DOCSLIB.ORG

Tender to Be Returned To: the City of Greater Sudbury , C/O Purchasing 200 Brady Street, 2Nd Floor, Tom Davies Square Sudbury, on P3A 5P3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tender to Be Returned To: the City of Greater Sudbury , C/O Purchasing 200 Brady Street, 2Nd Floor, Tom Davies Square Sudbury, on P3A 5P3 The City of Greater Sudbury Contract ISD16-222 Request for Proposal for Junction Creek Sub-Watershed Study and Stormwater Master Plan Issued by the Purchasing Section Finance Division on behalf of Roads and Transportation Section Infrastructure Services Department Valeria Kandiral Chief Procurement Officer Issued: September 7, 2016 Cost for Document Pick-up: $28.25 ($25.00 plus HST) 1 of 71 Contract ISD16-222, Request For Proposal for Junction Creek Sub-Watershed Study and Stormwater Master Plan Table of Contents 1 Part 1 – Introduction .......................................................................................... 7 1.1 Description of Goods, Services and/or Construction Being Procured .................. 7 1.2 Term / Schedule / Delivery ................................................................................ 7 1.3 Prequalification ................................................................................................... 7 2 Part 2 – Information for Proponents .................................................................. 7 2.1 Closing Date and Opening of Proposals ............................................................. 7 2.2 Information Meeting ........................................................................................... 8 2.3 Evaluation of Proposals ...................................................................................... 8 2.4 Communications and Official Point of Contact .................................................... 8 2.5 Addendum and Notice ........................................................................................ 9 2.6 Errors and Omissions ....................................................................................... 10 2.7 Quantities ......................................................................................................... 10 2.8 Clarification of Proposals Following Bid Close ................................................... 10 2.9 Irrevocability of Proposals ................................................................................ 10 2.10 Validity of Proposals ......................................................................................... 10 2.11 Reserved Rights ............................................................................................... 11 2.12 Disqualification of Proponents .......................................................................... 11 2.13 Award ............................................................................................................... 12 2.14 (Removed Intentionally) ................................................................................... 12 2.15 Amounts All Inclusive ....................................................................................... 12 2.16 Taxes, Duties and Freight ................................................................................ 12 2.17 Substitutions .................................................................................................... 13 2 of 71 Contract ISD16-222, Request For Proposal for Junction Creek Sub-Watershed Study and Stormwater Master Plan 2.18 Materials/Equipment ........................................................................................ 13 2.19 Costs Incurred By Proponents .......................................................................... 13 2.20 Withdrawal of Proposals ................................................................................... 14 2.21 Limit on Liability ............................................................................................... 14 2.22 Debriefing......................................................................................................... 14 2.23 Anti-Idling ........................................................................................................ 14 2.24 (Intentionally Removed) ................................................................................... 14 2.25 Application of Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act 15 2.26 Conflict of Interest ........................................................................................... 15 2.27 [Removed Intentionally] ................................................................................... 15 3 Part 3 – Submission Requirements ................................................................... 15 3.1 Submission Requirements ................................................................................ 15 4 Part 4 – Terms and Conditions ......................................................................... 16 4.1 Contract ........................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Payment Terms ................................................................................................ 16 4.3 Permits, Licences and Approvals ...................................................................... 17 4.4 Exclusivity Clause ............................................................................................. 17 4.5 Cancellation/Suspension/Termination .............................................................. 17 4.6 (Removed Intentionally) ................................................................................... 