DOCSLIB.ORG

Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 Edition Issue Brief April 2021 | No. IF19E01 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 Edition Key Points n the 46th memorial of Roe v. Wade, New York In 2019, Illinois and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law the repealed existing laws that protect infants that survive Reproductive Health Act which repealed legal abortion, setting off a national O debate about medical care for protections for infants who survive abortion.1 The celebration abortion survivors. of this law in New York City, followed by comments by Virginia Governor Ralph Northam which seemed to endorse Currently, federal law does not ensure that each infant that infanticide, launched the question of born-alive abortion survives an abortion is given survivors into the conscience of America. proper medical care, despite 77 percent of Americans supporting these policies. Congress and state legislatures across the country have responded to these radical positions by putting forth legislation This issue affects real people. In only nine states that require to protect infants who survive abortion. However, Democrat reporting on abortion survivors, 203 cases of infants that politicians have blocked efforts in Congress and in state survived an abortion have been reported. legislatures to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act which requires that life-saving medical care be given to babies born alive after failed abortion attempts. In This report can be read online at frc.org/bornalive 801 G. St. NW Washington, D.C. 20001 | frc.org | (202) 323-2100 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 | No. IF19E01 2019, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to bring this bill up for a vote in the House over 80 times, and Democrat Governors in North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Montana all vetoed similar legislation. There has been much debate and false information spread about these bills and the general nature of infants born alive after an abortion attempt. Here are the facts: Do babies survive failed abortions? • Yes. In fact, a 2018 European study done “[t]o evaluate the rate of live birth and the duration of survival after termination of pregnancy [between 20-24 weeks gestation] without feticide” found that over half of these 241 peri-viable pregnancies resulted in live births with a “median survival time” of 32 minutes.2 • In the United States, the CDC reports that from 2003-2014 at least 143 infants died after being born alive during an abortion procedure, and the report admits that this is almost certainly an underestimate.3 There are no federal abortion reporting requirements, which leaves a massive gap in state reporting. • According to the CDC, of the 143 infant deaths involving induced pregnancy terminations, 97 involved a maternal complication or one or more congenital anomalies. We do not know why the remaining 46 infants were allowed to die. • The CDC took this data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) Mortality Data in regard to infant deaths, which included deaths occurring to infants who met the legal definition of a live birth, which includes “any sign of life, e.g., breath, heartbeat, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles.”4 That’s 143 babies that were reported to be clearly alive and who later died.5 • As stated by the CDC: “Data available for 2003 and subsequent years includes not only causes of death coded to ICD-10, but also the original text describing the causes of death as reported on the death certificate by the cause-of-death certifier (usually a physician, medical examiner or coroner).”6 2 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 | No. IF19E01 • As can be clearly seen, many of the causes of death for the infants were elective or medical terminations—not just fetal abnormalities or maternal medical reasons like abortion advocates would have the public believe. The CDC report also includes a list of the following terms that were reported on death certificates “that indicate an induced termination of pregnancy” from 2003 to 2014:7 • Abortion for maternal medical reasons • Abruptio placentae following insertion of laminaria for maternal elective abortion • Attempted elective abortion (mother changed her mind) • Attempted self-abortion • Chemical abortion • Cytotec termination • Cytotec-induced abortion • Desires second trimester abortion • Elective abortion • Elective induction • Elective termination • Elective termination by patient • Elective termination of pregnancy • Failed abortion • Failed medical abortion • Induced abortion • Induced delivery • Induced loss of pregnancy • Induced termination • Induced termination of pregnancy • Induced termination of pregnancy by laminariea placement • Induction of labor 3 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 | No. IF19E01 • Induction of labor for pregnancy termination • Induction of labor for termination of pregnancy • Induction termination • Induction termination of previable infant • Interrupted elected termination of pregnancy • Labor