DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizenship in Medieval Ioannina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Citizenship in historical perspective / edited by Steven G. Ellis, Guðmundur Hálfdanarson and Ann Katherine Isaacs (Transversal theme ; 1) 323.6 (21.) 1. Cittadinanza 2. Individuo e società I. Ellis, Steven II. Hálfdanarson, Guðmundur III. Isaacs, Ann Katherine CIP a cura del Sistema bibliotecario dell’Università di Pisa This volume is published thanks to the support of the Directorate General for Research of the European Commission, by the Sixth Framework Network of Excellence CLIOHRES.net under the contract CIT3-CT-2005-006164. The volume is solely the responsibility of the Network and the authors; the European Community cannot be held responsible for its contents or for any use which may be made of it. Volumes published (2006) I. Thematic Work Groups I. Public Power in Europe: Studies in Historical Transformations II. Power and Culture: Hegemony, Interaction and Dissent III. Religion, Ritual and Mythology. Aspects of Identity Formation in Europe IV. Professions and Social Identity. New European Historical Research on Work, Gender and Society V. Frontiers and Identities: Exploring the Research Area VI. Europe and the World in European Historiography II. Transversal Theme I. Citizenship in Historical Perspective III. Doctoral Dissertations I. F. Peyrou, La Comunidad de Ciudadanos. El Discurso Democrático-Republicano en España, 1840-1868 Cover: Ambrogio Lorenzetti (1285-1348 ca.), The Effects of Good Government in the City and the Countryside, fresco (central part), Palazzo Pubblico, Siena. © 1990. Photo Scala, Florence. © Copyright 2006 by Edizioni Plus – Pisa University Press Lungarno Pacinotti, 43 56126 Pisa Tel. 050 2212056 – Fax 050 2212945 [email protected] www.edizioniplus.it - Section “Biblioteca” ISBN 88-8492-406-5 Manager Claudia Napolitano Editing Francesca Petrucci Informatic assistance Michele Gasparello Citizenship in Medieval Ioannina Brendan Osswald University of Toulouse II - Le Mirail Ioannina est devenue après la chute de l’Empire byzantin en 1204 une des principales villes de l’Etat byzantin d’Epire, avant de devenir quasiment indépendante de 1319 à 1430, date de la conquête ottomane. Le problème de la citoyenneté s’y est posé avec acuité, dans la mesure où elle a d’une part continuellement été confrontée au problème des migrations, qu’il s’agisse de populations allogènes ou de réfugiés grecs, et où d’autre part son autonomie politique a posé le problème de la prise de décisions. La tradition byzantine d’avant 1204 était très accueillante envers les allogènes soucieux de s’intégrer à la communauté byzantine orthodoxe. Ioannina poursuivit cette politique, à la notable exception des Albanais qui, en raison de leur nombre, de leurs différences culturelles et de l’ambition de leurs chefs, furent constamment refoulés. En revanche, la pression albanaise conduisit la ville à inviter des princes étrangers à la gouverner en tant que Despotes, afin qu’ils apportent avec eux une aide militaire et diplomatique. C’est ainsi qu’un prince serbe et trois princes italiens régnèrent sur elle de 1367 à 1430. Chacun de ces princes amena avec lui des troupes ainsi que des courtisans allogènes. Un certain nombre de nouveaux venus, Grecs ou allogènes, ont ainsi pu jouer un rôle politique majeur à Ioannina. Le pouvoir dans la ville était réparti entre plusieurs catégories de citoyens: la catégorie supé- rieure, celle des archontes constituait le Sénat. Le peuple pouvait occasionnellement se réunir en assemblée, mais cette assemblée entérinait en général les décisions des archontes. Enfin, la catégorie des καστρηνοί est mal définie: il s’agissait à l’origine du nom donné aux habitants du κάστρον, mais on suppose que le terme prit un sens social et devint héréditaire, les habitants supposés originels se démarquant ainsi des nouveaux venus. Nos sources sont malheureusement peu loquaces et ne nous permettent pas de savoir précisé- ment quel était contexte juridique de la citoyenneté, ni même si un règlement précis l’enca- drait. Le plus probable est que les circonstances troublées ont conduit le Despote et les habi- tants de Ioannina à agir de façon pragmatique, voire arbitraire. Ioannina was a small Byzantine city until the Fourth Crusade, which provoked the col- lapse of the Byzantine Empire, replaced by a Latin Empire in Constantinople and three Greek rival empires in Nicaea, Trebizond and Epirus1. A large number of refugees fleeing from the Latin invaders came to Epirus2. Arta was then the official capital of Epirus, but Ioannina, which was a really small and insignificant city until 1204, quickly became as important as Arta and then, after the Turkish conquest, officially became the capital of Epirus – a status it still has today. Frontiers and Identities 98 Brendan Osswald We chose Ioannina as the topic of this case study regarding citizenship for two main rea- sons. First, foreigners played a particularly strong role in the city during the late Middle Ages. Second, the history