DOCSLIB.ORG

Behind Their Screens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Behind Their Screens Investigating an Incel community online BEHIND THEIR SCREENS M.C. Escher, litho, January 1935. Caroline Joubert S2073226 Total word count: 23 583 Master Thesis Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Drs Daan Weggemans, for his invaluable help along each stage of the thesis project and all the fruitful leads he gave me to work on. He might have been uncertain initially, whether my interest in this topic had sparked from a personal vendetta against men, but I hope I managed to convince him of a purely academic interest. I would like to thank my dear friend Natalie, who tirelessly re-read my chapters and helped me hand in a thesis written in a correct English. I would like to thank my parents who in addition to paying for my tuition fee, were always present in moments of doubts, my brother who helped me with computer issues, my boyfriend who cooked me food and all my friends who went through tough thesis times with me. More seriously, writing a thesis can feel a little hopeless at times, and I feel so lucky to have been surrounded by all these wonderful people to keep me motivated. Finally, I would like to warmly thank Leiden University for accepting me to their CSM program, because I would not have been able to study such an interesting topic without this Master’s degree. I hope you will find it an interesting read, Caroline 1 Table of Content Chapter I: Introducing Incels .................................................................................................. 6 1.1. Introduction to the research ............................................................................................. 6 1.2. History of the Problem ...................................................................................................... 7 1.3. Statement of the Problem ................................................................................................. 9 1.4. Research Question and Approach ................................................................................... 10 1.5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 11 2. Chapter II: Incels – What is it all about? ...................................................................... 13 2.2. Related movements ........................................................................................................ 14 2.2.1. History of the manosphere ....................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2. The manosphere ...................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.3. The manosphere and the Web ................................................................................................. 16 2.3. The origins of Incels ......................................................................................................... 19 2.3.1. The concept of ‘involuntary celibacy’ ........................................................................................ 19 2.3.2. The concept of “Incel” .............................................................................................................. 20 2.4. Who are the Incels today? ............................................................................................... 20 2.4.1. Incels according to ‘normies’ .................................................................................................... 20 2.4.2. A way out? ............................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.3. Incels and the alt-right ............................................................................................................. 23 2.5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 24 3. Chapter III: What does it mean to be part of a digital community?............................. 26 Internet as a social phenomenon ........................................................................................ 26 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 26 3.2. A community? ................................................................................................................. 27 3.3. What changed with the Internet? ................................................................................... 28 3.4. What does the Internet do? ............................................................................................ 29 3.5. Internet’s impact on the radical milieu ........................................................................... 32 3.6. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 34 4. Chapter IV: A methodological approach to Incels ........................................................ 36 2 4.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 36 4.2. Research Focus ................................................................................................................ 36 4.3. Digital ethnography......................................................................................................... 38 4.4. Content Analysis ............................................................................................................. 40 4.5. Procedure ........................................................................................................................ 42 4.1. Categories ....................................................................................................................... 43 4.2. Delimitations ................................................................................................................... 45 4.3. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 46 5. Chapter V: An immersion on Incels.me ........................................................................ 47 5.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 47 5.2. Background characteristics of Incels ............................................................................... 47 5.3. What do they post about?............................................................................................... 51 5.3.1. Personal sharing....................................................................................................................... 53 5.3.2. Posts fostering interaction with other users ............................................................................. 