induction for pregnancy termination • Maternal use of abortant • Medical abortion • Medical termination • Medical termination of pregnancy • Medically indicated termination of pregnancy • Medically induced termination • Medication-induced abortion • Misoprostol-induced abortion • Patient initiated termination • Prostaglandin termination • Self-induced abortion • Termination induction • Termination of pregnancy by labor induction • Termination of pregnancy by prostaglandin • Termination, elective • Therapeutic abortion • Therapeutic termination • Therapeutic termination of pregnancy • Voluntary interruption of pregnancy • Voluntary termination of pregnancy • VTOP (voluntary termination of pregnancy) 4 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 | No. IF19E01 The CDC notes that the language of these terms “is unedited and exactly that used by the cause-of- death certifier.”8 How long did those 143 infants survive before their death? After these babies were delivered alive after an attempted termination of their life by an induced abortion, some of them struggled for life for more than 24 hours. The distribution of age at death for deaths involving induced terminations are as follows:9 Age at death Frequency Percent <10 minutes 25 17.5 10-59 minutes 35 24.5 1-4 hours 68 47.6 5-23 hours 9 6.3 1 day or more 6 4.2 Are states required to report on born-alive births after a failed abortion attempt? Yes. With South Dakota passing a law in 2021 to require reporting on children who are born alive during an abortion, there are now nine states that require this type of reporting: Arkansas,10 Arizona,11 Florida,12 Indiana,13 Michigan,14 Minnesota,15 Oklahoma,16 South Dakota,17 and Texas.18 As of 2020, only Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Michigan, and Minnesota have publicly reported any cases, totaling at least 203 cases in which an infant survived an abortion. • Arizona: Since 2017 Arizona has reported double digit numbers each year for infants who survive abortion, reporting 10 in 2017,19 12 in 2018,20 and 15 in 2019.21 The annual abortion reports do not specify whether any of these babies survived past birth or where they are now. 5 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 | No. IF19E01 • Arkansas: In 2020, Arkansas released their first report detailing abortion complications and the number of infants that survive abortion. This report captured numbers from the day the law was enacted on July 24, 2019 through the end of 2019. However, there were no cases of infants that survived abortion reported.22 • Florida: Florida has reported 27 cases including four in 2015,23 11 in 2017,24 six in 2018,25 two in 2019,26 and seven in 2020.27 Florida’s reports do not say what happened to the babies after they were born. • Indiana: Indiana requires all physicians who perform a surgical abortion to report whether the child was delivered alive, and if the physician “gave the fetus the best opportunity to survive.” As of 2019, Indiana has reported 27 cases in which the infant survived a failed abortion.28 • Michigan: Michigan reports on whether there are signs of life after a failed abortion; so far, Michigan has reported 84 such cases, the most of any state.29 Since 2006 Michigan has reported 17 such cases,30 with as many as five in 2011.31 • Minnesota: Minnesota has reported 19 babies born alive following a failed abortion. With five in 2015,32 five in 2016,33 three in 2017,34 three in 2018,35 and three in 2019.36 Minnesota also reports on what type of treatment was administered to the child but does not state what gestational age each child was born. • Oklahoma: Oklahoma includes reporting on the number of infants born-alive from abortions in their annual abortion surveillance report, but as of the 2019 report, Oklahoma has not reported any instances of infants that have survived abortion.37 • South Dakota: In 2021, South Dakota passed legislation requiring the number of infants who survived an attempted abortion to their Department of Health. • Texas: Texas has included reporting on infants who survive abortion since 2013, but in 2019, the state strengthened their enforcement of born-alive protections.38 The resulting 2019 report indicated six infants were born alive after a failed abortion.39 Here are two personal accounts of abortion survivors: Gianna Jessen had been in the womb for seven months before her mother went to a Planned Parenthood facility40 to have a late-term saline abortion.41 (Saline abortions rarely if ever happen 6 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 | No. IF19E01 anymore in the United States for abortions up to 24 weeks gestation. This technique has been replaced with an equally gruesome one that dismembers a child limb from limb, known as a dilation & excavation, or “D&E.”42) Saline abortions use a saline solution to poison the baby, which burns him or her inside and out, even burning off the outer layer of their skin. The child suffers in these conditions for over an hour until their demise, and the mother must deliver her dead child the next day.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 2015 Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Challenging Texas’ Pro-Life Law by Dave Andrusko
