DOCSLIB.ORG

Geoduck Aquaculture in Puget Sound Woodpeckers in Your Neighborhood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geoduck Aquaculture in Puget Sound Woodpeckers in Your Neighborhood What are geoducks? • Panopea generosa • Nisqually word for “dig deep” • Saltwater clams (Bivalve molluscs) native to the PNW • Big, deep, long-lived, very numerous, highly fecund Geoduck Fishery • Began in 1970 • Value increased in 1990s • Extremely lucrative • Managed sustainably but cannot meet demand 7,000 $25,000 http://blogs.menupages.com/boston/Geod 6,000 ucks.jpg $20,000 5,000 $15,000 4,000 3,000 Production (MT) $10,000 2,000 Value (2003 $000's US) $5,000 1,000 0 $0 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 Production Value J. Patrick Fisher Jonathan King, Northern Economics What is geoduck aquaculture? • Aquaculture: agriculture in the water • “farming” geoducks for human food • Methods developed by WDFW for fisheries enhancement • Adapted by shellfish industry • Rapid expansion B. Vadopalas P.S. McDonald 70% 60% 50% Fishery 40% 30% Culture 20% 10% 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Percent change in WA geoduck landings and aquaculture production (Jonathan King, Northern Economics, Anchorage AK, Personal Communication). How does it work? Spawning Broodstock Geoduck “Seed” Broodstock Images by PS McDonald, R Smith, and J Davis How does it work? PVC tubes – “anti- Tubes covered with net Net and tubes removed predator structures” Net and tubes left in after 2-3 years place for 2-3 years Geoduck remain for 5-7 years total before harvest Images by PS McDonald and R Smith How does it work? Geoducks harvested using low pressure water hoses Causes “liquefaction” of the sediment around the clam’s body, allowing them to be removed easily Images by PS McDonald and R Smith How is it Managed? • Complex regulatory and Federal State Local permit process Department of Natural Resources US Army Corps of Engineers Department of Health City/County government Consultation Department of with other Fish and agencies: Wildlife US Fish & Wildlife NOAA Department of Ecology US EPA So what is the problem? • Habitat effects? • Genetic effects? • Tubes and nets physically alter • What are the genetic effects the habitat of growing geoducks within • Harvesting liquefies sediment the range of wild geoduck? • Food web effects? • Disease effects? • Clam abundance change the • What is the likelihood that ecosystem—they eat plankton having a high concentration of that would be eaten by geoducks leads to a disease someone else epidemic? Will this impact the local wild geoduck? • Nutrient effects: increased nitrogen and phosphorus near farms? • Little Peer-Reviewed Science • Heated Debate Who are the stakeholders? What do they think? • Growers • “They are putting feedlots in PS and they • Environmental are feeding off our advocates fishery resources to • Local property owners fatten up their product” • Resource Managers: WDFW/WDNR • “They are picking places with high ecological • Washington Treaty value…they want the Tribes most pristine areas with • Geoduck Fishermen eel grass and other valuable resources” Who are the stakeholders? What do they think? • Growers • “The disturbance isn’t continuous. After several tide • Environmental cycles, you see the critters advocates back.” • “We try to avoid firefights by • Local property owners looking for areas without multiple use, but those areas • Resource Managers: are getting harder to find.” WDFW/WDNR • “ Mature geoducks filter up to 31 gallons of water per day, • Washington Treaty Tribes removing nutrients that promote algae blooms that rob • Geoduck Fishermen the water of oxygen vital to marine life…and the feces from geoducks helps feed sea grasses that are a critical component of the nearshore habitat.” Who are the stakeholders? What do they think? • Growers • “Clams are blasted out of the sand with high • Environmental advocates pressure water hoses, • Local property owners temporarily turning the tideflats into a liquefied, • Resource Managers: soupy mess.” WDFW/WDNR • Washington Treaty Tribes • “I came home from work • Geoduck Fishermen one day a year ago and there it was in front of my house. It’s a horrible eyesore. I wish they would take it out.” Who are the stakeholders? What do they think? • Growers • “Commercial geoduck clam aquaculture occurs on • Environmental privately-held or leased lands and to date has been advocates mostly in intertidal areas (on • Local property owners beaches).” • Resource Managers: WDFW/WDNR • “A WDFW Aquatic Farm Registration and Washington • Washington Treaty Tribes Department of Health Shellfish License are required • Geoduck Fishermen to cultivate and sell farm- raised geoducks.” What else would you like to know about this issue? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abstracts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104Th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, Ashingtw On, March 24–29, 2012