55 5.3.3. Display of animosity towards women ....................................................................................... 56 5.3.4. Theorizing the Blackpill ............................................................................................................ 57 5.3.5. Sharing their experience as Incels ............................................................................................. 57 5.3.6. Related to the logistics of the forum ......................................................................................... 57 5.3.7. Suicide/depression related ....................................................................................................... 58 5.3.8. Interactions with other groups ................................................................................................. 58 5.3.9. Display of animosity towards other men................................................................................... 58 5.3.10. Lifefuel ................................................................................................................................ 59 5.3.11. Other .................................................................................................................................. 59 5.3.12. Need to leave ...................................................................................................................... 59 5.4. First reflection on the category analysis .......................................................................... 59 5.5. Incels and self-journalism ................................................................................................ 60 5.6. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 60 6. Chapter VI – Reflecting on the dimensions .................................................................. 62 6.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 62 6.2. Larger dimensions existing on the forum ........................................................................ 62 6.2.1. Social Dimension ...................................................................................................................... 63 3 6.2.2. Ideological Dimension .............................................................................................................. 64 6.2.3. Counter-narrative Dimension ................................................................................................... 65 6.2.4. Other
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Philosophical Perspective on Constructing Active Masculinities
    Feminist Philosophy Quarterly Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 2 Care and the Self: A Philosophical Perspective on Constructing Active Masculinities Iva Apostolova Dominican University College, [email protected] Elaina Gauthier-Mamaril Aberdeen University, [email protected] Recommended Citation Apostolova, Iva and Elaina Gauthier-Mamaril. "Care and the Self: A Philosophical Perspective on Constructing Active Masculinities." Feminist Philosophy Quarterly4, (1). Article 2. Apostolova and Gauthier-Mamaril: Care and the Self: Caring Masculinities Care and the Self: A Philosophical Perspective on Constructing Active Masculinities Iva Apostolova and Élaina Gauthier-Mamaril Abstract Our paper focuses on the philosophical perspective of constructing active (as opposed to reactive) caring masculine agencies in the contemporary feminist discourse. Since contemporary feminisms are not simply anti-essentialist but, more importantly, polyphonic, we believe that it is far more appropriate to talk about ‘masculinities’ as opposed to ‘masculinity.’ We are proposing a revised understanding of the self in which the self is not defined primarily in the dichotomous, categorical one-other relationship. We use Paul Ricoeur’s anthropology to describe the self as relational, as well as Joan Tronto’s recent perspective on care, which fits well with a Ricoeurian reconstruction of the self. We also engage with Raewyn Connell’s discourse on masculinity and, more specifically, hegemonic masculinity. By using ‘caring masculine agencies’ as an alternative to ‘masculinity as reactive anti-femininity,’ we are proposing a paradigm shift that hopefully is flexible enough to respect the dynamism inherent to any act of gender- identification. Keywords: hegemonic masculinities, reactive masculinities, active/caring masculinities, ethics of care, relational self Our research aims at opening a new narrative space for masculinity within a feminist context.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassie Jaye's Red Pill Too Truthful for Feminists to Tolerate
    Cassie Jaye’s Red Pill too truthful for feminists to tolerate Cassie Jaye at the world premiere of The Red Pill earlier this month. Picture: Ian Stroud Bettina Arndt, The Australian, 12:00AM October 29, 2016 “The Red Pill: The movie about men that feminists didn’t want you to see.” This was the provocative headline that ran in Britain’s The Telegraph last November, a teaser for a documentary made by a feminist filmmaker who planned to take on men’s rights activists but was won over and crossed to the dark side to take up their cause. Despite a ferocious campaign to stop the movie being made, it’s finally been released and the Australian screening was due next week in Melbourne. However the gender warriors have struck again, using a change.com petition to persuade Palace Cinemas to cancel the booking. Palace took the decision after being told the movie would offend many in its core audience but by yesterday 8000 had signed petitions protesting the ban. Organisers are now scrambling to find another venue. Clearly this documentary has the feminists very worried — with good reason. Cassie Jaye is an articulate, 29-year-old blonde whose previous movies on gay marriage and abstinence education won multiple awards. But then she decided to interview leaders of the Men’s Rights Movement for a documentary she was planning about rape culture on American campuses. As a committed feminist, Jaye expected to be unimpressed by these renowned hate-filled misogynists, but to her surprise she was exposed to a whole range of issues she came to see as unfairly stacked against men and boys.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divergent Archive and Androcentric Counterpublics: Public Rhetorics, Memory, and Archives
