull, right lateral view. Restored muzzle based on comparisons with Palaeotragus and Okapia. One-fourth natural size. anterior horns are frontal upgrowths in Giraffokeryx, they are derived in Syndyoceras from the premaxillaries. In both genera the posterior horns are more nearly homologous, being frontal in Syndyoceras, and fronto- parietal in Giraffokeryx. Otherwise the skulls and dentitions show the taxonomic separateness that would be expected in these genera, for the Siwalik form belongs of course to the Giraffidae, and the North American genus is a member of the Protoceratidae, families that are related in kind, but which are nevertheless quite distinct from each other. Synrhetoceras, recently described by Stirton, shows an accentuation of the Syndyoceras type of skull, and these two genera are closely related to each other.' iBarbour, E. H. 1905. 'Notice of a New Fossil Mammal from Sioux County, Nebraska.' Neb. Geol. Surv., II, P1. 3, four pages, one plate. (Syndyoceras cooki.) Stirton, R. A. 1932. 'A New Genus of Artiodactyla from the Clarendon Lower Pliocene of Texas.' Univ. of California Publ., Bull. Dept. Geol. Sci., XXI, No. 6, pp. 148-149. (Synthetoceras tricornatus.) AM.19475 4 Fig. ?.-Giraffokeryx punjabienis Pilgrim. Amer. Mus. No. 19475. Skull, dorsal view. Muzzle restored. One-fourth natural size. 4 1933] SKULL OF GIRAFFOKERYX PUNJABIENSIS 5 Lankester,1 in a series of papers, has demonstrated how in the mod- ern okapi and giraffe, the "horns," or the ossicones as Lankester defined them, ate developed in the skin as separated elements, becoming united with the skull as the animal approaches maturity. In the okapi, a persistent primitive form, having, like Palaeotragus and Samotherium, one pair of supraorbital horns, the ossicone coalesces with the frontal bone, and in the adult animal is firmly attached to that element. On the other hand, the ossicone in the foetal or newly born giraffe develops first above the parietal bone, but in consequence of growth factors it spreads anteriorly, so that in the adult it becomes attached to both the parietal and the frontal bones. A growth process similar to that of the recent forms must have marked the development of the horns in Giraffokeryx. Indeed, the overlap of the base of each horn core on the roof of the skull is a striking character in this genus. Thus we may visualize small ossicones develop- ing in the skin of the young Giraffokeryx, one pair above the anterior border of the frontals, and another pair over the back of the frontals. At maturity the front pair became attached to the frontal bones, but the posterior ossicones spread into long, elliptical bases that overlapped both the frontals and the parietals. The nasals terminate posteriorly at the base of the front horn cores. The frontals are very wide, and extraordinarily flat, and behind them the parietals narrow rapidly and then flare out again to form the lambdoidal crest. The great constriction of the parietals in Giraffokeryx is an indication of the small size of the brain. The parietals dip down somewhat just behind the frontals, reaching the lowest point above the paroccipital processes, and then they rise again to the lambdoidal crest, which projects far behind the occipital condyles. There are supraQrbital foramina piercing the frontals.

Load more