DOCSLIB.ORG

Opportunity Through Diversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Opportunity Through Diversity FINAL PROGRAM OppORTUNITY through DIVERSITY AAPOR 65th Annual Conference May 13-16, 2010 Chicago Marriott Downtown Magnificent Mile Chicago, IL WAPOR 63rd Annual Conference May 11–13, 2010 The Avenue Hotel | Chicago, IL www.aapor.org AAPOR 65th Annual Conference May 13-16, 2010 Chicago Marriott Downtown Magnificent Mile Chicago, IL ANNUAL CONFERENCE WAPOR 63rd Annual Conference May 11–13, 2010 The Avenue Hotel | Chicago, IL Table of Contents Welcome to Chicago, Illinois ..................................................................................5 General Meeting Information...........................................................................7 – 9 AAPOR Executive Council ..........................................................................10 – 13 Chapter Presidents ................................................................................................13 Past Presidents ......................................................................................................14 WAPOR Executive Council ................................................................................15 Honorary Life Members .......................................................................................16 Executive Office Staff ...........................................................................................17 Committees/Task Forces ..............................................................................18 – 24 Committee Meetings & Social Activities .....................................................25 – 26 Networking Opportunities ...................................................................................26 Schedule of Events ........................................................................................27 – 29 Award Winners .............................................................................................30 – 31 Conference Sponsors ....................................................................................32 – 33 Exhibitor Listing & Exhibit Hall Floor Plan ...............................................34 – 36 Endowment Fund Contributors ...........................................................................37 Blue Book Supporters ..................................................................................38 – 40 www.aapor.org Final Program 3 AAPOR 65th Annual Conference Table of Contents WEDNESDAY, MAY 12 Wednesday Day-at-a-Glance ...............................................................................42 Wednesday Schedule of Events ...................................................................43 – 49 Note Pages .....................................................................................................50 – 51 THURSDAY, MAY 13 Thursday Day-at-a-Glance ...........................................................................53 – 55 Thursday Schedule of Events .......................................................................57 – 83 Note Pages .....................................................................................................84 – 85 FRIDAY, MAY 14 Friday Day-at-a-Glance ................................................................................87 – 89 Friday Schedule of Events..........................................................................91 – 126 Note Pages .................................................................................................127 – 128 SATURDAY, MAY 15 Saturday Day-at-a-Glance........................................................................129 – 131 Saturday Schedule of Events ...................................................................133 – 159 Note Pages .................................................................................................160 – 161 SUNDAY, MAY 16 Sunday Day-at-a-Glance ..........................................................................163 – 164 Sunday Schedule of Events ......................................................................165 – 179 Note Pages .................................................................................................180 – 181 Advertisements ..........................................................................................182 – 201 Save the Date – AAPOR Future Conferences ..................................................202 Index ..........................................................................................................203 – 216 Meeting Room Floor Plans ....................................................................217 – 223 4 Final Program www.aapor.org WAPOR 63rd Annual Conference Greetings! Welcome to Chicago! And thank you for attending the 65th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). Your participation in and contributions to this annual gathering are deeply appreciated! We have an outstanding program this year and our location on the Magnificent Mile could not be better. This year’s conference theme, “Opportunity Through Diversity” recognizes the many