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles 4-2012 Abstracts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, ashingtW on, March 24–29, 2012 National Shellfisheries Association Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation National Shellfisheries Association, Abstr" acts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, ashingtW on, March 24–29, 2012" (2012). VIMS Articles. 524. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/524 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, 231, 2012. ABSTRACTS OF TECHNICAL PAPERS Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Seattle, Washington March 24–29, 2012 231 National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, Washington Abstracts 104th Annual Meeting, March 24–29, 2012 233 CONTENTS Alisha Aagesen, Chris Langdon, Claudia Hase AN ANALYSIS OF TYPE IV PILI IN VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS AND THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN PACIFICOYSTERCOLONIZATION........................................................... 257 Cathryn L. Abbott, Nicolas Corradi, Gary Meyer, Fabien Burki, Stewart C. Johnson, Patrick Keeling MULTIPLE GENE SEGMENTS ISOLATED BY NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING
    [Show full text]
  • WHELKS Scientific Names: Busycon Canaliculatum Busycon Carica
    Colloquial Nicknames: Channeled Whelk Knobbed Whelk WHELKS Scientific names: Busycon canaliculatum Busycon carica Field Markings: The shell of open with their strong muscular foot. As both species is yellow-red or soon as the valves open, even the tiniest orange inside and pale gray amount, the whelk wedges in the sharp edge outside. of its shell, inserts the proboscis and Size: Channeled whelk grows up devours the soft body of the clam. to 8 inches long; knobbed whelk Mating occurs by way of internal grows up to 9 inches long and 4.5 inches wide fertilization; sexes are separate. The egg casing of the whelk is a Habitat: Sandy or muddy bottoms long strand of yellowish, parchment-like disks, resembling a Seasonal Appearance: Year-round necklace - its unique shape is sculpted by the whelk’s foot. Egg cases can be two to three feet long and have 70 to 100 capsules, DISTINGUISHING FEATURES AND each of which can hold 20 to 100 eggs. Newly hatched channeled BEHAVIORS whelks escape from small holes at the top of each egg case with Whelks are large snails with massive shells. The two most their shells already on. Egg cases are sometimes found along common species in Narragansett Bay are the knobbed whelk the Bay shoreline, washed up with the high tide debris. and the channeled whelk. The knobbed whelk is the largest marine snail in the Bay. It Relationship to People is pear-shaped with a flared outer lip and knobs on the shoulder Both channeled and knobbed whelks scavenge and hunt for of its shell.
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Geoducks—A Compendium
    34, NUMBER 1 VOLUME JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH APRIL 2015 JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH Vol. 34, No. 1 APRIL 2015 JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH CONTENTS VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1 APRIL 2015 Geoducks — A compendium ...................................................................... 1 Brent Vadopalas and Jonathan P. Davis .......................................................................................... 3 Paul E. Gribben and Kevin G. Heasman Developing fisheries and aquaculture industries for Panopea zelandica in New Zealand ............................... 5 Ignacio Leyva-Valencia, Pedro Cruz-Hernandez, Sergio T. Alvarez-Castaneda,~ Delia I. Rojas-Posadas, Miguel M. Correa-Ramırez, Brent Vadopalas and Daniel B. Lluch-Cota Phylogeny and phylogeography of the geoduck Panopea (Bivalvia: Hiatellidae) ..................................... 11 J. Jesus Bautista-Romero, Sergio Scarry Gonzalez-Pel aez, Enrique Morales-Bojorquez, Jose Angel Hidalgo-de-la-Toba and Daniel Bernardo Lluch-Cota Sinusoidal function modeling applied to age validation of geoducks Panopea generosa and Panopea globosa ................. 21 Brent Vadopalas, Jonathan P. Davis and Carolyn S. Friedman Maturation, spawning, and fecundity of the farmed Pacific geoduck Panopea generosa in Puget Sound, Washington ............ 31 Bianca Arney, Wenshan Liu, Ian Forster, R. Scott McKinley and Christopher M. Pearce Temperature and food-ration optimization in the hatchery culture of juveniles of the Pacific geoduck Panopea generosa ......... 39 Alejandra Ferreira-Arrieta, Zaul Garcıa-Esquivel, Marco A. Gonzalez-G omez and Enrique Valenzuela-Espinoza Growth, survival, and feeding rates for the geoduck Panopea globosa during larval development ......................... 55 Sandra Tapia-Morales, Zaul Garcıa-Esquivel, Brent Vadopalas and Jonathan Davis Growth and burrowing rates of juvenile geoducks Panopea generosa and Panopea globosa under laboratory conditions .......... 63 Fabiola G. Arcos-Ortega, Santiago J. Sanchez Leon–Hing, Carmen Rodriguez-Jaramillo, Mario A.