    THE DIVERGENT ARCHIVE AND ANDROCENTRIC COUNTERPUBLICS: PUBLIC RHETORICS, MEMORY, AND ARCHIVES BY EVIN SCOTT GROUNDWATER DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2020 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Kelly Ritter, Chair Associate Professor Peter Mortensen Assistant Professor John Gallagher Associate Professor Jessica Enoch, University of Maryland ii ABSTRACT As a field, Writing Studies has long been concerned with the rhetorical representation of both dominant and marginalized groups. However, rhetorical theory on publics and counterpublics tends not to articulate how groups persuade others of their status as mainstream or marginal. Scholars of public/counterpublic theory have not yet adequately examined the mechanisms through which rhetorical resources play a role in reinforcing and/or dispelling public perceptions of dominance or marginalization. My dissertation argues many counterpublics locate and convince others of their subject status through the development of rhetorical resources. I contend counterpublics create and curate a diffuse system of archives, which I refer to as “divergent archives.” These divergent archives often lack institutional backing, rigor, and may be primarily composed of ephemera. Drawing from a variety of archival materials both within and outside institutionally maintained archives, I explore how counterpublics perceiving themselves as marginalized construct archives of their own as a way to transmit collective memories reifying their nondominant status. I do so through a case study that has generally been overlooked in Writing Studies: a collection of men’s rights movements which imagine themselves to be marginalized, despite their generally hegemonic positions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Machine Gun Hand: Robots, Performance, and American Ideology in the Twentieth Century
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2017 The aM chine Gun Hand: Robots, Performance, and American Ideology in the Twentieth Century Benjamin Michael Phelan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Phelan, Benjamin Michael, "The aM chine Gun Hand: Robots, Performance, and American Ideology in the Twentieth Century" (2017). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4469. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4469 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE MACHINE GUN HAND: ROBOTS, PERFORMANCE, AND AMERICAN IDEOLOGY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Theatre by Benjamin Michael Phelan B.A., Brigham Young University, 2008 August 2017 Acknowledgments First, I must thank my major professor, friend, and advisor, Alan Sikes. Without his insightful comments throughout the years, this dissertation would have never gained much shape or inertia. I cannot thank him enough for his love and support and for the hours of meetings at Garden District Coffee or over the phone, helping me formulate my ideas into concrete chapters. This dissertation would not have been possible without the generous support of numerous faculty at Louisiana State University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Panoptic Campus: How the University Watches Your Every Move / P
    The panoptic campus: how the university watches your every move / p. 13 ScoMo wants your urine: Down the rabbit hole: Macron: airy fluff for rich peo- what the 2017 budget means we watched the Red Pill ple or the saviour of European for students / p. 4 so you didn’t have to / p. 9 liberal centrism? / p. 10 S1W10 / FIRST PUBLISHED 1929 PUBLISHED S1W10 / FIRST HONI SOIT LETTERS Acknowledgement of Country Fan mail Got mail? Send your irreverent takes We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute amount red pocket money in a group and reverent rants to editors@ Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In Budget woes Hard pill to chat on Wechat, which to everyone recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to. We with a basic concept of how group honisoit.com by 12pm each recognise our duty to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media, and to adequately represent the perspectives of Indigenous students at Dear Editors, swallow chats on wechat work would know Friday for publication. Keep it our University. We also wholeheartedly thank our Indigenous reporters for the continuing contribution of their labour to our learning. it’s the payment for posting an adver- Like many, I am concerned with the fee What’s bizarre is that at this Uni- tisement in a group chat.
    [Show full text]
  • A Philosophical Perspective on Constructing Active Masculinities Iva Apostolova Dominican University College, [email protected]
    Feminist Philosophy Quarterly Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 2 Care and the Self: A Philosophical Perspective on Constructing Active Masculinities Iva Apostolova Dominican University College, [email protected] Elaina Gauthier-Mamaril Aberdeen University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Feminist Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Apostolova, Iva and Elaina Gauthier-Mamaril. "Care and the Self: A Philosophical Perspective on Constructing Active Masculinities." Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4, (1). Article 2. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Feminist Philosophy Quarterly by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Apostolova and Gauthier-Mamaril: Care and the Self: Caring Masculinities Care and the Self: A Philosophical Perspective on Constructing Active Masculinities Iva Apostolova and Élaina Gauthier-Mamaril Abstract Our paper focuses on the philosophical perspective of constructing active (as opposed to reactive) caring masculine agencies in the contemporary feminist discourse. Since contemporary feminisms are not simply anti-essentialist but, more importantly, polyphonic, we believe that it is far more appropriate to talk about ‘masculinities’ as opposed to ‘masculinity.’ We are proposing a revised understanding of the self in which the self is not defined primarily in the dichotomous, categorical one-other relationship. We use Paul Ricoeur’s anthropology to describe the self as relational, as well as Joan Tronto’s recent perspective on care, which fits well with a Ricoeurian reconstruction of the self.
