Ambos.Pdf (65.17Kb)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Butz Peters RAF Gegen Bundesrepublik
Butz Peters 1977 RAF gegen Bundesrepublik Besuchen Sie uns im Internet: www.droemer.de © 2017 Droemer Verlag Ein Imprint der Verlagsgruppe Droemer Knaur GmbH & Co. KG, München Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk darf – auch teilweise – nur mit Genehmigung des Verlags wiedergegeben werden. Covergestaltung: ZERO Werbeagentur, München Coverabbildung: FinePic®, München Satz: Adobe InDesign im Verlag Druck und Bindung: CPI books GmbH, Leck ISBN 978-3-426-27678-5 5 4 3 2 1 INHALT VORWORT ........................................ 11 FRÜHLING ERSTER ABSCHNITT. BUBACK ........................ 21 1. Gründonnerstag ................................ 21 2. Margarine ..................................... 25 3. Karfreitag ..................................... 38 4. Sonnenberg .................................... 43 5. Klar .......................................... 45 6. Folkerts ....................................... 55 7. Erkenntnisse ................................... 58 8. Staatsbegräbnis ................................. 61 9. Selbstbezichtigung .............................. 69 10. Singen ....................................... 81 11. Überraschungen ............................... 87 12. Becker ....................................... 95 13. Lorenz ....................................... 103 14. Heißler ....................................... 109 15. Haag ......................................... 113 16. Wüstencamp .................................. 117 17. Harz ......................................... 123 18. Überlegungen ................................ -
Balancing Security and Liberty in Germany
Balancing Security and Liberty in Germany Russell A. Miller* INTRODUCTION Scholarly discourse over America’s national security policy frequently invites comparison with Germany’s policy.1 Interest in Germany’s national security jurisprudence arises because, like the United States, Germany is a constitutional democracy. Yet, in contrast to the United States, modern Germany’s historical encounters with violent authoritarian, anti-democratic, and terrorist movements have endowed it with a wealth of constitutional experience in balancing security and liberty. The first of these historical encounters – with National Socialism – provided the legacy against which Germany’s post-World War II constitutional order is fundamentally defined.2 The second encounter – with leftist domestic radicalism in the 1970s and 1980s – required the maturing German democracy to react to domestic terrorism.3 The third encounter – the security threat posed in the * Associate Professor of Law, Washington & Lee University School of Law ([email protected]); co-Editor-in-Chief, German Law Journal (http://www.germanlaw journal.com). This essay draws on material prepared for a forthcoming publication. See DONALD P. KOMMERS & RUSSELL A. MILLER, THE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (3rd ed., forthcoming 2011). It also draws on a previously published piece. See Russell A. Miller, Comparative Law and Germany’s Militant Democracy, in US NATIONAL SECURITY, INTELLIGENCE AND DEMOCRACY 229 (Russell A. Miller ed., 2008). The essay was written during my term as a Senior Fulbright Scholar at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and Public International Law in Heidelberg, Germany. 1. See, e.g., Jacqueline E. Ross, The Place of Covert Surveillance in Democratic Societies: A Comparative Study of the United States and Germany, 55 AM. -
De Rote Armee Fraktion in Het Nederlandse Parlementaire Debat
“Zoals bekend, zijn dat gewapende overvallers, misdadigers.” Infame Misdrijven: De Rote Armee Fraktion in het Nederlandse parlementaire debat Master Scriptie, History PCNI: Political Debate Niels Holtkamp S0954055 Begeleider: Prof. Dr. H. te Velde Universiteit Leiden 01 juli 2019 [email protected] +31654938262 Kort Rapenburg 6A 2311 GC Leiden 2 1 “Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein.” - Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Böse (1886) 1 Titel naar uitspraak van Marcus Bakker (CPN), Handelingen Tweede Kamer 1973 – 1974, 4 september, 4604. ‘Infame misdrijven’ naar Theo van Schaik (KVP), Handelingen Tweede Kamer 1975 – 1976 12 februari, 2806. Afbeelding voorblad: Ton Schuetz/ANP. De ravage rond een telefooncel in Amsterdam Osdorp, waar bij een arrestatie in 1977 twee RAF leden en drie agenten gewond raakten, door vuurwapens en een handgranaat. 3 Inhoudsopgave “Zoals bekend, zijn dat gewapende overvallers, misdadigers.” .................................... 1 Afkortingen .................................................................................................................... 4 Deel 1 ............................................................................................................................. 5 De Rote Armee Fraktion en het Nederlandse parlementaire debat ................................ 6 Historiografie ............................................................................................................ -
