General Population Knowledge, Aptitude, Perception and Behavior

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Population Knowledge, Aptitude, Perception and Behavior 2013 KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, BEHAVIOUR & PERCEPTIONS (KABP) Sint Maarten SEX, SEXUALITY AND FAMILY PLANNING KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, BEHAVIOUR AND PERCEPTIONS (KABP) SEX, SEXUALITY AND FAMILY PLANNING BASELINE STUDY 2013 SINT MAARTEN Website: http://www.qureltd.com Office: 1 (868) 224-3479 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is a product of the collective efforts of the Government of Sint Maarten under The Ministry of Public Health, Social Development and Labour, the people of Sint Maarten and QURE International. I sincerely wish to thank Mrs. Rose Pooran-Fleming, the Policy Advisor and Project Coordinator of Social Security and Pensions at the Department of Social Development, who spent tireless hours providing invaluable feedback during the planning and implementation phases of this project. To Ms. Margje Troost, Project Officer at the HIV/AIDS Programme Management Team who reviewed and commented on the draft document, my gratitude to you. To all other members of the working team, thank you for your comments along the way. Special thanks to the Head of the Department of Statistics, Ms. Makini Hickinson and Senior Statistical Analyst Ms. Maurette Antersijn, who assisted in the development of the sampling strategy and the selection of the sample. I wish to acknowledge Mrs. Veronica Webster and her team of Webster International who played a critical role in the recruitment and training of enumerators, the organization of focus groups and more importantly the collection of the data, without which this report would not have been possible. Many thanks to Mr. John O’Connor who unreservedly provided his expertise in scouting the various locales needed to access specific members of the target populations. This undoubtedly facilitated the successful completion of this project. His interpretation skills with the Spanish speaking population was also greatly appreciated. In addition, my deepest thanks to all the respondents who openly answered the questions asked of them, some of which were personal and sensitive. Understandably, a project of this scope and depth involved many persons contracted at different periods. And though I was unable to name each person, I would like you to know that this report is a product of your hard work and commitment, and for that, I thank you. Joel Joseph Director QURE International ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS V LIST OF TABLES VI SECTION I 1.0: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 1.1: DEMOGRAPHICS 9 SECTION II 2.0: KNOWLEDGE & AWARENESS 17 2.1: STI/STD TESTING 31 2.2: BELIEFS 39 2.3: SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR 47 2.4: SEXUALITY 59 2.5: FAMILY PLANNING 65 2.6: GENDER ROLES 77 2.7: MEDIA 81 2.8: CONCLUSION 87 SECTION III 3.0: FOCUS GROUP 91 iii SECTION IV 4.0: COMMUNICATION PLAN 103 APPENDICES APPENDIX A- KNOWLEDGE ITEMS I APPENDIX B- ACCEPTABILITY OF SEXUAL ACTS III iv ABBREVIATIONS AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome BCC Behaviour Change Communication HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus MSM Men who have Sex with Men STD Sexually Transmitted Diseases STI Sexually Transmitted Infections SW Sex Worker SXM Sint Maarten VCT Voluntary Counselling and Testing WSW Women who have Sex with Women v LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.0.1 SEX 3 TABLE 1.0.2 SEXUALITY 6 TABLE 1.0.3 FAMILY PLANNING 7 TABLE 1.1.1 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY ZONE 9 TABLE 1.1.2 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY GENDER 10 TABLE 1.1.3 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY NATIONALITY 10 TABLE 1.1.4 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY COUNTRY OF BIRTH 10 TABLE 1.1.5 REGISTERED AT THE CIVIL REGISTRY 11 TABLE 1.1.6 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY AGE 11 TABLE 1.1.7 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY MARITAL STATUS 12 TABLE 1.1. 8 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY RELIGION 12 TABLE 1.1.9 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY LEVEL OF EDUCATION 13 TABLE 1.1.10 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY EMPLOYMENT STATUS 13 TABLE 1.1.11 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY MAIN SOURCE/S OF INCOME 14 TABLE 1.1.12 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY MONTHLY INCOME 15 TABLE 1.1.13 POSSESSIONS 15 TABLE 2.0.1 AWARENESS OF STIS/STDS & HIV/AIDS 21 TABLE 2.0.2 AWARENESS OF SPECIFIC STIS/STDS 21 TABLE 2.0.3 RISKS OF IGNORING STI/STD SYMPTOMS 22 TABLE 2.0.4 MEASURES TO PROTECT ONESELF FROM CONTRACTING STIS/STDS 23 TABLE 2.0.5 PERCEIVED WAYS OF CONTRACTING HIV/AIDS 23 TABLE 2.0.6 PROTECTING YOURSELF FROM CONTRACTING HIV/AIDS 25 TABLE 2.0.7 TESTING FOR STIS/STDS 26 TABLE 2.0.8 WHERE VISIT TO BE TESTED FOR STIS/STDS 27 TABLE 2.0.9 WHY WOULD YOU CHOOSE THIS PLACE TO VISIT TO BE TESTED FOR STIS/STDS? 27 TABLE 2.0.10 PERSONALLY KNOWN SOMEONE WITH STIS/STDS OR HIV/AIDS 28 TABLE 2.0.11 KNOWLEDGE ITEMS 28 TABLE 2.1.1 EVER TESTED FOR STI/STD 33 TABLE 2.1.2 REASONS FOR NOT GETTING TESTED FOR STI/STD 33 TABLE 2.1.3 REASONS FOR GETTING TESTED FOR STI/STD 34 TABLE 2.1.4 MOST RECENT STI/STD TEST 34 TABLE 2.1.5 NUMBER OF TIMES TESTED FOR AN STI/STD 34 TABLE 2.1.6 RECEIVED THE RESULTS OF STI/STD TEST 35 TABLE 2.1.7 EVER TESTED FOR HIV 35 TABLE 2.1.8 MOST RECENT HIV TEST 35 TABLE 2.1.9 LOCATION OF MOST RECENT HIV TEST 36 TABLE 2.1.10 RECEIVED THE RESULTS OF HIV TEST 36 vi TABLE 2.1.11 NUMBER OF TIMES TESTED FOR HIV 36 TABLE 2.2.1 BELIEFS ABOUT SEXUAL PARTNERS 42 TABLE 2.2.2 BELIEFS ABOUT WHO SHOULD CARRY CONDOMS 42 TABLE 2.2.3 RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND SEX 43 TABLE 2.2.4 MEDIA PROMOTING SEXUAL PROMISCUITY 43 TABLE 2.2.5 BELIEFS ABOUT CONTRACTING AN STI/STD 43 TABLE 2.2.6 TREATMENT OF PERSONS WITH STIS/STDS 44 TABLE 2.2.7 EFFECT ON CHILDREN WHO ARE FORCED TO HAVE SEX WITH AN ADULT 44 TABLE 2.2.8 ACCEPTANCE OF HOMOSEXUALITY BY POPULATION 44 TABLE 2.2.9 RISKS OF CONTRACTING AN STI/STD 45 TABLE 2.3.1 FREQUENCY OF SEXUAL INTERCOURSE 52 TABLE 2.3.2 USE OF ALCOHOL OR DRUGS PRIOR TO HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE 52 TABLE 2.3.3 SEX ACTS ENGAGED IN 53 TABLE 2.3.4 OTHER SEX ACTS ENGAGED IN 53 TABLE 2.3.5 FORCED TO ENGAGE IN SEX ACTS 54 TABLE 2.3.6 CONDOM