    [Show full text]
  • Uvic Thesis Template
    Coastal aquaculture in British Columbia: Perspectives on finfish, shellfish, seaweed and Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) from three First Nation communities by Kathryn Tebbutt B.A., University of British Columbia, 2009 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Geography Kathryn Tebbutt, 2014 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Coastal aquaculture in British Columbia: Perspectives on finfish, shellfish, seaweed and Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) from three First Nation communities by Kathryn Tebbutt B.A., University of British Columbia, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Mark Flaherty, (Department of Geography) Supervisor Dr. Denise Cloutier, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Stephen Cross, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Mark Flaherty, (Department of Geography) Supervisor Dr. Denise Cloutier, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Stephen Cross, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Most aquaculture tenures in British Columbia (BC) are located in coastal First Nation traditional territories, making the aquaculture industry very important to First Nation communities. Marine aquaculture, in particular salmon farming, has been labeled one of the most controversial industries in BC and various groups with differing opinions have created a wide-spread media debate known as the “aquaculture controversy”. Industry, government, and (E)NGO’s are often the most visible players; First Nations, especially those without aquaculture operations directly in their territories, are often excluded or underrepresented in the conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Aquaculture
    Presented by Canadian agencies and organizations currently undertaking aquaculture research in Canada CANADIAN AQUACULTURE R&D REVIEW Includes 150 summaries of recent research projects on salmon, trout, charr, oysters, mussels, marine species plus special full length features on completed projects across the country. CANADIAN AQUACULTURE R&D REVIEW Bridging research, development CONTENTS and commercialisation Improving awareness of aquaculture R&D key components are a new internal DFO FINFISH - FRESHWATER ......................3 activities in Canada and increasing transfer of Program for Regulatory Research (PARR) and knowledge and technology to the aquaculture core funding for the Centre for Integrated sector has been the goal of the aquaculture Aquaculture Science, a DFO virtual Centre of FINFISH - SALMON .............................9 R&D review since its inception in 2004. It grew Expertise based in St. Andrews, NB that focuses out of efforts by the federal and provincial on ecosystem-based approaches. The objective governments to improve aquaculture R&D of AIMAP is to improve the competitiveness FINFISH - MARINE ............................15 coordination and communication in Canada. of the Canadian aquaculture industry by This third bi-annual edition continues to encouraging an aquaculture sector that build on the success of the first two editions. It continuously develops and adopts innovative POLYCULTURE ..................................18 summarises about 150 R&D projects that have technologies and management techniques been
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal and Dietary Optimization in the Hatchery Culture Of
    THERMAL AND DIETARY OPTIMIZATION IN THE HATCHERY CULTURE OF JUVENILE PACIFIC GEODUCK CLAMS (PANOPEA GENEROSA, GOULD 1850) by Bianca Danielle Arney B.Sc. (Hons.), Hawaii Pacific University, 2009 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Applied Animal Biology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2013 © Bianca Danielle Arney, 2013 Abstract This research is the first to examine thermal and dietary optimization in the hatchery culture of juvenile Pacific geoduck (Panopea generosa). Chapter 2 investigated temperature and feed ration optimization; chapter 3 examined live algae substitution with the spray-dried species, Schizochytrium spp. or Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis). Geoduck growth and survival were measured to quantify treatment success. The temperature trial tested four temperatures (7, 11, 15, 19 °C) in juvenile and post-larval culture. Temperature promoted