ways in which AAPOR, society and our profession have changed over time. While diversity can present challenges, it also offers great opportunity: • The populations we study: Global interconnectivity increases interaction between diverse peoples. Learning from different races, cultures and backgrounds is vital to our profession. • The data we collect: Demand for opinion, attitudinal, belief and behavioral data is greater than ever, extending to a broader range of issues, including health, politics, education, technology use and media consumption. • The methods we employ: Researchers have a far greater range of data collection tools and approaches than at any point in the history of survey research. Yet we have much to learn. • The city in which we meet: Like AAPOR, our host city of Chicago reflects the strength, vibrancy and purpose associated with diverse peoples coming together to form a community. Our final program features discussions and research debates that appeal to diverse intellectual tastes. The papers, panels, posters and briefs reflect the depth and breadth of our research endeavors and the vibrancy of our association. We have also transformed our exhibit space into an “AAPOR village,” with a host of activities including research posters, the book exhibit, author small group discussions and an interesting mix of vendors and exhibitors. Be sure to visit the AAPOR Historical Exhibit and the AAPOR membership booth. (And don’t forget the dessert breaks!) www.aapor.org Final Program 5 AAPOR 65th Annual Conference Our conference offers a unique social forum for AAPOR members. We offer an array of activities, including the Annual Golf Outing (Thursday), New Member / All Chapter Reception and post-Plenary Dessert Reception (Thursday) and on Saturday we start the day with the Fun Run/Walk and end with the President’s Reception, Awards Banquet and Applied Probability Session. We believe that you will find the next few days rewarding, informative and thought-provoking. And remember to enjoy the sights and sounds of the Second City and the Magnificent Mile! Michael W. Link Robert L. Santos Conference Chair Associate Conference Chair About AAPOR Founded in 1947, AAPOR is a professional society of individuals engaged in public opinion research, market research and social policy research. Our membership includes people from all sectors of the research community: academic institutions, commercial organizations, government agencies and non-profit organizations. 6 Final Program www.aapor.org WAPOR 63rd Annual Conference General Information The AAPOR Registration Desk is located on the 7th floor of the Chicago Marriott Downtown Magnificent Mile. Hours: Wednesday, May 12 4:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Thursday, May 13 7:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Friday, May 14 7:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Saturday, May 15 7:30 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. Sunday, May 16 8:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. The WAPOR Registration Desk is located on the 2nd floor of the Avenue Hotel. Hours: Tuesday, May 11 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Wednesday, May 12 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Thursday, May 13 8:00 a.m. – Noon Badges Participation in the Annual Conference is limited to registered delegates. The official conference badge is required for admission to all sessions, social activities and the exhibit hall. If there is an error on your badge, have it corrected at the registration desk. Meal Tickets Tickets will be collected at each core meal function. Be sure to bring your ticket with you. Speaker Materials Presenters who plan to use PowerPoint® and the data projector must bring their presentation on a flash drive or CD-ROM to the AV Technician at the Registration Desk area 24 hours prior to their session or earlier. The presentations will be loaded onto the computer in the designated meeting room. Conference Materials The Final Program and abstracts are available on the flash drives in each attendee’s tote bag, sponsored by ICF MACRO. Messages A message board will be maintained in the registration area during registration hours. www.aapor.org Final Program 7 AAPOR 65th Annual Conference Highlights Education – Short Courses Six short courses are offered to enhance your learning experience. The course offerings include: Course 1: Weighting Survey Data - Advanced Course 2: Multilingual, Multicultural & Multinational (3M) Survey Design Methods: Introduction Course 3: Multilingual, Multicultural & Multinational (3M) Survey Design Methods: Applied Course 4: The Benefits & Challenges of Address-Based Sampling Designs Course 5: Multilevel Analysis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book Spring 2006.Qxd