    [Show full text]
  • Me Too Speciale
    Jeyakumar & Vad 1 Abstract In October 2017, the Me Too movement, originally founded in 2006 by Tarana Burke with the goal of ending sexual violence and helping survivors heal, reemerged in the wake of the sexual abuse allegations against Harvey Weinstein. The ‘Me Too’ phrase became a viral hashtag, and Me Too has since become a global phenomenon, which opened up a conversation about sexual violence around the world. The movement has been widely covered in the media, and the aim of this MA- thesis is to get a better understanding of how the media has reacted to it and perceived it, and how this has affected the movement. This MA-thesis revolves around the representation of the movement in four American news outlets: CNN, Fox News, The New York Times, and Breitbart News. The MA-thesis examines the following research question: How do these news outlets represent/frame the Me Too movement, and what effect does this have on the perception of it and the discourse surrounding sexual abuse? The data analyzed in this MA-thesis consist of news articles from four major American news outlets in order to get an idea about how the movement was represented in American media overall, rather than in just one news outlet. The four news outlets were selected on the basis of their different news profiles and thus on the assumption that each news outlet has a distinct way of covering news, which would allow us to compare them with each other. The MA-thesis employs two theories in a qualitative analysis of the news articles: Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis (CDA) and Theo van Leeuwen’s theory of social actor representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Boys Will Be Boys
    PRAISE FOR BOYS WILL BE BOYS ‘A damning look at toxic masculinity. It’s the most important thing you’ll read this year.’ Elle Australia ‘Boys Will Be Boys is a timely contribution to feminist literature. Her central point is clear and confronting, and it represents something of a challenge… Ferocious, incisive, an effective treatise.’ Australian Book Review ‘A piercing gaze at contemporary patriarchy, gendered oppression and toxic masculinity.’ Sydney Morning Herald ‘A truly vital piece of social commentary from Australia’s fiercest feminist, Boys Will Be Boys should be shoved into the hands of every person you know. Clementine Ford has done her research—despite what her angry detractors would have you believe—and spits truths about toxic masculinity and the dangers of the patriarchy with passion and a wonderfully wry sense of humour. Read it, learn from it, and share it—this book is absolute GOLD!’ AU Review, 16 Best Books of 2018 ‘Boys Will Be Boys is an impassioned call for societal change from a writer who has become a stand-out voice of her generation (and has the trolls to prove it) and an act of devotion from a mother to her son.’ Readings ‘With pithy jokes and witty commentary, this is an engrossing read, and Ford’s spirited tone evokes passion for change.’ Foreword Reviews ‘Clementine Ford reveals the fragility behind “toxic masculinity” in Boys Will Be Boys.’ The Conversation ‘Boys Will Be Boys highlights the need to refocus on how we’re raising our boys to be better men. The ingrained toxic masculinity within society does just as much damage to our boys as it does to our girls, and this book highlights how to change that.’ Fernwood Magazine PRAISE FOR FIGHT LIKE A GIRL ‘Her brilliant book could light a fire with its fury.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Counter-Feminist-Essays.Pdf
    What follows is a conceptual ecosystem masquerading as an e-book. Please share this with many humans, and encourage those to share with many more. Make it go pyramidal Illustration by Daniel Bailey What is the worst name you can call a feminist? A feminist How many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb? Three. One to hold the bulb, and two to make the world revolve around it When a feminist explains feminism to you, what are they really doing? Building a smokescreen Because feminism is NOT the world It©s just that simple DISCLAIMER You, the reader, are alone responsible for how you exploit the ideas contained in this work The author and his associates are not responsible for that. Neither is any third party, anywhere It©s all on you Have a care, and practice non-violence If you claim inspiration from this and yet compromise yourself, we will disavow you ~~~~~~~~ Heard something interesting? Doing something interesting? Just want to speak your mind a bit? We probably won©t reply, but all communications sent to the following will be looked into and thought about: [email protected] ~~~~~~~~ Live well and live free in the Liberty of the Non-feminist Sector The Counter-feminist Essays Reflections upon the feminist problem: What is feminism? Where do non-feminist people stand? What is to be done? by Fidelbogen ~~~~~~~ Dedication: to the Individual Current year 2020 C.E. or 2005 from the battle of the Teutoberg Forest Published under Creative Commons 3.0 This book may be non-commercially distributed at will provided the text is not altered and author attribution is retained.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Mining to Understand Gender Issues Stories from the Red Pill Men's Rights and Feminism Movements