a significant growth effect in both sizes. The 19 °C culture elicited a delayed growth benefit in juveniles, and suppressed ash- free dry weight (AFDW), which recommends utilization of 15 °C. In contrast, geoduck post- larvae displayed immediate (post 7 d) shell growth acceleration at 19 °C. The 19 °C temperature shortened the rearing period by 2.9 d, suggesting its application in post-larval culture. The ration experiment examined the feed ration requirements of four geoduck juvenile size classes. Ration quantities between 0.0 - 128.0x10⁶ equivalent Isochrysis cells individual⁻¹ day⁻¹ were tested. All treatments received Chaetoceros muelleri and Isochrysis sp. mixed by AFDW. Following shell length/wet weight optimization, the following rations (10⁶ equivalent Isochrysis cells individual⁻¹ day⁻¹) should be applied between week 1 and 4 of the tested geoduck culture: 4.0 (1); 8.0 (2); 16.0 or 32.0 (shell length or wet weight optimum, respectively; 3); and 32.0 (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Geoduck Aquaculture Research Program (GARP)
    FINAL REPORT Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Washington Sea Grant website at wsg.washington.edu/geoduck For more information contact: Washington Sea Grant University of Washington 3716 Brooklyn Ave. N.E. Box 355060 Seattle, WA 98105-6716 206.543.6600 wsg.washington.edu [email protected] November 2013 • WSG-TR 13-03 Acknowledgements ashington Sea Grant expresses its appreciation to the many individuals who provided information and support Wfor this report. In particular, we gratefully acknowledge research program funding provided by the Washington State Legislature, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Washington State Department of Ecology, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and University of Washington. We also would like to thank shellfish growers who cooperated with program investigators to make this research possible. Finally, we would like to recognize the guidance provided by the Department of Ecology and the Shellfish Aquaculture Regulatory Committee. Primary Investigators/ Contributing Scientists Washington Sea Grant Staff Recommended Citation Report Authors Jeffrey C. Cornwell David Armstrong Penelope Dalton Washington Sea Grant Carolyn S. Friedman Lisa M. Crosson Marcus Duke (2013) Final Report: P. Sean McDonald Jonathan Davis David G. Gordon Geoduck aquaculture Jennifer Ruesink Elene M. Dorfmeier Teri King research program. Report Brent Vadopalas Tim Essington Meg Matthews to the Washington State Glenn R. VanBlaricom Paul Frelier Robyn Ricks Legislature. Washington Aaron W. E. Galloway Eric Scigliano Sea Grant Technical Report Micah J. Horwith Raechel Waters WSG-TR 13-03, 122 pp. Perry Lund Dan Williams Kate McPeek Roger I. E. Newell Julian D. Olden Michael S. Owens Jennifer L. Price Kristina M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Environment on Arctica Islandica Shell Formation and Architecture
    Biogeosciences, 14, 1577–1591, 2017 www.biogeosciences.net/14/1577/2017/ doi:10.5194/bg-14-1577-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The effects of environment on Arctica islandica shell formation and architecture Stefania Milano1, Gernot Nehrke2, Alan D. Wanamaker Jr.3, Irene Ballesta-Artero4,5, Thomas Brey2, and Bernd R. Schöne1 1Institute of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Joh.-J.-Becherweg 21, 55128 Mainz, Germany 2Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 3Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212, USA 4Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, the Netherlands 5Department of Animal Ecology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Correspondence to: Stefania Milano ([email protected]) Received: 27 October 2016 – Discussion started: 7 December 2016 Revised: 1 March 2017 – Accepted: 4 March 2017 – Published: 27 March 2017 Abstract. Mollusks record valuable information in their hard tribution, and (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was parts that reflect ambient environmental conditions. For this used to detect changes in microstructural organization. Our reason, shells can serve as excellent archives to reconstruct results indicate that A. islandica microstructure is not sen- past climate and environmental variability. However, animal sitive to changes in the food source and, likely, shell pig- physiology and biomineralization, which are often poorly un- ment are not altered by diet. However, seawater temperature derstood, can make the decoding of environmental signals had a statistically significant effect on the orientation of the a challenging task.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Shellfish Aquaculture Is Converting Puget Sound Aquatic Habitat to Agricultural Use