    Why? Recent psychological research sheds new light on this issue. A growing number of experiments show that judgments of beauty and judgments of truth share a common Norbert Schwarz characteristic: People make them, in part, by attending to the dynamics of on judgments of their own information processing. truth & beauty When an object is easy to perceive, people evaluate it as more beautiful Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/daed/article-pdf/135/2/136/1829119/daed.2006.135.2.136.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 than when it is dif½cult to perceive; similarly, when a statement is easy to process, people are more likely to ac- cept it as true than when it is dif½cult to process. Psychologists refer to the ease or dif½culty of information pro- cessing as ‘processing fluency.’ Its shared role in judgments of beauty and Poets and scientists alike often assume truth renders it likely that we ½nd the that beauty and truth are two sides of same stimulus beautiful as well as true. the same coin.* From John Keats’s fa- In an influential series of experiments, mous assertion that “beauty is truth, Robert Zajonc observed in the 1960s that truth beauty” to Richard Feynman’s the more often his participants saw un- belief that “you can recognize truth known graphical stimuli, like Chinese by its beauty and simplicity,” beauty ideographs, the more appealing they has often been offered as a heuristic found them. Later research traced this for assessing truth. Yet the history of ½nding to the role of processing fluen- science is full of beautiful theories cy.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Julie Y. Huang
    CURRICULUM VITAE JULIE Y. HUANG College of Business Office: Harriman 319 Stony Brook University Email: [email protected] Stony Brook, NY 11794-3775 APPOINTMENTS Associate Professor of Marketing, 2020-present College of Business, Stony Brook University Assistant Professor of Marketing, College of Business, Stony Brook University 2014-2020 Post-Doctoral Fellow and Lab Manager, 2011-2014 Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto EDUCATION Ph.D. Yale University, Social Psychology 2011 M.S. Yale University, Social Psychology 2007 B.A. University of Maryland, Psychology and English 2003 AWARDS, HONORS, AND GRANTS Stony Brook Trustees Faculty Award, $20 000, Stony Brook Foundation 2019 Transformative Consumer Research Grant, $2025, Association for Consumer Research 2019 Elected Member, Society for Experimental Social Psychology 2017 NCID Exemplary Diversity Scholar, University of Michigan 2011 Finalist, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholars 2010 Fellowship, Summer Institute in Social Psychology 2009 Phillip G. Zimbardo Dissertation Award, Yale University 2008-2009 Graduate Student Travel Grant, Society for Judgment and Decision-Making 2008 National Merit Scholarship 1999-2003 RESEARCH EXPERTISE Goals and Motivation Consumer Behavior Interpersonal Judgments Labor practices Julie Huang August 2021 Curriculum Vitae Page 2 PUBLICATIONS/ARTICLES UNDER REVIEW 1. Huang, Julie Y. (2020), “Unfit by Accident: Third-party Perception of Parental Fitness Based upon Childbearing Intention.” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11:1, 126-33. 2. Lee, Spike W.S., Julie Y. Huang and Norbert Schwarz (2020), “Risk Overgeneralization in Times of a Contagious Disease Threat,” Frontiers in Psychology, 11:1392. 3. Chan, C.S. Richard, Haemin Dennis Park, Julie Y. Huang and Annaleena Parhankangas (2020), “Less is More? Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Readability and Screening Evaluations Across Pitch Competition and Crowdfunding Contexts.” Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, e00176.
    [Show full text]
  • Jon Krosnick Frederic O
    Jon Krosnick Frederic O. Glover Professor of Humanities and Social Sciences, Professor of Communication and of Political Science and, by courtesy, of Psychology Curriculum Vitae available Online Bio BIO Jon Krosnick is a social psychologist who does research on attitude formation, change, and effects, on the psychology of political behavior, and on survey research methods. He is the Frederic O. Glover Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences, Professor of Communication, Political Science, and (by courtesy) Psychology. At Stanford, in addition to his professorships, he directs the Political Psychology Research Group and the Summer Institute in Political Psychology. To read reports on Professor Krosnick’s research program exploring public opinion on the environment visit the Woods Institute for the Environment and the Public Opinion on Climate Change web sites. Research Interests Author of four books and more than 140 articles and chapters, Dr. Krosnick conducts research in three primary areas: (1) attitude formation, change, and effects, (2) the psychology of political behavior, and (3) the optimal design of questionnaires used for laboratory experiments and surveys, and survey research methodology more generally. His attitude research has focused primarily on the notion of attitude strength, seeking to differentiate attitudes that are firmly crystallized and powerfully influential of thinking and action from attitudes that are flexible and inconsequential. Many of his studies in this area have focused on the amount of personal importance that an individual chooses to attach to an attitude. Dr. Krosnick’s studies have illuminated the origins of attitude importance (e.g., material self-interest and values) and the cognitive and behavioral consequences of importance in regulating attitude impact and attitude change processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being