Considering the Creation of a Domestic Intelligence Agency in the United States
HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM and the INTELLIGENCE POLICY CENTER THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Homeland Security Program RAND Intelligence Policy Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. -
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Inhaltsverzeichnis Einleitung – 7 1 Anfänge – 31 1968 und die Anfänge des linken Terrorismus – 33 Terrorismus und Avantgarde – 52 Faszinosum Militanz – 71 2 Stationen – 101 Sympathie und »Verrat« – 103 Sartre in Stammheim – 118 3 Faktoren – 147 Die RAF und die Frauen – 149 Die RAF und ihre Anwälte – 175 Die Mission mit der Waffe – 221 4 Vergangenheit – 233 Zivilisationsbruch und Gesellschaftskontinuität – 235 Die antisemitische Selektion eines bundesdeutschen Terroristen – 250 Horst Mahler und das Kontinuum der Schuldabwehr – 299 5 Beendigung – 327 Die RAF und ihre Opfer – 329 Das Ende der RAF – 345 Zur zeitgeschichtlichen Bedeutung der Justizvollzugsanstalt Stammheim (Bau 1) – 355 Anmerkungen – 379 Drucknachweise – 423 SB_98140_0002_Kraushaar_RAF.indd 5 06.11.2017 10:24:18 SB_98140_0002_Kraushaar_RAF.indd 6 06.11.2017 10:24:18 Einleitung Wer vierzig Jahre nach dem »Deutschen Herbst« des Jahres 1977 und damit nach der Geschichte der RAF fragt, nach ihrer Herausforderung wie ihrer Bewältigung, der muss sich auch umgekehrt die Frage gefal- len lassen, welche Bedeutung der damalige und 1998 nach fast dreißig Jahren beendete linke Terrorismus für die Gegenwart überhaupt noch haben soll. Worum geht es, wenn nach so langer Zeit noch einmal Verbrechen unter die Lupe genommen werden, die in manchen Fällen zwar immer noch ihrer strafrechtlichen Aufklärung harren, politisch aber längst bedeutungslos geworden sind? Oder zugespitzter gefragt: Was macht eigentlich die vom Kapitel RAF noch immer anhaltende Irritationskraft aus? Und worin sollte die Aufgabe bestehen, dieses besser als bisher zu begreifen? Spätestens seit den Terroranschlägen vom 11. September 2001 ist der Terror ja zu einer furchterregenden Konstante des politischen Le- bens geworden. Was an Schreckensmeldungen früher eher punktuell auftrat, das ist seither zu einem regelrechten Kontinuum geworden. -
Leveraging the Terrorist – Audience Relationship to Assess Evolutionary Trajectories
ABSTRACT Title of Document: TERRORISM’S COMMUNICATIVE DYNAMIC: LEVERAGING THE TERRORIST – AUDIENCE RELATIONSHIP TO ASSESS EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES. Daniel S. Gressang IV, PhD, 2009 Directed By: Professor David Lalman, Department of Government and Politics Terrorist groups do not operate in isolation. To survive in the face of counter- pressures from their opponents, the group must establish a beneficial relationship with a targeted audience, a presumed constituency, in order to generate the sympathy and support necessary for maintaining operational viability. Existing studies of terrorism, however, offer few insights into how this might be done. The most common approach revolves around assessments of terrorist messages, yet typically treats those messages as self-serving propaganda or media manipulation. This study takes a different approach, suggesting that terrorists use statements and communiqués in an effort to gain and maintain a supportive audience. Further, the intended audience for the messages infer meaning in terrorist violence, thus augmenting or reducing the impact of persuasive messaging by the terrorist. Understanding this process, in turn, may yield new insights into the dynamic processes of terrorism, offering new opportunities to assess a terrorist group’s potential for positive evolutionary growth or greater relative fitness. Using Grunig’s situational theory of publics, this study creates and evaluates a new metric, called expected affinity, for examining the terrorist group’s effort to establish and strengthen bonds between itself and its targeted and presumptively supportive audience. Expected affinity combines sub-measures addressing problem recognition, expected and desired levels of involvement, and constraint recognition, coupled with an inferred meaning in the symbolism of violent acts in order to evaluate terrorist messages and attacks. -
Der Bader-Meinhof Komplex