of the city is relatively well-known, especially when compared to Arta, the other main city of Epirus, thanks to two Greek Chronicles written in Ioan- nina, which give us a rich and vivid account of the historical events of these times, even if they unfortunately do not provide answers to all of our questions. These are theChronicle of Ioannina, useful for the events between 1341 and 1400, and the Chronicle of the Tocco, useful for the events between 1375 and 14223. We will make this study along two lines, looking first at the differences between local people and newcomers and, second, at dif- ferences between the classes of citizens. LOCALS AND NEWCOMERS The Byzantine Empire indeed preserved its Roman heritage accepting Caracalla’s Edict of 212 a.D., and so citizenship was not the exclusive property of an ethnic or geograph- ic group: all free men were citizens, so political rights were not the exclusive preserve of Greeks. Membership in the Byzantine élite was open to the other ethnic groups of the empire, and even to foreigners, although how the process of integration and naturalisation came about is still quite unclear4. As a matter of fact, throughout its long history, the abso- lute monarchy that was the Byzantine Empire needed the demographic and military sup- port of newcomers, and since there was no participation of the middle class in the upper levels of politics, there was no opposition to the extension of the number of citizens. So, the one and only necessary and sufficient requirement to become a fully-integrated Byzantine citizen after the 6th century was to be an Orthodox Christian, a member of the Christian society that the Empire represented, a terrestrial image of the Kingdom of Heaven. The Fourth Crusade and the subsequent events forced the contemporary inhabitants of Ioannina to pose some questions: if Epirus is cut off from the rest of the Empire, what does Roman5 citizenship mean, and since the city is peopled by a large number of refu- gees, how should they be considered? It is difficult to know what ethnic characteristics the refugees of 1204 possessed. Most of them were probably Greek, since the Crusaders invaded areas largely peopled by Greeks, but the very fact that our sources do not men- tion their ethnicity but only their religion shows that they were still catalogued according to the classical Byzantine frame of mind. The first rulers of Epirus aimed at restoring the Byzantine Empire, so the refugees were granted the right to settle and to benefit from full citizenship. Michael Comnenos, founder of the State of Epirus, invited them and gave them space to settle inside the city of Ioannina. This decision had ideological aims, since Michael wanted to be seen as a rescuer of the Byzantine people6; but there were also political, economical and military aims, as he hoped it would help him organize his State and strengthen his army. Since his power was strong, his decision was effective. But not all of the original inhabitants of Ioannina liked this policy and when Michael’s brother Theodore was defeated and captured by the Bulgarians in 1230, the inhabitants tried to expel the refugees7. Unfortunately, we do not know what happened then but the expul- sion probably never was completed, because Michael’s son, Michael II, took power and tried to follow the same general policy as his father, to whose memory he was very def- Citizenship in Medieval Ioannina 99 erential. This crisis also showed the difference between the will of the State and the will of the city. The situation was about to become more complicated with the collapse of all the centralized political authorities in the Balkans and the greater autonomy of the city of Ioannina. In 1261 the Empire of Nicaea took Constantinople back and restored the Byzantine Em- pire in its capital. This restoration did not make Epirus offer loyalty to the new Emperor, Michael Palaeologos, and the fragmentation of the former Byzantine space continued. When the Italian dynasty of the Orsini launched a coup, killed the last prince of the Com- nenos dynasty and took power in Epirus, the city of Ioannina rallied behind the Byzan- tine Empire, and in 1319 and 1321 it received two chrysobulls (a kind of privilege) from the Emperor Andronicus II that gave it substantial autonomy8. It must be noted that Jews were granted the same privileges as the other inhabitants of Ioannina, and that they were perhaps living inside the walls of the city9. At the same time, the city was supposed to refuse to be led by a foreigner to the Empire, and landlords were supposed to refuse to sell their properties to foreigners. But later, in the 1340s, the Serbian and Albanian invasions brought about the collapse of Byzantine domination in the Balkans, and made these deci- sions of no consequence. None of the invaders put the city under its yoke, so that Ioan- nina became a kind of independent City-State comparable to the Italian ones, but the city was too weak to remain isolated from foreigners.
Recommended publications
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca

    Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca

    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
  • Orientalia Christiana Periodica

    Orientalia Christiana Periodica

    Wolumen 81 Fasciculus I 2015 ORIENTALIA CHRISTIANA PERIODICA COMMENTARII DE RE ORIENTALIAETATIS CHRISTIANAE SACRA ET PROFANA EDITI CURA ET OPERE PONTIFICII INSTITUTI ORIENTALIUM STUDIORUM PONTIFICIUM INSTITUTUM ORIENTALIUM STUDIORUM PIAZZA S. MARIA MAGGIORE, 7 ROMA Nr. 1 / 2015 Poste Italiane s.p.a. Spedizione in abbonamento postale. D L. 353/2003 (conv. in L. 27/02/2004 n' 46) art. l.comma 2, DCB Roma. Semestrale. Taxe perIue. ORIENTALIA CHRISTIANA PERIODICA Piazza S. Maria Maggiore 7 — 00185 Roma www.orientaliachristiana.it tel. 0644741-7104; fax 06446-5576 ISSN 0030-5375 This periodical began publication in 1935. Two fascicles are issued each year, which contain articles, shorter notes and book reviews about the Christian East, that is, whatever concems the theology, history, patro- logy, liturgy, archaeology and canon law of the Christian East, or whatever is closely connected therewith. The annual contribution is € 46,00 in Italy, and € 58,00 or USD 76,00 outside Italy. The entire series is still in print and can be supplied on demand. Subscription should be paid by a check to Edizioni Orientalia Christia¬ na or a deposit to ccp. 34269001. International Bank Account Number (IBAN): Country Check Digit C1N Cod. ABI CAB Account Number IT 54 C 07601 03200 000034269001 BIC-CodI BPPIITRRXXX Edited by Philippe Luisier (Editor), Rafa² Zarzeczny (Book Reviews) e-mail: [email protected]; Jaros²aw Dziewicki (Managing Editor) e-mail: [email protected], with the Professors of the Pontifical Oriental Institute. Ali materials for publication (articles, notes, books for review) should be addressed to the Editor. SUMMARIUM ARTICULI Sameh Farouk Soliman, Some hymns attributed to Saint John of Damascus present in the Coptic liturgy.
  • UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Descending from the Throne: Byzantine Bishops, Ritual and Spaces of Authority Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5q80k7ct Author Rose, Justin Richard Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Descending from the Throne: Byzantine Bishops, Ritual and Spaces of Authority A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Religious Studies by Justin Richard Rose December 2017 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michael Alexander, Co-Chairperson Dr. Sherri Franks Johnson, Co-Chairperson Dr. Sharon E. J. Gerstel Dr. Muhammad Ali Copyright by Justin Richard Rose 2017 The Dissertation of Justin Richard Rose is approved: Committee Co-Chairperson ____________________________________________________________ Committee Co-Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements Before all else, I give thanks to Almighty God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Here on earth, I am grateful to my mother, friends and parishioners who have encouraged and supported me throughout this last round of graduate study. And, yes, Mother, this is the last round of graduate study. My experience at the University of California Riverside has been extraordinary. I am especially grateful to Dr. Sherri Franks Johnson for her support and guidance over the last six years. Sherri made my qualifying exam defense a truly positive experience. I am grateful for her continued support even after leaving the UCR faculty for Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge. Thanks to the Religious Studies department for the opportunities I have had during my academic study.
  • Locals Vs Foreigners : Criteria for the Formation of Local Identities in Late