    November 2015 Supreme Court agrees to hear lawsuit challenging Texas’ pro-life law By Dave Andrusko As widely, but not universally issue and lower courts have expected, the United States disagreed over the requirement Supreme Court agreed Friday that abortionists have admitting to take up a lawsuit brought by privileges at a nearby hospital a coalition of abortion providers for situations of medical that challenges two provisions emergencies. HB2 also requires of H.B. 2, an omnibus 2013 that abortion clinics meet the Texas law. same building standards as However reluctant justices ambulatory surgical centers. may (or may not) have been It is noteworthy what to wade into the abortion was never challenged: the controversy, it made sense Pain-Capable Unborn Child for the High Court to hear Protection Act. Also not before Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole. Abortion is an important See “Court,” page 17 Frustrated with Congress? Elect a Pro-life President and more pro-life senators By Karen Cross, National Right to Life Political Director According to a Gallup poll life legislation and it goes to released November 12, only the U.S. Senate. Under most 11% of Americans approve of circumstances sixty votes are Congress – the lowest point this required for passage. We don’t year and one of the lowest ever. have 60 pro-life votes in the But pro-lifers are frustrated Senate. for a very different reason. Both The Pain-Capable Unborn houses of Congress have strong Child Protection Act (H.R. pro-life leadership, but their 36), which would protect from efforts have been stymied by abortion unborn children 20 pro-abortion President Barack weeks or older, easily passed Obama and an entrenched pro- the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • General Population Knowledge, Aptitude, Perception and Behavior
    2013 KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, BEHAVIOUR & PERCEPTIONS (KABP) Sint Maarten SEX, SEXUALITY AND FAMILY PLANNING KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, BEHAVIOUR AND PERCEPTIONS (KABP) SEX, SEXUALITY AND FAMILY PLANNING BASELINE STUDY 2013 SINT MAARTEN Website: http://www.qureltd.com Office: 1 (868) 224-3479 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is a product of the collective efforts of the Government of Sint Maarten under The Ministry of Public Health, Social Development and Labour, the people of Sint Maarten and QURE International. I sincerely wish to thank Mrs. Rose Pooran-Fleming, the Policy Advisor and Project Coordinator of Social Security and Pensions at the Department of Social Development, who spent tireless hours providing invaluable feedback during the planning and implementation phases of this project. To Ms. Margje Troost, Project Officer at the HIV/AIDS Programme Management Team who reviewed and commented on the draft document, my gratitude to you. To all other members of the working team, thank you for your comments along the way. Special thanks to the Head of the Department of Statistics, Ms. Makini Hickinson and Senior Statistical Analyst Ms. Maurette Antersijn, who assisted in the development of the sampling strategy and the selection of the sample. I wish to acknowledge Mrs. Veronica Webster and her team of Webster International who played a critical role in the recruitment and training of enumerators, the organization of focus groups and more importantly the collection of the data, without which this report would not have been possible. Many thanks to Mr. John O’Connor who unreservedly provided his expertise in scouting the various locales needed to access specific members of the target populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
    UNITED NATIONS, I CEDAW Convention on the Elimination ..,, of All Forms of Discrimination Distr I against Women GENERAL CEDAW/C/SR 143 2 March 1989 MAR 3 O i989 ORIGINAL ENGLISH \ \i"-.\ ! Si...i... I.... \.A..... !.. ..... ' AQ1N COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN Eighth session SUMMARY RECORD OF THE 143rd MEETING Held at the Vienna International Centre, Vienna, on Tuesday, 28 February 1989, at 9 3U am Chairperson Ms EVATT CONTENTS Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention (continued) Adoption of the agenda and organization of work (continued) This record is subJect to correction Corrections should be submitted in one of the working languages They should be set forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record They should be sent within one week of the date of distribution of this document to the Head, Translation Service, room 00749 Any corrections to the records of the meetings of this session will be consolidated in a single corrigendum, to be issued shortly after the end of the session V 89 52505 3979e /. CEDAW/C/SR 143 English Page 2 The meeting was called to order at 9 45 am CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 18 OF THE CONVENTION (continued) I ' \ Initial report of Belgium (CEDAW/C/5/Add 53) l At the invitation of the Chairperson, Ms Monballyu (Belgium) took a place at the Committee table 2 Ms 1 MONBALLYU (Belgium), introducing her country's initial report (CEDAW/C/5/Add 53), said that Belgium had ratified the