USE 54 TABLE 2.3.7 AGE OF FIRST SEXUAL ENCOUNTER AND THE AGE OF PARTNER 55 TABLE 2.3.8 NUMBER OF SEXUAL PARTNERS 56 TABLE 2.4.1 SEXUAL ATTRACTION 61 TABLE 2.4.2 DEFINITION OF SEXUAL ATTRACTION 61 TABLE 2.4.3 ATTITUDES TOWARD HOMOSEXUALITY 62 TABLE 2.4.4 EVALUATION OF HOMOSEXUALITY 62 TABLE 2.4.5 VIOLENCE BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION 63 TABLE 2.4.6 ACCESS THERAPY AND HEALTH SERVICES AS IT RELATES TO SEXUALITY 63 TABLE 2.5.1 OBTAIN A CONDOM WHEN NEEDED 71 TABLE 2.5.2 AWARE OF CONTRACEPTIVES & FAMILY PLANNING METHODS 71 TABLE 2.5.3 OBTAIN OTHER CONTRACEPTIVES WHEN NEEDED 71 TABLE 2.5.4 LOCATION TO ACCESS CONTRACEPTIVES OTHER THAN CONDOMS 72 TABLE 2.5.5 USE OF FAMILY PLANNING 72 TABLE 2.5.6 REASON FOR USING FAMILY PLANNING 73 TABLE 2.5.7 ACCESS FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES 73 TABLE 2.5.8 DISCUSSED FAMILY PLANNING WITH PARTNER 73 TABLE 2.5.9 KNOW PERSON/S WHO HAVE HAD AN ABORTION 74 TABLE 2.5.10 HAVE HAD OR CONSIDERED HAVING AN ABORTION 74 TABLE 2.5.11 LEGALIZING ABORTION 74 vii TABLE 2.6.1 CONDOM AND OTHER CONTRACEPTIVE USE 78 TABLE 2.6.2 SEXUAL ACTS 79 TABLE 2.7.1 MEDIA EXPOSURE 82 TABLE 2.7.2 TYPE OF SEX ACTS AND MEDIA EXPOSURE 82 TABLE 2.7.3 SEX TOYS AND MEDIA EXPOSURE 83 TABLE 2.7.4 SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR AND MEDIA EXPOSURE 83 viii ix SECTION I INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND SXM KABP 1.0: INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND SXM KABP 1.0: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Department of Social Development undertook a Knowledge, Attitude Behaviour and Perception (KABP) study on sex1, sexuality and family planning for the general population 18-59 years old. In addition to knowledge, attitude, behavior and perception, this study was also geared towards measuring the target group’s practices and reactions to sex, sexuality and family planning. QURE International a research company, was commissioned to undertake the KABP study of sex, sexuality and family planning among the population age 18-59 years old for the Ministry of Social Development under the Government of Sint Maarten. This study was coordinated by the Department of Social Development in collaboration with various executing agencies within the Ministry of Public Health, Social Development and Labor. RESEARCH GOAL The goal of this research was to investigate the knowledge, attitude, behavior and perception of sex, sexuality and family planning among the age groups 18-59 years old. The information provided from the investigation will be used to: 1. Develop policies geared towards increasing knowledge of sex, sexuality and family planning, 2. Strengthen of health care services to be in better alignment to the needs of the adult population ages 18-59 years old. 3. Ensure that sex, sexuality and family planning information and instruments (condoms, birth control) are more readily available and easily accessible. 4. Increase positive attitudes about sex, sexuality and family planning, heightened protection and family planning behavior and a more informed, tolerant and positive perception of sex, sexuality and family planning. The latter is to be fostered through publishing the report and awareness/sensitization campaigns.