    Locals Vs Foreigners : Criteria for the Formation of Local Identities in Late

    Locals vs “foreigners”: criteria for the formation of local identities in Late Byzantium. An approach to Modern Graecitas through Late Byzantine writers by Eleonora Kountoura-Galaki and Nike Koutrakou Late Byzantine writers reporting on movements of people throughout the Byzantine space and beyond during an age of decline for Byzantium, frequently referred to the provenance of their dramatis personae. Presenting us with elements relating to the identity of their heroes, the writers often stressed the group, community, alliance or alignment to which their heroes belonged, or were perceived to belong. What is of interest is how precisely they chose to do that, what dimension or criterion they specifically chose to convey to their readership. This is why we focus in this paper not on what Late Byzantines writers considered themselves to be, but on the basis of what elements they arrived at that result. The most concrete relevant criteria and corresponding technical terms used in order to define individuals and groups are given by Constantine Acropolites. The writer gives us a very representative example of how writers of the period perceived differentiation and distinguishing features in people. He focuses on four elements that set groups of people “completely apart” and constitute group identities. These elements, arranged rather hierarchically, are: language, origins/race, laws and habits1. Acropolites might have been influenced by the relevant platonic ideas that were being studied widely at his time2. Nevertheless, he offers a list of differentiation criteria which we will follow as a kind of “Ariadne’s clue” in this study. The identity differentiation elements and relevant terms as appearing in historical writing have been studied by contemporary scholars.
  • Why Macedonia Matters

    Why Macedonia Matters

    AHIF P O L I C Y J O U R N A L Winter 2012-13 Why Macedonia Matters Panayiotis Diamadis With the formation of the Former Yugoslavian n Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) in 1991, there has been a systematic effort to undermine the legitimate rights of the Greek state, particularly of Hellenes in the Greek Province of Macedonia. Selectivity, omission, and distortions of the past by FYROM have become routine. This extensive campaign of disinformation is aimed at undermining the legitimacy of the present borders. Motivating the arguments about history, language, culture, religion, identity and heritage is a struggle for control of the strip of territory between the Aemos (Balkan) Mountain range and the Aegean Sea, the land of Macedonia. Since earliest antiquity, the people to the north of the mountains have sought control over the fertile plains, strategic ports and mineral resources of Macedonia. In the twenty-first century, this continues to be the case. Despite FYROM’s endeavors to present the Macedonian issue as being about human rights, it is about territory and power. While Greece and Bulgaria have somewhat resolved their differences over access to the Aegean Sea through the framework of the European Union, land-locked FYROM has resisted all efforts to reach similar accommodation with any of its neighbors. The Macedonian issue, therefore, is not just a bilateral problem between Greece and FYROM. Bulgaria is just as concerned about the policies of governments in Skopje that endeavor to falsify the historical record and de facto challenge its established borders as well as those of Greece.
  • The Urban Continuity and Size of Late Byzantine Thessalonike

    The Urban Continuity and Size of Late Byzantine Thessalonike

    The Urban Continuity and Size of Late Byzantine Thessalonike CHARALAMBOS BAKIRTZIS I hessalonike was founded by synoikismos (gathering together the populations of the sur- Trounding towns in one site) in 316/315 B.C.by Cassander, in the innermost recess of the Thermaic Gulf, between the sea and the foothills of Mount Chortiates (ancient Kissos), a strategic location then as now (Fig. 1).1 Although the city always had a busy port, which served the Balkan peninsula as a link with the Aegean and the Mediterranean, the sea was never its sole productive area.2 Thessalonike always looked to its hinterland and the routes leading to it. To the west of the city lay the plain of Thessalonike, to the north the Myg- donian basin, and to the east and southeast an area of Chalkidike known since 1003 as Kalamaria.3 In the mid-fourteenth century, Thessalonike’s productive and commercial hinterland was delineated by the castles, built in 1341 by Andronikos III, of Chrysoupolis (Amphipo- lis) at the mouth of the Strymon, Siderokastron north of Serres, and Gynaikokastron southwest of Kilkis overlooking the lower Axios valley.4 Coins of Anna of Savoy, empress of Thessalonike (1354–65), and of John V minted in Thessalonike are not found beyond Drama, Serres, and Pella, being of local interest only.5 1 A. E. Vakalopoulos, A History of Thessaloniki (Thessalonike, 1972) and idem, ÔIstoriva th'" Qessalonivkh", 316 p.C.–1983 (Thessalonike, 1983). See also Queen of the Worthy: Thessaloniki, History and Culture, collected studies edited by I. Hassiotis (Thessalonike, 1997). A. E.
  • Reinventing Roman Ethnicity in High and Late Medieval Byzantium