    IZA DP No. 4850 Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being Alois Stutzer Bruno S. Frey March 2010 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being Alois Stutzer University of Basel, CREMA and IZA Bruno S. Frey University of Zurich and CREMA Discussion Paper No. 4850 March 2010 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns
    METACOGNITIVE EXPERIENCES AND THE INTRICACIES OF SETTING PEOPLE STRAIGHT: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING AND PUBLIC INFORMATION CAMPAIGNS Norbert Schwarz Lawrence J. Sanna Ian Skurnik Carolyn Yoon I. Introduction Decades of psychological research documented that human judgment often falls short of normative ideals. Social and cognitive psychologists discovered an ever increasing number of systematic biases and illustrated their pervasive role in judgment and decision making (for reviews see Gilovich, GriYn, & Kahneman, 2002; Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982; Kerr, MacCoun, & Kramer, 1996; Nisbett & Ross, 1980; Pohl, 2005). Similarly, researchers in applied fields, like health and consumer behavior, identified numerous erro- neous beliefs that impair good decisions and prevent people from doing what would be in their best interest (Christensen, Moran, & Wiebe, 1999; Webley, Burgoyne, Lea, & Young, 2001). In both cases, the remedy seems obvious: If people only thought enough about the issues at hand, considered all the relevant information and employed proper reasoning strategies, their deci- sion making would surely improve. This assumption is at the heart of numerous strategies that attempt to debias human judgment (for a review see Larrick, 2004); it is likewise central to public information campaigns designed to dispel erroneous beliefs and to replace them with more accurate information (for a review see Rice & Atkin, 2001). Unfortunately, these attempts to improve decision making often fail to achieve their goals, even under conditions assumed to foster rational judgment. 127 ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL Copyright 2007, Elsevier Inc. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL. 39 All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X 0065-2601/07 $35.00 128 NORBERT SCHWARZ et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’S Processing Experience?
    Personality and Social Psychology Review Copyright © 2004 by 2004, Vol. 8, No. 4, 364–382 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Rolf Reber Department of Psychosocial Science University of Bergen, Norway Norbert Schwarz Department of Psychology and Institute for Social Research University of Michigan Piotr Winkielman Department of Psychology University of California, San Diego We propose that aesthetic pleasure is a function of the perceiver’s processing dynam- ics: The more fluently perceivers can process an object, the more positive their aes- thetic response. We review variables known to influence aesthetic judgments, such as figural goodness, figure–ground contrast, stimulus repetition, symmetry, and pro- totypicality, and trace their effects to changes in processing fluency. Other variables that influence processing fluency, like visual or semantic priming, similarly increase judgments of aesthetic pleasure. Our proposal provides an integrative framework for the study of aesthetic pleasure and sheds light on the interplay between early prefer- ences versus cultural influences on taste, preferences for both prototypical and ab- stracted forms, and the relation between beauty and truth. In contrast to theories that trace aesthetic pleasure to objective stimulus features per se, we propose that beauty is grounded in the processing experiences of the perceiver, which are in part a func- tion of stimulus properties. What is beauty? What makes for a beautiful face, kiewicz, 1970). This objectivist view inspired many appealing painting, pleasing design, or charming scen- psychological attempts to identify the critical contrib- ery? This question has been debated for at least 2,500 utors to beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Heuristics and Biases the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. In