Recommended publications
  • Abstracts [PDF | 206.9 K.O. ]
    Scientific Meeting between Pôle Suds-Ceped-Unige Progress in Access to Abortion in Restrictive Contexts: Historical and International Perspectives Tuesday, December 8th, 2015 First Session: Strategies to improve access to abortion in legally restrictive contexts Safe abortion outside of the law in the northeast of the Caribbean Gail Pheterson - Yamila Azize Small island exigencies and a legacy of colonial jurisprudence set the stage for this three-year study in 2001–2003 of abortion practice on several islands of the northeast Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua, St Kitts, St Martin and Sint Maarten. Based on in-depth interviews with 26 physicians, 16 of whom were performing abortions, it found that licensed physicians are routinely providing abortions in contravention of the law, and that those services, tolerated by governments and legitimised by European norms, are clearly the mainstay of abortion care on these islands. Medical abortion was being used both under medical supervision and through self-medication. Women travelled to find anonymous services, and also to access a particular method, provider or facility. Sometimes they settled for a less acceptable method if they could not afford a more comfortable one. Significantly, legality was not the main determinant of choice. Most abortion providers accepted the current situation as satisfactory. However, our findings suggest that restrictive laws were hindering access to services and compromising quality of care. Whereas doctors may have the liberty and knowledge to practise illegal abortions, women have no legal right to these services. Interviews suggest that an increasing number of women are self-inducing abortions with misoprostol to avoid doctors, high fees and public stigma.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion at Or Over 20 Weeks' Gestation
    Abortion At or Over 20 Weeks’ Gestation: Frequently Asked Questions Matthew B. Barry, Coordinator Section Research Manager April 30, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45161 Abortion At or Over 20 Weeks’ Gestation: Frequently Asked Questions Summary Legislation at the federal and state levels seeking to limit or ban abortions in midpregnancy has focused attention on the procedure and the relatively small number of women who choose to undergo such an abortion. According to the Guttmacher Institute, about 926,200 abortions were performed in 2014; 1.3% of abortions were performed at or over 21 weeks’ gestation in 2013. A 2018 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine study found that most women who have abortions are unmarried (86%), are poor or low-income (75%), are under age 30 (72%), and are women of color (61%). Stages of Pregnancy and Abortion Procedures A typical, full-term pregnancy spans 40 weeks, separated into trimesters: first trimester (week 1 through week 13), second trimester (week 14 through week 27), and third trimester (week 28 through birth). Abortion in the second trimester can be performed either by using a surgical procedure or by using drugs to induce labor. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2014 a surgical method was used for 98.8% of U.S. abortions at 14-15 weeks’ gestation, 98.4% at 16-17 weeks, 96.6% at 18-20 weeks, and 90.2% at 21 weeks or later. Proposed Legislation Related to Abortion Legislation in the 115th Congress, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Evidence, Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention in Latin America and the Caribbean
    International Interagency Meeting: Current Evidence, Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention in Latin America and the Caribbean March 17-19, 2014 Managua, Nicaragua Internationa FINAL REPORT 0 TABLE OF CONTENT Acronyms ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….……………………………………….. 5 II. Meeting Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 III. Shared prosperity and adolescent pregnancy ……………………………………………………………. 8 IV. Panel 1: Current Situation of Adolescent Pregnancy and its Major Risk Factors and Social Determinants in the LAC Region …………………………………. 9 V. Panel 2: Strategies oF Sexual and Reproductive Health oF Adolescents, Including the Prevention oF Teen Pregnancy …………………………………………. 13 VI. Special Presentation: Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Using the Health Impact Pyramid ……………………………………………………………………………….. 16 VII. Panel 3: Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Addressing the Socio-economic Determinants to Prevent Teen Pregnancies ……………………………... 18 VIII. Panel 4: Strengthening the Regulatory Environment to Prevent Teen Pregnancy ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20 IX. Special Presentation: Current Evidence in First and Second Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention ……………………………………………………………………………. 23 X. Panel 5A: State oF the Art in Comprehensive Sexual Education and Community Interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean …………………………. 25 XI. Panel 5B. State oF the Art in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Services ……………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 Edition