18 4.7 Workplace Safety and Insurance Board ........................................................... 18 4.8 Insurance ......................................................................................................... 18 4.9 Indemnification ................................................................................................ 19 4.10 Set-Off.............................................................................................................. 20 4.11 Ownership of Deliverables ................................................................................ 20 3 of 71 Contract ISD16-222, Request For Proposal for Junction Creek Sub-Watershed Study and Stormwater Master Plan 4.12 Salvage Goods .................................................................................................. 20 4.13 Confidentiality .................................................................................................. 20 4.14 Accessibility ...................................................................................................... 20 4.15 Applicable Law ................................................................................................. 21 4.16 Assignment....................................................................................................... 21 4.17 Occupational Health and Safety ....................................................................... 21 5 Part 5 – Definitions and Interpretation ............................................................. 23 5.1 Definitions ........................................................................................................ 23 5.2 Interpretation ................................................................................................... 23 6 Part 6 – Schedules ........................................................................................... 23 1.1 Schedule 1 ....................................................................................................... 24 1.2 Schedule 2 ....................................................................................................... 28 Schedule 3 .................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 3 2 Technical Advisory Committee ........................................................................... 4 3 Public Consultation ............................................................................................. 4 3.1 Public Meeting and Open Houses ....................................................................... 4 3.2 Communications Consultant ............................................................................... 5 4 Existing Conditions Characterization................................................................... 6 4.1 Existing Information Review and Data Collection ............................................... 6 4.1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1.2 Rainfall and Flow Data ........................................................................................................... 7 4.1.3 Natural Heritage System ........................................................................................................ 8 4.1.4 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................... 9 4.1.5 Land Use and Planning ......................................................................................................... 10 4 of 71 Contract ISD16-222, Request For Proposal for Junction Creek Sub-Watershed Study and Stormwater Master Plan 4.1.6 Hydraulic / Hydrologic Modelling and Flood Plain Mapping ............................................ 10 4.1.7 Hydrogeology ......................................................................................................................... 11 4.1.8 Channel Erosion and Stream Channel Morphology .......................................................... 11 4.1.9 Topographical Survey
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Struck Off 2019 International Business Companies Registry of Belize
    International Business Companies Registry of Belize Struck Off 2019 IBC Number IBC Name 404 Management Services Limited 660 Central American Marketing Associates Inc. 713 Morimor Holding Ltd. 1,834 Diamond Investments Ltd. 1,936 The Weston Bird Trust, Inc. 2,220 Roma Intercambio S.A. 2,445 Belize.Com Ltd. 2,447 Pishon Trust Management Limited 2,628 B.F.D. Limited 3,371 Bartin Management Corp. 3,413 Loury Investment S.A. 3,594 Bordes Investments Corp. 3,826 Professional Management Ltd. 4,049 Vernon Management Corp. 4,770 Greenfield Group Limited 5,261 International Fitness Federation Inc. 5,474 Efl Inc. 6,266 Maxwinn Co., Ltd. 6,293 Zalls Enterprises Inc. 6,373 Prosperous Consultants Ltd. 6,423 Queensway Trading Corporation 6,637 Sun King International Limited 7,052 Transcom International Inc. 7,137 Universal Shipping Services Ltd. 7,385 Donnybrook Company Limited 7,562 Nabos Overseas Inc. 7,604 Spartan Management Limited 7,763 Victory Co., Ltd. 7,925 The Marginal Ltd. 8,120 Auspice International Ltd. 8,178 Aremac Co., Ltd. 8,218 Talents Consolidated, Inc. 8,251 Sanlin Enterprises Ltd. 8,366 New World Consultants Limited 8,519 P. Leasing Corporation Limited 8,825 Amazing Energy Industrial Co., Ltd. 9,444 Munogenics, Inc. 9,580 Fortrose Marketing Inc. 9,711 Ppe Industrial Corp. 10,741 Worldwide Telecom Holdings, Inc. 10,785 Castle Group Management Ltd. 10,874 Jeng Well Int'L Co., Ltd. 11,492 Atlax Ventures Limited 11,992 Killan Enterprises Inc. 12,685 Crosten Marketing Ltd. 12,775 Adeward Holding S.A. 12,801 Induha Industrie-Service S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Saskatchewan's Mining Supply Chain