    Reinventing Roman Ethnicity in High and Late Medieval Byzantium

    Reinventing Roman Ethnicity in High and Late Medieval Byzantium Yannis Stouraitis* This paper seeks to position the Byzantine paradigm within the broader discussion of identity, ethnicity and nationhood before Modernity. In about the last decade, there has been a revived interest in research into collective identity in Byzantine society, with a number of new publica- tions providing various arguments about the ethno-cultural or national character of Byzantine Romanness as well as its relationship to Hellenic identity. Contrary to an evident tendency in research thus far to relate Byzantine, i.e. medieval Roman, identity to a dominant essence – be it ethnic Hellenism, Chalcedonian orthodoxy or Roman republicanism – the approach adopt- ed here aims to divert attention to the various contents and the changing forms of Byzantine Romanness as well as to its function as a dominant mode of collective identification in the medieval Empire of Constantinople. The main thesis of the paper is that the development of Roman identity in the East after the turning point of the seventh century and up to the final sack of Constantinople by the Ottomans in 1453 needs to be examined as one of the most fas- cinating cases of transformation of a pre-modern social order’s collective identity discourse, one which culminated in an extensive reconstruction of the narrative of the community’s his- torical origins by the educated élite. Last but not least, the problematization of the function of Romanness as an ethnicity in the Byzantine case offers an interesting example for comparison in regards to the debated role of ethnicity as a factor of political loyalty in the pre-modern era.
  • Conference Program and Abstracts

    Conference Program and Abstracts

    2013 Byzantine Studies Conference Yale University, New Haven, CT Meetings at the Byzantine Studies Conference will take place in the following rooms: Linsly-Chittenden Hall, 63 High Street Sudler Hall, 100 Wall Street (inside Harkness Hall) Sheffield-Sterling-Strathcona, 1 Prospect Street (corner of Grove and Prospect Streets) President's Room, 2nd floor of the Memorial Hall, (diagonally opposite Sheffield-Sterling- Strathcona) College and Grove Streets Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, 121 Wall Street Thursday, October 31, 2013 4:30 - 6:30 P.M. Registration, Reception, and Manuscript Display Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library 4:30pm – 5:30 P.M. Exhibition of Byzantine manuscripts at the Beinecke – hosted by Roland Betancourt, Magdalene Breidenthal, Robert Nelson and Nicole Paxton Sullo (Note: this is the only time that these manuscripts, including new acquisitions, will be on display) Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Room 38/39 5:00pm – 6:30 P.M. Welcome Reception Mezzanine level, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library Friday, November 1, 2013 8:00 A.M. – Welcome Location: Sudler Hall Martin Jean, Director, Institute of Sacred Music, Yale University Robert Nelson, Yale University 8:30 – 10:45 A.M. – Session 1 1A Between Worlds: Caucasia at the End of Antiquity Chair: Walter Kaegi, University of Chicago Location: Linsly-Chittenden Hall 102 “Topographies of Power and Memory in Late Antique Armenia” Matthew Canepa, University of Minnesota “The Syrian Fathers in Georgia: Ethnicities and Christologies” Paul Crego, Library of Congress “The Excavations and Reconstruction Theories of Zuart’noc’ (c. 641-c.661)” Christina Maranci, Tufts University 1 “’You Shall Again Receive From Us Your Outstanding Positions of Honor:’ The Caucasian Aristocracies in Sasanian Armies, 220-651 CE” Scott McDonough, William Paterson University “The Parthian Contribution to Caucasia’s Christianization” Stephen H.
  • Στους Γονείς Μου, ∆Ήµητρα Και Κωνσταντίνο to My Parents

    Στους Γονείς Μου, ∆Ήµητρα Και Κωνσταντίνο to My Parents

    Στους γονείς µου, ∆ήµητρα και Κωνσταντίνο To my parents, Demetra and Constantinos THE OTTOMAN CONQUEST OF THRACE ASPECTS OF HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY BY GEORGIOS C. LIAKOPOULOS THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS ANS SOCIAL SCIENCES OF BİLKENT UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY ANKARA, SEPTEMBER 2002 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master in History Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık Thesis supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master in History Dr. Eugenia Kermeli Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master in History Associate Professor Dr. Mehmet Öz Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Kürşat Aydoğan Director ABSTRACT In my thesis I examine Thrace as a geographical unity during the Ottoman conquest in the fourteenth century. In the first chapter I present the sources that I used, Byzantine and Ottoman. The life and works of the chronographers are discussed to the extent that they assist us in comprehending their ideology and mentality. I focus on the contemporary sources of the fourteenth century. The second chapter treats with the diplomatic relations between the Byzantines and the Turks in the fourteenth century before and after the Turkish settlement in Thrace.
  • Land and Privilege in Byzantium: the Institution of Pronoia Mark C