    Issue Brief April 2021 | No. IF19E01 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 Edition Key Points n the 46th memorial of Roe v. Wade, New York In 2019, Illinois and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law the repealed existing laws that protect infants that survive Reproductive Health Act which repealed legal abortion, setting off a national O debate about medical care for protections for infants who survive abortion.1 The celebration abortion survivors. of this law in New York City, followed by comments by Virginia Governor Ralph Northam which seemed to endorse Currently, federal law does not ensure that each infant that infanticide, launched the question of born-alive abortion survives an abortion is given survivors into the conscience of America. proper medical care, despite 77 percent of Americans supporting these policies. Congress and state legislatures across the country have responded to these radical positions by putting forth legislation This issue affects real people. In only nine states that require to protect infants who survive abortion. However, Democrat reporting on abortion survivors, 203 cases of infants that politicians have blocked efforts in Congress and in state survived an abortion have been reported. legislatures to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act which requires that life-saving medical care be given to babies born alive after failed abortion attempts. In This report can be read online at frc.org/bornalive 801 G. St. NW Washington, D.C. 20001 | frc.org | (202) 323-2100 Born-Alive Abortion Survivors: Just the Facts April 2021 | No. IF19E01 2019, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to bring this bill up for a vote in the House over 80 times, and Democrat Governors in North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Montana all vetoed similar legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion and the Law of Innocence
    ZIEGLER.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 8/9/21 6:26 PM ABORTION AND THE LAW OF INNOCENCE Mary Ziegler* As states pass increasingly strict abortion laws in a bid to reverse Roe v. Wade, abortion opponents have suddenly abandoned exceptions for cases of rape and incest. Developing the first legal history of rape and in- cest exceptions, this Article argues that these exceptions open a window into issues of guilt and innocence that define the constitutional jurispru- dence of abortion. In recognizing a right to abortion, the Court portrayed women as vic- tims—of the physical burdens of pregnancy and societal forces governing parenthood. But as the history of the rape and incest debate shows, the rhetoric of guilt and innocence is central to the case to overturn Roe. Seek- ing to dismantle abortion rights, pro-life forces have proposed a hierarchy of innocence. This hierarchy describes guilt as inherently relative, not an absolute but a matter of degrees and comparison. In this hierarchy, fetal life is supremely innocent, regardless of the surrounding circumstances both because an unborn child lacks agency (and therefore responsibility for any decision) and because that child has not yet made any choices, good or bad, for which to be held accountable. As the history of the rape and incest exception reveals, ideas of guilt and innocence have already destabilized protection for abortion. To shore up constitutional protection, supporters of abortion rights have to portray women in a different light—as trustworthy and autonomous rather than vul- nerable to forces beyond their control. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium
    William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice Volume 20 (2013-2014) Issue 1 William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law: 2013 Special Issue: Reproductive Article 7 Justice December 2013 Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium Sybil Shainwald Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Repository Citation Sybil Shainwald, Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium, 20 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 123 (2013), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol20/iss1/7 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl REPRODUCTIVE INJUSTICE IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM SYBIL SHAINWALD* INTRODUCTION I. COMMON LAW, THE EARLY STATUTES, AND THE EMBERS OF REFORM A. Legal Abortions (c. 1250–1803) B. Abortion Becomes a Crime: The Birth of Anti-Abortion Legislation (1803–1900) C. Abortion is Illegal (1900–1960) II. THE TIDE CHANGES A. The Liberalization Movement (1960–1973) B. The Decision in Roe and its Aftermath (1973–1982) C. Twenty-Five Years of Legal Abortions (1982–2007) III. A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RECENT STATE RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION RIGHTS CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION Recent attempts to curb abortion rights through enactment of new, restrictive regulations have sparked fresh debate, and the need to learn from history, rather than be “condemned to repeat it.”1 Forty- three new abortion restrictions were passed by nineteen states in 2012.2 The previous year, a staggering ninety-two restrictions were * Sybil Shainwald graduated from the College of William & Mary (B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICA: How Legislative Overreach Is Turning Reproductive Rights Into Criminal Wrongs Copyright © 2021 National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