    Saskatchewan Mining Supply Chain First in Canada and top ten in the world for mining investment the past six of seven years. Fraser Institute, Survey of Mining Companies 2019 Our Mining Industry Saskatchewan mineral sales totalled $7.9 billion in In addition, the province has deposits of copper, zinc, 2019. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) estimates that nickel, rare earth minerals and platinum group metals Saskatchewan accounted for 14% of national sales value, third as well as various industrial minerals including sodium highest in Canada. sulphate and salt. The province is the largest potash producer in the world, Major Mining Companies Operating in Saskatchewan accounting for approximately one-third of total production • Nutrien in 2019, and hosting over half of the globe’s potash reserves. • Mosaic Company Saskatchewan is also one of the world’s largest producers of uranium, with the Athabasca Basin containing the largest • BHP Billiton Canada Inc. high-grade uranium deposits in the world. • K+S Potash Canada Saskatchewan is Canada’s third-largest producer of coal, • ORANO Canada producing an average of 10 million tonnes per year. • Cameco The province is also home to one of the world’s largest fields • Vale Limited of diamond-bearing kimberlite. This discovery has led to • Rio Tinto extensive exploration and evaluation. • Acron Saskatchewan has large underexplored areas with high gold potential. The Seabee Operation produced 112,137 ounces • Yancoal of gold in 2019, a record annual production up 17% for the previous year. saskatchewan.ca/invest
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2016 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 20-F ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2015 Commission file number: 001-15030 VALE S.A. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Federative Republic of Brazil (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) Luciano Siani Pires, Chief Financial Officer phone: +55 21 3814 8888 fax: +55 21 3814 8820 Avenida das Am´ericas, 700 – Bloco 8 – Loja 318 22640-100 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil (Address of principal executive offices) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of Each Exchange on Title of Each Class Which Registered Preferred class A shares of Vale, no par value per share New York Stock Exchange* American Depositary Shares (evidenced by American Depositary Receipts), each New York Stock Exchange representing one preferred class A share of Vale Common shares of Vale, no par value per share New York Stock Exchange* American Depositary Shares (evidenced by American Depositary Receipts), each New York Stock Exchange representing one common share of Vale 6.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2017, issued by Vale Overseas New York Stock Exchange 5.625% Guaranteed Notes due 2019, issued by Vale Overseas New York Stock Exchange 4.625% Guaranteed Notes due 2020, issued by Vale Overseas New York Stock Exchange 4.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2022, issued by Vale Overseas New York Stock Exchange 8.25% Guaranteed Notes due 2034, issued by Vale Overseas New York Stock Exchange 6.875% Guaranteed Notes due 2036, issued by Vale Overseas New York Stock Exchange 6.875% Guaranteed Notes due 2039, issued by Vale Overseas New York Stock Exchange 5.625% Notes due 2042, issued by Vale S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Trends and Environmental Issues in Nickel Mining: Sulfides Versus Laterites
    Ore Geology Reviews 38 (2010) 9–26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Global trends and environmental issues in nickel mining: Sulfides versus laterites Gavin M. Mudd ⁎ Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800 Australia Department of Civil Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand article info abstract Article history: Nickel (Ni) is an important metal in modern infrastructure and technology, with major uses in stainless steel, Received 21 January 2010 alloys, electroplating and rechargeable batteries. Economic Ni resources are found in either sulfide or Received in revised form 17 May 2010 laterite-type ores. Although the majority of economic resources are contained in laterite ores, the bulk of Accepted 17 May 2010 historic Ni production has been derived from sulfide ores since laterites require more complex processing. To Available online 1 June 2010 meet future demand for Ni, there is an increasing amount of Ni being mined from laterite ores—leading to increasing energy and greenhouse gas emission costs for Ni production. In many of the major Ni fields of the Keywords: fi Nickel mining world, environmental impacts have also been signi cant, especially in Sudbury in Canada and the Taimyr Nickel sulfide and Kola Peninsulas in Russia. A major gap in the literature remains on historical trends in global Ni mining, Nickel laterite especially with respect to primary aspects such as production, known economic resources and ore grades Sustainable mining and type. This paper compiles and analyses a wide array of data on global Ni mining, presenting a coherent Resource intensity picture of major historical trends and the current industry configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerry Group Annual Report 2019