CONSTANTIN FILM and BERND EICHINGER present A Bernd Eichinger Production An Uli Edel Film Martina Gedeck Moritz Bleibtreu Johanna Wokalek Nadja Uhl Jan Josef Liefers Stipe Erceg Niels Bruno Schmidt Vinzenz Kiefer Simon Licht Alexandra Maria Lara Hannah Herzsprung Tom Schilling Daniel Lommatzsch Sebastian Blomberg Katharina Wackernagel with Heino Ferch and Bruno Ganz Directed by Uli Edel Written and produced by Bernd Eichinger Based on the book by and in consultation with Stefan Aust 0 Release Date: ……………………………… 1 CONTENTS Synopsis Short 04 Press Notice 04 Press Information on the Original Book 04 Facts and Figures on the Film 05 Synopsis Long 06 Chronicle of the RAF 07 Interviews Bernd Eichinger 11 Uli Edel 13 Stefan Aust 15 Martina Gedeck 17 Moritz Bleibtreu 18 Johanna Wokalek 19 Crew / Biography Bernd Eichinger 20 Uli Edel 20 Stefan Aust 21 Rainer Klausmann 21 Bernd Lepel 21 Cast / Biography Martina Gedeck 22 Moritz Bleibtreu 22 Johanna Wokalek 22 Bruno Ganz 23 Nadja Uhl 23 Jan Josef Liefers 24 Stipe Erceg 24 Niels Bruno Schmidt 24 Vinzenz Kiefer 24 Simon Licht 25 Alexandra Maria Lara 25 Hannah Herzsprung 25 Daniel Lommatzsch 25 Sebastian Blomberg 26 Heino Ferch 26 Katharina Wackernagel 26 Anna Thalbach 26 Volker Bruch 27 Hans-Werner Meyer 27 Tom Schilling 27 Thomas Thieme 27 Jasmin Tabatabai 28 Susanne Bormann 28 2 Crew 29 Cast 29 3 SYNOPSIS SHORT Germany in the 1970s: Murderous bomb attacks, the threat of terrorism and the fear of the enemy inside are rocking the very foundations of the still fragile German democracy. The radicalised children of the Nazi generation led by Andreas Baader (Moritz Bleibtreu), Ulrike Meinhof (Martina Gedeck) and Gudrun Ensslin (Johanna Wokalek) are fighting a violent war against what they perceive as the new face of fascism: American imperialism supported by the German establishment, many of whom have a Nazi past. -
Ideology and Terror in Germany
An Age of Murder: Ideology and Terror in Germany Jeffrey Herf It is best to begin with the obvious. This is a series of lectures about murder, indeed about an age of murder. Murders to be sure inspired by politi- cal ideas, but murders nevertheless. In all, the Rote Armee Fraktion (Red Army Faction, hereafter the RAF) murdered thirty-four people and would have killed more had police and intelligence agencies not arrested them or prevented them from carrying out additional “actions.” Yesterday, the papers reported that thirty-two people were killed in suicide-bomb attacks in Iraq, and thirty-four the day before, and neither of those war crimes were front-page news in the New York Times or the Washington Post. So there is an element of injustice in the amount of time and attention devoted to the thirty-four murders committed by the RAF over a period of twenty- two years and that devoted to the far more numerous victims of radical Islamist terror. Yet the fact that the murders of large numbers of people today has become horribly routine is no reason to dismiss the significance of the murders of a much smaller number for German history. Along with the murders came attempted murders, bank robberies, and explosions at a variety of West German and American institutions. The number of dead could have been much higher. If the RAF had not used pistols, machine guns, bazookas, rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), remote-controlled . This article was originally delivered as the opening lecture of the lecture series “The ‘German Autumn’ of 977: Terror, State, and Society in West Germany,” held at the German Historical Institute in Washington, DC, on Thursday, September 7, 007. -
A True Story by Emil Hakl
A true story by Emil Hakl Translated by David Short Tossing the Coffin Kájik – Party down the local on Monday, would you come? I write and click send. Wouldn’t say no, comes her reply. Who’s gonna be there? No idea. We can turn up, say hello to Mat and Chris, then we’ll see. But suppose you go and say ‘Hi Mat!’ to Chris again… Engines firing up, must go. Safe flight! As soon as we reach flight level I dig my book out of my bag. I try to get stuck in. Hanns Martin Schleyer came to the notice of the German public during the sixties and seventies thanks chiefly to his tough stand against the unions. He was born in 1915 in Offenburg. Having taken a law degree, he joined the SS in 1933 and the NSDAP four years later. There he made quite a name for himself, which saw him transferred all the way to Prague. In 1943 he landed the job of presiding over the Central Industrial Association for Bohemia and Moravia. The smooth surface of the water is glinting far below the wing’s trailing edge. Herman Melville, Karel Zeman, Jules Verne, Arthur Gordon Pym, The Black Corsair plus the diving adventures of some Russian or other (the underwater Red Army man made short work of anything he ran across down below: Hunnish torpedoes, mines, electric eels, submarines) – these had been cardinal encounters. On the other hand, I have this recurring dream – of sinking into the depths, losing first the light, then oxygen, finally my mind. -
Die RAF – Ein Deutsches Trauma?