    Industrial Shellfish Aquaculture is Converting Puget Sound Aquatic Habitat to Agricultural Use How much expansion is good for Puget Sound? Geoduck farm, Nisqually Reach, 6/30/07 Copyright © Coalition to Preserve Puget Sound Habitat, 2007, all rights reserved. Our concerns are: 2 Habitat degradation and fragmentation The trend of converting natural ecosystems to agricultural use The extent of expansion Environmental impacts: unknown Invasive species and disease Interference with recreational and residential uses Marine debris Zangle Cove, 4/29/06 Approximately 43,500 tubes planted per acre (about 8 miles of PVC pipe) with either individual net tops or canopy nets that cover the entire installation; Geoducks are not an 3 essential food. “…geoduck is a super luxury item which only the rich can afford. The product’s price in the Chinese market can reach $60 to $100 per pound. If the price of the product were to fall by 50 percent, it will still be out of the price range of most of the population.” -- The World Geoduck Market and the Potential for Geoduck Aquaculture on Washington State Lands , prepared for DNR by Northern Economics, Inc. Geoduck and oyster bag 2004 operation – Totten Inlet Shellfish Industry ‘working waterfront’ 4 New intensive methods are converting natural beaches into single use agricultural zones. How does this square with the requirement of the Shoreline Management Act to achieve “no net loss” in ecological function? To the average person, it is common sense that this is a disturbance to both people and wildlife. “We believe the environmental impacts are at worst benign and at best they’re beneficial.” --Shellfish Industry, Seattle Times, 10/5/06 Totten Inlet 6/26/06 When did the shift to new 5 intensive techniques appear in Totten Inlet? (as reported by Totten Inlet residents) Prior to about 1992, no conflict with shellfish farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfish Hatchery
    EAST HAMPTON TOWN SHELLFISH HATCHERY The 2015 Crew, left to right: Kate, Pete, Carissa, Shelby, and Barley 2015 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2016 OPERATING PLAN Prepared by Kate Rossi-Snook Edited by Barley Dunne East Hampton Town Shellfish Hatchery The skiff loaded for seeding in Lake Montauk Annual Report of Operations Mission Statement With a hatchery on Fort Pond Bay, a nursery on Three Mile Harbor, and a floating raft field growout system in Napeague Harbor, the East Hampton Town Shellfish Hatchery produces large quantities of oyster (Crassostrea virginica), clam (Mercenaria mercenaria), and bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) seed to enhance valuable shellfish stocks in local waterways. Shellfish are available for harvest by all permitted town residents. Cooperative research and experimentation concerning shellfish culture, the subsequent success of seed in the wild, and the status of the resource is undertaken and reported upon regularly, often funded and validated by scientific research grants. Educational opportunities afforded by the work include school group and open house tours and educational displays at community functions. Annual reporting includes production statistics and values, seed dissemination information, results of research initiatives, a summary of outreach efforts, the status of current and developing infrastructure, and a plan for the following year’s operations. 2015 Full-time Staff Part-time and Contractual Volunteers John “Barley” Dunne – Director Carissa Maurin – Environmental Aide Romy Macari Kate Rossi-Snook – Hatchery Manager Shelby Joyce – Environmental Aide (summer) Christopher Fox-Strauss Pete Topping – Algae Culturist Adam Younes – Environmental Aide (fall) Jeremy Gould – Maintenance Mechanic Carissa and Pete unloading OysterGros Special Thanks to: Barnaby Friedman for producing our annual seeding maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual
    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
    [Show full text]