    KERRY GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Kerry Group is the global leader in taste and nutrition serving the food, beverage and pharmaceutical industries, and is a leader in its consumer foods categories in the chilled cabinet. CONTENTS STRATEGIC REPORT DIRECTORS’ REPORT 5 2019 Results Financial Highlights 90 Board of Directors 6 Our Purpose 92 Report of the Directors 8 Kerry Group at a Glance Governance Report 12 Chairman’s Statement 98 Corporate Governance Report 14 Chief Executive Officer’s Review 107 Audit Committee Report 18 Our People 112 Nomination Committee Report 24 Our Business Model 116 Remuneration Committee Report 26 Our Markets 28 Strategy & Financial Targets 31 Strategic Advantage FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 32 Financial Key 140 Independent Auditors’ Report Performance Indicators 146 Financial Statements 34 Financial Review 154 Notes to the Financial Statements 42 Business Review: Taste & Nutrition 47 Business Review: Consumer Foods SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 49 Sustainability Review 73 Risk Report 216 Financial Definitions ii Kerry Group Annual Report 2019 Kerry Group Annual Report 2019 1 Kerry Group is the global leader in taste and nutrition serving the food, beverage and pharmaceutical industries, and is a leader in its consumer foods categories in the chilled cabinet. Kerry Group Annual Report 2019 1 2 Kerry Group Annual Report 2019 STRATEGIC REPORT STRATEGIC Kerry Group Annual Report 2019 3 STRATEGIC REPORT 2019 RESULTS 4 Kerry Group Annual Report 2019 STRATEGIC REPORT 2019 RESULTS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Group Volume Growth1 Continued
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT Report Number: 10-1117-0032 Phase 2000 Distribution: 1 E-Copy: Vale Limited 1 E-Copy: Golder Associates Ltd
    Effective Date: 30 June 2010 VALE LIMITED EXTERNAL AUDIT OF MINERAL RESERVES VOLUME 2, SECTION 2 MANITOBA OPERATIONS Submitted to: Vale Limited 2060 Flavelle Blvd, Sheridan Park Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5K 1Z9 REPORT Report Number: 10-1117-0032 Phase 2000 Distribution: 1 e-copy: Vale Limited 1 e-copy: Golder Associates Ltd. MANITOBA OPERATIONS AUDIT Executive Summary Golder Associates Ltd.’s (Golder) Competent Persons, David Sprott, P.Eng., and Paul Palmer, P.Eng., P.Geo., have visited the Manitoba Operations Project the week of July 5, 2010 and validated that part of the mineral resource that is the basis for the following mineral reserve estimate as at June 30, 2010 for the Manitoba Operations Project. During the site visit, they inspected mining operations, interviewed personnel and gathered information required to evaluate the appropriateness of the data and methodology used to estimate the mineral resources and mineral reserves. A list of people contacted for this study includes: Rob Smith – Manager – Mines Geology, Manitoba Operations Jean-Yves Cloutier - Director Mineral Reserve Mineral Resource, Vale Business Planning Group Rob Stewart – Manager – Exploration TNB, Vale Business Development Glen House – Senior Geologist, Mines Exploration Brenda Bilton – Resource Geologist, Mines Exploration Al Proulx – Chief Mine Geologist T-3 Mine Dave Babulic – Chief Mine Geologist Birchtree Mine Tim Mayor – Chief Mine Geologist T-1 Mine Janet Southern – Resource Geologist Birchtree Mine Angie Pavetey – Resource GIT T3 Mine Holly
    [Show full text]
  • Questions and Answers Mill Process Operator—Mineral Ore Program #810050
    Questions and Answers Mill Process Operator—Mineral Ore Program #810050 Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities Ministère de la Formation et des Collèges et Universités Effective: January 1, 2012 Revised: May 2014 Questions and Answers Mill Process Operator—Mineral Ore Program #810050 1. Why was the Common Core revised? The Common Core was updated to reflect current practices in the mining industry in Ontario. It was recognized that, in the evolution of the mining industry today, the composition of the previous Common Core required training in several modules that were no longer universally required by all mill process operators. The fact that all workers must be properly trained for the work they are performing has not changed. 2. When will the revised program #810050 be effective? The program will be effective January 1, 2012. 3. Are there new guidelines for the revised Program #810050 now that the specialty modules have been revised? Yes. The guidelines for Program # 810050 have been updated to reflect recent changes to the program. Copies of these guidelines are available from your local MTCU Apprenticeship Office. Some key changes to the guidelines include: • The Common Core must be completed before an employee is permitted to work in the environment. • Certificate of Achievement (C of A) and Certificate of Qualification (C of Q) certificates have been removed from the program. 1 Questions and Answers Mill Process Operator—Mineral Ore Program #810050 4. Will the Common Core Modular Training Standard book for the program be revised and reprinted? Yes. In the meantime, copies of all the revised modules will be available through your local MTCU office, or the Employment Ontario Partners’ Gateway website: http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/eng/eopg/programs/training.html 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Reference Form