    ABORTION IN AMERICA: How Legislative Overreach Is Turning Reproductive Rights Into Criminal Wrongs Copyright © 2021 National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/. It may be reproduced, provided that no charge is imposed, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) is acknowledged as the original publisher and the copyright holder. For any other form of reproduction, please contact NACDL. For more information contact: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers® 1660 L Street NW, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20036 Phone 202-872-8600 www.NACDL.org/Foundation This publication is available online at www.NACDL.org/AbortionCrimReport ABORTION IN AMERICA: How Legislative Overreach Is Turning Reproductive Rights Into Criminal Wrongs Martín Antonio Sabelli President, NACDL San Francisco, CA Christopher W. Adams Immediate Past President, NACDL Charleston, SC Lisa M. Wayne President, NFCJ Denver, CO Norman L. Reimer Executive Director, NACDL & NFCJ Washington, DC Subcommittee of Women in Criminal Defense Committee Nina J. Ginsberg Alexandria, VA Lindsay A. Lewis New York, NY C. Melissa “Missy” Owen Charlotte, NC CONTENTS About the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the NACDL Foundation for Criminal Justice . .1 Preface. 2 Foreword . 3 Acknowledgements ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Does Abortion Need Parental Consent in Singapore
    Does Abortion Need Parental Consent In Singapore Paralyzed Obie ensnares very movably while Shaun remains revertible and lyophilized. Kenyon is truthless: she decelerate joylessly and metallizing her baker. Over Levy usually tubs some wearers or mortify ostensively. Apply to the related infections such as such hospitals refuse to parental consent The consent in favor of these data. Of utmost importance is satisfy the clinician to blaze the fair possible year for certain adolescent. While my state requires parental consent for contraception the abortion laws for. How does not in singapore medical problems to consent or in singapore abortion among us to children and needs. Most circumstance these abortions were second pregnancies. A daughter who can been resident in Singapore for those least 4 months. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Laborimprisonment, practices that provided adequate deterrence. During the provision and a termination of countries should be getting pregnant woman has to perform covered in controlling authority customer service research to consent in abortion need parental notification on minority rights? She needs emergency team and her parents are staff available. Laws and policies that require parental consent for minors to access testing for. All parents need parental consent for family life does not needed for? Retirement: What world I Do can Protect Them, create Future remember My Future? Another correlate with these data input that complications may be another consequence for both induced and spontaneous abortions. Discrimination limited right to have these and incest as with only have? Abortions in singapore on parental consent. The pregnancy rates of marriage law has focused on bioethics of autonomy as measured by, i eligible for medical examination of individuals and read.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of This Submission from Reproductive Rights and Justice
    May 21, 2019 Working Group on Discrimination against Women in Law and Practice c/o OHCHR-UNOG Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Palais Wilson 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Dear Members of the UN Working Group on Discrimination against Women: The purpose of this submission from reproductive rights and justice organizations is to detail the developments in the United States regarding reproductive rights and justice since the Working Group’s visit to the U.S. in 2015. As reflected in this follow-up report, the United States has failed to implement recommendations made the Working Group at the conclusion of its visit. In addition, since 2015, the political and policy landscape in the United States for women’s rights, including reproductive rights, has worsened considerably, resulting in a significant retrogression of rights. In submitting this follow-up report, we respectfully urge the Working Group to note concern with the retrogression surrounding the reproductive rights law and policy landscape in the United States and remind the U.S. of its obligations to ensure women’s rights to equality and non- discrimination and their rights to reproductive and sexual health. Sincerely, Center for Reproductive Rights City University of New York Law School, Human Rights & Gender Justice Clinic If/When/How: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice In Our Own Voice National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health Report to the UN Working Group on the Issue of Discrimination Against Women in Law and