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts [PDF | 206.9 K.O. ]
    Scientific Meeting between Pôle Suds-Ceped-Unige Progress in Access to Abortion in Restrictive Contexts: Historical and International Perspectives Tuesday, December 8th, 2015 First Session: Strategies to improve access to abortion in legally restrictive contexts Safe abortion outside of the law in the northeast of the Caribbean Gail Pheterson - Yamila Azize Small island exigencies and a legacy of colonial jurisprudence set the stage for this three-year study in 2001–2003 of abortion practice on several islands of the northeast Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua, St Kitts, St Martin and Sint Maarten. Based on in-depth interviews with 26 physicians, 16 of whom were performing abortions, it found that licensed physicians are routinely providing abortions in contravention of the law, and that those services, tolerated by governments and legitimised by European norms, are clearly the mainstay of abortion care on these islands. Medical abortion was being used both under medical supervision and through self-medication. Women travelled to find anonymous services, and also to access a particular method, provider or facility. Sometimes they settled for a less acceptable method if they could not afford a more comfortable one. Significantly, legality was not the main determinant of choice. Most abortion providers accepted the current situation as satisfactory. However, our findings suggest that restrictive laws were hindering access to services and compromising quality of care. Whereas doctors may have the liberty and knowledge to practise illegal abortions, women have no legal right to these services. Interviews suggest that an increasing number of women are self-inducing abortions with misoprostol to avoid doctors, high fees and public stigma.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion at Or Over 20 Weeks' Gestation
    Abortion At or Over 20 Weeks’ Gestation: Frequently Asked Questions Matthew B. Barry, Coordinator Section Research Manager April 30, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45161 Abortion At or Over 20 Weeks’ Gestation: Frequently Asked Questions Summary Legislation at the federal and state levels seeking to limit or ban abortions in midpregnancy has focused attention on the procedure and the relatively small number of women who choose to undergo such an abortion. According to the Guttmacher Institute, about 926,200 abortions were performed in 2014; 1.3% of abortions were performed at or over 21 weeks’ gestation in 2013. A 2018 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine study found that most women who have abortions are unmarried (86%), are poor or low-income (75%), are under age 30 (72%), and are women of color (61%). Stages of Pregnancy and Abortion Procedures A typical, full-term pregnancy spans 40 weeks, separated into trimesters: first trimester (week 1 through week 13), second trimester (week 14 through week 27), and third trimester (week 28 through birth). Abortion in the second trimester can be performed either by using a surgical procedure or by using drugs to induce labor. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2014 a surgical method was used for 98.8% of U.S. abortions at 14-15 weeks’ gestation, 98.4% at 16-17 weeks, 96.6% at 18-20 weeks, and 90.2% at 21 weeks or later. Proposed Legislation Related to Abortion Legislation in the 115th Congress, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Evidence, Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention in Latin America and the Caribbean
    International Interagency Meeting: Current Evidence, Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention in Latin America and the Caribbean March 17-19, 2014 Managua, Nicaragua Internationa FINAL REPORT 0 TABLE OF CONTENT Acronyms ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….……………………………………….. 5 II. Meeting Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 III. Shared prosperity and adolescent pregnancy ……………………………………………………………. 8 IV. Panel 1: Current Situation of Adolescent Pregnancy and its Major Risk Factors and Social Determinants in the LAC Region …………………………………. 9 V. Panel 2: Strategies oF Sexual and Reproductive Health oF Adolescents, Including the Prevention oF Teen Pregnancy …………………………………………. 13 VI. Special Presentation: Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Using the Health Impact Pyramid ……………………………………………………………………………….. 16 VII. Panel 3: Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Addressing the Socio-economic Determinants to Prevent Teen Pregnancies ……………………………... 18 VIII. Panel 4: Strengthening the Regulatory Environment to Prevent Teen Pregnancy ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20 IX. Special Presentation: Current Evidence in First and Second Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention ……………………………………………………………………………. 23 X. Panel 5A: State oF the Art in Comprehensive Sexual Education and Community Interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean …………………………. 25 XI. Panel 5B. State oF the Art in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Services ……………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Into the Hands of the Medical Profession: the Regulation of Abortion in England Ane Wales