    1.1. Statement and Identification of the Responsible Individual Name of the individual responsible Murilo Pinto de Oliveira Ferreira for the content of the Reference Form Position of responsible individual Executive Director Name of the individual responsible Luciano Siani Pires for the content of the Reference Form Position of responsible individual Director of Investor Relations The above-mentioned directors stated that: a. They have reviewed the Reference Form; b. All the information contained in the Reference Form complies with Instruction CVM No. 480, in particular with Articles 14 through 19; c. All the information contained therein is an accurate, precise and complete representation of the economic and financial situation of the issuer and of the risks inherent to its activities and the securities issued by it. 2.1/2.2 Identification and remuneration of Auditors: Does it have auditor? YES CVM (Securities Commission) 287-9 Code Type of Auditor Domestic Name/Corporate name PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes CPF/CNPJ 61.562.112/0002-01 Service start date: 07/24/2009 Service end date: Description of the service Provision of professional services for auditing the annual report from the contracted Company and controlled companies, both for domestic and international purposes, comfort letters for issuance of debts and equities at the Brazilian and international market, certification of internal controls in order to comply with “Section 404” of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; provision of services related to the audit. Total amount
    [Show full text]
  • Sudbury District; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6266, 44P
    ISSN 1916-6141 [online] ISSN 1712-9346 [print] ISBN 978-1-4435-6302-4 [PDF] ISBN 978-1-4435-6301-7 [print] THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry (MNDMF) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDMF does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDMF is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDMF assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDMF. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDMF neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them.
    [Show full text]
  • (Vol.2) Addendum – Mining Health, Safety and Prevention Review
    March 2015 Final Report (vol.2) Addendum Mining Health, Safety and Prevention Review Ministry of Labour Table of Contents Appendices ................................................................................................................................ 2 Appendix A – Support and advice to the Review ...................................................................................... 2 The Advisory Group ............................................................................................................ 2 Internal Responsibility System Working Group.................................................................... 3 Health and Safety Hazards Working Group ......................................................................... 4 Technology/Management of Change Working Group .......................................................... 6 Capacity of the Health and Safety System Working Group ................................................. 7 Training, Skills and Labour Supply Issues Working Group .................................................. 7 Emergency Preparedness and Mine Rescue ...................................................................... 8 Mining Sector Risk Ranking ................................................................................................ 9 Appendix B – Health and Safety Statistics .............................................................................................. 10 Appendix C – Ontario Health and Safety System Partners and Affiliates ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sudbury District; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6276, 51P
    ISSN 1916-6141 (online) ISSN 1712-9346 (print) ISBN 978-1-4435-9090-7 (PDF) ISBN 978-1-4435-9089-1 (print) THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Case Histories of the Application of the Empirical Destressability Index Methodology
    Deep Mining 2010 — M. Van Sint Jan and Y. Potvin (eds) © 2010 Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, ISBN 978-0-9806154-5-6 Recent case histories of the application of the empirical destressability index methodology P. Andrieux Itasca Consulting Canada, Canada J. Hadjigeorgiou University of Toronto, Canada A. Sampson-Forsythe Vale Limited, Canada (previously with Xstrata Nickel, Canada) B. Simser Xstrata Nickel, Canada A. Turichshev Itasca Consulting Canada, Canada R. Brummer Itasca Consulting Canada, Canada Abstract The destressability index methodology for the assessment of the likelihood of success of large-scale confined destress blasts in underground mine pillars was developed empirically, based on documented case studies in hard rock mines. Since its introduction it has been successfully employed to design such blasts at several seismically active mines. This article presents two recent case histories of the application of this methodology. The first case study was at the Fraser Copper Mine in the Sudbury Basin, where a choked destress blast was detonated to stress-shadow a seismically active cut-and-fill mining horizon. Vibrating wire stress cell data were recorded over a period of two years after the blast, which shed some light on the stress remobilisation process that followed this choked destress blast. The second case study was at the Onaping Mine, also in the Sudbury Basin, where a deep seismically active remnant waste pillar was targeted. 1 Introduction The empirical destressability index methodology was developed between 2001 and 2005, and has since been formally used at least four occasions. This technique quantifies the likelihood of success of a large-scale choked destress blast in an underground mine pillar, for given rock mass conditions and a given stress regime.
    [Show full text]