    P1: FYX/FYX P2: FYX/UKS QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH CB419-Gilovich CB419-Gilovich-FM May 30, 2002 12:3 HEURISTICS AND BIASES The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment Edited by THOMAS GILOVICH Cornell University DALE GRIFFIN Stanford University DANIEL KAHNEMAN Princeton University iii P1: FYX/FYX P2: FYX/UKS QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH CB419-Gilovich CB419-Gilovich-FM May 30, 2002 12:3 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014, Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2002 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2002 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Palatino 9.75/12.5 pt. System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data Heuristics and biases : the psychology of intuitive judgment / edited by Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, Daniel Kahneman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-521-79260-6 – ISBN 0-521-79679-2 (pbk.) 1. Judgment. 2. Reasoning (Psychology) 3. Critical thinking. I. Gilovich, Thomas. II. Griffin, Dale III. Kahneman, Daniel, 1934– BF447 .H48 2002 153.4 – dc21 2001037860 ISBN 0 521 79260 6 hardback ISBN 0 521 79679 2 paperback iv P1: FYX/FYX P2: FYX/UKS QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH CB419-Gilovich CB419-Gilovich-FM May 30, 2002 12:3 Contents List of Contributors page xi Preface xv Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now 1 Thomas Gilovich and Dale Griffin PART ONE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Candidates' Statements About Climate Change On
    The Impact of Candidates’ Statements about Climate Change on Electoral Success in 2008 and 2010: Evidence Using Three Methodologies Bo MacInnis Jon A. Krosnick Ana Villar Stanford University August, 2011 This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant 1042938 and by the Woods Institute for the Environment. Jon Krosnick is University Fellow at Resources for the Future. Address correspondence about this study to Jon A. Krosnick, McClatchy Hall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 (email: [email protected]). The Impact of Candidates’ Statements about Climate Change on Electoral Success in 2008 and 2010: Evidence Using Three Methodologies Abstract More than a decade of national surveys suggest that the vast majority of Americans who attach personal importance to the issue of climate change take what might be called “green” positions on that issue – endorsing the existence of warming, human causation, and the need for ameliorative action. This finding suggests that candidates running for office can gain votes by taking green positions and might lose votes by expressing skepticism about climate change. This paper describes tests of these hypotheses using three methodologies: (1) experiments embedded in a national survey and in three state surveys, (2) an analysis relating statement on climate change made by 2010 Congressional candidates with their victory rates, and (3) an analysis of the relation of climate change issue positions with votes during the 2008 Presidential election. All three methodologies yield evidence consistent with the notion that a candidate gained votes by taking a green position and lost votes by taking a not-green position. The effects of taking green and not green positions were larger among people who believed in anthropogenic warming than among people who did not, and the effects were stronger among people who attached more personal importance to the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Schwarz, Norbert; and Others Recalled Behavior and Ease
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 251 743 CG 017 871 AUTHOR Schwarz, Norbert; And Others TITLE Recalled Behavior and Ease of Recall es Information in Self-Assessment. SPONS AGENCY Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn - Bad Godesberg (West Germany). PUB DATE Aug 84 GRANT . Schw-278/2-1 NOTE 11p.; Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (92nd, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August 24-28, 1984). PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) -- Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Assertiveness; Attribution Theory; Cognitive Processes; College Students; *Difficulty Level; Foreign Countries; Higher Education; Personality Traits; *Recall (Psychology); *Self Concept; *Self Evaluation (Individuals) IDENTIFIERS West Germany ABSTRACT In studies examining the influence of recall on judgments, social psychologists have generally concentrated on the content of recalled material rather than on the process of recall. To investigate the impact of recalled behaviors (content) and the ease with which these behaviors came to mind (process) on assessment of one's own assertiveness, 158 West German students were asked to .describe either six (easy recall) or twelve (difficult recall) examples of their own assertive or non-assertive behaviors. To manipulate the distinctiveness of the recall, subjects were told the task would or would not be difficult. On the basis of the availability heuristic it was assumed that subjects in the difficult recall conditions would assess themselves as being less assertive (or non-assertive) than subjects in the easy recall condition, despite the larger number of recalled behaviors. Results clearly supported this prediction, suggesting that the ease with which examples could be brought to mind was used as an informational basis for evaluating personal attributes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presenters Paradox