    [Show full text]
  • Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales May 2010 Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales REPORT OF A WORKING PARTY May 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists © 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the publisher or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK [www.cla.co.uk]. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to the publisher at the UK address printed on this page. Registered names: The use of registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Product liability: Drugs and their doses are mentioned in this text. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained within this publication, neither the authors nor the publishers can accept liability for errors or omissions. The final responsibility for delivery of the correct dose remains with the physician prescribing and administering the drug. In every individual case the respective user must check current indications and accuracy by consulting other pharmaceutical literature and following the guidelines laid down by the manufacturers of specific products and the relevant authorities in the country in which they are practising.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Worldwide 2017: Uneven Progress and Unequal Access
    Uneven Progress and Unequal Access Uneven Progress and Unequal Access Susheela Singh Lisa Remez Gilda Sedgh Lorraine Kwok Tsuyoshi Onda Acknowledgments his report was written by Susheela Singh, Lisa San Francisco, and Fundación Oriéntame and TRemez, Gilda Sedgh, Lorraine Kwok and Tsuyoshi Fundación Educación para la Salud Reproductiva Onda—all of the Guttmacher Institute. It was (USA and Colombia); Ilana Dzuba, Gynuity (USA); edited by Jared Rosenberg; Michael Moran and Katy Footman, Marie Stopes International (UK); Kathleen Randall were responsible for production. Diana Greene Foster, University of California, San Francisco; Beth Fredrick, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg The authors thank the following Guttmacher School of Public Health (USA); Chimaroake colleagues for their comments and help in Izugbara, African Population and Health Research developing this report: Akinrinola Bankole, Sneha Centre (Kenya); Shireen Jejeebhoy, Independent Barot, Onikepe Owolabi, Ann Starrs and Gustavo Researcher (India); Katherine Mayall, Center for Suarez, for reviewing a draft of the report; Jonathan Reproductive Rights (USA); Ndola Prata, University Bearak, for invaluable assistance with data; Suzette of California, Berkeley; Mahesh Puri, Center for Audam and Mia Zolna, for data analysis; Alanna Research on Environment, Health and Population Galati, Rachel Jones, Elizabeth Nash and Anna Activities (Nepal); Mónica Roa, Independent Popinchalk, for providing follow-up data; and Alex Consultant (Colombia); Zeba Sathar, Population Arpaia for research support. They
    [Show full text]
  • 26Th Annual AMSA Poster Session
    26th Annual AMSA Poster Session ABSTRACT BOOKLET MARCH 6, 2021 | 4:30PM ET Contents Welcome…………………………………………………………………………….ii Abstracts Award Winners…………………………………………………………………………..1 Abortion-related and Reproductive Justice Projects………………………………...11 AMSA Academy Scholars Programs and Institutes………………………………….31 Basic and Translational Science……………………………………………………….42 Chapter Activities……………………………………………………………………....52 Community Development and Service Projects…………………………………...….62 Curriculum Development and Educational Projects………………………………....77 Patient-Oriented and Epidemiology………………………………………………...…99 i. Welcome It was our pleasure to welcome you to the 26th Annual American Medical Student Association (AMSA) Poster Session. AMSA, along with our sponsors at ScholarRx, Kaplan MCAT, and the AMSA Reproductive Health Project, was delighted to host this year’s Poster Session in an entirely virtual format. We had one of our biggest programs to date, with 129 accepted abstracts in 7 categories: Abortion-related and Reproductive Justice Projects AMSA Academy Scholars Programs and Institutes Basic and Translational Science Chapter Activities Community Development and Service Projects Curriculum Development and Educational Projects Patient-Oriented and Epidemiology We would like to thank the volunteer judges who kindly lent their time in providing feedback and evaluations, both on the day of the Poster Session and prior to the event: Alex Tan, Ali Bokhari, Alison Case, Aliye Runyan, Betsy Brookins, Christina Kelly, Isaiah Cochran, Janette Gomos Klein, Jeff Huebner, Jeff Koetje, Jessica Pan, Keanan McGonigle, Kelly Thibert, Mary Beth Levin, Matt Moy, Pavan Madan, Perry Tsai, Rachel Gordon, Tao Le, and Zuri Obado. We would also like to thank the AMSA National Leaders who served as Student Facilitators: Aisha Chaudhry, Eboni Peoples, Fiza Farrukh, Hannah Hendrix, Jason Fang, Karin Zikra, Laura Shepherd, Peter Papaioannou, Puja Mohan, Robert Heusner, Thomas Pak, and Zoreed Mukhtar.
    [Show full text]