    Land and Privilege in Byzantium: the Institution of Pronoia Mark C

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00962-2 - Land and Privilege in Byzantium: The Institution of Pronoia Mark C. Bartusis Frontmatter More information Land and Privilege in Byzantium A pronoia was a type of conditional grant from the emperor, often to soldiers, of various properties and privileges. In large measure the institution of pronoia characterized social and economic relations in later Byzantium, and its study is the study of later Byzantium. Fill- ing the need for a comprehensive study of the institution, this book examines the origin, evolution, and characteristics of pronoia, focus- ing particularly on the later thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. But the book is much more than a study of a single institution. With a broad chronological scope extending from the mid-tenth to the mid- fifteenth century, it incorporates the latest understanding of Byzantine agrarian relations, taxation, administration, and the economy, as it deals with relations between the emperor, monastic and lay landhold- ers, including soldiers and peasants. Particular attention is paid to the relation between the pronoia and western European, Slavic, and Middle Eastern institutions, especially the Ottoman timar. mark c. bartusis is Professor of History at Northern State Univer- sity. He is an expert in later Byzantine political, social, and military history and author of The Late Byzantine Army: Arms and Society, 1204–1453. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00962-2 - Land and Privilege in Byzantium: The Institution of Pronoia Mark C. Bartusis Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00962-2 - Land and Privilege in Byzantium: The Institution of Pronoia Mark C.
  • Niketas Choniates

    Niketas Choniates

    GUIDE TO BYZANTINE HISTORICAL WRITING This handy reference guide makes it easier to access and understand histories written in Greek between 600 and 1480 CE. Covering classi• cizing histories that continued ancient Greek traditions of historiog• raphy, sweeping, fast-paced "chronicle"-type histories, and dozens of idiosyncratic historical texts, it distills the results of complex, multilin• gual, specialist scholarship into clear explanations of the basic infor• mation needed to approach each medieval Greek history. It provides a sound basis for further research on each text by describing what we know about the time of composition, content covered by the history, authorship, extant manuscripts, previous editions and translations, and basic bibliography. Even-handed explanations of scholarly debates give readers the information they need to assess controversies independently. A comprehensive introduction orients students and nonspecialists to the traditions and methods of Byzantine historical writing. It will prove an invaluable timesaver for Byzantinists and an essential gateway for classicists, western medievalists, and students. LEONORA NEVILLE is a historian of Byzantine culture and society. Her work on Byzantine historical writing has dealt with how Byzantine authors interacted with classical models of history writing and culture and tried to shape contemporary opinion by writing history. She is the author of Anna Komnene: The Life and Work of a Medieval Historian (2016), Heroes and Romans in Twelfih- Century Byzantium: The Material for History of Nikephoros Bryennios (Cambridge University Press, 2012), and Authority in Byzantine Provincial Society: p$o—lloo (Cambridge University Press, 2004). She is Vilas Distinguished Achievement Professor and the John W. and Jeanne M.
  • The Career of Euthymios Malakes Hannah Ewing Rollins College, Hewing@Rollins.Edu

    The Career of Euthymios Malakes Hannah Ewing Rollins College, [email protected]

    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online Faculty Publications 4-2018 Occupying and Transcending a Provincial See: The Career of Euthymios Malakes Hannah Ewing Rollins College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.rollins.edu/as_facpub Part of the Byzantine and Modern Greek Commons Published In Hannah Ewing, “Occupying and Transcending a Provincial See: The aC reer of Euthymios Malakes,” Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 42:1 (April 2018): 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/byz.2017.36 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Occupying and Transcending a Provincial See: The Career of Euthymios Malakes Hannah Ewing Rollins College [email protected] Abstract: Despite a distinguished reputation as an orator and bishop in his own time, comparatively little scholarship focuses upon Euthymios Malakes, metropolitan of Neopatras during the later twelfth century. Using his extant works and contemporary sources, this article reconstructs elements of Malakes’ career in both Constantinople and Hellas. He was active in each, balancing his intellectual credentials, participation in synods, and elite connections to the capital with immersion in more local contests. This combination allowed him to expand his pursuits and reputation beyond his minor see, into both the capital and elsewhere in the province. Keywords: Euthymios Malakes; metropolitans; twelfth century; Neopatras; Hellas and Peloponnesos; Constantinople Twelfth-century provincial bishops feature prominently in studies of Byzantium. These men shed light on broad administrative, ecclesiastical, and cultural issues of their day, while also serving as key witnesses to specific emperors, controversies, markets, networks, and literary communities.