    Journal of Consumer Research, Inc. The Presenter’s Paradox Author(s): Kimberlee Weaver, Stephen M. Garcia, and Norbert Schwarz Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 39, No. 3 (October 2012), pp. 445-460 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/664497 . Accessed: 22/09/2012 14:19 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Journal of Consumer Research, Inc. are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Consumer Research. http://www.jstor.org The Presenter’s Paradox KIMBERLEE WEAVER STEPHEN M. GARCIA NORBERT SCHWARZ This analysis introduces the Presenter’s Paradox. Robust findings in impression formation demonstrate that perceivers’ judgments show a weighted averaging pat- tern, which results in less favorable evaluations when mildly favorable information is added to highly favorable information. Across seven studies, we show that pre- senters do not anticipate this averaging pattern on the part of evaluators and instead design presentations that include all of the favorable information available. This additive strategy (“more is better”) hurts presenters in their perceivers’ eyes be- cause mildly favorable information dilutes the impact of highly favorable information.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Accuracy of Rdd Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples
    Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access published October 5, 2011 Public Opinion Quarterly, pp. 1–39 COMPARING THE ACCURACY OF RDD TELEPHONE SURVEYS AND INTERNET SURVEYS CONDUCTED WITH PROBABILITY AND NON-PROBABILITY SAMPLES DAVID S. YEAGER* JON A. KROSNICK* LINCHIAT CHANG HAROLD S. JAVITZ MATTHEW S. LEVENDUSKY ALBERTO SIMPSER RUI WANG Downloaded from poq.oxfordjournals.org Abstract This study assessed the accuracy of telephone and Internet surveys of probability samples and Internet surveys of non-probability samples of American adults by comparing aggregate survey results at University of Pennsylvania Library on October 6, 2011 against benchmarks. The probability sample surveys were consistently more accurate than the non-probability sample surveys, even after post-stratification with demographics. The non-probability sample survey measurements were much more variable in their accuracy, both across measures within a single survey and across surveys with a single measure. Post-stratification improved the overall accuracy of some of the non- probability sample surveys but decreased the overall accuracy of others. DAVID S. YEAGER is a PhD candidate at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. JON A. KROSNICK is Frederic O. Glover Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences, Professor of Communication, Po- litical Science, and (by courtesy) Psychology at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, and is Uni- versity Fellow at Resources for the Future. LINCHIAT CHANG is the owner of LinChiat Chang Consulting, LLC, San Francisco, CA, USA. HAROLD S. JAVITZ is Principal Scientist at SRI Interna- tional, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA. MATTHEW S. LEVENDUSKY is Assistant Professor of Political Sci- ence at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Gricean Charity © 2006 Sage Publications 10.1177/0048393106287235 the Gricean Turn in Psychology Hosted at Carole J
    PoSS287235.qxd 4/25/2006 11:45 PM Page 193 Philosophy of the Social Sciences Volume 36 Number 2 June 2006 193-218 Gricean Charity © 2006 Sage Publications 10.1177/0048393106287235 http://pos.sagepub.com The Gricean Turn in Psychology hosted at Carole J. Lee http://online.sagepub.com University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Psychologists’ work on conversational pragmatics and judgment suggests a refreshing approach to charitable interpretation and theorizing. This charita- ble approach—what I call Gricean charity—recognizes the role of conversa- tional assumptions and norms in subject-experimenter communication. In this paper, I outline the methodological lessons Gricean charity gleans from psy- chologists’ work in conversational pragmatics. In particular, Gricean charity imposes specific evidential standards requiring that researchers collect empirical information about (1) the conditions of successful and unsuccess- ful communication for specific experimental contexts, and (2) the conver- sational norms governing communication in experimental contexts. More generally, the Gricean turn in psychological research shifts focus from attri- butional to reflexive, situational explanations. Gricean charity does not pri- marily seek to rationalize subject responses. Rather, it imposes evidential requirements on psychological studies for the purpose of gaining a more accurate picture of the surprising and muddled ways in which we weigh evidence and draw. Keywords: Gricean charity; methodological rationalism; interpretation; prin- ciple of charity; cognitive psychology; conversational pragmatics; heuristics and biases; reflexive analysis raditional accounts of charitable interpretation that rely on norms of Trationality to guide interpretation have typically invoked rules of logic and probability, as well as principles of evidence or justification—while overlooking norms governing the social and communicative relationships between the interpreter and interpreted.
    [Show full text]