    U j-t lili -i '. ;v,r!ji SALLY SHELDON r -;v p . :T $ m •;■ : ili ■*:■ lit INTO THE HANDS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION: THE REGULATION OF ABORTION IN ENGLAND ANE WALES Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the Degree of Doctor of the European University Institute. Florence, August 1994 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE H C i U À . 1 j r SALLY SHELDON ^ j j INTO THE HANDS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION: THE REGULATION OF ABORTION IN ENGLAND AND WALES Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the Degree of Doctor of the European University Institute. LRU) H C n h d kS SHE Florence, August 1994 "One example has been given to me by a general practitioner of a girt, unmarried, and, therefore, one of the minority of cases of illegal abortion, who came to him about two or three months ago, said she was pregnant, and that she wished to have her pregnancy terminated...She said to him that she had come because of the Bill "ƒ believe that I have grounds under that", she said He told her, "I happen to know the sponsor of the Bill I have looked at the Bill and do not think that under it you have grounds. " He talked to the girl and put her in touch with people who could help her. Her pregnancy is now going through in the normal way. It does not follow that because women desire termination it will automatically be carried out. If we can manage to get a girl such as that into the hands of the medical profession, the Bill is succeeding in its objective.
    [Show full text]
  • A Current Listing of Contents
    WOMEN'S STUDIES LIBRARIAN The University of Wisconsin System EMINIST ERIODICALS A CURRENT LISTING OF CONTENTS VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2 SUMMER 1995 Published by Phyllis Holman Weisbard Women I s Studies Librarian University of Wisconsin System 430 Memorial Library / 728 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 263-5754 EMINIST ERIODICALS A CURRENT LISTING OF CONTENTS Volume 15, Number 2 Summer 1995 Periodical literature isthe cutting edge ofwomen's scholarship, feminist theory, and much ofwomen's culture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing of Contents is pUblished by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing pUblic awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminist Periodicals will serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' familiarity with a wide spectrum of feminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a readerwish to sUbscribe toajournal arlo obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary loan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations ofthe new copyright law with regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Table ofcontents pages from current issues ofmajorfeministjournalsare reproduced in each issue ofFeminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing ofall journals we have selected. As publication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of FP. The annotated listing provides the following information on each journal: 1. Year of first publication. 2. Frequency of publication. 3. U.S. sUbscription price(s). 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion and the Law of Innocence
    ZIEGLER.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 8/9/21 6:26 PM ABORTION AND THE LAW OF INNOCENCE Mary Ziegler* As states pass increasingly strict abortion laws in a bid to reverse Roe v. Wade, abortion opponents have suddenly abandoned exceptions for cases of rape and incest. Developing the first legal history of rape and in- cest exceptions, this Article argues that these exceptions open a window into issues of guilt and innocence that define the constitutional jurispru- dence of abortion. In recognizing a right to abortion, the Court portrayed women as vic- tims—of the physical burdens of pregnancy and societal forces governing parenthood. But as the history of the rape and incest debate shows, the rhetoric of guilt and innocence is central to the case to overturn Roe. Seek- ing to dismantle abortion rights, pro-life forces have proposed a hierarchy of innocence. This hierarchy describes guilt as inherently relative, not an absolute but a matter of degrees and comparison. In this hierarchy, fetal life is supremely innocent, regardless of the surrounding circumstances both because an unborn child lacks agency (and therefore responsibility for any decision) and because that child has not yet made any choices, good or bad, for which to be held accountable. As the history of the rape and incest exception reveals, ideas of guilt and innocence have already destabilized protection for abortion. To shore up constitutional protection, supporters of abortion rights have to portray women in a different light—as trustworthy and autonomous rather than vul- nerable to forces beyond their control. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium
    William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice Volume 20 (2013-2014) Issue 1 William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law: 2013 Special Issue: Reproductive Article 7 Justice December 2013 Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium Sybil Shainwald Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Repository Citation Sybil Shainwald, Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium, 20 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 123 (2013), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol20/iss1/7 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl REPRODUCTIVE INJUSTICE IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM SYBIL SHAINWALD* INTRODUCTION I. COMMON LAW, THE EARLY STATUTES, AND THE EMBERS OF REFORM A. Legal Abortions (c. 1250–1803) B. Abortion Becomes a Crime: The Birth of Anti-Abortion Legislation (1803–1900) C. Abortion is Illegal (1900–1960) II. THE TIDE CHANGES A. The Liberalization Movement (1960–1973) B. The Decision in Roe and its Aftermath (1973–1982) C. Twenty-Five Years of Legal Abortions (1982–2007) III. A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RECENT STATE RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION RIGHTS CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION Recent attempts to curb abortion rights through enactment of new, restrictive regulations have sparked fresh debate, and the need to learn from history, rather than be “condemned to repeat it.”1 Forty- three new abortion restrictions were passed by nineteen states in 2012.2 The previous year, a staggering ninety-two restrictions were * Sybil Shainwald graduated from the College of William & Mary (B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICA: How Legislative Overreach Is Turning Reproductive Rights Into Criminal Wrongs Copyright © 2021 National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
    ABORTION IN AMERICA: How Legislative Overreach Is Turning Reproductive Rights Into Criminal Wrongs Copyright © 2021 National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/. It may be reproduced, provided that no charge is imposed, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) is acknowledged as the original publisher and the copyright holder. For any other form of reproduction, please contact NACDL. For more information contact: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers® 1660 L Street NW, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20036 Phone 202-872-8600 www.NACDL.org/Foundation This publication is available online at www.NACDL.org/AbortionCrimReport ABORTION IN AMERICA: How Legislative Overreach Is Turning Reproductive Rights Into Criminal Wrongs Martín Antonio Sabelli President, NACDL San Francisco, CA Christopher W. Adams Immediate Past President, NACDL Charleston, SC Lisa M. Wayne President, NFCJ Denver, CO Norman L. Reimer Executive Director, NACDL & NFCJ Washington, DC Subcommittee of Women in Criminal Defense Committee Nina J. Ginsberg Alexandria, VA Lindsay A. Lewis New York, NY C. Melissa “Missy” Owen Charlotte, NC CONTENTS About the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the NACDL Foundation for Criminal Justice . .1 Preface. 2 Foreword . 3 Acknowledgements ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Responsibility: Women, Society and Abortion Worldwide
    SHARINGTHEALANGUTTMACHERINSTITUTE RESPONSIBILITYWOMEN SOCIETY &ABORTION WORLDWIDE STHE HALAN AGUTTMACHERRIN INSTITUTEG RESPONSIBILITY WOMEN SOCIETY &ABORTION WORLDWIDE Acknowledgments haring Responsibility: Women, Society and Pathfinder International, Peru; Tomas Frejka, independent Abortion Worldwide brings together research consultant, United States; Adrienne Germain, International findings about induced abortion and Women’s Health Coalition, United States; Forrest S unplanned pregnancy from the work of The Greenslade, Harrison McKay and Judith Winkler, Ipas, Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), assisted by a large num- United States; Dale Huntington, Population Council, ber of individuals and organizations. Susheela Singh, direc- Egypt and United States; Ngozi Iwere, Community Life tor of research at AGI, oversaw the development of this Project, Nigeria; Shireen Jejeebhoy, consultant, Special report, which is based on analyses conducted by her, Programme of Research, Development and Research Stanley Henshaw, deputy director of research, Akinrinola Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Bankole, senior research associate, and Taylor Haas, research Organization, Switzerland and India; Evert Ketting, inter- associate. Deirdre Wulf, independent consultant, wrote the national consultant on family planning and sexual and report, which was edited by Dore Hollander, senior editor, reproductive health, Netherlands; Firman Lubis, Yayasan and Jeanette Johnson, director of publications. Kusuma Buana, Indonesia; Paulina Makinwa-Adebusoye, The
    [Show full text]