ISBN 978-3-89289-044-7 Die RAF – ein deutsches Trauma? Die RAF – ein deutsches Trauma? • „... gegen den Terrorismus steht der Wille des gesamten Volkes.“ (Helmut Schmidt) Caroline Klausing/Verena von Wiczlinski (Hrsg.) Caroline Klausing/Verena Versuch einer historischen Deutung Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Rheinland-Pfalz Am Kronberger Hof 6 • 55116 Mainz Herausgeberinnen: Caroline Klausing und Verena von Wiczlinski Tel.: 0 61 31 - 16 29 70 • Fax: 0 61 31 - 16 29 80 in Zusammenarbeit mit der Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Rheinland-Pfalz E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.politische-bildung-rlp.de Impressum Herausgeberinnen Caroline Klausing und Verena von Wiczlinski in Zusammenarbeit mit der Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Rheinland-Pfalz Am Kronberger Hof 6 55116 Mainz Verantwortlich Bernhard Kukatzki Redaktion Marianne Rohde, Marita Hoffmann Lektorat Marita Hoffmann Umschlaggestaltung Birgit Elm und Llux Agentur & Verlag Abbildungsnachweis Alle Fotografien außer auf Seite 71 und 83: Dr. Andreas Linsenmann Fotografien auf Seite 71 und 83: Jan Hildner Gesamtherstellung Llux Agentur & Verlag e.K. 67065 Ludwigshafen www.buecher.llux.de Mainz 2018 ISBN 978-3-89289-044-7 Die RAF – ein deutsches Trauma? Versuch einer historischen Deutung Inhalt Vorwort 4 Bernhard Kukatzki und Marianne Rohde Zur Einführung 6 Die RAF als gesamtgesellschaftliche Herausforderung – Akteure, Institutionen und Kontroversen Caroline Klausing und Verena von Wiczlinski Der Staat 14 Staat und Terrorismus in der Bundesrepublik -
Rsterrorists on TRIAL
Alex P. Schmid | Alex P. Beatrice de Graaf Terrorism trials are an exceptional opportunity for better understanding and, hence, countering terrorism, since they are often the only place where most if not all of the actors of a terrorist incident meet again, and where the media report and broadcast their respective accounts. A nexus between terrorist violence, law enforcement and public opinion, terrorism trials showcase justice in progress and thus demonstrate to the world how terrorism suspects are treated under national law. editors This volume views terrorism trials as a form of theatre, where the “show” that a trial may offer can develop often unexpected dynamics, which at times might inconvenience the government. Seeing terrorism trials as a stage where legal instruments are used (and abused) to argue ON TRIAL TERRORISTS the validity of contested political constructs, this study presents a performative perspective to draw attention to the mechanisms and effects of terrorism trials in and outside the courtroom. With a special focus on how the power of these performances may in turn shape new narratives of justice and/or injustice, it offers vital insights into terrorism trials directed involving different types of terrorism suspects, from left-wing to ethno-nationalist and jihadist terrorists, in Spain, Russia, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. Beatrice de Graaf holds a chair in the History of International Relations & Global Governance at Utrecht University. She was co-founder of the Centre for Terrorism and Counterterrorism at Leiden University, TERRORISTS publishes on security-related themes and is currently working on secu- rity in the nineteenth century for an ERC Project SECURE. -
Terrorism As Discourse
DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „The multi-causal and asynchronous development of terrorism laws in Germany from the 1970’s to the present” Verfasser Mag. iur. Clemens Kaupa angestrebter akademischer Grad Magister der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, im Dezember 2009 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 312 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Geschichte Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Mag. DDr. Oliver Rathkolb Content Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Terrorism as discourse ............................................................................................................... 6 Terrorism discourse: the case of SDS .................................................................................... 7 Terrorism discourse: sympathizers....................................................................................... 11 Terrorism laws in Germany enacted during the RAF period................................................... 16 Kronzeugenregelung – the leniency law .............................................................................. 16 Conclusion........................................................................................................................ 23 Lauschangriff – the wiretapping program............................................................................ 24 Conclusion........................................................................................................................ 32 Rasterfahndung....................................................................................................................