    Text Mining to Understand Gender Issues: Stories from The Red Pill, Men's Rights, and Feminism Movements by Abeer Khan A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Mathematics in Computer Science Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2019 c Abeer Khan 2019 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Addressing gender issues has become important worldwide. The United Nations (UN) endorses big data projects as a valuable tool to monitor its gender-related development goals. In this thesis, we first motivate the examination of The Red Pill, Men's Rights, and Feminism movements to identify gender issues. We present data-mining methodologies to analyze over 40,000 posts and 2 billion comments that were made on social media in relation to these social movements. Specifically, we examine the themes these movements discuss and their perspectives on them. We also analyze the people involved with these movements, by comparing their discussions and interests with other online communities. Our analysis leads to three main findings. First, gender movements discuss workplace sexism, personal safety, rape, and legal issues among other gender issues, and different movements often have different perspectives on these issues. Second, people involved with the Men's Rights movement are similar to people who are politically right-leaning and associated with sexist or racist content, whereas people involved with the Feminism movement are similar to those who are politically left-leaning, support minorities, body acceptance, and survivors of sexual assault.
    [Show full text]
  • Men Pay a Steep Price When It Comes to Masculinity Alia E
    Men pay a steep price when it comes to masculinity Alia E. Dastagir, USA TODAYPublished 2:22 p.m. ET March 31, 2017 | Updated 11:43 p.m. ET March 31, 2017 Analysis: Some say "the future is female." But what does the future for men look like? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/31/masculinity-traditional-toxic-trump-mens- rights/99830694/ A scandal that began this month with Marines sharing sexually explicit photos of female colleagues on social media, and expanded to include photos of male service members on gay pornography sites, cannot be blamed on a sexist military subculture alone, but rather on the broader culture of American men. Comments on the women's photos were said to be degrading and alluded to rape. At least some of the photos of the men in uniform — including ones where they're engaged in sex — were shared without their consent. It's a power play — an example of what many call "toxic masculinity." The stereotypical sense of masculinity is at war with everything we know about what it means to be human. It’s muted suffering, even when we know talking through trauma is important for healing. It’s not expressing physical affection for other men, including male children, even though we know human touch is central to emotional well-being.It’s filthy jokes, flaunting sexual conquests and insecurity disguised as bravado. It’s being taught that power is dominating others, rather than treating people as the full humans they are. For this, men pay a steep price.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Misandry, Miss Angry?
    ‘What are little girls made of? - Sugar and spice, and all things nice. What are little boys made of? - Slugs and snails, and puppy-dogs’ tails’. Old English nursery rhyme ‘If feminism meant ignoring boys falling behind at school and telling girls to fear members of their own families as well as half their classmates, then it wasn’t something I wanted anything to do with.’ Joanna Williams, critic of victim / grievance / radical / gender feminism ‘’If you want to know who rules over you, look at who you are not allowed to criticize’ Stefan Molyneux, walking truth bomb. Second-Sexism Most people put people before politics. ‘Heredity cannot be allowed to have acted any part in history’. But some people put politics before people. Alfred Kroeber, social scientist From time to time they come to dominate democratic politics. All they need to create a new religion is to sell some ‘Big Lies’, such as: • We are born as ‘blank slates’, upon which we can choose what to write. • Men are monsters, because of a ‘male-dominated’ culture. • Masculinity is a pathological state. • ‘Patriarchy’ is a bad thing. • Truth is ‘male’ and must therefore be ignored. • Women will be ‘safe’ if boys are raised more like girls. • Anyone who questions any of this is ’sexist’. The weight of evidence from science, history, evolution and anthropology vastly contradicts these presuppositions. Yet these articles of faith are held with religious zeal, and, like the worst of religions, this zeal persecutes the truth. Boys are now raised to feel ashamed of who they are, the second sex.
    [Show full text]